A New Era - Introducing the Kodiak 900 from Daher | Feature Film

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • A New Era - Introducing the all-new Kodiak 900 from Daher.
    Instagram: / daherkodiak
    UA-cam: / kodiakaircraft
    Website: kodiak.aero
    Store: store.kodiak.aero
    #FlyKodiak #Kodiak900

КОМЕНТАРІ • 178

  • @ajjskins
    @ajjskins Рік тому +23

    I have almost 700 hours in a caravan flying for Fedex and for the last year and a half I’ve been flying the PC 12. I love both of these airplanes because of what they’re capable of and what you can do with them. Seeing that there is something that is close to a blend of these two airplanes is something I am extremely excited about. And the price point is extremely appealing. I would absolutely love to yoke one of these. Maybe some day.

  • @BadYossa
    @BadYossa 2 роки тому +98

    Absolutely no idea how this popped into my feed, but I found it fascinating and even learned a thing or two. The sense of pride in every employee was evident. Really cool vid. Thanks for enlightening me on this magnificent aircraft👍

    • @1spartacus1337
      @1spartacus1337 2 роки тому +2

      Same

    • @leeway777
      @leeway777 2 роки тому +1

      Does it have an airborne collision avoidance system (ACAS)?

  • @gianpastrana9441
    @gianpastrana9441 2 роки тому +8

    3:48 Missionary Bush Pilot I see NTK!!

  • @gkanai
    @gkanai 2 роки тому +4

    Missionary Bush Pilot is the absolute best advertisement for the Kodiak 100.

  • @KPMACHINE1
    @KPMACHINE1 2 роки тому +6

    Awesome! If I win the lottery. Until then I’ll keep rocking my lil 172.

  • @sturvinmurvin9408
    @sturvinmurvin9408 2 роки тому +4

    Goosebump overload. Woah buddy. Fantastic production! Some beautiful new lines, absolutely gorgeous!

  • @arpeltier
    @arpeltier 2 роки тому +6

    OMG. I think I am in love. ❤️

  • @JayPoe80
    @JayPoe80 2 роки тому +1

    Dream aircraft! Beautiful filming!!!!

  • @iffyaviator
    @iffyaviator 2 роки тому +14

    exactly what the Kodiak needed to be, slightly Longer.

    • @travishibbard4705
      @travishibbard4705 2 роки тому +13

      😂 what it needed was pressurization

    • @CrossWindsPat
      @CrossWindsPat 2 роки тому +1

      @@travishibbard4705 I was surprised it wasn't tbh

  • @Grampiswoodshop
    @Grampiswoodshop 2 роки тому +1

    Absolutely BEAUTIFUL!!

  • @andymunnings9109
    @andymunnings9109 Рік тому

    "I like the presentation on the Aircraf, it is absolute." 👍

  • @hamishr
    @hamishr 2 роки тому +1

    Hats-Off, what a Beast of a plane!

  • @Fazza_Vr
    @Fazza_Vr 2 роки тому +3

    Hey, I know those folks! Great team! Great airplane!

  • @newerarc4784
    @newerarc4784 2 роки тому

    A New Era indeed! cheers!

  • @ytugtbk
    @ytugtbk 2 роки тому +1

    Well made video. Looks like a cool plane purpose-built.

  • @terrancestodolka4829
    @terrancestodolka4829 2 роки тому +2

    Wow!

  • @valentinconstantin4964
    @valentinconstantin4964 2 роки тому

    The most beautiful airplane in the world. Bravo guys !

  • @mikestone9129
    @mikestone9129 Рік тому

    I love the TBM, and the thought that Daher is now holding the reins excites me. I'm in the market for a new single engine and the new Kodiak has made the choice even harder. The TBM 950 vs the Kodiak 900 is two different mission types I know, but either would work for me. Damm you Daher, I thought I had made up my mind:-)

  • @Mahlvhis
    @Mahlvhis 2 роки тому +6

    It kinda looks like a single engine MU-2. It looks awesome. Beautiful aircraft!

