The only reason im pretty sure they actually went is that there are chinese lunar satellites that have taken pictures of the apollo landing sites and i just dont see a world where china covers for america
do people not realize that the flag had a second pole running diagonally across the top to keep it up? that’s why it’s movement wasn’t like normal flags
@@kc72186 Why would there be lunar dust blowing around if there is no atmosphere blowing wind? What or who made you expect the rover to be covered in dust? If there is no one disturbing soil, there won't be dust covering it. Zero explanation will clear this up, because you're not capable of believing any explanation. It's the same thing with flat earth people. You can give them all the evidence in the world, and they still won't believe. There is always some super complex counterargument they'll post-hoc rationalize.
6:04 as smart as this fellow may be that’s not how probability works. You don’t add them together. Every 12 hours you have a 50% chance. In three 12 hour sessions you still have a 50% chance three times.
@@kc72186 Did you see when those first astronauts were asked about the radiation belt(s) and they had no fkn idea what it was, after the journalist schooled them on it, they displayed a bizare quality, THEY stopped him and repeated to him what he JUST told them! Absolutely mind numbing behavior from ALL of them mind you, individually. It's a fkn eye-opener indeed.
Because what's the point? The same people would still claim today's broadcast was fake. You can show flat-earthers real modern proof of a round earth, and they'll STILL believe it's flat. No evidence can convince them. Any evidence shown will just have them believe you're in on the whole thing. You're part of the conspiracy. In an age of AI image generation, and even video now, you think anyone will believe we been to the moon if it happened yesterday? Also, why spend that money? What's the point to spend hundreds of millions, or even billions to get there again? They actually are planning another mission, but even that will be "debunked". 2026 will be the next actual landing, and people will claim it was AI generated. Calling it now.
This isn't dumb just plain stupid, this Guy was laughed off the bad astronomy website by 9/11Conspiracy Theorists who showed him his math and science were wrong. He was Litterally debunked by 9/11No Brainers.
They could have had a unmanned mission… I’m not saying they did, but it is possible, cause moon rocks have been brought back. I’m leaning that they are just lying about the technology they used to get there. But that’s just my opinion and I know nothing!
You know Jamie low key gets frustrated and shitty as hell with Joe but dude must have the patience of a monk.😂 I'd just love to hear the shit he thinks to himself and mumbles under his breath...I'm sure there are a lot of "mmhhmmm go fuck yourself" moments in young Jamies head😅
And… I remember being told the the LEM was so thin that if the AssTroNots dropped a wrench or tool, that it would penetrate the LEM skin. And, get this: They pressurized this vehicle? BS.
The supposedly greatest achievement completed by the human race and they destroyed all the footage, Schematics of the rocket,lander and how they got there and back on the amount of fuel they used. NASA even come out and said footage was recorded over because of expense reasons and because of how much the kodak films cost back in the day......Are you kidding me? They had pretty much had unlimited budgets back in the day,especially to cover the cost of the film tape and of it being of historical importance I'm sure,That's as almost analogous as saying they re-used out and wrote over the United States Declaration of Independence to save on paper......Its utter Bullshit and the majority of people know it as well.😂
Once you accelerate in space you maintain that velocity indefinitely. If you throw a baseball in space to 50 miles an hour, it'll hit Jupiter if you aim it well, and motion predict the planets. No atmosphere to slow it down. All you need is fuel to takeoff, and leave earths gravitational field. Fuel needed to leave the Moon isn't much. Gravity is weak as hell. No air friction to fight either. Not sure why schematics were destroyed, but it might be for security reasons. Why let the Soviet Union do it? But I think you know that. Why do you need the schematics? You wan to build a rocket at home?
@@eugkra33They used a slingshot effect taking advantage of earth's Gravity, the Russians figured out they couldn't go to the moon because they didn't have the computer technology, to make the Course Corrections so they abandoned the project. It's called rocket science you use gravity not Fuel to get you there faster.
One big problem! you can see all the junk that was left on the moon's surface. so how did all the junk which we see in these videos get there? it has been seen by multiple satellites and you can see all the junk they left behind! is everybody saying that the 6 Missions to the moon were all faked then how the heel did all that junk get up there.
It could actually be because of the air vents on the suits, which are on the front and they blow any exhaust air in 4 directions: up;down;left;right (so the force is balanced and it doesnt act like a thruster)
Neil Armstrong,Buz Aldren etc get all the plaudits but, I beg every man woman and child to never forget the sacrifice Bruce Willis made for humanity and his selfless bravery so we could be here today!MY HERO!
