It's been 6 years since this video came out and I still listen to it once or twice a year. Oh to play such a magnificent beast and to drown into modulations, splits, layers and seemingly unknown filter modes... Simply the most beautiful synth ever made !
Perhaps the best thing about the Oberheims is that each voice can be panned in stereo space, so when the voices are all in their own little corner and you play a chord......... well....... it'll bring a fawkin' tear to your eye!
@@danalexpiano it is just one more thing that makes this synth so special. We used a Matrix 6 for many years, mainly for silky pads and washes, and found a mint 12 later on in Berlin going for 1200€ and bought it immediately. Upon getting it back to London, we opened it up and found that it needed repairs and maintenance. Now, it sits pride of place in our studios. It gets used on a frequent basis. Love it.
A friend of mine back in late 90's started to buy all the analog synth people were literally dropping in the trash. He visited the studios and collected them, his mom was laughing, I thought he had some mental disease. Today, his collection may be the biggest and most expensive and all of them works. He has at least 6 Matrix 12 and several Xpanders, 11 Jupiter 8, he has a basement with all of them. All in working condition. He has one Mac 9600 with Protools and PCI cards all working. He started to sell the synths on eBay when he needs money, they are his retirement plan. He has well over 200 synths easily.
I feel the same way. I wish my OB6 could do all of it. I will keep trying to recreate some of the patches but honestly he should reissue this bad boy. Love it to death. Sexy ASF Synth.
Getting ready to start an online petition. 5000 initial signatures and we might get this somehow if he partners with the right investors. Dave just made the move with focusrite so I don’t know. I love the matrix and would pay good money for a solid reissue. One can dream I guess ..
I have all the vst stuff .. as someone who sits at a computer all day at work. I’d prefer the real hardware analog unit to touch and play, not click a mouse. I use mostly analog synths but. The vsts do have there place sometimes. I just rather use analog. Not an elitist just rather touch and use the real instrument. It’s way more Inspiring. Although vsts have come along way it’s just not the same. To each there own though. Gotta use what works best for you. Cheers 🍻
@@electrowayne2918 Hey, I totally get that. But the combination of hardware (Proteus 2000 that thinks it's an Orbit-3, Electribe MX, AN1x and EX5, together with an Arturia KeyLab 61 mk II and the V-Collection is rather nice. The KeyLab integrates well with the software, and the software doesn't break as soon as you look at it, as is often the case with gear that's over 40 years old. There's a Solina in there, and a Matrix-12, and a CS-80... all that kind of gear that you really, really don't want to have to maintain. Disclaimer: I'm still in the process of building it all together, and the AN1x and EX5 are still in a different part of the house.
This is an excellent demo of the legendary Matrix -12, possibly the best and most powerful analog synth of all time. I really love the evolving pad from 5:18. It's just so beautiful. It was my dream to own one back in 1987, and it's still my dream analog synth.........
You know how people talk about that Oberheim sound? It is hard to describe, but Obies just sound musical no matter what you're playing. They just have a quality, a dynamic, about their sound that sounds like a real full sounding instrument. Michel Doidic and Marcus Ryle really new what they were doing. The only other synth that reminds me of the Matrix 12 is the Rhodes Chroma. It is a beautiful machine that I hope to own one day the M12.
El mejor sintetizador de todos los tiempos, el sonido es excepcional. Probablemente, se uso para crear parte de la librería de sonidos del GENERAL MIDI.
Sumptuous sounds & synths lovers... Watch it ! Hat off & thanks for this awesome ... sounds travel throughout this great demo... Keep sharing these delights ! ;-))
Dear Classic Vintage… Love your channel!;) Is there any chance that you have the original factory patches for the Matrix-12? The battery died and I lost all my sounds, so it would be a great help;) Best Regards Henrik Knudsen
Hey man, great video. Would you happen to know where I could get a copy of the matrix 12 factory presets cassette or audio file? I also have a matrix 12 and want to do videos with it but I want to do it with the stock presets. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
I had an Xpander which I paid around 2K for when it came out. Then a year later I saw new Matrix 12's at Guitar Center for $1995. I was depressed at the cost but I should have realized it was an investment opportunity but then I was young and stupid...
