Urdu literature/music/films are created by Punjabis Poor beharis can’t even pronounce Zindgi(jindgi) Behari deny their languages like boujpuri/awadhi etc They speak ugly version of Urdu and calls it hindi
Salman Rashid Sahab is exciting to listen. He brings fact to table. It's up to you to interpret. We should be proud of our language, culture and heritage.
Chandragupta was not Jain or Buddhist.But in the end of his life he relinquished his throne and became Jain shraman and went to forest (vanprasth ashram ) as the other kings used to do at that time
He didnt go to the forest - he followed acharya bhadrabahu to southern India after taking up Jain monkhood and then took samadhi at Shravanbelagola, Karnataka. Both the acharya's and Chandragupta's footprints are still worshipped by us jains there.
Loving it ... Lots of his facts are wrong. He studied history of Punjab more from angle of Muslims and Islam and not based on geography of that area. Chandragupta Maurya was a follower of Vedic religion. Before the influence of Abrahamic religions India had very fluid inter religion changes among people. It was merely a way of thinking and practicing how to conduct your life. Though cast wise categorization was present which was also fluid that time. Different scientific studies are done on caste stratification(i.e. Intermixing of caste stopped), it was found that somewhere around 600 AD caste intermixing stopped. Chandragupta Maurya was made King by Chanakya (writer of Arthshastra) . Chanakya was Brahmin or let's say Pandit in todays terms. Chanakya was the Teacher of Chandragupta Maurya and he was greatly respected. Taxila had one of the oldest universities of the world. The destruction of the university occurred during the invasion and conquest of the region by various forces, notably the Huns and the Persian King, Shapur II.
Chandragupta Maurya was and never followed Vedic religion. As Brahmavad became dominant, India's downfall started and has not stopped. Chanakya was not Brahmin. He was respected because he was a dictator.
@@vinsin328 achha ji ye batao agar Vedic follow nhi karta tha to kya follow karta tha Jo bhi follow karta tha Bharatiya na ab ye mat kahna nhi Bo Arab se Aya tha
You will be surprised to hear that my 24-25 year old father (bachelor then) from Tamil nadu (could barely speak Hindi) was posted in Lahore in Govt service in 1945-47. They had South Indian "Messes" in their neighbourhood in Lahore where they ate dosas, idlis and suchlike everyday with occasional Carnatic music festivals.
@@indianavijay being an ambedkarite atheist I do not believe in religions . You talked about moksha without understanding basic teachings of Hinduism . No one can enter Hinduism without assigned a varna . Whenever any Hindu embraces Hinduism he or she is assigned a varna . Thereafter assigned varna becomes hereditary in the family of newly convert . Have you read varna based verses in Geeta and other books ????.
@@logicalindian9227Have u ever read gita to understand it or just know to refer to copy paste quotes ? It clearly advocates for Varna based on abilities, not hereditary. The modern equivalence of those Varnas are our professions in today's day n age.Whosoever has certain abilities and works hard to pursue it, is referred with the respective titled position as prescribed in Gita (truly).
@@logicalindian9227😂 Ever been to Thailand Srilanka or met withTibetan Buddhists. The real Buddhism. ambedkar version of Buddhism is Churxh version of Buddhism full of Hate for Hinduism 😂 Caste never goes away in Subcontinent u can switch to any religion. Every religion is Failed religion in matter of castes 😂
@@kishandubey7882 if varna was merit based changeable, convertable institution during vedic age then please highlight the answer to following queries . 1st . Why shambhuka, eklayya etc and many more like them could not receive merit based varna . ( please i am not talking about right or wrong of any event . My discussion purely on allotment of varna ) . 2nd . From vedic age to current times . How many religious , cultural, spiritual, political movements started to make varna convertible, changeable institution. Please quote examples . At least quote one single example . 3rd . Current times scene . Any organization whether rss, Arya samaj, iskon or vhp etc willing to make varna convertible, changeable institution by promoting some of their SC st cadres to the higher caste of brahmin or kshatriya. Yes or no . 4th . Whenever any non Hindu embraces Hinduism first thing done is to assign a varna to the newly converted Hindu. Thereafter assigned caste / varna becomes hereditary in the family of newly converted Hindu. Expecting a point wise reply .
Hats off to you Salman sir. It's a great honour and pleasure to hear you sir. You are true son of our subcontinent and true apostle of knowledge. Had Pakistan learnt from people like you. I am your fan. To listen you is a great blessing. 🌹🌹❤❤❤❤🙏🙏🌺
Friends across the border - I accidentally dropped into the program and I was blown away by the high quality content. Full marks to the interviewer 🎉 My deepest respect to Mr. Salman - for his reading, travel, and most importantly the level of self-introspective enlightenment he has reached. ❤ I look forward to seeing programs on both the You Tube platforms from India
@@TravelsNTrips yes certainly, inspite of ur education u Pakistan are still religious bigots... u pretend to be secular however it is very easy to discover how brainwashed ur.
23:17 there were no hard and fast religions back then, not even now, what was and is schools of thoughts. People used to leave and adopt methods to reach the divine. Chandragupta was son of the soil who adoped Jainism and retired and left the kingdom by age of 40. He left his body through fasting unto death.
We will never realise our identity or religion until we address the fact that our country was created by the British because they wanted to continue colonisation in Asia the same way they created Israel to continue colonisation in the Middle East.
Pakistan should have adopted arabic language instead of urdu to completely dissociate with India. Urdu is basically a language with hindi grammar and persian, arabic, turkish words. There are many words which are sanskrit or sanskrit derived words. You may hate sanskrit, but can't stop uttering sanskrit. Ham(I, we) is a hindi word derived from sanskrit Aham. Tum ( you) is derived from sanskrit twom.
Urdu grammar is similar to Hindi, but it also uses Farsi and Arabic grammar. As I said earlier, Urdu is not foreign to Punjab. It was the language of the Muslim educated class for hundreds of years.
@QabilAGhor Urdu is an Indian language. Moreover, language is not bound to any religion. Arabic, Farsi, Turkish languages existed before Islam, or before any religion was practiced. I do not find any reason why we should say that urdu, farsi, arabic, turkish are Islamic or Muslim language. Languages are spoken within a geographical area, that's all.
@@hsd4526 I agree that no language should be associated with any religion. Pakistani Hindus read and write in Urdu, and Urdu belongs to them as much it belongs to us. Similarly, Indian Muslims should speak Hindi or whatever language they desire. My point was that Urdu, as its name suggests, came about as a result of Farsi and Turkic speaking Muslims interacting with locals who spoke Khari Boli in Delhi. Because of the influence of Islam, and the fact that Muslim children were taught Farsi and Arabic in the old days, it became more prevalent among Muslims. Hindus focused on Sanskrit instead, and Sanskrit continues to influence Hindi.
The primary root cause of identity crises in Pakistan is based on one main historical reason. The majority of Pakistanis are Punjabis and Sindhis. There has never been any powerful historical figure, either Sindhi Muslim or Punjabi Muslim. No empire was founded by any Sindhi or Punjabi Muslim. The present Pakistani Punjab region was ruled over centuries by Afghans, Turks, Mughals, Sikhs, and British. As a matter of fact, it was only after 1947 that Punjabi Muslims became masters of that region. It is funny to observe that even today, the two main leaders are either a Pathan (Imran Khan ) or a Kashmiri ( Sharif family). The fact that they don't have native heroes means they are always looking for heroes from foreign Islamic empires. Just look at the list of people who are celebrated by Pakistanis. Muhammed Bin Kasim, Mahmud Ghaznavi, Muhammed Ghori, Timur, Babur, Aurungzeb, Ahmed Shah Abdali etc. None of these are native Sindhi or Punjabi Muslims. Even though Punjabi Muslims consider themselves to be a martial race, this is not backed up by history. They were never able to resist foreign invaders and were ruled even by a small minority of Sikhs. Furthermore, they never fought against the British except for Rai Ahmed Khan Kharal, who played a minor role in resistance against the British. By the way, their latest invented hero is a fictional character from Turkey called Ertugrul.
Pakistani Muslims are part of the larger Muslim World. There has never been a great Muslim conqueror from Egypt, Sudan, Libya, Tunisia, Syria, Lebanon, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc. but yet they all take pride in being part of the Islamic world. You see things in ethnocentric terms; we are concerned with the triumph of truth, regardless of anything else. So you and I live in different worlds.
@@QabilAGhor We all know the so-called Ummat. Everyone knows how Pakistanis are treated by the Arabs. Stop comparing Pakistan to Egypt, Sudan, Libya, Tunisia, Syria, Lebanon, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc. These countries do not have identity crises like Pakistan. We all know how concerned with the triumph of truth Pakistanis are. Your recent elections are the perfect example of the triumph of truth? You said I see things in ethnocentric terms, and then how come there are deep-rooted tensions between Sindhis, Muhajirs, Pathans, Boloch, and Punjabis? The ethnic tensions with Bengalis led to the creation of Bangladesh. Aren't these the perfect examples of ethnic strife? We surely do live in different worlds. I live in the factual world, and you live in a fictional world.
