Joe Rogan: Alcohol is far worse than weed. Also Joe Rogan: Drunk driving is not that bad. Cops shouldn't be involved. As a Joe Rogan fan, I can't believe he thinks that drunk driving isn't a serious crime.
Stray7 he fired the taser he took from the cops while running away, watch the footage. If he were to tase the cops, whos to say he wouldn’t have went for the actual gun?
@@Stray7 He's not dead because he was running. Did all of you idiots NOT watch the video? Where he was beating the shit out of the cops and shot them with their own taser? If he was just running away he wouldn't be dead. If he hadn't been a fucking scum bag his entire life, he wouldn't have been in that position. Every shitty choice he made throughout his entire life, led him up to that point, and then he went and made even shittier choices that got him killed.
Rashard was a convicted child abuser that got released early because of COVID, he knew that getting arrested again would get him +6 years in prison so he freaked out.
Joe this is a very easy question. The education department is at fault K-college! You teach white lids to hate themselves, black kids to be victims and everyone else to hate America. Throw in having drag queen story hour for 5 year olds and professors backing antifa, archeologists tweeting diagrams how to properly pull down a statue it’s FUCKIN OBVIOUS who is to BLAME!
Wow. A drunk driver should get a pass because he’s “not trying to hurt anyone..” My wife would lose her shit if she heard this. Her pregnant sister was in labor and on her way to the hospital when a drunk driver struck her, killing her, the baby, the father of the baby, and a friend of theirs. Drunk drivers ARE trying to hurt people. They know they are endangering their own lives and the lives of anyone they drive near, and they _still_ sit in that driver’s seat.
You're missing the distinction that he gave in two ways. (1) He was specifically talking about cases where people had done no harm (no accidents, no striking your wife's pregnant sister and family), but rather someone who is over the limit while driving. (2) He wasn't talking about giving a pass to anyone, but rather citing and getting the people home safely to deal with later in court, rather than arresting , impounding cars, etc. You can certainly disagree, but you shouldn't misstate.
Dude a felon with multiple DUI and was passed out drunk at the drive through window and completely unresponsive...Hey buddy, social worker Jane here...can I call you an Uber?
Rockhardfister A drunk person’s unethical mind that chooses to drive is a deadly weapon. He deserved jail not to be tucked into his own bed. If you’d like, I could ask my 14 year old niece and two brothers 21 and 34 that are 6’ under, because of a pos like that, what they think? Oh wait. I guess I can’t do that.
He may be on to something along the lines take the car...run through booking, release. Found driving again before disposition..automatic 60 days in jail. The laws should be unwavering in their application. What happens post arrest varies way to much, based on to many factors.
Driving is deadly too, and there are plenty of drivers that have been negligent and caused deaths but because they were sober it was just an accident and they got off. But yea, let's ruin people's lives because they MIGHT hurt someone else.
@@BigShepp1432 Love to see all your reports of drivers negligently killing others and getting off. My guess is you have ZERO specific instances in mind...
Dubstep Shep so in your estimate there is no significant or functional difference between sober drivers and intoxicated drivers? One is not more prone to (deadlier) accidents than the other?
Drunk driver put my mom in ICU for 3 days for brain hemorrhage since he hit 2 cars on his way home. A nice and compliant drunk driver is still a drunk driver. Theres plenty of stories of drunk drivers killing other drivers with families, this is nothing new. When a drunk driver send your love ones to ICU or cemetery, you”ll understand my perspective
My best friend in Jr High lost her mom, stepdad and 2 year old brother to a drunk driver. I understand and I have zero sympathy for people who drive drunk and get caught and suffer the consequences.
Damn rights. No sympathy for drunk drivers. I think it should be a one strike kind of thing. Drive drunk once and fuck off you’re not driving anymore. It’s a privilege not a right.
Okay he wasn’t even driving though. He was park taking a nap. Now at that point and I seen it myself because I work at a corner store, they should of called a cab or called his wife. Why take someone to jail? I seen drunk offf duties cops and his buddy either follower him home or takes him. What the difference???? He didn’t need to die. I can understand if he was pulled over on a highway but he wasn’t.
Get educated. That guy in GA was passed out drunk right in the middle of an active drive thru - cops don’t call you an Uber for that; they rightfully take you to jail. Police responded to a call from the public about the situation and did not just happen upon him as the media would have you believe. That guy panicked because he was on parole and a DUI conviction sends him back to the slammer.
Did it warrant 2 shots in the back though is the question? They had his car and all his info already. He was going back to jail no matter what. Let him run, he had nowhere to hide at that point
Pretty much no other civilised country deals with it the way America does. Excessive force on drunken individuals does not end well. American police don't seem to be able to calmly diffuse situations and prefer to kill people
DUI was a violation of parole. The guy was a felon and he didn’t want to go back to jail. Update: Just context, and facts. Understand the situation and draw your own conclusions.
Maybe so but common sense should have prevailed and the police didn't show that. They could have parked his car and drove him home. They escalated a non violent situation into a deadly force outcome. We need the Police but further training is absolutely essential.
@@dwaynejoyce1357 Are you drunk or something? If everyone got free passes for BREAKING THE LAW there would be no need for police. He broke the law.....again.
@@MrLakin11 A msn drunk doesn't deserve to die not in my county anyway but in the states well it happens all to frequently that's why the shit is going down over there now. I though civil liberties were sacrosanct
@@dwaynejoyce1357 He was drunk and behind the wheel. Are you serious? Since when do we expect cops to take drunk drivers home to sleep it off? Last I checked DUI's were taken seriously and the population at large condemn drunk drivers. He then attacked the officers when they were arresting him for the universally agreed crime (Until this case in particular apparently) violently and took the cops weapon and tried to use it against him. SMH. This is getting rediculous
We ask navy seals, journalists, politicians, random people on social media, etc how to reform the police? Shouldn’t we ask the low level police officers who are in the front line and are complaining about police issues but no one wants to listen to them?
The vast majority of these conflicts involve criminal behavior by habitual criminals! The focus is on the wrong side of this issue. It's a naive and reckless ideology.
I see the problem as one of budgets and politics in the name of personal career gain. Saying 'dont defund the police, we mostly do a good job' is correct, but also lazy and cheap. Saying 'then we need more funding into monitoring and training of officers so they can all do a good job' is what would really help change in my opinion.
Well, very high pension plans, extremely high taxes, gum wrapper drug chains triple flowing at the south border, big store companies leaving or bankrupt, and you can guess the binder ingredient,...Then the world in tuned by constant war, yet nobody sees the connectivity of it all,...😡🇺🇸
This comment is exaggerated so that we can see the contradiction. BUT People miss the fact that Joe gave very specific conditions for the whole "Instead of arresting you" idea. I'm not going to put it here, just re-watch the segment.
Are you trolling? The guy wasn't driving, he was sleeping. He only drove when the police told him to move his car. Joe was talking about getting an Uber. Police in other countries find drunk people and are happy to drive them around the corner.
He'll lose it anyway. Sjws are going to dig up some old clip about trans people, crime or whatever. There's simply too many tripwires. You can bet that Spotifys lawyers are already on the case to get out of this contract. Maybe give 50mill to the ADL and 50 mill to Joe to be rid of him.
I won't make a snap judgement based on a half-hour clip when there's still a (remote) possibility that he's honestly misinformed, but I sure hope he's not selling out. What a loss.
Right !! Joe has found his price tag!! The guy from Atlanta was drunk and wrong on all levels !! And I’m a young black man from Atlanta ! The real Atlanta (Linkwood rd)!
They are not Laws they are rules this is one of the real big issues people have been deceived into believing that laws are Laws when they are rules and the cops are coming down heavy on people who violate rules. Rules require people's consent and the people have a right not to consent to them.
@@samrowbotham8914 You're just playing a deceptive sematic word game. There are criminal statues that make DUI illegal in every U.S. state. Laws are generally enacted through the process of indirect consent i.e. dually elected legislatures create and codify almost all laws. If everyone tried to invalidate and weasel their way out of following laws because they viewed them only as "rules" which require personal consent to be valid, society would collapse within months. Imagine telling a judge that laws preventing homicide are not laws, but "rules," and since you doesn't "consent" to those rules, they are invalid and murdering someone isn't a crime. Lol
Where'd you get your research from? I couldn't find anything on child abuse? I did some research I found he was out of jail on probation for credit card fraud he was reportedly using a card that was not his and this arrest would void his probation..
@@grasshopper7000 He stole the taser, ran, turned his torso back and fired taser at cop. It's a deadly weapon. townhall.com/tipsheet/bronsonstocking/2020/06/17/da-in-brooks-shooting-used-to-think-tasers-were-deadly-weapons-n2570858
@@gangalee Usually because they comply with police instead of tackle the police to the ground and try to steal their weapons. In this particular case as well, he was such a great guy that he probably just wanted to go home to beat the shit out of his wife and kid like the good old days. I suppose thats a step up from the usual abandonment of family seen in these communities though.
Yeah my first thought, he was driving drunk and passed out while behind the wheel in the drive thru. That was when the police were called. TBH why would he not drive drunk the next day if he got a ticket.
I agree with you, the Wendy's incident didn't happen because of aggressive policing. The guy had driven the car drunk, was making zero sense, and his alibi just didn't add up. So logical step, let's bring him to the station let him simmer down, figure out what's up. The go to put him in cuffs, he fights. At what logical point can you justify someone grabbing a cops taser and shooting it at them in this incident? The cops were not at fault, and even still the cops were just trying to keep him and everyone else safe.
@@TheTora75 The Left *demonise half of the country as racist, then demonise whole country as inherently racist, destroy cultural artifacts, and with mob rule at that, support people who riot and loot* People: "What's the fucks going on? Fuck you guys! If you don't stop, we'll stop you!" Left: *Suprise pikkakhu face*
@@jameza6129 okaaaaay what u doing. Laughing at this dude cause he thought common scene would extend further out into schools. I mean we all had to think that thought at one point but I think it's more of surprise it's not more normalized but maybe that's just me
@@dropit7694 CNN didn't tell you how he was in jail for felony child abuse, or that he assaulted two cops and took a deadly weapon from one, or that he was shot only after he turned to fire said weapon at a police officer?