Omg that patch at 16:48 is sooooo good. I would call it my synth spirit animal lol,. I going to have to try and recreate that with xp-30, esq1 and Morpheus
I’m new to subtractive synthesis and I have a hard time understanding the difference between the Matrix 12 and the Xpander. Does the 12 vs 6 voices mean that as long as I press down just 6 keys on the keyboard they sound the same? I’m about to get an Xpander possible, and when I listen to demos online I want to know if the Matrix 12 sound is the same as the Xpander: there are way less demos of the Xpander in comparison.
Yes, BUT if you have a long envelope (sustain, release, etc.) on a sound that ends up being 3 seconds long and you play 6 more notes after 2 seconds, the first 6 will cut out prematurely. Voice stealing.
what would complement a jupiter 8 better-this or an elka synthex-i already have tons of other synths nut i fancy another biggie-i make sort of experimental/techno/electronic songs
@@SacSynths_Jack_Z true,i think the question should really have been if you had a jupiter 8 which one would you buy to go along side it,and why? settled on a prophet5 in the end,v happy with it
@@joemcm1 IMO, I would pick the Matrix 12 over the Synthex (to compliment a JP-8). The synthex is one of my favorites of all time, but if you consider how much more advanced the M12 is (it came out almost ~5 years after JP-8). It has features that reflected the advancements of that time. For example, it has an extremely extensive mod matrix, many more filter types, 5 envelopes, 5 lfos, panning, patch per voice assignment, etc... My point is that the matrix 12 can go places the other 2 cant. So you'd be able to cover a wider sonic palette with the JP-8 & M12.
Эй, мэн! Ты молодец, что записываешь видео с легендарными синтезаторами! Ибо сейчес столько говна в мире звуков, что, очень редко услышышь хорошее звучание синтезаторов! Good gays!!!!!!!
The oberheim tvs pro does not come close, i personally found the TVS pro to be a bit of a disappointment on the sound-department personally, it does not have the same lush softness to the core sound in comparison to Oberheims like the Matrix 12, Ob-XA and OB-8, i think the TVS sounds a bit more like the OB-6, which is decent, but does not sound as good as their older counterparts.
Back in the late 80's when everybody was complaining about analogs not having a realistic piano sounds and musicians and stores were dumping their analog synths and grabbing samplers, i had a chance to grab one of these for under 1500 in a store i didn't. never stopped regretting or forgot that.second most stupid thing i ever did. the first being selling my like new Jupiter 8 with midi box that belonged to yes band for only 1200. the things we sometimes do....
Actually, it is the same as 2 Xpanders. The 6/1000 isn't supposed to be a "simpler" version of the 12. They share the same family name because said family of synthesizers is all about the mod matrix, but the Matrix-12 is a VCO monster related to the Xpander. That said, as the owner of an OB-Xa, I think there are enough good things in both synths to simply enjoy them for what they are.
You can do two things; assign an analogue sequencer to each voice for linked arpeggio - OR use a patchbay to synchronise the modulation and filters with another analog synth by feeding them both the same external VCO from either assigned as master. The latter stabilises drift, but in my opinion it hardly ever got used.. ..Unless you were Jean Michel Jarre. We never ever use(d) it. No need now with Cubase and Protools.
I understand that being a demo, the presentation required a dry sound. However, I would love to hear these sounds with some ambient reverb. Nothing extreme or fancy, just some reverb to let the sounds be heard in a more natural context, instead of as heard from an earphone plugged directly into the machine.
Not agree. Happy to hear some demos from real synth pros. You can add your reverb to any cheap synth and imagine you got something good. Only a real synth doesn’t need any processing. Btw, I own same upgraded m12, fantastic synth. And this demo represents its sound well. But you can download the video, extract audio and put into your daw with vst reverb anyway.
Andy Mcnab You can’t really compare a MiniMoog to a Matrix 12. They’re two different classes of synths. I would never choose the Matrix over a MiniMoog for synth bass sounds. You obviously can’t use the MiniMoog for pads unless you plan on overdubbing single notes. You can definitely have the argument over Prophets, Jupiters and the Matrix and no matter which you preferred, you wouldn’t be wrong.
The Prophet is more aggressive, and the JP-8 has a very broad range. But I agree that the Oberheims have that silky smooth filter that is just brilliant. I'd say they all sound great in their own way.
Nice sounds, but I dream to hear this wonderful instrument played by somebody who actually can play real music and not repeat two chords over and over...
