So anti ackerman doesnt only work on high downforce vehicles but also carts. Lets just say we could change the steering geometry and tie rod lenght and angle on a roadcar, could we also achieve higher corner grip? Because he said in the video roadcars would be terrible to drive slow and fast so what gives? Why is it faster on certain vehicles but not on others?
@@andrejrockshox Ackerman is what make it possible for F1 to make the hairpin at Monaco. It would make it easier to park you car I guess? Roadcars go so slow it barely matters tbh
as far as I understand, Anti-Ackerman actually REDUCES tire-wear on the inside tire because the outside tire is driving with a certain amount of slip angle and therefore the inside tire is actually not scrubbing over the tarmac at all. The normal Ackermann behaviour would lead to massive amounts of scrubbing, because the outside tire does all of the work and the inside tire would just understeer
Yup, a slight explanatory error in the video. Kinda surprised they didn't catch this while filming or editing. But, Ackerman is one of the more niche setup topics out there (like Castor in karts), so it's understandable.
The ackermann optimizes the grip. Not just affecting the outer tire but also the inner. It can be spotted on the graph. The simple fact that the dashed line is not vertical shows that some type of ackermann would optimize the grip. With less tire load (inner tire because of load transfer) the tire needs less slip angle to get to its peak performance -> anti-ackermann.
Positive Ackerman would perhap increase tyre wear on a track, but to clarify, I imagine in a road-going car, exercising next to no slip angle, positive Ackerman would surely result in very low tyre wear
@@matthewmcewen1 It helps a bit in road cars. But actually, Ackerman has surprisingly little influence on tyre wear with road cars, because on normal road cars most tyre wear occurs in straight line running. In fact, most road cars don't have 100% positive Ackerman, hence most cars squeal horribly in multi-story car parks... What Ackerman does do is change your steering feel rather dramatically, so road car designers tend to choose the Ackerman that gives them the best steering feel. The other thing negative Ackerman does to road cars is to increase the turning circle, which incurs the wrath of the marketing department. Even in F1 the dramatic change in steering feel cannot be ignored, and can present limits to how far the designers will push radical Ackerman settings. (And look at Monaco races, to see if you think negative Ackerman is being run there...)
I have Anti Akerman setup from factory on my Giulia Quadrifoglio. This is a great video explaining why it’s used as it is and how it works. At low speed on cold tyres and high steering input you can fee the front end skipping
Thats so cool to see it incorporated into road car tech, its probably one of the base reasons why the Quad gets such great reviews out of its driving experience outside of the more well known theatrics!
@@ggbirdymill1618 not too bad. Bought the car with tyres that needed replacing soon, replaced them 12 months ago and done about 8-10k mile. Still loads of life left in them. Hope for at least another 10k before they need replacing again
Regular Giulia owner here. I can actually feel the wheel slip at low speed when I tried to make a sharp turn. Maybe ordinary ones also have Anti Akerman. The regular Giulia is known for being a huge bang for the buck in terms of driving experience and it shares most components with the QV. If it also has anti American setup that would be nuts.
Sorry but I think you missed the key reason. The reason stays in the graph 5:53 “Line of peaks” Before load transfer, assuming 6000N on each side, and after 2000 of load transfer, outer wheel can accept more steering angle while inner wheel needs less steering angle to keep maximum. I can’t agree that F1 cars use anti-ackerman because they rely on outside tire. They do on both tires, trying to maximize total grip.(anti ackerman offers the peak grip by finding optimum slide angle on each tires)
The way I understand it for a track car set-up is for keeping the proper wheel track while pushing the limits. The outside wheel under load will pull out while the inside with little load will actually end up turning in more. So when not under load it looks weird with outside turning more but under race load it tracks correctly.
It's exactly as scott said. The tyre with more load will be able to use more of the slip angle. The outside tyre is the one with most of the load. How I understood your statement is that in ur mind the steering system angle is ther for bumpsteer correction. This is not the case because correctly designed cars don't have bumpsteer that needs to be corrected. The slip angle was very well explained in this video. More load more slip angle.
I just noticed recently that Driver61's video about Alonso's bizarre steering technique was taken down. It's such a shame, I would love to rewatch that video after watching this video.
