I'm glad they pointed out that the idea of the right to a healthy environment was started in places that we in the West often characterize as "less developed." I had no idea and I think its important for us to give our heads a shake when we start thinking too highly of ourselves as "leading the way" and developing countries as trailing behind us
The common historical narrative tends to be that environmentalism came from conservation movements that initially applied to cultural assets, which was driven by European colonialism, exploration, and archaeology Now we're realizing that these ideas were learnt from the indigenous peoples they colonized
Right? So many people diss about malaysia sucks here sucks there, indeed, it may be true. But nothing is perfect, and living here is close to perfect already, for example, not much natural hazards, stable weather, no four seasons, enough rain, etc. and I certainly won’t want the competitiveness of SG or China lol. I’d move from malaysia should it happen, a lot of foreigners live here for the same exact reason, other than being exchange students, or just study here. Like just just leave us alone, malaysia can be better, yes, but should it be? Not really a ques to be answered by foreigners who didn’t live here for some time and come to appreciate malaysia. A lot of people from competitive areas have moved to here, there’s always a reason for it
yes i agree more class actions - corporations, CEOs & boards have some weird plot armour, revolving door government corporations / corporate governments..... wheres the democratic oversight & enforcement
Corporations and billionaires follow the same rules (laws). I believe the problem of our era is corruption and politics. Speaking from my point of view, in my country, we have for example a minister of justice that didnt study law, a minister of economics that didnt study economics and never worked for the private sector, etc. And since I work as an architect I know from facts that the town hall supports projects when they earn something (personal gain > public gain) ;(
If your Government allows you to sue, be grateful. It means that they accept that they can be wrong too. Any government that has integrity, responsibility, and transparency will allow you to sue snd fight for your rights.
While I do believe that the UDHR was a huge step forward in human rights, the fact that it is technically not a binding set of rights makes it not as effective as it should be. Many places around the world (even the US in certain cases) see this system as more of an ideal rather than a requirement, which is highly concerning in my opinion.
How are you going to create a binding set of rules that 100+ countries with so many different people, culture, landmarks and laws have to follow and have it enforced when the US, the leading country of the UN still criminalized Homesexuality.
@@annekekramer3835 Easy to say, but hard to do when the big countries themselves don't reflect the protocol it's trying to show to the small countries.
A supreme court case in the Philippines allowed animals to have legal standing to sue in court, especially on violations involving environmental laws, though they must still be represented by a steward
Most people forget about this clause, but the first amendment does guarantee the right to petition the government for grievances. I don’t see why the destruction of the world shouldn’t cover that
What are the consequences for citizen under dictatorial regimes trying to sue their governments? Just think about what they will sacrifice for trying to do so before answering the question.
“When he was twelve, the time had come then and with his eyes, he said he loved them. Then came the suits, then came the government. She stood and cried, she could not keep him.” DISPATCH
A big thank you to TED-Ed for this thought-provoking video. It delves into the intersection of human rights and the environment, sparking crucial discussions. For English Learner, here are my notes & lessons: The video explores the global movement where young plaintiffs sue governments for inaction on climate change, framing climate issues as a violation of basic human rights. It traces the evolution of human rights and their incorporation at the national level, emphasizing the urgency of protecting the right to a healthy environment amidst climate challenges. Vocabulary breakdown: 0. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) (noun phrase) 01:21 -Context: 'This document, known as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights...' -Explanation: UDHR is the foundational international document outlining inherent freedoms for all people, irrespective of their identity or location, forming the basis for human rights law. 1. Indigenous Laws and Worldviews (noun phrase) 02:32 -Context: 'Many countries within the Global South, often influenced by Indigenous laws...' -Explanation: Reference to the impact of Indigenous laws and worldviews on countries, especially in the Global South, in incorporating the right to a healthy environment into their legal frameworks. 2. Enshrine (verb) 03:50 -Context: 'Today, over 150 countries and jurisdictions have enshrined the right to a healthy environment...' -Explanation: Describes the act of officially incorporating the right to a healthy environment into national legislation, emphasizing the widespread recognition of this right. 3. Colombian Supreme Court (noun phrase) 03:58 -Context: 'On April 5th, 2018, the Colombian Supreme Court ruled in favor of the young plaintiffs...' -Explanation: Refers to a significant legal decision where the Colombian Supreme Court supported young plaintiffs, affirming the government's legal obligation to address deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions. 4. UN General Assembly (noun phrase) 04:36 -Context: 'In 2022, an overwhelming majority of UN General Assembly states came together...' -Explanation: Highlights the collective action of UN General Assembly states in recognizing the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, showcasing global cooperation on environmental human rights. 5. Global Cooperation (noun phrase) 04:57 -Context: 'It will take unprecedented global cooperation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions...' -Explanation: Emphasizes the necessity of unparalleled international collaboration to address climate challenges, including reducing emissions, stopping deforestation, and maintaining clean waterways. Deepen your understanding of global issues. Download our app [AI-powered Learning English with VOA]: play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.aipowered.voalearningenglish. Happy learning!
