10 Most Efficient Family Airplanes

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @timothysmith7080
    @timothysmith7080 4 роки тому +422

    I think a Cessna 150 is a great family airplane... assuming its just you and your cat.

  • @Clickumentary
    @Clickumentary 3 роки тому +8

    Why did I start clicking on airplane videos? My god I need to start playing Powerball. 😂

  • @In20xx
    @In20xx 2 роки тому +3

    I'm doing research for some creative writing and I'm so glad I found this video. Thanks for making!

  • @CIOPilot
    @CIOPilot 4 роки тому +96

    Seems that you missed the PA-32 family (Cherokee 6, Lance, Saratoga line). I can carry six, but most often carry 4 people with four sets of 170 - 180 cm skis, boots, and winter gear for ski trips, or golf clubs during the summer. Club seating in the rear and a massive cargo door. Best of all, it is a single engine so maintenance / operational costs are reasonable and you can pick one up for a descent price. Recognize you are looking at aircraft currently being produced, but for many of us with families that want to fly, a current production aircraft isn't in-the-cards.

    • @Dwaynesaviation
      @Dwaynesaviation  4 роки тому +10

      Yes... I only considered airplanes that are still in production

    • @egreens8512
      @egreens8512 4 роки тому +7

      @@Dwaynesaviation Pilatus ?

    • @ConvairDart106
      @ConvairDart106 4 роки тому +3

      A descent price, as opposed to an ascending one?

    • @SantaZeede
      @SantaZeede 3 роки тому +7

      @@Dwaynesaviation Why did you only consider aircraft currently in production? The vast majority of airplane sales are used aircraft.

    • @mwb7121
      @mwb7121 3 роки тому +1

      A Cherokee 6 is certainly a good value, and still a decent performer

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent stuff bro

  • @BSnydr
    @BSnydr 3 роки тому +11

    Great video. Thanks for sharing. Can’t wait for the DA 52 RG

  • @lanceleavitt7472
    @lanceleavitt7472 3 роки тому +3

    Great research, excellent format. --- Thanks for the upload. ---

  • @OctasLP
    @OctasLP Рік тому +2

    13:55 Daher TBM 940 in GTA V is the Velum and I love this plane ✈️

  • @jimallen3392
    @jimallen3392 4 роки тому +17

    I'm very happy and grateful you will be paying for all of this. Congratulations!

  • @Spec62
    @Spec62 3 роки тому +1

    Loved the video.

  • @joey97007
    @joey97007 4 роки тому +89

    Don't let the comments about your voice over work get you down. With continued effort you will improve your English speaking ability. If you are passionate about making videos you should continue to do so.

    • @Dwaynesaviation
      @Dwaynesaviation  4 роки тому +14

      Thank you very much Joey

    • @daviejay5326
      @daviejay5326 4 роки тому +23

      Didnt even notice any issue with his English...didnt even notice an accent until I read your comment n really focused on his voice

    • @Nb005
      @Nb005 3 роки тому +10

      @@daviejay5326 Same. I actually understood this perfectly so ignore the hate comments

    • @Max-iq9lt
      @Max-iq9lt 3 роки тому +5

      I am just so pissed about all the haters saying he has a bad english. It’s sharp, infos are correct and it’s a hard work the montage. Nice work man !

    • @onebridge7231
      @onebridge7231 3 роки тому +3

      @@Dwaynesaviation Your English is fine mate. Great content, you showed me some planes I was unaware of. Keep up the good work!

  • @bertfarin8755
    @bertfarin8755 3 роки тому +10

    I concur...my first choice would also be the Diamond DA 50 CD 300. Wow, what a plane. And the demonstrator in that blue paint scheme is fantastic.

  • @HUDPilot
    @HUDPilot 3 роки тому +6

    Great video! Thanks for the vid! I am thinking about moving from my Lancair to a larger plane in the future and this helped!! Keep it up!😎😎😎😎😎😎

  • @saddas5910
    @saddas5910 3 роки тому +1

    Very detailed video

  • @rooseveltdumornay4954
    @rooseveltdumornay4954 4 роки тому +7

    That was a beautiful video. These airplanes are gorgeous. I love your narration. Love the voice over. Love the editing.

