J-31 The Forgotten 5th Gen Fighter
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
- A look at the Shenyang J-31.
Please consider supporting this channel by becoming a member: raafdocumentar...
We are also on Substack militaryaviati...
If you are looking for an aviation themed gift and want to support this channel, check out the Military Shop by using our affiliate link militaryshop.c... and you can also use our coupon code AMAHA for a discount!
We are also affiliates with Airfix Models - please use our link prf.hn/l/meNMQn5
____________ Disclaimer ____________
Original footage and recreated scenes may not be 100% accurate to the event being described but has been used for dramatic effect. This is because there may not have been original footage of a particular event available, or copyright prevents us from showing it. Our aim is to be as historically true as we can be given the materials available.
Copyright disclaimer under fair dealing sections ss 40/103C, ss 41/103A,ss 42/103B of the Copyright Act which includes research, study, criticism, review, and reporting of news. Copyright remains with the respective owners. These videos are made for educational purposes only.
The Australian Military Aviation History Association is a not-for-profit association with the intent of recording, preserving and promoting Australian military aviation history.
Indian’s amca is only on the drawing board, as just like all of their military “made in India” dream, takes 20-30 years to materialise, and even then more than 70% are all imported parts(tejas, Vikrant etcs)
Turkish’s Khaan relies on the west for its engine, so not truly an independent manufacturer.
Korean’s KF-21 is not even a fifth GEN fighter to begin with, and again most of the parts relies on the US.
in light of the above, the only truly one left is the China’s FC-31/35, they basically made everything themselves including the engine.
SK government has a plan to make it become 5 generation Turkiye still in the process but they're still on track but yeah amca still is the only ones that still in drawing board
Even South Korea, Japan, France, German and UK makes better Equipment than India. China, Russia and USA is too much to compare to India.
Türkiye is also manufacturing its own engine and it will be ready in 2028
@@jasonke5061 very true bro
India 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Indian’s AMCA still exists only on PPT
😅😅😅😅😅
That's Y IN bought 36 Rafaels. Even nearly delinquent PAK could afford 40 of J31! Had IN not bought, both would have saved $Bs for their infrastructure. Rafaels now dead ducks?
India is improving but it genuinely has a long way to go before it can be considered as a true power.
ur wrong, not even on PPT, its just in mind on few people😄
we develope our own planes. China copies them.
Stolen tech? Because it has wings and engines?
Chinas history of espionage is well documented, including into the F-35 program. stop gaslighting people.
And can fly
Weakness and ignorance are not obstacles to survival, arrogance is。Let me make a bold prediction: the West will lose more because of its arrogance.
🤦 No, Because it was stolen information of the F22 and F35 is it that hard to understand and even if China Has Copies of F22 and F35 they are never as good as the original and the fact that Indian Su-30 was able to lock Chinese J20 thats already enough proof.
In August 2014, a Los Angeles grand jury indicted a Chinese national named Su Bin (a.k.a. Stephen Su) for his involvement in a cyber-espionage scheme perpetrated by People’s Liberation Army hackers.
Finally, a channel not straight up saying the American ones are superior and Chinese ones are shit but with some proper analysis
@@gp2jm Yeah bro,totally agree with you. I don't understand how some people are refusing to give some credit to the country, who was able to switch from a cheap plastic stuff ,to high advanced technologie producer. I'm not Chinese but we should stay realistic.We can't deny Chinese unbelievable achievements in such a short period of time.
@@dragicadjuric3635 yep I have seen a lot jealousy in other channels. China is competing with itself to improve further.
What, you think if this channel did a performance comparison between J-20 & F-22 would show 🇨🇳's jet isn't shit? J-20 is one of the great aircraft of this time. That's an easily justifiable statement, IMO. Leave it at that. It doesn't need to be any more & people who value their integrity won't lie to you to gain your approval.
@@corvanphoenix The only meaningful performance comparison is an actual combat. What I'm saying is that these channels that appear to be 'experts' guide their viewers and create bias.
People don't understand that Chinese are content to be behind in development in eyes of opposition, as long as it's good for business! But,Blinkin going there to beg them not to produce so much,😅 is telling!
