I love video's with Ian and Johnathan, I wish they would do more video's together just looking at guns. Would love a forgotten weapon style video with both of them!
It appears to be entirely mutual too. I just watched another video where Ian is in Leeds, West Yorkshire, at the Royal armouries. It made my day, as I live just a couple of miles along the Calder valley, from Leeds so Ian is actually in my neighbourhood! That's a strange satisfying feeling to know one of my favourite producer is in my neighbourhood.
Well, until you suddenly find two thousand of them missing. What comes around, goes around, I guess. 😉 Although, to be fair, I would attribute this to Jonathan's personal manner of speaking, which I find quite charming, and the composition of Royal Armouries collection, which includes a lot of British trials pieces.
British modesty: being casually off-hand about your priceless possessions is so much more 'classy' than breathlessly hyping them up. "Yeah, we've got a few old paintings",you say, as you lead them up a staircase past a dozen Vermeers, Rembrandts and Turners.
As an aside in the early 80’s I was a draughtsman in an engineering office in enfield on hot days in summer we had the windows wide open to catch some breeze, all day long you could hear the Enfield small arms factory test firing, sounded like the Somme some days
I can imagine. The sound of whistles blowing, Artillery shells exploding, rapid-fire small arms, machine guns laying down suppressing fire, the screams of the dying, some plummy-voiced git shouting about how some complete bastard has shot his favourite pigeon... ...And then back to work once lunch was over. 🤣
Did you ever hear the story about experienced Paratroopers going to a sten production plant and being out shot by some of the girls doing production and test firing?
@@michaeldoolan7595Oh, that would not be good for Paratrooper morale! The girls probably told them cheeky Para boys to sod off and then out shot them on the range! Oh the humiliation would have been unbearable! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Out shot by factory girls!
Just imagine if this hadn’t failed… We would’ve had 60 rounds, to the MP40’s 32, in a slick SMG. Especially compared to the Sten… (an amazing gun, but it looks like a failed coathanger abortion) It doesn’t beat the FG for looks though. It’s slick, but it’s not *polished oil slick* slick.
man, that double-magazine feeding system thing has gotta be one of the coolest things i've seen all year! fantastic engineering on this thing, sans that magazine safety position.
Christopher "Dickie" LeStrange-Metcalfe is my new standard for RIDICULOUSLY British names. Also, apparently he lost his commission for cheating at cards!
Long time viewer, infrequent commenter: I really appreciate that you took the time to record footage for how the mechanisms worked here. Really made me pause what I was doing and pay more attention to the video.
@@ELW2940 Not really, bayonets still formed a big role in tactics of the time so it wasn't useless to them. Now a days with tactics having evolved around Combined Arms Combat and having 30 rounds of death at full auto ready the Bayonet makes less sense. But for WW2, it makes sense that they had to add it to the design, as this was a requirement for most gun designs at the time, at least in the West.
I thought that's where the magazine was going but the double/single stack rear feed is totally mind-blowing, coffin shaped magazine is somehow quite appropriate. Thx. much. 👍
What a story, what a gun! Having worked with Czech engineers, I get why it’s a unorthodox design that actually works. Don’t know why but it’s a typical Czech thing.
I visited the royal armouries in leeds today, safe to say I was hugely impressed with the collection and the staff, had an interesting chat with one of the performers about star wars
I was trying to figure out what was up with the magazine all the way up until it was covered, and it's so much more delightfully weird than I could possibly imagine.
This gun has given me a lot of inspiration for a project I am working on. Thanks for showing this. Jonathan Ferguson never fails to find or say something that gives me inspiration.
This thing reminds me heavily of the 1940 S&W Light Rifle. Granted this thing seems like it probably wouldn't break as easy since it's still a pistol caliber.
The Smith & Wesson Light Rifle was also made for 9mm Parabellum. It was finely manufactured but poorly designed, the extra wide magazine well holds a pretty normal looking 9mm magazine, the extra space is just a 'chute' for spitting out empties, and there's a lot of practical problems with all that. Very brittle receiver, not one of S&W's prides.
@@0neDoomedSpaceMarineAlso the S&W wasn't even a full auto, they litterally tried to sell the british millitary a 9mm semi auto carbine like it was 1916.
@@rattlestormrepublic4874 A 9mm semi-auto carbine isn't like the worst idea, if it's closed bolt you can easily get good accuracy out of it and all, but the design for the Light Rifle was just not any good, it would not have benefited from having full-auto fire given its fragility. Mind, the vast majority of soldiers in WW2 were armed with bolt-action rifles, so a working semi-auto pistol caliber carbine would still have a pretty substantial advantage for CQB given the speed and capacity. Of course, an actual subgun would do that and more, and the Light Rifle was categorically inferior to any of the common subguns in WW2, categorically inferior to a Hi-Point carbine, really.
Very interesting concept to have a 60 round 9mm magazine at the same height and width of a 30 round magazine. Wish some others would’ve developed this concept further if it works reliably
It would have been awesome if the haversack had a V-42 dagger as used by the US/Canadian Devil's Brigade sheathed on the side of it. The complete package.