One problem is something called the Van Allen radiation belt once you get past a little past the space station international there's a very potent radiation belt all the equipment have to be led shielded most likely a lot of stuff would have to be shielded think about it ..
Steel-man for the flag moving. Electro-static energy might be the reason. There is no atmosphere, so no humidity. Pretty sure the astronaut would covered in some lunar dust. Like attracts like. When he walked by the planted flag, a charge traveling up the flag pole would be drawn towards him and when the attraction was broken the flag pole wobbled causing the appearance of the flag blowing in a breeze. Maybe. I don't know. This makes sense to me.
If you could film it with a "little model going up". Then you can automatically film the real thing. The LRO and russia and china have all seen and admitted to the landings. Its more ridiculous to fake it at this point. Just because one mission across the sea barely made it in a small craft doesnt mean future voyages didnt wait until they had advanced with bigger and better ships. Yes, someone technically "can" sail around the world in a solo sail boat, but its not advisable... Just because we did it once 60 years ago doesnt mean that stuff was proof positive 100pct safe and the way to continue. We were lucky we had the success rate we did.
What don’t we have a colony on the moon? Why haven’t we been back? Why can’t we get STELLAR footage? Something is going on clearly who’s to say the extent.
Why do we care? I should be learning how to evade paying so much taxes right now. Not watching an old argument about if we went to the stupid moon. So what if we didn’t go. Then what? Does the world change? No.
These broadcasts were shown in "real time" - there was no thought about how these images could be analyzed in future years by digital technology... or even such simple tech as VHS tech...
@@djuro14 It's called the solar wind, they can actually use it to propel space craft away from the sun. Charge particles will bounce off the aluminum foil in the space suit and hit the Flag, the crazy conspiracy theorist was told this back in 2006, he knows why the flag moves, but he can't sell books to idiots unless he can convince them the astronauts are in air.
Being there in a vacuum, how are there wrinkles in their space suits? We should be able to measure how much the walls of that thin ship bowed in the vacuum of space with just pictures. How did people live in a ship only pressurized to 4psi for so long? Could we prove by just measuring shadows and figuring out the exact angle of the sun?
Yeah why don’t we just give all our agency to a government controlled robot. We don’t need to verify anything ourselves the robot will do that for us. I hope the meteorite comes soon.
Quick question? Is it a possibility that the astronaut space suit was blowing air out of the backpack/suit? As he walked by the AIR blew out of the suit and onto the wired flag? Legit question
@sardonicspartan9343 lol. I think that the burden of proof would lie more on you do prove we have. We can't even zoom in on the supposed flag on the moon from Earth. There is not a telescope powerful enough to do that....anywhere. But somehow we can see Jupiter's storms, Neptune, Pluto....stars and galaxies way beyond even Pluto??? We can send these supposed rovers to drive all over Mars that send pictures back to Earth...but we can't see the flag on our own moon? Why has there never been a single photo taken of Earth from space? Everything out there is AI generated or so close that you can see the land and oceans of Earth. Nothing online that shows the entirety of Earth from any distance whatsoever. It's all relatively close up photos and video. There is so much that doesn't add up its not even funny. There are bubbles in more than half the video footage inside and outside of the ISS and the shuttles while in space. Like you get from filming in the pool that we have for "training" the astronauts to go to the ISS. I could go on and on. Why is there a mouse running around freely on the engine rocket booster that was supposedly a live feed that had already made it unto space beyond the stratosphere??? This is all online for you to look at yourself. Hell, Jared Leto owns the home that was at one time a bunker/film studio that Stanley Kubrick used to film a lot of the shit we were shown back in the day. Admittedly so! This isn't just conspiracy garbage...it's real life lies we've been told! Regardless my advice to you is to find Jesus Christ if you haven't already. He's the way and the only way. Love ya friend. Take care. 👍
@@sardonicspartan9343isn’t strange how Elon, Bezos, and NASA currently cannot make it out of earths orbit. The moon is 384 km away! And till this day not a single recent photo of the flag can be found.
@@sardonicspartan9343Ok, but why are you so heated about this topic… I genuinely am curious as to why you feel the need to scroll to every comment that “suspects” it’s been falsely reported that we went. Are you a scholar that is knowledge in the subject? You’ve been commenting too damn much 💀😂 I could give 0 fs bout this as whole as I’m just a Joe fan. Do you care to elaborate proof that we went?! I’d love to get more knowledgeable in the subject as whole!