@@dropit7694 People armed with a taser who've committed violence against police and are trying to do everything in their power to avoid arrest are very dangerous. There are numerous stories of criminals on the run who have harmed and killed other people.
And I'm sure for some people, a relief that it is. There are enough drunks who can come off as the life of the party, but as soon as they get behind closed doors they turn into a 3rd round slugger. Their arrest may prevent some asshole from going home and beating the living shit out of their family. Even if just for a night.
@@dropit7694 - No, but an officer is justified to use deadly force against a subject who is resisting arrest and has a weapon capable of incapacitating the officer and that is what happened here. Both cops were charged by a politically motivated DA and they will be exonerated and the Mayor will be paying them a hefty civil settlement in civil court.
This was not Joe's finest moment. It was one "wtf" comment after another predicted upon his consumption of specific news, in this case left wing news of that event. To summarize; Joe sounded like an ill informed MORON in this clip
Soifthey did give him an uber home....Rashard would just say yeah I can keep driving drunk and the cops will just give me a ride home!....Until he kills a van load of children the next time.....that's what started MADD in the first place!
He wasn’t a bad guy, just call him an Uber. He was operating a vehicle which can kill you as quick as a firearm. He was so drunk he passed out in a drive thru window. I think Mr. Rogan would have a very different opinion if he were personally affected by a drunk driver. Disgraceful! We have a rule of law, which all must follow or a civilized society will break down.
Maybe but sitting drunk in a stationery vehicle with engine off shouldnt be punished with death, especially if one wants to call itsekf a civilised country that is supposedly so much better than the rest of the planet! Or maybe thats what makes it so.
@@adeosinowo3197 I once slept in my car drunk one night as I needed to add extra parking early the following morning so I could leave it to pick up later in the following day. I did sleep in the passenger seat and keep the keys out the ignition , though, and chose a car park with good CCTV to confirm I hadn't even tried to drive it should I get a knock, but thankfully had no issues
@@adeosinowo3197 he wasnt killed because he was driving drunk. he was killed because when they tried to arrest him for breaking the law and endangering people, he fought them
@@intoHeck1964 ahh ok, so the lesson here is: you deserve to die in cold blood if you challenge the law? And this is what makes your country the greatest on this planet & then by proxy the greatest in this solar system, heck why stop there? It must be the greatest country in the Galaxy!
Wow nice one joe, ive payed thousands of dollars for my first dwi in NYC and you just want cops to drive this guy home lolololo joe u are out of your mind
All of you guys are right he was drunk and he should have went to jail. But he didn’t deserve to die that’s the point. Resisting arrest, assault on a police officer, DUI, all crimes and are arrest able offenses. However, it is not a death sentence you guys are missing the point
Lol. I was offered the same thing by a Maryland trooper. I was left go with a warning. Brooks was parked. Just saying. It happens cops do that all the time.
Ya Joe is out to lunch on Brooks situation. Here in Wisconsin where we have a huge drunk driving problem, the only thing that seems to effectively deter it is escalating the consequences. The police arresting drunk drivers is almost universally agreed on by the public.
Yep, it's a dismantling of America, of capitalism, of law and order in favor of some sort of marxist socialist nightmare where there is only one allowed system of thought.
Wwattz I don’t know of a single group that idolizes scum of the earth more than BLM. Every single “innocent good person” that they put at the forefront of their movement by idolizing then as martyrs, have an underlying story that isn’t told till weeks later. Oh that cop was a racist and hated black people, that’s why he knelt on his neck for 8 minutes... OOOR did they work TOGETHER AT ANOTHER JOB PREVIOUS TO THIS INCIDENT and have recorded confrontations with one another which led to this cop having a previous bias towards the guy? There is always another part of the story they don’t want people to hear. It’s just black vs white.
I respect him for realizing his past mistakes .. but he shares much of the blame for this situation as a liberal university professor. And he still claims to be "Progressive" but surely he simply means that as an adjective? The "Progressive Movement" seems to be everything he's currently complaining about. He senses that there is a much larger, invisible force that is running things .. but yet he says the ANTIFA and BLM buttheads are "leaderless". I'm confused. He is absolutely correct about our American values going down the crapper. I''m not sure what he means by we need "something" to correct for slavery. What does he think we need? We've tried special economic incentives, affirmative action, many programs dedicated to helping black people, we've voted black people into powerful positions, we've shopped at black-owned businesses. Nothing seems to make a difference. Now they are tearing down statues of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln, among others. And I have my browser even telling me .. "hey .. don't forget Black Lives Matter .. you white racist. And something about how we need to just listen" (Firefox) .. as if I needed a reminder and I haven't been listening? I'm sick of this and many others are. They are destroying this country. I say we need to hold everyone accountable for their actions and stop making excuses.
Joe, Brooks was drunk in a public place, in a drive-thru, and he was a great guy until he decided to be NOT be a great guy anymore and fought the police and took a taser which he fired at an officer which escalates the Use Of Force Continuum to deadly force. Brooks made that choice and he should be held accountable for that choice. I'm not against police reform but you can't train a dog to do tricks and then beat it when it does what it's trained.
Because he doesnt know about the criminal history. Because he doesnt take into account the fact that he stole a taser. Question is does he know, im guessing no which is why its not covered.
The cops name is Garrett Rolfe he has 12 complaints against him one of which is for improper use if his firearm. He has been charged with murder. THIS is your hero if so why? When he gets convicted and becomes a felon will you have as much contempt or will this felon be different. If you are for law and order then you should support the charges this is the same justice system that found Rayshard guilty or will it be different then. For many of you commenting this is absolutely about race and you absolutely are racists and you use alot of language and pretence to cover it up. I would be better if you stopped using law and order language and just say what you really mean. It has become increasingly clear even if you are still lying to yourselves.
As a black man I respect that they both know what they’re talking about, something that’s needed in today’s society. Too much Ig And TMZ etc etc ...social engineering is giving false power and knowledge that has very little to do with coming together as one regardless of race.
We need more nuanced discussion like this, we all have different opinions on this, if we can't talk about it then there will be civil war this is why I hate the left who tries to silence every voice of nuance.
"as a black man" "as a white man" "as a woman" "as a short person" Why bother to identify with race at all? Its superficial. You give it power with words, you're casting spells about what reality you are plucking out of infinite possibilities with self limiting beliefs and language. Racism ends as soon as we stop bringing it into existence by validating the construct with language that creates some illusion based difference between yourself and another entity. As soon as people stop writing this script for themselves to follow we can all stop ourselves playing out this terrible identity politics based drama that will lead to further seperration and more hate based experiential outcomes.. If you ignore it it ceases to exist.
During the collapse of Yugoslavia in the absence of structured power after the war and atrocities. The power vacuum was filled by criminal gangs. Don’t destroy your country by letting go of rule of law.
@momentinpassing That just isn't true just look at what happened in CHAZ once there was no rule of law. Certain elements thought great lets take advantage and settle a few scores. People really need to take a good look at everything that played out there that's the future you will have if you pursue misguided ideals. It's not going to turn into a hippy festival the vacuum will be filled with those more brutal and better able to hold onto power. You want to see an unfairly stacked system just keep tugging at the threads.
Nino Carrion yes we should arrest anyone doing something illegal. Moment said there is one rule for one and another for the rich. I’m saying there is one rule for all under the law. By all means arrest corrupt people in the finance sector, law enforcement doing anything illegal as well as arrest people smashing up businesses and trying to burn down court houses. I mentioned CHAZ to show it as a microcosm of what will happen in the event of civil collapse drawing the parallel to the Yugoslav civil war. Why because I know people who were there as peace keepers, and people who had to flee their own country due to the rampant criminality. Once there was no formal rule of law being enforced it was party time for those that would take advantage of that. Then the battle to regain rule of law is a process that would take decades.
@@TheCoolerChannel No but assaulting police officers and stealing their tazedr than firing that same stolen taser at them while resisting arrest sure will.
@@rdot8658 he was asleep at the wheel of a running vehicle in a drive thru of a restaurant. In most states just being drunk in a car with the keys constitutes a DUI.
@@rdot8658 He drove to the Wendy's and fell asleep in the drive thru line he was so drunk. Its unfortunate hes dead but he should've handled it way differently.
“Order me an Uber” where is the personal responsibility joe? He chose to drink and he chose to drive. If you’re a big boy, you can also do the responsible thing and get an Uber yourself, beforehand.
Freedom died a long time ago. Really have to arrest someone for that? And kill them? And people think North Korea is brutal. You people crave an authoritarian regime
@@fxmilitia1130 The rule of law is freedom. You should have the freedom to do what you want within the constraints of the law. When people break laws and arbitrarily get away with it, more people disrespect more laws. A breakdown of law and order is a loss of freedom. Society is when we trade some restrictions (minimum necessary laws) in exchange for other freedoms. Freedoms include safety and the ability to pursue prosperity via voluntary interactions with others. Are laws against drink driving necessary for public safety? Yes.
He gets ticketed and has to go to court, it's not just get an Uber and go home bye bye. Rogan has a point, the weight of the sanction matters much less than the propensity of getting one so long as there is some sort of balance. If people were certain to get 500 USD fines for drunk driving, no one would do it. If 0.1% of them get caught and need to go 2 weeks in jail, people won't care. You can argue that the rich then would not care because they can just pay, and you'd be right, so community service should be added to it.
@@marcus8710 not surprisingly. The elite academia was certain the communist russia would surpass and last longer than the usa. One man out of a small college and joined the airforce, stated against all the intellects that the ussr would fall and it was a hell hole. Turns out that man was right and his name was ronald reagan. No marxist to this day applauds the ussr.
Probably. But there is something to be said about how people are villainized for something that's rather subjective. What is "drunk"? Is it .08 for everyone? No. Some people at .08 aren't ganna have any problems. Whereas some are with even less alcohol. Before breathalyzers they would take you in if you were obviously drunk. When GW Bush got his you had to be absolutely slammered. Now, you're blind if you don't see how much it's about money and not public safety. However, EVERYBODY knows you can't fight the cops so I have no sympathy for this particular character. I live in Arizona, the strictest state in the union in regards to DUI's. Its ridiculously easy to get one. Do people still do it? Sure. But people just wanna go home. And people should be able to do so if there's no REAL reason to believe that they will cause an accident. Giving up liberty for a false sense of security. But sure, it's all just to protect you...
