2013 Ford Focus ST 250 HP 0-100 km/h & 0-100 mph Acceleration GPS
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 жов 2024
- Ford
Focus ST
11/2013
Capacity: 2.0 Liter
Turbocharged 4-Cylinder Inline Petrol Engine
Power: 184 kW (250 HP)
6-Speed Manual Transmission
18-Inch Tires
Damn that is loud ! The 2013 ST sounds great inside. The exhaust outside is getting louder after few years too !
Raced one of these today in my old e46 330ci. Was surprised in how close it was, thought I was going to get a spanking but it was neck and neck.
That's about right but little too much wheel spin off the line. This car can achieve full boost at 2k rpm so high revs at launch don't really help you here. Shifts were a little slow as well and the power peak is at 5500 rpm so probably best to shift at 6k at the most. Close to 6 seconds with a rough around the edges driving? still not bad but you can get this car into the 5s with proper technique. 0-100 in 15 seconds is also good for stock.
I agree. I own ST and above 6200-6300 it simply does not want to pull anymore. Look at the movie how speedo slowa down above 6k. At 6k you need to shiiiiiiiftt it ;-)
0-60 exactly as ford claim. Rare as manufacturers usually exaggerate
It's all changed now. They seem to always be quicker than advertised now
People hate this car Cuz of looks... But the driving expierence is so sick!
bougelaal That is because most people only see the rear ;)
+Hugh Jass slow? You might want to look up the meaning of that in the dictionary ;) Same goes for "small" it is just a normal sized family hatchback. And what is wrong with a 4 cylinder engine? Over here in Europe most cars have 4 or 3 cylinder engines, because of tax issues.
Hugh Jass Yeah, I guess in America its normal and not that expensive, in Europe it is so expensive :(
If you would buy a Ford Mustang V8 (2015) in my country (Netherlands) it would cost about €100.000 which is about $111.130,00
Why is it so f*cking expensive you ask? Because of taxes. We call it ''BPM" and it is an abbreviation of ''Belasting personen en motorvoertuigen'' or in English, car and motorbike tax''
It depends on how much emissions the car has. If we wouldn't have to pay those taxes, a mustang would cost about €64.000 or $70.000
But on the contrary we do have a nice health care system. So we got that going for us, which is nice :D
Hugh Jass dude, these cars are quick as fuck for what they are, they have almost ZERO lag when you mash the accelerator, it's almost instant acceleration...
Hugh Jass my wallet...
There seem to be a lot of owners where the engine dies shortly after 100,000kms Ford say they don't do the engines anymore so you have to find replacements from wreckers or online which can be tricky.
I thought this engine was highly reliable?
@@ewanduplessis9682 had a lot of people with the same engine issue.
@@ewanduplessis9682 It is unless it runs on american 20% ethanol juice.
Dude your killing me T_T
I got the standard, but trying to get the ST as soon as I can !!!!
The best powerband for stock STs is between 3000 and 5800. Shifting at redline isn't the best for these cars.
I never go over 5rpm, it doesn’t need it, you can, but I found 5rpm loves this rev range
You must not have this car then
@@willpark7483 yer of course not 🙄
@@sophiawoods6748 so why are you saying not to go over 5000rpm 😂
When it hooks up, it's stupid quick
lunch it at 2000 rpm to achieve it in about 6.3 more than that makes wheels spin
That's not slow,the gti is getting too much praise I think,st has some grunt to match it's price tag and it sounds a lot lot better than gti 2,sure it may not beat a gti on track but if it's at least 1-2s slower than gti its a performance bargain as well
If its somewhere the SY excels, its on track... a GTI is no match for an ST.....
Andreas Lie yaa but I had really bad experience with ST on wet,the car had almosr NO traction,Fords cars lacks traction and they are too tail happy just like Jaguars
Even the new F type has very less traction and GRIP compared with Porsche,BMW,etc
Somehow Germans make a car grip road better British arent quiet good at it,Americans are the worst
The advanatge of traction is more confidence to push even in wet and it can make good lap times,Fords always makes poor lap times compared to simarly powered VW models
But the ST has 250hp while the new GTI has 230hp, but the ST is cheaper and I think it does give you more for your money
Andreas Lie it kind of but lack of traction in a sporty hatch is a handling flaw,I wish Focus ST behaved like Fiesta ST,as of now it feels somewhat soft and it isnt perfect,its unlike fast fords thar are real drivers cars
Oh well, lets hope that the new one is a little different
Slow shifting, time might be better...
sure, but it's obviosly not his own car, so why hamering the gears in then?
Some people don't want to bang gears. Some people like to keep their cars healthy for a long time.
It's 0-100 kph is pretty quick, But in a straight drag I think it's a little slower than the outgoing 2.5t mk2 I had one wish I never sold it, but before I chipped it I'm quite certain 0-120mph was about 26-27 secs depend on how I got the gears and launch was ok. The only up side I can see here is better fuel economy and I do love the exhaust poking out the middle., really to me all the ecoboost engines prove one thing they just haven't got it like the old models.