Faisal bhai, If you want to connect with the land, your land, don't jump over from IVC to Turkish invasions. There is atleast a 2,500 year gap you can not ignore, smack in the heart of Punjab. Also, if IVC had any Vedic connection, we may need to put you in a padded room! If IVC declined around 1900 BCE, RigVeda captures the continuity of "the land", "your land." Read about RigVeda. It will tell you who you are. Then jump to Mahavakyas, just a ten minute tutorial on who you really are. Then you will realize the devastation that began with Ghouri and Ghazni.
@@aadilansari5997 Ha wohi Ghori who Invaded India 17 times because he failed 16 times. Looted already rich land of India. Ghaznavi- Mahmud of Ghazni's invasion of India in the 11th century was a pivotal moment in the subcontinent's history. Mahmud, a powerful Turkic ruler, launched a series of raids into India between 1000 and 1027. His primary goal was to plunder the rich temples of northern India, most notably the famous Somnath Temple.
@@razkaraj2150 Kuffar se loot khasot jayaz hai. Sou pachaas mandarr lut gaye to kya hua , doulaat to aani jaani cheez hai. Lekan badle main idhaar ki kaali badsoorat nasl ko fi rang, aur thodi bahot khubsoorati bhi do di Ghori Ghaznavi ke mujahidon ne, iss baat se kyun inkaar karte ho?
@@aadilansari5997 Bhai India me ye sab nahi teach karte ki isse ladna ya usse ladna jayaz(justified) hai. India me mostly people live peacefully , ab tumko religion ka naam lekar ungli karni hai to idhar se danda padega bs. Khush raho. Don't bring this notion ki we are here to civilize you based on religion fir to British ne jo kiya wo accha kiya ( They also wanted to civilize whole world). This notion comes when you think you are superior. India me we don't think like that. Brother which monument Ghori and Ghaznavi made. Tum bhi Indian subcontinent ke ho. Baap Dada tumhare bhi yahi se the to jo yaha rehne wale logon ke saath Ghori and Ghaznavi ne kiya tumhare bhi kiya hoga. Don't Glorify those who plunder your land based on religion, afterall you too were Hindu before conversion.
I think while talking about the reign of Chandragupt Maurya, you seem to have omitted the role of Acharya Chanakya who was the mentor of Chandragupt Maurya and it was Chanakya who played a vital role in overthrowing the Dhana nand dynasty of Magadh and installing Chandragupt Maurya as the emperor of the Maurya dynasty. I found it a bit strange when you dismissed Chanakya as a mere Brahmin. Chanakya was also known by another name as Kautilya. His treatise on statecraft is known as Kautilya Arth Shastra which is very much relevant in today's time after a gap of 2500 years. Lastly emperor Chandragupt Maurya was very much a Hindu who embraced Jainism and not Bhudhism in the later part of his life. I think both of you need to brush up your knowledge of History.
@@maxtryme1508yes maurya Dynasty was JAINISM follower especially chandragupta maurya who took Jain diksha under sage bhadrabahu in Karnataka en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhadrab%C4%81hu Also chandragupta maurya had married daughter of dhananad,last Nanda Dynasty rulers who too were Jainism followers and so JAINISM whose ancient name is shraman dharma or shramanism was not alien to them History and ancestry of Jainism akka real saman dhamma or shraman dharma,way ancient dharma than Buddhism is way ancient and detailed than you can even imagine
@@maxtryme1508not only that,Ashoks own grandson samrat samprati also known as Jain Ashok was staunch Jainism follower and expanded Mauryan empire even beyond Afghanistan till khotan Uzbekistan and lower areas of china and down south He ruled from alternate capital of maurya Dynasty from ujjain and built several Jain temple and stupas all across his kingdom which were later appropriated by other sects and even Buddhists took over them while they clearly belong to Jainism Inscription in Brahmi and kharosti lipi were made as kharosti script was sister script of Brahmi written from right to left just like Urdu Brahmi lipi is base for writing Indian sub continent region languages including Sanskrit and various prakrits Gujurati language derived from sauraseni prakrit and lone words from Sanskrit and uses devnagari script for writing Bengali language derived from magadhi prakrit and lone Sanskrit words and later influence by Persian and arab as these people traded with people from central Asia even before abhrahamic religions ever came into existence You forget that lothal and dholavira sites of indus valley civilisation besides mighty river Saraswati and Sindhu Sagar or Arabian sea and indus river or Sindhu river were well developed port from ancient times Indian peninsular region has sea on all the three sides and gujurat sindh , down south region and even Orissa or Kalinga desh and bengal region had ports and trade relations with faraway lands 😊 Our kings too conquered and ruled far away lands and had vassal kings under them or had marital relationship with kings from other kingdoms Obviously culture exchange and people exchange happens 😉 It's natural evolution and human being is social animal and cannot live in isolation Even indus valley civilisation people had trade relations with ancient Mesopotamia and Sumerian civilization So obviously it was connected world and history of human civilization is way ancient than you can even imagine 😊 Entire universe cosmology explained in Jainism akka real shramanism Jambudweepey bharatkshetrey bharatkhundey or Arya khundey bharatvarshey........ en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jain_cosmology
Namaste Salman ji aur presenter ji. Maine ye bohot bar suna hai ki Jinha and British k karan batwara hua... Par kya Congress ki koi bhul nahi thi? Nehru, Gandhi, Sardar Patel, Maulana Azad etc.?
Regarding history and background i think we Rangadh Rajpoots migrated from Haryana to Pakistan have more knowledge, and attachment than anyother cast or comunity in Pakistan. This is a routine everyday topic and discussion in our households that what we were n our origon etc.❤
As per all the literature related to Mahabharat there is plenty of it in India in Sanskrit and now in other languages also Punjab region was the main region full of Aryans and in fact famous dharmyodh of Mahabharata was fought in Punjab region. So had a very rich history and culture which unfortunately you are not reading and identifying yourself with. In fact you are taught to hate your culture and history as if your history/ culture started only in 1947 or may be 300-400 years back only in 16th or 17th century. You need to realise that your culture is Indian and Is not Arab or Turk ( with no offence to those great cultures and civilizations just as we have our civilization) . Both Turks and Arabs also know the fact that you are not from their culture bhale hi aap unke jaise naam rakh le , pahnawa kar le.
A correction...Punjab Sindh never voted for PAKISTAN infact they had Congress government ...they never voted for Jinnaha's Muslim Leauge. Pakistan was the demand of Muslims of Bengal, UP, and MP (then called Central Provinces). These are the people you call Mohajir even today. After partion quite a few stayed back ..changed tack to lie & say we chose Gandhi
Before invention of steam engine,all works were done manually which was carried out by each caste.In Baburnama,Babur admired caste system.He says,for every work,highly skilled and traditionally trained persons of each caste are available to dispose off assigned work.So caste system was infact division of work force.Numerous caste in India indicates that this country has enriched Geography and Geology.Copper smith,Iron smith, gold smith,Carpenter,shoe makers,weaver,sailor, tailor,barber etc were traditionally trained workforce.Now caste system is diminished because of industrialisation or Mechanisation, polymers, sophistication, technical education etc.But class in society will exist forever.Now creative genius are Brahmins, soldiers or Military is kshtriya, persons related to buisness are Baishya and rests are sudras.
and you think bit open minded as well... its nice Muslim speaking Hindu view and Hindu supporting Muslim view ... but very hard for supporting opposite views with open heart and mind ...
Most Muslims and Hindus of Punjab have abandoned Punjabi, language of their forefathers , giving way to the language of Delhi and Uttar Pradesh( land of Ganga and Yamuna) in the heartland of Punjab( land of five rivers). Post Independence in one of the census Punjabi Hindus united to mention their language as Hindi, betraying language they spoke in their shops, homes and business places. Now Urdu has become language of Muslims, Hindi language of Hindus and Sikhs are probably the last heritage keepers of Punjabi left
Yes, I agree. I too have seen this decline, among Friends and Family. I am a Bengali married to a Punjabi. Both of us have roots Pakistan & Bangladesh. Bengali retains, Punjabi does not. I see this in my Friends (since my youth) into their Children.
According to you punjabi Hindu ne punjabi chodke hindi bolna start kiya 😂to Phir to jo state 1960 me punjab se tut k Hindu majority state bane himachal pradesh Delhi haryana ki official language Hindi kyu nahi hai aur punjab k Hindu aj bhi punjabi kyu bolte hai 😂aur up bihar k Hindu bhojpuri ko official language kyu bolte hai hindi kyu nahi bolte😂
Bhai tumko history ka kuch nahi pata hai punjab se tutke Hindu majority state haryana himachal pradesh bane hain aur dono state me hindi nahi boli jati dono ki official language kuch aur hai basically tumko pata bhi hai punjabi language ko hinduo ne banaya tha 1600 saal pehle thoda research karle Bhai 😅
Chandragupta did pay a lot of heed to what Brahmins said. He, infact, rose to power with the help of a Brahmin. In his last days, he died as a Jain monk. Why do Pakistani scholars lack depth.