The collapsible stock design of this submachine gun is almost identical to the Italian OVP, an SMG which had been designed in 1917 as a personal defence weapon for Italian aviation crews. Very similar guns conceptually, and I wonder whether Veselý was somehow influenced by the OVP.
By "collapsible stock"? I guess you mean the butt and the way it fastens to the body? My guess is that you're reading a bit too far into that. The the way it fastens to the body is not the same as the OVP which I think is more meaningful. The OVP has side facing lugs, and the V43 seems to fasten centrally. If you're making a (hopefully) easily assembled gun that is going to have a wooden butt and a tubular body, there's only so many ways you can go about that.
@@tommeakin1732 No, I mean conceptually, the stock detaching at an in-line position on the rear end of the receiver. The locking system is different but the placement is the same. There were plenty of other collapsible stock designs in other SMGs of this period, including the Sten Mk. V which was adopted in place of this gun, but this is the one of the only ones that I know of to use an OVP-style stock. Perhaps it's just a superficial coincidence but it's quite an interesting parallel.
@@jameslawrence2446 "Easily removable" is not the same as "collapsible." A collapsible stock is like what's on the MP7, or on some modern AR platforms (I'm sure there are better examples, but I can't think of others off the top of my head.)
Check out Interwar era subguns in general, a lot have full wooden rifle stocks, finely machined receivers, and not rarely a nice blued finish. The American Thompson is a famous example, because they were the only viable subguns which the US Army could source in any quantity in the beginning of WW2, and there was no simplified economized model yet, those things were extravagantly expensive.
@@0neDoomedSpaceMarine actually, the interwar subguns and pistols, plus some of the semi-auto prototypes, are my favorites. I love the older German machine pistols like the MP-28.
I've got a couple of Mosin bayonets, 1891 and 91/30 patterns that are extremely well finished. Extremely deep blue, no manufacturing marks and low serial numbers. I'd never seen any bayonet as well made as these. They seem as if they just came out of the factory!
Nice looking firearm, but the stock appears way too long. At 33 inches OAL (without bayonet) that is even an inch longer than the Thompson M1A1 with the barrel even shorter than the Thompson (by half an inch). I'm sure they'd have done more to optimize it had the program gone any further.
That was so interesting. I am not knowledgeable about firearms, merely an interested observer. It seems to me that this gun is, indeed, in the Gucci bracket. It's a beauty!
In czech submachinegun was called "kulometná pistole" - literally "machine pistol" so I think he meant to call it like that but mistranslated it into automatic pistol. Btw "Veselý" means "happy" or "jolly" in czech.
Most people outside of the former Czechoslovakia these days are much more familiar with the Czech word _samopal_ for an SMG or an assault rifle, when did terminology change, if you don't mind me asking?
@@F1ghteR41 Term "kulometná pistole", which is technically same as russian "pistolyet pulemyot" or german "maschinepistole", was used before and druing WW2. Afterwards things got a bit chaotic when terms like "samopal" and "automat" were supposed to replace the original term but colided with russian "avtomat" used for assault rifles. There were attempts to distinguish it by calling assault rifles heavy submachineguns but it ended up in adoption of term "samočinný automat" or SA for short for both types of weapons for some reason, resulting in confusion that is still present. I got to look at it again. it is confusing stuff that has more to do with linguistics and political mess...
@@jirja3192 I see, I see. Well, thank you for the insight! It looks like both Czechoslovakia and East Germany kept using the same terms for both the SMG and the 'assault rifle' (despite German having politicaly pretty neutral term Maschinenkarabiner), and so were Romanians until a brief period in the mid-to-late '80s. Poles, on the other hand, kept their term for submachineguns (calqued from the German Maschinenpistole) from pre-war period and called 'assault rifles' simply carbines or automatic carbines, quite alike the Russian definitions. And as far as I get it, the similar thing happened in Hungarian. The Bulgarians, in turn, simply borrowed the Russian term _автомат_ (avtomat). So it seems like if there was any political reasoning in the whole matter, it was either very minimal, or very subtle, or very complicated.