FFS. If you think they didn't go to the moon, watch the lunar rover from Apollo 15, 16 and 17. See how the dust flies up in a much larger parabola than here on earth. Also, who left the mirrors on the moon that astronomers to this day bounce lasers off to measure the distance from the earth? That was done by Apollo 11.
The astronauts walking past the flag are objects with mass. Is it not possible that they could be dragging small particles of moon dust in their walk that “blows” up against the flag causing it to move? In an atmosphere free environment with no gravity it wouldn’t take much moon debris to cause the flags to move.
The direct feed from the moon had to go through Australia before Houston. A woman who worked at the Australian facility swore that she saw a Coca Cola bottle on the ground near the lunar lander. I kid you not.
Direct feed or not, it's still not in real time when the signal reaches anywhere on earth from the moon...do you have any idea how long a signal would take to transmit between the moon and earth? It's certainly more than seconds or minutes! That right there should certainly make one question the validity of the theory.
@@philbuell6657 : z what? lol. Clearly you have no idea about radio or physics. Radio waves travel at the speed of light. Fact. Thus the time delay one way from the moon to the earth is roughy 1.3 seconds. I have no idea where you got your information.
I have seen the stuff on the moon with my own telescope and at the observatory. How did it get there? How are they planting that in my personal telescope? This is right there with flat earth nonsense.
My favorite video of this guy is where Buzz Aldrin punched him in the mouth. "Witnesses came forward to the police indicating that "Sibrel had aggressively poked Mr Aldrin with the Bible". When Aldrin refused Sibrel's request, Sibrel followed him, saying: "You're the one who said you walked on the Moon when you didn't." The BBC reported that "Deputy District Attorney Elizabeth Ratinoff told Reuters...videotape shot by a cameraman hired by Mr Sibrel had shown the film-maker follow Mr Aldrin, calling him a 'thief, liar and coward'." Still being recorded by Sibrel's camera crew, Aldrin responded with "Will you get away from me?" and then punched Sibrel in the jaw."
NASA keep having to delay proposed manned moon landings. Because of the spacecrafts' "very real development challenges", according to NASA administrator Bill Nelson. For instance: The construction of and delivery of fuel to a proposed orbital gas station that, according to NASA, is necessary for a trip to the moon in this day and age. In 2024 the scheduled Artemis mission was delayed due to spacesuit development issues. Seemed a lot simpler in 1969 - with a fraction of the technology we have nowadays!
@@djuro14 NASA, SpaceX and Eon Musk himself have stated that Artemis 3 - which proposes to land a crew on the lunar surface - will need to implement refueling in low earth orbit.
@@djuro14 Just out of interest: What's your opinion on the timescale NASA have given to construct and send the fuel depot into LEO? At the same time, building, testing and launching the spacecraft (APS-R) that will cargo the propellant from the depot to Artemis 3? Obviously - before all that - Artemis 2 technical delays need to be tested and approved - for instance, the spacesuits, Space X Starship lander among other problematic difficulties. And - goes without saying - Artemis 2 mission needs to be successfully accomplished. Never mind that NASA and Space X can't agree on the amount of hydrazine propellant needed to fuel the Artemis 3 mission! This all before Artemis 3 actually takes off from earth. NASA project an Artemis 3 mission launch date of September 2026. Realistic? Or optimistic?
The television standard used for sending video from space was not NTSC, the standard in America up until recently. It was fewer lines and a slower frame rate. There was no way to convert standards back then other that by pointing a camera at a monitor.
Okay we astablished that no one went to the moon... the real question is WHY would they go through all that trouble? What were they trying to accomplish?
How come they could talk on walkie talkies from the moon to earth in the 60’s but my cell phone won’t work in my damn back yard in 2024? Lol 😂
You must have an iphone
@@sardonicspartan9343 Lol you guessed it!
@@sardonicspartan9343 fuckin Android people are so cringe
It’s because they had an entire network dedicated to moon to earth communication. Whereas phones have millions of customers sharing a network.
I live 300 metres from a cell phone tower, but we have no mobile phone coverage inside our house!
I'm starting to wonder if anything since Kennedy is what they say it was.
Since the Titanic...
Since Michael Jackson was black
Since the founding of the CIA, nothing is real.
