You Don't Know How Mirrors Work

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,7 тис.

  • @ScienceAsylum
    @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +662

    *Clarification:* In my quantum animations, that is not multiple photons taking different paths. It is a _single photon_ taking multiple paths simultaneously. We're releasing only one photon at a time. Adding those phasor arrows together gives us the _probability_ of receiving a single photon at any given moment.
    *Minor Correction:* I show the paths leaving the source at the same time and arriving at the detector at different times, when it should actually be the other way around. Paths that take more time should be leaving the source earlier in order to arrive at the detector at the same time as the others. The reason we can add the phasor arrows together is because the paths arrive at the detector at the same time.

    • @MrSenger00
      @MrSenger00 4 роки тому +20

      It's a cool video, but I'm surprised with people saying it's a "great explanation" and "coherent" since these phase vectors (as in other video as well) does not seems to cancel out at all, I mean I don't understand, how do they cancel? The Sum vector for them (from the beginning of the first arrow to the end of the last one) is pretty big and I'd assume that IF they cancel THEN it would be close to zero length, this is a huge inconsistency for me... @The Science Asylum please explain this
      Nevertheless the part with removing parts of the mirror was super interesting, can this be visualized with a real-world experiment? Is a demonstration even possible?

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +90

      @@MrSenger00 The only reason they're not perfectly canceling in the video is because there's only 13 arrows in the animation. In reality, there are an infinite number of arrows. There are many arrows for paths _between_ the ones I've shown and many more arrows for paths _off screen._ They would cancel better if I considered 100 paths or 1000 paths instead of 13.

    • @TheEmergingPattern
      @TheEmergingPattern 4 роки тому +5

      In reality it is the holographic principle taking the whole experiment setup into account. Also the color of the fotons and the gap distances on the mirror have an effect...

    • @fberron
      @fberron 4 роки тому +29

      Sorry, sorry; I didn't get the Minor Correction. How can the SAME photon leave the source at different times to arrive at the detector at the same time, if it´s the same photon?

    • @TheEmergingPattern
      @TheEmergingPattern 4 роки тому +4

      @@fberron haha, it's a cool video and some people really pay attention. :-)

  • @FriedrichHerschel
    @FriedrichHerschel 5 років тому +238

    What I liked is that the explanation went gradually deeper into it, "layer by layer", from the macroscopic law of reflection to a single photon ... with a few steps in between. It's propably the best way to educate a general audience.

  • @Zdman2001
    @Zdman2001 5 років тому +1031

    The best videos are when you take something you think you understand and apply Quantum Mechanics to it. It's a mind blower every time.

    • @shayanmoosavi9139
      @shayanmoosavi9139 5 років тому +64

      Quantum mechanics is like hot sauce on foods. It enhances the flavor, not many people like it and we can't handle too much of it. It's repulsive and attractive at the same time.

    • @cheydinal5401
      @cheydinal5401 5 років тому +5

      Pizza, but quantum mechanics

    • @musaire
      @musaire 5 років тому +4

      To be honest, I don't understand anything until quantum mechanics come in to play.

    • @cheydinal5401
      @cheydinal5401 5 років тому +8

      @@musaire Really until?

    • @danilov114
      @danilov114 5 років тому +1

      After that you can make a video of how last video does not understand QM...

  • @mrmkl9839
    @mrmkl9839 4 роки тому +81

    0:08 "They seem like they're pretty easy to understand... OR ARE THEY?!" 😂🤣 I sense Michael here

  • @tachzusamm
    @tachzusamm 3 роки тому +104

    Man, you can't guess how many explanations I've seen in my life why mirrors don't flip - but the example with text on a sheet of paper which you watch from the backside was THE eye-opener. Bravo.

    • @SimonBuchanNz
      @SimonBuchanNz 3 роки тому +5

      Of course they flip. They flip near to far. The fact that the text looks backwards is just a natural result of the inversion of the cross product of the.. oh no he's gone cross-eyed.

    • @MrJohnA125
      @MrJohnA125 3 роки тому +2

      You can do the same with a single cut out letter ~ use F and hold it in front of a mirror to prove it doesent reverse things

    • @Corn0nTheCobb
      @Corn0nTheCobb 2 роки тому +1

      @@MrJohnA125 shouldn't that be obvious? If you can do it with a word of text, of course it would also work with a single letter.

  • @louis-philip
    @louis-philip 5 років тому +475

    I thought I understood mirrors. I understand mirrors even less now. And that's a compliment.

    • @iforgoree
      @iforgoree 3 роки тому +14

      I never understood mirrors and i understand even less now 👁️👄👁️

    • @henrik.norberg
      @henrik.norberg 3 роки тому +5

      I thought I knew I understood mirrors, now I know I don't...