@@F1ghteR41 The political part is with Soviets constantly intervening into Czech weapon development, since they wanted everyone just to make AKs, Simonovs and Tokarevs (ironically czech derivates of Tokarev pistol that were beter than poor vz.52 were rejected by our politicans) but mainly it looked like they tried to avoid adding the term "Assault" to some of their weapons after WW2. Czechs actually did tried to push the term assault rifle or "útočná puška" translated from german "sturmgewehr" but it was rejected. (Side note, Emanuel Holek, creator of ZB vz.26, ZB vz.37 and later Bren and BESA gun used term Stossgewehr and Sturmgewehr back in early 20's for his SMG, trying to unsuccessfully convince Czechoslovak officers who preffered rifles)
@@jirja3192 First of all, I don't think you're being fair in blaming the Soviets here. Czechoslovakia in particular dodged even the basic cartridge standardization for quite a while, keeping 9×19 until the early fifties, 7,92×57 & 7,92×33 until the latter part of the same decade, inventing its own intermediate cartridge amidst all of this and also readopting .32 ACP in the early '60s. So much for the Soviet pressure! And then there's the SA vz. 58, which, while sharing the cartridge, doesn't go even a step further and has a proprietory magazine, and the same goes with the LK vz. 52/57 & UK vz. 59 with their proprietory links. And to be frank, the story of the Czechoslovak TT variants being rejected in favour of problematic, yet fully domestically designed Vz. 52 sounds a lot like the issue of 'not invented here', which is quite the opposite to any foreign pressure. And it looks like they've succeeded, since the only Soviet-designed small arms the ČSLA actually adopted in large quantities were SGM (TK vz. 43) and SVD. Was it for the better? I doubt it, to be fair, and, as the story of the LADA project shows, it was recognized by the military and political leadership as well, albeit too late to change anything. One can also compare and contrast the issue here with what the French got themselves into when sticking to the 7,5×54 and thus FSA Mle 1949/56 with its 10-round magazine, which was clearly inadequate for the rapidly changing battefield. And I wouldn't even get into the similarity of training line of reasoning, which seems to be the driving force of change to the M16/HK416-pattern of weapons among many NATO or NATO-adjacent nations these days. As for the term 'assaul rifle', it goes back before Holek, as at least as early as 1918 it was used by Isaac Lewis in the form of 'assault phase rifle'. And in fairness to the Czechoslovak military, they were far from the only ones who rejected or neglected SMGs at that time.
I especially enjoyed this video and the history around the sub gun, the magazine is very unique and revolutionary for its time, the reload under fir would be stressful.
A boss of mine when I was much younger, drove a Norton 750cc motorcycle, but was rebuilding an older BSA 650. Since I worked in a small engine shop, he happily showed me the torn down BSA engine with the two cylinders going up and down exactly 180° out of sync. I mever did get to see it running, and I wonder how much vibration it had. I recall the two cylinders had a pin connecting them, but I cannot remember exactly how it was arranged in the engine block. BSA sometimes created solutions that weren't the same as everyone else...
6:44 ferguson mention of how blood is not great for historical firearms like these shows his dedication. its not about the danger of getting cut, its about the damage to the gun's condition
The talk of BSA reminded me, I would really love to see you make a video on the BSA autorifle if possible. I remember doing a bunch of research into it a while back and the Internet is really very lacking on much information about it, most sources just saying it's almost identical to the Thompson Autorifle it was based on. However, I tracked down the patent drawings for it and it seems to me to be actually quite significantly different from the Thompson Autorifle and a major improvement in many respects. Again, I would really love to see you talk about it because it's a very interesting seeming rifle to me with very very little coverage online. I'm not sure eif you guys actually have one of them, but seeing as they were tested in British trials, I can't imagine who else would have a surviving example.
@@garymitchell5899 this was a couple years ago now, but iirc I looked at all the info I could find on the gun online, and ran any names associated with the project through a patent database. That or maybe I just shifted through all the patents from BSA, I really can't remember. Unfortunately I can't seem to find where on my computer the PDF is, otherwise I would just give you the patent number. I'll keep an eye out and hopefully I'll find it then give you the number.
I reckon the suomi style ‘coffin’ mag (quad-stack, double-feed) would have all the benefits of a large capacity, but with easier manufacturing. Just put a loading tool in the stock and it’ll work.
Then it would have all the issues with the coffin magazines that caused them to be dropped before the war ended. In the end, despite the numerous attempts by various parties, the high capacity magazines were always problematic at best. A double stack, double feed stick magazine was the way to go. And if you need more ammunition, take two of them.
A fascinating design that it is entirely understandable getting passed over considering that the of the "fast, cheap, or good" questions Britain had to go with fast and cheap.
Sten and Stirling breach had a fixed firing pin, pick up round and fire while moving towards the breach, assuming the second round fired the same the bullet head would be leaving the brass case a lot sooner the the first round fired.
I would guess that the purpose of the 2 position magazine latch is to act as a safety. Absent a means to prevent the bolt from moving to the rear far enough to chamber and fire if dropped, it would keep the ammo out of the way until needed.
In the mid 1980s in elementary school I found a huge old book, one of my favorite books to take out from the schools small library. This UA-cam page is the closest thing I've seen in 40 years to that book from 1950s or 1960s I believe it was an edition of "Guns of the World" or "Small Arms of the World".
About the barrel length - I think it is supposed to be about 10.5" which would be quite ok for aimed single shots for pistol calibre ammo? bear in mind other well known 9mm sub-machine guns with barrels over the common eight inch, like the MP40 at 9.9", the Owen 9.75", Uzi 10.2", Beretta 38A 12.4", Suomi 12.5" and ZK383 at 12.8"...some of these renowned for accurate single shots?