Since men started having babies
Since the Bible. 🐉
The only reason im pretty sure they actually went is that there are chinese lunar satellites that have taken pictures of the apollo landing sites and i just dont see a world where china covers for america
Both the Chinese and Russian admit we went.
Absolutely 💯 Thank you. Finally someone with some sence
Please show us these communist Chinese photos.
Do you mean the CCP?
Alex Jones said we went there, but they faked the part you see on tv.
I have a feeling Joe verbally abuses Jamie off the set
He's pretty shitty to jamie right?
I thought the same lol
Sometimes by the way jamie talks and his voice sounds i get an "ex addict" vibe from him
I have a feeling that your buttocks are very tight.
Y’all are too extra. Jamie is good.
do people not realize that the flag had a second pole running diagonally across the top to keep it up? that’s why it’s movement wasn’t like normal flags
That information has been out there for decade. These people don't want it to be true.
Makes sense
Why wasn't the lunar lander covered in dust and how did the astronauts survive in those flimsy suits.
Zero explanations will clear this up.
@@kc72186 Google it.
@@kc72186 Why would there be lunar dust blowing around if there is no atmosphere blowing wind? What or who made you expect the rover to be covered in dust? If there is no one disturbing soil, there won't be dust covering it. Zero explanation will clear this up, because you're not capable of believing any explanation. It's the same thing with flat earth people. You can give them all the evidence in the world, and they still won't believe. There is always some super complex counterargument they'll post-hoc rationalize.
6:04 as smart as this fellow may be that’s not how probability works. You don’t add them together. Every 12 hours you have a 50% chance. In three 12 hour sessions you still have a 50% chance three times.
It's not 150% but it's higher than 50%, it's about an 87% chance of a deadly error occuring.
Exactly. Otherwise Roulette would be an easy game to win.
This dude isn't qualified to talk about anything.
How come we haven’t gone back and televised it with all the better technology we have today?
Oh theres not enough money to go..
Oh theres no interest in it
Oh their full of shit
Because they haven't figured out how to protect the astronauts from pebble sized meteors.
@@kc72186 They cant protect pilots from being shot down. Are those flights fake?
@@kc72186 Did you see when those first astronauts were asked about the radiation belt(s) and they had no fkn idea what it was, after the journalist schooled them on it, they displayed a bizare quality, THEY stopped him and repeated to him what he JUST told them! Absolutely mind numbing behavior from ALL of them mind you, individually. It's a fkn eye-opener indeed.
Because what's the point? The same people would still claim today's broadcast was fake. You can show flat-earthers real modern proof of a round earth, and they'll STILL believe it's flat. No evidence can convince them. Any evidence shown will just have them believe you're in on the whole thing. You're part of the conspiracy.
In an age of AI image generation, and even video now, you think anyone will believe we been to the moon if it happened yesterday? Also, why spend that money? What's the point to spend hundreds of millions, or even billions to get there again? They actually are planning another mission, but even that will be "debunked". 2026 will be the next actual landing, and people will claim it was AI generated. Calling it now.
Dude, bouncing by the flag... planted in moondust (in 1/5 gravity) is going to cause a "wobble" in the flagpole.
EVERYTHING is FAKE!!! We been LIED to all our LIVES!!! 😂
This video is a lie
@@softjones3128 NASA = FAKE NEWS!!!! 😂
Jews are real
I mean the flag has momentum still from him planting it
You'll believe anything.
@@rickmorgan9715momentum is pretty well documented bud. Lol
@@rickmorgan9715 Watch the footage of the lunar rovers and tell me that's on earth. It just isn't.
No one has ever left the atmosphere. Never!
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough.
Joe Rogan -"ok!"
This isn't dumb just plain stupid, this Guy was laughed off the bad astronomy website by 9/11Conspiracy Theorists who showed him his math and science were wrong. He was Litterally debunked by 9/11No Brainers.
This guy is the perfect example of the Dunning Kruger effect.
To Smart to realize how dumb he is.
@@carrollsanders9376 : Did you mean to use the word "too"? FFS.
@@kitcanyon658 I don’t know what work too means, FFS.
Funny how they took off from the moon and came back to earth on the first attempt
Funny how the Wright brothers lived after the first flight. Or those guys that first went to the Mariana trench.