@@rodolfoptx yeah everyone else uses those timers to skip the sponsored ads, nobody wants too hear every single UA-camr shipping the exact same vpn sponsor deal every video, its actually painful to watch
I like it for a long wheelbase, heavier front end truck, as well. It's already "pointy" in front. Improve the outer wheel for weight transfer and stability in the turn. Along with better weight balance throughout the truck/SUV, and you get better handling. Especially with plus-tires that handle more weight/ load; go the sway bar, coilover, equalized setup route, and it's hanging with sedans, anywhere.
There's also a significant aerodynamic reason for the F1 teams to run anti-ackerman; a shallower angle of attack on the inside wheel means that the wheel wake of the inside wheel is not sent as far inboard, thereby wreaking less havoc aerodynamically downstream.
Oof, hopefully Driver61 wont be accepting Established Titles sponsorships in the future with all the evidence coming out of Established Titles being a scam.
so in general anti-akerman used to reduce outside wheel slip angle because its contribute more then inside wheel on cornering on F1 speeds and to have overal slip angle less to lessen chanses to lose a grip?
Usually done by having the steering gearbox and the control arms ahead of the front axle while for Ackerman everything is behind the front axle. But its F1... they'll have some complicated solutions🤷♂.
Ackerman steering was a question thrown at me during an interview for a university place. No idea what it was at the time, especially since the place I was going for was computer studies. I failed. But my major car concern right then was all the water leaking out of the radiator on my journey over. My first car, a 1959 Ford 100E, reg no 2668 CR. Would love to have you back.
The white line simulation reminds me of Andy Green and Thrust SSC/Bloodhound LSR going over 600MPH. I wonder what they used on the Ackerman angles. I wish I had asked Richard Noble this when I met him!
The ThrustSSC was steered with two rear wheels behing each other in the middle of the car, so no Ackerman involved. Don't know about the Bloodhound though.
Scott, would you be able to do a feature on the 2026 F1 power unit rules? They seem to be pushing the cars into more lit-and-coast and burning fuel to generate electricity, possibly making the racing worse.
Forward or backward placement of the steering rack is the best way to control Ackerman, but you can also adjust it a little with the position of the steering arms on the knuckle.
been watching your channel for a while.. this is the best to show my students on how a car works,,,,a few will drop out of class.. they just want'a'be a racer bmw driver.. the ones that stay are the best students.. they dont race on the road,, and they always tell me about there driving exp.. how the car handled with this or that.. the ones that dropped out.. well thru the grapevine.. they get lots of tickets,, and a few have wrecked there( or daddys ) car,,,great channel,,keep it going
For dirt racing, I adjusted the Ackerman to work in reverse, so the wheels pointed the right way when the car went sideways. Edit: I split the cross steering arm in the middle and had adjustment holes in a pivoting 'spade' arrangement.
For road or other than F1 cars with FrWD or FWD front tires not only steer, but also drive, and use of front differentials enhances this even more, so different principles apply to steering
"Painted" = Patent. That had me confused for a moment. How is this even mechanically possible on a daily commuter vehicle... And is this possible with most Trucks, SUVs and Crossovers since they have stabilizer and anti roll bars?
I would like for you to analyze Fernando Alonso's driving style ( well, prior to 2022 ) with respect to slip angle, and how he had the team setup his car. As I recall, he used to put a LOT of steering input on corner entry, almost a "jab" or "excessive turn input" for a brief moment as if to put heat into the fronts.
More likely the sudden jab adds some weight transfer and gives the fronts a bit more grip to initiate the rotation of the car. It's safer to get the same effect with a jab of brakes, but then it takes away from the traction budget.
Another racing category that would benefit from anti-Ackerman is drifting. In drifting, you generally turn the wheel opposite in the direction the car is going, so you need the leading tire to turn less and the trailing tire to turn MORE to actually track the curve of the corner correctly and scrub the trailing tire less, therefore maintaining more front grip and control.
I think this video really would have benefited from a simple top-down animation of the starring assembly geometry, with lines to indicate the forward direction of the tires. I think the concept is easier to grasp when you realize that even with a positive or negative Ackerman geometry the tires do remain straight when the steering is neutral, and the difference in the angles only occurs in the geometry when steering.
Tune to win by Caroll Smith has it all, and maybe the graph shown of slip angle vs lateral force isn't really of a slick tyre, it's more representative of a passenger car tyre.
Fun fact - the Lotus Excel has neutral steering to improve higher-speed handling. Consequently the wheels judder badly in low-speed manoeuvres like parking, particularly in reverse. I experience this using an Excel as my everyday car.