Lot's of people get very exited on all those analog synths, where as the truth and reality is that we live in 2019 and VST's like Omnisphere II or Sylenth with high quality DAC's (I don't talk RME crap) simply sound waaay fatter and better than any analog. My first synth was an SH2000 back in those days...so I dare to state this. So please stop the myth. Wake up. The only value to an M12 and old analogs is the collectors value. It's the same like guitar freaks pretending old guitars sound better...sure. Musically ? First of all 97% of the majority listens to low quality compressed MP3. On top, and even in FLAC format, tests have proven that even skilled people can't tell in a final production whatever synth, analog or digital were used.
Hmm I have both analog synths like Juno-60 or Matrix6 and software synths like Omnisphere or Serum, and I also like the sound of these modern plugins, but I couldn´t find a sound that is like the Moog Sub37 for example, especially with all the parameters that you can tweak live to alter the sound. I mean listen to Stephan Bodzin for example, how could he do it with a plugin? Not possible, and I think it´s quite obvious also for normal listeners. Plus, there is also still a big group of people coming from a live music background, who need real intruments on stage. I play a Juno-60 live, and it was not possible to achieve a sound, reliability and haptic quality ike that with a MacBook on stage (which I did before), besides it just looks much nicer ;) Last but not least, people get inspired by these old machines that have a history, which is reflected in the way of playing again.
Personally I like the thiner sound. Being fat is all the rage today. To me the vintage stuff sounds pure. All depends on what you are going for. A lot of the music today is so clean and cinematic it bothers me
It's been 6 years since this video came out and I still listen to it once or twice a year.
Oh to play such a magnificent beast and to drown into modulations, splits, layers and seemingly unknown filter modes...
Simply the most beautiful synth ever made !
I am back again myself ...lol ! love the sound
I come back every few months also. What an incredible sound!
Perhaps the best thing about the Oberheims is that each voice can be panned in stereo space, so when the voices are all in their own little corner and you play a chord......... well....... it'll bring a fawkin' tear to your eye!
Adam Borseti I agree. And the extreme filter(s)!
So sad to hear for Tom Oberheim that his best synth invention is ability to pan voices... You really mean it?
Amen. :)
@@danalexpiano it is just one more thing that makes this synth so special. We used a Matrix 6 for many years, mainly for silky pads and washes, and found a mint 12 later on in Berlin going for 1200€ and bought it immediately. Upon getting it back to London, we opened it up and found that it needed repairs and maintenance. Now, it sits pride of place in our studios. It gets used on a frequent basis.
Love it.
@@RB747domme Can the Matrix 6 pan its voices as well? I haven't seen that function in mine yet.
A friend of mine back in late 90's started to buy all the analog synth people were literally dropping in the trash. He visited the studios and collected them, his mom was laughing, I thought he had some mental disease. Today, his collection may be the biggest and most expensive and all of them works. He has at least 6 Matrix 12 and several Xpanders, 11 Jupiter 8, he has a basement with all of them. All in working condition. He has one Mac 9600 with Protools and PCI cards all working. He started to sell the synths on eBay when he needs money, they are his retirement plan. He has well over 200 synths easily.
Damn, a little sad they mostly aren’t being played but a smart investment nevertheless.
Bullshit
What’s his email?
Dear Tom, just reissue this beauty at a reasonable price and the world can end
signed,
Everyone who loves synths
I feel the same way. I wish my OB6 could do all of it. I will keep trying to recreate some of the patches but honestly he should reissue this bad boy. Love it to death. Sexy ASF Synth.
Getting ready to start an online petition. 5000 initial signatures and we might get this somehow if he partners with the right investors. Dave just made the move with focusrite so I don’t know. I love the matrix and would pay good money for a solid reissue. One can dream I guess ..
You can always get the Arturia soft synth...
I have all the vst stuff .. as someone who sits at a computer all day at work. I’d prefer the real hardware analog unit to touch and play, not click a mouse. I use mostly analog synths but. The vsts do have there place sometimes. I just rather use analog. Not an elitist just rather touch and use the real instrument. It’s way more Inspiring. Although vsts have come along way it’s just not the same. To each there own though. Gotta use what works best for you. Cheers 🍻
@@electrowayne2918 Hey, I totally get that. But the combination of hardware (Proteus 2000 that thinks it's an Orbit-3, Electribe MX, AN1x and EX5, together with an Arturia KeyLab 61 mk II and the V-Collection is rather nice. The KeyLab integrates well with the software, and the software doesn't break as soon as you look at it, as is often the case with gear that's over 40 years old. There's a Solina in there, and a Matrix-12, and a CS-80... all that kind of gear that you really, really don't want to have to maintain.