    • @Diamonddrake
      @Diamonddrake 3 роки тому +10

      As Feynman said, at some point you have to accept some things just are, and build your intuition and understanding on top of that.

    • @thespicehoarder
      @thespicehoarder 3 роки тому +3

      I totally Dunning-Kruger effected myself too with this one.

    • @andregustavo2086
      @andregustavo2086 3 роки тому

      @@iforgoree if you think you understand quantum mechanics, it means you actually don't, but if you think you don't understand QM, it means you do.

  • @vemo2474
    @vemo2474 5 років тому +685

    This channel is the most underrated in youtube. Such a great content with coherent explanation.

    • @IshaaqNewton
      @IshaaqNewton 5 років тому +4

      Absolutely

    • @anish_chapagai
      @anish_chapagai 5 років тому

      Agree

    • @marat61
      @marat61 5 років тому

      I like this Chanel too

    • @gearhead1302
      @gearhead1302 5 років тому +2

      Ya that was really good I'm glad I watched it. I had legitimately never heard that explanation before and had no idea it was based on probability.

    • @pizzapizzadesu
      @pizzapizzadesu 5 років тому +5

      He should become a meme to get known. Thats how it works on itnernet.

  • @snowthemegaabsol6819
    @snowthemegaabsol6819 5 років тому +597

    Everyone: Mirrors are simple. Light goes in one way, it comes out another way.
    Internet plebs: Mirrors are simple. When light hits the reflective coating on the surface, it bounces at an angle according to the law of reflection.
    Nerds: Mirrors are complicated. A usually silver or similarly reflective element that is electroplated onto the surface to serve as the mirror, will absorb incoming light, and vibrate. Those atoms will begin to emit their own light, in all directions, most of which destructively interferes except for in the directions that happen to match up with the predictions of the law of reflection.
    Nick: So imagine a micro black hole and a brick wall
    edit: guys I'm literally memeing, stop being annoying

    • @hubertheiser
      @hubertheiser 5 років тому +14

      Well, we don't need the black hole and the wall really, we just need to understand path integrals. The black hole and the wall are just a tools to do so without calling it "path integral". (I hope "path integral" is the correct translation of the German "Pfadintegral"? If not, please forgive me.)

    • @Lucky10279
      @Lucky10279 5 років тому +10

      @@hubertheiser I don't know German, but path integrals (more commonly called line Integrals, though this is a less accurate term) definitely seem like the right term for what Nick was describing.

    • @tomkerruish2982
      @tomkerruish2982 5 років тому +6

      @@hubertheiser "Path integral" is correct. The path integral formulation of quantum mechanics was the subject of Feynman's doctoral dissertation.

    • @lorekeeper685
      @lorekeeper685 5 років тому +1

      Welp

    • @tapferetomate914
      @tapferetomate914 5 років тому +7

      @@Lucky10279 For example, work would be a line integral of force. (in german: Linienintegral). A pathintegral is a integral of a functional with respect to a function. That's somewhat of a different thing. In the line integral we integrate over one fixed path (i.e. a vectorlike function) that basically serves as an Integration variable. A path integral on the otherhand sums the Integrand, a so called functional, a function of all possible paths, given as all possible vectorlike functions, by all these different paths, i.e. functions.
      One could say a path integral is the generalization of the line integral, but they are really just different concepts.

  • @benjaminsmith4058
    @benjaminsmith4058 4 роки тому +18

    Major kudos for not diluting the explanation and still giving a clear answer. I was expecting something to be over-simplified and was pleasantly surprised. Very well done!

  • @carpcarpbread
    @carpcarpbread 4 роки тому +69

    This video is a great example of quantum mechanics used in everyday lives: as for that last question, I’m in a superposition of yes and no.

  • @clieding
    @clieding 5 років тому +472

    “Mirror, mirror on the wall, was is the probability that I can see myself at all?

  • @swaree
    @swaree 5 років тому +165

    Therapist: Symmetrical Einstein isn't real, he can't hurt you
    Symmetrical Einstein: 1:00

  • @kripashankarshukla4073
    @kripashankarshukla4073 5 років тому +155

    Nick my favourite the one who teaches everything in the unique way that nobody does and nobody can teach like you phenomenal!!

    • @thingsiplay
      @thingsiplay 5 років тому +1

      Imagine he was your teacher in school.

    • @TechToppers
      @TechToppers 5 років тому

      I would dance

    • @nineball039
      @nineball039 5 років тому

      @@thingsiplay Then you would have to do the math.

