Why aren't Mirrors White? Why isn't EVERYTHING a Mirror?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 тра 2024
  • What's the difference between a mirror and a piece of paper? The answer requires an understanding of surface texture, but also light scattering, Huygens principle, and electrical conductivity. Optics is metal!
    ________________________________
    VIDEO ANNOTATIONS/CARDS
    The Color White Does NOT Exist:
    • The Color White Does N...
    You Don't Know How Mirrors Work:
    • You Don't Know How Mir...
    What the HECK is Energy?
    • What the HECK is Energy?
    Where Does Light Come From?
    • Where Does Light Come ...
    ________________________________
    RELATED UA-cam VIDEOS
    Vsauce on Mirrors:
    • What Color Is A Mirror?
    • INSIDE a Spherical Mirror
    ________________________________
    SUPPORT THE SCIENCE ASYLUM
    Patreon:
    / scienceasylum
    Advanced Theoretical Physics (Paperback):
    www.lulu.com/shop/nick-lucid/a...
    Advanced Theoretical Physics (eBook):
    gumroad.com/l/ubSc
    Merchandise:
    shop.spreadshirt.com/scienceas...
    ________________________________
    HUGE THANK YOU TO THESE PATRONS
    Warden of the Asylum:
    YDT
    Asylum Counselors:
    Matthew O'Connor
    Asylum Orderlies:
    Daniel Bahr, William Morton, LT MarshMan
    Einsteinium Crazies:
    Albert B. Cannon, Wacky, Ken Davis, Ilya Yashin, Eoin O'Sullivan
    Plutonium Crazies:
    JKLMN Anderson, Al Davis, Kevin MacLean
    Platinum Crazies:
    Mr. Orn Jonasar, Rick Dinning, Eugene Boone, Fletch, Felipe Cruz, Vittorio Monaco, Stephen Blinn, Mikayla Eckel Cifrese
    ________________________________
    OTHER SOURCES
    Etymology:
    www.etymonline.com/word/specular
    www.etymonline.com/word/refle...
    Constant Lists:
    www.engineeringtoolbox.com/re...
    hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/...
    hypertextbook.com/facts/2004/...
    www.engineeringtoolbox.com/pe...
    hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/...
    www.engineeringtoolbox.com/re...
    Miscellaneous:
    www.koppglass.com/blog/optical...
    Optics by Hecht
    Electromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems by Jordan and Balmain
    ________________________________
    LINKS TO COMMENTS
    Prompt Questions:
    • You Don't Know How Mir...
    • The Color White Does N...
    • The Color White Does N...
    • The Color White Does N...
    • The Color White Does N...
    Featured Comments:
    • You Don't Know How Mir...
    • You Don't Know How Mir...
    • You Don't Know How Mir...
    • You Don't Know How Mir...
    ________________________________
    IMAGE CREDITS
    Fluorescence:
    www.usgs.gov/media/images/dea...
    Phosphorescence:
    commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
    Silver:
    www.usgs.gov/media/images/sil...
    Mirror Spock:
    memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/...)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @WarrenGarabrandt
    @WarrenGarabrandt 4 роки тому +305

    In the past few months, this channel has blown away most of the things I thought I knew about how light works. And quantum mechanics. And relativity. Most valuable patreon investment I've ever made.

  • @dikshantraj6005
    @dikshantraj6005 4 роки тому +229

    your videos ask questions that i never knew i wanted, but soon as i see them i get sudden urge to watch the whole video!

    • @blueckaym
      @blueckaym 4 роки тому +6

      Yes, that's one of the unique Nick's specialties :)

    • @Fish-ub3wn
      @Fish-ub3wn 4 роки тому

      @@blueckaym Called dementation :D (not unique, rather rare)

    • @blueckaym
      @blueckaym 4 роки тому +1

      @@Fish-ub3wn , haha :) ok, I plead guilty of exaggerating a little bit ... but just a little ;)

    • @GAURAV_RANA_
      @GAURAV_RANA_ 4 роки тому

      Really? I asked my teachers these things so much they would get angry. This question i asked her and was not satisfied at all. This helped me but after 7 yrs🤣🤣🤣

    • @bk-sl8ee
      @bk-sl8ee 4 роки тому

      @@GAURAV_RANA_ that's very true, I can relate to that.