Muslims in India with the establishment of Delhi Sultant followed by Moughals were the ruling elite. Muslims weather they came in India, from Central Asia, Afghanistan or Iran, lived and died in India. Did not go back to their ancestral homeland unlike Britishers. Muslims realised that as when, Britishers leave India, they will be ruled by Hindus due to their numerical strength, financial and educational competence. Indian Muslims also feared that they might be compelled to get converted to Hinduism like happened in Spain. Thus struggle commonly termed as Two Nations Theory, started especially after Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, to have separate home land, after departure of Britishers.
Wealthy and educated Muslims like Adam Jee from Calcutta happily and willingly opted to Pakistan, to eastanlish themselves in newly created Country but those who were poor and downtrodden were forced as result of bloodbath to migrate. Because it was very difficult to leave behind their homes, small businesses and agricultural lands.
What kind of fear In the Indian sub continent Hardly any arbi muslim Here 99 percent muslim are those who have Hindu or buddhist ancestors all muslim are converted
The fact is that we have distorted both the concept and the image of nationhood, state, culture, language, region, and religion. It was an elite-based movement for separation and was hammered in our minds from the top. Mullah who was brought in at a later stage was just a pan in the hands of the mighty. He was divisive, mean, and vicious. His knowledge and understanding of the modern state was rudimentary and far from reality. The worst part is that he could never understand the concept of the modern state and always identified himself with the larger ummah by claiming and professing that he was Muslim first and then Pakistani. That crosscut of identities further complicated the process. We try to connect everything either with the Arab world or with Afghans and celebrate the vagabonds as heroes. The facts are otherwise, we see no commonalities with these groups of people. Both came from outside for loot and plunder be it the Arabs or the plunderers from northwest. Ghaznavi was a murderer, a rapist, and a thief as were others coming from the northwest before or after him. The Arabs invaded Sindh during the Umayyad period who were nothing but land-grabbers, and the war lordship was a norm for them.
@@maqsoodchoudary1766 You are right dear.History cannot be changed now but taught properly at schools,huge task to write new books to teach the facts as they happened.People have been misled for political or whatever reasons but one to keep open mind
Jainism, Buddhism, Sikhism aur hinduism sabhi Om Shanti Shani Shanti hai. Kalinga war ke baad Samrat Ashok Buddhism apnaya aur pure viswa mein Buddhism ko failaya. Central Asia se Malesia aur China se Srilanka.
I am an ambedkarite atheist. Do not believe in religions. However all debates about identity, ancestry etc harmful for humanity. We should seek truth . Ancestry related talks nothing else but pure racism
I also think like you. The problems of world can’t be solved till this identity continues to be stuffed in mind. Human history is nothing but clashes of changing identities. What is identity: we don’t select it, it’s accidentally imposed on us at the time of birth, not our choice, we are brainwashed in it and started to treat similar human beings as others. Sometime birth identities collide as Brahamin vs Dalits, sometimes Hindu vs Muslims, sometimes linguistic as Hindi vs Gujarati, sometimes as clan Rajputs vs Arains, since last two centuries a new creation, nationalism: India Vs Pakistan vs china etc. it’s a never ending illiteracy, brainwashed people on basis of birth acquired imaginary identity. I respect your observation
No you don't learn anything from others, I am sorry. Your people are he'll be ready on destroying every other thing. Don't know why they are so insecure.
From both casts.People from upper casts retain their title.Like in Pakistan Rajputs still use their title with name. Many lower casts Hindus who converted changes their titles and added Arab or Turkic titles. Like syed mughal khiliji etc to show them Arab or Turkic. If you do their dna tests all will be 100% Indian.
Our brothers Muslim and Hindu abanded Panjabi language and Panjab. Now Sikh only fighting for it. But Sikh are very less in numbers But why our brother abandoned this land and Language
You can call it caste or varna but the fact remains that lower caste or lower varna people were always discriminated against by the upper caste or upper varna people. This discrimination is still ongoing in day to day life in today's India.
@@QabilAGhor Forget about the conditions in pre-islamic era. What are the social conditions amongst Muslims in Pakistan? Will a Syed or Rajput Muslim let his sister or daughter marry a son of marasi or Musali Muslim?
@@Karmazovyou also tell me about the conditions of so-called lower caste people in india and how it was always like this??? I don't like complete God book Quran followers so don't try to sound like them in answer because they are stupid with mouth😂
Muslim Rajputs are of two types: Dr. Asrar Ahmed type Rajput who declared that in Gawza a Hind, Hindu women would be distributed among Muslim as Loondis and jizzah would be imposed upon them ; Arif Muhammad Khan type Muslim who trace their origin to Lord Rama and resigned when Rajiv Gandhi turned aside the supreme court verdict
Not Bulle Shah infact all our mystic poets and saints were sensitive and addressed issues on political social and cultural levels. With due respect, Sir you need to go more in depth for these radiant personalities before naming their names.
I am from a place that is known as jain Kashi...we have Bahubali statue monolithic granite statue of around 900 years back. In my childhood I have had friends and it was considered as a Jasti not dharma ..and there are families that share surname and family ties but half is Hindu caste and other professes Jainism. Once minority reservation came into practice, things started to change .name of my place is Karkala in Udupi district.. Google and find out.
@@AyushGupta-rq4qu Exept Christian and Muslims take converting others as their sacred responsibility. They can adopt threat and violence as did by Francis Xavier and company in Goa during Portugese rule, inducement during British time by giving free land and now money.. muslims by violence and deception...if any person changes religion and belief.by understanding the ideology is fine...other methods are immoral, unethical and illegal..
Pakistan was so great in Sufism, till this date , it is know for it's vibrant sufi culture, but unfortunately Zia ul Haq's Arabization brought extremist Islamic interpretations to the region
This guy ones share the story that his whole family (12 person) was killed by hindus in Jalander including 2 year child. His father was saved because he was already migrated to Pakistan. If there was not 2 nations theory then why his family was butchered by hindus and sikhs in 1947? Mr Salman please answer
Chandra Gupt Maurya (he was no Bhamin) was a Hindu and was creation of Vishnu Gupt (was a Brahmin) also known as Chankaya. There is no diffrence between Hindus, Jains, Buddhist or Sikh ... conversion is a concept of Abrahmic dogmatic religions .. Muslim and Christian. Hindustan as you call it has always been historically Bharat Varsa. Also the concept of caste that u have is wrong. It were the British ...Macaulay to be precise who dug into caste created a divide so as to be able to rule. Otherwise all Bharatiya society was well organized via temple economy and its attached schools called Gurukuls.
السلام علیکم ورحمتہ اللہ وبرکاتہ حیرت کی بات ہے سلمان صاحب نے اٹھویں کلاس کے بچوں کو حقیقت بتائیے یہ تو ایسا لگتا ہے کہ یہ میری اپ بیتی ہے میں نے 1979 میں میٹرک کیا اور ہماری ٹیچر تھے انور صاحب حلکہ زندگی میں کتنے ہی ٹیچر ائے گئے ان کا نام اج بھی یاد ہے وہ بھی ہمیں یہی اسی طرح پڑھاتے تھے جو ایکچول تاریخ پڑھاتے تھے حیرت کی بات ہے کہ جب ایگزام میں ہم بیٹھے تو اور تو اور یہی سے انہوں نے کہا کہ تم لوگ وہی لکھو اور کوئی نوٹس نہیں بنائے کچھ نہیں بنائے اور جب ایگزام میں بیٹھے تو ایسا لگ رہا تھا کہ انور صاحب جو ہے وہ ہمیں ڈکٹیشن دے رہے ہیں اور ہم لکھے جارہے ہیں
If folks here do their DNA / Genome mapping, they will realise that their entire ancestry is from India/ Hindustan. Arabs / Turks were very small in numbers and their genetic influence on our ancestry is negligible
There is no difference between Pakistan and India and they are same race. But South India is different who are drvidian but follow Hindu ism. But should live together together happily and be secular.
2 nation theory is ingrained in Islam which may have been used by British. Now the British are suffering it in their own country. Punjabi Muslims are basically converted Punjabi Hindus.
Salman sahib,you are an educated man.But you should read a little more about Sir Syed Ahmad Khan.He was not a man into whose psyche anything could be "stuffed " ('thosi gayee 2 nation theory').He was for an independent India.But he visited various work places where,out of a 100 workers,only one was a muslim.He couldn't prevent schools,under municipalities, from dropping urdu from their syllabi.He saw the direction in which things were moving.For him,it dawned as a bitter truth,that the Hindus considered muslims as destroyers of their culture.And as foreign usurpers.They were not too far wrong.But for those reasons they carried great resentment against muslims.And that was a ground reality.It was not religious discrimination. The Arabs carried a similar resentment against the Turks who ruled them for 400 years.Even the Quaid did not want a divided India,initially.He moved towards separation much later. I would like to know what language Mr Rashid speaks at home with his kids.Does he speak Punjabi? Punjabi is safe.It is widely spoken.No worries.