  • @mrzabie0138
    @mrzabie0138 2 роки тому +19

    Nick, you are an incredible teacher. There aren't many people producing content quite like you can do.

  • @ChrisandBobsAdventureChannel
    @ChrisandBobsAdventureChannel 5 років тому +299

    Every video you produce feels like a single piece of an insanely large jigsaw puzzle. This video is definitely an edge piece!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 років тому +97

      An "insanely large jigsaw puzzle" is the single best description of physics that I've ever seen.

    • @FjorimDerHuene
      @FjorimDerHuene 4 роки тому +12

      @@ScienceAsylum once I was asked to ELI5 what debugging software was like. My response: Imagine a big jenga tower where you need to replace a block in its center. Now replace each layer of the jenga tower with a 1000 piece puzzle...

    • @sk-sm9sh
      @sk-sm9sh 3 роки тому +5

      @@FjorimDerHuene what sort of software field you're working in? I'm doing software development for a bit over 10 years and can't recall single instance where it would had been as bad as you describe.

    • @FjorimDerHuene
      @FjorimDerHuene 3 роки тому +6

      @@sk-sm9sh I may have exagerrated a bit to get my point across 😁 and it's only as bad as that if you're debugging legacy code that you didn't write yourself. Nowadays the experience is way better. Some occasions aside...

    • @n0nenone
      @n0nenone Рік тому +1

      @@ScienceAsylum I say "why is glass transparent" by Ted-ed And now even after your explanation, idk why mirror reflect 99% photons it receives even though it's 99% empty space and probability wise.. it should reflect like 1 or 2% of original intensity of light.... Can you explain?

  • @zas3362
    @zas3362 5 років тому +66

    came across your channel two days ago and only question is why on earth are people not watching you more and as for your videos they are really great

    • @sanketvaria9734
      @sanketvaria9734 5 років тому +1

      because most of the people are simpletons.

    • @zas3362
      @zas3362 5 років тому +1

      something we can be sure of even on applying quantum mechanics

    • @Soupy_loopy
      @Soupy_loopy 5 років тому

      Why did you wait until a few days ago to start watching?

    • @zas3362
      @zas3362 5 років тому

      @@Soupy_loopy well i needed to think about what he explained.

  • @thun7der
    @thun7der 5 років тому +972

    Me in high school: why doesn't this guy get millions of views?
    Me in college: why doesn't this guy get millions of views?
    Me in university: why doesn't this guy get millions of views?

    • @pizzapizzadesu
      @pizzapizzadesu 5 років тому +25

      hi brother

    • @thun7der
      @thun7der 5 років тому +18

      @@pizzapizzadesu oh hey joe

    • @aasyjepale5210
      @aasyjepale5210 5 років тому +38

      Me 6 feet under: why doesn't this guy get millions of views?

    • @dweazful
      @dweazful 5 років тому +60

      Me in High School: "I hate math. Physics has math. I probably hate physics too."
      Me in University: avoids any STEM-related subjects and studies [insert useless liberal arts subjects]
      Me now: watches physics videos on UA-cam and wonders why high school math & sciences teachers never teach like this

    • @joshanonline
      @joshanonline 5 років тому +15

      Don't expect anything good from UA-cam anymore. We'll be lucky if they don't ban Nick for not being good enough for advertisement. Their algorithm only favors the famous youtubers, little ones have been disappearing for a while and will vanish even more soon.

  • @karlvuleta
    @karlvuleta 5 років тому +100

    I definitely understand how mirrors work, thank you!
    10 minutes later: okay, maybe I didn't..

  • @danielkoprak4243
    @danielkoprak4243 5 років тому +83

    "shut up and calculate is a famous motto in quantom mechanic"
    thats exactly why i cose mechanical engineering.

    • @wesjohnson6833
      @wesjohnson6833 4 роки тому +7

      "Shut up and calculate" was actually written by N. David Mermin as what the Copenhagen interpretation meant to him. It was a complaint or a derisive remark. Much Like Fred Hoyle deriding the "Big Bang".
      In the same vein, Einstein said he would have named his theory the "Theory of invariance" had not Planck already dubbed it the theory of relativity.
      Memes are alive.

    • @moiquiregardevideo
      @moiquiregardevideo 4 роки тому +6

      Shut up and calculate to make sure that bridge won't collapse on the next windy day.

    • @arnaudj2708
      @arnaudj2708 4 роки тому +2

      well, shut up and calculate is a great way to describe how finite elements analysis work

  • @specialkender
    @specialkender 3 роки тому +86

    This video is brilliant. I have a degree in chemistry and just the other day I had the biggest impostor syndrome attack cause i realized i didn't know how mirror really works. I am now one step further from the perpetual abyss of ignorance.