  • @TheAmbientMage
    @TheAmbientMage 4 роки тому +246

    "They're going to be the same, aren't they..."
    The resignation in that statement is palpable. I feel it so much.
    I love this channel.

    • @bk-sl8ee
      @bk-sl8ee 4 роки тому +4

      Could u explain what it meant I didn't get that sentence that much.

    • @Lucky10279
      @Lucky10279 4 роки тому +3

      It's cool how lots of stuff ends being the same thing if you look deep enough -- it means there're all things unexpected relationships just waiting to be found! That's a large part of what makes me love math and physics so much.

  • @disregardingsanity7005
    @disregardingsanity7005 4 роки тому +106

    Since the academic year’s done, I didn’t want my grandsons to stop learning. They complained about watching science videos, until they watched yours. They love your content and how it’s presented (seriously, who doesn’t love graphic representations, clones and squirrels?). For four, seven and nine year-olds to enjoy science is a feat unto itself.
    Your videos are entertaining and definitely informative. Please continue making videos! Thank you.

  • @buddy5335
    @buddy5335 4 роки тому +187

    I'm really glad that Nick does all of the Mathematical Doodleedoo's so we don't have to.

  • @QDWhite
    @QDWhite 4 роки тому +124

    These are the answers we deserve but not the ones we thought we needed right now.

  • @duggydo
    @duggydo 4 роки тому +33

    I’ve often speculated about reflection. This video diffused any incorrect assumptions I had.

    • @rc5989
      @rc5989 4 роки тому +1

      duggydo Ha! Good one!

    • @jumpieva
      @jumpieva 3 роки тому +1

      Thanks for shining light on this subject

    • @vomeronasal
      @vomeronasal 2 роки тому

      I saw what you did there. Nice 👌

  • @tom_something
    @tom_something 4 роки тому +61

    "The mirror-like reflection in this is from the surface atoms. The color is from the layers underneath."
    This exhibits an interesting difference between colored metal and polished materials. Plastic, ceramic, and all kinds of other materials will have a diffuse reflection that we identify as the "color" of the material. But the mirror-like reflection is usually neutral. Shine a blue laser on a yellow ceramic plate, and you'll get a good specular reflection of the blue light but poor diffuse reflection. Repeat the same experiment with polished gold, and both the specular and diffuse reflection will be poor. The divergence between specular and diffuse behavior drives our perception of "metallic" vs. "shiny". And the material doesn't have to have a mirror-like finish to exhibit this difference. Some "brushed" gold will still have a very color-biased specular reflection compared to "brushed" yellow plastic.
    This comes up in 3D modeling, where you can typically set a material's diffuse and specular "colors" separately. For non-metallic items, the specular color is usually set to a neutral shade of gray. For metallic items, the specular color is the same as the color we associate that material with. Though sometimes the color is modified slightly to mimic the way our eyes and real cameras would process it.
    Of course, when I'm modeling something, they're just values I set without wondering how they work in the real world. As always, this video was very.... illuminating.

    • @solapowsj25
      @solapowsj25 4 роки тому

      I'd understood that the metal with a single outer electron gives a specular reflection with formation of a virtual image. White porcelain with multiple electrons in it's crystalline surface reflects white with no virtual image, even though it's surface is more smooth. This video makes the point very clear. The blue laser seems too bright and too narrow a frequency range.

    • @tom_something
      @tom_something 4 роки тому +2

      @@solapowsj25 polished porcelain will reflect a virtual image, but only by a minority of the light. The rest of the light penetrates deeper, where it is absorbed (if dark porcelain) or diffuse-reflected (if brighter). You can see your reflection in a well-polished piece of dark stoneware.

    • @nimmen
      @nimmen 2 роки тому +2

      It's also why in PBR (physically based rendering), there are so many property maps for example for specularity and metalness. This video made me realise how that connected in the real world. I think the whole idea of PBR is amazing as it makes it possible to measure a surface property and then simulate it, creating a realistic result.