Yeah, smh on that one... someone driving behind the wheel intoxicated needs serious repercussions. Whether they’re arrested is one question, but to say that they should merely get a ticket isn’t severe enough imo.
Michael Valente what kind of backwards logic is that? Drunk driving is extremely reckless behavior. When you drink and drive you’re necessarily impaired and thus pose a significant threat to others. Sober drivers can easily be negligent or even reckless with their driving, and yes, kill others. but they’re not automatically impared from the get-go. It’s not the same level of risk.
Michael Valente bro you’re an idiot. You can get charged with vehicular manslaughter if you kill someone in a car crash and it wasn’t a complete accident. And if you’re on your phone or something you do get charged with a crime. Because that shit is illegal.
I believe that the kids, at large, are living out the “Purge” fantasy. They are high on the ability to act out violently without repercussion. So, the movement is largely fueled by rage with almost no clear cause; violence through action equals lawless chaos.
Maybe all the rage, resentment, and frustration that we are seeing lately has to do with the younger generations declining living standards, the fact that both major political parties and most politicians aren't responsive to the needs to their constituents, the fact that the cops are basically just a group of thugs who are paid by the government and given military grade weapons and gear, the fact that economic inequality is reaching unprecedented levels, etc. People feel disenfranchised and that nothing is being done to reform or correct this injustices. You can only keep ramping up the pressure inside a pressure cooker so long before it eventually explodes into anarchy, revolution or civil war.
Joe, brooks was passed out driving in the drivethru. He also abused his children and was on probation. You cant just send somebody home on an uber after a DUI.
He was accused and convicted of child cruelty or some such, but probably shouldn't parrot the claim that he actually abused his children unless you knew the family first-hand. But that's irrelevant, which makes it seem like you're using past crimes to justify murder. What's actually relevant: current law says drunk driving is a very serious criminal offense and does not allow cops to simply let a drunk driver go home or sleep it off in their car. If cops COULD let people off the hook for drunk driving they would do it a lot more often, dealing with drunks is not a fun time, but the general public insists that drunk driving is very serious since it keeps getting us killed in horrible car accidents.
Check MADD (Mother Against Drunk Driving) twitter feed. Crickets (except for all the comments wondering why they haven't mentioned it like they do all drunk driving cases)
Was he driving drunk or drunk and asleep in a drive thru... There's a huge difference,drunk driving can kill people but sleeping in a drive thru just pisses people off.
Drunk driving in itself is a victimless crime unless someone or something is damaged, hurt, or killed which is already a crime. We shouldn't drive drunk bc it's stupid and dangerous but lots of legal things are stupid and dangerous. No victim = no crime should be the basis for all law. Going away from this is going toward fascism and away from autonomy and freedom even if it makes the world less safe. The amount of damage/income destruction and cost due to DUI laws are far more damaging overall then the relatively few tragic accidents caused by it. It manufactures criminals in order for a false sense of safety with little actual safety created compared to the negative effects created. Fines and loss of license? Sure. Jail time? That's just excessive.
He was sleep in the car & either way the police are to detain not kill. Black people are mad because our tax dollars pay for police who don't detain so you Can have a day in court...you just "magically" end up dead & we talking old,young,men,women & children
Asking to be let go after getting caught doing something that kills thousands of people, drinking and driving, is ridiculous. Oh, he asked for an uber! We better let him go, then! 💩
Just ban alcohol and then we won’t have drunk drivers who might either kill someone in an accident or get killed by the cops for being passed out in a drive through. Simple fix just like banning guns to prevent mass shooters.
@@JohnMiller-cq2fw Most people driving around with unregistered AK-47s probably don't kill people either. Should we just not worry about it then? Your argument is ridiculous.
@@andrewthomas5769 I'd rather have one cool guy that is man enough to drive a car while at 4+ alcohol perthousand blood than any of your kind. Spoiled, yelling, selfish, no idea what dignity means.
T J Would you care to elaborate? A lot is covered in 24 minutes lol which conclusion are they dead wrong about? All of them? One conclusion which is drawn is that our current system facilitates continued suffering. So if one generation of a family is suffering, the odds are great that the following generation of that family will suffer too. Are they “dead wrong” about that? In other words, do you think upward mobility is made EASIER by our current set of laws?
I see again people that don't understand policing and need to back them 100 percent. When someone resist arrest they are putting the officers life at risk. The incident in Atlanta could have been avoided simply by the criminal copying with the officer. If the officer didn't arrest him and he drove off and killed someone the officer himself would be in trouble. These police experts need to shut up period about policing unless they have actually done it. That means Joe Rogan is absolutely pandering to the left.
I think what certain places (I believe places like LA) want to implement is a community solution - have a community "guard" to approach nonaggressive, nonviolent criminals and solve the issue at hand. I disagree with the approach, but it's what Joe was advocating
Rayshard Brooks was on parole so in violation of his parole they had to arrest him. Letting him go defeats the purpose of having conditions for those on parole EDIT: I'm not arguing whether or not they should have shot Rayshard Brooks. I'm arguing against Joe Rogan's point that they should have called him an Uber or taken him home. If you watch the body cam footage, the officer gave Brooks the benefit of the doubt initially (asked him if he just had a long day and fell asleep while waiting) and asked Brooks to just pull over and park to sleep. But when Brooks fell back asleep in the drive thru line, the officer began to have his suspicions because he smelled alcohol and noticed that Brooks had a glossy eyes. That's why the officer ended up asking for his license and registration and calling another officer. Brooks got out of the vehicle a couple of times and the officer told him nicely to get back into his vehicle. Once they found out that Brooks was on parole AND that he was driving under the influence after Brooks failed a field sobriety test, they had to follow protocol and arrest him. Right when they told him he was going to be arrested, that's when Brooks began to resist. I find it ridiculous that people want to argue that police don't know how to do their jobs and once they begin to do it right, people want them to break the rules and not follow protocol. The argument of whether or not they should have shot him is a separate argument because the circumstances changed once he began resisting and grabbed the officer's taser.
@@Etatdesiege1979 Did you not watch the video where he, while running, shot the officer behind him with the taser? Did you miss the part where he punched the cops head against the ground? I honestly can't imagine how people are dumb enough that they can't imagine a scenario where shooting someone in the back is necessary to save your own life or the life of others.
Also, a DUI arrest isn't a 'go to jail' offense for most people. They arrest you, process you, and usually release you the same night. Rayshard's problem was that he was on probation (he was released due to COVID-19) and a DUI arrest on probation means his probation would probably be revoked and he somehow thought fighting the cops would solve that problem.
Amen, its against the the law to drive drunk. "Who called the cops on him"? Really joe? He was past out in a drive thru if maybe knowone calls the authorities maybe he drives and kills someone. Thats why. And as cordial as he was so were the police in this case. Take your medicine if you fuck up, and he wasnst a saint just got of jail wit this pity party america is in right now.
Joe loves to dance on the fence when a situation involves a POC. He has to dance to the music until that Spotify paycheck starts kicking in, god forbid he gets deMANEYtized by UA-cam
It's a form of linguistic programming. NPR uses this form of communication effectively. This is the way people "Program" others to do their bidding .. by speaking in a calming manner.
@dennis Woodbury. Please consider opening up your mind a bit. Everything an “old school liberal” says isn’t wrong just because you’ve classified them in that realm. There is something to be said for experience!
The idea that a drunk driver is just a nice guy who made a little mistake is a very dangerious one, as is the notion that skin color should be seen as a factor. If the policy across the country was "be nice, de-escalate, call a rideshare, we would see a major increase in fatalities, much like we are seeing with retail theft.
@@squidious1662 -- No its not their job but I think Joe's point is that maybe that it might be better if that particular act of social service should be built into their job. Which of the two scenarios is preferred? The officers call an Uber, the three men continue to exchange cordial banter until the Uber arrives and then it takes him home. The other scenario ends with him getting shot in the back. Is there a third option? That said, my sense is that I'm actually more on your side ... i.e., the cops side. The cardinal rule, in my opinion, for police on citizen interactions should be that the citizen is required to obey an officer's lawful command!! I'm furious that the media and the democrats are not crying out with passion for the looting to stop. I'm furious with the health experts who are suddenly saying that it's OK to line the streets by the thousands and breath down each other's neck. I'm perplexed at the notion that the American flag has become a symbol of inequality and oppression. I don't get it. What gives me some comfort is that some progressive intellectuals are addressing the ludicrousy of the thinking of the revolutionaries. Weisenstein does a good job here. Sam Harris did do on his podcast. Sorry for rambling.
@@emptyforrest Stupid comment. He resisted arrest, punched a cop, stole his taser, fled, then turned and shot the stolen taser at the cop. Nice try though.
@Vladimir Peter I think people need to understand drunk driving killing people is way more of a problem then dying at the hands of police. Lets take 2018 - "there were 10,511 fatalities in motor vehicle traffic crashes in which at least one driver had a BAC of .08 g/dL or higher" - crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812864 Now take a guess how many people died to police in 2018. How about 403 - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_killings_by_law_enforcement_officers_in_the_United_States
I used to drive with Uber and Lyft there was an occasion I had to pick up a guy from Waffle House and when I arrived it was two police officers who had ordered a ride for a drunk guy
To add something (and I don't know if this is true or not) but I read that he actually drove to Wendy's drunk and fell asleep in his car in the drive through and that is why police were called in the first place. Again, I can't confirm this other than the article I read. If I can find it again, I'll try to post a link here.
Damn Joe, I usually agree with you, but a program to call a freaking Uber. Do you know how many innocent people are killed by drunk drivers every year. Damn that was dumb!!!
He didn’t say he was in favour of drunk driving. He said he’s in favour of allocating the police to serious crime with alternatives for non immediate threats.