5th gen fighters are like modern cars. They all look alike.
You can also say the same thing about WW2 props - the Bf 109, Spitfire, Yak-3 and even P-47 all look very similar
It's called geometric stealth.
@@kieranh2005 It's called dumb comments from people who don't know what they're talking about.
@@billrich9722 wait he said it right.. stealth comes from 2 aspects: geometric stealth and RAM paint.. so the shape is part of the geometric stealth.. why is he dumb mentioning this noob 🤷♂️
Cars still look different. Smartphones would have been the right word.
Its physics. When you match the performance requirements with modern materials you end up with similar solutions.
thats not true at all...
@@nikoc8968 its true. physics works the same way everywhere
@@nikoc8968 tell me what's 2+2 and 1+3
That, or you downloaded the plans from your competitor.
@@royk7712 thats pseudo-intellectual nonsense. if that were true, then all planes would have always looked the same; and all things ever made in the same category, for the same purpose, would have always looked the same.
the F-22 doesnt even look like the F-35 for christs sake, and those are 2 5th gen fighter aircraft from the SAME COMPANY.
As an indian I can tell
There is no HAL AMCA
Untill 2050 mate
Cuz there is no engine
I don't know if China stole anything, but I know that Americans stole Indian land.
nailed it，bro
Yes, they are even proud of it🤔
No Chinese incursion into Ladakh,
Pm Chaiwala...😅
"They made us many promises, more than I can remember,
but they never kept but one;
they promised to take our land, and they took it."
- Chief Red Cloud
Chinese never boast in any form but western critics always stated Chinese copy everything or reverse engineered. The truth of the matter is just look at the number of STEM grads and used common sense. Wind Tunnels and material sciences, physics and math research people do amazing things or do Chinese copy that too.
It is rumored that that j31 is foing to be a export variant and some countries are looking into it like Pakistan which already has considerable airplanes from china
No one is buying this shit heap
Thats what they want it to be... but it's not a good plane so I dont see how they would be able to sell it to anyone.
@@korana6308
And you base that ass-essment on what exactly?
Other rumours say, it is a carrier-based fighter, that oughtta replace J-11 and j-16.
@@korana6308
"but it's not a good plane"
Based on what exactly?
A good video, let me provided some supplement.
1:44 and 2:46
Shenyang's 5th gen figher concept, now is known as the J-19 "Snowy Owl", ironically, was failed because it strictly followed the PLAAF's requirements (which is they're good at). Somehow the PLAAF initially request that their 5gen fighter will have range no shorted than Su-27, stealth capability, and strangely, high AoA performance that could keep at least *70 degrees of steady high AoA flight and maneuver.*
This is what you can see on the J-19 - 3-surface configuration, with crank delta wing and LEX, to provided the required high AoA capability, and a scale that even larger than the current J-20 (some source claimed over 22 meters, almost equivalent to Mig-31, and its internal weapon bay is large enough to carrying anti-ship missiles.
The price, however, is the stealth capability. The J-19's radar profile, from one source that being used as the textbook (could have some declassification) of aircraft stealth designs (I personally read this book before since I study aviation engineering myself), is just equal or slightly better than the Su-57, which is actually also the initial requirements - specifically, the requirement of stealth performance is an average RCS of 0.3m2 in forward hemisphere. This is just slightly better than Su-57's 0.4m2. (This is average value, and cannot be directly compared to F-22's 0.001m2, which is the minimal peak value in front angle.)
And once again, like the things happened in the biding of J-10 and J-13 (in case you don't know that's Shenyang's 4rd gen fighter concept, basically a merge of Mirage F1 and F-16), Chengdu teached the PLAAF that they were knowing how the 5th gen fighter will fight better than air force themselves. They managed to persuaded the AF that stealth should be more important than maneuverability, and AF changed their ideas. The rest are the history, the J-20 wins.
The J-19 itself actually have some relations to the J-31/35 project. Also in around 2001-2008, there is a Shenyang's stealth fighter design rumored online, called "New 93". It it said to evolved from the deep modification effort to the Flankers, they changed the sweep wings to delta wings, reshaped the cranked LEX to be a round one, and rearranged the fuselage, making the aircraft slowly became to looked less like a Flanker and more like a F-22. The final J-31/35 design could be a scaled down (the New 93 is also a heavy fighter like the J-19) version of it.