    • @tom_something
      @tom_something 2 роки тому +1

      @@nimmen Another cool rendering feature I only recently learned about is taking a 360 degree HDR image in a real environment, and then use that image to set all of the lighting for a scene. There's even a polished metal sphere that filmmakers use to grab a quick environment map that will be used to light a 3D model in its place. This way, the light map can be updated with dynamic scene elements, and the ball is sometimes moved around while shooting as well.

    • @josephcoon5809
      @josephcoon5809 2 роки тому +2

      @@solapowsj25 The thing about metals with a “single outer electron” is that it is a loosely bound electron that all atoms basically share. This is called the conduction band as it requires very little electrical potential to move electrons from one atom to the next. This creates more like a “sea” of free floating electrons. This “sea” has a very high degree of freedom in the plane parallel to the metal’s surface which means any light that is absorbed will move the sea parallel to the surface of the metal far easier than moving it toward or away from the atom. This is most likely why reflected light is polarized parallel to the surface of the material.
      I would also imagine that this high degree of freedom is also what allows the conduction band electrons to absorb most of the incident light as opposed to insulators absorbing a small portion.

  • @rizwan4858
    @rizwan4858 4 роки тому +66

    I always wondered about it but now came to know conductivity and reflection are so much connected, You Surprise me every time thank you for your efforts.

    • @TheReligiousAtheists
      @TheReligiousAtheists 4 роки тому +7

      I got a similar surprise while studying electromagnetism... the relative permeability and relative permittivity of a material have a direct relation with the refractive index of the material.

    • @solapowsj25
      @solapowsj25 4 роки тому

      Yes, conduction requires there be only one electron in the outer orbital. The stable state of two electrons alternates with one electron during electron-wave passage in current flow. These materials do not allow light to penetrate deep as crystals, plastics and ceramics do. They reflect at the surface with least distortion.

  • @MrPinknumber
    @MrPinknumber 4 роки тому +41

    Damn, your channel is Gold :D
    Thank you for these great explanations.

    • @markotrieste
      @markotrieste 4 роки тому +1

      I'd say silver, in this case. Higher plasma frequency :-)

    • @JustaReadingguy
      @JustaReadingguy 4 роки тому

      Need to reflect on that comment

  • @DarkMage2k
    @DarkMage2k 4 роки тому +421

    I never imagined I'd see a dirty joke in such a science oriented channel lol good one

    • @jangapardhu5300
      @jangapardhu5300 4 роки тому

      What

    • @GMPranav
      @GMPranav 4 роки тому

      ^

    • @imdawolfman2698
      @imdawolfman2698 4 роки тому +24

      heh heh he said penetration heh heh, SHUT UP BEAVUS!

    • @IshaaqNewton
      @IshaaqNewton 4 роки тому +1

      Whatever, I don’t think he said a joke.
      But I liked your joke so much. It was not dirty.😅

    • @DarkMage2k
      @DarkMage2k 4 роки тому +3

      @@imdawolfman2698 Nah

  • @bldavis36
    @bldavis36 4 роки тому +9

    Good video. 2 things though from someone "in the industry." 1), with the actual cost of material (incremental cost) because so little is used, Al and Ag are fairly irrelevant.The primary reason Al is often used instead is because of long term durability. Indeed the price to protect the Ag is more expensive (development and advertising and such) than the actual Ag! And 2, I think that green color at deep reflection may be coming from the typical soda lime glass used in second surface mirrors.

  • @huntermoss4587
    @huntermoss4587 4 роки тому +19

    I love that you are very connected with the audience!!

  • @jakemoran7118
    @jakemoran7118 4 роки тому +6

    Nick coming through with videos on optics as I’m studying for my waves and optics final is a true blessing

  • @paxdriver
    @paxdriver 4 роки тому +3

    Everyone dabbling in 3d modelling and texturing (ie blender) should watch your channel for stuff like this! Thanks much

  • @deadboy4735
    @deadboy4735 4 роки тому +8

    3:42 Light also goes through the front side and bounces off from the silver with the 2 layers of protective paint on the backside of the mirror.