This is assuming the legal system is fair and impartial. In reality, when there's billions of dollars behind a cause, they usually win legal battles, sometimes by attrition as they spend millions on lawyers. And then even if a lawsuit is won, enforcement is another issue.
@@Humanresouces Can you blame them? There's decades of evidence showing that the people's policy wishes don't get enacted no matter who is voted vor. And of course there's uniparty of money - desperate to amplify wedge issues to make it seem they're different parties, but they're the same in economic policy.
your content haven’t failed me once I can’t describe how grateful I am for having the previlege to watch your videos for free. so many videos so great content I don’t ever have any remarks it’s amazing what you give us thank you
Nah this made me sad. It feels like the United States truly do not care about its people or anyone (other countries as well we have our foot in)with how they run this country. Left and right side. First thing that came to my mind is Flint, Michigan. And how they are “handling” that
We need to be able to pick multiple parties. People are scared to vote third party because they feel like they would waste a vote. First past the post is a terrible system.
I feel concern about rights of animals in my country (Russia), therefore I try to do what I can do: volunteering in some Centers of wild animals rehabilitation and reintroduction. I love my volunteering work💚💚💚🐻❄️🐼🦅🕊🦭🦤💚💚💚
Okay i got really excited when i say the thumbnail of "do you have the right to bird song" and i thought this was going to be about whistling and how imitation bird calls were illegal and how it disturbed their communications, this video was full of surprises 😅
Human Rights about Environmental protection it is also basic rights of the citizens ask the question to Govt or Sue the Government for not protecting our environment for Future Generations UNHDR should add The Environment protection on Human rights as law to protect by Government for Nature
No, corporations don't have a "right" to poison the air, water, & land we all live by. The old saying, "your right to swing your arm ends where someone else's nose begins" is completely ignored. This what we get for as long as the tail wags the doh.
This is a bit of an oversimplification. Declaring things like a healthy ecosystem a human right sounds nice, however there are situations where in practice sacrifices have to be made for economic reasons. As an example, many third world countries don’t have the same filtering technology or standards to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, and consequently the west makes up only 10% of all global emissions, while less developed countries make up the other 90%. The problem is if we put heavy pressure to force these countries to reduce emissions we’re removing jobs from already impoverished countries. I don’t think a desire for a healthy ecosystem trumps the rights of these countries to grow their economies and lift their people out of poverty. This is a nuanced issue, and declaring a healthy ecosystem a universal right is over-idealistic and shuts down healthy debate on the course of action most beneficial to most people.
We've tried this. It failed. Suing governments and corporations is like trying to trim the leaves off a tree; it doesn't fundamentally change the root of the issue. If one has a larger issue with conglomerate-sized entities, the solution would be to provide the youngest generation with education that isn't solely based in academia. Academia and the pursuit of occupational success creates a society of people based on advancing technology and prioritizing that goal. The only true special difference between humans and any other species is our humanity; the preservation of that should always be first and foremost not just more moral or ethical reasons (as those are generally subjective) but because with the collapse of humanity comes an immediate halt to the history of humankind. All our development, thousands and millions of years of evolution to get to where we are could and would immediately (by definition) come to a halt if humanity were to implode.