Always wondered why this hasn't been done in the modern age with a modern rifle that has a magazine setup long enough for this given how popular PCCs are nowadays.
@@alltat This is the usual downfall of all these novelty magazines, like quad-stacks, which also appeared about that time. In this case there's also the complicated feed interrupter in the gun itself, that's likely prone to fouling, being that close to chamber of a blowback gun and also to ejection port.
Did anyone see the 3 mags taped side by side in the Swiss rifle from '57? It was in a competition which required stenous action as well as fast accurate shooting.
@@F1ghteR41I would also add that even if it worked flawlessly in trials, these are carefully made individual examples. There is a good chance that mass produced magazines would be much less reliable than the prototypes.
@@88porpoise That is fair, but I was writing under the assumption that it would either became obvious in larger-scale troop trials with serial-made magazines, which would moot any further discussion until the issue would be resolved one way or another, or they would perform more or less as intended, hence the question of the base of comparison would become relevant. STEN was far from the best gun in terms of reliability of feeding, and thus one has to be sceptical towards any reports of such increase with obvious mechanical trouble spots in view regardless, until better (read - less favourite towards the problematic newcomer) comparison could be obtained.
Never understood the 100-200 m sights on 9mm machine pistols ,have them also on my UZI (legally where i live and single shotblocked) and have to aim practically 40 cm low on 25 m and 30 on 50 m ,very helpful on the range 🤦🏻
The sound of assembly & disassembly of this weapon just ooze quality i would imagine it was expensive to manufacture and it was dropped because of this
Jonothan always credits Forgotten Weapons, what a champion 🤙🏽
I love video's with Ian and Johnathan, I wish they would do more video's together just looking at guns.
Would love a forgotten weapon style video with both of them!
Gives a nice mention then flexes on Ian but we have this.
It appears to be entirely mutual too.
I just watched another video where Ian is in Leeds, West Yorkshire, at the Royal armouries.
It made my day, as I live just a couple of miles along the Calder valley, from Leeds so Ian is actually in my neighbourhood!
That's a strange satisfying feeling to know one of my favourite producer is in my neighbourhood.
They're friends IRL
I just love the British way of describing a set of priceless historical prototypes as "we've got five of *these things*"
No value judgement intended 😊
Well, until you suddenly find two thousand of them missing. What comes around, goes around, I guess. 😉
Although, to be fair, I would attribute this to Jonathan's personal manner of speaking, which I find quite charming, and the composition of Royal Armouries collection, which includes a lot of British trials pieces.
I believe it's the genetically ingrained British tendency toward understatement @@F1ghteR41
British modesty: being casually off-hand about your priceless possessions is so much more 'classy' than breathlessly hyping them up. "Yeah, we've got a few old paintings",you say, as you lead them up a staircase past a dozen Vermeers, Rembrandts and Turners.
@@MrHws5mp
Well naturally Hugh, you have similar, everybody has such things. Don't they.
It’s always great when the story is as fascinating as the weapon.
As an aside in the early 80’s I was a draughtsman in an engineering office in enfield on hot days in summer we had the windows wide open to catch some breeze, all day long you could hear the Enfield small arms factory test firing, sounded like the Somme some days
I can imagine.
The sound of whistles blowing, Artillery shells exploding, rapid-fire small arms, machine guns laying down suppressing fire, the screams of the dying, some plummy-voiced git shouting about how some complete bastard has shot his favourite pigeon...
...And then back to work once lunch was over. 🤣
@@peterclarke7240lol I mean they would’ve been testing SA-80’s so that actually sounds pretty accurate.
Where I did my apprenticeship we kept digging up spent ammunition and the odd barrel.
It used to be a ww2 small arms factory.
Did you ever hear the story about experienced Paratroopers going to a sten production plant and being out shot by some of the girls doing production and test firing?
@@michaeldoolan7595Oh, that would not be good for Paratrooper morale! The girls probably told them cheeky Para boys to sod off and then out shot them on the range!
Oh the humiliation would have been unbearable!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Out shot by factory girls!
Failed or not, that is arguably the nicest looking WW2 paratrooper firearm I've ever seen (and the FG-42 is on that list).
Thx for the peek, Jonathan!
Speck savers has a deal on at the moment. Hurry you might be able to get in.
I think the FG wins as the most beautiful Paratrooper Rifle and this wins as the most Beautiful Paratrooper SMG :D
@@trevorfitzgerald4996 Hahaha
Just imagine if this hadn’t failed… We would’ve had 60 rounds, to the MP40’s 32, in a slick SMG. Especially compared to the Sten… (an amazing gun, but it looks like a failed coathanger abortion) It doesn’t beat the FG for looks though. It’s slick, but it’s not *polished oil slick* slick.
man, that double-magazine feeding system thing has gotta be one of the coolest things i've seen all year! fantastic engineering on this thing, sans that magazine safety position.
I thought it was some weird 303 experimental battle rifle at first.
As a Czech, made me very happy seeing that name :)
quite
This is honestly one of the most interesting and unique weapons I've seen, I absolutely love the mechanisms for the double stacked magazine.