  • @Danilego
    @Danilego 4 роки тому +6

    Wow, this was much more complex than I thought, but still you managed to explain it really well! I remember learning in school about mirrors being smooth while normal materials are rugged, but that wasn't the only part in the equation!

  • @volbla
    @volbla 4 роки тому +9

    This is, like, everything i ever wanted when it comes to light-matter interactions. Five thumbs up.

  • @Joyexer
    @Joyexer 4 роки тому +9

    That was exactly what i thougth would happen, but you took it to the next level with all the details.
    Thats what makes this channel so special

  • @admiralhyperspace0015
    @admiralhyperspace0015 4 роки тому +3

    The summary should have this point as well:
    4. It has to reflect back all visible frequencies of light almost equally to not be a distinct colour.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +2

      For the reflection to match the color of the object, yes, you are correct.... but I wouldn't have any problem calling a smooth polished plate of gold "a mirror."

  • @chuckbucketts
    @chuckbucketts 4 роки тому +3

    Nick, your videos often make me feel that there's even more stuff I don't know. They often answer questions I didn't even know I had. Nice work!

  • @kateiry4719
    @kateiry4719 4 роки тому +17

    Nobody:
    Nick: *P E N E T R A T I O N*

  • @radek9616
    @radek9616 4 роки тому +2

    First video of yours that I have seen. Instant subscribe. Great content and one of the only youtubers who does not beat around the bush!

  • @toanphucnguyentri2896
    @toanphucnguyentri2896 2 роки тому +6

    As a PhD student in quantum physics, I can only say that this is a seriously good video.

  • @stellarfirefly
    @stellarfirefly 4 роки тому +5

    Yay, I've been hoping for this episode for awhile now, especially after the previous one. And it was most excellently done, thank you!

  • @technicallittlemaster8793
    @technicallittlemaster8793 4 роки тому +8

    That was like my whole subtopic of mirror optics in 10 mins for my HS level.
    You even added some great explanation from graduation level as well
    Totally loved it.
    Thanks a lot it really helps my studies and feeds my curiosity.
    I just can't thank you enough.

  • @karthikprabhu3173
    @karthikprabhu3173 4 роки тому +2

    3:52
    Seriously I didn't see that coming

  • @adityachk2002
    @adityachk2002 4 роки тому +2

    Underrated channel.....don't be demotivated your golden day would surely come

  • @Chad_Thundercock
    @Chad_Thundercock 4 роки тому +5

    3:54
    Oh balls, you stole the 'giggity' right out from under me.
    Well done, sir. Well done indeed.

  • @kylebowles9820
    @kylebowles9820 4 роки тому +4

    In computer graphics we use probability distributions to model how light interacts with different surfaces. We call them BRDFs. My white material always looked a little too glossy, like satin or something... because it doesn't account for the depth and extinction parameters you were talking about! Thanks for the deeper understanding

  • @definesigint2823
    @definesigint2823 4 роки тому +1

    I had a vague understanding of this ahead of the video, now replaced with the "nice, thank you very much" I so often have after watching. The way you make this approachable casts some light on other things (like the ocean's total internal reflection angle) and fosters further study -- and that's pretty awesome. I hope your subscriber count keeps going in the right direction :)

  • @Lucky10279
    @Lucky10279 4 роки тому +1

    I love how you sum everything up at the end of each video. It's really helpful. ;)

  • @CMDR_Analdo_Blackvoid
    @CMDR_Analdo_Blackvoid 4 роки тому +3

    I really love this channel. I know of no other place where I can have so much fun and still learn a lot :)

  • @GameRocker
    @GameRocker 4 роки тому +3

    Probably the best channel on physics on youtube. I don't know why I found this only a few days earlier.