@@dicerevo Someone drunk behind the wheel of a 5000 pound vehicle is an immediate threat. Cops should not be tasked with taking responsibility for other people's bad decisions. You are responsible for your own decisions. Every day, almost 30 people in the United States die in drunk-driving crashes - that's one person every 50 minutes. If you decide to drive while drunk you not deserve a free uber to get you home. You deserve to be punished.
@@dicerevo *Drink driving ISN'T an immediate threat…???* When I was 5 a drunk driver plowed into my friends, as they stood right next to me, at 40 MPH! He literally almost killed them! So maybe we have much different opinions on how to treat drunk drivers.
He definitely looked friendly and "peaceful" when he punched those officers and shot a taser at one. This was clearly the model citizen we would want to call an Uber for.
Y C He assaulted the cops, then stole the taser and tried to shoot one of the cops in the face with it. You’re too stupid for this conversation. Stfu and go outside and play.
I know, right? And as if the wife and child abuse wasn't enough, he got behind the wheel of a car intoxicated and then tried to taser a police officer.
Wasn't Rayshard Brooks caught asleep drunk in the Wendy's drive-thru which is why the cops were called? He admitted to the cops he had been drinking. That qualifies as DUI in any jurisdiction. The police were rightfully called and had every right to arrest him because of it.
@@rdot8658 he wouldn't have had he complied with the officers instead of punching the officer and then taking his Tazer and pointing it at the officer and firing it
Sota Pop Brooks passed out drunk in the drive thru of the Wendy’s. How do you think he ended up in the drive-thru in his car? Also, you’re wrong about Georgia Law. You can be found guilty of DUI including: “Warm hood of the car, which also suggests the car was driven recently” and many other signs. You’re the moron.
Joe man, drunk behind the wheel and we’re gonna get him an Uber?! Haha let’s throw it all the way back to the early 80s and just pour the beer out and tell him to drive himself home
What if he never killed anyone? What if he got caught by himself alone right after he left? I think we're advanced enough as a fucking nation to tow his car, make him pay a FAT fine, uber his ass home. Why waste 3 years of resources and not adress his initial problem when we can attacj the source of drunk driving and facilitate more rational responses to ALL infractions.
@@dm3402 Because the harsh punishment for drunk driving is deterrent to prevent drunk drivers. Do you realize that every 50 minutes someone gets killed by a drunk driver? It's more serious than you seem to realize.
That was so misleading he was in the drive thru passed out drunk, it was his 2nd DUI so he already had that warning not to do it and also he was on parole for child abuse so idk what I missed he started going crazy when they told him he was under arrest. Did they get to joe or is joe not fully informed?🤔
Perhaps the stupidest thing Joe has ever said. If you give someone a ride every time they are caught DUI then they will do it again and again until they hurt someone.
I was surprised to hear Joe say this as well. Just call him an Uber, no harm done? Maybe this time. What about the next time? DUI punishments are harsh for a reason.
Yeah he's wrong on them not being a big deal, they fucking are, obviously. From what I understand though it was a bad kill. Why didn't they kill the fuck who hit my friends brother on his bicycle doing 120k in a 60 zone, why didn't they kill him after he got caught again six months later... Not the smartest thing he's said but I get what he was saying. That guy didn't need to die, he just fucked up.
the guy was drunk joe....a drunk driver killed my sister and you want me to agree that the cops should just pull them over and call an uber......no lesson learned with that...stiff punishment is the only deterrent
@@eliudnjai well lets see he punched both officers in the face took there taser ran and started firing of the taser at the officer while running which could of killed the officer if it hit him in the right place i have no pity also he said he was gonna go "a couple minuets down the road" as well
Also what just call him an Uber? So it's OK if I drive hammered and pass out behind the wheel? I'm white and I live in Canada and I promise you as sure as the sky is blue the cops are dragging my drunk ass to jail if I do that
Yea, he implied that Rayshard was harmless but nobody who is impaired while driving is harmless. If he would've driven his car into Joe's family then Joe would be singing a different tune today and frankly it's a slap in the face to anyone who has lost a loved one to a drunk driver. Oh, or yea we can just call Rayshard an Uber so he can possibly throw up in their back seat or worse... put them in danger. Raise your hand if you would trust a drunk ex convict stranger who did time for violent crimes in the back seat of your car.
@Ashwin Varghese oh ok, so they should have let him run wild through the neighborhood with a taser in his hand? Or should they have let him shoot one of them with a taser? Which scenario makes more sense to you?
@Ashwin Varghese Except he wasn't shot for being drunk. He was shot for grabbing a cops weapon out of its holster and then running for cover. Truly not hard to figure that one out. Cop better get off.
@@yankees29 As well as the fried egg in a pan saying this is your brain on drugs. Anybody remember Bill Hicks. LOL! ua-cam.com/video/5T4XBwALPi0/v-deo.html
@@johnsmith9731 No he was just being "peaceful" come on now, let him take an uber home. Drunk driving should be like it was in the 1960s, just a warning. Also, if you shoot a taser at a cop they should just accept that. It's peaceful remember.
People in my country are not protesting because we do not have here these "humans" in our coutry and therefore we live in peace. Closed borders save lives.
Hey Joe Rogan I’m a big fan and I also love hearing different perspectives and opinions on solutions on how we can do police reform. I would like to hear from maybe one of the leaders in the organization of the black lives better move it and share some facts on your show on what they’re doing and why they’re doing it
If one of my family members was fighting with the cops like that and stole a taser, I would expect you to shoot their dumb ass!!! You sensitive ass people.
Joe's either totally uninformed/misinformed about that incident, or he's simply a moron. The cops were more than respectful and tried to reason with that guy for over an hour. He was passed out drunk in a drive-thru with his car running. When they confirmed he was DUI and tried to place him under arrest, he attacked them and tried to use a tazer against an officer. They did what they are legally obliged to do in that situation. He was not a victim of brutality. He was a moron who play a stupid game and won a stupid prize.
My takeaway from this is that Joe drives drunk or high sometimes. Didn't he have a huge argument with Steven Crowder about how driving under the effects of weed was fine?
I guess it depends on the person. Driving impaired under any kind of drug is bad, even caffeine. There's prescriptions out there that clearly state not to operate machinery. Joe doesn't know what he's talking about and if you get pulled over reeking of weed they'll bust you for that even if it's legal to smoke.
go ahead and walk home. the cops the leave. he sneaks back and drives off. this time in a rush and even more prone to have accident. tell that to the MADD groups that forced jail time and automatic arrest for BAC levels that keep dropping over the decades.
I did that once 2 years ago. Police came & told me to pull my car to the side and sleep it off. I didn't die. That's the problem. I would've been dead had I been black.
The problem is people are dying off bs like falling asleep in a drive thru. The fact of the matter is if those police officers pulled up without guns and knew how to handle themselves physically. That man would still be alive ... his life mattered. Joe understands that and that is what we should be focused on
@@rdot8658 He did not "fall asleep" at a drive thru. He was passed out drunk at a drive thru, then physically assaulted two police officers, stole their weapon and fired it at them. How is that anywhere close to "falling asleep"?
Ryan Simmonds to be fair Ryan, like you said if the officers never arrived with guns the man would be alive. However, at the point of the shooting he was aiming a taser at an officer. The same justice department that labeled a taser as a LETHAL weapon (another debate) labels this shooting as a felony murder. Please show me an example where defending yourself against a deadly weapon would be murder. You’re correct, if the officers never had guns, one man wouldn’t have died, but if that same man simply complied, no deaths would have come from this run in with the police. Joe’s idea is absolutely incredible and perhaps we should have different types of policing for different types of crimes, but there will always be belligerence against the system, so no matter how peaceful the crime, there is no way to guarantee the safety of the officer without a gun. The real answer is raising physical standards so that ALL officers can physically overpower anyone they come in contact with so that guns are only needed against other deadly weapons.
Kaz Canning understood ... did he deserve to die ? I’ve seen multiple videos Of white dudes doing worse shit and not getting gunned down on the spot. They need to be better at their jobs so regular altercations do not turn into murders
Dude anyone can kill someone. There are millions of drunk people all over the world every day, and we all know that alcohol increases the chances of all sorts of violence but we don't have police supervision for every drunk. Now if they did find another way to get him somewhere safe without violence or the threat of violence, everything would be just fine.
Man, i've seen videos where that guy rocked 2 cops and then stole their taser. You can say they shouldn't have shot him dead, but you can't say that man was compliant.
Thank you! I've been saying this since they rolled it out. The scary part is, that was their best take. That was the best they could get him to perform. 😬
@@blacksuite1 No one's saying that he should have died, but his death was due to his choices. The theoretical person/people he could have killed driving drunk would not have been due to their decisions.
this guest makes an intelligent point that everything that is happening is a symptom of our economic/political system and everyone ignores that to attack joe on a bad point that the guest immediately glossed over. this chat is a perfect example of the guests point.
The man who is famous for standing up to BS just made an excuse for spotify money..we all know that the system is in a death thrall that's why we are here in the first place
Tbh I understand why this person should get arrested but I still do think they should prosecute people for drug use and dealing (only if there driving and causing a danger) and that if someone is driving they should try to either impound there car or make someone else in the car drive the car instead of the person intoxicated.
Johnny Hammersticks not really a lot of the problems with illegal drugs and a lot of deaths behind them are because of them being illegal I would say most drug deaths would drop if they Juss controlled these substances more
Brandon Campbell - Because the acts he commit we’re done directly by him, not more than a few years ago. Blaming an entire people group for things done by other people generations ago, all that are no longer alive, is a textbook definition of racism. My family was not even in America during the time of slavery, some of them where the victims of racism.
You kind of take away from every single person who has lost a daughter, mother, brother.. a son.. to a drunk driver, that's why its illegal, that's why they arrest people doing so.
Bret is a bozo, he can’t let go of his bias against republicans, conservatives, and trump because of his perception that “they are the party of big business and don’t care about the people” from 40 years ago.... yeah right when the democrats have been advocating for gun control for almost 100 years now
Yeah I was going to finish this until Joe started talking about letting drunk drivers take an Uber home after they've been found drunk and asleep in the drive-thru...🙄
Exactly wtf it's harmless until he fucking drives drunk on the wrong side of the freeway and kills Joe's family, I can't believe he justifys the guys behavior.