    • @henryburke1979
      @henryburke1979 2 роки тому +1

      dont disrespec the 900 with the MU-2

    • @johnpooky84
      @johnpooky84 2 роки тому +2

      I was thinking that it looked like a Cessna Grand Caravan.

    • @rowerwet
      @rowerwet Рік тому +1

      @@johnpooky84 it's a 2/3 caravan that cessna should have built. This nicely filled the gap between the 206 and 208.
      Cessna never would have made the 900 though, especially with the new PC12 clone their making.
      Daher took an excellent aircraft and made it a whole new beast. I expect this to knock a few caravan sales out for people needing the utility but wanting more speed.

  • @danield.8615
    @danield.8615 2 роки тому +13

    You've pictures from the Kodiak 100 P2 NTK! It's flown in PNG from Ryan. Great plane - the new one, too!
    What I like about this film is that you show the people who built & tested it.

  • @scottrichmond3400
    @scottrichmond3400 2 роки тому +5

    BEAUTIFUL Airplane. I'm torn between the PILATUS PC-12NGX and this... Both are amazing. Think I'd still go with Pilatus PC-12 NGX but also want this. But it Doesn't matter because I can't afford either unfortunately

    • @22Epic
      @22Epic 2 роки тому +1

      Pick up a used Cessna Caravan

  • @BilltheTulaneGuy
    @BilltheTulaneGuy 2 роки тому +1

    First of all…excellent production value.
    Yes it’s a beautiful plane…the wheel pants suggest vintage yet the body is all function.
    Value routes are protected.
    Out of left field algorithm suggestion.
    Thanks Algorithm!

  • @josegarciafilho
    @josegarciafilho 2 роки тому

    Just Amazing! Bravo!😍😍😍😍😍😍😍

  • @jeffhess7130
    @jeffhess7130 Рік тому

    Two 👍👍 Up For The KODIAK 900 Up Up & Away !!

  • @palanthis
    @palanthis 2 роки тому

    I'll take two.

  • @mamo-gaming
    @mamo-gaming 2 роки тому +2

  • @glennski
    @glennski 2 роки тому +1

    can't wait to fly it ……………………in MSFS

  • @mikefrench3800
    @mikefrench3800 2 роки тому +2

    Just need a bathroom now

  • @LotBoy87
    @LotBoy87 2 роки тому

    Looks slick

  • @edsonroadmoto
    @edsonroadmoto 2 роки тому +1

    And a lavatory option? 10 hours of flight time, could use one.

  • @ikay2102
    @ikay2102 2 роки тому

    I love what I see. New generation of airplanes is here.

  • @ishtiaq2000
    @ishtiaq2000 8 місяців тому

    Beautiful & Sleek Looking aircraft.
    My feedback as an A&P / Mechanical Engineer: ***Refueling panel, at the base of LH wing, is in a very wrong location.*** It should have been at a better location, likely inboard of brace on RH wing.
    Dis-Advantages of this current refueling panel location:
    **1) Clutter at LH wing:** LH side is already cluttered with many personnel during a short stop (like Baggage Handlers, Concierge & pilot) getting plane ready for the next hop. So fuel guy should be on the other side.
    **2) Vehicular Clearance:** Refueling trucks in US & many other nations are LH steering wheeled. Thus driver has better clearance sense driving a radiational Refueling truck approaching LH wing.
    **3) Ergonomics:** Not ergonomic for a single person holding a heavy pressurized refueling hose reaching current refueling location while standing at LH wheel pant. A single mishap can easily damage the window, spill on beautiful paint job, or give a bad back injury to refueler.
    If I ever own a Kodiak 900, I will do this modification myself. Just looking out for general public, if responsible at MFG wants this comment removed, LMK.