  • @CJ-111
    @CJ-111 4 роки тому +1

    This is easily one of my favorite uploaders on UA-cam. You have a way of explaining these topics so clearly

  • @SinanAkkoyun
    @SinanAkkoyun 2 роки тому +1

    I love this explanation!
    I would have liked to see you explaining the result of electric conductivity in regards to the fresnel effect in metals an dielectrics, but this would have been too much.
    Love it! Even though this is two years old, I wanted to praise you for your videos!

  • @unvergebeneid
    @unvergebeneid 4 роки тому +5

    Me before the video: "Ugh, this is gonna be really basic. I already know this one."
    Me a few minutes into the video: "nvm"

  • @jlpsinde
    @jlpsinde 4 роки тому +4

    Hi, you are very kind to us all e you are the best teacher I know, I am a physics teacher and I didn't learn this things at the university.
    Amazing work. Perfect.
    It's a pleasure to help you on Patreon.
    Feel comfortable to take a rest when you need.
    We're here for you!

  • @jaunesmith0947
    @jaunesmith0947 4 роки тому +2

    2:15 I always get pumped when this music starts playing!

  • @TheBaltherion
    @TheBaltherion 2 роки тому +1

    This guy makes video about questions I never knew I wanted the answer to.

  • @kuldeep9605
    @kuldeep9605 4 роки тому +24

    I love physics i am in 10th grade i will surly will become a theoretical physicist i am glade i understood nearly 75% of the video so love you sir😊😊

    • @Joyexer
      @Joyexer 4 роки тому

      Dont make your mind up too soon. Give all of physics a try and see where it goes. Thoretical stuff is really dry, though sometimes really exciting and mind blowing. Nowadays theoretical physics is really advanced and the experimentalists cant really keep up with all the stuff proposed. So the theorists dont get enougth imput back, as it seems to me at least. Anyways... Keep your mind open and question everything. :) I ll study physics soon as well and will by great chance be an experimentalist. Have a nice day!

    • @beachcomber2008
      @beachcomber2008 4 роки тому +4

      And don't be surly. :)

    • @FriedrichHerschel
      @FriedrichHerschel 4 роки тому +3

      I hope you love math as well then.

    • @FreeStuffPlease
      @FreeStuffPlease 4 роки тому +1

      Goodluck with ENC 1101 😄

  • @PaulPaulPaulson
    @PaulPaulPaulson 4 роки тому +13

    My question is in the video! I'm a question clone now! 😁

  • @jimmomusic
    @jimmomusic 4 роки тому +2

    Love your channel! About 15 seconds in, I was thinking "Feynman diagrams would be a cool way to give an intuitive explanation". Get your bongos out! :) haha! Also, your point about green light aligned with something I was telling my eldest about why chloroplasts reflect green light (why are plants green?) because it is the most inefficient wavelength for absorbing energy for photosynthesis...it's no coincidence that plants and recursive mirrors reflect green!

  • @RavenLuni
    @RavenLuni 4 роки тому +1

    A subject I know and love (spent alot of years coding ray tracers) and you still covered more than I ever thought of. You rock :)

  • @saatviksinha4881
    @saatviksinha4881 4 роки тому +13

    You answer common curiosity. Bless you!

  • @BCdesu
    @BCdesu 4 роки тому +23

    1 question here:
    "Mirror mirror on the wall, who's the best physics UA-camr of them all?"
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    -It's Nick, it must be Nick!

  • @Mr-Garibaldi
    @Mr-Garibaldi 4 роки тому +1

    Always enjoy when the music changes into "We're getting Serious" mode 😂... this time at 2:15

  • @tomaszbekas
    @tomaszbekas 4 роки тому +1

    Your videos are amazing! Keep up the good work!

  • @MrGeoffHilton
    @MrGeoffHilton 4 роки тому +8

    You're so brainy, but at the same time totally looney, I love ya!

  • @mohammedal-haddad2652
    @mohammedal-haddad2652 4 роки тому +9

    I'll never look in the mirror the same way I used to again.

  • @wolfisr
    @wolfisr 4 роки тому +1

    Really good explanations about though physics☺ keep up the good work!