Impressive 0-100 on all of the ecoboost cars but somewhere between 100-200 the power gets lost.
+Mark C Just mod your car,.. the stock K03 is capable of producing quarter mile times of 105+. Swap the turbo for a bigger one if you want more. If you want to keep it stock and that's not quick enough, why did you buy it to begin with? My 15 ST is stock and is not quite as strong as my 13 5.0 Mustang was but I knew this. Does that fact diminish my enjoyment of my ST? NO, because I knew all of that before I bought it and it is in many ways much more fun that my Mustang. I also plan on modding my ST later on so the point I made about it being slower than my 5.0 is rather mute.
+SirtubalotTX
Just an opinion or my observation that these ecoboost engines don't seem as strong At higher speeds Not that there any need to go 0-200kph in such a hurry but I'm sure Stock my 2007, 2.5t ST, did about 26 secs on a good run., I chipped it and put an exhaust on went quicker still, Those wet the only Mods I made. I wouldn't want to take that route of modding it to that extreme , I'm not saying it isn't nice to drive just my observation not as quick as the larger CC car it replaced . Stock v Stock
+Mark C Fair enough but you don't have to mod an MK3 to the 'extreme' to outperform a stock MK2. MK3 with stock turbo can easily surpass a stock MK2 without much difficulty and have more torque at the end of the day. Would I have liked to see more 'tune only' gains from a MK3? sure but that was not a deal breaker for me.
My opinion stands as well, you shouldn't buy a vehicle if you know it won't meet your performance expectation out of the box but I won't beat that dead horse. I've done that before too but no big deal.
Perhaps the RS will sate your appetite? That is definitely on my buy list for later on.
+SirtubalotTX
May be I loved my old car , I make you 100% right don't buy a car if it not want you want from the off, I always had that mentality, but I got nagged into buying a larger family car, and cheaper to run I made a horrible mistake of a Mondeo 1.6 ecoboost Titan X, I chipped it 190 bhp and 220+ lbs ain't bad but the car can't hold the power it terrible , so anyway I will off load it fuck her! But anyway that's was my Observation from this video but it won't guzzle fuel by the bucket load, in fairness of I'm buying another ST it will be the Mk3 ST hence my interest in this video n car.
+Mark C Lol. Why do you say the Mondeo can't hold the power? 190 at the wheel is not bad. What tune did you put on it? I don't know much about those but isn't the 2.0 turbo available for that car as well?
Although more stock power would be nice, we are definitely not suffering with the MK3. It puts down some decent number and the power curve is very desirable: Full boost at 2k can sure make up for some horsepower shortcomings and this car is a blast coming out of corners because of it. My only sniggle with the MK3 is the stock motor mounts but those are an easy swap and once you take care of those, the rest is just greedy performance upgrades. ;)
nice exhaust
that is the induction symposer, a fake exhaust note. With a cat back and tune it would be better
Für einen 4 Zylinder Turbo Dröhnt der schon ganz Ordentlich , hat der St auch diese Sound Lautsprecher am Bord damit das Auto sich Sportlicher anhört ?
+AmasraliYasin74 Ja hat er
so geil macht es mein ford focus turnier diesel. die geräusche. er schafft 230 locker, bei 250 meckert er, schaltgetriebe, neuwagen gekauft 2011 geiles auto.... ild focus
look man I have the 2016 model, last night I made an STI very very shy and I am stock, I timed my own car to 100 and best time was 5.4 sec, worst time was 5.9
oh and on the long run, I smashed the aurion sportivo by more than 100 metres
And it's funny because my friend has the 2013 model and I beat him all the time even though its virtually the same car
Exactly I got 0-60 in 5.8 seconds and ton in 14,3
Great car the 2013 ST
test "track" too short? wo testest du denn? ;)
Hat sich das ST-Board hier verabredet? :)
Here are the issues:
Shifting at redline(loses power after 5500 rpm)
Launching too hard causing wheelspin
Shifting like a grandma
Full tank of gas
swaggolass its a petrol you pillock all the power is high up
will park yeah buts it’s a turbo you fucking chump and a small one so it spools up at a low rpm and maxes out at a higher but not at the redline. Look at this cars power and you’ll see it runs out of breathe after about 5450 rpm. Your a fucking pillock
Too bad it's not a 5 cylinder 2.5 anymore, but it still sounds amazing.
Ford only had the 2.5 power plant from the volvo 850 until 2011-2012 until Ford sold volvo and put they're own 2.0 ecoboost engine in it only reason they stopped using it was for emissions and tax and the fact it was a volvo engine to begin with. Great engine none the less.
si cambias mas despacio creo que hasta ahorramos gasolina y todo
What was that sound in first gear?
Djuul tire hop
try launching at 2500 rpm. You got a bit too much wheel spin there
Exactly it needs a delicate throttle and good understanding of st throttle. Plus he was over revving it l, you only need to go to 5rpm and it still get to 100mph in 14.5 seconds , he wasn’t use the rev range correct and his 100mph time is slower, I’ve got 14.5 to a ton, and 6.1 to 60mph
Fairly full tank
ESP on - an will be 5,9s
How can I get the digital speedometer to read on it.