Parallel steering: Wheels turn at the same degree Ackerman (Lankensperger) steering: Inside tire turns more than the outside; to avoid scrubbing/wearing out the tire and turning better ex: Road cars Anti-Ackerman (Anti-Lankensperger) steering: Outside tire turns more than the inside; creates lots of scrubbing, but the outside tire can handle more slip angle and have more force to push the tire and have more grip. ex: Formula One cars
I thought the reduced slip angle on the unweighted (or lesser weighted) is inside tyre was to increase its contribution to cornering force because it is in the performance window where the turning angle brings the tyre into a slip angle where it can contribute to lateral force, instead of just scrubbing off speed, though some scrubbing can help to rotate the car. To help the inside tyre do this, suspension geometry can be set to reduce the camber on the inside tyre so the contact patch is bigger. The contact patch of the outside tyre is increased by the vertical load and tyre deformation so increased camber stops the inside of the tyre from lifting
Tires don't necessarily have a higher saturation peak with more load. Some race tires have a negative trend, with more Fz resulting in a lower saturation peak. Either way the deltas are not big on actual tires most of the time.
@@ArchOfficial what I'm referring to is the effect of REDUCING vertical load on the inside tyre. Without enough load for a given steering angle, the tyre will skid. Anti-ackerman reduces the steering angle to avoid this
Hey @Driver61 could you maybe do a video on F1 running 4 cylinder engines. I know that might not be everyone's cup of tea and the chances of running v10's 12's or even 8's being so slim, if you look at how powerful bmw's 4 cylinder f1 engine was that brabham and Benetton used and how successful the Japan Super Formula series is with their 4 cylinders I'm sure F1 could make a success out of it. Sure the engines that is used in the Japan Super Formula series doesn't rev as high as F1 today but in my opinion they sound better. With the planned removal of the mgu-h and an inline 4 cylinder being slimmer than a V6 it could possibly mean slimmer and shorter as well as lighter cars. The Japan Super Formula cars weigh only 660kg with the driver included. Also manufacturers like Mercedes, Redbull with Honda and Renault for Alpine all have big experience and great success with 4 cylinders, I'm not sure of Ferrari but even the new comer Audi or at least VW has experience and success with 4 cylinders so that would mean no team would have a major advantage by being more experienced with those engines and it would be something fresh for F1. Also there were talks of increasing the power output of the mgu-k so with a 2l turbo 4 cylinder engine that makes about 600hp (not impossible the super gt cars make 600- 650hp and uses the same engine as the super formula) with the mgu-k you could be looking at 800 - 900hp in total.
Inline engines can't be stressed members of the chassis and so need reinforcement, pretty much the reason they've disappeared. V4s are, unfortunately, an Elephant in the room, it's just cheaper and more straightforward to make Inline 4s for road cars where performance doesn't matter that much, because of that they have no road relevance for cars (not considering bikes, ofc).
@@afoxwithahat7846 I understand what you're saying but if Japan Super Formula can make a success out of them then F1 could too considering the money, resources and technology F1 engineers possess. Also look at the new c63 amg that uses a 4 cylinder and makes over 600hp to counter your argument of performance for those engines don't matter much on road cars. Lotus for another example uses 4 cylinder engines for how long now and are great cars to drive on the street and take to the track. The A45 amg is still the most powerful production hatchback on the road. Alot of private owned race car companies still use 4 cylinder engines for their track cars like the Honda K series or the Ford Duratec engine. Also look at Super GT and DTM before DTM switched over to Gt3 cars they had major success with 4 cylinders. Rally cars also still use 4 cylinder engines. Also if inline 4's are cheaper to produce that could invite more manufacturers to F1.