    • @Legatron17
      @Legatron17 3 роки тому +2

      sus ඞ

    • @Bollibompa
      @Bollibompa 2 роки тому

      @@Legatron17
      Ugh...

    • @shashankhrishikesh1573
      @shashankhrishikesh1573 2 роки тому

      lol

    • @thetrickster9885
      @thetrickster9885 6 місяців тому

      As a high school student, i feel that every day haha. Whenever i go deep into anything i come to know that i dont know ANYTHING

  • @whoeveriam0iam14222
    @whoeveriam0iam14222 5 років тому +81

    people: magnets are complicated. how do they work
    Nick: have you ever really thought about mirrors?

    • @guywittig5069
      @guywittig5069 5 років тому

      Ha ! You have no idea how interesting magnetic fields are.
      “Relativistic effect of moving electric charges” Feynman.
      Definitely worth a video.

    • @altrag
      @altrag 5 років тому +1

      @@guywittig5069 ua-cam.com/video/XczMRsiq9mk/v-deo.html already exists (though I think it was part of a 3 or 4 video series IIRC, so you might have to look up related ones.) Should also look up minutephysics' take on the subject.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 років тому +1

      @@guywittig5069 How Special Relativity Fixed Electromagnetism: ua-cam.com/video/Ii7rgIQawko/v-deo.html
      Also, here's a whole playlist of E&M videos: ua-cam.com/play/PLOVL_fPox2K9MtRv68T_cmWwQUbg9YR4F.html

  • @jordanfry2899
    @jordanfry2899 5 років тому +63

    When you explained how mirrors don't actually flip images that kinda blew my mind.

    • @gawain78
      @gawain78 5 років тому +3

      That's quite funny because my reaction was: "OMG that is what I have always thought!"

    • @fredgotpub871
      @fredgotpub871 5 років тому +5

      It flipped my mind !

    • @MusicalRaichu
      @MusicalRaichu 5 років тому +16

      actually mirrors do flip things, just back-front, not left-right as most people think.

    • @Lucky10279
      @Lucky10279 5 років тому

      @@gawain78 Yeah, me too. I figured it out years ago, as a kid.

    • @q-tuber7034
      @q-tuber7034 5 років тому

      Thanks Nick for getting this right! Vsauce got it wrong.

  • @ulti-mantis
    @ulti-mantis 5 років тому +104

    "It's okay to be a little crazy"
    Quantum physics takes that phrase and runs with it at the speed of light through all possible paths simultaneously...

  • @hoffmann-photography-Syke
    @hoffmann-photography-Syke 4 роки тому +15

    Hey, that was the beginning of chapter 2 of Richard Feynman's book QED, but the animations are much more fun! Great work!

  • @craigsymalla25
    @craigsymalla25 5 років тому +4

    You crack me up whenever you get to quantum mechanics. That bit about taking out segments of the mirror yet the photon can still hit the black hole brings a whole new visualization of quantum mechanics. Absolutely amazing.

  • @stormlord1984
    @stormlord1984 5 років тому +9

    Among the top 5 science educators for me, both in terms of concise explanation, no unecessary pandering and keeping my interest throughout. Finding this channel in late 2018 was amazing.

  • @manuelb__r
    @manuelb__r 5 років тому +27

    Such an amazing way to explain hard things without letting details hidden. This is one of the best UA-cam science channels ever... Should have millions of subs!!

  • @ottovon5182
    @ottovon5182 5 років тому +140

    When he said that the girl in painting is looking at me, I got real scared

  • @lukeskywalker7457
    @lukeskywalker7457 4 роки тому +1

    Almost skipped the video because it was about mirrors ...
    Amazing! Thanks for introducing quantum into mirrors. I have a new perspective now.

  • @js7244
    @js7244 4 роки тому +6

    An introduction, in 10 minutes! to quantum electrodynamics! Beautiful job!

  • @calyodelphi124
    @calyodelphi124 5 років тому +7

    Not only do I feel like I understand mirrors better, the more you dive into the quantum physics of real-world phenomena, the more I start to understand quantum better, too! You are doing an incredible service to your audience, and you absolutely should not stop anytime soon. :D

  • @Siccmann
    @Siccmann 5 років тому +12

    Let's all promote this legendary channel. I've never seen such a great channel that explains science and all things and events so well like this channel does. Absolutely amazing!

  • @faikerdogan2802
    @faikerdogan2802 5 років тому +112

    loool i was like what could be interesting about a mirror, boy was i wrong

  • @darrellseike3185
    @darrellseike3185 2 роки тому +1

    Super video that not only helps explain mirrors, but also shows how counterintuitive QM really is!