Christopher "Dickie" LeStrange-Metcalfe is my new standard for RIDICULOUSLY British names. Also, apparently he lost his commission for cheating at cards!
A proper Cad then.
I had a university lecturer named Paul Teesdale-Spittle.
@@causewaykayakmore of a “bounder” than a cad
@@64mickh 🤔😂😂
Long time viewer, infrequent commenter: I really appreciate that you took the time to record footage for how the mechanisms worked here. Really made me pause what I was doing and pay more attention to the video.
If you'd genuinely seen other videos you'd know he often shows the mechanism
Oh sorry I guess I'm a fake fan for pointing out a thing they put extra effort into that I appreciated lmao
It looks absolutely amazing. The silhouette is so 'lean'! Love that tube design. And barrel shroud reminds me Winchester Model 1897 trench gun.
it doesn't have a pistol grip. fail.
Which also had a useless bayonet !
Indeed
@@deeplorable2913 You don't need a pistol grip to have a good weapon, actually I think guns without them look much nicer than those with them.
@@ELW2940 Not really, bayonets still formed a big role in tactics of the time so it wasn't useless to them.
Now a days with tactics having evolved around Combined Arms Combat and having 30 rounds of death at full auto ready the Bayonet makes less sense.
But for WW2, it makes sense that they had to add it to the design, as this was a requirement for most gun designs at the time, at least in the West.
Lovely seeing the Veselý featured.
The magazines probably cost more than a complete Sten.
Even the sound of it clicking together is well made!😶
Isn't it? Very satisfying to put together.
I thought that's where the magazine was going but the double/single stack rear feed is totally mind-blowing, coffin shaped magazine is somehow quite appropriate. Thx. much. 👍
What a story, what a gun! Having worked with Czech engineers, I get why it’s a unorthodox design that actually works. Don’t know why but it’s a typical Czech thing.
I visited the royal armouries in leeds today, safe to say I was hugely impressed with the collection and the staff, had an interesting chat with one of the performers about star wars
*Jonathan:* "A very nice bayonet for a submachine gun."
*Imperial Japan:* _Heavy breathing_
I was trying to figure out what was up with the magazine all the way up until it was covered, and it's so much more delightfully weird than I could possibly imagine.
fun fact Veselý means Happy in czech
so in translation this gun is Happy 43 which i think is pretty funny
I love this ❤
also in Slovak
More like cheerful.
That sure sounds a bit Chinese 😅
I'd be right happy with 60 rounds of 9mm ready to go in one package.
As an American, I love the British respectfulness!
This gun has given me a lot of inspiration for a project I am working on. Thanks for showing this. Jonathan Ferguson never fails to find or say something that gives me inspiration.
Veseli, in Czech, means Happy or Jovial. The right name for a gun designer.
This thing reminds me heavily of the 1940 S&W Light Rifle. Granted this thing seems like it probably wouldn't break as easy since it's still a pistol caliber.
The Smith & Wesson Light Rifle was also made for 9mm Parabellum. It was finely manufactured but poorly designed, the extra wide magazine well holds a pretty normal looking 9mm magazine, the extra space is just a 'chute' for spitting out empties, and there's a lot of practical problems with all that. Very brittle receiver, not one of S&W's prides.
That’s what I thought this thing was at first.
@@0neDoomedSpaceMarineAlso the S&W wasn't even a full auto, they litterally tried to sell the british millitary a 9mm semi auto carbine like it was 1916.
@@rattlestormrepublic4874 A 9mm semi-auto carbine isn't like the worst idea, if it's closed bolt you can easily get good accuracy out of it and all, but the design for the Light Rifle was just not any good, it would not have benefited from having full-auto fire given its fragility.
Mind, the vast majority of soldiers in WW2 were armed with bolt-action rifles, so a working semi-auto pistol caliber carbine would still have a pretty substantial advantage for CQB given the speed and capacity. Of course, an actual subgun would do that and more, and the Light Rifle was categorically inferior to any of the common subguns in WW2, categorically inferior to a Hi-Point carbine, really.
All pre- CNC, beautiful engineering, built by craftsman.
Very interesting concept to have a 60 round 9mm magazine at the same height and width of a 30 round magazine. Wish some others would’ve developed this concept further if it works reliably
Love the simplicity and beauty of stamped sheet metal gun . Beautiful bluing on this gun as well.
It would have been awesome if the haversack had a V-42 dagger as used by the US/Canadian Devil's Brigade sheathed on the side of it. The complete package.
It would have had a Sykes.
me too (I have several) but the gun is also a V-42@@handlesarefeckinstupid
The collapsible stock design of this submachine gun is almost identical to the Italian OVP, an SMG which had been designed in 1917 as a personal defence weapon for Italian aviation crews. Very similar guns conceptually, and I wonder whether Veselý was somehow influenced by the OVP.