  • @rc5989
    @rc5989 4 роки тому +1

    Hey Science Asylum, another great video as always!
    As you know, we use the index of refraction in fiber optics, basically the backbone of all telecommunications.
    However, in my industry the “last mile” is usually coaxial cable, RF over coax. For the longest time, since the 1960’s, the manufacturer of the coax has specified the Velocity of Propagation of the cable, which is the percentage of the speed of light that the signal can travel through the cable. Well, nowadays this is actually very important for everything to work correctly (TDMA for example).
    So here is my question:
    The VoP is just a number from the manufacturer via quality control testing. Our servers work with each individual customer modem to negotiate the proper timing required to use ATDMA for that specific distance of coax, never actually solving for the VoP. We can use the VoP to detect echos of signal and get a pretty good idea of where a flaw or crack in the cable is located (within 40 feet) and repair these before corrosion sets in and the signal gets seriously impaired.
    Yet, as I understand it, there is no physics method to precisely derive the actual Velocity of Propagation of a RF signal through a medium.
    Are you willing to do a video on Velocity of Propagation of RF through a dielectric? Pleeeeeeeeeeeease.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +3

      There are a lot of things in physics/engineering that are much easier to experimentally measure than theoretically predict. The refractive index (mentioned in this video) is a good example. While we _could_ derive it theoretically if we could get a computer to model the behavior of light properly in the material, I don't think anyone ever _has_ done it. It's just not worth the trouble.

  • @gavin_oppegard
    @gavin_oppegard 4 роки тому +4

    This actually makes 3D modeling more understandable.

  • @valdemarbndinghansen3109
    @valdemarbndinghansen3109 4 роки тому +3

    I’m gonna have to be that guy and ask: “WHY does higher conductivity mean a lower penetration deapth”
    And great video as always, made me ask myself a ton of questions, which is always a good thing🙂

    • @alexanderofrhodes9622
      @alexanderofrhodes9622 4 роки тому +4

      Higher conductivity generally means more free flow of electrons in the material, which interferes with the lights ability to penetrate
      -A guess

  • @NathanPK
    @NathanPK 4 роки тому +1

    Dude, you get better with every video. Great channel!

  • @chalecoflash
    @chalecoflash 4 роки тому +1

    I still haven't recovered from your previous video about how mirrors work, but thank you for this second jab to the brain :D

  • @0x0404
    @0x0404 4 роки тому +3

    Polishing to a mirror shine is a term for a reason!

  • @joelcraig9803
    @joelcraig9803 4 роки тому +3

    3:51 "Its something we call Penetration Depth" Was that innuendo clone?

  • @kex0
    @kex0 2 роки тому

    I was looking for a comprehensive explanation of why light is "bending" when crossing between 2 different mediums for years. This helped me a lot. Thank you.

  • @anushkapoor676
    @anushkapoor676 2 роки тому

    One of the best videos on the topic, answered so many questions I had in past...

  • @adam3896
    @adam3896 Рік тому +3

    How do you always manage to get things right. Seriously, a lot of professors are stumped by a fair amount of questions you answer.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  Рік тому +2

      I do a lot of research and keep learning. Unfortunately, many professors stop learning after they get their degrees. (As someone with a chronic illness, I can tell you this is true of many doctors too.)

  • @jacobostholm9030
    @jacobostholm9030 4 роки тому +7

    its like The Science Asylum reads my mind. Thank you Nick

  • @BrianFedirko
    @BrianFedirko 6 місяців тому +2

    that is amazing, and we walk around not knowing any of this... even though it''s comprehesive. love it! ☮

  • @cheeseweasel69
    @cheeseweasel69 4 роки тому +2

    Another good one Nick! Keep em coming.

  • @joeycook6526
    @joeycook6526 4 роки тому +4

    I caught myself trying to like this video like 5 times after I'd already pressed "like."