    • @Dwaynesaviation
      @Dwaynesaviation  4 роки тому +2

      Thank you very much Roosevelt.. Please where are you from?

    • @rooseveltdumornay4954
      @rooseveltdumornay4954 4 роки тому +2

      @@Dwaynesaviation I'm from Haiti

    • @Dwaynesaviation
      @Dwaynesaviation  4 роки тому

      Thank you very much....
      We'll keep making videos like this for you...
      You can request a topic

  • @malibujack4852
    @malibujack4852 4 роки тому +65

    I don’t understand why the Pilatus PC-12 isn’t on this list??? It is the ultimate suburban of the sky! And it is a very fuel efficient single turboprop. If you are going to put the TBM on your list then you really need to have the PC-12 also.

    • @MarmotSalvo
      @MarmotSalvo 4 роки тому +13

      It has more than 6 seats though. Way more expensive too. Not really a "family" plane.

    • @gunhed81
      @gunhed81 3 роки тому +3

      I was gonna say the same thing... I love PC-12 NGX even it's a 5 million dollars single turboprop plane with 1,803 nm range plus lavatory in it.

    • @placidbeach
      @placidbeach 3 роки тому +4

      These days insurance is so stringent I was told that a pc-12 (and I assume the same for a TBM) requires a professional pilot, not just dad with a commercial license, so yes these aren't really family planes.

    • @likeawhispr
      @likeawhispr 3 роки тому +4

      @@placidbeach Relatively speaking, it's probably cheaper to be that "professional pilot" if the definition means 1,500hrs or so PIC (dad will prob have that anyway) and ATP (not exactly hard to pick up). Have the wife get her ratings too, especially for the aircraft requiring a Type.

    • @placidbeach
      @placidbeach 3 роки тому +2

      @@likeawhispr actually the guy I asked about it clarified he meant like a literal full-time pilot. Otherwise that's good news! It's still good news, I didn't realize that about the ATP.

  • @donaldparlettjr3295
    @donaldparlettjr3295 4 роки тому +12

    Give me a Piper Aztec. That is the true Suburban of the air. If you can fit it in it will carry it. There is also the Cherokee 6. Their cheap in price and they are available in any configuration imaginable.

  • @Santos.Sarmento
    @Santos.Sarmento 4 роки тому +13

    Diamond DA62 a 6 to 7 pax twin piston burning Jet A-1 and easier to flight than a single is unbeatable.

    • @StickShaker21
      @StickShaker21 4 роки тому +1

      Maybe if they finally give it counter rotating props

    • @Santos.Sarmento
      @Santos.Sarmento 4 роки тому

      @@StickShaker21 you have a point but it appears that the three computers controlling the whole thing compensate it.

    • @StickShaker21
      @StickShaker21 4 роки тому +3

      @@Santos.Sarmento I seriously hope they do a better job than the 4 on the DA-42NG i fly that for a living and have had more ECU failures than I care to count. Plus computers do nothing for the horrendous Left turning tendencies that airplane has

    • @Santos.Sarmento
      @Santos.Sarmento 4 роки тому

      @@StickShaker21 I never experimented them personally so I’m just writing about others opinions and never heard about problems with the ECU (but didn’t made a deep research on it either). Good to know yours, gave me reason to learn better. Thanks.

    • @joshuashackelford6696
      @joshuashackelford6696 3 роки тому +1

      Not really a 5 or 7 pax aircraft. Just because there is that many seats doesn’t mean you can fill them.

  • @alexfrost2276
    @alexfrost2276 3 роки тому +4

    Adding subtitles with technical data would greatly increase the value of this video. Just reading text with a lot of data is not a good solution.

    • @bikersoncall
      @bikersoncall 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah, I agree, I was searching at times
      trying to figure out what he was saying ,
      not all the time, but from time to time..

  • @chrisnichols3606
    @chrisnichols3606 Рік тому +1

    My favorite would have to be the cirus vision jet, mainly because the 350 mph. Not to mention the sleek look it has.

  • @amirhosinazimi6166
    @amirhosinazimi6166 3 роки тому +1

    verygood😃😃😃👍👍

  • @bugsyunclee3968
    @bugsyunclee3968 2 роки тому +9

    A broke man here watching planes🤣

  • @bluemarshall6180
    @bluemarshall6180 3 роки тому +3

    The Millennium Falcon. 😆✌️

  • @rubenvelazquez912
    @rubenvelazquez912 3 роки тому

    Great vídeo congrats Also Nice back soundtrack

  • @wlodell
    @wlodell 3 роки тому +4

    Well done video, good narrative, informative with the right data. Thank you.