  • @deingewissen_official
    @deingewissen_official 2 роки тому

    That‘ll make a nice 3rd plane ✈️

  • @CrossWindsPat
    @CrossWindsPat 2 роки тому +1

    6:29 You mean to tell me the aerodynamics engineer's last name is Slippy... I mean if that wasn't fate I don't know what is.

  • @gerardhaubert8210
    @gerardhaubert8210 Рік тому +2

    What is the difference between the 900 and the 100?

    • @rowerwet
      @rowerwet Рік тому

      100 is a bush plane capable of landing almost anywhere a 206 can, but hauling 2 more people and cruising a bit faster and burning kerosene.
      900 is focused on cruise speed, with unimproved field capability, but needing more runway length. The interior is nicer also.
      The 900 seems like it is after some of the pc12/caravan market, but also looking to capture some government program buys.

  • @RR-Alaska
    @RR-Alaska 2 роки тому

    Wow

  • @helloeveryone906
    @helloeveryone906 Рік тому

    This aircraft look bit of every other Aircrafts.

  • @evolicious
    @evolicious 2 роки тому

    Looks like a fantastic addition to msf2020, lol

  • @sigbauer9782
    @sigbauer9782 2 роки тому +2

    This is the best commercial for Cessna that I have ever seen.

  • @gerardhaubert8210
    @gerardhaubert8210 Рік тому

    Would like to see a float version

  • @wopsterke
    @wopsterke 2 роки тому +1

    what song is that?

  • @tommyarnold890
    @tommyarnold890 Рік тому

    So I know you guys went through a lot of R&D, time, and effort into designing the wheel skirts. Is there an option or plan to allow for oversized tires for bush flying? Or are they extremely integrated into the structure of the aircraft?

  • @Flay4443
    @Flay4443 2 роки тому

    Вроде прикольный самолётик🙂

  • @josephpadula2283
    @josephpadula2283 2 роки тому +1

    What speed is the film? ASA 100?

  • @qwequ777
    @qwequ777 2 роки тому +2

    Ryan @MissionarybushPilot at 3:43?

    • @Bacardibatman
      @Bacardibatman 2 роки тому +1

      I'd deffo say the drone footage looks like some of Ryans from PNG

  • @ur_a_buS
    @ur_a_buS 2 роки тому

    What music are you playing in the intro? Composer, singers etc. Just wondering if it has something to do with the deeper thought someone put into this video and really emphasizing the meaning and origins of the word Kodiak.

  • @aky19832001
    @aky19832001 Рік тому

    Can you attach floaters to this like the k 100?

  • @kendallevans4079
    @kendallevans4079 2 роки тому

    Going from 950 ft to 1400 ft isn't a "slightly" longer take-off requirement, that is 1/3 longer!

  • @spearhead30
    @spearhead30 2 роки тому +2

    Special Missions???? Did the Air Force beat me?

  • @ajphiri3544
    @ajphiri3544 2 роки тому

    I just love everything about this plane, I'm about to buy a Ran's Rv10 now after seeing this I'm like how can I make money and pre order this

  • @haroldsartorius8163
    @haroldsartorius8163 2 роки тому

    Nice airplane, but can you hang an eclectic motorcycle under each wing and charge it inflight from solar panels on the top of the wings?

  • @miguelsuarez8010
    @miguelsuarez8010 2 роки тому

    Beautiful aircraft. I'll see how much I have in the piggy bank

  • @normangeilich
    @normangeilich 2 роки тому

    What says the EASA about this Aircraft? I guess you will get this Certification too.

  • @scotabot7826
    @scotabot7826 2 роки тому +7

    And the wheelpants still don't look right, at all.

    • @pred7949
      @pred7949 2 роки тому

      to you perhaps, and isn't it ironic that your mother has the same opinion about you. Anyway to the rest of us they look rad.

  • @ImpactWench
    @ImpactWench 2 роки тому +1

    Does the 900 need a fuel system icing inhibitor?