Wrong there were 10 missions prior to Apollo 11. that's why the number was 11. duh. lmao 🙂
Lmao!!! yeah, I’m sure the Soviet union who is tracking us would say nothing if we didn’t land on the moon, stop it already
I do agree. If we didn't go, why would an enemy of USA help keep an American secret. You are right. Stop it already.
why? they didn't land on it either
They could have had a unmanned mission… I’m not saying they did, but it is possible, cause moon rocks have been brought back. I’m leaning that they are just lying about the technology they used to get there. But that’s just my opinion and I know nothing!
No way they landed on moon.
The Bank of Moscow was part of the private central bank cartel from.1919 to 1990.
You know Jamie low key gets frustrated and shitty as hell with Joe but dude must have the patience of a monk.😂
I'd just love to hear the shit he thinks to himself and mumbles under his breath...I'm sure there are a lot of "mmhhmmm go fuck yourself" moments in young Jamies head😅
I SEE ZERO MOVEMENT OF THE FLAG AS MAN WALKS PAST IT....AM I GOING BLIND?
WHO is taking the video of them putting in the ground??
I've always wondered that myself.
And… I remember being told the the LEM was so thin that if the AssTroNots dropped a wrench or tool, that it would penetrate the LEM skin. And, get this: They pressurized this vehicle? BS.
I remember being told lots of BS.
Where are the rests of these videos???😢
3:25 - Joe has Jamie fighting for his life 🤣🤣🤣🤣
AIR CONDONTIONING IN THE BACKPACKS LMFAOOOO
How they have deceived the people is truly cruel.👽🛸
this is the joe rogan i like
If man actually went to the moon in the 60's.....there would be fast food restaurants there today....
'no Jamie, back!!!' 🤣😂
full interview ?
Jesus joe grills jamie like hes his son when he doesnt do as hes told
@5:48 if there is a 50% chance of something happening everyday, that doesn't equate to 150% in three days.
Jamie should get workman’s compensation
Never thought about why they didn't use color footage. Even if the feed needed to be B&W there's absolutely no reason why not have color video later.
Is this an old podcast?
A body in motion remains in motion.
The supposedly greatest achievement completed by the human race and they destroyed all the footage, Schematics of the rocket,lander and how they got there and back on the amount of fuel they used.
NASA even come out and said footage was recorded over because of expense reasons and because of how much the kodak films cost back in the day......Are you kidding me? They had pretty much had unlimited budgets back in the day,especially to cover the cost of the film tape and of it being of historical importance I'm sure,That's as almost analogous as saying they re-used out and wrote over the United States Declaration of Independence to save on paper......Its utter Bullshit and the majority of people know it as well.😂
Those photos weren't destroyed that's what they tell the public.
Once you accelerate in space you maintain that velocity indefinitely. If you throw a baseball in space to 50 miles an hour, it'll hit Jupiter if you aim it well, and motion predict the planets. No atmosphere to slow it down. All you need is fuel to takeoff, and leave earths gravitational field. Fuel needed to leave the Moon isn't much. Gravity is weak as hell. No air friction to fight either. Not sure why schematics were destroyed, but it might be for security reasons. Why let the Soviet Union do it? But I think you know that. Why do you need the schematics? You wan to build a rocket at home?
@@eugkra33They used a slingshot effect taking advantage of earth's Gravity, the Russians figured out they couldn't go to the moon because they didn't have the computer technology, to make the Course Corrections so they abandoned the project. It's called rocket science you use gravity not Fuel to get you there faster.
We are not alone just deal with it😮😮😮
They never show the rover footage from later missions for some reason when trying to say it was fake…
"If Gilligan's Island was filmed in color why weren't the moon landings?"...A few moments later...3:00 Lol this guy.
He brushed it with his shoulder
I’m shocked there isn’t a context warning on this …. Yt slacking on their misinformation campaign lol
If you’re gonna fake it you don’t do it SIX TIMES
One big problem! you can see all the junk that was left on the moon's surface. so how did all the junk which we see in these videos get there? it has been seen by multiple satellites and you can see all the junk they left behind! is everybody saying that the 6 Missions to the moon were all faked then how the heel did all that junk get up there.
You can tell Joe is not enjoying this conversation. The guy keeps interrupting Joe with silly points and Joe is having to force politeness back 😅
Nigdy Nikt nie osiągnął pułapu księżyca.
A film był nagrywany w British -
Z pieniędzy podatników City of London Rotchildow Rockefellerow etc...
It could actually be because of the air vents on the suits, which are on the front and they blow any exhaust air in 4 directions: up;down;left;right (so the force is balanced and it doesnt act like a thruster)
Sure, Jan.