  • @tahsintahsinuzzaman781
    @tahsintahsinuzzaman781 5 років тому +1

    I remember watching your videos a long time ago and then after a while, I forgot the name of your channel. I tried searching and searching for your channel/videos, but I couldn't seem to find it. Until FINALLY, today, UA-cam recommended me one of your videos (finally recommendations that are useful) and I realized that THIS WAS THE CHANNEL I WAS LOOKING FOR!

  • @GottfriedLeibnizYT
    @GottfriedLeibnizYT 5 років тому +19

    5:20
    "How cool is that!?!"
    VERY.
    I actually happen to be an engineer and studied detailed laws about reflection like for example how a reflection with an E-field being normal to the plane of incidence differs from another wave having a B-field normal to plane of incidence.
    But never the mechanism!
    I learned something new here. Thanks!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 років тому +6

      You're welcome! 🤓

    • @geraldfrost4710
      @geraldfrost4710 5 років тому +1

      A true scientist tests his hypothesis, and if if fails it's back to the drawing board. Get it wrong, and you've crossed a wrong idea off the list.

    • @mal2ksc
      @mal2ksc 5 років тому +1

      I saw the animations and thought "holy crap, it's acting as a phased array", and then realized "no, a phased array is trying to simulate that, stop being so anthropocentric".

  • @daniellassander
    @daniellassander 5 років тому +16

    This is really one of the best science channels on youtube :)

    • @daniellassander
      @daniellassander 5 років тому +1

      Thank you sir for the heart. I will eagerly look forward to the next video :)

  • @bdpc-dk2xb
    @bdpc-dk2xb 5 років тому +31

    So when I saw this title, I was a bit disappointed. I mean, mirrors sounded boring to me. But holy cow, this was fascinating. I should have never doubted the Science Asylum

  • @RV-fc9eo
    @RV-fc9eo 3 роки тому +7

    3:28 YES! YES! EXACTLY!
    Warning: Do not try this in your class. You will:
    a) Be told to focus on the syllabus
    b) Be yelled at and called oversmart
    c) Ultimately be confused till you Science Asylum and chill

    • @rogervanbommel1086
      @rogervanbommel1086 2 роки тому

      I did this(a few times), my teatcher always explained it

  • @joshuacoppersmith
    @joshuacoppersmith 5 років тому +3

    Really reminded me of the great New Zealand Feynman lectures. Thank you! I was about to request this video when I saw your video on the types of reflection. So many (even more-or-less reputable) science channels get "flipping" wrong, when it is fairly obvious (and things don't come obvious to me very often). The cutting out parts of the mirror thing toward the end is really fascinating.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +1

      Those Feynman lectures are linked in the description 😊

  • @hoggif
    @hoggif 5 років тому +10

    I glad mirrors don''t flip anything. That removes the question why they flip you horizontally, but not vertically.
    Thanks for another great video!

    • @Lhoizae
      @Lhoizae 5 років тому

      This explains it very well: ua-cam.com/video/vBpxhfBlVLU/v-deo.html

    • @amaljay8158
      @amaljay8158 4 роки тому

      Actually mirrors flip in the direction normal to its surface. If you're looking at a mirror, the image is looking at you.

  • @kombasanpracka
    @kombasanpracka 5 років тому +11

    WOW, that probabilistic part of the video where the non canceling waves reach the target even if they don´t obey the Huygens principle was a big surprise for me. Now I have a clue how to understand diffraction. Such a simple thing (at first sight) and yet so educative. Thanks a lot for this great vid.

    • @ronnyvbk
      @ronnyvbk 5 років тому +1

      Just wait now for the next leap ... nano structures exhibiting negative index of refraction (will include a to the timeline) and their practical applications like superzoom and invisibility cloacks ...

  • @chachnaq7337
    @chachnaq7337 5 років тому +115

    "Or does it?!"
    *Hey vsause, welcome to the science asylum*

    •  5 років тому +5

      Vsauce brought me here, in fact

    • @gale7682
      @gale7682 5 років тому +5

      vscience

    • @chachnaq7337
      @chachnaq7337 5 років тому +2

      @ me too

    • @Lucky10279
      @Lucky10279 5 років тому +2

      Oh, they should do a collab!

    • @EpitomeLocke
      @EpitomeLocke 5 років тому +1

      @ wait really? Vsauce recommended thescienceasylum?