Disclaimer: I'm still in the process of building it all together, and the AN1x and EX5 are still in a different part of the house.
Man, this synth sounds amazing! Great video!
Dammmm ! Those chords touch my soul brother.
first chords got me instantly, this synth sounds soooo beautiful
This is an excellent demo of the legendary Matrix -12, possibly the best and most powerful analog synth of all time. I really love the evolving pad from 5:18. It's just so beautiful. It was my dream to own one back in 1987, and it's still my dream analog synth.........
Power DX7 You can get a Matrix 6 for < 1000 USD on Reverb. It's half the voices, but still the same specs
Power DX7 You can also get a Futuresonus Parva
i had matrix 6r and wasn't satisfied, replaced it with xpander
lownrgy XPander is too expensive for me
but prices for matrix 6 has sky rocketed too..
Gorgeous sounds, well done!
It is a reference, much like your videos, sounds impressive program very well, thank you for comment ...
You know how people talk about that Oberheim sound? It is hard to describe, but Obies just sound musical no matter what you're playing. They just have a quality, a dynamic, about their sound that sounds like a real full sounding instrument. Michel Doidic and Marcus Ryle really new what they were doing. The only other synth that reminds me of the Matrix 12 is the Rhodes Chroma. It is a beautiful machine that I hope to own one day the M12.
Holy hell this thing sounds good.
Best synth ever!
Wow that MAtrix 12 looks like it just came out of the box!
Wow- your Matrix12 looks brand new! It's sad that more people do not keep them in good cosmetic condition. Thanks for the video. :)
I forgot how good this board sounded...damn
Om 🎉grande saund la migliore 🎉😮
15:40
Obviously used by Jens Johansson for leads on Malmsteen's Trial by Fire. Very cutting edgy rock sound ;)
Man, that thing looks right out of the box new!
El mejor sintetizador de todos los tiempos, el sonido es excepcional. Probablemente, se uso para crear parte de la librería de sonidos del GENERAL MIDI.
At 0:00, Matrix 12 (1985-1988).
i love it
yo, now i understand why 80’s sounded so big
At 2:40 sounds like the lead sound from Black Celebration by Depeche Mode. Awesome.
Sumptuous sounds & synths lovers... Watch it !
Hat off & thanks for this awesome ... sounds travel throughout this great demo...
Keep sharing these delights ! ;-))
Would you mind sharing the sysex with me. I have that beast to. might already have the patches. not sure. Would like to play with em though. Thanks
One of the rare things that have beauty in- and outside.
Dear Classic Vintage…
Love your channel!;)
Is there any chance that you have the original factory patches for the Matrix-12?
The battery died and I lost all my sounds, so it would be a great help;)
Best Regards
Henrik Knudsen
I think that this is the synth used by Jerry Goldsmith on Rambo 2's soundtrack
who knows gerry as gone!!u can download some sheet on 4share!!
12 mono side.outs, never seen...cool... one little mixer filled.
You know what you got, when you have a Matrix12!
matrix 12, synthesizer its great , modulation can take you to endless possibilities of sounds ...
CLASSIC VINTAGE And that/those filter/s. It freaks me out every time how incredible it is. 😮
Hello, the first pad from 0:00 - is that a preset, or your sound? It’s just great.
How did all those animals fit on that during the flood? What a beast!
Hey man, great video. Would you happen to know where I could get a copy of the matrix 12 factory presets cassette or audio file? I also have a matrix 12 and want to do videos with it but I want to do it with the stock presets. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
I got to get this man
I had an Xpander which I paid around 2K for when it came out. Then a year later I saw new Matrix 12's at Guitar Center for $1995. I was depressed at the cost but I should have realized it was an investment opportunity but then I was young and stupid...
What’s the sound called that your using at 11:40?
Cây đàn tuyệt quá , âm thanh như là Waldorf Quantum ..vậy , ước gì ...
Physically, what’s bigger - this, or a DX1?
DX1 Hands down. Size and weight. It's much larger.