    • @katmaijj
      @katmaijj 2 роки тому

      If the 900 is the same as the 100. You need to add inhibitors like Prist when flying in outside temp below 5 degrees C . You cannot get Pre/mixed everywhere so you have to climb on top and refill from the wing caps… I don’t think they will or have developed a fuel heater like the latest pc 12

  • @kellyfennell4559
    @kellyfennell4559 Рік тому

    Just need a tailwheel

  • @gcarter1062
    @gcarter1062 2 роки тому +1

    I wonder what stall speed is?

  • @gailmrutland6508
    @gailmrutland6508 2 роки тому +4

    *THEY ALL CHASE PILATUS, LMAO!*

    • @pred7949
      @pred7949 2 роки тому

      and they will never catch up hahahaha pilatus ftw

  • @theaustralianconundrum
    @theaustralianconundrum Рік тому

    Apologies for being a lowly single owner/pilot of a 2016 Cessna 510 but that isn't exciting at all. I have also owned a Grand Caravan and it was competent in most conditions however when there's a decent headwind or a cell that needs avoiding? Nothing beats a twin VLJ that is up at FL410 just 25 minutes from leaving the runway.

  • @drewd7824
    @drewd7824 2 роки тому +1

    $3.5 million . Why am I watching this??

  • @Admiral_General_Aladeen_1
    @Admiral_General_Aladeen_1 2 роки тому

    Looks near like a 208

  • @johnguz76
    @johnguz76 2 роки тому

    What is the canister thing under the right wing?

  • @tillvolker1854
    @tillvolker1854 2 роки тому

    What’s that song called ?

  • @michelecutrone2798
    @michelecutrone2798 2 роки тому

    Intro song?

  • @kildersouza1623
    @kildersouza1623 2 роки тому

    👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏

  • @lilhotdog7011
    @lilhotdog7011 2 роки тому +1

    $3.5 million price… tell me again what this is doing in my recommended 😅

  • @rom1alexandre
    @rom1alexandre 2 роки тому

    anybody knows the song at 00:45 ? thanks ;)

  • @amitfahim6607
    @amitfahim6607 2 роки тому +1

    The sound design is bad, Music is too loud, I have to lower down the volume when music come and up the volume when speech comes, lol.

  • @flobie1kenobi
    @flobie1kenobi 2 роки тому

    Now just make a similar 152 and 172 version aircraft and you would dominate new single engine market. Nobody makes trainers anymore and Textron is on their ass

  • @ubermenschen3636
    @ubermenschen3636 2 роки тому +2

    Kodiak 900 is a PC12 without the fancy interior and retractable gear. Cruise a bit slower. Same big P&W PT6.

    • @thisismagacountry1318
      @thisismagacountry1318 2 роки тому

      Nietzsche says hello

    • @pred7949
      @pred7949 2 роки тому +1

      pilatus is in a completely different level my guy, do yourself a favor and see how many pc12's work in africa compared to kodiak. Kodiak 900 is a PC12 if you ordered it off of wish

    • @rowerwet
      @rowerwet Рік тому

      Also unpressurized, the 100 is a beast meant to land wherever a 206 can. The 900 charts a new territory not really in the same arena as the PC12

  • @flybyairplane3528
    @flybyairplane3528 2 роки тому +3

    I follow, ‘ BUSH MOUNTAIN PLOT, IN PNG, they are a missionary service there, where they fly some rugged grass sips, some as much as 25Degree grass strips, RYAN, IS ST OSHKOSH show
    as we speak, have a grad show,, 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

    • @zilufuzi
      @zilufuzi 2 роки тому +1

      They should have Ryan in this promotion👍

  • @jebise1126
    @jebise1126 2 роки тому

    hmmm turbo prop and not retracting landing gear? thats a bit weird combination...

    • @kaigongfu
      @kaigongfu 2 роки тому +2

      Cold weather BUSH pilots are funny about landing gear doors being frozen closed. or not retracting on one side,
      Plus retact gear that can handle rough runways is heavy and expensive, an uneeded complcation for a utlity aircraft.