5:55 and 7:22
The initial FC-31 prototype, later being called "FC-31 1.0", is actually a demostrator, both to build an actual aircraft for the J-31 project, and to demonstrated the new way that Shenyang developed to rapidly design and build a new aircraft. This aircraft actually build in *two years* instead of four, with only 18 months for design and 6 months for construction, if my memory is right. Shenyang demostrated using digital twins to rapidly iterating the design, and using 3D printing to rapidly build prototypes. That is to said, the design method that US try to utilized in their 6th gen fighter project, has actually being used by China in their 5th gen! (I personally know someone worked in Shenyang, and his thoughts about the 'rapid interation' ideas in the NGAD is like, "They really think this is something new? Did American think only them knows how to build an aircraft digitally?" )
13:14
The J-31 have these claimed performance numbers, because PLAAF wanna it to be capable to replaced the J-10 one by one. So, almost every single performance of the initial version of J-31 are identical to the J-10C, like the maximum speed of Mach 1.8, and capable to carrying at least 4 AAMs in the internal bay.
Due to the situation of the time it was designed (J-10 was conceptualized as early as late 1980s, way before the Soviet collapse and even more way ahead of the design of Lavi - so you know it's nonsense bullshit that J-10 is a copy of Lavi. J-10 did have some relationships with Lavi in terms of avionics and other onboard system though, since Israelis sold some of their products to China after it was cancelled to retrieve some loss), the J-10 is still more or less an point-defense interceptor, and therefore have high top speed, good celling (althought official number is 50,000ft, both J-10A and J-10Cs can frequently reached above 60,000ft and still capapble to do maneuvers up to 6G+ to kill the target if they need to), in exchange of smaller internal fuel (only 2,950kg, over 500 pounds less than F-16) and shorter internal range.
But here could have some mistake - the 1,250km number should be the combat radius, not the range; it's the same combat radius that J-10C performing A2A interception mission, carrying 3x drop tanks (2x1,200 and 1x1,000kg), 2x radar homing and 2x IR homing missiles, at H-H-H profiles. The J-31, presumably as its successor, should be able to make this will only internal weapon and fuel load.
终于，有人说出了我想说的话，这些人都不认真查阅资料吗，还是故意这样的，为了贬低别人🤣🤣🤣
@@张雪雷 我回头一看心想自己得是多闲得发慌打这么多字……
@@jeffery7281 大神厉害了
漂亮!! Where can we read more of such developments? Sinodefenceforum?
The story was by the time J-11s are being produced by the end of 1990s, China was very unsatisfied with the N001 radar and domestic radar that's signifcantly lighter and better performance was inserted into the airframe. However, it messed up the aerodynamics so much that first prototype almost crashed. lead weights carefully into the radar section to make it even flyable. It took nearly half a decade of work before SAC was able to balance the plane properly by using composite material, integerade domestic systems properly via J-11Bs and later J-16s.
The earliest FC-31 verification aircraft is currently on display at the museum square of the Shenyang Aircraft Manufacturing Plant for public viewing.
@@zimingzhou4329 Sukoy57 is best
611爬墙 601卧草 现在居然可以直接进博物馆看了 感慨良多....
The FC-31, you mean. The platform has since been developed into the J-35, a carrier fighter which is slated to enter service this summer.
More like summer 2028.
@@harrypothead4575 I figured anyone following this channel knows military service entry date estimates are absolutely rubbish.
@@harrypothead4575 when has the chinese ever been late on their delivery date? if you say the indians i would understand.