Because we never went there in the first place...
Neil Armstrong,Buz Aldren etc get all the plaudits but, I beg every man woman and child to never forget the sacrifice Bruce Willis made for humanity and his selfless bravery so we could be here today!MY HERO!
I hate when people have two different conversations
One problem is something called the Van Allen radiation belt once you get past a little past the space station international there's a very potent radiation belt all the equipment have to be led shielded most likely a lot of stuff would have to be shielded think about it ..
Steel-man for the flag moving. Electro-static energy might be the reason. There is no atmosphere, so no humidity. Pretty sure the astronaut would covered in some lunar dust. Like attracts like. When he walked by the planted flag, a charge traveling up the flag pole would be drawn towards him and when the attraction was broken the flag pole wobbled causing the appearance of the flag blowing in a breeze. Maybe. I don't know. This makes sense to me.
There are charged particles always hitting the astronauts and the flag at all times.
Today we have more questions than answers. 😂😂😂
If you could film it with a "little model going up". Then you can automatically film the real thing. The LRO and russia and china have all seen and admitted to the landings. Its more ridiculous to fake it at this point. Just because one mission across the sea barely made it in a small craft doesnt mean future voyages didnt wait until they had advanced with bigger and better ships.
Yes, someone technically "can" sail around the world in a solo sail boat, but its not advisable...
Just because we did it once 60 years ago doesnt mean that stuff was proof positive 100pct safe and the way to continue. We were lucky we had the success rate we did.
All of a sudden all these people are saying china and russia confirmed we went ... where tf were you people the entire time
What don’t we have a colony on the moon? Why haven’t we been back? Why can’t we get STELLAR footage? Something is going on clearly who’s to say the extent.
All great questions. A truth that is more profound than most people know.
@@Truthrevealed4022 one you learn about the fact we can’t and won’t go back you’ll realize something is being hidden from us.
@@jimmybryant2187 already know what is being hidden.
@@jimmybryant2187 yep its literally in your face as I speak.
And we don't have the money but we can send billions to other countries on a monthly basis 🐉
Jaime “meatloaf”
The moon has 1% earths atmosphere
Why do we care? I should be learning how to evade paying so much taxes right now. Not watching an old argument about if we went to the stupid moon. So what if we didn’t go. Then what? Does the world change? No.
What it means is, what else has been faked. What do you believe happened, that didn't.
These broadcasts were shown in "real time" - there was no thought about how these images could be analyzed in future years by digital technology... or even such simple tech as VHS tech...
The "real time" broadcasts and Nixon's "real time" phone call is BS...you have any idea how long a signal takes to be transmitted either way?
It's called a pendulum, Joe. There's no air resistance on the moon.
I'm curious how there is a breeze when space isn't supposed to have air
Its not a breeze. The flag was vacuum packed. There was energy stored in the material. Like when you bend something and it regains its shape.
@@djuro14there is also a Particle wind on the moon of charged particles from the sun, because the moon has no atmosphere to block them.
@@carrollsanders9376 Never heard of it.
@@djuro14 It's called the solar wind, they can actually use it to propel space craft away from the sun. Charge particles will bounce off the aluminum foil in the space suit and hit the Flag, the crazy conspiracy theorist was told this back in 2006, he knows why the flag moves, but he can't sell books to idiots unless he can convince them the astronauts are in air.
We have gone back.. many times.. they just don't tell you about it. Ask Gary McKinnon.
Gary who?
Joe still dirty at Jamie
poor Jamie
Being there in a vacuum, how are there wrinkles in their space suits? We should be able to measure how much the walls of that thin ship bowed in the vacuum of space with just pictures. How did people live in a ship only pressurized to 4psi for so long? Could we prove by just measuring shadows and figuring out the exact angle of the sun?
We can send all types of AI to look upon all of this stuff there's no reason for us to even go on this background😊
Yeah why don’t we just give all our agency to a government controlled robot. We don’t need to verify anything ourselves the robot will do that for us. I hope the meteorite comes soon.
Quick question? Is it a possibility that the astronaut space suit was blowing air out of the backpack/suit? As he walked by the AIR blew out of the suit and onto the wired flag? Legit question
Wouldn't the flag droop since there IS gravity there? 1/6 th gravity doesn't mean the flag (or astronauts) are weightless.
There is a stick in the top of the flag.
That's my point. The flag should still droop if this was actually on the moon's surface.