Charles: My steering wheel is broken Ferrari: Okay we are checking *Engineer pulls up this video* Ferrari: Okay it only looks broken but it is totally normal Charles: *crashes* Beautiful, Fucking Beautiful
I'd imagine the process would be something like this: Driver experience (Understand what the driver wants) - Analysis of current/previous designs (What works, what needs to be improved) - 3D models/FEA/Prototypes - Analysis of results - What went well, what needs to be improved, driver feedback - Necessary modifications/adaptions to steering system - Repeat until happy and ready to manufacture. Most of the important information and hard work would be built on top of existing information/data and understanding what the driver of the F1 car needs, then its just a case of design and implementation, which for the Engineers in F1 is just another day at the office :)
Hey! I think you have the best explanation of understeer (and potentially oversteer)/slip angle I've seen yet! A layman (regarding car/racing knowledge) can understand the concept of the wheel being pointed farther than the real steering direction with this explanation. Might you do a stand-alone video explaining this? It would be a useful resource for explaining the concept
As a skier who learned backcountry, I taught at Vail one year and they teach anti-Ackerman but it’s slower and I set the staff daily vertical feet record for the season one year skiing Ackerman wedge down backbowl pitches
I feel like this is the kind of topic which requires a longer video and some in-situation examples. It's fascinating but a crash course is way too short for this 😥. Thanks though I learned something interesting today !
01:45 It looks like some dope machinery. Instead of Pirelli it had wood. And 1 wheel in front (for steering) and 1 in the back. It really needed to turn fast. Especially when carried in hand. Amazing! 👍 The steering wheel looks badass! Without LED.
Yup I always test the car Ackerman when I first drive it. Just to get the feeling. Personally I love some anti Ackerman, but that's just a personal preference
Must've been hard to do a front end alignment on a horse.
Oh how times have changed haha
Lol
No, actually it's super easy, barely an inconvenience.
Nothing a hammer can't fix, call Clarkson
@@Tminus89 a hammer solves all as we know 🔨
Adjusting Ackerman is one of the most underrated setup changes on karts as well
not adjustable on my kart
So anti ackerman doesnt only work on high downforce vehicles but also carts.
Lets just say we could change the steering geometry and tie rod lenght and angle on a roadcar, could we also achieve higher corner grip?
Because he said in the video roadcars would be terrible to drive slow and fast so what gives?
Why is it faster on certain vehicles but not on others?
@@benistingray6097 it is only good if you intent to push the car to the limits all the time. and that you dont do on public roads.
@@andrejrockshox Ackerman is what make it possible for F1 to make the hairpin at Monaco.
It would make it easier to park you car I guess?
Roadcars go so slow it barely matters tbh
@@rimka11 depends on What year your kart is, my is very old im gonna change it soon
This is exactly why I love this channel, I learn things that I never imagined existed! Thank you!
Same here. Gives F1 tech videos on the F1 channel a run for their money. Great stuff
Well, they explained ackermann and tyre wear wrong. But overall it's possible to learn things
I second that!
I have my steering setup to Levi Ackerman
I loved your overhead simulator example, it really cleared it up
as far as I understand, Anti-Ackerman actually REDUCES tire-wear on the inside tire because the outside tire is driving with a certain amount of slip angle and therefore the inside tire is actually not scrubbing over the tarmac at all. The normal Ackermann behaviour would lead to massive amounts of scrubbing, because the outside tire does all of the work and the inside tire would just understeer
Yep, correct. Glad someone spotted this!
Yup, a slight explanatory error in the video. Kinda surprised they didn't catch this while filming or editing. But, Ackerman is one of the more niche setup topics out there (like Castor in karts), so it's understandable.
The ackermann optimizes the grip. Not just affecting the outer tire but also the inner. It can be spotted on the graph. The simple fact that the dashed line is not vertical shows that some type of ackermann would optimize the grip. With less tire load (inner tire because of load transfer) the tire needs less slip angle to get to its peak performance -> anti-ackermann.
Positive Ackerman would perhap increase tyre wear on a track, but to clarify, I imagine in a road-going car, exercising next to no slip angle, positive Ackerman would surely result in very low tyre wear
@@matthewmcewen1 It helps a bit in road cars. But actually, Ackerman has surprisingly little influence on tyre wear with road cars, because on normal road cars most tyre wear occurs in straight line running. In fact, most road cars don't have 100% positive Ackerman, hence most cars squeal horribly in multi-story car parks... What Ackerman does do is change your steering feel rather dramatically, so road car designers tend to choose the Ackerman that gives them the best steering feel. The other thing negative Ackerman does to road cars is to increase the turning circle, which incurs the wrath of the marketing department. Even in F1 the dramatic change in steering feel cannot be ignored, and can present limits to how far the designers will push radical Ackerman settings. (And look at Monaco races, to see if you think negative Ackerman is being run there...)
Established titles is a scam. You should look them up further and not support a scam company.