Joe Rogan: Alcohol is far worse than weed.
Also Joe Rogan: Drunk driving is not that bad. Cops shouldn't be involved.
As a Joe Rogan fan, I can't believe he thinks that drunk driving isn't a serious crime.
He's saying a guy shouldn't be dead just for being drunk, but the guy is dead for trying to escape detainment and stealing an officer's weapon.
@@glemmstengal He wasn't killed for drunk driving. I'm not understanding Joes context and point...is the point
@@glemmstengal Guy shouldn't be dead for that, either. Running from a cop should not be a death sentence.
Stray7 he fired the taser he took from the cops while running away, watch the footage. If he were to tase the cops, whos to say he wouldn’t have went for the actual gun?
@@Stray7 He's not dead because he was running. Did all of you idiots NOT watch the video? Where he was beating the shit out of the cops and shot them with their own taser? If he was just running away he wouldn't be dead. If he hadn't been a fucking scum bag his entire life, he wouldn't have been in that position. Every shitty choice he made throughout his entire life, led him up to that point, and then he went and made even shittier choices that got him killed.
Rashard was a convicted child abuser that got released early because of COVID, he knew that getting arrested again would get him +6 years in prison so he freaked out.
I'm not a big fan of child abusers.
Correct!
#NoNakerDiet Saves Lives!
#PinkPill living! 💙 👨✌
Trump 2020
Trump can straighten this out after he re-elected
Joe this is a very easy question. The education department is at fault K-college! You teach white lids to hate themselves, black kids to be victims and everyone else to hate America. Throw in having drag queen story hour for 5 year olds and professors backing antifa, archeologists tweeting diagrams how to properly pull down a statue it’s FUCKIN OBVIOUS who is to BLAME!
Wow. A drunk driver should get a pass because he’s “not trying to hurt anyone..”
My wife would lose her shit if she heard this. Her pregnant sister was in labor and on her way to the hospital when a drunk driver struck her, killing her, the baby, the father of the baby, and a friend of theirs.
Drunk drivers ARE trying to hurt people. They know they are endangering their own lives and the lives of anyone they drive near, and they _still_ sit in that driver’s seat.
You're missing the distinction that he gave in two ways. (1) He was specifically talking about cases where people had done no harm (no accidents, no striking your wife's pregnant sister and family), but rather someone who is over the limit while driving. (2) He wasn't talking about giving a pass to anyone, but rather citing and getting the people home safely to deal with later in court, rather than arresting , impounding cars, etc. You can certainly disagree, but you shouldn't misstate.
@@oboogie2 except for the fact that this man was a multiple felon with previous drunk driving convictions 🤦
Dude a felon with multiple DUI and was passed out drunk at the drive through window and completely unresponsive...Hey buddy, social worker Jane here...can I call you an Uber?
Rockhardfister A drunk person’s unethical mind that chooses to drive is a deadly weapon. He deserved jail not to be tucked into his own bed. If you’d like, I could ask my 14 year old niece and two brothers 21 and 34 that are 6’ under, because of a pos like that, what they think? Oh wait. I guess I can’t do that.
@@swfarms63 why are you telling me this? I didn't say he should get a pass. I made a case that the cops were right.
Drunk driving is deadly, Joe. Can't just send this guy on his way.
He may be on to something along the lines take the car...run through booking, release. Found driving again before disposition..automatic 60 days in jail. The laws should be unwavering in their application. What happens post arrest varies way to much, based on to many factors.
I thought his drunk ass fell asleep sitting in the drive through line. And that’s what initiated the restaurant to call LE.
Driving is deadly too, and there are plenty of drivers that have been negligent and caused deaths but because they were sober it was just an accident and they got off. But yea, let's ruin people's lives because they MIGHT hurt someone else.
@@BigShepp1432 Love to see all your reports of drivers negligently killing others and getting off. My guess is you have ZERO specific instances in mind...
Dubstep Shep so in your estimate there is no significant or functional difference between sober drivers and intoxicated drivers? One is not more prone to (deadlier) accidents than the other?
Drunk driver put my mom in ICU for 3 days for brain hemorrhage since he hit 2 cars on his way home.
A nice and compliant drunk driver is still a drunk driver.
Theres plenty of stories of drunk drivers killing other drivers with families, this is nothing new.
When a drunk driver send your love ones to ICU or cemetery, you”ll understand my perspective
My best friend in Jr High lost her mom, stepdad and 2 year old brother to a drunk driver. I understand and I have zero sympathy for people who drive drunk and get caught and suffer the consequences.
Damn rights. No sympathy for drunk drivers. I think it should be a one strike kind of thing. Drive drunk once and fuck off you’re not driving anymore. It’s a privilege not a right.
Sorry for your loss🙏
Okay he wasn’t even driving though. He was park taking a nap. Now at that point and I seen it myself because I work at a corner store, they should of called a cab or called his wife. Why take someone to jail? I seen drunk offf duties cops and his buddy either follower him home or takes him. What the difference???? He didn’t need to die. I can understand if he was pulled over on a highway but he wasn’t.
Christopher Allen lol in a drive thru. It’s called a DRIVE THRU for a reason. Not a PARKING LOT
Get educated. That guy in GA was passed out drunk right in the middle of an active drive thru - cops don’t call you an Uber for that; they rightfully take you to jail. Police responded to a call from the public about the situation and did not just happen upon him as the media would have you believe.
That guy panicked because he was on parole and a DUI conviction sends him back to the slammer.
Did it warrant 2 shots in the back though is the question? They had his car and all his info already. He was going back to jail no matter what. Let him run, he had nowhere to hide at that point
u wrong
They use to until MADD came along.
And then they shot him. Convo ends there. How is there confusion about this
Pretty much no other civilised country deals with it the way America does. Excessive force on drunken individuals does not end well. American police don't seem to be able to calmly diffuse situations and prefer to kill people
DUI was a violation of parole. The guy was a felon and he didn’t want to go back to jail.
Update: Just context, and facts. Understand the situation and draw your own conclusions.
Maybe so but common sense should have prevailed and the police didn't show that. They could have parked his car and drove him home. They escalated a non violent situation into a deadly force outcome. We need the Police but further training is absolutely essential.
@@dwaynejoyce1357 Are you drunk or something? If everyone got free passes for BREAKING THE LAW there would be no need for police. He broke the law.....again.
@@MrLakin11 A msn drunk doesn't deserve to die not in my county anyway but in the states well it happens all to frequently that's why the shit is going down over there now. I though civil liberties were sacrosanct
@@dwaynejoyce1357 He was drunk and behind the wheel. Are you serious? Since when do we expect cops to take drunk drivers home to sleep it off? Last I checked DUI's were taken seriously and the population at large condemn drunk drivers. He then attacked the officers when they were arresting him for the universally agreed crime (Until this case in particular apparently) violently and took the cops weapon and tried to use it against him. SMH. This is getting rediculous
@God sees all!!! They let him out cause of the Covid-19
We ask navy seals, journalists, politicians, random people on social media, etc how to reform the police? Shouldn’t we ask the low level police officers who are in the front line and are complaining about police issues but no one wants to listen to them?
A lot of cops get in trouble for posting their opinions on instagram
Other countries have two years training, that would be a good start
The vast majority of these conflicts involve criminal behavior by habitual criminals! The focus is on the wrong side of this issue. It's a naive and reckless ideology.
I see the problem as one of budgets and politics in the name of personal career gain.
Saying 'dont defund the police, we mostly do a good job' is correct, but also lazy and cheap.
Saying 'then we need more funding into monitoring and training of officers so they can all do a good job' is what would really help change in my opinion.
Well, very high pension plans, extremely high taxes, gum wrapper drug chains triple flowing at the south border, big store companies leaving or bankrupt, and you can guess the binder ingredient,...Then the world in tuned by constant war, yet nobody sees the connectivity of it all,...😡🇺🇸
“Excuse me sir...you’ve just ran over a family in your drunken state. Can I get you an Uber?”
That has nothing to do with what happened in this case. Why are you so irrational?
Uhm this comment has everything to do with the video, Joe.
This comment is exaggerated so that we can see the contradiction. BUT People miss the fact that Joe gave very specific conditions for the whole "Instead of arresting you" idea. I'm not going to put it here, just re-watch the segment.
Are you trolling?
The guy wasn't driving, he was sleeping. He only drove when the police told him to move his car. Joe was talking about getting an Uber. Police in other countries find drunk people and are happy to drive them around the corner.
This isn’t what people are saying at all, Jesus chriiiiiist
Joe "I better not say the wrong thing and lose my huge Spotify deal" Rogan.
Tip toe joe
@Libs Hate Montesquieu I unsubbed after seeing this shit show of an interview. He's completely gone now.
He'll lose it anyway. Sjws are going to dig up some old clip about trans people, crime or whatever. There's simply too many tripwires. You can bet that Spotifys lawyers are already on the case to get out of this contract. Maybe give 50mill to the ADL and 50 mill to Joe to be rid of him.
I won't make a snap judgement based on a half-hour clip when there's still a (remote) possibility that he's honestly misinformed, but I sure hope he's not selling out. What a loss.
Right !!
Joe has found his price tag!!
The guy from Atlanta was drunk and wrong on all levels !!
And I’m a young black man from Atlanta !
The real Atlanta (Linkwood rd)!
"Compliant"? He punched a cop. Are you insane, Joe?
@D D he drove drunk, so they were going to arrest him.
Joe is 100% wrong on this
He was a Angel poor Brooks he only abuse his children, he deserves pass... Justice for Brooks 😂
Proof?
@@deeznutz1498 TWAT
No Joe, Drunk Drivers are a threat to everyone else on the road. Yes they should be arrested, hence we have laws.
They are not Laws they are rules this is one of the real big issues people have been deceived into believing that laws are Laws when they are rules and the cops are coming down heavy on people who violate rules. Rules require people's consent and the people have a right not to consent to them.
@@samrowbotham8914 There are drunk driving laws in Canada, if there isn't in the US, then there should be.
@@LGB007 you missed his whole point.