The great Balat's AMCA is the strongest fighter in South Asia, and of course, there is also the South Korean KF21 in east Asia, these two fighters are the strongest in the world, there is no rival, and the other aircraft are fake
@@bvusjxlee3941 Both of which are under development, not active service aircraft, and not expected to enter service until 2030 or beyond
I like the unbiased analysis of the capabilities. Even though there had been mentioning about some "hacking", the capabilities of the Chinese being able to tweak designs for their own needs has been clearly acknowledged in this video, proving that the Chinese has their own know-how.
even if china did rip the entire plans and specs for the F-35 theres no reason why they would copy/paste it. They could just use that as a comparison for their own testing. I think it stands to reason they would afterall want to beat their adversary, not just meet them at the same level. Do consider that 20 years ago a chinese car was some 3 wheel bubble with a scooter engine and now they are mass building cars that actually meet requirements for exports - so they are clearly quite good at improvement and iteration when they put their minds to it. They will probably be flying those tictacs that we all seen in the navy ufo clips in 20 years from now
Every country conducts espionage at some level. China do tend to have a (likely justified) reputation for ignoring patents and the like, but I agree with you, I think they want the best they can build, and humans are incredible at innovation.
After WW2, a "made in Japan" sticker was synonymous with poor quality, but that changed pretty fast.
@@cerealport2726 ...? are you sure about that? I know their dentistry was pretty famous during these days, of incredible quality. As well as their planes. What products of bad quality are you speaking of?
@@korana6308 I recall Japanese consumer goods as recently as the 1970s being referred to as cheap and nasty (in far more racist terms). Germany had a reputation as for cheap copies of superior British goods as late as the first years of the 20th C. America routinely ignored patents in the 1800s. It's a phase countries go through developing their tech and manufacturing.
There are many good reasons not to copy the F-35. For all its strengths the F-35 is limited by its VTOL requirement, without which it would be a much leaner and more capable plane.
@@Splattle101 i know about racism in the US that's not news to me. Just watch WW2 cartoons, you will know exactly what I'm talking about. I was talking specifically about the quality of their products.
I gotta admit eventually the Chinese will build fighter jets or anything else that anyone in the world builds JUST AS WELL OR BETTER..
They already do,they just don't brag about it, being content that US thinks that they rule!
yeah, after stealing technologies to get there...rather than accomplishing anything on their own.
Hate to be disrespectful, but to mention J35 in the same sentence as South Korean’s and Turkey’s “5th generation”fighters is an insult to J35, which comprehensively beats F35 in all key performance indicators as published by South China Morning Post recently.
"As published by the main PRC propaganda agency."
@@cvr527the KF-21 has never been said to be 5th gen by anyone credible, it's designed as a 4.5 gen.
The KAAN just flew it's maiden flight this year, the FC-31's maiden flight was in 2013.
F35 can barely be called a 5th.... it can't supercruise
@@cvr527 so will it be published by USA?
Super cruising is not what makes a 5th gen jet 😑@@fatdoi003
Forgotten by western media only. The J31 has been in constant development. Its new engine is going online now that China solved the jet engine issues with the J20 and started mass production of the WS15 engines. The J31 is going into production soon for the new type 003 carrier. Models have been spotted on the 001 carrier already.
Good video with a well-reasoned cautious analysis. As Millenium7* has noted, this stuff is far too complicated for straight 'rip off' copying. The copying and espionage are definitely happening, but those claiming Chinese stuff is all copies are just indulging in Olympic-class cope that promotes head-in-the-sand conclusions.
On the 5th gen attributes, I confess I'm more interested in the networking capability of this and the J-20 than their stealth. The stealth is important, but it's hard to tell how valuable it is for the Chinese concept of operations. For example, if (speculating) the J-20 is intended as an AWACs & tanker killer, then moderately effective forward-aspect LO + a really good long range AAM would make a very effective combo. If that were the case, the Chinese may have made the judgement that the effort to further reduce RCS is better spent on more lethal AAMs.
The PRC are are garbage aeronautical engineers
I don't like to speak poorly of others usually if i can but Millenium 7* is just pure hyperbole click bait garbage....(but if you look deeper bs)
He claims to know how awesome Russian systems are on the unproduced Su75 and the Su57 for starters. He also seems to know how awesome the French Rafale is yet when it comes to anything American he babbles on about how it's all ordinary and insignificant. Geez he even claimed only the Europeans (specifically the French) were any good at making composite materials for stealth aircraft, that was my last straw. That channel along with it's toy vacuum cleaner Otis can rot in the manure heap that comes out there voice holes.