Established Titles is a SCAM! Be careful when accepting sponsors!
I have Anti Akerman setup from factory on my Giulia Quadrifoglio.
This is a great video explaining why it’s used as it is and how it works. At low speed on cold tyres and high steering input you can fee the front end skipping
Thats so cool to see it incorporated into road car tech, its probably one of the base reasons why the Quad gets such great reviews out of its driving experience outside of the more well known theatrics!
How is your tire wear? Do they get used up quicker?
@@ggbirdymill1618 not too bad. Bought the car with tyres that needed replacing soon, replaced them 12 months ago and done about 8-10k mile. Still loads of life left in them. Hope for at least another 10k before they need replacing again
@@dannyrobbo That really isn't bad at all 👍🏻
Regular Giulia owner here. I can actually feel the wheel slip at low speed when I tried to make a sharp turn. Maybe ordinary ones also have Anti Akerman. The regular Giulia is known for being a huge bang for the buck in terms of driving experience and it shares most components with the QV. If it also has anti American setup that would be nuts.
short answer: to maximize the slip angle effectiveness for each tyre
Ty
Sorry but I think you missed the key reason. The reason stays in the graph 5:53 “Line of peaks” Before load transfer, assuming 6000N on each side, and after 2000 of load transfer, outer wheel can accept more steering angle while inner wheel needs less steering angle to keep maximum. I can’t agree that F1 cars use anti-ackerman because they rely on outside tire. They do on both tires, trying to maximize total grip.(anti ackerman offers the peak grip by finding optimum slide angle on each tires)
The way I understand it for a track car set-up is for keeping the proper wheel track while pushing the limits. The outside wheel under load will pull out while the inside with little load will actually end up turning in more. So when not under load it looks weird with outside turning more but under race load it tracks correctly.
It's exactly as scott said. The tyre with more load will be able to use more of the slip angle. The outside tyre is the one with most of the load. How I understood your statement is that in ur mind the steering system angle is ther for bumpsteer correction. This is not the case because correctly designed cars don't have bumpsteer that needs to be corrected. The slip angle was very well explained in this video. More load more slip angle.
RIP to that Established Titles sponsorship😅
I just noticed recently that Driver61's video about Alonso's bizarre steering technique was taken down. It's such a shame, I would love to rewatch that video after watching this video.
I was looking for that but couldn't find it
Kudos to Scott for having an advert timer bar just like donut so you know just were to skip too 🙌
The intent of the timer bar is exactly the opposite: making us know that the ad won't take too long 🤫
@@rodolfoptx yeah everyone else uses those timers to skip the sponsored ads, nobody wants too hear every single UA-camr shipping the exact same vpn sponsor deal every video, its actually painful to watch
@@roryevans4295 Keep it quiet, man. We're screwed if they find that out 😆
I like it for a long wheelbase, heavier front end truck, as well. It's already "pointy" in front. Improve the outer wheel for weight transfer and stability in the turn. Along with better weight balance throughout the truck/SUV, and you get better handling. Especially with plus-tires that handle more weight/ load; go the sway bar, coilover, equalized setup route, and it's hanging with sedans, anywhere.
There's also a significant aerodynamic reason for the F1 teams to run anti-ackerman; a shallower angle of attack on the inside wheel means that the wheel wake of the inside wheel is not sent as far inboard, thereby wreaking less havoc aerodynamically downstream.
Dang I didn’t even think about wheel wake lol
Now that established titles is a scam, you need to re-upload this without the ad.
You explained it in such a great manner, thank you for this beautiful video!
Oof, hopefully Driver61 wont be accepting Established Titles sponsorships in the future with all the evidence coming out of Established Titles being a scam.
so in general anti-akerman used to reduce outside wheel slip angle because its contribute more then inside wheel on cornering on F1 speeds and to have overal slip angle less to lessen chanses to lose a grip?
Everyone knows that Established Titles thing is a scam, right? Shame to see it promoted here.
It is?? I never bought into but I was considering it. How do you know it's a scam?
Muta SOG just cancelled this sponsor since Established Titles is a scam
Frindly reminder that buying a tiny plot of land does NOT give you a title, that ad is a lie
Established tittles is a giant scam.
How is the anti-Ackerman steering accomplished mechanically?
Usually done by having the steering gearbox and the control arms ahead of the front axle while for Ackerman everything is behind the front axle. But its F1... they'll have some complicated solutions🤷♂.