Yes. muslims in India can still use persian names from pre islamic persia, like Rustom, Sohrab, Jamshed, Khusrau, and so on, but they are forbidden by muslim society to even mention the choice of hindu names. Now the trend may be Arabic names, but the fact is, as the late Tarek Fatih acknowledges, the roots of the pakistani Society are Hindu, not persian or arabic. the sooner they acknowledge that, the better off they will be.
Tell me, how can a country of 1.4 billion tell us Pakistanis who we are? We are 95% native sons of Indus River - a undispatble fact! Whether we are Pakhtuns, Punjabis, Kashmiri, Sindhi or Baloch we are 'sons of Indus River' and we do not take too kindly you or anybody else stick your nose in. You concentrate on finding a formule that includes 1. 4 billion.
We simply have to stick our history - Soanian civilization which adjacent to our Islamabad/Taxila from timeline going back to 100,000 years, then move forward to Mehrgarh some 8,000 years ago, moving to fabulous Mohenjo Daro, Harrapa, Gandhara, to Indo-Greeks and all the way to Muslims and English invasions. The name 'India' is of recent useage - it is English. Sindhu Safta, Hendu etc was used by Persians to describe us. As time moved forwad Hind came to include everybody. Today you and many others can thank us - India, West India, Indiana, Native Indians, Indo-China., Indonesia etc !
Don't just think too much , it was simply a British idea to destroy the subcontinent, just like they divided the middle East , Africa, Soviet union , koreas , vietnam etc etc etc !
There is some evidence that Urdu originated in Punjab, which has also produced some of the greatest Urdu poets and writers. So, Urdu is not alien to Punjab. He is making it sound as if there was some conspiracy and the British and Urdu-speaking elite were imposing Urdu on Punjabis. What's the evidence? The fact is that Urdu succeeded primarily because it was closer to Arabic and Farsi and could convey Islamic principles and thought. Punjabi simply didn't have that vocabulary or alphabet. Even now, many Punjabis cannot pronounce AYN, GHAYN, QAAF, HAA correctly. Hindi had the some issue because it too didn't have these characters along with ZA. Urdu is brilliant in the sense that its Urdu alphabet covers all sounds.
There are many Muslim countries in the world where their language is completely different from Arabic. For example Bangladesh, Malaysia, Indonesia etc. Are you trying to imply that Pakistanis are better Muslims than those because of Urdu ?
@@Karmazov Well, Urdu is our language just as Malay language is the language of Malaysia. Urdu is NOT a foreign language. It has been around, as a literary language, in all parts what is now Pakistan and India for hundreds of years, primarily among the Muslims. Yes, Pakistanis are better Muslims because of Urdu, which has vast Islamic literature. In fact, more Islamic books have been published in Urdu than in any other south Asian language. Most of the translations of Hadith books and commentaries only exist in Urdu. It would be nearly impossible to translate them into pure Punjabi or any other language of Pakistan.
He never accepted shia tewlver.. ......he remained agha Khani till last.,... Do you have any picture while doing mattam are with horse?@@maheerraja3012
Punjab never had any identity. The always remained under the control of outside power for the last 2500 years. From Cyrus the great of Persia to this day, always reporting to outsiders. Nawaz Sharif are Kashmiris
Basically he is a historian travel logger and not a language activist. Had he spoken in Punjabi, the message would have gone to limited Punjabi audience, whereas the aim was to communicate with a broader audience across the subcontinent.
A conversation with a wise man is worth a year's reading of books.
I was thinking the same.
I still remember Manto laughing at Punjabi Muslims in Lahore trying to speak Urdu.
Urdu literature/music/films are created by Punjabis
Poor beharis can’t even pronounce Zindgi(jindgi)
Behari deny their languages like boujpuri/awadhi etc
They speak ugly version of Urdu and calls it hindi
You met manto ??
Manto punjabi ke upr hsta tha sir?
@ChefbyMistake He died in 1955. How old were you when you met him?
پاکستانی اُردو ذبان پنجابی میں بولتے ہیں۔
Salman Rashid Sahab is exciting to listen. He brings fact to table. It's up to you to interpret.
We should be proud of our language, culture and heritage.
Chandragupta was not Jain or Buddhist.But in the end of his life he relinquished his throne and became Jain shraman and went to forest (vanprasth ashram ) as the other kings used to do at that time
So he was Jain.
@@vinsin328he was a hindu, who upon reaching a certain level in his life changed his way of worship to jain, to achieve moksha
He didnt go to the forest - he followed acharya bhadrabahu to southern India after taking up Jain monkhood and then took samadhi at Shravanbelagola, Karnataka. Both the acharya's and Chandragupta's footprints are still worshipped by us jains there.
There is no diff between Jain or Hindu . It’s the ploy by sickularists to seperate all dharmic ways.
@@chiragmehta8212 now you're just being dumb. they are very distinct and separate but are sister religions, but definitely very far from the same
Always pleasure to listen Salman Sir. He is true son of soil.
Loving it ...
Lots of his facts are wrong.
He studied history of Punjab more from angle of Muslims and Islam and not based on geography of that area.
Chandragupta Maurya was a follower of Vedic religion. Before the influence of Abrahamic religions India had very fluid inter religion changes among people. It was merely a way of thinking and practicing how to conduct your life.
Though cast wise categorization was present which was also fluid that time.
Different scientific studies are done on caste stratification(i.e. Intermixing of caste stopped), it was found that somewhere around 600 AD caste intermixing stopped.
Chandragupta Maurya was made King by Chanakya (writer of Arthshastra) . Chanakya was Brahmin or let's say Pandit in todays terms.
Chanakya was the Teacher of Chandragupta Maurya and he was greatly respected.
Taxila had one of the oldest universities of the world. The destruction of the university occurred during the invasion and conquest of the region by various forces, notably the Huns and the Persian King, Shapur II.
I think something major happened around 6-7 AD. You are correct sir about ossification of castes after that
Chandragupta Maurya was and never followed Vedic religion. As Brahmavad became dominant, India's downfall started and has not stopped. Chanakya was not Brahmin. He was respected because he was a dictator.
@@vinsin328chanakya was not a Brahmin then why was he keeping a skhikha and why did he call himself a Brahmin?
@@trilokyamohanchakra6351 tumney dekha chanakya ko ????
@@vinsin328 achha ji ye batao agar Vedic follow nhi karta tha to kya follow karta tha Jo bhi follow karta tha Bharatiya na ab ye mat kahna nhi Bo Arab se Aya tha
You will be surprised to hear that my 24-25 year old father (bachelor then) from Tamil nadu (could barely speak Hindi) was posted in Lahore in Govt service in 1945-47. They had South Indian "Messes" in their neighbourhood in Lahore where they ate dosas, idlis and suchlike everyday with occasional Carnatic music festivals.
"I do not have any unanswered questions" As per Hindu philosophy Salman sir has achieved MOKSHA in life . Great ,very few reached there
@@indianavijay being an ambedkarite atheist I do not believe in religions . You talked about moksha without understanding basic teachings of Hinduism . No one can enter Hinduism without assigned a varna . Whenever any Hindu embraces Hinduism he or she is assigned a varna . Thereafter assigned varna becomes hereditary in the family of newly convert . Have you read varna based verses in Geeta and other books ????.
@@logicalindian9227Have u ever read gita to understand it or just know to refer to copy paste quotes ?
It clearly advocates for Varna based on abilities, not hereditary.
The modern equivalence of those Varnas are our professions in today's day n age.Whosoever has certain abilities and works hard to pursue it, is referred with the respective titled position as prescribed in Gita (truly).
Highly illogical Indian should be your username tbh 😂@@logicalindian9227
@@logicalindian9227😂 Ever been to Thailand Srilanka or met withTibetan Buddhists. The real Buddhism. ambedkar version of Buddhism is Churxh version of Buddhism full of Hate for Hinduism 😂
Caste never goes away in Subcontinent u can switch to any religion. Every religion is Failed religion in matter of castes 😂
@@kishandubey7882 if varna was merit based changeable, convertable institution during vedic age then please highlight the answer to following queries . 1st . Why shambhuka, eklayya etc and many more like them could not receive merit based varna . ( please i am not talking about right or wrong of any event . My discussion purely on allotment of varna ) . 2nd . From vedic age to current times . How many religious , cultural, spiritual, political movements started to make varna convertible, changeable institution. Please quote examples . At least quote one single example . 3rd . Current times scene . Any organization whether rss, Arya samaj, iskon or vhp etc willing to make varna convertible, changeable institution by promoting some of their SC st cadres to the higher caste of brahmin or kshatriya. Yes or no . 4th . Whenever any non Hindu embraces Hinduism first thing done is to assign a varna to the newly converted Hindu. Thereafter assigned caste / varna becomes hereditary in the family of newly converted Hindu. Expecting a point wise reply .
Hats off to you Salman sir. It's a great honour and pleasure to hear you sir. You are true son of our subcontinent and true apostle of knowledge. Had Pakistan learnt from people like you. I am your fan. To listen you is a great blessing. 🌹🌹❤❤❤❤🙏🙏🌺
Salman saab 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 you are the treasure ...no words to describe your courage
Shankar prasad achaariya ki btayn sun kar bohut gyan mila.