There's a legal separation in between the legislature and the courts in most countries. The legislature can be found to be ignoring the law, usually due to their legislative agenda not lining up with the constitution of the country or other laws. A recent example would be the UK courts ruling that the Rwanda refugee plan is not legal given the UK's commitment to human right laws. The legislature can usually edit the constitution and pull out of international treaties, but that's often harder than passing the initial law.
Have you noticed. You wash your teeth the phone gives you an ad of plaintiff bucal cream. You eat one orange. And so on Technology is going further quickly than our thrust to adapt well
I'm gonna say yes we should sue the government. The problem is they are also the judges and will just let themselves off even if they are in the wrong, and they almost always are. Now I will watch the video.
“What you know about bread Dr.Birmingham sandwich. Boycott those grits, sit in with som e spinach, with protest and women the same advice goes: always stay away from the hose.” Gandhi
If it requires the labor of another person then it's not a right. / / The planet is humanity's shared Life Support System. Pollution is a crime, destruction an atrocity.
Good to hear the positive tone, though international treaties and local laws are broken left and right and are often not worth the paper they are written on. Lets hope for the best.
Sad that has taken such young folk to talk sense into people about basic common sense stuff, our elders have not paid enough careful attention, and the massive sickness of our elderly may show just how in trouble they are too, as well as the youth of a healthy tomorrow.
Interesting that this video came out now with what is going on in the world. Also curious how 1948 was the year when this document was signed and yet some things changed very little
"countries say that by 2050 we will go net zero" bs. we need to hold countries accountable through agitation, education, and organization. we need to protest, and to create extra-governmental local organisations which will actually do change instead of making empty promises on human rights they define and only have to follow through on based on laws they create and remove.
The Universal Declaration of Humans Rights was not the first international agreement on Humans Rights as the video points out, there was already many others like the Human Rights agreement of the Organization of American States or even previous agreements under the now defunct League of Nations. It is true that The Universal Declaration of Humans Right is probably the most important one of these, but that is a mistake nothless. Also the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, although initially non binding, is by praxis obrigatory, as the International Court of Justice and other international organizations have already ruled against countries that broke them regardless of they accepting them or not.
rights are social and legal constructions. created by the rich and powerful for the rich and powerful. there's a reason why kissenger was never tried and convicted. we must not be constrained to the rights defined by the rich and powerful, but what is good for the masses.
RIGHT(S) 1 Chronicles 4:41 The word “Palestine” comes from the Hebrew word ‘peleshet’ meaning rolling or migratory; probably from the Philistines originally living in Gaza - where the Greeks later called Palestine. Now I am “biased” here; but the excommunication and annexation of Palestine by Israel in 1948 is endemic of what GOD empowered the Israelites to do in c. 1250 BC. Today we frown upon genocide, mass extermination, and global warfare - still GOD in JESUS CHRIST moves leaders, nations, and the very ground beneath our feet! Rights? It’s His prerogative, sovereign will, absolute plan, and deictic desire. Rights? …. Check my BOSS - He’s always right!
Imaging talking about suing the government for climate change instead of suing them for their involvement in acts of genocide and commuting war crimes 💀
@@deadpanforlife8878 If they leave, can they take their houses, factories, properties ect...? Andf also what forbids us from saying "any income you make here is taxed" and if thye leave capitalism is made so that someone is gonna come eventually (usually pretty quickely, you know opportunities).
@@malogibeaux4946 they take their family and money and leave the country. Everything else won’t matter, any illegal activity also won’t matter. Other nations will refuse to extradite the economic boons that are rich people spending a lot of money or rich people investing in the marketplace. Whatever fallouts happen afterwards the rich don’t care about.
I agree with the people that are suing, we need a healthy environment to help uphold our human rights.