@@LGB007 proud of you tho
@@samrowbotham8914
You're just playing a deceptive sematic word game. There are criminal statues that make DUI illegal in every U.S. state. Laws are generally enacted through the process of indirect consent i.e. dually elected legislatures create and codify almost all laws. If everyone tried to invalidate and weasel their way out of following laws because they viewed them only as "rules" which require personal consent to be valid, society would collapse within months. Imagine telling a judge that laws preventing homicide are not laws, but "rules," and since you doesn't "consent" to those rules, they are invalid and murdering someone isn't a crime. Lol
Do your research. Brooks was on parole for beating his children.
Where'd you get your research from? I couldn't find anything on child abuse? I did some research I found he was out of jail on probation for credit card fraud he was reportedly using a card that was not his and this arrest would void his probation..
So that mean he had to die
@@grasshopper7000
Yeah. That's what it means. F'ing idiot.
@@grasshopper7000 He stole the taser, ran, turned his torso back and fired taser at cop. It's a deadly weapon. townhall.com/tipsheet/bronsonstocking/2020/06/17/da-in-brooks-shooting-used-to-think-tasers-were-deadly-weapons-n2570858
kyussdemon1 I doesn’t matter on his background he shouldn’t have died
If he wrecked and killed your wife and kids I’m sure the first thing on your mind would be “but he’s a good guy”
Yet ppl don’t get shot for being drunk. And when they eventually do get sentenced, they do less and easier time
@@gangalee who got shot for being drunk?
@@gangalee Usually because they comply with police instead of tackle the police to the ground and try to steal their weapons. In this particular case as well, he was such a great guy that he probably just wanted to go home to beat the shit out of his wife and kid like the good old days. I suppose thats a step up from the usual abandonment of family seen in these communities though.
Exactly, got should’ve gotten an Uber in the first place
Joe is completely off on the Rashard case, how do you think people get killed drunk driving, peacefully?
Yeah my first thought, he was driving drunk and passed out while behind the wheel in the drive thru. That was when the police were called. TBH why would he not drive drunk the next day if he got a ticket.
He’s brainwashed too need to maintain order never let shit slide respect and be respected don’t get soft on em joe
Yes Joe please watch the entire police cameras
Sure go ahead and drive drunk, we’ll just call you an Uber and order some burgers.
No shit
“A zombified collective fighting a boogie man that they have created “ says it perfectly
TDS
Tdc
True
Damn, as a rogan fan I disagree about the Wendy's incident.
I think Joe was not genuinely making a case but rather paraphrasing things others have been saying.
What do you disagree about?
elev8tor guy rogan fans should disagree there’s way too many of us to not have productive conversations in disagreement
Many do! That cop was a fall guy.
I agree with you, the Wendy's incident didn't happen because of aggressive policing. The guy had driven the car drunk, was making zero sense, and his alibi just didn't add up. So logical step, let's bring him to the station let him simmer down, figure out what's up. The go to put him in cuffs, he fights. At what logical point can you justify someone grabbing a cops taser and shooting it at them in this incident? The cops were not at fault, and even still the cops were just trying to keep him and everyone else safe.
He saw the civil unrest coming? You mean like how 95% of the entire country saw it coming? Congrats my guy....
Sykout : No shit. The left has for the last decade been stoking this crap.
@@TheTora75
The Left *demonise half of the country as racist, then demonise whole country as inherently racist, destroy cultural artifacts, and with mob rule at that, support people who riot and loot*
People: "What's the fucks going on? Fuck you guys! If you don't stop, we'll stop you!"
Left: *Suprise pikkakhu face*
TheTora75 Yes the left has been framing all those right wing terrorists who are the number one threat to America.
Okay Charles Manson, relax
@@joefilter2923 What right wing terrorists? Wtf are you talking about?
Imagine thinking a cop should just call an uber for someone who is drunk driving.
Thats not the law though.
Brown privilege makes you believe that’s a possibility.
Read the above comment ^ for that imagination to become a reality right before your eyes.
Yeah .. and put it on the city's dime. Maybe they should have sent him home with some yummy Wendy's as well?
@Alexander Garrett Would you wrestle with a cop, pull their weapon, and point it at them? Think rationally. That's not a good ending.
I just learned more from this man in half an hour then I did in 10 years in school.
Fax 💯
Then you went to an awful school because what he says is common sense and obvious.
@@jameza6129 okaaaaay what u doing. Laughing at this dude cause he thought common scene would extend further out into schools. I mean we all had to think that thought at one point but I think it's more of surprise it's not more normalized but maybe that's just me
I can't even wrap my head around how f'd up the school system in your country must be then 😂 I feel sorry for you
DUI is a crime regardless of how polite the perpetrator is.
You don’t need to shoot them if they attempt to flee either
@@dropit7694 CNN didn't tell you how he was in jail for felony child abuse, or that he assaulted two cops and took a deadly weapon from one, or that he was shot only after he turned to fire said weapon at a police officer?
@@dropit7694 People armed with a taser who've committed violence against police and are trying to do everything in their power to avoid arrest are very dangerous. There are numerous stories of criminals on the run who have harmed and killed other people.
And I'm sure for some people, a relief that it is. There are enough drunks who can come off as the life of the party, but as soon as they get behind closed doors they turn into a 3rd round slugger. Their arrest may prevent some asshole from going home and beating the living shit out of their family. Even if just for a night.
@@dropit7694 - No, but an officer is justified to use deadly force against a subject who is resisting arrest and has a weapon capable of incapacitating the officer and that is what happened here. Both cops were charged by a politically motivated DA and they will be exonerated and the Mayor will be paying them a hefty civil settlement in civil court.
Joe "we should let a DUI offender go home and write him a ticket later" Rogan
These people are delusional. Theyve lived the good life to long and become soft in the head.
That ain't gonna happen.
Yea I mean what the actual fuck take is that. Joe was so wrong.
This was not Joe's finest moment. It was one "wtf" comment after another predicted upon his consumption of specific news, in this case left wing news of that event. To summarize; Joe sounded like an ill informed MORON in this clip
Only if the driver was on DMT.
I think you’re smart enough to look up the data, to see how many people die from drunk drivers...
30 people die every fucking day due to assholes who decide to get behind the wheel. many who are repeat offenders too.
@@Baghuul that makes me sad. 😥 I've never had a DUI, in the past I was a drunk walker. I've gotten three public intoxication charges
Soifthey did give him an uber home....Rashard would just say yeah I can keep driving drunk and the cops will just give me a ride home!....Until he kills a van load of children the next time.....that's what started MADD in the first place!
James Teague Giving him an Uber rude home is one of the dumbest ideas I have ever heard.
@@jamesteague9072 Joe gets naive or is playing devils advocate or he is just living in california too long.
He wasn’t a bad guy, just call him an Uber. He was operating a vehicle which can kill you as quick as a firearm. He was so drunk he passed out in a drive thru window. I think Mr. Rogan would have a very different opinion if he were personally affected by a drunk driver. Disgraceful! We have a rule of law, which all must follow or a civilized society will break down.
Maybe but sitting drunk in a stationery vehicle with engine off shouldnt be punished with death, especially if one wants to call itsekf a civilised country that is supposedly so much better than the rest of the planet! Or maybe thats what makes it so.
@@adeosinowo3197 I once slept in my car drunk one night as I needed to add extra parking early the following morning so I could leave it to pick up later in the following day.
I did sleep in the passenger seat and keep the keys out the ignition , though, and chose a car park with good CCTV to confirm I hadn't even tried to drive it should I get a knock, but thankfully had no issues
@@adeosinowo3197 he wasnt killed because he was driving drunk. he was killed because when they tried to arrest him for breaking the law and endangering people, he fought them
@@intoHeck1964 ahh ok, so the lesson here is: you deserve to die in cold blood if you challenge the law? And this is what makes your country the greatest on this planet & then by proxy the greatest in this solar system, heck why stop there? It must be the greatest country in the Galaxy!
I wish the cops called Uber for my DUI, but I was breaking the law so I went to jail. Cmon Joe.
And you sound like someone who understands they fucked up and put others at risk, not making excuses for yourself better after
right?? i was one block from my house and still got booked.....
Same here.
Wow nice one joe, ive payed thousands of dollars for my first dwi in NYC and you just want cops to drive this guy home lolololo joe u are out of your mind
All of you guys are right he was drunk and he should have went to jail. But he didn’t deserve to die that’s the point. Resisting arrest, assault on a police officer, DUI, all crimes and are arrest able offenses. However, it is not a death sentence you guys are missing the point
If you offer him an Uber for a dui you’re enabling people to drink and drive.
Lol. I was offered the same thing by a Maryland trooper. I was left go with a warning. Brooks was parked. Just saying. It happens cops do that all the time.
Like the police officer is going to arrest his buddy because he got the drunk guy an Uber? They murder people and show up to work the next day.
Ya Joe is out to lunch on Brooks situation. Here in Wisconsin where we have a huge drunk driving problem, the only thing that seems to effectively deter it is escalating the consequences. The police arresting drunk drivers is almost universally agreed on by the public.
If you give him a 5k dollar fine you arent enabling him
Daniel Alveo he was not ‘parked’. He was passed out in the driveway blocking other drivers that’s why the cops were called so they could move him.
"If BLM simply meant what those words imply, I'd be on board with it..... It doesn't"
Exactly. This guy is smart
Yep, it's a dismantling of America, of capitalism, of law and order in favor of some sort of marxist socialist nightmare where there is only one allowed system of thought.
Name a group of people where there aren't any idiot's.
Wwattz I don’t know of a single group that idolizes scum of the earth more than BLM. Every single “innocent good person” that they put at the forefront of their movement by idolizing then as martyrs, have an underlying story that isn’t told till weeks later. Oh that cop was a racist and hated black people, that’s why he knelt on his neck for 8 minutes... OOOR did they work TOGETHER AT ANOTHER JOB PREVIOUS TO THIS INCIDENT and have recorded confrontations with one another which led to this cop having a previous bias towards the guy? There is always another part of the story they don’t want people to hear. It’s just black vs white.