Friends across the border - I accidentally dropped into the program and I was blown away by the high quality content. Full marks to the interviewer 🎉 My deepest respect to Mr. Salman - for his reading, travel, and most importantly the level of self-introspective enlightenment he has reached. ❤ I look forward to seeing programs on both the You Tube platforms from India
They are elitist of elitists
@@shortswallah4 could you please explain a bit?
@@TravelsNTrips yes certainly, inspite of ur education u Pakistan are still religious bigots... u pretend to be secular however it is very easy to discover how brainwashed ur.
@@TravelsNTrips they are super privileged person ,
danya vaad chaudhri saab.
23:17 there were no hard and fast religions back then, not even now, what was and is schools of thoughts. People used to leave and adopt methods to reach the divine. Chandragupta was son of the soil who adoped Jainism and retired and left the kingdom by age of 40. He left his body through fasting unto death.
Always a pleasure to listen to Salman Rashidji's thoughts. He has a very soothing voice.
I feel you are speaking my mind. It’s not just about religion, we are people of the land and culture.
Thank you sir 🙏🙏
We will never realise our identity or religion until we address the fact that our country was created by the British because they wanted to continue colonisation in Asia the same way they created Israel to continue colonisation in the Middle East.
Pakistan should have adopted arabic language instead of urdu to completely dissociate with India. Urdu is basically a language with hindi grammar and persian, arabic, turkish words. There are many words which are sanskrit or sanskrit derived words. You may hate sanskrit, but can't stop uttering sanskrit. Ham(I, we) is a hindi word derived from sanskrit Aham. Tum ( you) is derived from sanskrit twom.
Urdu grammar is similar to Hindi, but it also uses Farsi and Arabic grammar. As I said earlier, Urdu is not foreign to Punjab. It was the language of the Muslim educated class for hundreds of years.
@@QabilAGhorwhy you guys so bluntly fool? I really want to know why?Panjabi and Urdu kaise re ? Bhai aisa dimag kaise hai re tumhare?
@@AjayKumar-uk4sp Sorry, I don't understand what you are writing or what you mean.
@QabilAGhor Urdu is an Indian language. Moreover, language is not bound to any religion. Arabic, Farsi, Turkish languages existed before Islam, or before any religion was practiced. I do not find any reason why we should say that urdu, farsi, arabic, turkish are Islamic or Muslim language. Languages are spoken within a geographical area, that's all.
@@hsd4526 I agree that no language should be associated with any religion. Pakistani Hindus read and write in Urdu, and Urdu belongs to them as much it belongs to us. Similarly, Indian Muslims should speak Hindi or whatever language they desire. My point was that Urdu, as its name suggests, came about as a result of Farsi and Turkic speaking Muslims interacting with locals who spoke Khari Boli in Delhi. Because of the influence of Islam, and the fact that Muslim children were taught Farsi and Arabic in the old days, it became more prevalent among Muslims. Hindus focused on Sanskrit instead, and Sanskrit continues to influence Hindi.
Times glo sir I appreciate your unbiased thoughts and your Punjabi language love from u.s.a.
Salman speaks from the heart and experience.
I think he is a Punjabi chauvinist, with some inferiority complex.
He is the Arun Shourie of Pakistan… scholar
He even looks like Shourie 😂😂
@@FatJackedNerdand Arun Shourie’s family is originally from Amritsar, as is Salman sir’s.
Their ancestors and DNA are same
How I wish we had intellectuals like Him everywhere Life is not good or bad Life is all about Rationalism and Vice Versa
The primary root cause of identity crises in Pakistan is based on one main historical reason. The majority of Pakistanis are Punjabis and Sindhis. There has never been any powerful historical figure, either Sindhi Muslim or Punjabi Muslim. No empire was founded by any Sindhi or Punjabi Muslim. The present Pakistani Punjab region was ruled over centuries by Afghans, Turks, Mughals, Sikhs, and British. As a matter of fact, it was only after 1947 that Punjabi Muslims became masters of that region. It is funny to observe that even today, the two main leaders are either a Pathan (Imran Khan ) or a Kashmiri ( Sharif family).
The fact that they don't have native heroes means they are always looking for heroes from foreign Islamic empires. Just look at the list of people who are celebrated by Pakistanis. Muhammed Bin Kasim, Mahmud Ghaznavi, Muhammed Ghori, Timur, Babur, Aurungzeb, Ahmed Shah Abdali etc. None of these are native Sindhi or Punjabi Muslims.
Even though Punjabi Muslims consider themselves to be a martial race, this is not backed up by history. They were never able to resist foreign invaders and were ruled even by a small minority of Sikhs. Furthermore, they never fought against the British except for Rai Ahmed Khan Kharal, who played a minor role in resistance against the British.
By the way, their latest invented hero is a fictional character from Turkey called Ertugrul.
Pakistani Muslims are part of the larger Muslim World. There has never been a great Muslim conqueror from Egypt, Sudan, Libya, Tunisia, Syria, Lebanon, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc. but yet they all take pride in being part of the Islamic world. You see things in ethnocentric terms; we are concerned with the triumph of truth, regardless of anything else. So you and I live in different worlds.
@@QabilAGhor We all know the so-called Ummat. Everyone knows how Pakistanis are treated by the Arabs. Stop comparing Pakistan to Egypt, Sudan, Libya, Tunisia, Syria, Lebanon, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc. These countries do not have identity crises like Pakistan.
We all know how concerned with the triumph of truth Pakistanis are. Your recent elections are the perfect example of the triumph of truth?
You said I see things in ethnocentric terms, and then how come there are deep-rooted tensions between Sindhis, Muhajirs, Pathans, Boloch, and Punjabis? The ethnic tensions with Bengalis led to the creation of Bangladesh. Aren't these the perfect examples of ethnic strife?
We surely do live in different worlds. I live in the factual world, and you live in a fictional world.
@@RojaJaneman@RojaJaneman - Janeman, if you know the truth, bring the facts here.🤣
@@Karmazov My own wife is Arab, and she and her family have treated me well. Need I say more?
@@QabilAGhor We also know your Al Taqqiya, Kitman, Muruna and Tawriya
Faisal bhai,
If you want to connect with the land, your land, don't jump over from IVC to Turkish invasions. There is atleast a 2,500 year gap you can not ignore, smack in the heart of Punjab. Also, if IVC had any Vedic connection, we may need to put you in a padded room!
If IVC declined around 1900 BCE, RigVeda captures the continuity of "the land", "your land."
Read about RigVeda. It will tell you who you are. Then jump to Mahavakyas, just a ten minute tutorial on who you really are.
Then you will realize the devastation that began with Ghouri and Ghazni.
Ghori aur Ghazbavi ke shukr guzaar hai hum log , jinhone yahan ki nasl ko bandarr se isaan banane ki jaddojehad ki.
@@aadilansari5997 Ha wohi Ghori who Invaded India 17 times because he failed 16 times. Looted already rich land of India.
Ghaznavi- Mahmud of Ghazni's invasion of India in the 11th century was a pivotal moment in the subcontinent's history. Mahmud, a powerful Turkic ruler, launched a series of raids into India between 1000 and 1027. His primary goal was to plunder the rich temples of northern India, most notably the famous Somnath Temple.
yes bro true. Land's continuity is not respected therefore Identity crisis.
@@razkaraj2150 Kuffar se loot khasot jayaz hai. Sou pachaas mandarr lut gaye to kya hua , doulaat to aani jaani cheez hai. Lekan badle main idhaar ki kaali badsoorat nasl ko fi rang, aur thodi bahot khubsoorati bhi do di Ghori Ghaznavi ke mujahidon ne, iss baat se kyun inkaar karte ho?
@@aadilansari5997
Bhai India me ye sab nahi teach karte ki isse ladna ya usse ladna jayaz(justified) hai. India me mostly people live peacefully , ab tumko religion ka naam lekar ungli karni hai to idhar se danda padega bs. Khush raho.
Don't bring this notion ki we are here to civilize you based on religion fir to British ne jo kiya wo accha kiya ( They also wanted to civilize whole world).
This notion comes when you think you are superior. India me we don't think like that.
Brother which monument Ghori and Ghaznavi made.
Tum bhi Indian subcontinent ke ho. Baap Dada tumhare bhi yahi se the to jo yaha rehne wale logon ke saath Ghori and Ghaznavi ne kiya tumhare bhi kiya hoga.
Don't Glorify those who plunder your land based on religion, afterall you too were Hindu before conversion.
It is unimaginable to me how it is to bury the mother tongue and culture. Why would anyone do that to themselves?
Insecurity. Why Hindus convert to Brahmavad and stop eating beef and meat? Same reason.
I think while talking about the reign of Chandragupt Maurya, you seem to have omitted the role of Acharya Chanakya who was the mentor of Chandragupt Maurya and it was Chanakya who played a vital role in overthrowing the Dhana nand dynasty of Magadh and installing Chandragupt Maurya as the emperor of the Maurya dynasty. I found it a bit strange when you dismissed Chanakya as a mere Brahmin. Chanakya was also known by another name as Kautilya. His treatise on statecraft is known as Kautilya Arth Shastra which is very much relevant in today's time after a gap of 2500 years. Lastly emperor Chandragupt Maurya was very much a Hindu who embraced Jainism and not Bhudhism in the later part of his life. I think both of you need to brush up your knowledge of History.