I'm glad they pointed out that the idea of the right to a healthy environment was started in places that we in the West often characterize as "less developed." I had no idea and I think its important for us to give our heads a shake when we start thinking too highly of ourselves as "leading the way" and developing countries as trailing behind us
The common historical narrative tends to be that environmentalism came from conservation movements that initially applied to cultural assets, which was driven by European colonialism, exploration, and archaeology
Now we're realizing that these ideas were learnt from the indigenous peoples they colonized
Right? So many people diss about malaysia sucks here sucks there, indeed, it may be true. But nothing is perfect, and living here is close to perfect already, for example, not much natural hazards, stable weather, no four seasons, enough rain, etc. and I certainly won’t want the competitiveness of SG or China lol. I’d move from malaysia should it happen, a lot of foreigners live here for the same exact reason, other than being exchange students, or just study here. Like just just leave us alone, malaysia can be better, yes, but should it be? Not really a ques to be answered by foreigners who didn’t live here for some time and come to appreciate malaysia. A lot of people from competitive areas have moved to here, there’s always a reason for it
uuuppp
jpp
The question should be: could we sue massive corporations and billionaires? and how can we sue when the entire system work for them and against us?
If u can live without current lifestyle
Like without internet, cars , airconditioner , fast foods etc
Only then u speak against massive corporates
@@BabyIshiibut the corporations don’t make those things, people do
And this is why we form unions
yes i agree more class actions - corporations, CEOs & boards have some weird plot armour, revolving door government corporations / corporate governments..... wheres the democratic oversight & enforcement
Corporations and billionaires follow the same rules (laws). I believe the problem of our era is corruption and politics. Speaking from my point of view, in my country, we have for example a minister of justice that didnt study law, a minister of economics that didnt study economics and never worked for the private sector, etc. And since I work as an architect I know from facts that the town hall supports projects when they earn something (personal gain > public gain) ;(
If your Government allows you to sue, be grateful.
It means that they accept that they can be wrong too. Any government that has integrity, responsibility, and transparency will allow you to sue snd fight for your rights.
Doesn't mean they'll hold themselves accountable for their actions
@@andieallison6792at least it is a step towards voicing dissent openly. Some of us can't even imagine suing the government.
You're right, people can only sue if theres some kind of true democracy in place.
@@interferenzbrille_2542you can definitely sue the government in an autocracy too lmao
@@capitan_gorgonzolazola Sure, but I doubt most people would almost certainly forfeit their lives for an uncertain outcome
It’s sad watching some of these rights being stripped away from some people
If you're paying attention then you'll notice they're gradually being stripped away from all us
Sounds great and I do hope that the world is a better place for the future generations to live in and I hope this works for long.
Me, too.
Hope is for free. Ideas are seeds.
While I do believe that the UDHR was a huge step forward in human rights, the fact that it is technically not a binding set of rights makes it not as effective as it should be. Many places around the world (even the US in certain cases) see this system as more of an ideal rather than a requirement, which is highly concerning in my opinion.
How are you going to create a binding set of rules that 100+ countries with so many different people, culture, landmarks and laws have to follow and have it enforced when the US, the leading country of the UN still criminalized Homesexuality.
@@RGC_animationin order to "bind" it, you need to have the ability to enforce it.
This!
@@RGC_animationThe same way the Montreal protocol was enacted. It's not that hard, as long as the big countries show the way for the small countries.
@@annekekramer3835 Easy to say, but hard to do when the big countries themselves don't reflect the protocol it's trying to show to the small countries.
A supreme court case in the Philippines allowed animals to have legal standing to sue in court, especially on violations involving environmental laws, though they must still be represented by a steward
I wish we had more efficient international law enforcement and laws regarding some of the worst crimes like destruction of nature.
We wished for this ever since the League of Nations. Since WW1 we always wanted a way every nation could hold accountability.
As a colombiana myself, I'm proud of that court decision.
Yes, we should.
Nah, we shouldn't.
@@ronlacker326Do you live in Equestria?
“People shouldn’t be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people.”
-some libertarian.
Based
Marquise de Sade?
Alan Moore is an anarchist
governments should serve the people. If they do not serve the people, then they cannot be allowed to exist.