  • @HelmutPolischer
    @HelmutPolischer 4 роки тому +5

    He's got me saying "super zoom" before he says it :)

  • @nradamson
    @nradamson 3 роки тому +2

    "So why aren't all insulators transparent?" By the end, it made sense why a good mirror needs to have a specular surface (that's the one most people discuss), why it needs to be a decent conductor (shallow penetration depth that results in greater reflected light than transmitted light), and not have electron energy levels that match the frequency of incoming light (resonate absorption traps light as heat, whereas dissipative absorption allows it to be released as EM wave patterns that can build up at the angle of reflection)....but I feel like that one question thrown in there wasn't answered. Am I missing something? What causes insulators to be opaque? is that simply a result of the random way the atoms are organized inside that produces constant absorption and emission internally? Does this mean opaque insulators capture more heat as a result if the continued oscillations of these atoms and increased kinetic energy from those oscillations? If not, why doesn't this transmitted light come out the other side of opaque insulators? (Sorry I know this is a long comment but I love your channel and your videos are so enlightening - just trying to wrap my mind around that piece)

  • @danielwalker5682
    @danielwalker5682 4 роки тому +1

    Another brilliant set of explanations. Thanks!

  • @rhythmmandal3377
    @rhythmmandal3377 4 роки тому +4

    Your vids make me think "should have taken physics in university"

  • @davidecarusone3333
    @davidecarusone3333 4 роки тому +3

    Me before watching the video: I know why white materials aren't mirrors, it's because of the imperfections on the surface!
    Also me 1 second later: .....that's not the whole story, is it?

  • @thegenxgamerguy6562
    @thegenxgamerguy6562 4 роки тому +1

    Honestly, I wondered about that, too. Especially after your last mirror video.
    Thank you for the great explanation!

  • @geoffstrickler
    @geoffstrickler 2 роки тому +1

    Good explanation. Best I’ve seen or read on the topic.

  • @Nulley0
    @Nulley0 4 роки тому +3

    Meerer is what we like...

  • @starkillerz6235
    @starkillerz6235 4 роки тому +3

    I have a question.
    Does dissipative absorption result in the frequency of light (colour to us) of an object given off or the reflected light of a mirror?
    p.s this channel has really inspired me a lot so thank you.

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому +4

      Yes, dissipative absorption is the kind that result in the color we see on objects. The colors (frequencies) near the resonance stay absorbed and the rest are re-transmitted dissipatively.

  • @brianbushue2997
    @brianbushue2997 2 роки тому +1

    dude i am so glad if found your channel. so informative, and fun. this was a great video

  • @gabrielkouvalis8621
    @gabrielkouvalis8621 4 роки тому

    I've always wondered why mixed colours reflect a colour that was previously absorbed. This video somewhat lays some ground on why this might occur but I'm still left with questions. Love the vids!

  • @iamjimgroth
    @iamjimgroth 4 роки тому +1

    I love your videos. Even when something seems super simple I end up learning something. :)

  • @dtrimm1
    @dtrimm1 4 роки тому +1

    Terrific video Nick - really enjoyed it.

  • @GabrielVitor-kq6uj
    @GabrielVitor-kq6uj Рік тому +1

    This awesome, the conductivity on the matter reflections is also cool.
    I know USA paints their 5th gen fighter jets with a nanotubic structured material that traps light and it's also dielectric, thus absorbing radio waves. And the russians with their version of a 5th gen fighter jet, replaced the metal fuselage altogether with a type of polymer-ceramic composite materials which are dielectric by nature, so they kinda absorb most of the radar waves and reflects only a bit. Your video here helped me visualize that a lot better!!!

  • @willie92708
    @willie92708 2 роки тому +1

    The surface of paper is not only rough, it's more like a fuzzy blanket or an air filter. The filaments of paper go every which direction, but are smashed down so overall it's a "flat" sheet.

  • @freespeechisdead1565
    @freespeechisdead1565 2 роки тому +1

    0:08 I love how one of the questions is, "If white color reflects all the light, what a mirror does?"

  • @sander_bouwhuis
    @sander_bouwhuis 2 роки тому +1

    Oooooooooooooh, wow! Thank you! The refractive index of light going through different mediums has baffled me for decades! Up to now I only knew about the 'light takes all paths but most strongly at the refractive index' explanation.