Chandragupta Maurya was not Buddhist but a follower of Jainism.
Konsa nasha fukte ho
No
@@maxtryme1508yes maurya Dynasty was JAINISM follower especially chandragupta maurya who took Jain diksha under sage bhadrabahu in Karnataka
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhadrab%C4%81hu
Also chandragupta maurya had married daughter of dhananad,last Nanda Dynasty rulers who too were Jainism followers and so JAINISM whose ancient name is shraman dharma or shramanism was not alien to them
History and ancestry of Jainism akka real saman dhamma or shraman dharma,way ancient dharma than Buddhism is way ancient and detailed than you can even imagine
@@maxtryme1508not only that,Ashoks own grandson samrat samprati also known as Jain Ashok was staunch Jainism follower and expanded Mauryan empire even beyond Afghanistan till khotan Uzbekistan and lower areas of china and down south
He ruled from alternate capital of maurya Dynasty from ujjain and built several Jain temple and stupas all across his kingdom which were later appropriated by other sects and even Buddhists took over them while they clearly belong to Jainism
Inscription in Brahmi and kharosti lipi were made as kharosti script was sister script of Brahmi written from right to left just like Urdu
Brahmi lipi is base for writing Indian sub continent region languages including Sanskrit and various prakrits
Gujurati language derived from sauraseni prakrit and lone words from Sanskrit and uses devnagari script for writing
Bengali language derived from magadhi prakrit and lone Sanskrit words and later influence by Persian and arab as these people traded with people from central Asia even before abhrahamic religions ever came into existence
You forget that lothal and dholavira sites of indus valley civilisation besides mighty river Saraswati and Sindhu Sagar or Arabian sea and indus river or Sindhu river were well developed port from ancient times
Indian peninsular region has sea on all the three sides and gujurat sindh , down south region and even Orissa or Kalinga desh and bengal region had ports and trade relations with faraway lands 😊
Our kings too conquered and ruled far away lands and had vassal kings under them or had marital relationship with kings from other kingdoms
Obviously culture exchange and people exchange happens 😉
It's natural evolution and human being is social animal and cannot live in isolation
Even indus valley civilisation people had trade relations with ancient Mesopotamia and Sumerian civilization
So obviously it was connected world and history of human civilization is way ancient than you can even imagine 😊
Entire universe cosmology explained in Jainism akka real shramanism
Jambudweepey bharatkshetrey bharatkhundey or Arya khundey bharatvarshey........
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jain_cosmology
@@paulomi9351 Jainism didn't originate during nanda dynasty. And yes chandragupta was Hindu. And his son too. And Buddhism is way older that Jainism.
CHANDRAGUPTA MIGRATED TO SOUTH INDIA AND DIED AT SRAVANBELGOLA AS A JAINA.
It's okay
Namaste Salman ji aur presenter ji. Maine ye bohot bar suna hai ki Jinha and British k karan batwara hua...
Par kya Congress ki koi bhul nahi thi? Nehru, Gandhi, Sardar Patel, Maulana Azad etc.?
Regarding history and background i think we Rangadh Rajpoots migrated from Haryana to Pakistan have more knowledge, and attachment than anyother cast or comunity in Pakistan. This is a routine everyday topic and discussion in our households that what we were n our origon etc.❤
1920 tak haryanvi raghar sabhi hindu custom follow karte the 😅😅 fir tabligi jamaat ne sab pr topi laga di 😊
haryana m jo rajput the or muslim ban gye unko rangad bolte the
As per all the literature related to Mahabharat there is plenty of it in India in Sanskrit and now in other languages also Punjab region was the main region full of Aryans and in fact famous dharmyodh of Mahabharata was fought in Punjab region. So had a very rich history and culture which unfortunately you are not reading and identifying yourself with. In fact you are taught to hate your culture and history as if your history/ culture started only in 1947 or may be 300-400 years back only in 16th or 17th century.
You need to realise that your culture is Indian and Is not Arab or Turk ( with no offence to those great cultures and civilizations just as we have our civilization) . Both Turks and Arabs also know the fact that you are not from their culture bhale hi aap unke jaise naam rakh le , pahnawa kar le.
You realise it first. Do you cow beef? Myths are not history.
Both are discussing about Punjabi language while talking in Urdu
A correction...Punjab Sindh never voted for PAKISTAN infact they had Congress government ...they never voted for Jinnaha's Muslim Leauge. Pakistan was the demand of Muslims of Bengal, UP, and MP (then called Central Provinces). These are the people you call Mohajir even today. After partion quite a few stayed back ..changed tack to lie & say we chose Gandhi
Love Mr Rashid. Love from your fans in India ❤
History may written by the victors, but facts don't care about feelings.
Before invention of steam engine,all works were done manually which was carried out by each caste.In Baburnama,Babur admired caste system.He says,for every work,highly skilled and traditionally trained persons of each caste are available to dispose off assigned work.So caste system was infact division of work force.Numerous caste in India indicates that this country has enriched Geography and Geology.Copper smith,Iron smith, gold smith,Carpenter,shoe makers,weaver,sailor, tailor,barber etc were traditionally trained workforce.Now caste system is diminished because of industrialisation or Mechanisation, polymers, sophistication, technical education etc.But class in society will exist forever.Now creative genius are Brahmins, soldiers or Military is kshtriya, persons related to buisness are Baishya and rests are sudras.
Wish more Pakistanis thought like this gentleman!
And when Indians will start thinking.
and you think bit open minded as well... its nice Muslim speaking Hindu view and Hindu supporting Muslim view ... but very hard for supporting opposite views with open heart and mind ...
Old is gold @@MulaDaddy
@@vinsin328we are thinking that's why we are progressing
Han corruption ki vajah se dikkat a rahi hai lekin fir bhi
@@MulaDaddyit's okay
Most Muslims and Hindus of Punjab have abandoned Punjabi, language of their forefathers , giving way to the language of Delhi and Uttar Pradesh( land of Ganga and Yamuna) in the heartland of Punjab( land of five rivers). Post Independence in one of the census Punjabi Hindus united to mention their language as Hindi, betraying language they spoke in their shops, homes and business places. Now Urdu has become language of Muslims, Hindi language of Hindus and Sikhs are probably the last heritage keepers of Punjabi left
Agaya khalistani malecha sikhi😂.......
Apni khudki banai Hui history leke.....
Apni superiority or apni mahanta Wale kaam batane
Yes, I agree. I too have seen this decline, among Friends and Family.
I am a Bengali married to a Punjabi. Both of us have roots Pakistan & Bangladesh.
Bengali retains, Punjabi does not. I see this in my Friends (since my youth) into their Children.
According to you punjabi Hindu ne punjabi chodke hindi bolna start kiya 😂to Phir to jo state 1960 me punjab se tut k Hindu majority state bane himachal pradesh Delhi haryana ki official language Hindi kyu nahi hai aur punjab k Hindu aj bhi punjabi kyu bolte hai 😂aur up bihar k Hindu bhojpuri ko official language kyu bolte hai hindi kyu nahi bolte😂
Bhai tumko history ka kuch nahi pata hai punjab se tutke Hindu majority state haryana himachal pradesh bane hain aur dono state me hindi nahi boli jati dono ki official language kuch aur hai basically tumko pata bhi hai punjabi language ko hinduo ne banaya tha 1600 saal pehle thoda research karle Bhai 😅
@@Adam-xh3pq wahi toh sikhi ka jab koi astitva nahi tha tab Hindu Punjabi gurmukhi me Dharmik Granth likhte the....
Chandragupta did pay a lot of heed to what Brahmins said.
He, infact, rose to power with the help of a Brahmin.
In his last days, he died as a Jain monk.
Why do Pakistani scholars lack depth.
This is the problem of converts 😂😂😂😂somehow they wanted to show that they did good by converting
Oh 😱😱😱😱😱 tu to antaryami hai 😮😮
kautilya was advisor of chandra gupt , he was hindu he retired in karnataka when old and became jain monk
Salman is truly fortunate to have found answers to all the questions, reaching a state of "Prabuddh"
😂😂😂 parhe likhe anparh
Muslims in India with the establishment of Delhi Sultant followed by Moughals were the ruling elite. Muslims weather they came in India, from Central Asia, Afghanistan or Iran, lived and died in India. Did not go back to their ancestral homeland unlike Britishers. Muslims realised that as when, Britishers leave India, they will be ruled by Hindus due to their numerical strength, financial and educational competence. Indian Muslims also feared that they might be compelled to get converted to Hinduism like happened in Spain. Thus struggle commonly termed as Two Nations Theory, started especially after Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, to have separate home land, after departure of Britishers.
Then why all muslims of India didn't went to Pakistan
@ very basis of movement was to not to accept subjugation of Hindus
@@hasanmajid12 still you haven't answered the question. Why did the muslims of India choose to remain in India?