  • @moviefalk177
    @moviefalk177 2 роки тому +1

    I like the da62 ! The disgn is a 💯

  • @repentuklondonwatchman1373
    @repentuklondonwatchman1373 3 роки тому +1

    SHALOM BROTHER. I LOVE YOUR VOICE OVER. WELL DONE.

  • @dontbanmebrodontbanme5403
    @dontbanmebrodontbanme5403 3 роки тому +1

    15:39 - Announcer says that it's a Diamond DA-50 (which it is), but the label says that it's a Vision Jet!

  • @florianpasquiet2202
    @florianpasquiet2202 4 роки тому +1

    Very interesting thank you for all the information !

  • @johnsalchichon10
    @johnsalchichon10 2 роки тому +1

    There's more to just fuel when owning am aircraft. Check for insurance premiums and maintenance

  • @sorrybook4207
    @sorrybook4207 3 роки тому +5

    For someone who doesn’t know what they want I would recommend the cessna 206. It’s probably the best price for the amount of plane you get and the maintenance won’t make you cry like owning turbine does.

    • @sivispacem285
      @sivispacem285 2 роки тому +1

      Good choice. Cessna is really - the first step. But my experience differs.
      I can recommend Beechcraft Bonanza.

  • @fatrown3
    @fatrown3 2 роки тому +1

    It seems like it got less efficient over time, not more. I don't Have a license so maybe I'm not understanding.. but saving a dollar per hour here or there amd having leather does not really make up for paying an extra million on the initial purchase does it? Is this like a long term leasing option where you use the thing for a few hours per month, or is it just a favorites list? Im trying to understand the industry with only a single cell layer skin deep understanding

  • @ourdattafamily
    @ourdattafamily 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for sharing! Not going to buy a cheap aurcraft and can not afford one that has high degree of safety record. ( does not matter whose fault, need a "close to fool" proof aircraft!! ) Thanks again Dwayne!

  • @devansh3412
    @devansh3412 3 роки тому +1

    Where do we buy these privet aircraft

  • @gerardhaubert8210
    @gerardhaubert8210 4 роки тому +8

    Pilates PC-12 NGX, is the best all around value for comfort, speed, operating / maintenance costs, fuel consumption

    • @CommieCat
      @CommieCat 4 роки тому +15

      5 million USD price tag and near 3 dollar per nautical mile DOC doesn't really seem that "value"

  • @MerlinspopTBH
    @MerlinspopTBH 3 роки тому +3

    Bonanzas don’t cone with TKS. It can be had in the aftermarket, but not from the factory. Barons aren’t turbocharged. At least not in this century.

  • @ArizonaAirspace
    @ArizonaAirspace 3 роки тому +1

    That’s a good analogy comparing C 206 to large SUVs. DA 62 is a nice new twin but the cost is too high to justify it. At 1.2 Million you can get a nice clean used Citation Jets.

    • @sivispacem285
      @sivispacem285 2 роки тому

      After all COVID experiments, the situation had changed. Citations for 1,2 - is very difficult to find in good condition. Because they are able to make long-range(about 2000 nm) flights, they became popular again, among little companies and pilots.

  • @speedracer9132
    @speedracer9132 Місяць тому +1

    Bro needs to learn how to define “fuel efficient” and “family”, so many tiny planes or planes that burn excessive fuel rates

  • @nickgood8166
    @nickgood8166 2 місяці тому

    If 'efficient family aircraft' is the goal, twin is off the table.

  • @johnanderson436
    @johnanderson436 3 роки тому +1

    I liked the video.

  • @bikersoncall
    @bikersoncall 3 роки тому +6

    Awesome planes , the Diamonds aren't
    all that attractive to my eyes, but they are
    supposedly fantastic performance values.
    The JMB VL3 Evolution would fit into this
    I think, unless I missed it, + it comes with great
    stall recovery manors.

