I beg to differ. These visuals give us a glimpse of an otherwise invisible slice of true unwavering reality that we cannot perceive. Enough iterations of a more advanced 4D software, and shifting it to a specific slice which we are perceiving now.
In my novel, Above Dark Waters, fractals play a main point at the very end. One character basically has an NDE and the 'other world' is massive and infinite like a fractal. I also imagine a Mandelbox like you visualize at 2:21
The fractals are truly 4D. Here we are showing their intersection with 4D sphere. In the demo you can shift the radius of the 4D sphere to see different slices of the fractals. In the video all shots were taken at constant radius of the 4D sphere.
@@tucan7112 wasn't meaning to sound accusatory, was just confused. Since we cannot interact with any more than 3 dimensions everyone making visual representations seems to interpret more dimensions differently. Was cool to watch.
This is not a 4d sphere. This is a 3d sphere. An ant walking on a circle (the boundary; not inside the disk) can't tell the difference between that vs. walking on a line, which is why the circle should properly be called 1d. The fact that one might draw it in 2d doesn't make it 2d. If I draw a point in the plane it's a 0d object, despite sitting in the plane.
Nope, here we are walking on a 4D sphere, same as if you said you're walking on sphere. You would mean 3D sphere not a ring. If you want to talk surfaces then its [S2 or 2-sphere] for 3D sphere and for 4D sphere its [S3 or 3-sphere].
I beg to differ. These visuals give us a glimpse of an otherwise invisible slice of true unwavering reality that we cannot perceive. Enough iterations of a more advanced 4D software, and shifting it to a specific slice which we are perceiving now.
"unlike humans their lack of purpose is Very obvious" frickin legend hahaha
underrated channel
Yes! Thanks for bringing it to my attention!
Your channel is one of the coolest recent yt discoveries
I'm used to the absolute insanity of the videos you make, an existentialist poem is certainly unexpected.
As always, awesome visualisations!
I've been reading oyasumi punpun.
In my novel, Above Dark Waters, fractals play a main point at the very end. One character basically has an NDE and the 'other world' is massive and infinite like a fractal. I also imagine a Mandelbox like you visualize at 2:21
wow at 1:03 you can hear him actually getting comfortable with the void around him!
sounded like he fell into it and hit the floor
@@CiruPlays "Let's get comfortable, guys"
*Crash! Thud!*
The first thing that come to mind is 4D Marble Marcher
I hope I would see this in my dreams
Most based take on fractals
they have significance in future for voxel worlds probs i wanted to build an Minecraft city in one first time I saw these things!
1:02 TVTropes:DiedDuringProduction
cool
are these not just 3 dimensional spaces? how is this 4 dimensional?
The fractals are truly 4D. Here we are showing their intersection with 4D sphere.
In the demo you can shift the radius of the 4D sphere to see different slices of the fractals.
In the video all shots were taken at constant radius of the 4D sphere.
@@tucan7112 wasn't meaning to sound accusatory, was just confused. Since we cannot interact with any more than 3 dimensions everyone making visual representations seems to interpret more dimensions differently. Was cool to watch.
ARE YOU MARK?
WHO IS MARK?
calm down there i barely understand 2d fractals 😭
This is not a 4d sphere. This is a 3d sphere.
An ant walking on a circle (the boundary; not inside the disk) can't tell the difference between that vs. walking on a line, which is why the circle should properly be called 1d. The fact that one might draw it in 2d doesn't make it 2d. If I draw a point in the plane it's a 0d object, despite sitting in the plane.
Nope, here we are walking on a 4D sphere, same as if you said you're walking on sphere. You would mean 3D sphere not a ring.
If you want to talk surfaces then its [S2 or 2-sphere] for 3D sphere and for 4D sphere its [S3 or 3-sphere].
Semantics. A point on a line, plane, etc is a 1D, 2D, etc object. Because that's the size of vector you need to define it.
He's telling about fractals but can't edit an audio properly
And the video is not smooth at all
cringebased