Omg that patch at 16:48 is sooooo good. I would call it my synth spirit animal lol,. I going to have to try and recreate that with xp-30, esq1 and Morpheus
I’m new to subtractive synthesis and I have a hard time understanding the difference between the Matrix 12 and the Xpander. Does the 12 vs 6 voices mean that as long as I press down just 6 keys on the keyboard they sound the same? I’m about to get an Xpander possible, and when I listen to demos online I want to know if the Matrix 12 sound is the same as the Xpander: there are way less demos of the Xpander in comparison.
That would be correct. The Xpander shares the same architecture as the Matrix-12, but with 6 voices instead of 12.
Yes, BUT if you have a long envelope (sustain, release, etc.) on a sound that ends up being 3 seconds long and you play 6 more notes after 2 seconds, the first 6 will cut out prematurely. Voice stealing.
This, a Prophet VS, and a Yamaha DX-1 - and you could brick me in in my studio.
The squelch!!!
Awesome demo! We're all the layered sounds done with actual layering, or was that achieved via the Matrix' virtual patch system?
nice just the way i like it :)
I Would Love The Own This..But The Price 🥴
Not bad. The sounds a little cheezy thou 🤔😋
10:20
epic
what would complement a jupiter 8 better-this or an elka synthex-i already have tons of other synths nut i fancy another biggie-i make sort of experimental/techno/electronic songs
You shouldn't buy another if you can't answer this for yourself.
@@SacSynths_Jack_Z true,i think the question should really have been if you had a jupiter 8 which one would you buy to go along side it,and why? settled on a prophet5 in the end,v happy with it
@@joemcm1 IMO, I would pick the Matrix 12 over the Synthex (to compliment a JP-8). The synthex is one of my favorites of all time, but if you consider how much more advanced the M12 is (it came out almost ~5 years after JP-8). It has features that reflected the advancements of that time. For example, it has an extremely extensive mod matrix, many more filter types, 5 envelopes, 5 lfos, panning, patch per voice assignment, etc... My point is that the matrix 12 can go places the other 2 cant. So you'd be able to cover a wider sonic palette with the JP-8 & M12.
Эй, мэн! Ты молодец, что записываешь видео с легендарными синтезаторами! Ибо сейчес столько говна в мире звуков, что, очень редко услышышь хорошее звучание синтезаторов!
Good gays!!!!!!!
Lovely deep bass end on this demo - thanks. This sounds rather like the OB6, albeit without all that matrix modulation of course..
Tom Oberheim's newish TVS PRO is phatter IMO. But it can't do pads and strings like this one!
The oberheim tvs pro does not come close, i personally found the TVS pro to be a bit of a disappointment on the sound-department personally, it does not have the same lush softness to the core sound in comparison to Oberheims like the Matrix 12, Ob-XA and OB-8, i think the TVS sounds a bit more like the OB-6, which is decent, but does not sound as good as their older counterparts.
Thomas Emil Hansen OB6 nails it
Snuppeluppen Synth channel lol. The TVS & OB6 are SEM based, therefor truer to the classic OB tone. The others you mentioned are CURTIS based.
@@snuppssynthchannel agreed
Anyone else loosing it? Analogue heaven
WHY THE FUCK DID THEY STOP MAKING THESE?????!!!!!
One of the best synths, I like it better than the OB-XA. We had one in the building but somebody stole it 5 years ago, sadly.
SORRY MOOG:(
Back in the late 80's when everybody was complaining about analogs not having a realistic piano sounds and musicians and stores were dumping their analog synths and grabbing samplers, i had a chance to grab one of these for under 1500 in a store i didn't. never stopped regretting or forgot that.second most stupid thing i ever did. the first being selling my like new Jupiter 8 with midi box that belonged to yes band for only 1200. the things we sometimes do....
U passed on these synths in favor of piano sounds & romplers???
big difference with the OBXa or even the OB8 . it lacks the extremely raw grainy sound of the OBXa.
same than 2 matrix6/1000 for the sound....
Well, that would be nice and I'd just buy a second Matrix-6 then.. ;) but Matrix-12 has VCOs, unlike the Matrix-6s DCOs.
Actually, it is the same as 2 Xpanders. The 6/1000 isn't supposed to be a "simpler" version of the 12. They share the same family name because said family of synthesizers is all about the mod matrix, but the Matrix-12 is a VCO monster related to the Xpander.
That said, as the owner of an OB-Xa, I think there are enough good things in both synths to simply enjoy them for what they are.