    • @BoycottChinaa
      @BoycottChinaa 2 роки тому +1

      Diamond is owned by Chy-nah now, though Austrian genes are fantastic, I wouldn't want one for empowering their military with the profits and development support

  • @drjimjam1112
    @drjimjam1112 2 роки тому +1

    Seems like you left Service Ceiling out of your data. Crucial information for anyone planning a cross country trip.

  • @jonwagner1
    @jonwagner1 2 роки тому

    The not-needed music competes with the dialogue.

  • @satishtummala5084
    @satishtummala5084 Рік тому +1

    Hard to overlook Cirrus aircrafts with their CAPS parachute safety systems

  • @arthurtompkins4386
    @arthurtompkins4386 2 роки тому +1

    What's the name of your theme music?

  • @thefireman2854
    @thefireman2854 3 роки тому +1

    @5:30 A radio controlled model airplane.?...you could not find a photo of a real G36?

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 3 роки тому +2

    The Best family aircraft that I would buy would be a TBM or Cessna Caravan

  • @olensoifer9901
    @olensoifer9901 3 роки тому +2

    You said that the FA50 burns 9 gallons per hour, and with a JetA cost of $/gallon, fuel cost is $36/gallon. You meant to say $36/hour.

  • @blanbec14
    @blanbec14 2 роки тому

    When a duck is speaking about aviation, we listen.

  • @AhmadAlAjeel
    @AhmadAlAjeel 2 роки тому +1

    The cirrus vision jet its my favorite

    • @MrJohnnyDistortion
      @MrJohnnyDistortion 10 місяців тому

      And if a bird gets sucked into the jet, then what?

    • @AhmadAlAjeel
      @AhmadAlAjeel 10 місяців тому

      @@MrJohnnyDistortion then your SOL, just use the CAPS system.
      With an engine mounted there and its small opening i doubt it will have a bird strike, probably a 1% chance of it happening.

    • @MrJohnnyDistortion
      @MrJohnnyDistortion 10 місяців тому

      @@AhmadAlAjeel
      CAPS system?

    • @AhmadAlAjeel
      @AhmadAlAjeel 10 місяців тому

      @@MrJohnnyDistortion Yes its like a parachute deployment system on the cirrus vision jet

    • @MrJohnnyDistortion
      @MrJohnnyDistortion 10 місяців тому

      @@AhmadAlAjeel
      Thanks. I'm new to aviation and learning.

  • @Meowface.
    @Meowface. 2 роки тому

    7:22 isn’t that an m600?
    I mean, it’s clearly a turboprop

  • @dforr2981
    @dforr2981 3 роки тому +2

    and how many of these planes are affordable by the average GA Pilot? Family Planes...no one I know.

  • @viorelbargan4183
    @viorelbargan4183 3 роки тому +3

    Where is Cesna 421C?

  • @hristoanastasov9495
    @hristoanastasov9495 4 роки тому +3

    The most efficient family airplane is Cessna Conquest II !!!

  • @alphajoe6660
    @alphajoe6660 3 роки тому +2

    Beechcraft Bonanza - my dream

  • @les_xr650r6
    @les_xr650r6 2 роки тому +1

    You can't avoid mentioning take off distance and whether pressurized. Also an Infograph for each one and comparative, at the end. Otherwise good. Thx

  • @dodgey0514
    @dodgey0514 3 роки тому +1

    Do you have any info on pipers m500 and m600

  • @davethemmp3763
    @davethemmp3763 4 роки тому +14

    Your hourly operating costs seem to only include fuel burn only what about maintenance and overhaul costs the King Air for example is in the $1000/ hr all in.

    • @Dwaynesaviation
      @Dwaynesaviation  4 роки тому +9

      I said: hourly fuel cost, not hourly operating cost

    • @roberthodge2771
      @roberthodge2771 4 роки тому +2

      Total costs are NOT in the average families budget I would bet.

  • @ktanner11
    @ktanner11 3 роки тому +1

    I started getting my license to take my family of 5 places. I drive truck for a living. I make 65k gross a year. Im finding there is absolutely no way i could afford my own plane. Flying is only for the rich.

    • @GoodKid98
      @GoodKid98 6 місяців тому

      Become a owner op and then you can have a hobby plane

  • @mickeydoolittle2057
    @mickeydoolittle2057 3 роки тому +2

    You should include used aircraft....