Sure he's entertaining but you sure don't find the biased hyperbole click bait titles and garbage info that seem to be marketed for a teen audience here on this channel.
You know some can fail when they copy from the top of their class. @@homebase5934
@@homebase5934 Annoying as his silly vacuum cleaner is, I disagree re your assertion of bias. He's been a long standing defender of the F-35 when most people were calling it crap. I regularly see a lot of his American audience get bent out of shape when he makes any reasonable criticism of US stuff, and absolutely lose their shit if he says the Chinese might be doing something other than clones. It's a weird reaction, but it's predictable as sunrise.
@@Splattle101 Yeah the F35 has no chance against the SU57 with it's tiny cheek mounted L band radars...so he claims LOL
We don't hear much about the J-20?
What you smoking bro? We don't hear about f22 because it's old and no longer in production. Su-57 because it was never in mass production or use. but j-20 just started it's mass production run and will probably continue to be upgraded with many different variations being built. From 2 seater to electronics warfare version to who knows what else.
We hear about the J-20 more than the F35
Today china had put so much money on the R & D programe for the new technology.China has also been doing innovation to the existing technologies that profitted china in international trade.
Pakistan AF is already involved in FC 31 / J-31 Gyrfalcon stealth jet project
Air Chief saying they want to buy a jet doesn't mean they're 'involved' in it'. Buying doesn't mean 'involvement' in the project.
@@averagestudent5223 Buying it means it is still continuing.
Pakistan need to help it’s poor people.Also India too.Donkeys are still on the streets instead of automobiles in Pakistan.
@@hiketee6159 buying it doesn't mean 'involved', a word used when someone is co-designing or manufacturing it.
Pakistan currently does not use twin-engine fighter aircraft, which is a financial challenge for Pakistan. Twin-engine fighters are expensive, and the fifth-generation aircraft may require a heated hangar
I don't understand why the USA makes classified aircraft design information internet accessible. It should be on a closed system.
That's because there ain't no "Classified" if it comes to airplanes anymore. The moment they roll out for a flight test, SURPRISE. (Usually 5 years before they fly as intended). Yes, you still can hide certain Technologies. But not the plane itself.
DUDE, I need to be able to remote work mmk, in the comfort of my bed while petting my hamster.
*🤭 they "put it online" so when you are beating, you can claim your opponent stole Your design, and the smear your opponent advances*
Even if you don't have the technology you can claim "the opponent is stolen from you so you don't have it anymore" just like Huawei 5G, Hypersonic weapons, TikTok (UA-cam Shorts stole from)
Like you keep on copying neighboring Chinese kids' homework after you graduate, you claim A + Chinese students keeps on stealing your design and copying your homework that is why they are so good.
The US claims they have the best technologies, while suggesting their security technology is so poor that everything is stolen by China.
Because the US government needs the Chinese to steal F35 technology, they put this information on the Internet
FC31 is designed for export,since J20 wont export
Personally, I believe if China did use copied information then it doesn't mean they are bad, reverse engineering is still quite a feat to pull.
Lol "it's not bad"
Youre absolutely clueless aren't you?
Sure, but a kit car will never be a Ferrari, little alone to beat a Ferrari.
not even remotely true. taking something apart to see how it works and then copying it isnt "quite a feat"
@@nomercyinc6783but they didn’t take anything apart?
@@nomercyinc6783okay Chump
"as with most military projects in China specifics are kept under wraps" ... Oh, you don't say? So all those projects like SR-71, U2, F-22, F-35 they were all in the public? How about the Leopard 2 or the M1A1, or the Panzerhaubitze 2000? Did they put the drawings and factoids into the public? - No. ALL Military projects are kept under wraps.
That's nothing specific to China.
Very good Pakistan Zindabad 🇵🇰
People think copying an aircraft is easy, but it's not. Changing even one inch of an aircraft means you have to change and test all the systems again. It's not like math homework where you can just copy and paste. For example, if you change the radar, you need to change all the software. If you change the missile, you need to adjust all the targeting systems. So, you can't completely copy an aircraft. Some say certain planes are copies of the F-35, but that's not true. They might be inspired by the F-35, and some technology might have been stolen by Chinese hackers. If that happened, first, the CIA should be ashamed for not noticing, and second, you should acknowledge that the Chinese are very hard-working. Competing with Western technology isn't as easy as it seems.