  • @sarahloughhead7019
    @sarahloughhead7019 4 дні тому +1

    Awesome. I am a bio trained teacher and that is great to help me understand how photons travel. Thanks! I think the other aspect of light perception is that activation of physiological sensors require a threshold of energy, so we don't actually 'see' when the photon density is too low, so there must be a certain probability of photon density to trigger our receptors. Just looked up - Hecht, Shlaer, and Pirenne (1942) estimated that the absorption of 5-14 photons in a retinal area containing ~500 rods is sufficient to evoke a visual sensation. Which would be why we don't perceive photons outside of the higher probability pathways.

  • @graceful_grateful
    @graceful_grateful 3 роки тому +2

    The most loved thing about this channel is that it explains everything not just as law or mathematics, but from the very tiny particles...❤️

  • @aleiaaboutaleb8767
    @aleiaaboutaleb8767 5 років тому +11

    I love the way you explain. You make me understand all those difficult notions. Thank you

  • @DeclanMBrennan
    @DeclanMBrennan 5 років тому +5

    Fantastic graphic on vector addition and the extremes cancelling each other- talk about a picture being worth a thousand words !

  • @IshaaqNewton
    @IshaaqNewton 5 років тому +43

    Me: 7:17
    When someone asks me, "Does electrone move by orbiting? "

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 років тому +29

      It pretty much sums up anything in quantum mechanics.

    • @ekrem_dincel
      @ekrem_dincel 5 років тому +1

      @@ScienceAsylum Hi Nick! I was want to know why the reflection angles of light are equal , and that is the only thing i found about that topic. I want more videos on reflection and reftacting. Thank you for those videos!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 років тому +6

      @@ekrem_dincel I want to do one on refraction too.

    • @el7284
      @el7284 5 років тому +2

      @@ScienceAsylum oh dear God no.

    • @ekrem_dincel
      @ekrem_dincel 5 років тому

      @@ScienceAsylum Thanks you. You help us to understand physic well.

  • @CareyGButler
    @CareyGButler 5 років тому +1

    Great show! At first I needed to adjust to your way of explaining, but you seem to have the best intentions and are a great teacher.

  • @dman375
    @dman375 4 роки тому +2

    Dude... I don't know how your views aren't 10x higher... You have some of the best, most fun, and well-explained content of this type on youtube... period... hands down!

  • @chrissscottt
    @chrissscottt 5 років тому +19

    Whenever I feel that I have a reasonable grasp of reality I know I can come here and have those illusions shattered.

  • @quamch2774
    @quamch2774 5 років тому +12

    That was a simple, of considerable depth, explanation. Loved it!

  • @fdavillar
    @fdavillar 5 років тому +42

    I missed a warning signal saying "Do not Feed the Black Hole".

    •  5 років тому +2

      Haha I got that

  • @blainehoopes2153
    @blainehoopes2153 3 роки тому +3

    This is a terrific video. It's so difficult to come up with a way to show this stuff in easy to understand visual explanation but you've nailed it!

  • @professorlucasgroenner5117
    @professorlucasgroenner5117 2 роки тому +4

    I have been questioning myself how mirror actually works for about a decade. I had the feeling it wasn't that obvious all this time... but never went deep enough in the quantum mechanics to understand it. Thanks to you my mind blew... and it was amazing!

  • @OddSoxChris
    @OddSoxChris 5 років тому +32

    I will never look in a mirror the same way again...

    • @brendonwyer8863
      @brendonwyer8863 5 років тому

      Chris Z. Ha! I see what you did there...

    • @Soupy_loopy
      @Soupy_loopy 5 років тому +1

      I turn my back to the mirror, that way my face doesn't appear to be flipped.

  • @otakuribo
    @otakuribo 5 років тому +51

    "Why explain the math with symbols when you can explain it visually?"
    *Yes! Yes! Yes to the power of Graham's number!*

    • @PMA65537
      @PMA65537 5 років тому +9

      At work someone said Graham might be able to help so I said they could call Graham's number but it might take a while.

  • @NielsCG
    @NielsCG 5 років тому +4

    4:26 SUPERZOOM!!! Hey Nick, excellent video!! thanks for the mind-blow

  • @2puffs770
    @2puffs770 3 роки тому +1

    Can I just say that I LOVE the fact that you have a picture of a squirrel right there next to ya? My husband and I feed them on our patio (live cat tv), several have become so trusting they eat right from our hand. One even ran up onto my shoulder and leaned in to smell the walnut on my breath. I really do enjoy your enthusiasm, makes this so fun to watch. Hope they show these in our schools, but that would relate to education, so I doubt it. Their loss.

  • @MattGregoryGuitar
    @MattGregoryGuitar 3 роки тому +1

    3:14 - nice touch with the terminator eyes!