  • @totosukatendel9209
    @totosukatendel9209 4 роки тому +2

    Good idea, if beside voice of narrator there is also a written one in bottom of photo.and video.

  • @russella7263
    @russella7263 3 роки тому +1

    I like the RC model Bonanza at 5:32 so even your pet hamster can enjoy flying.

  • @tpsu129
    @tpsu129 2 роки тому +1

    2 RV-10 can fit the bill.

  • @adventuresofaidan3541
    @adventuresofaidan3541 3 роки тому +1

    What about the Saab 340

  • @MrGoodaches
    @MrGoodaches 3 роки тому +3

    No mention of “useful load”?! Useful Load has specific definition in aviation. Some of these planes can not make the range distance he narrates with a “family”. We’ll, if dad is a jockey, mom is a gymnast, and the only child is still an infant then maybe. But that maybe means the only luggage is a plastic bag with one change of underwear for everybody. The weight of the fuel needed to make the stated ranges takes up a significant amount of useful load and in some cases not much useful load remains for carrying anything that distance. Over the decades many people have been killed because pilots behaved like the number of seats were some indication of how much they can put in a plane. Neither max gross weight rating or number of seats tells you anything about how much a plane can carry. Only the Useful Load figure tells you. Some of these planes do not belong on a “family” plane list because of nearly useless Useful Load.

  • @ReemoTheCeo
    @ReemoTheCeo 2 роки тому +1

    Piper malibu 💜

  • @poolpumphelplasvegas5287
    @poolpumphelplasvegas5287 3 роки тому

    I am glad the Kennedys had a drunk 12 year old available to narrate this video.

  • @Lee_B_Futures
    @Lee_B_Futures 3 роки тому +1

    So which is best for smuggling copious amounts of cocaine? I'm asking for a friend...

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 3 роки тому +1

    Fuel Price are at a all high and the older Models Skyhawks with the 145 Continental engine is the way to go now

    • @joshgoodman5667
      @joshgoodman5667 2 роки тому

      I'm more a fan of the early '70's Skyhawks with the Lycoming 0-320-E2D engines. That low-compression, 150-horse 4-cylinder is darn near bulletproof. Lower maintenance and higher TBO than the 6-cylinder Continentals.

  • @key2010
    @key2010 4 роки тому +8

    i always wanted to know what's the cheapest plane ... uncle Ahmed has been bugging me forever, can you make a video about how much jet fuel each can carry?

  • @jlalbee
    @jlalbee 2 роки тому +1

    Piper PA-34 Seneca

  • @muhammadsteinberg
    @muhammadsteinberg 3 роки тому +2

    Unrealistic choices for the average pilot looking for a plane to haul around family or friends. Lots of lower priced used planes out there that will accomplish the job.

  • @zeyad7947
    @zeyad7947 2 роки тому

    These prices are giving me a mini heart attack

  • @kensanity178
    @kensanity178 2 роки тому +2

    I took a short trip on a small plane once. Here's what it felt like: You're on top of a piece of plywood that's hooked up to a car being driven down a dirt road by a drunk. Never again.

  • @jeffgrove5829
    @jeffgrove5829 4 роки тому +1

    What about the PA30 twin comanche?

    • @Skyprince27
      @Skyprince27 3 роки тому

      It looks like he limited himself to models still in production...

  • @overqed
    @overqed 3 роки тому +1

    I like the cirrus

  • @snotrod33
    @snotrod33 2 роки тому

    The voice..lol
    I just can't

  • @getmovingwithgareth4603
    @getmovingwithgareth4603 4 роки тому +1

    I was looking at getting a Cirrus SR22 but now thinking the Diamond DA62. Anyone have one?

    • @juaneduardobarros5364
      @juaneduardobarros5364 4 роки тому +1

      look at lancair iv too

    • @ShortFinal
      @ShortFinal 4 роки тому +3

      I would look at a flight school. they may have one you can try. My buddy flew them for his Multi and ATP training in Germany and loved it. I have yet to fly a Diamond but have sat in them and absolutely love the cockpit design. way better than any Cessna I fly.

  • @tomcrozier9548
    @tomcrozier9548 3 роки тому +2

    Nice video but I quit flying my family around in small planes after a few friends died. You either have the time to make the money to afford one of these or you have the time to stay current as a competent pilot. Few have both.