Wealthy and educated Muslims like Adam Jee from Calcutta happily and willingly opted to Pakistan, to eastanlish themselves in newly created Country but those who were poor and downtrodden were forced as result of bloodbath to migrate. Because it was very difficult to leave behind their homes, small businesses and agricultural lands.
What kind of fear
In the Indian sub continent
Hardly any arbi muslim
Here 99 percent muslim are those who have Hindu or buddhist ancestors all muslim are converted
پنجابی زبان پنجاب دی شان اور شناخت ہَے
پنجابی امیر ترین زبان ہَے
پنجابیو مذھب توں اُپر اُٹھ کے اَپنی تہذیب اور مادری زبان نوں بچاؤ
Comment written in Urdu
The fact is that we have distorted both the concept and the image of nationhood, state, culture, language, region, and religion. It was an elite-based movement for separation and was hammered in our minds from the top. Mullah who was brought in at a later stage was just a pan in the hands of the mighty. He was divisive, mean, and vicious. His knowledge and understanding of the modern state was rudimentary and far from reality. The worst part is that he could never understand the concept of the modern state and always identified himself with the larger ummah by claiming and professing that he was Muslim first and then Pakistani. That crosscut of identities further complicated the process. We try to connect everything either with the Arab world or with Afghans and celebrate the vagabonds as heroes. The facts are otherwise, we see no commonalities with these groups of people. Both came from outside for loot and plunder be it the Arabs or the plunderers from northwest. Ghaznavi was a murderer, a rapist, and a thief as were others coming from the northwest before or after him. The Arabs invaded Sindh during the Umayyad period who were nothing but land-grabbers, and the war lordship was a norm for them.
Whether they were vagabonds or watevr. It's bcz of those invasions, we Alhamdulillah r Muslims.
❤
History starts before Arab invasion of this region which is not taught in the schools of Pakistan
Love you my brothers. You suffered the most.😢
@@maqsoodchoudary1766 You are right dear.History cannot be changed now but taught properly at schools,huge task to
write new books to teach the facts as they happened.People have been misled for political or whatever reasons but one
to keep open mind
Chandragupta Maurya converted to Jainism
It was a sect and not religion...the idea of seperate religion came after independence
Jainism, Buddhism, Sikhism aur hinduism sabhi Om Shanti Shani Shanti hai. Kalinga war ke baad Samrat Ashok Buddhism apnaya aur pure viswa mein Buddhism ko failaya. Central Asia se Malesia aur China se Srilanka.
@@RavindraKamath55Do the Jains think in the same way ? So far I have not come across anything like that.
formally these are darshanas not mazhabs @@prazbhatif you understand the difference you need to use the semantics of indic languages
@@AKumar-co7oethese are separate religions both Jainism and Buddhism don’t agree agree with Vedic Hinduism. Please don’t forcibly impose any.
I am an ambedkarite atheist. Do not believe in religions. However all debates about identity, ancestry etc harmful for humanity. We should seek truth . Ancestry related talks nothing else but pure racism
😂😂😂😂😂😂..... Ambetkarite 😂😂😂😂😂
Neo Buddhism laughing as new religion by kaba sahib ambetkar
Be pende ka lota. Ambedkar was born in sanatan dharam died in sanatan dharam.Buddh DARSHAN IS PART OF SANATAN DHARAM
I also think like you. The problems of world can’t be solved till this identity continues to be stuffed in mind. Human history is nothing but clashes of changing identities. What is identity: we don’t select it, it’s accidentally imposed on us at the time of birth, not our choice, we are brainwashed in it and started to treat similar human beings as others. Sometime birth identities collide as Brahamin vs Dalits, sometimes Hindu vs Muslims, sometimes linguistic as Hindi vs Gujarati, sometimes as clan Rajputs vs Arains, since last two centuries a new creation, nationalism: India Vs Pakistan vs china etc. it’s a never ending illiteracy, brainwashed people on basis of birth acquired imaginary identity.
I respect your observation
Ambedkar was taught by Brahman and given his surname. SO DONT BR ANGRY AND MOVE ON...STOP COHOTING WITH ISLAMISTS
You're an atheist and call yourself amdekarite Kam se Kam Jo bol rahe us par toh raho
Life is not piece of land .our identity of life humanity.every thing has it's beauty.every culture is beautiful we learn a lot things from everyone.
No you don't learn anything from others, I am sorry.
Your people are he'll be ready on destroying every other thing. Don't know why they are so insecure.
Is it true that mostly low caste hindu converted into Islam to avoid caste system.?
We did research on that and will soon be posting a video on that. Stay tuned !
Nope. Low caste never convert even if you kill them. The caste system came with the Britishers.
@@vinsin328 caste to word hi Portuguese ka hai bhai
From both casts.People from upper casts retain their title.Like in Pakistan Rajputs still use their title with name.
Many lower casts Hindus who converted changes their titles and added Arab or Turkic titles.
Like syed mughal khiliji etc to show them Arab or Turkic.
If you do their dna tests all will be 100% Indian.
Our brothers Muslim and Hindu abanded Panjabi language and Panjab.
Now Sikh only fighting for it. But Sikh are very less in numbers
But why our brother abandoned this land and Language
Hindus didn't abandon Punjabi. What are u talking about?
@@theriam6281
Yes sir may be you right but situation after divide of panjab is not sameike before
@@Gurbhej-l2d bro Hindus are very careful fir there ancient knowledge history and culture bhai invaders se lade kyu the isi ko bachane ke liye bhai
English subtitles please for us internationals 🙏🏼
Caste is a British word. Hindu word is varna, professions. Not as rigid as the British theory made it to be.
You can call it caste or varna but the fact remains that lower caste or lower varna people were always discriminated against by the upper caste or upper varna people. This discrimination is still ongoing in day to day life in today's India.
To understand what the social conditions were in the pre-Islamic era, all you have to do is the read Munusmriti.
@@QabilAGhor Forget about the conditions in pre-islamic era. What are the social conditions amongst Muslims in Pakistan? Will a Syed or Rajput Muslim let his sister or daughter marry a son of marasi or Musali Muslim?
@@QabilAGhor😂😂😂😂 tell me have you read manusmriti??
Or you are just a complete God book Quran follower 😂
@@Karmazovyou also tell me about the conditions of so-called lower caste people in india and how it was always like this???
I don't like complete God book Quran followers so don't try to sound like them in answer because they are stupid with mouth😂
Muslim Rajputs are of two types: Dr. Asrar Ahmed type Rajput who declared that in Gawza a Hind, Hindu women would be distributed among Muslim as Loondis and jizzah would be imposed upon them ; Arif Muhammad Khan type Muslim who trace their origin to Lord Rama and resigned when Rajiv Gandhi turned aside the supreme court verdict
Any Rajput who is Muslim is not Rajput. It’s like saying momo was murti pujari. Not happening. Abt Rajput who is Muslim is a traitor
@@chiragmehta8212 Not necessarily. People used to become Muslims to show anti-Brahmavad.
Both are into extreme..
@@JamalKhan_Indiaarif muhmmad is not extreme 😊
yes no hindu rajput will marry into them they will come lickingbothers but hindus wont pick a fallen faith
Not Bulle Shah infact all our mystic poets and saints were sensitive and addressed issues on political social and cultural levels.
With due respect, Sir you need to go more in depth for these radiant personalities before naming their names.
I am from a place that is known as jain Kashi...we have Bahubali statue monolithic granite statue of around 900 years back. In my childhood I have had friends and it was considered as a Jasti not dharma ..and there are families that share surname and family ties but half is Hindu caste and other professes Jainism. Once minority reservation came into practice, things started to change .name of my place is Karkala in Udupi district.. Google and find out.
Ok so did people convert?
@@AyushGupta-rq4qu Exept Christian and Muslims take converting others as their sacred responsibility. They can adopt threat and violence as did by Francis Xavier and company in Goa during Portugese rule, inducement during British time by giving free land and now money.. muslims by violence and deception...if any person changes religion and belief.by understanding the ideology is fine...other methods are immoral, unethical and illegal..
Bhai start me jo short information dete ho video me uske uper coming up next likha kare achi story hogi ❤
Pakistan was so great in Sufism, till this date , it is know for it's vibrant sufi culture, but unfortunately Zia ul Haq's Arabization brought extremist Islamic interpretations to the region
In his last years , chandrgupta adopted jain dharma not buddha
This guy ones share the story that his whole family (12 person) was killed by hindus in Jalander including 2 year child. His father was saved because he was already migrated to Pakistan. If there was not 2 nations theory then why his family was butchered by hindus and sikhs in 1947? Mr Salman please answer
Plese read" freedom at mid night" Your every answer in this book brother.... नफरत की दुकान बंद करो और एक बेहतर कल की ओर बढे
مسلم ھیں ھم وطن ھے سارا جہاں ھمارا
Chandra Gupt Maurya (he was no Bhamin) was a Hindu and was creation of Vishnu Gupt (was a Brahmin) also known as Chankaya. There is no diffrence between Hindus, Jains, Buddhist or Sikh ... conversion is a concept of Abrahmic dogmatic religions .. Muslim and Christian. Hindustan as you call it has always been historically Bharat Varsa.