Except that you are not really required to do that. You can just build a worse plane. Even if your design would be inefficient. As long as it doesn't immediately break or cause instability...
Lol.
@@korana6308but that’s not what china does tho?
@@korana6308 Do you think someone would spend billions of dollars designing an inefficient and unstable aircraft to use? And hundreds of aircraft were manufactured for deployment in the Air Force. Do you think your IQ is higher than the collective IQ of tens of thousands of aircraft manufacturing engineers? If you think you are smart like this, then you must have an IQ problem.
😢 indian Haal has nothing except a photo.... This like Pakistani project Azm fifth generation stealth fighter Which has only photo 😅😅
The fact that the USAF is already looking toward an F-22 replacement is one indicator of their perception of adversaries' capabilities.
Or just a wake up call of just HOW EXPENSIVE "hide and seek-games can get, when your bloody continent can't move an inch without a serious Diplomatic incident.
the fact that F-22 replacement would be too late, and 9 bil is already allocated to upgrade the existing 180ish F-22s is one more indicator of the URGENCY of percieved problem.
they are replacing the f22 because it was built using tech from the 80s and 90s. it cant connect to the modern fleet or aircraft the way the f35 can. thats why its being replaced. civilians that dont work for government contractors dont know shit about military equipment. civilians arent experts on anything military at all .
I would say its more about they cant make anymore. So we are stuck with the numbers we currently have. The machinery and tools were destroyed and they said it would cost an enormous amount of money to re-create it all and get the production back online. For a slightly higher price you can start a new program that uses modern and current tech. Also the F-22s are very expensive to upgrade.
The USA has 35 Trillion dollars in debt and no money for bonafide police training let alone expensive fighter jet replacement programs
Stolen..it have 2 wings...Stolen because they are sitting in the fuselage ...Stolen!!!! But its better than eurofigther, and French raffles..
Don't think the Chinese would like to copy thst flying submarine F35
Make video on
jf 17 thunder by Chengdu
F35 shall not be classifed as a full 5th-gen fighter jets, as it lacks some of crucial features like supercruise and super-maneuverability
China will be using the J-31 on their aircraft carriers?
J31 range is 3500 km, combat radius is 1200 km
joke. Even body of its size that's just grain of salt
I guess you are talking about ferry range .... combat radius is what matters more.
@@AnzaChannel123 They have j20 for that.
These are confidential data no one known, but merely judging from the shape, it can be ascertained that it is much farther than the overweight fattie F35
@@ytn00b3 suree, we all know what F35 can do (its total shit, worse than j-20)
J31 is the first prototype, Shenyang aircraft Company developed its own medium-sized stealth fighter, the Chinese military did not recognize this project, and now the J35 and J31 has been completely different, it is a multi-purpose stealth fighter, and F35 will have multiple models, Shenyang aircraft Company is expanding the plant, it is estimated that soon will be mass production!
"multipurpose steal fighter" is an oxymoron. By saying that they are saying it isnt that stealthy and it isnt that fast.
1:40 lol At first, when I looked at the engine, it appeared to have an exhaust plume from the starboard engine. One with
with trust vectoring. It seemed just a bit too extreme to build scaled engines to test in a scaled aircraft for a wind tunnel test.
Looking again though it looks like a light from the floor is hitting a perfect angle to look like a vectored exhaust plume from the engine.
Chine stoles everything, HA HA! But except China's space station?
JXX is roman for J-20, And the "Concept shown @1:50 is a design, that basically got it's own ANIME series: "Supersylph Yukikaze".
J-XX just like F/A-XX (NGAD) is used to denote an unknown number.
USA propaganda 😂
They did take a few TBs if data from the F35 project. But the engines are still not good enough..
This is an incredible report on a Chinese-developed fighter jet without bias and bad taste. We need more of this type of report so that people can have better understanding regarding Chinese air force condition and development.
Soooo....