@@allenking8427 It cant droop. There is a stick in the top of the flag.
Wasn't it an aluminum flag
Yes because of the charged particles flowing from the sun, constantly striking it.
Flag moves do to static electricity.
We were told not to come back..also we left tons of shit up there and it wasn’t appreciated.
Ok bud
@@KK-lg8uzdo some research because you sound clueless!
Man be quiet with your fictional story tales
@@ZaddyDenz funny how people can't tell what's fictional on this planet anymore.
@@Truthrevealed4022 Its queite simple, trust nothing that's mainstream especially if it comes from the government.
I think JR got choked out one too many times.
We haven't gone back cause we've never been in the first place.
Prove it
@sardonicspartan9343 lol. I think that the burden of proof would lie more on you do prove we have. We can't even zoom in on the supposed flag on the moon from Earth. There is not a telescope powerful enough to do that....anywhere. But somehow we can see Jupiter's storms, Neptune, Pluto....stars and galaxies way beyond even Pluto??? We can send these supposed rovers to drive all over Mars that send pictures back to Earth...but we can't see the flag on our own moon? Why has there never been a single photo taken of Earth from space? Everything out there is AI generated or so close that you can see the land and oceans of Earth. Nothing online that shows the entirety of Earth from any distance whatsoever. It's all relatively close up photos and video. There is so much that doesn't add up its not even funny. There are bubbles in more than half the video footage inside and outside of the ISS and the shuttles while in space. Like you get from filming in the pool that we have for "training" the astronauts to go to the ISS. I could go on and on. Why is there a mouse running around freely on the engine rocket booster that was supposedly a live feed that had already made it unto space beyond the stratosphere??? This is all online for you to look at yourself. Hell, Jared Leto owns the home that was at one time a bunker/film studio that Stanley Kubrick used to film a lot of the shit we were shown back in the day. Admittedly so! This isn't just conspiracy garbage...it's real life lies we've been told! Regardless my advice to you is to find Jesus Christ if you haven't already. He's the way and the only way. Love ya friend. Take care. 👍
Its really the only logical explanation.
@@sardonicspartan9343isn’t strange how Elon, Bezos, and NASA currently cannot make it out of earths orbit. The moon is 384 km away! And till this day not a single recent photo of the flag can be found.
The astronauts are probably wearing something that emits air, like a cooling mechanism in the space suit.
You’d see the air super freezing and turning to ice crystals
Its looks more patriotic to have the flag showing so they wanted it blowing dumb mistake
And why do we only see one half of the moon.
And why is the horizon of the moon so close. Literally looks like the edge of the moon is right there
And why did they let you graduate with such a poor education?
@@sardonicspartan9343why can’t you counter with something that’s intelligent versus a snarky comment?
@@sardonicspartan9343Ok, but why are you so heated about this topic… I genuinely am curious as to why you feel the need to scroll to every comment that “suspects” it’s been falsely reported that we went. Are you a scholar that is knowledge in the subject? You’ve been commenting too damn much 💀😂 I could give 0 fs bout this as whole as I’m just a Joe fan. Do you care to elaborate proof that we went?! I’d love to get more knowledgeable in the subject as whole!
@@michaelshawusa1Bingo! 🤣
that darn air conditioning on the moon always causing problems...
FFS. If you think they didn't go to the moon, watch the lunar rover from Apollo 15, 16 and 17. See how the dust flies up in a much larger parabola than here on earth.
Also, who left the mirrors on the moon that astronomers to this day bounce lasers off to measure the distance from the earth? That was done by Apollo 11.
The astronauts walking past the flag are objects with mass. Is it not possible that they could be dragging small particles of moon dust in their walk that “blows” up against the flag causing it to move? In an atmosphere free environment with no gravity it wouldn’t take much moon debris to cause the flags to move.
I don't believe in anything I'm told and half of what I see, and that's a stretch nowadays.
Wait, you guys dont believe we went to the moon?? 🙈
The direct feed from the moon had to go through Australia before Houston. A woman who worked at the Australian facility swore that she saw a Coca Cola bottle on the ground near the lunar lander. I kid you not.
it was an RC bottle
Root beer.
LOL..Sure, son. If you're that stupid, god help your family.
Direct feed or not, it's still not in real time when the signal reaches anywhere on earth from the moon...do you have any idea how long a signal would take to transmit between the moon and earth? It's certainly more than seconds or minutes! That right there should certainly make one question the validity of the theory.