I wish (mega)corporations can be afraid of the people too.
Most people forget about this clause, but the first amendment does guarantee the right to petition the government for grievances. I don’t see why the destruction of the world shouldn’t cover that
What are the consequences for citizen under dictatorial regimes trying to sue their governments? Just think about what they will sacrifice for trying to do so before answering the question.
persecution and potentially death
@@KudiGamerSometimes including their families.
They will be labelled a traitor and then jailed based on nonsensical charges.
Citizens under dictatorships can't, but we can.
“When he was twelve, the time had come then and with his eyes, he said he loved them. Then came the suits, then came the government. She stood and cried, she could not keep him.” DISPATCH
Wat?
When who was twelve?
Wut?
Accountability is the first step to Responsibility
A big thank you to TED-Ed for this thought-provoking video. It delves into the intersection of human rights and the environment, sparking crucial discussions.
For English Learner, here are my notes & lessons:
The video explores the global movement where young plaintiffs sue governments for inaction on climate change, framing climate issues as a violation of basic human rights. It traces the evolution of human rights and their incorporation at the national level, emphasizing the urgency of protecting the right to a healthy environment amidst climate challenges.
Vocabulary breakdown:
0. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) (noun phrase) 01:21
-Context: 'This document, known as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights...'
-Explanation: UDHR is the foundational international document outlining inherent freedoms for all people, irrespective of their identity or location, forming the basis for human rights law.
1. Indigenous Laws and Worldviews (noun phrase) 02:32
-Context: 'Many countries within the Global South, often influenced by Indigenous laws...'
-Explanation: Reference to the impact of Indigenous laws and worldviews on countries, especially in the Global South, in incorporating the right to a healthy environment into their legal frameworks.
2. Enshrine (verb) 03:50
-Context: 'Today, over 150 countries and jurisdictions have enshrined the right to a healthy environment...'
-Explanation: Describes the act of officially incorporating the right to a healthy environment into national legislation, emphasizing the widespread recognition of this right.
3. Colombian Supreme Court (noun phrase) 03:58
-Context: 'On April 5th, 2018, the Colombian Supreme Court ruled in favor of the young plaintiffs...'
-Explanation: Refers to a significant legal decision where the Colombian Supreme Court supported young plaintiffs, affirming the government's legal obligation to address deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions.
4. UN General Assembly (noun phrase) 04:36
-Context: 'In 2022, an overwhelming majority of UN General Assembly states came together...'
-Explanation: Highlights the collective action of UN General Assembly states in recognizing the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, showcasing global cooperation on environmental human rights.
5. Global Cooperation (noun phrase) 04:57
-Context: 'It will take unprecedented global cooperation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions...'
-Explanation: Emphasizes the necessity of unparalleled international collaboration to address climate challenges, including reducing emissions, stopping deforestation, and maintaining clean waterways.
Deepen your understanding of global issues. Download our app [AI-powered Learning English with VOA]: play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.aipowered.voalearningenglish. Happy learning!
I feel without ted ed the world would be a much worse place
trust me, ted ed not existing would be better for everybody
@@richard_returns_IRL How about I don't trust you and ask for your reasoning?
@@dominickeijzer5844 Why don't you ask why without ted-ed world would be a much worse place?
@@richard_returns_IRL elaborate
Ted ed is for pretentious pseudo-intellectuals.
Love the artwork on this one! I wonder: could I theoretically only sue my own government, or other governments as well?
Rights are made by humans - lawmakers to be precise. So it all depends on what rights you fight for. At least that is my understanding.
@@nilsp9426 But others will say rights are natural and god given
@@andrew9812Then I am open to talk to their God. Oh wait, it doesn't exist.
The artwork is barely different from the same cosmopolitanism and globohomo art style you see everywhere.
@@thesecondhat4717 still liked it tho
This is assuming the legal system is fair and impartial. In reality, when there's billions of dollars behind a cause, they usually win legal battles, sometimes by attrition as they spend millions on lawyers. And then even if a lawsuit is won, enforcement is another issue.