Philippe Zsiga OBX is the one to get. SEM based like the OB6.
whats with all the outputs
On the side? I think those are either separate CV inputs or separate audio outputs for each of the 12 voices.
You can do two things; assign an analogue sequencer to each voice for linked arpeggio - OR use a patchbay to synchronise the modulation and filters with another analog synth by feeding them both the same external VCO from either assigned as master.
The latter stabilises drift, but in my opinion it hardly ever got used..
..Unless you were Jean Michel Jarre.
We never ever use(d) it. No need now with Cubase and Protools.
Is this a refurbished and/ or upgraded Oberheim?
Te envidio. :'c
@10:45 cry
So purty.
I understand that being a demo, the presentation required a dry sound. However, I would love to hear these sounds with some ambient reverb. Nothing extreme or fancy, just some reverb to let the sounds be heard in a more natural context, instead of as heard from an earphone plugged directly into the machine.
maybe a strymon big sky? I bet no one has thought of using a strymon big sky with a synth.
Check out this guy: ua-cam.com/video/uA7wbBQIe70/v-deo.html
Not agree. Happy to hear some demos from real synth pros. You can add your reverb to any cheap synth and imagine you got something good. Only a real synth doesn’t need any processing. Btw, I own same upgraded m12, fantastic synth. And this demo represents its sound well.
But you can download the video, extract audio and put into your daw with vst reverb anyway.
Orio Menoni no
@@danalexpiano do you ever use the 12 ports on the side? We have never felt the need to do anything that required them. I know JMJ did on stage.
This synth make Minimoog, Jupiter and Prophet sound bad : - )
Andy Mcnab You can’t really compare a MiniMoog to a Matrix 12. They’re two different classes of synths. I would never choose the Matrix over a MiniMoog for synth bass sounds. You obviously can’t use the MiniMoog for pads unless you plan on overdubbing single notes. You can definitely have the argument over Prophets, Jupiters and the Matrix and no matter which you preferred, you wouldn’t be wrong.
The Prophet is more aggressive, and the JP-8 has a very broad range. But I agree that the Oberheims have that silky smooth filter that is just brilliant. I'd say they all sound great in their own way.
Andy Mcnab are u insane???
Andy Mcnab Minimoog is a mono synth.
Thomas Emil Hansen the rev 3 prophet has the same osc & filter chips, yet sounds far fatter and has faster envelopes.
Curtis based, not SEM based.
it's seems to only emulate brass sounds
Huuuge sound!
Nice sounds, but I dream to hear this wonderful instrument played by somebody who actually can play real music and not repeat two chords over and over...
Cheesy sounds.
Lot's of people get very exited on all those analog synths, where as the truth and reality is that we live in 2019 and VST's like Omnisphere II or Sylenth with high quality DAC's (I don't talk RME crap) simply sound waaay fatter and better than any analog. My first synth was an SH2000 back in those days...so I dare to state this. So please stop the myth. Wake up. The only value to an M12 and old analogs is the collectors value. It's the same like guitar freaks pretending old guitars sound better...sure. Musically ? First of all 97% of the majority listens to low quality compressed MP3. On top, and even in FLAC format, tests have proven that even skilled people can't tell in a final production whatever synth, analog or digital were used.
Hmm I have both analog synths like Juno-60 or Matrix6 and software synths like Omnisphere or Serum, and I also like the sound of these modern plugins, but I couldn´t find a sound that is like the Moog Sub37 for example, especially with all the parameters that you can tweak live to alter the sound. I mean listen to Stephan Bodzin for example, how could he do it with a plugin? Not possible, and I think it´s quite obvious also for normal listeners. Plus, there is also still a big group of people coming from a live music background, who need real intruments on stage. I play a Juno-60 live, and it was not possible to achieve a sound, reliability and haptic quality ike that with a MacBook on stage (which I did before), besides it just looks much nicer ;)
Last but not least, people get inspired by these old machines that have a history, which is reflected in the way of playing again.
sK3LeTvM VST’s last about 6 years.
Personally I like the thiner sound. Being fat is all the rage today. To me the vintage stuff sounds pure. All depends on what you are going for. A lot of the music today is so clean and cinematic it bothers me
Perfect time make an appointment to see a doctor about the hearing problem you are having.
You are trippin'. Plus Omnisphere is a $500 freaking plug in.
Not a synth for me... Sounds flat and boring 💤