  • @matteodelgallo1983
    @matteodelgallo1983 5 років тому +23

    As a physicist, I wasn't expecting that much, I certainly wasn't expecting such a great video inspired by a chapter of Feynman's QED

    • @danresler6816
      @danresler6816 2 роки тому +1

      Not to mention explaining it faster and better than Feynman!

  • @arnabkarmakar0000
    @arnabkarmakar0000 5 років тому +4

    I wish I had a physics teacher like him in my school days ..
    Great explanation indeed.

  • @darkiusdark5452
    @darkiusdark5452 5 років тому +9

    I love how you simplified Richard Feynman’s interpretation of this trick called Reflection! Great work body! (Feynman version was simplified, yours is oversimplified).

    • @MitzvosGolem1
      @MitzvosGolem1 5 років тому +3

      Awesome Feynman lectures

    • @dcsignal5241
      @dcsignal5241 5 років тому +2

      I remember those lectures too, so much easier to follow with Computer graphics than a Black Board and Chalk.

    • @MitzvosGolem1
      @MitzvosGolem1 5 років тому

      @@dcsignal5241 yes I am 80s physics grad

    • @jaredhouston4223
      @jaredhouston4223 5 років тому +2

      I feel so privileged to live in a world with computer graphics, I have no idea how people managed to comprehend these ideas without these tools. Something about imagination and hard work. It really makes non-euclidean 6D differential vector calculus a lot easier to understand.

    • @pauncristi5557
      @pauncristi5557 5 років тому +1

      Yeah exactly what I wanted to comment, it's Feynman lecture with modern graphics!! The best of both worlds :)

  • @valsaat9032
    @valsaat9032 4 роки тому +1

    I know this is an older video of yours, but I just love it, it really made me cheer :)

  • @celivalg
    @celivalg 5 років тому +1

    Didn't know your channel, just stumbled upon this in my recommendations...
    first 3 min I was like: "okay this is boring, I know that already, if he doesn't bring something up, I'll skip"
    Then you bring quantum mechanics...
    Subscribed!

  • @chriswesley594
    @chriswesley594 4 роки тому +3

    This is another extremely good video - thank you. I've previously found what TV people would call your "treatment" annoying - seemingly aimed at children, but the sheer quality of the content trumps that. I visit Physics forums peopled by PhDs and I ask the kinds of questions your vidoeos answer, and your answers are clearer and seem more correct. This one gave me the glimmer of insight on an issue I've been asking for years, with no answes emerging - the fundamental reason for diffraction. WONDERFUL. It seems clear to me that your content is up with the very best in the world - Veritasium etc. I still think your treatment is holding you back, but I've come to look forward to "hey crazies" and I wish you all the best for an explosive (in a good way) career on YT.

  • @nitsanbh
    @nitsanbh 4 роки тому +16

    The
    “Yes! Kind of. Not really. Ah, maybe”
    Part was awesome

  • @MrStephenRGilman
    @MrStephenRGilman 4 роки тому +11

    When you stare into the abyss there's a non-zero probability that the abyss stares back at you.

  • @Demnia
    @Demnia 4 роки тому +1

    Wonderful video, I love the way Quantum mechanic can explain such things and the diffraction explanation killed me;)

  • @Rockancrime
    @Rockancrime 3 роки тому +1

    Huge props for talking about action! Nobody ever goes that deep into explanations like this, which is a real shame. Great video!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  3 роки тому +2

      I have a whole video on Lagrangian mechanics, if you're into that sort of thing: ua-cam.com/video/MIBfKJHMWHU/v-deo.html

    • @Rockancrime
      @Rockancrime 3 роки тому

      @@ScienceAsylum Maybe someday I'll return to the existential trauma that was my second year physics courses, but for now it's still too recent; too real :D

  • @paramountx
    @paramountx 5 років тому +10

    Lmao 7:17 - 7:24 cause when he asked the question I was basically saying the same thing you were. Lmaoooooooooooo

  • @LouisHansell
    @LouisHansell 5 років тому +17

    Nick: While I was watching this, my wave function collapsed.

  • @ArmiaKhairy
    @ArmiaKhairy 5 років тому +6

    "It's just probabilities" is my new favorite quote.

  • @parthprashar8498
    @parthprashar8498 3 роки тому +1

    Minutephysics also took up the concept of mirrors but your video is extremely funny.
    Keep up the good work.

  • @anthonyb5279
    @anthonyb5279 3 роки тому +1

    DUDE! YOU NAILED IT!!!!! but you should have brought up Bernoulli and Newtons proof of the brachistochrone using optics.

  • @playgroundchooser
    @playgroundchooser 5 років тому +4

    Me at 4:46 ... Hey, are those adding up in a line going the "wrong" way?
    10 seconds later... 😃😃 I'm learning!