If only half of the US population actually voted, maybe we would have less corruption.
@@Humanresouces Can you blame them? There's decades of evidence showing that the people's policy wishes don't get enacted no matter who is voted vor. And of course there's uniparty of money - desperate to amplify wedge issues to make it seem they're different parties, but they're the same in economic policy.
Even if the people won the case, the implementation of the Court's Decision is the most difficult part.
your content haven’t failed me once I can’t describe how grateful I am for having the previlege to watch your videos for free. so many videos so great content I don’t ever have any remarks it’s amazing what you give us thank you
Fun fact: the original title was:" Should You Sue The Government?"
You are the best narrator!!
Humanity is fascinating.
compared to what? What is your reference point?
Compared to nothing. Fascination has nothing to compare to. It is just simply how someone feels about it.
@@tortul1462 Then everything is fascinating if you don't have a referent point. That is formal logic.
@@ozymandiasultor9480 where is your reference point for that?
@@tortul1462 I really like this comment. Its just nice :)
spreading the word on all my social media now. thank you for sharing
🤣😂🤣😂🤣
@@ozymandiasultor9480 I'm curious why that makes you laugh
To preserve the environment, we need private property rights. Where is private property rights mentioned in that document?
Edit: No it is not
@Humanresouces Would you consider ponds to be "adequate housing?"
@@mr.e2962Who will buy the ponds? I don't trust people who buy land to do anything but squeeze the resources out of it.
@Humanresouces, what do you mean by squeeze?
You should be voting to keep your government to a manageable size.
The bigger it gets the more unwieldy it will become.
Absolutely
Any gov can fail, no matter the size. A lot of local election results in catastrophic results.
The issue is that the same applies to corporations. A government too small is essentially powerless towards corporations.
Nah this made me sad. It feels like the United States truly do not care about its people or anyone (other countries as well we have our foot in)with how they run this country. Left and right side. First thing that came to my mind is Flint, Michigan. And how they are “handling” that
We need to be able to pick multiple parties. People are scared to vote third party because they feel like they would waste a vote. First past the post is a terrible system.
The question you missed is, where do rights come from?
From the same government who decides when they are inconvenient to their agenda.
I feel concern about rights of animals in my country (Russia), therefore I try to do what I can do: volunteering in some Centers of wild animals rehabilitation and reintroduction. I love my volunteering work💚💚💚🐻❄️🐼🦅🕊🦭🦤💚💚💚
54 degrees on December 7th in Minnesota today ... can we please take action
what's that in not-american
@@modkip25 the equivalent of an average high temperature of -2°C being 13°C in December
Same where I live today. Feels like early spring in the middle of what should be winter
@@Tatews37 thx
@@pageturner2958Then the summer will be painful as frick
This is a new favourite TED-Ed video 100%. Beautiful animation, lovely background music, brilliant topic.
Okay i got really excited when i say the thumbnail of "do you have the right to bird song" and i thought this was going to be about whistling and how imitation bird calls were illegal and how it disturbed their communications, this video was full of surprises 😅
Watching TED-Ed should be seen as a human right
Not really a right but a responsibility
@@DefenseOnTitan Sure, for insomniacs to fall asleep...
I feel better knowing many people like myself want to protect the environment!
Unhealthy environment doesn’t just affect animals but us also. We and the animals should all have a right to be in a healthy environment.
humans are animals
@@penguinscanfly5796 prove it
These videos are so well done and educative!❤
Thank you, TedEd
Human Rights about Environmental protection it is also basic rights of the citizens ask the question to Govt or Sue the Government for not protecting our environment for Future Generations UNHDR should add The Environment protection on Human rights as law to protect by Government for Nature
Basically, the people have a right to, "the consent of the governed" if and only if they are able to hold the powerful accountable.
As long as we don’t have democracy at our workplaces, we don’t really have a democracy.
Without good air and land to walk about, our basic freedom of everything is taken away.
Ted ed really helped me 😊
Basic science shows that a healthy environment benefits humanity.