It was
By "collapsible stock"? I guess you mean the butt and the way it fastens to the body? My guess is that you're reading a bit too far into that. The the way it fastens to the body is not the same as the OVP which I think is more meaningful. The OVP has side facing lugs, and the V43 seems to fasten centrally.
If you're making a (hopefully) easily assembled gun that is going to have a wooden butt and a tubular body, there's only so many ways you can go about that.
@@tommeakin1732 No, I mean conceptually, the stock detaching at an in-line position on the rear end of the receiver. The locking system is different but the placement is the same. There were plenty of other collapsible stock designs in other SMGs of this period, including the Sten Mk. V which was adopted in place of this gun, but this is the one of the only ones that I know of to use an OVP-style stock. Perhaps it's just a superficial coincidence but it's quite an interesting parallel.
@@jameslawrence2446 "Easily removable" is not the same as "collapsible." A collapsible stock is like what's on the MP7, or on some modern AR platforms (I'm sure there are better examples, but I can't think of others off the top of my head.)
Appreciate the great info. Would like more detailed close-ups. Thankyou
“Oh, it’s a video on a cool looking gun…”. No, it’s a history lesson.👍🏼
Fascinating. Thank you for showing this. That weapon clicks together deliciously.
i wouldnt mind having one
So, it's basically bolt-hold-open but for rear stack of rounds, until forward column is depleted.
Beautiful. I've always wondered what some of the various weapons would look like with a finish like that instead of the practical military finish.
Check out Interwar era subguns in general, a lot have full wooden rifle stocks, finely machined receivers, and not rarely a nice blued finish. The American Thompson is a famous example, because they were the only viable subguns which the US Army could source in any quantity in the beginning of WW2, and there was no simplified economized model yet, those things were extravagantly expensive.
@@0neDoomedSpaceMarine actually, the interwar subguns and pistols, plus some of the semi-auto prototypes, are my favorites. I love the older German machine pistols like the MP-28.
If you check the guys that do parade rifles.Some really nice polished up 1903 and M1 rifles
That gun went together with some satisfying clicks.
amazing back story as always Jonathan
I've got a couple of Mosin bayonets, 1891 and 91/30 patterns that are extremely well finished. Extremely deep blue, no manufacturing marks and low serial numbers. I'd never seen any bayonet as well made as these. They seem as if they just came out of the factory!
The finish on that gun really is lovely.
At first glance I thought it was in .30 Carbine. That magazine looks like a feeding nightmare
Disassembly catch. I enjoy hearing things described using terms that I absolutely understand but don't regularly use.
Nice looking firearm, but the stock appears way too long. At 33 inches OAL (without bayonet) that is even an inch longer than the Thompson M1A1 with the barrel even shorter than the Thompson (by half an inch). I'm sure they'd have done more to optimize it had the program gone any further.
Brilliant, now I really want to see this being fired
I just imagined a Spectre SMG with this mag system and i've realized it would be REALLY heavy.
This is one of those "they were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, that they never considered whether or not they SHOULD."
At first glance i would have said modified/simplified Lanchester, I did not know this one existed.
I will visit the museums when in the U.K.! Can't wait.
In A word, Fascinating.................Thanks.
Brilliant rundown! Well done loading that magazine. 😂
That was so interesting. I am not knowledgeable about firearms, merely an interested observer. It seems to me that this gun is, indeed, in the Gucci bracket. It's a beauty!
Holy Bovine, Sir! Your weapons are so interesting and well explained. Good on you!
Fascinating stuff as always.
Interesting story and development of that 'double barrel' SMG magazine.
I learned something new looking at this video! Thanks!
Interesting, thank you, and thanks for sorting out the lighting. I can see the fine details now 🤘
This is quite awesome, to bad they don't use this in modern firearms. The magazine engineering good be useful today.
Fascinating ! Thank you.
In czech submachinegun was called "kulometná pistole" - literally "machine pistol" so I think he meant to call it like that but mistranslated it into automatic pistol.
Btw "Veselý" means "happy" or "jolly" in czech.
Most people outside of the former Czechoslovakia these days are much more familiar with the Czech word _samopal_ for an SMG or an assault rifle, when did terminology change, if you don't mind me asking?
@@F1ghteR41 Term "kulometná pistole", which is technically same as russian "pistolyet pulemyot" or german "maschinepistole", was used before and druing WW2. Afterwards things got a bit chaotic when terms like "samopal" and "automat" were supposed to replace the original term but colided with russian "avtomat" used for assault rifles. There were attempts to distinguish it by calling assault rifles heavy submachineguns but it ended up in adoption of term "samočinný automat" or SA for short for both types of weapons for some reason, resulting in confusion that is still present.
I got to look at it again. it is confusing stuff that has more to do with linguistics and political mess...
@@jirja3192 I see, I see. Well, thank you for the insight!