    • @rowerwet
      @rowerwet Рік тому +1

      Caravan, turbo otter, twin otter, kodiak 100, Murphy moose, all disagree

  • @RobertoRMOLA
    @RobertoRMOLA 2 роки тому +3

    I hate single engine aircraft, but for the price of a Kodiak I'd buy one and a half Cessna Grand Caravan and would be much better served with space and useful cargo...

    • @CrossWindsPat
      @CrossWindsPat 2 роки тому

      single engine is ok for turbine. They are reliable enough for me to trust one engine. Id say twin for piston though, especially considering the cost compared to a turbine.

    • @RobertoRMOLA
      @RobertoRMOLA 2 роки тому

      ​@@CrossWindsPat OK, my opinion is different from yours regarding single engine vs multiengine aircraft. Period. But the issue addressed is another: given the two options, the Cessna is bigger, more efficient, more capable and cheaper. Period again.

    • @rowerwet
      @rowerwet Рік тому

      Insurance statistics prove that the second engine just gets you to the scene of the crash

    • @RobertoRMOLA
      @RobertoRMOLA Рік тому

      @@rowerwet So, according to your statement, insurance companies prefer single engine aircraft instead of multis?! Quote this "insurance statistics"! I've never heard about such thing in 45 years of aviation. But I heard A LOT about lack of multi engine training, impetuosity and negligence. And about these adjectives I'm pretty sure that insurance companies are very zealous and fierceful.

    • @rowerwet
      @rowerwet Рік тому

      @@RobertoRMOLA depends, any 135/121 operator will have a regular flight training program where engine out operations are practiced with one engine at idle, and/or in a simulator. The 135 I worked for did this every 6 months.
      The GA pilot who owns a baron or 310 probably never practices engine out, and has a few rudimentary things they've tried to memorize about how it's done. When they actually have an engine fail, they will struggle to not kill the good engine because it's trying to roll the aircraft on its back. They'll have to struggle to stand on the rudder pedal while cranking airleron trim frantically. Then have to think well ahead of the aircraft in order to use only shallow banking in order to turn, while avoiding turning towards the dead engine.
      Most part 91 pilots will struggle with this and the majority will not succeed due to a lack of practice. On one engine the aircraft is a whole different animal and losing 50% hurts performance for turning and banking.

  • @hpruijs
    @hpruijs 2 роки тому +2

    In spite of the smart reactions i received, be honest. from 17:42 on a comparison is made between outside temperature in degrees Celsius and interior temperature in degrees Fahrenheit. To me, living in Europe, that is kinda stupid. To those thinking I should go back to school, as mentioned in one of your shortsighted reactions. I won't. The USA is one of the few countries in the world that is not aware that other standards are used throughout the world, albeit not consistently like in, for instance aviation. Maybe the video is aimed at the USA, but then I can imagine that -40 Celsius gives the targeted group a headache because they cannot convert it to their beloved standard of degrees Fahrenheit...

    • @675Films
      @675Films 2 роки тому +2

      -40c IS -40f

    • @kendallevans4079
      @kendallevans4079 2 роки тому

      The USA is still the world standard. Adapt or STFU!

  • @seaplaneguy1
    @seaplaneguy1 2 роки тому

    Single point failure is not valid...

  • @namewitheld
    @namewitheld 2 роки тому +2

    Once you copied the C208's homework, the C208B was the next logical step I guess.

    • @rowerwet
      @rowerwet Рік тому

      It's way different from the 208B. The B is still a big, slow, barge of an aircraft. I spent over a decade working FedEx cargomasters.
      Cessna should have filled this hole in their lineup, instead of wasting all that money on a diesel 172.