I respect him for realizing his past mistakes .. but he shares much of the blame for this situation as a liberal university professor. And he still claims to be "Progressive" but surely he simply means that as an adjective? The "Progressive Movement" seems to be everything he's currently complaining about. He senses that there is a much larger, invisible force that is running things .. but yet he says the ANTIFA and BLM buttheads are "leaderless". I'm confused. He is absolutely correct about our American values going down the crapper. I''m not sure what he means by we need "something" to correct for slavery. What does he think we need? We've tried special economic incentives, affirmative action, many programs dedicated to helping black people, we've voted black people into powerful positions, we've shopped at black-owned businesses. Nothing seems to make a difference. Now they are tearing down statues of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln, among others. And I have my browser even telling me .. "hey .. don't forget Black Lives Matter .. you white racist. And something about how we need to just listen" (Firefox) .. as if I needed a reminder and I haven't been listening? I'm sick of this and many others are. They are destroying this country. I say we need to hold everyone accountable for their actions and stop making excuses.
Joe, Brooks was drunk in a public place, in a drive-thru, and he was a great guy until he decided to be NOT be a great guy anymore and fought the police and took a taser which he fired at an officer which escalates the Use Of Force Continuum to deadly force. Brooks made that choice and he should be held accountable for that choice.
I'm not against police reform but you can't train a dog to do tricks and then beat it when it does what it's trained.
"He's not a bad guy" says Joe about the child abuser who was drunk driving.
Living in the shit hole he does rots your mind after a while.
Because he doesnt know about the criminal history. Because he doesnt take into account the fact that he stole a taser. Question is does he know, im guessing no which is why its not covered.
And who hit a cop, stole his taser and tried to use it on him. Seriously, I wish people would stop trying to make martyrs out of scumbags.
Because CNN didn't tell him and he's irresponsible with his power.
The cops name is Garrett Rolfe he has 12 complaints against him one of which is for improper use if his firearm. He has been charged with murder. THIS is your hero if so why? When he gets convicted and becomes a felon will you have as much contempt or will this felon be different. If you are for law and order then you should support the charges this is the same justice system that found Rayshard guilty or will it be different then. For many of you commenting this is absolutely about race and you absolutely are racists and you use alot of language and pretence to cover it up. I would be better if you stopped using law and order language and just say what you really mean. It has become increasingly clear even if you are still lying to yourselves.
As a black man I respect that they both know what they’re talking about, something that’s needed in today’s society. Too much Ig And TMZ etc etc ...social engineering is giving false power and knowledge that has very little to do with coming together as one regardless of race.
Your being black does not give you unique insights into what Joe Rogan and Guest know. Don’t be ridiculous. Playing the race card doesn’t work.
We need more nuanced discussion like this, we all have different opinions on this, if we can't talk about it then there will be civil war this is why I hate the left who tries to silence every voice of nuance.
@tech 52 Now that was a reply with "nuance"-- We don't know if you were serious or not. Nicely done.
"as a black man" "as a white man" "as a woman" "as a short person"
Why bother to identify with race at all? Its superficial.
You give it power with words, you're casting spells about what reality you are plucking out of infinite possibilities with self limiting beliefs and language. Racism ends as soon as we stop bringing it into existence by validating the construct with language that creates some illusion based difference between yourself and another entity.
As soon as people stop writing this script for themselves to follow we can all stop ourselves playing out this terrible identity politics based drama that will lead to further seperration and more hate based experiential outcomes..
If you ignore it it ceases to exist.
ALL HAIL SATAN which party do you connect with? I’m going the opposite way.
During the collapse of Yugoslavia in the absence of structured power after the war and atrocities. The power vacuum was filled by criminal gangs. Don’t destroy your country by letting go of rule of law.
@momentinpassing That just isn't true just look at what happened in CHAZ once there was no rule of law. Certain elements thought great lets take advantage and settle a few scores. People really need to take a good look at everything that played out there that's the future you will have if you pursue misguided ideals. It's not going to turn into a hippy festival the vacuum will be filled with those more brutal and better able to hold onto power. You want to see an unfairly stacked system just keep tugging at the threads.
@@Anotsu01 sooo.. we shouldn't arrest criminal bankers? So we shouldn't hold the police accountable? Why do you mention CHAZ?
Anotsu01 You didn’t refute his point. When have big bankers been thrown in jail for fraud and counterfeiting currencies?
Nino Carrion yes we should arrest anyone doing something illegal. Moment said there is one rule for one and another for the rich. I’m saying there is one rule for all under the law.
By all means arrest corrupt people in the finance sector, law enforcement doing anything illegal as well as arrest people smashing up businesses and trying to burn down court houses.
I mentioned CHAZ to show it as a microcosm of what will happen in the event of civil collapse drawing the parallel to the Yugoslav civil war. Why because I know people who were there as peace keepers, and people who had to flee their own country due to the rampant criminality.
Once there was no formal rule of law being enforced it was party time for those that would take advantage of that. Then the battle to regain rule of law is a process that would take decades.
There was 17,000+ murders in the first half of 2020 in Mexico due to gangs and a weak law system.
“What is The root cause? these are just symptoms” reminds me of rocky horror picture show 😂
I was a regular Frankie fan!
Drunk driving kills people Joe, it's kinda a big deal.
Apparently drunk sleeping does too late
@@TheCoolerChannel No but assaulting police officers and stealing their tazedr than firing that same stolen taser at them while resisting arrest sure will.
True but he wasn’t driving he was asleep. He should not be dead right now
@@rdot8658 he was asleep at the wheel of a running vehicle in a drive thru of a restaurant. In most states just being drunk in a car with the keys constitutes a DUI.
@@rdot8658 He drove to the Wendy's and fell asleep in the drive thru line he was so drunk. Its unfortunate hes dead but he should've handled it way differently.
"completely peaceful and compliant"
"escalated into a tussle"
someone hasn't bothered to watch the full video evidence
Yep. Thanks Joe for interrupting him with misinformation and stopping his train of good thought. Thanks.
I think he has watched the video and I think Joe is a CIA gatekeeper.
Even if he was a great guy with no priors. Tell M.A.D.D. that you let a drunk driver go free.
“Order me an Uber” where is the personal responsibility joe? He chose to drink and he chose to drive. If you’re a big boy, you can also do the responsible thing and get an Uber yourself, beforehand.
Freedom died a long time ago. Really have to arrest someone for that? And kill them? And people think North Korea is brutal. You people crave an authoritarian regime
@@fxmilitia1130 The rule of law is freedom. You should have the freedom to do what you want within the constraints of the law. When people break laws and arbitrarily get away with it, more people disrespect more laws. A breakdown of law and order is a loss of freedom. Society is when we trade some restrictions (minimum necessary laws) in exchange for other freedoms. Freedoms include safety and the ability to pursue prosperity via voluntary interactions with others. Are laws against drink driving necessary for public safety? Yes.
Yeah, last I checked, the cops don’t just call you a cab when you’re caught driving drunk.😂
Rogan is a moron
He gets ticketed and has to go to court, it's not just get an Uber and go home bye bye. Rogan has a point, the weight of the sanction matters much less than the propensity of getting one so long as there is some sort of balance.
If people were certain to get 500 USD fines for drunk driving, no one would do it. If 0.1% of them get caught and need to go 2 weeks in jail, people won't care.
You can argue that the rich then would not care because they can just pay, and you'd be right, so community service should be added to it.
Brett "I'm a leftist" Weinstein got the same thing right that every single conservative in America got right and is preeeettty proud of himself.
Who’s Brett Weinstein
Yeah I don't know wtf I would do if this guy I've never heard of didn't tell me what I already knew.
No kidding. It takes the most intelligent outliers of the "acedemic" community to see the patterns that everybody not in "acedemia" see immediately.
yeah, and he's still spouting systemic racism and white privilege
@@marcus8710 not surprisingly. The elite academia was certain the communist russia would surpass and last longer than the usa. One man out of a small college and joined the airforce, stated against all the intellects that the ussr would fall and it was a hell hole. Turns out that man was right and his name was ronald reagan. No marxist to this day applauds the ussr.
Anyone else getting the vibe that Joe probably drives drunk a lot?
Probably. But there is something to be said about how people are villainized for something that's rather subjective.
What is "drunk"? Is it .08 for everyone?
No. Some people at .08 aren't ganna have any problems. Whereas some are with even less alcohol. Before breathalyzers they would take you in if you were obviously drunk. When GW Bush got his you had to be absolutely slammered. Now, you're blind if you don't see how much it's about money and not public safety.
However, EVERYBODY knows you can't fight the cops so I have no sympathy for this particular character.
I live in Arizona, the strictest state in the union in regards to DUI's. Its ridiculously easy to get one. Do people still do it? Sure. But people just wanna go home. And people should be able to do so if there's no REAL reason to believe that they will cause an accident.
Giving up liberty for a false sense of security. But sure, it's all just to protect you...
david colley dude, he failed the sobriety tests and was clearly drunk out of his mind. It’s not that subjective, he fell asleep twice at the wheel
@@davidcolley4756 agreed but I'd say passing out in the drive-thru of a Wendy's is definitely drunk don't you think?
drunk and high from cocaine
"You're not a bad person who's gonna hurt someone"
That guy: *charged with child abuse*
Correction: That guy CONVICTED of child abuse.
This was the only time I think Joe was way off.
Yeah, smh on that one... someone driving behind the wheel intoxicated needs serious repercussions. Whether they’re arrested is one question, but to say that they should merely get a ticket isn’t severe enough imo.
Not a bad guy? Tell that to people who have lost loved ones to drunk drivers. Should have gotten an uber before.
L3f7S1d3 acquaintance of mine drove drunk, speeding down the street, and crashed into a man on his way home at night and killed him.
When a drunk driver hits and kills someone you love, you'll change your tune Joe.
Michael Valente yeah they get charged with involuntary man slaughter
@Michael Valente What's the percentage of drunk drivers/total drivers per day and sober drivers/total drivers per day?
Michael Valente what kind of backwards logic is that? Drunk driving is extremely reckless behavior. When you drink and drive you’re necessarily impaired and thus pose a significant threat to others. Sober drivers can easily be negligent or even reckless with their driving, and yes, kill others. but they’re not automatically impared from the get-go. It’s not the same level of risk.