It looks like both Czechoslovakia and East Germany kept using the same terms for both the SMG and the 'assault rifle' (despite German having politicaly pretty neutral term Maschinenkarabiner), and so were Romanians until a brief period in the mid-to-late '80s. Poles, on the other hand, kept their term for submachineguns (calqued from the German Maschinenpistole) from pre-war period and called 'assault rifles' simply carbines or automatic carbines, quite alike the Russian definitions. And as far as I get it, the similar thing happened in Hungarian. The Bulgarians, in turn, simply borrowed the Russian term _автомат_ (avtomat).
So it seems like if there was any political reasoning in the whole matter, it was either very minimal, or very subtle, or very complicated.
@@F1ghteR41 The political part is with Soviets constantly intervening into Czech weapon development, since they wanted everyone just to make AKs, Simonovs and Tokarevs (ironically czech derivates of Tokarev pistol that were beter than poor vz.52 were rejected by our politicans) but mainly it looked like they tried to avoid adding the term "Assault" to some of their weapons after WW2. Czechs actually did tried to push the term assault rifle or "útočná puška" translated from german "sturmgewehr" but it was rejected.
(Side note, Emanuel Holek, creator of ZB vz.26, ZB vz.37 and later Bren and BESA gun used term Stossgewehr and Sturmgewehr back in early 20's for his SMG, trying to unsuccessfully convince Czechoslovak officers who preffered rifles)
@@jirja3192 First of all, I don't think you're being fair in blaming the Soviets here. Czechoslovakia in particular dodged even the basic cartridge standardization for quite a while, keeping 9×19 until the early fifties, 7,92×57 & 7,92×33 until the latter part of the same decade, inventing its own intermediate cartridge amidst all of this and also readopting .32 ACP in the early '60s. So much for the Soviet pressure!
And then there's the SA vz. 58, which, while sharing the cartridge, doesn't go even a step further and has a proprietory magazine, and the same goes with the LK vz. 52/57 & UK vz. 59 with their proprietory links. And to be frank, the story of the Czechoslovak TT variants being rejected in favour of problematic, yet fully domestically designed Vz. 52 sounds a lot like the issue of 'not invented here', which is quite the opposite to any foreign pressure. And it looks like they've succeeded, since the only Soviet-designed small arms the ČSLA actually adopted in large quantities were SGM (TK vz. 43) and SVD. Was it for the better? I doubt it, to be fair, and, as the story of the LADA project shows, it was recognized by the military and political leadership as well, albeit too late to change anything.
One can also compare and contrast the issue here with what the French got themselves into when sticking to the 7,5×54 and thus FSA Mle 1949/56 with its 10-round magazine, which was clearly inadequate for the rapidly changing battefield. And I wouldn't even get into the similarity of training line of reasoning, which seems to be the driving force of change to the M16/HK416-pattern of weapons among many NATO or NATO-adjacent nations these days.
As for the term 'assaul rifle', it goes back before Holek, as at least as early as 1918 it was used by Isaac Lewis in the form of 'assault phase rifle'. And in fairness to the Czechoslovak military, they were far from the only ones who rejected or neglected SMGs at that time.
I especially enjoyed this video and the history around the sub gun, the magazine is very unique and revolutionary for its time, the reload under fir would be stressful.
I wonder about the dirt and mud trials? That was a complicated box to have to clean out. 😮
A boss of mine when I was much younger, drove a Norton 750cc motorcycle, but was rebuilding an older BSA 650. Since I worked in a small engine shop, he happily showed me the torn down BSA engine with the two cylinders going up and down exactly 180° out of sync. I mever did get to see it running, and I wonder how much vibration it had. I recall the two cylinders had a pin connecting them, but I cannot remember exactly how it was arranged in the engine block. BSA sometimes created solutions that weren't the same as everyone else...
Excellent work, excellent video
This is the most interesting new firearm I have seen in ages.
6:44 ferguson mention of how blood is not great for historical firearms like these shows his dedication. its not about the danger of getting cut, its about the damage to the gun's condition
He doesn't want to bleed ON his art.
Yup, you'd lend him tools readily enough.
I’m going to be going to the museum in leads soon as I’m on a college study abroad program and I can’t wait to see everything that is on display
If these are officially "machine carbines" it's interesting that they actually say "sub machine gun" on the side.. 😁
The talk of BSA reminded me, I would really love to see you make a video on the BSA autorifle if possible. I remember doing a bunch of research into it a while back and the Internet is really very lacking on much information about it, most sources just saying it's almost identical to the Thompson Autorifle it was based on. However, I tracked down the patent drawings for it and it seems to me to be actually quite significantly different from the Thompson Autorifle and a major improvement in many respects. Again, I would really love to see you talk about it because it's a very interesting seeming rifle to me with very very little coverage online. I'm not sure eif you guys actually have one of them, but seeing as they were tested in British trials, I can't imagine who else would have a surviving example.
Where did you find the patent drawings?
@@garymitchell5899 this was a couple years ago now, but iirc I looked at all the info I could find on the gun online, and ran any names associated with the project through a patent database. That or maybe I just shifted through all the patents from BSA, I really can't remember. Unfortunately I can't seem to find where on my computer the PDF is, otherwise I would just give you the patent number. I'll keep an eye out and hopefully I'll find it then give you the number.