Copy pasting plans doesn't make a 5th gen fighter.
If you don't do the research, you don't know the pro's and cons of certain design points.
FWIW Russia's development programs are done in 10's (10 prototypes, 2 of those have the most recent designs and equipment and can be shown as "operational").
That is why we don't see SU-57's or T-14 Armata's (the same deal for Russian tank development. 10 prototypes, 2 rolling tanks).
Russia does their own development though. So they might know what they are talking about.
China, just copy pastes stuff and has no (ZERO) knowledge or experience.
Dunno about India....
0:02 F-35
0:08 F-35
0:10 F-35
0:15 F-35
0:17 F-35
0:45 F-35
0:52 F-35 / F-22
no originality..
the designs of the fighter jets of china was either being bought or given/handover from the US also it was developed from the LAVI figther project of israel back in 1990's..
如果1938年的德国能像中国一样保持耐心和克制，专注发展科技而不是匆匆忙忙去开战，现在的世界就是德国人的😊
Two engines copy one engine how??? 😂😂😂😂😂
By talking on this topic, you skipped the most important factor in the development of FC-31 project... The stealth design of both J20 and J31 were based on designs developed by Professor Li Tian who serves as the head designer of Shenyang Aircraft Corporation...
Now there's yet another version, the FC-31B, with 2x side weapons bays to carry 4x missiles.
We have some problem with them but that doesn't mean we can underestimate them.
After USA they have the best stealth fighter in the world, su57 is no match and others are still in development and won't come until 2030
Shenyang Aircraft Corporation is literally a state-owned enterprise. It doesn't need foreign investors like other American military industrial complex.
Australia miles away from china seems more concerned than India Next door....😀
the j-20 was came from the LAVI fighter project of israel back in 1990's.. that was a combination of design from russian and israel..
You're thinking of the J-10 smh
如果你们认为中国j31复制了f35.那么你们也复制一个好了😂
🇨🇳❤ from 🇵🇰
@@UmarKhan-zz7bb 收到
I am so sad you guys found it
I thought you would still look down on China and don't give a shit
Love the RAAF F-35A cameo!
TEMU F-35 🤣🤣🤣
I was hoping for more Australian footage
Does Australia have its own military aircraft?
the orld developes their own plains. china copies them
China will grow larger
Yes I am sure buddy.. You’re Air Force Su-57 got destroyed
Absolutely zero indication of a onboard cannon, much like the J-20. So if in its current state that's the payload capacity, this will surely drop with the addition of a cannon, if they can add one.
the Shenyang J31 is literally in production, they're already testing it, it's the basis of the J35, the J31was Shenyang's concept design without an internal weapons bay, and China did the whole RND to improve characteristics including internal weapons bay, new engine (ws19) and others...
why calll it forgotten?
My opinion is that Russia or the Mig and Sukhoi corporations will be involved in this project if it has not already started. As we all know, Russia has enough projects that are very good, but it does not have enough opportunities to complete all these projects, on the other hand, China has the money and the ability to produce everything anyone can imagine. In addition, Russia has everything it needs such as all kinds of metals and non-metals as well as gas that has been sold to China for a long time, we have all heard that Russia and China are much more Of the allies, Russia and China have the highest degree of cooperation that anyone in the world has, and that is why I think that they will work together on this aircraft, using the experience of aircraft such as the MiG-31 and the SU 57, with the help of these technologies, Russia and China can build the best aircraft in the world, in sufficient numbers for both countries.
f 35 f 22 tfx kaan su 57 .............Stylists do not decide the shape of such planes; Million dollar programs are designed this way, after thousands of calculations.
Thank you for such an unbiased review
UA-cam ⁉️ is
Deleting positive
Comments about MagnificenT
TaikonauT 🚀
💚🐉🇨🇳🐉 💚
💚 Thanks 💚
MagnificenT
💚
We need the YF 23 it was faster flew further and was more stealthy it would have been perfect for the threats of today . My lord the air force always misses the mark .
Excellent clip, thank you.
The SU -27 is the best plane China has . It is a master piece but it is no match for the F-22 in BVR .