Search for anti ackermann and read the analysis by f1dataanalysis
@@NassimFTW Thx!
It's the angle of the steering arms between the rack and the upright. Bob Bolles has a good description of it in his book.
I love this channel!
Even go-karts steering is like this.
@driver61 the orange bar at the bottom of your videos is the best thing on UA-cam. We the viewers really appreciate it! Thanks.
Hey guys, Established Titles is a SCAM, but don't hate on the youtuber, let him get paid, just don't buy anything from them.
Ackerman steering was a question thrown at me during an interview for a university place. No idea what it was at the time, especially since the place I was going for was computer studies. I failed. But my major car concern right then was all the water leaking out of the radiator on my journey over. My first car, a 1959 Ford 100E, reg no 2668 CR. Would love to have you back.
Almost the same concept of how you turn on the outside ski when carving. This is very important in GS racing.
I've been asking this for years..... thanks for explaining.
I was waiting for a clip of Alonso at Renault (2005-2006), back when he was actively inducing understeer in order to turn...
The white line simulation reminds me of Andy Green and Thrust SSC/Bloodhound LSR going over 600MPH. I wonder what they used on the Ackerman angles. I wish I had asked Richard Noble this when I met him!
The ThrustSSC was steered with two rear wheels behing each other in the middle of the car, so no Ackerman involved. Don't know about the Bloodhound though.
What about Casper Ackerman
All this my friends depends from slip angle of your tire
Scott, would you be able to do a feature on the 2026 F1 power unit rules? They seem to be pushing the cars into more lit-and-coast and burning fuel to generate electricity, possibly making the racing worse.
Ackerman angles!
i don't know much about it but I can thank assoluto racing for teaching me what it is
yes! didnt expect another assoluto player here...
So Ackerman just painteded a picture of the steering and they named it after him? I don't understand.
"Patent"
Established title scam.
I'm F1 fan for over 20 years now and never heard of this, thanks for the lesson!
I have made anti-ackerman geometry in my team FORMULA STUDENT car we will see how it will perform
It would be nice to have a follow up video explaining how the teams mechanically adjust it from track to track 🙌
Forward or backward placement of the steering rack is the best way to control Ackerman, but you can also adjust it a little with the position of the steering arms on the knuckle.
Great video! Established titles a scam though
Established Titels is a scam!!!!!!
been watching your channel for a while.. this is the best to show my students on how a car works,,,,a few will drop out of class.. they just want'a'be a racer bmw driver.. the ones that stay are the best students.. they dont race on the road,, and they always tell me about there driving exp.. how the car handled with this or that.. the ones that dropped out.. well thru the grapevine.. they get lots of tickets,, and a few have wrecked there( or daddys ) car,,,great channel,,keep it going
Ouch, you may want to get rid of the Established Titles ad since they’ve recently been exposed as scammers.
Adding a time bar to your ads? Simple but nice addition. Also I learned a lot in this video
For dirt racing, I adjusted the Ackerman to work in reverse, so the wheels pointed the right way when the car went sideways. Edit: I split the cross steering arm in the middle and had adjustment holes in a pivoting 'spade' arrangement.
Thanks to Established Titles for scamming this video!
I totally never knew this. Learned so much.
Fascinating. Great example of why this channel adds value to the ecosystem!
For road or other than F1 cars with FrWD or FWD front tires not only steer, but also drive, and use of front differentials enhances this even more, so different principles apply to steering
It is awesome to find who make this sport and it's technology understandable.
Magnificent work bro.
All the best 👍🏻.
Can you tell since when anti-Ackerman-steering is commonly used in F1?
Fantastic content Scott! 👌
Woah, this is really amazing, never thought of it in this way !!
"Painted" = Patent. That had me confused for a moment.
How is this even mechanically possible on a daily commuter vehicle... And is this possible with most Trucks, SUVs and Crossovers since they have stabilizer and anti roll bars?
The brits have some interesting ways of pronouncing words, but that was a new one for me
Ive always wondered why this was. Super helpful thank you!
Mikasa Ackermann also uses this in her combat
This is not only a great video for F1 but for automotive physics as a whole as well. The charts are also super helpful, thank you!
I absolutely love this channel, very well done!
There are SO many details in an F1 car and this is another one you explained beautifully. Keep up the great job!