  • @Lucky10279
    @Lucky10279 Рік тому +1

    6:48 I should have realized this last week -- I spent several days last week going back and forth with my QM professor trying to understand how heat absorption at the level of QM before I finally understood I was at the wrong level of abstraction.

  • @onradioactivewaves
    @onradioactivewaves 4 роки тому +1

    Great job on your videos!

  • @diogosousa1001
    @diogosousa1001 2 роки тому +1

    See if I understand correctly: a red object, for example, is red, because its electrons absorbed the other colors by resonant absorption, while the electrons (or the atom as a whole) absorbed the red light by dissipative absorption. Thanks, your videos are great!

  • @ChrisWalshZX
    @ChrisWalshZX 4 роки тому +1

    Another EXCELLENT video from Nick. Thanks! 😁

  • @earychow839
    @earychow839 4 роки тому +1

    I am learning 3D CG and your video make me understand more about those BSDF PBR shaders I have been using. Thank you!

    • @ScienceAsylum
      @ScienceAsylum  4 роки тому

      You're welcome! 😊 I have lots of people in the comments saying this and I'm always happy to hear when my videos help.

  • @udokahn3262
    @udokahn3262 4 роки тому +2

    Once again you out did yourself, amazing video keep it up i love it, and you

  • @chiefdvm1671
    @chiefdvm1671 4 роки тому +2

    Whoa.... I didn't think being a mirror would have so many properties of its own. This video was phenomenal!!! Understood each and everything clearly...! Thank you Nick!

  • @Lucky10279
    @Lucky10279 4 роки тому +2

    Nick: You don't need quantum mechanics for this.
    Also Nick: shows light as a wave and talks about quantum energy levels.
    ;)

  • @SianaGearz
    @SianaGearz 2 роки тому +1

    I believe cellulose polymer in paper is actually spectacularly transparent, not quite as transparent as glass but in the grand scheme of things not too far off either. The diffuse reflection occurs purely due to the shape that the nature delivers it in, hollow squiggly ragged tubes with a lot of semi-regular partitions, so a lot of boundaries at which the light can exit or get reflected.
    People have used this property to make "transparent wood" and wet t-shirt contests.

  • @grolmidri7759
    @grolmidri7759 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you for making these videos. You are one of life’s positive influences, a doer and thinker, which for what it’s worth IMHO makes you a modern day hero sort of. Meant as a compliment rather than weird awkward statement

  • @benjaminsharef6589
    @benjaminsharef6589 4 роки тому +1

    Great video--expand a lot about mirrors that I didn't understand.

  • @fdavillar
    @fdavillar 4 роки тому +1

    That is fantastic, one more reason to join electrical and magnetic fields! GREAT episode.
    I have a question: Keeping in mind the electrical conductivity, would distilled water have different reflection/refraction properties than salt solution?

  • @ibanix2
    @ibanix2 4 роки тому +1

    This dovetailed nicely with my Optics class this semester....

  • @user-sb3wh3dd4v
    @user-sb3wh3dd4v 4 роки тому +1

    One of your best episodes yet!

  • @ashsamuel5324
    @ashsamuel5324 3 роки тому +1

    How are you this good with your video production & story telling? and your a scientist! Thank you for doing this sir!

  • @lindsayheyes925
    @lindsayheyes925 2 роки тому +2

    You should cover fluorescence and photon tunneling in some butterflies' wings... they amplify colours by converting wavelegths to the visible part of tge spectrum, and redirecting photons which would otherwise be absorbed by ir lass through the wing.

  • @localverse
    @localverse 4 роки тому

    Your explanations open new doors of understanding into science and new ideas to explore. Got an idea from your last video on mirrors that revealed how mirrors reflect at 90° and from the video "Where does light come from?" that revealed how a line of charge moving one way made the field respond at 90° or perpendicularly except the slight delay for the field response to align with the moving charge created a wave that we perceive as light and so those two revelations in your videos got new thinking: What if the 90° of reflection by the mirror is related to how light and the magnetic field each form at 90° to a moving charge?

  • @intotheunknown8100
    @intotheunknown8100 4 роки тому +1

    That's great informative video.. Thanks