Pre lifts 2012 - 2014 doesn`t have digit speedo
sound is real or fake?
"Real" the intake is plumbed into the firewall. But it's just a vacuum line, so it's real noise. If you own the car and install an aftermarket exhaust, you pretty much have to remove it. The two tones conflict eachother.
Bad shift
252 horsepower correction
this is more 5.6 sec 0-60mph and 6.0 sec 0-100km/h
+JRadd135 the Driver was in error.. too much wheel spin... I too believe the car is capable of 5.6
First of all, your shifting is too slow
Secondly: too much wheel spin at launch. You were too aggressive with the throttle
Thirdly: Never try to set a 0-100km time with a full tank! That slows you down. Have, at most, a quarter.
Just give these a shot if you still have the ST
First of all, this is a synchronized gearbox - it's totally ignorant to kick the shifter because this isn't the last time driver uses this car.
Secondly: wheel spin doesn't affect the acceleration if the car is FWD.
Thirdly: he doesn't only have the full fuel tank, but the wheel in the back, rear seats, interior panels etc. You can take everything out, but will the video be useless as the car is not for racing but for sporty everyday drive?
First of all, my brother owns an ST and I've driven it on multiple occasions and yes, you can shift faster.
Secondly, wheel spin = no traction which means you can't get the power down. Front wheel drive or not, the physics is still the same.
Thirdly, 0-60 times are done when the car is at it's lightest to give the fastest acceleration. More weight = slower car.
Khanyiso Mapuma wouldn't the optimum time to shift be around 5,500-5,800 RPM's...maybe at 6,000 RPM's max to get the best shifts for this car?
klogg4 Wheelspin doesn’t affect the acceleration??? Dude I’d stop smoking drugs you clearly know nothing about cars
My 270whp saab 93 aero would eat that alive!
+xStiggymeisteRx haahah are you on crqack?
+Cartman5101 nah mate 0-100 kph// 62mph in 6.1 these are like what mid 6s
That's a random comment. My (now traded) '14 Mustang GT would eat yours alive (I've done a 4.6)... and a Hellcat would eat my Mustang alive... and a Tesla would eat the Hellcat alive... Not sure why you'd bring a Saab into this.
My old 95 aero hot estate 300 bhp boob tune would eat yours alive and your point is?
#noobtune
Don’t spin the tires
0.5s slowed shifng wtf ???new gear must 0.1s for good time
Granny shifting not double clutching like ya should
Do ya even understand what ya writing? Yes, may be he was here bit slow on shifts, but what on earth would do better double clutching when accelerating and going up shits? It`s an extra motion, so it has to be slower in result, and it`s usable only with hang rev system cars.
@@maciekapocaliptic ppl take jokes so sryls these days
Granny shifting.
Ford could have put a bit more effort into the design of those gauges. They're pretty bland.
true.. if you compare it to any german car from same era this dash seems 10 years older .. :(.. but honestly even the mondeo mk4 looks much better for me.
@@laszlovona Funny you said that. I was comparing that gauge cluster to my 2013 VW GTI.
0:48 gang rein leicht anfahren wie vorher. reinfenquietschen ist nicht besonders. weiss ja nicht ob du da zu schnell angefahren bist. war nicht dabei,. habe führerschein seit 2003 u fahre ford focus aber f. focus turnier kombi diesel
***** sehe ja nur das amarturenbrett. aber daher kann ich zwecks schaltung keine tipps geben... aber nie zu schnell gang rein u lolslegen.
Too much rev hang
That's the problem of the most of today's cars
test track too short to achieve 200 aka too slow lol
💀
≤))≥
_| \_ are u serious rn?
TR is better in my opinion
Slow mate..
Co. 220 bez mrugniecia okiem co tenn koleś jeździć nie umie
only milk and juice come in 2L . lol
SubSeven8948 soda
So slow
WTF !
Pshhh
geht nicht besser als mein 6er gti, schade. der ST ist so schön billig :D
Klar geht der besser. 360NM 250PS. Dein golf hab ich schon mit dem alten ST220 vernascht. Selbst der R32 hat dumm geguckt
Kann mich da nur anschließen, es ist nicht schwer mit dem 5 Zylinder n 6er stehn zu lassen vom 5er ganz zu schweigen.
Für n 7er ergab sich leider noch keine Gelegenheit. Beschleunige mal g n ST (kann aus Erfahrung nur für den 5 Zyl. reden) aus ner Baustelle heraus. Du wirst den Glauben verlieren :)
Und nur mal noch so am Rande, du vergleichst gerade 211 mit 250 PS :) (nur falls es dir noch nicht aufgefallen ist)
Dein kommentar verwirrt. Meinst du jetzt mit 211PS den GTI oder ST?
Ich hatte ja selbst den ST220, mir 226PS & 280NM und diesen perversen 6 zyl 3.0 sound. Aber dan bin ich 3 tage Focus ST gefahren. 250PS & 360NM, und jetzt hab ich ihn gekauft:D