Ah, yes. The Thompson auto rifle...
Thinking of this rifle always makes me blish.
Never mind any of the "firearms fanboy" stuff; what a wonderful piece of engineering.
Would have been better with a normal mag. I like it.
No matter what…it is a genuine thing of beauty
I reckon the suomi style ‘coffin’ mag (quad-stack, double-feed) would have all the benefits of a large capacity, but with easier manufacturing. Just put a loading tool in the stock and it’ll work.
Then it would have all the issues with the coffin magazines that caused them to be dropped before the war ended.
In the end, despite the numerous attempts by various parties, the high capacity magazines were always problematic at best. A double stack, double feed stick magazine was the way to go. And if you need more ammunition, take two of them.
That thing has some beautiful aesthetics.
A fascinating design that it is entirely understandable getting passed over considering that the of the "fast, cheap, or good" questions Britain had to go with fast and cheap.
13 EM-1/2 rifles casually sitting behind him!
If you add a little bit more light to the scenario would be very good, is a bit dark. Anyway amazing vídeo 😅
This gun has all the satisfying clicks. I suppose machining of those prototypes has been top notch.
Sten and Stirling breach had a fixed firing pin, pick up round and fire while moving towards the breach, assuming the second round fired the same the bullet head would be leaving the brass case a lot sooner the the first round fired.
What a neat gun! I really like the aesthetics of it.
I would guess that the purpose of the 2 position magazine latch is to act as a safety. Absent a means to prevent the bolt from moving to the rear far enough to chamber and fire if dropped, it would keep the ammo out of the way until needed.
Great video
What calibre is it ?
Part FG42 and part Sterling! Great Video 😀
great story/facts
In the mid 1980s in elementary school I found a huge old book, one of my favorite books to take out from the schools small library. This UA-cam page is the closest thing I've seen in 40 years to that book from 1950s or 1960s I believe it was an edition of "Guns of the World" or "Small Arms of the World".
That magazine makes it look like a larger calibre than it is. Thought it looked like a proto-assault rifle.
Very cool, keep up the good work
About the barrel length - I think it is supposed to be about 10.5" which would be quite ok for aimed single shots for pistol calibre ammo? bear in mind other well known 9mm sub-machine guns with barrels over the common eight inch, like the MP40 at 9.9", the Owen 9.75", Uzi 10.2", Beretta 38A 12.4", Suomi 12.5" and ZK383 at 12.8"...some of these renowned for accurate single shots?
It looks like the 1940 S&W light rifle. Thats what i thought it was to start with.
Forcing the paratrooper to attach the shoulder stock in landing seems silly when folding and telescoping stocks had already been developed.
They also pretty much universally suck as stocks.
Can you perhaps do a show , comparing Patchet's Sterling design to the Sten, and what made it so much better than the Sten?
Nice video as always. Can we expect 4k in future videos?
Always wondered why this hasn't been done in the modern age with a modern rifle that has a magazine setup long enough for this given how popular PCCs are nowadays.
Reliability in the field. A soldier would rather have two 30 round magazines that always work than one 60 round magazine that almost always works.
@@alltat This is the usual downfall of all these novelty magazines, like quad-stacks, which also appeared about that time. In this case there's also the complicated feed interrupter in the gun itself, that's likely prone to fouling, being that close to chamber of a blowback gun and also to ejection port.
Did anyone see the 3 mags taped side by side in the Swiss rifle from '57?
It was in a competition which required stenous action as well as fast accurate shooting.
@@F1ghteR41I would also add that even if it worked flawlessly in trials, these are carefully made individual examples. There is a good chance that mass produced magazines would be much less reliable than the prototypes.
@@88porpoise That is fair, but I was writing under the assumption that it would either became obvious in larger-scale troop trials with serial-made magazines, which would moot any further discussion until the issue would be resolved one way or another, or they would perform more or less as intended, hence the question of the base of comparison would become relevant. STEN was far from the best gun in terms of reliability of feeding, and thus one has to be sceptical towards any reports of such increase with obvious mechanical trouble spots in view regardless, until better (read - less favourite towards the problematic newcomer) comparison could be obtained.
Absolutely Fascinating. Donate - well its well worth considering for such a high grade production.
Never understood the 100-200 m sights on 9mm machine pistols ,have them also on my UZI (legally where i live and single shotblocked) and have to aim practically 40 cm low on 25 m and 30 on 50 m ,very helpful on the range 🤦🏻
Great Grandfather, what did you do in the war?
I made butt sacks.
Vesély Airborne prototype?
I would love to spend an afternoon looking around there 👌
VAP stands for Very Awesome Pew
This would be an interesting design to revisit
The M1940 S&W "light rifle" rejected by the MOD would look great hanging next to it in a hall of fail.
Very nice idea on that magazine.
The sound of assembly & disassembly of this weapon just ooze quality i would imagine it was expensive to manufacture and it was dropped because of this