Also the concept of caste that u have is wrong. It were the British ...Macaulay to be precise who dug into caste created a divide so as to be able to rule. Otherwise all Bharatiya society was well organized via temple economy and its attached schools called Gurukuls.
Chanakya was chandragupt maurya's guru.He was not a Buddhist, ashoka converted to Buddhism.
How can Arabic culture be useful for people of subcontinent
السلام علیکم ورحمتہ اللہ وبرکاتہ حیرت کی بات ہے سلمان صاحب نے اٹھویں کلاس کے بچوں کو حقیقت بتائیے یہ تو ایسا لگتا ہے کہ یہ میری اپ بیتی ہے میں نے 1979 میں میٹرک کیا اور ہماری ٹیچر تھے انور صاحب حلکہ زندگی میں کتنے ہی ٹیچر ائے گئے ان کا نام اج بھی یاد ہے وہ بھی ہمیں یہی اسی طرح پڑھاتے تھے جو ایکچول تاریخ پڑھاتے تھے حیرت کی بات ہے کہ جب ایگزام میں ہم بیٹھے تو اور تو اور یہی سے انہوں نے کہا کہ تم لوگ وہی لکھو اور کوئی نوٹس نہیں بنائے کچھ نہیں بنائے اور جب ایگزام میں بیٹھے تو ایسا لگ رہا تھا کہ انور صاحب جو ہے وہ ہمیں ڈکٹیشن دے رہے ہیں اور ہم لکھے جارہے ہیں
Nice analysis
If folks here do their DNA / Genome mapping, they will realise that their entire ancestry is from India/ Hindustan. Arabs / Turks were very small in numbers and their genetic influence on our ancestry is negligible
Salman sahib ager ik admi ap ko milna chahey to kia tareeka ha
A pleasure to listen to Salman.
The only man spwaks the truth❤
Chandragupta maurya was fallower of jain religion....
You are now Al-Bakistani, just from middle east...
Chandragupta Mourya was hindu as a ruler and he retired as a Jain monk
One of the few Pakistani's who talk sense.
Smrat Ashok is a hindu smrat ❤
There is no difference between Pakistan and India and they are same race. But South India is different who are drvidian but follow Hindu ism. But should live together together happily and be secular.
Yes..they speak original indian most ancient languages.
Always refreshes the mind....... 👍.......like number 290.
24:45 bulle shah was a yogi, meditator. Someone who comes across the truth they dont need books. People with high sensitivity and attentions
2 nation theory is ingrained in Islam which may have been used by British. Now the British are suffering it in their own country.
Punjabi Muslims are basically converted Punjabi Hindus.
Punjabi hindus were forced to dance to the tune of arayan invaders
It just ended abruptly!
Sir..I.. respect u..I.. love..u...
Pakistanis I have met are nice and confident people who live their religion, culture and country. Only the workless oversmart tubers are confused 😂
بہت اچھی باتیں
شکریہ
Salman sahib,you are an educated man.But you should read a little more about Sir Syed Ahmad Khan.He was not a man into whose psyche anything could be "stuffed " ('thosi gayee 2 nation theory').He was for an independent India.But he visited various work places where,out of a 100 workers,only one was a muslim.He couldn't prevent schools,under municipalities, from dropping urdu from their syllabi.He saw the direction in which things were moving.For him,it dawned as a bitter truth,that the Hindus considered muslims as destroyers of their culture.And as foreign usurpers.They were not too far wrong.But for those reasons they carried great resentment against muslims.And that was a ground reality.It was not religious discrimination. The Arabs carried a similar resentment against the Turks who ruled them for 400 years.Even the Quaid did not want a divided India,initially.He moved towards separation much later. I would like to know what language Mr Rashid speaks at home with his kids.Does he speak Punjabi? Punjabi is safe.It is widely spoken.No worries.
Yes. muslims in India can still use persian names from pre islamic persia, like Rustom, Sohrab, Jamshed, Khusrau, and so on, but they are forbidden by muslim society to even mention the choice of hindu names. Now the trend may be Arabic names, but the fact is, as the late Tarek Fatih acknowledges, the roots of the pakistani Society are Hindu, not persian or arabic. the sooner they acknowledge that, the better off they will be.
Tell me, how can a country of 1.4 billion tell us Pakistanis who we are? We are 95% native sons of Indus River - a undispatble fact! Whether we are Pakhtuns, Punjabis, Kashmiri, Sindhi or Baloch we are 'sons of Indus River' and we do not take too kindly you or anybody else stick your nose in. You concentrate on finding a formule that includes 1. 4 billion.
We simply have to stick our history - Soanian civilization which adjacent to our Islamabad/Taxila from timeline going back to 100,000 years, then move forward to Mehrgarh some 8,000 years ago, moving to fabulous Mohenjo Daro, Harrapa, Gandhara, to Indo-Greeks and all the way to Muslims and English invasions. The name 'India' is of recent useage - it is English. Sindhu Safta, Hendu etc was used by Persians to describe us. As time moved forwad Hind came to include everybody. Today you and many others can thank us - India, West India, Indiana, Native Indians, Indo-China., Indonesia etc !
The same is true with Hindus right they are not Brahmins and 200-300 years ago, they used to eat cow beef.
@@Pakiza-Ali i think you are not educated.india is a cultural entity which has produced philosophy, maths, sculpture,Art having it's own culture 🎉
@@Pakiza-Alipakistan itself made on islamic scat.
Great man. Sherali Baig Hunzai.
Why they understand after leaving army😂😂😂
Great analysis
Kaash ap jesa koi teacher hamen bhi mil jaata. ❤
اے انٹرویو پنجابی وچ نئ ہونا چاہیدا سی؟
Don't just think too much , it was simply a British idea to destroy the subcontinent, just like they divided the middle East , Africa, Soviet union , koreas , vietnam etc etc etc !
Now Britishers are not there, so join. Koreans it was India who fought for partition of Korea. Read some history.
@@vinsin328 - India fought for partition of korea - please provide some evidence of this
@@vinsin328 oh bhai india don't involve in anything ham to non aligned movement ka hissa the bus peace kiya baat ko hogi bharat ne bhai 😊
There is some evidence that Urdu originated in Punjab, which has also produced some of the greatest Urdu poets and writers. So, Urdu is not alien to Punjab.
He is making it sound as if there was some conspiracy and the British and Urdu-speaking elite were imposing Urdu on Punjabis. What's the evidence?
The fact is that Urdu succeeded primarily because it was closer to Arabic and Farsi and could convey Islamic principles and thought. Punjabi simply didn't have that vocabulary or alphabet. Even now, many Punjabis cannot pronounce AYN, GHAYN, QAAF, HAA correctly. Hindi had the some issue because it too didn't have these characters along with ZA. Urdu is brilliant in the sense that its Urdu alphabet covers all sounds.
There are many Muslim countries in the world where their language is completely different from Arabic. For example Bangladesh, Malaysia, Indonesia etc. Are you trying to imply that Pakistanis are better Muslims than those because of Urdu ?
duffers of the highest order
Wrong, Urdu was born in what we called UP now patiyali to be specific. w@@Karmazov
@@Karmazov Well, Urdu is our language just as Malay language is the language of Malaysia. Urdu is NOT a foreign language. It has been around, as a literary language, in all parts what is now Pakistan and India for hundreds of years, primarily among the Muslims.
Yes, Pakistanis are better Muslims because of Urdu, which has vast Islamic literature. In fact, more Islamic books have been published in Urdu than in any other south Asian language. Most of the translations of Hadith books and commentaries only exist in Urdu. It would be nearly impossible to translate them into pure Punjabi or any other language of Pakistan.
@@QabilAGhor In what ways are Pakistani Muslims better than other Muslims?
Alhamdulillah Proud to be Punjabi❤
Punjab punjabi punjabiyat Zindabad
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 udta Punjab... hallelujah...
Just get lost
भारत
Salman bhai asal her chez ko bechne ke liye mazhab se jodia jata hai
Two nation theory is not based on language,dress or culture.it is based on religion.who r u.u should learn
Jinnah was also Hindu and he formed Islamic country...
Jinnah family was khoja Shia 20:01 . He converted to Twelver Shia muslim ideology later on
He never accepted shia tewlver..
......he remained agha Khani till last.,...
Do you have any picture while doing mattam are with horse?@@maheerraja3012
Sirji its Takshshila . Not Taxila
Wonderful
Punjab never had any identity. The always remained under the control of outside power for the last 2500 years. From Cyrus the great of Persia to this day, always reporting to outsiders. Nawaz Sharif are Kashmiris
90% pakistanis have hindu roots, hindu past and hindu ancestry.
❤❤❤❤ love u sir
Great man❤
پرابلم اے ہے کہ تواڈی وی ہمت نہیں ہوئی پروگرامز پنجابی بولی اچ کرن دی
Basically he is a historian travel logger and not a language activist.
Had he spoken in Punjabi, the message would have gone to limited Punjabi audience, whereas the aim was to communicate with a broader audience across the subcontinent.