South africans should sue their government every opportunity they have.
The voice over artist is honey for ears!
Ugh, I hate it when a true argument is supported with fallacious or emotional reasoning. 🙄🔫
Doesn't really help the poor in the inner cities or country or suburbs, does it?
I want everyone to get a lawyer too, but for some that's too unrealistic.
No, corporations don't have a "right" to poison the air, water, & land we all live by. The old saying, "your right to swing your arm ends where someone else's nose begins" is completely ignored. This what we get for as long as the tail wags the doh.
3:31 as an unemployed desperate young man i dont give a f about 2100
This is a bit of an oversimplification. Declaring things like a healthy ecosystem a human right sounds nice, however there are situations where in practice sacrifices have to be made for economic reasons. As an example, many third world countries don’t have the same filtering technology or standards to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, and consequently the west makes up only 10% of all global emissions, while less developed countries make up the other 90%. The problem is if we put heavy pressure to force these countries to reduce emissions we’re removing jobs from already impoverished countries. I don’t think a desire for a healthy ecosystem trumps the rights of these countries to grow their economies and lift their people out of poverty. This is a nuanced issue, and declaring a healthy ecosystem a universal right is over-idealistic and shuts down healthy debate on the course of action most beneficial to most people.
Third world countries actually don't really make up for a lot, if we had China, The US and the EU, we get 58% of all emissions already.
We love the animation!
We've tried this. It failed. Suing governments and corporations is like trying to trim the leaves off a tree; it doesn't fundamentally change the root of the issue. If one has a larger issue with conglomerate-sized entities, the solution would be to provide the youngest generation with education that isn't solely based in academia. Academia and the pursuit of occupational success creates a society of people based on advancing technology and prioritizing that goal. The only true special difference between humans and any other species is our humanity; the preservation of that should always be first and foremost not just more moral or ethical reasons (as those are generally subjective) but because with the collapse of humanity comes an immediate halt to the history of humankind. All our development, thousands and millions of years of evolution to get to where we are could and would immediately (by definition) come to a halt if humanity were to implode.
Sue the ATF
Abolish the NFA
This would be better than suing for muh climate change
The problem is, what does "suing the government" mean when the local government literally *is* the justice system ?
There's a legal separation in between the legislature and the courts in most countries. The legislature can be found to be ignoring the law, usually due to their legislative agenda not lining up with the constitution of the country or other laws.
A recent example would be the UK courts ruling that the Rwanda refugee plan is not legal given the UK's commitment to human right laws. The legislature can usually edit the constitution and pull out of international treaties, but that's often harder than passing the initial law.
From what the guy said above, I guess you should fight congress instead.
Wow❤
Hey, do you know what should be a human right? Free healthcare and education
It was about time!
Delightful animation
Have you noticed. You wash your teeth the phone gives you an ad of plaintiff bucal cream.
You eat one orange.
And so on
Technology is going further quickly than our thrust to adapt well
Get to suing, people!
I'm gonna say yes we should sue the government. The problem is they are also the judges and will just let themselves off even if they are in the wrong, and they almost always are. Now I will watch the video.
Clearly, it depends on where you were born to whether get human rights or not!🍉
Very good and thank you ❣❣❣❣❣🎁🎁🎁🎁👍👍👍👍👍👍💝
Klauss approves this message.
There should be animal rights like only spaying if cats is sick, if humans and trees can have consent why not cats?
Right time for this video!
FREE 🍉. Shame the inovadors for their disgraceful violations of every human right.
Brainwashed
Says the one who get the news from CNN and Fox news 💀💀@@ofir231
“What you know about bread Dr.Birmingham sandwich. Boycott those grits, sit in with som e spinach, with protest and women the same advice goes: always stay away from the hose.” Gandhi
If it requires the labor of another person then it's not a right.
/
/
The planet is humanity's shared Life Support System. Pollution is a crime, destruction an atrocity.
التغيير المناخ شئ مهم الوعي به خاصة ان منطقتنا العربية ستتاثر به بشدة.