@@philbuell6657 : z what? lol. Clearly you have no idea about radio or physics. Radio waves travel at the speed of light. Fact.
Thus the time delay one way from the moon to the earth is roughy 1.3 seconds.
I have no idea where you got your information.
Let's be honest.. they did .. they didn't.. how does our lives change either way ?😂
I have seen the stuff on the moon with my own telescope and at the observatory. How did it get there? How are they planting that in my personal telescope? This is right there with flat earth nonsense.
So what do we as citizens if this is true?
No what it was was a re an actment in a studio
Can no telescope that exists today find that flag on the moon?
No.
plus they were jumping around like clowns in a granite sand environment.
We never went
Holy cows 🐮
Its the government what should we expect? The truth?
Exactly
Prove it
@@sardonicspartan9343 Prove they actually went 🤣 I won't hold my breath waiting for your proof 🤷♀️🤣
My favorite video of this guy is where Buzz Aldrin punched him in the mouth.
"Witnesses came forward to the police indicating that "Sibrel had aggressively poked Mr Aldrin with the Bible". When Aldrin refused Sibrel's request, Sibrel followed him, saying: "You're the one who said you walked on the Moon when you didn't." The BBC reported that "Deputy District Attorney Elizabeth Ratinoff told Reuters...videotape shot by a cameraman hired by Mr Sibrel had shown the film-maker follow Mr Aldrin, calling him a 'thief, liar and coward'." Still being recorded by Sibrel's camera crew, Aldrin responded with "Will you get away from me?" and then punched Sibrel in the jaw."
Freak Out ❤
DA GUYS !! the freeking moon is a PORTAL you can't land on it....
If the flag is planted on the moon we should be able to see it from earth with our current camera's
No.
We don't need that stuff if there's😮😮😮 artificial intelligence that will just
Because we went in the first place. Next question.
Nobody ever went to the moon
We havent gone back because when the crew got there they seen something on the dark side of the moon.
the cia on the dark side of the studio more like
Hey fellas I’m starting to think space might be fake…
Nobody has gone back because there's nothing up there 👽
What makes you think that they have not been meteorites and also video film to c these other planets😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
lost the dude when he said 50% chance over three days is 150%, go back to probability class bro, it's 87.5%, it can't be more than 100% chance ever.
NASA keep having to delay proposed manned moon landings.
Because of the spacecrafts' "very real development challenges", according to NASA administrator Bill Nelson.
For instance:
The construction of and delivery of fuel to a proposed orbital gas station that, according to NASA, is necessary for a trip to the moon in this day and age.
In 2024 the scheduled Artemis mission was delayed due to spacesuit development issues.
Seemed a lot simpler in 1969 - with a fraction of the technology we have nowadays!
Are you claiming that NASA said Artemis needs orbital refueling to get to the moon?
@@djuro14 NASA, SpaceX and Eon Musk himself have stated that Artemis 3 - which proposes to land a crew on the lunar surface - will need to implement refueling in low earth orbit.
@@howardbrooks8118 True! Makes sense since Starship is massive compared to Apollo, and reusable.
@@djuro14 Just out of interest:
What's your opinion on the timescale NASA have given to construct and send the fuel depot into LEO?
At the same time, building, testing and launching the spacecraft (APS-R) that will cargo the propellant from the depot to Artemis 3?
Obviously - before all that - Artemis 2 technical delays need to be tested and approved - for instance, the spacesuits, Space X Starship lander among other problematic difficulties.
And - goes without saying - Artemis 2 mission needs to be successfully accomplished.
Never mind that NASA and Space X can't agree on the amount of hydrazine propellant needed to fuel the Artemis 3 mission!
This all before Artemis 3 actually takes off from earth.
NASA project an Artemis 3 mission launch date of September 2026.
Realistic? Or optimistic?
@@howardbrooks8118 Its like asking me about surgery. I have no idea.
The television standard used for sending video from space was not NTSC, the standard in America up until recently. It was fewer lines and a slower frame rate. There was no way to convert standards back then other that by pointing a camera at a monitor.
Okay we astablished that no one went to the moon... the real question is WHY would they go through all that trouble? What were they trying to accomplish?
Hide Jesus.🤭
@@djuro14 on the moon???
@@user-zi9xz4mm6c If pictures(from space) of globe, then Bible not correct.
Its flat Earth nonsense.
Money? the root of all evil