I would like for you to analyze Fernando Alonso's driving style ( well, prior to 2022 ) with respect to slip angle, and how he had the team setup his car. As I recall, he used to put a LOT of steering input on corner entry, almost a "jab" or "excessive turn input" for a brief moment as if to put heat into the fronts.
More likely the sudden jab adds some weight transfer and gives the fronts a bit more grip to initiate the rotation of the car. It's safer to get the same effect with a jab of brakes, but then it takes away from the traction budget.
Another racing category that would benefit from anti-Ackerman is drifting. In drifting, you generally turn the wheel opposite in the direction the car is going, so you need the leading tire to turn less and the trailing tire to turn MORE to actually track the curve of the corner correctly and scrub the trailing tire less, therefore maintaining more front grip and control.
What a video. Congrats guys. More of this pls
I think this video really would have benefited from a simple top-down animation of the starring assembly geometry, with lines to indicate the forward direction of the tires. I think the concept is easier to grasp when you realize that even with a positive or negative Ackerman geometry the tires do remain straight when the steering is neutral, and the difference in the angles only occurs in the geometry when steering.
Is this why I run wide sometimes in F1 2022? Because I turn the wheel too quickly instead of working it over bit by bit? I'm gonna go try it!
Great job as always thanks :)
For some reason i enjoy listening to ur voice
I never knew this. Thanks
After 1 minute THIS earned you a SUB!
Tune to win by Caroll Smith has it all, and maybe the graph shown of slip angle vs lateral force isn't really of a slick tyre, it's more representative of a passenger car tyre.
Another legendary video 💯
Thanks for the breakdown 🙏
Wow can't believe they're talking about this now we understood this in the 80's when I was karting
Kali karts didn't use Ackerman
Fun fact - the Lotus Excel has neutral steering to improve higher-speed handling. Consequently the wheels judder badly in low-speed manoeuvres like parking, particularly in reverse. I experience this using an Excel as my everyday car.
Parallel steering: Wheels turn at the same degree
Ackerman (Lankensperger) steering: Inside tire turns more than the outside; to avoid scrubbing/wearing out the tire and turning better
ex: Road cars
Anti-Ackerman (Anti-Lankensperger) steering: Outside tire turns more than the inside; creates lots of scrubbing, but the outside tire can handle more slip angle and have more force to push the tire and have more grip.
ex: Formula One cars
I thought the reduced slip angle on the unweighted (or lesser weighted) is inside tyre was to increase its contribution to cornering force because it is in the performance window where the turning angle brings the tyre into a slip angle where it can contribute to lateral force, instead of just scrubbing off speed, though some scrubbing can help to rotate the car.
To help the inside tyre do this, suspension geometry can be set to reduce the camber on the inside tyre so the contact patch is bigger. The contact patch of the outside tyre is increased by the vertical load and tyre deformation so increased camber stops the inside of the tyre from lifting
Tires don't necessarily have a higher saturation peak with more load. Some race tires have a negative trend, with more Fz resulting in a lower saturation peak. Either way the deltas are not big on actual tires most of the time.
@@ArchOfficial what I'm referring to is the effect of REDUCING vertical load on the inside tyre. Without enough load for a given steering angle, the tyre will skid. Anti-ackerman reduces the steering angle to avoid this
@@Da5idc Yes, and some tires will need MORE steering angle with LESS load. I remember seeing two tires that do that.
My brain just got bigger. 😮
Great content and subject man, never knew this - Thanks 🙏
Was positive of this video until the established titles post… still waiting for the government to recognize my title…
Wow this is nerdy! I love it!
Hey @Driver61 could you maybe do a video on F1 running 4 cylinder engines. I know that might not be everyone's cup of tea and the chances of running v10's 12's or even 8's being so slim, if you look at how powerful bmw's 4 cylinder f1 engine was that brabham and Benetton used and how successful the Japan Super Formula series is with their 4 cylinders I'm sure F1 could make a success out of it. Sure the engines that is used in the Japan Super Formula series doesn't rev as high as F1 today but in my opinion they sound better. With the planned removal of the mgu-h and an inline 4 cylinder being slimmer than a V6 it could possibly mean slimmer and shorter as well as lighter cars. The Japan Super Formula cars weigh only 660kg with the driver included. Also manufacturers like Mercedes, Redbull with Honda and Renault for Alpine all have big experience and great success with 4 cylinders, I'm not sure of Ferrari but even the new comer Audi or at least VW has experience and success with 4 cylinders so that would mean no team would have a major advantage by being more experienced with those engines and it would be something fresh for F1. Also there were talks of increasing the power output of the mgu-k so with a 2l turbo 4 cylinder engine that makes about 600hp (not impossible the super gt cars make 600- 650hp and uses the same engine as the super formula) with the mgu-k you could be looking at 800 - 900hp in total.