Good to hear the positive tone, though international treaties and local laws are broken left and right and are often not worth the paper they are written on. Lets hope for the best.
Sad that has taken such young folk to talk sense into people about basic common sense stuff, our elders have not paid enough careful attention, and the massive sickness of our elderly may show just how in trouble they are too, as well as the youth of a healthy tomorrow.
Wouldn’t it be like suing ourselves since the gov just takes our money( taxes & bs laws etc.)
No.
@@johnnyearp52says no, doesn't explain , leaves
@@capitan_gorgonzolazola Think about it. If you sue the government you probably get back much more than you paid in taxes.
Interesting that this video came out now with what is going on in the world. Also curious how 1948 was the year when this document was signed and yet some things changed very little
Can you make a video on Artificial intelligence? Would be nice to know about a current affair
yes
....as young as 7???
7!!!!
What a 7 years old have to Say but the words of his parents???
I think you can do that in Germany.
why don't they sue petrochemical and automobile industry?
The government can regulate those industries through its policy making and do so much more.
"If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal." Emma Goldman.
Those are not right, but merely wishes.
"countries say that by 2050 we will go net zero" bs. we need to hold countries accountable through agitation, education, and organization. we need to protest, and to create extra-governmental local organisations which will actually do change instead of making empty promises on human rights they define and only have to follow through on based on laws they create and remove.
Did you know that you had rights? Well TedEd says you do.
Thanks
do we have the right to demand the government create unicorns? lol 😆
we are going
The Universal Declaration of Humans Rights was not the first international agreement on Humans Rights as the video points out, there was already many others like the Human Rights agreement of the Organization of American States or even previous agreements under the now defunct League of Nations. It is true that The Universal Declaration of Humans Right is probably the most important one of these, but that is a mistake nothless. Also the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, although initially non binding, is by praxis obrigatory, as the International Court of Justice and other international organizations have already ruled against countries that broke them regardless of they accepting them or not.
At 3:34 what is the meaning of knock off effect? Should it be knock-on effect?
Thx
Nice Video
thought they would mentioned greta
Birds the word !
the soundtrack in this one is special
Pray for Gaza ❤😢
Why?
There should be a human right to not have Fox News and daily wire ads!
rights are social and legal constructions. created by the rich and powerful for the rich and powerful. there's a reason why kissenger was never tried and convicted. we must not be constrained to the rights defined by the rich and powerful, but what is good for the masses.
Haven’t even watched the video, but yes.
RIGHT(S) 1 Chronicles 4:41
The word “Palestine” comes from the Hebrew word ‘peleshet’ meaning rolling or migratory; probably from the Philistines originally living in Gaza - where the Greeks later called Palestine. Now I am “biased” here; but the excommunication and annexation of Palestine by Israel in 1948 is endemic of what GOD empowered the Israelites to do in c. 1250 BC. Today we frown upon genocide, mass extermination, and global warfare - still GOD in JESUS CHRIST moves leaders, nations, and the very ground beneath our feet! Rights? It’s His prerogative, sovereign will, absolute plan, and deictic desire. Rights? …. Check my BOSS - He’s always right!
Imaging talking about suing the government for climate change instead of suing them for their involvement in acts of genocide and commuting war crimes 💀
Smh
It doesn't talk about that because it already has an agreed upon answer.
what?? why not both? 😂 wtf
i heard no suggestions in taxing the rich; they're the reason we're in this mess in the first place. otherwise, they're dinner.
We tax the rich they’ll either send the bill elsewhere (usually downwards towards poorer folk) or leave. No exceptions.
@@deadpanforlife8878 If they leave, can they take their houses, factories, properties ect...? Andf also what forbids us from saying "any income you make here is taxed" and if thye leave capitalism is made so that someone is gonna come eventually (usually pretty quickely, you know opportunities).
@@malogibeaux4946 they take their family and money and leave the country. Everything else won’t matter, any illegal activity also won’t matter. Other nations will refuse to extradite the economic boons that are rich people spending a lot of money or rich people investing in the marketplace. Whatever fallouts happen afterwards the rich don’t care about.