Keunggulanya china membuatnya sendiri sedangkan yang lain hanya merakit produk AS😂
So how about S.Korea's K-21? does it can launch Guided missile now?
Every other new so called 5th gen jets looks like a baby of f22 and f35 🤣
Downvote for the hardcoded English subtitles over an English voice over. Why? It makes the video unwatchable.
Correction: J-31 The Forgotten CGI imaginary fake 5th Gen Fighter
This design didn't just fall out of a coconut tree it exists in the context of all that came before.
武器没有专利，你的我能用就是好东西
Scale model and prototype on the same year its just far more than reality .
Same way Chinese stole EV, battery, drone and 5G? lol
I hope every country will spend more on health and education than military stuff.
the J20 is a really good aircraft and China's allies should buy it
J20 isn't available for export, just like the f22
I'm sure you know that you can't buy what is not for sale.
@@eddiecharles6457 I'm sure you get that wanting China's allies to buy their crap aircraft is so they all have rubbish that will fail if it ever comes to confrontation with the west in fact having such unreliable underperforming rubbish would be the perfect deterrent to conflict but perhaps you don't get it after all
China has few allies
They don't want to be gangsters on Earth
However, Iran prefers American aircraft, such as the F14 and Bell-212
talk about the engine that the J31 has. 💰The engine makes it stealth. Not the paint!
Not a 5th gen plane again!
I heard it is going to be a naval strike fighter . You know the F/A 18 but for China .
Maybe an analogue to the F35
Being the largest and the strongest are two different things ..
when they are matched with top of line 4th gen pilots and aircraft and win then we will talk
@@massoverride478 then why US so afraid to engaged against the Chinese? 😂
Didn’t Israel often share/leak aircraft how-to to China?
Relax, this is for export, it's just business, not for war.
J15 was developed based on Su33, which Russia didn’t produce and Ukraine sold the prototype to China along with a Chinese first carrier.
WTF
4:48 I like how the highly refined simulated J-31 has a wobbly landing wheel.
F-35 combat radius on internal fuel is 1100kms, J-31 now the J-35 combat radius on internal fuel is 1200kms. The carrier will be in range of the
Chinese rocket force DF-26 missile's 4000km range.
I gotta say the 57 is pretty impressive even though it's not a TRUE stealth fighter.. The J-31 looks like a better jet all around than a J-20! I don't like Canards on a fighter jet.. They ruin stealth..
那说明你对“隐身技术”有误解。参考一下船只的隐身性你就知道鸭式布局也能确保隐身性的。57隐身性能不好主要原因是外皮的工艺粗糙造成的。
f35 is too old dude, we dont deserve that lmfao
j35 is not for bombing because china has 300 plus j16 which is equal to f15 ex.
boeing drop ball in f15 ex.
The great Balat's AMCA is the strongest fighter in South Asia, and of course, there is also the South Korean KF21 in east Asia, these two fighters are the strongest in the world, there is no rival, and the other aircraft are fake
Still on drawing board lol
@widodoakrom3938 it will much more than 5th generation plane were delay due to lack of engine capacity its complex cutting edge technology it takes time bro how many countries makes there own engine
@@Adarshpandey021 hallucinations lol
yeah knockoff to better products, very well said
Sorry to hurt the Chinese wing but real time war experience is the currency here ..the us products are way far richer ..nothing against the Chinese engineering but the best is always one step ahead (USA)..
I have a different view on this point, China now is somewhat similar to the United States during the inter-war period, with technology, capital, and industrial capability.But compared to Europe and Japan have been fighting for decades lack of war experience, but this does not prevent the U.S. military in the Second World War quickly learned from the war experience and adapted to the war, of course, in the process of adapting to the U.S. military also suffered major losses, but the strong industrial strength of the United States at that time made the U.S. military can withstand the losses and quickly recovered the strength of the war.
@@C-3POII45I4 tell me one thing just one thing in which war or a battle the Chinese planes have proven their worth…?and I abide by u that they are ahead of us ..but I say we can deal these chow mien noodles
@@C-3POII45I4 china is trying to be america ..in my view Americans still lead the world
Stolen? C'mon! Physics is physics!
The SUKOY57 Is best !