Inline engines can't be stressed members of the chassis and so need reinforcement, pretty much the reason they've disappeared.
V4s are, unfortunately, an Elephant in the room, it's just cheaper and more straightforward to make Inline 4s for road cars where performance doesn't matter that much, because of that they have no road relevance for cars (not considering bikes, ofc).
@@afoxwithahat7846 I understand what you're saying but if Japan Super Formula can make a success out of them then F1 could too considering the money, resources and technology F1 engineers possess. Also look at the new c63 amg that uses a 4 cylinder and makes over 600hp to counter your argument of performance for those engines don't matter much on road cars. Lotus for another example uses 4 cylinder engines for how long now and are great cars to drive on the street and take to the track. The A45 amg is still the most powerful production hatchback on the road. Alot of private owned race car companies still use 4 cylinder engines for their track cars like the Honda K series or the Ford Duratec engine. Also look at Super GT and DTM before DTM switched over to Gt3 cars they had major success with 4 cylinders. Rally cars also still use 4 cylinder engines. Also if inline 4's are cheaper to produce that could invite more manufacturers to F1.
What about Mikasa Ackerman?
Charles: My steering wheel is broken
Ferrari: Okay we are checking
*Engineer pulls up this video*
Ferrari: Okay it only looks broken but it is totally normal
Charles: *crashes* Beautiful, Fucking Beautiful
i learned something new today. thanks driver61.
Question is how do they engineer the steering rack and uprights etc or whatever is involved to produce Ackerman or anti-ackerman steering
I'd imagine the process would be something like this:
Driver experience (Understand what the driver wants) - Analysis of current/previous designs (What works, what needs to be improved) - 3D models/FEA/Prototypes - Analysis of results - What went well, what needs to be improved, driver feedback - Necessary modifications/adaptions to steering system - Repeat until happy and ready to manufacture.
Most of the important information and hard work would be built on top of existing information/data and understanding what the driver of the F1 car needs, then its just a case of design and implementation, which for the Engineers in F1 is just another day at the office :)
We need Checo/Verstappen /Brazil/Monaco analysis! Thank you.
Very underrated transition to the ads.
Amazing! I had no idea how F1 cars steer... often vaguely wondering about that very question. Lankensperger steering. Thanks!
Hey! I think you have the best explanation of understeer (and potentially oversteer)/slip angle I've seen yet! A layman (regarding car/racing knowledge) can understand the concept of the wheel being pointed farther than the real steering direction with this explanation. Might you do a stand-alone video explaining this? It would be a useful resource for explaining the concept
As a skier who learned backcountry, I taught at Vail one year and they teach anti-Ackerman but it’s slower and I set the staff daily vertical feet record for the season one year skiing Ackerman wedge down backbowl pitches
Couldn't the video title be a bit more technical?
not only, Anti Ackermann gives more stability in fast corners
I feel like this is the kind of topic which requires a longer video and some in-situation examples. It's fascinating but a crash course is way too short for this 😥. Thanks though I learned something interesting today !
01:45 It looks like some dope machinery. Instead of Pirelli it had wood. And 1 wheel in front (for steering) and 1 in the back. It really needed to turn fast. Especially when carried in hand. Amazing! 👍
The steering wheel looks badass! Without LED.
“Slip angle where you get too much and the car understeers” - Hockenheim 2018 flash backs
Book recommendations for engineers :
Race car dynamics (Millikan&M)
Tune to win (Carroll smith)
Yup I always test the car Ackerman when I first drive it. Just to get the feeling. Personally I love some anti Ackerman, but that's just a personal preference
If I remember correctly, the old Porsche 911 uses Anti-Ackermann setup on the street cars.
Yes, to mitigate their horrendous oversteer.
Yes, up to the 964. It's very mild though.
5:14 that hás to be a Nickelback meme reference.
I would have gone with the meta: "Look at this timestamp: 5:14"