  • @ghigor70
    @ghigor70 3 роки тому +3

    I flow many twin on the past, the queen is the Beech Baron 58P!!!

  • @claudecharland5091
    @claudecharland5091 2 роки тому

    looking for the price of two seats

  • @johnogo7886
    @johnogo7886 3 роки тому +1

    TBM 940 all the way for that kind of money.

  • @juanjosefranquisasia1480
    @juanjosefranquisasia1480 3 роки тому

    Sí fuera posible enviar él vídeo actual en idioma Español Gracias.

  • @likeawhispr
    @likeawhispr 3 роки тому +4

    The twin Diamond "climes like a rocket at a little over 1,000fpm..." Rocket? I think I'd opt for a 450hp turbo prop conversion on a Cessna 206. The TBM (or PC12) would be my ultimate choice if I didn't absolutely need a twin.

    • @Meowface.
      @Meowface. 2 роки тому +1

      Then your fuel burn goes from around 10gph to somewhere near 50
      That adds up quick

    • @likeawhispr
      @likeawhispr Рік тому

      @@Meowface. The fuel price is offset by how much the 206 can haul and by the increased safety margin and performance latitude of the turbine engine. People fly single engine over the Sierras and the ocean and large lakes all the time, but that's not something I'd recommend, especially if you're in business. Fuel cost isn't what I'd be bracing for with a turbine engine - it's the OTHER costs, like having to replace a turbine wheel or some mess. Today, when it comes to performing work - single engine turbine is hard to beat for a good work/profit ratio. Piston twin is just out of its league today. 2 thirds liability, worry, and poor performance and 1 third cheap to operate compared to turbine solutions.

  • @jiayouchinese
    @jiayouchinese 2 роки тому

    Blimps are better. Imagine sitting down together for a nice family dinner, while taking a slow trip from Gary, Indiana to Beijing.

  • @Molloy1951
    @Molloy1951 Рік тому

    This narrator voice! 😂

  • @bertramharbour4166
    @bertramharbour4166 3 роки тому

    OK but you left your sound system running which makes it irritating to try and listen to the specs

  • @ZZstaff
    @ZZstaff Рік тому

    Why did you quote MPH, aircraft today use Knots

  • @someone-fh4vt
    @someone-fh4vt 2 роки тому

    I thought the intro was an ad

  • @lorettahill8058
    @lorettahill8058 3 роки тому +1

    Forget about the comments on your voice .... please !!! Did they pay for this content ? Thanks for the good info ...

  • @albertattwood2537
    @albertattwood2537 14 днів тому

    It should have had the same range as the DA 62. Then it would have been number 1

  • @Chupabrah
    @Chupabrah 2 роки тому

    MojoGripMike with a voice changing software.

  • @ivangalik7848
    @ivangalik7848 3 роки тому

    Why usually these small planes have design like from 50s.

  • @justsomerandomostrich1906
    @justsomerandomostrich1906 3 роки тому +2

    Don't know bro. Should we be discussing cost to fly instead of fuel cost? Because we all know that per hour fly cost ( engine maintenance, oils and lubricants, fuel) is much much expensive than fuel cost alone

  • @PastorRichardAllenFarmer
    @PastorRichardAllenFarmer 3 роки тому +2

    Dwayne: PLEASE put an S at the end of the word "airplane" in this video's title.

  • @davisjuarez2184
    @davisjuarez2184 2 роки тому

    Tecnam p2010??

  • @dontbanmebrodontbanme5403
    @dontbanmebrodontbanme5403 3 роки тому

    6:40 - Slip of the tongue. That's not a Meridian!

  • @Ciscoql
    @Ciscoql Рік тому

    Efficient family airplanes if price isn't an issue, of course throwing money at planes, you could get the best one lmfao

  • @o1staw682
    @o1staw682 3 роки тому

    we're 11 members!

  • @scbane
    @scbane 3 роки тому +3

    "DA 62 climgs like a rocket, at a little more than 1000fpm." Ok, boomer. Fairly anemic climb rate.

    • @bikersoncall
      @bikersoncall 3 роки тому +1

      lol, I noticed that too, I wouldn't call that
      a rocket exactly, then the next plane had
      a faster rate, but lost its rocket status. lol