  • @jasonhurdlow6607
    @jasonhurdlow6607 2 роки тому +1

    Really too bad that Kodiak was bought by Daher... 😔 No doubt their original mission (supplying free planes for humanitarian and missions work) was scrapped by Daher in pursuit of profits. Cool to see familiar shots of Sandpoint though (I live in Northern Idaho).

    • @pred7949
      @pred7949 2 роки тому +3

      original guys thought that charity will save their business. Dunno who gave them that idea. Its honestly for the best that daher bought them

    • @jasonhurdlow6607
      @jasonhurdlow6607 2 роки тому

      @@pred7949 It wasn't about saving the business, it was the point of it. It's soul-less without it. Just another manufacturer now instead of something special. When they opened I thought about pursuing a job with them. Kinda glad now that I didn't. I feel for the employees that believed in the original vision.

    • @pred7949
      @pred7949 2 роки тому +2

      @@jasonhurdlow6607 no good deed goes unpunished. The facts are that capitalism does more good than npo.

    • @geoffrussell4484
      @geoffrussell4484 2 роки тому

      The support of humanitarian & missions w/ discounted (never free) a/c was discontinued several owners ago.....

    • @jasonhurdlow6607
      @jasonhurdlow6607 2 роки тому

      @@geoffrussell4484 I hadn't heard. That's too bad, it's what made them special IMO.

  • @hpruijs
    @hpruijs 2 роки тому +5

    Sorry, -40 Celsius outside and 70 Fahrenheit inside. That is a comparison that doesn't make any sense to someone living in Europe and not understanding Fahrenheit at all! Neither will -40 Celsius for Americans, I can imagine, unless they are pilots...

    • @trrrewr
      @trrrewr 2 роки тому +5

      -40C is also -40F. ;)

    • @pred7949
      @pred7949 2 роки тому

      oooof hanswors you really need to work on your education

    • @JMGlider
      @JMGlider 2 роки тому

      Well if you listen carefully they also only refer to FAR certification and regulations, this is also not usefull for European operators (unless they certify the a/c as N). So yeah, this is an advert for the US market and Fahrenheit is then no strange thing.

    • @hpruijs
      @hpruijs 2 роки тому

      @@pred7949 Hey buddy, where did you get the name Hanswors from? Just curious.

    • @hpruijs
      @hpruijs 2 роки тому

      @@JMGlider Thank you, I get your point. But comparing an outside temperature in :degrees Celsius to an inside temperature in degrees Fahrentheit (17:42) does not make any sense at all. Europeans, used to Celsius, will have trouble converting the temperature in Fahrenheit to Celsius. Given the quality of education in the US I can imagine that most people have difficulties as well, no matter if they are certified an a/c as N, whatever that me be! There are people outside the USA watching videos like these, and these videos cause confusion just because of the lack of consistency in the standards used. This video may make an astonishing impression in the USA, but it is useless worldwide. I'm glad you understand that the video is not useful to European viewers. Thank you for that.

  • @toddsmith4280
    @toddsmith4280 2 роки тому

    It’s not electric, FAIL on new ERA! I guess the marketing department doesn’t know what that means.

    • @kaigongfu
      @kaigongfu 2 роки тому

      Are there any electric models with range and reserve ? maybe 10 years from now.
      sir ... were are almost out of battery, can we get in flight recharge ? - - - . . . - - - . . . - - - . . . splash.

  • @lurking0death
    @lurking0death 2 роки тому

    The dramatic crappy music at the beginning was almost enough to make me stop watching. The Kodiak speeded up? Why? Where is the market for the 900? This is a foolish concept that was designed and implemented right into competition with the Cessna Caravan except that the old Caravan already out performs the 900. Silly people.

  • @gaborbakos7058
    @gaborbakos7058 2 роки тому

    An usual PR video with full of bullshits.

  • @timizo691
    @timizo691 2 роки тому

    I’m sorry but the Kodiak 900 is ugly. I hate the look of the wheel fairings and the cargo pod just makes it look like it needs to go on a diet. 100 is so much better looking.