  • @suyashverma15
    @suyashverma15 5 років тому +4

    You always manage to add something to my knowledge and imagination, and I am grateful to you for that.😊😊

  • @sampson4844
    @sampson4844 5 років тому +8

    I finally get the answer I want,bcs my high school teacher don't even know how to explain(or don't even know) why mirror reflect like that

    • @irrelevant_noob
      @irrelevant_noob 3 роки тому +1

      you mean "like that" as in left-to-right (apparently), or "like that" as in at the same angle? :-B

    • @sampson4844
      @sampson4844 3 роки тому +1

      @@irrelevant_noob
      "why same angle?"
      My teacher :"light behave like light"

  • @roseabdi9455
    @roseabdi9455 3 роки тому +1

    Ok.. at that painting part..I got goosebumps.. hope that won't hunt me at my sleep..

  • @ssssssssssss885
    @ssssssssssss885 2 роки тому +1

    Best youtube animation of the mirrors part of Feynman's famous QM lecture.

  • @bluesillybeard
    @bluesillybeard 4 роки тому +4

    me before watching: how do mirrors work?
    me after watching *HOW DO MIRRORS WORK??!?!?!!?!?!*

  • @kriss0214
    @kriss0214 5 років тому +4

    This channel is absolutely amazing, I feel crazy enough to be admitted to the Science Asylum after watching 😂🤪

  • @PreezyBaby420
    @PreezyBaby420 5 років тому +4

    8. Question everything (EXCEPT THESE RULES) lmaooo.
    Touche.

  • @hdpmrr
    @hdpmrr 3 роки тому +1

    What an excellent explanation of the quantum physics of light and mirrors.

  • @myaccountishacked6417
    @myaccountishacked6417 3 роки тому +1

    Im glad that PBS Space time sent me here; You deserve many more subs and views.

  • @tarun.starboy
    @tarun.starboy 5 років тому +5

    I've waited for so long for this video.

  • @bobcatgaze
    @bobcatgaze 3 роки тому +3

    I'm still trying to wrap my mind around the idea that beams of light are not actually beams of light, but just waves of energy interacting with each other.

  • @rnez99
    @rnez99 4 роки тому +4

    When he said "or does it?" the quantum probabilities of Vsauce being in the video intensified.

  • @arunkumarpv2003
    @arunkumarpv2003 2 роки тому +1

    Oh! I remember the "arrow" addition from Feynman's Lectures in Path Integrals :)

  • @goodaccount5120
    @goodaccount5120 3 роки тому

    This is really good! Especially Visualizing quantum Mechanic's equation, really helpfull^^

  • @the_hanged_clown
    @the_hanged_clown 5 років тому +8

    mirrors: where if I can't see you, you can't see me actually applies

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  5 років тому +1

      Indeed!

    • @Lucky10279
      @Lucky10279 5 років тому +1

      Unless you're a vampire! Lol

    • @yvrelna
      @yvrelna 5 років тому +2

      That's only true if you're just seeing eye to eye. In certain angles, as long as I avoid pointing to your eye, I can see your other body parts while you won't see any of my body parts.

    • @the_hanged_clown
      @the_hanged_clown 5 років тому

      @@yvrelna very true. also I wonder if our eyes were in a vertical line instead of horizontal, would the flipping effect follow suit?

  • @jerry3790
    @jerry3790 5 років тому +3

    Set phasers to stun!

  • @JavierArveloCruzSantana
    @JavierArveloCruzSantana 4 роки тому +3

    I'll reflect on this lesson, then I will probably come back to it.

  • @achinoammeyuchas8362
    @achinoammeyuchas8362 3 роки тому +2

    7:37 "Shut up & calculate!" summarizes my experience with quantum mechanics beautifully XD

  • @the_eternal_student
    @the_eternal_student 2 місяці тому +1

    That visual with the mirror in the painting was neat.

  • @dakotahballard6755
    @dakotahballard6755 5 років тому +6

    I watched this being like yeah I know how a mirror works challenge accepted. I did not.

  • @djd829
    @djd829 4 роки тому +3

    I just randomly ran into this, and it perfectly answered so many questions that I had while thinking on a boring treadmill run the other day, and then some. Great video.

  • @kbbeats3099
    @kbbeats3099 5 років тому +4

    Well I'm not first, but I'm not last. Hi Nick!

  • @kshitizpokhrel7482
    @kshitizpokhrel7482 3 роки тому +1

    I never understood how diffraction worked before, now I get it using quantum physics. Thanks a lot

  • @blender_wiki
    @blender_wiki 3 роки тому +1

    The most entertaining quantum mirror reflexion explaination i ever see. 💪👍👍