  • @stevemiller6053
    @stevemiller6053 2 роки тому +2

    Wow - this is the ugliest music I’ve ever heard.

    • @thisismagacountry1318
      @thisismagacountry1318 2 роки тому

      Then you need to listen to DANCE by Big Sean.
      Love The Joker, Fly Like an Eagle, and Jet Airliner btw.

    • @kaigongfu
      @kaigongfu 2 роки тому

      yes always mute YOUTube, most youtube music in videos is like an angry monkey finding love - in your ear. eh ah eh ah ahhh !
      or too many of cheesy worn out songs, so MUTE and stop the monkey love / jungle love , your ear will thank you

  • @katmaijj
    @katmaijj 2 роки тому +22

    The speed improvement is actually more than what is claimed. A K 100 with the pod cruise at about 165 Kts at 10000 . It is a completely different aircraft. Still need to see the POH to get more ideas . Only the price is the bad news !

  • @jonworthing7467
    @jonworthing7467 2 роки тому +6

    Love this plane. And the colour is brilliant. Why can’t I get a kodiak T shirt looked everywhere for one.

  • @baronvonteuchter1412
    @baronvonteuchter1412 Рік тому +2

    Lav option would be nice for a 5hr flight time!

  • @MickeLang
    @MickeLang 2 роки тому +4

    Congratulations to Daher! Amazing aircraft for it's class! Greetings from a Diamond Ferry Pilot 😉

  • @federalagenciesarecourtesans
    @federalagenciesarecourtesans 2 роки тому +1

    High wing aircraft all look the same like the car manufacturers they look the same.

    • @kaigongfu
      @kaigongfu 2 роки тому

      LMAO ou are so right, do you want a gorgeous woman or an ok looking smart woman who knows what she is doing ?
      High wing is the SUV of planes, but you can see the ground, not the wing., and if landing in brush, yoiu might get one landing with a low wing.
      modern SUV, you could remove the names and tags and many could not tell them apart, that is ALL SUV's are effing ugly, but sell like mad.

  • @patricks792
    @patricks792 2 роки тому +5

    Wow! Nice aircraft. I've loved it for awhile now. It's only gotten better. Sure wish I could afford one though.

  • @digvijaysingh4241
    @digvijaysingh4241 2 роки тому +3

    nice plane soon to be your customer

  • @Pkarchpray16
    @Pkarchpray16 2 роки тому +1

    Well im sold, Give me a job and i'll come work for you.

  • @rolandcanacolo6870
    @rolandcanacolo6870 2 роки тому +5

    well done

  • @kaigongfu
    @kaigongfu 2 роки тому +1

    Great Looking Plane, super red metallic. Way more useful than a Ferrari.

  • @Rod.Machado
    @Rod.Machado 2 роки тому +3

    Cessna's are ancient

  • @leeway777
    @leeway777 2 роки тому +1

    Is it long enough to carry a hang glider inside? Say, 215 inches long package?

  • @andrewbainton4139
    @andrewbainton4139 2 роки тому +2

    07. Kodiak Beautiful...it is that for sure!

  • @aircampilot8025
    @aircampilot8025 2 роки тому +2

    I need one

  • @TheVigilantEye77
    @TheVigilantEye77 3 місяці тому

    Music overdone

  • @MatHelm
    @MatHelm 2 роки тому +6

    How much does a Kodiak 900 cost?
    about $3.5 million

    • @johncarr123
      @johncarr123 2 роки тому +4

      Nice toy for the 1% or back country charter aircraft for serious commercial operators

    • @drewd7824
      @drewd7824 2 роки тому

      Yeah I figured if this is so fantastic and it came in my feed, this must be affordable or some fractional share. Nope just part of the 99% who can’t afford this.

  • @Jandyg
    @Jandyg 2 роки тому +5

    Wow, congratulations on a beautiful new aircraft.
    Steveo-1-kenevo needs to test fly one.