@Michael Valente says the guy that has to blow into a machine to start his car 🤣
Michael Valente bro you’re an idiot. You can get charged with vehicular manslaughter if you kill someone in a car crash and it wasn’t a complete accident. And if you’re on your phone or something you do get charged with a crime. Because that shit is illegal.
I believe that the kids, at large, are living out the “Purge” fantasy. They are high on the ability to act out violently without repercussion. So, the movement is largely fueled by rage with almost no clear cause; violence through action equals lawless chaos.
Yes. Playing purge. Very much of this was that.
I don't even think rage plays in to it. "Without repercussion " is key. People do crazy shit when they are young , ignorant and have no repercussion
I was robbed by two teenagers yesterday. This comment resonates with me. They were acting with recklessness and no empathy or repercussions .
Maybe all the rage, resentment, and frustration that we are seeing lately has to do with the younger generations declining living standards, the fact that both major political parties and most politicians aren't responsive to the needs to their constituents, the fact that the cops are basically just a group of thugs who are paid by the government and given military grade weapons and gear, the fact that economic inequality is reaching unprecedented levels, etc. People feel disenfranchised and that nothing is being done to reform or correct this injustices. You can only keep ramping up the pressure inside a pressure cooker so long before it eventually explodes into anarchy, revolution or civil war.
Joe, brooks was passed out driving in the drivethru. He also abused his children and was on probation. You cant just send somebody home on an uber after a DUI.
I wish it was that easy! Made myself that mistake in 08, $17,000 dollars later.... it's a money grab.
He was accused and convicted of child cruelty or some such, but probably shouldn't parrot the claim that he actually abused his children unless you knew the family first-hand.
But that's irrelevant, which makes it seem like you're using past crimes to justify murder.
What's actually relevant: current law says drunk driving is a very serious criminal offense and does not allow cops to simply let a drunk driver go home or sleep it off in their car. If cops COULD let people off the hook for drunk driving they would do it a lot more often, dealing with drunks is not a fun time, but the general public insists that drunk driving is very serious since it keeps getting us killed in horrible car accidents.
@Offset SMH
I don't know who still needs to hear this, but cops aren't supposed to kill guilty people, either.
@W R sure it does if he gets arrested he goes back to prison he was out on probation.
The next time I am being arrested, I must try that... “Get me an Uber”. 😂😂😂
It's really at the cop's discretion
A drunk driver is not trying to hurt people? Really Joe Rogan? That's what you're going with?
Check MADD (Mother Against Drunk Driving) twitter feed. Crickets (except for all the comments wondering why they haven't mentioned it like they do all drunk driving cases)
Was he driving drunk or drunk and asleep in a drive thru... There's a huge difference,drunk driving can kill people but sleeping in a drive thru just pisses people off.
Drunk driving in itself is a victimless crime unless someone or something is damaged, hurt, or killed which is already a crime. We shouldn't drive drunk bc it's stupid and dangerous but lots of legal things are stupid and dangerous. No victim = no crime should be the basis for all law. Going away from this is going toward fascism and away from autonomy and freedom even if it makes the world less safe. The amount of damage/income destruction and cost due to DUI laws are far more damaging overall then the relatively few tragic accidents caused by it. It manufactures criminals in order for a false sense of safety with little actual safety created compared to the negative effects created. Fines and loss of license? Sure. Jail time? That's just excessive.
Aww someones whiteness is hurt
He was sleep in the car & either way the police are to detain not kill. Black people are mad because our tax dollars pay for police who don't detain so you Can have a day in court...you just "magically" end up dead & we talking old,young,men,women & children
Asking to be let go after getting caught doing something that kills thousands of people, drinking and driving, is ridiculous.
Oh, he asked for an uber! We better let him go, then! 💩
Joe "why are the cops here, I'm just a drunk guy passed out drunk at a drive thru" rogan.
Comon who hasn't passed out drunk at a drive thru??
Just ban alcohol and then we won’t have drunk drivers who might either kill someone in an accident or get killed by the cops for being passed out in a drive through. Simple fix just like banning guns to prevent mass shooters.
fernando guevara are you joking right?
@@fernandog806 hope to God you're joking.
@@tatebarrick9961 you think gun bans work? If you do, the joke went over your head. If you dont, the joke still went over your head
Joe Rogan sets Mothers Against Drunk Driving back 40 years. Zero tolerance for the drunks that have killed so many people.
Joe is letting his emotions get in the way!
Most drunk drivers don't kill people.
The new anti drunk driving slogan .. "Zero Tolerance .. unless you're black".
@@JohnMiller-cq2fw Most people driving around with unregistered AK-47s probably don't kill people either. Should we just not worry about it then? Your argument is ridiculous.
@@Hellserch He was driving a car. What the hell difference does that make?
Joe "Drunk driving is not that bad" Rogan
Tell that to my 3 dead friends.
@@andrewthomas5769 I'd rather have one cool guy that is man enough to drive a car while at 4+ alcohol perthousand blood than any of your kind. Spoiled, yelling, selfish, no idea what dignity means.
TheSphongleface what the hell
@@ryunz9639 Yep, the new generation is utter useless.
TheSphongleface I don't believe he's taking your side
I don't believe I have ever heard a more ignorant conversation in my life.
ditto. both of them are dead wrong
Try to be more specific
T J Would you care to elaborate? A lot is covered in 24 minutes lol which conclusion are they dead wrong about? All of them?
One conclusion which is drawn is that our current system facilitates continued suffering. So if one generation of a family is suffering, the odds are great that the following generation of that family will suffer too. Are they “dead wrong” about that? In other words, do you think upward mobility is made EASIER by our current set of laws?
I see again people that don't understand policing and need to back them 100 percent. When someone resist arrest they are putting the officers life at risk. The incident in Atlanta could have been avoided simply by the criminal copying with the officer. If the officer didn't arrest him and he drove off and killed someone the officer himself would be in trouble. These police experts need to shut up period about policing unless they have actually done it. That means Joe Rogan is absolutely pandering to the left.
Joe...Joe..you don't get out of a DUI by saying "Call me an Uber."
I've never been more sure Joe Rogan regularly drives drunk and gets off for being famous in my life.
Sempi10 that was really the dumbest shit I’ve heard from someone mouth . My uncle was killed by drunk driver while working on the road
Joe, the police were called because the employees at Wendy's just like many places have policies not to engage customers in such situations.
I think what certain places (I believe places like LA) want to implement is a community solution - have a community "guard" to approach nonaggressive, nonviolent criminals and solve the issue at hand.
I disagree with the approach, but it's what Joe was advocating
redwall1521 if they act like that with the cops they will with anyone
Don't think Rogan has gotten take-out in a long time
The actual policy is to ignore and let them go about their day. Lmfao
@@redwall1521 shut up
Rayshard Brooks was on parole so in violation of his parole they had to arrest him. Letting him go defeats the purpose of having conditions for those on parole
EDIT: I'm not arguing whether or not they should have shot Rayshard Brooks. I'm arguing against Joe Rogan's point that they should have called him an Uber or taken him home. If you watch the body cam footage, the officer gave Brooks the benefit of the doubt initially (asked him if he just had a long day and fell asleep while waiting) and asked Brooks to just pull over and park to sleep. But when Brooks fell back asleep in the drive thru line, the officer began to have his suspicions because he smelled alcohol and noticed that Brooks had a glossy eyes. That's why the officer ended up asking for his license and registration and calling another officer. Brooks got out of the vehicle a couple of times and the officer told him nicely to get back into his vehicle. Once they found out that Brooks was on parole AND that he was driving under the influence after Brooks failed a field sobriety test, they had to follow protocol and arrest him. Right when they told him he was going to be arrested, that's when Brooks began to resist. I find it ridiculous that people want to argue that police don't know how to do their jobs and once they begin to do it right, people want them to break the rules and not follow protocol. The argument of whether or not they should have shot him is a separate argument because the circumstances changed once he began resisting and grabbed the officer's taser.
Shot in the back while running. Just saying.
Ok boot licker.
@@Etatdesiege1979 Did you not watch the video where he, while running, shot the officer behind him with the taser? Did you miss the part where he punched the cops head against the ground?
I honestly can't imagine how people are dumb enough that they can't imagine a scenario where shooting someone in the back is necessary to save your own life or the life of others.
So he deserves to get judged and executed????stfu
Pete Gallardo yep and they killed him
When you say “mark Lamont hill made a good point”, I shut you off.
Joe should try make that ‘nothing wrong’ argument with the parents of everyone killed by a drunk driver.
Also, a DUI arrest isn't a 'go to jail' offense for most people. They arrest you, process you, and usually release you the same night. Rayshard's problem was that he was on probation (he was released due to COVID-19) and a DUI arrest on probation means his probation would probably be revoked and he somehow thought fighting the cops would solve that problem.
Exactly. I had a DUI and I was very nice a cooperative during the process. It cost me a lot of money but it made me a better man.
Amen, its against the the law to drive drunk. "Who called the cops on him"? Really joe? He was past out in a drive thru if maybe knowone calls the authorities maybe he drives and kills someone. Thats why. And as cordial as he was so were the police in this case. Take your medicine if you fuck up, and he wasnst a saint just got of jail wit this pity party america is in right now.
He was compliant and had no problem with getting an Uber. If every drunk person would be arrested, Dublin would be empty.
exactly!
He was so drunk he passed out in a Wendy's drive thru and joe wants to call him an uber ha ha ha ha wtf come on man.
Those lines can get pretty long
Thank his he passed out in the driveway before he killed or injured someone on the way home.
Joe loves to dance on the fence when a situation involves a POC. He has to dance to the music until that Spotify paycheck starts kicking in, god forbid he gets deMANEYtized by UA-cam
Exactly, this episode contained the biggest bullshit I’ve heard recently
Atlanta has an excellent transit system. No reason to ever drive drunk, MARTA is Smarta
It's chilling when the old school liberal is the more reasonable voice in this conversation.
It's a form of linguistic programming. NPR uses this form of communication effectively. This is the way people "Program" others to do their bidding .. by speaking in a calming manner.
@dennis Woodbury. Please consider opening up your mind a bit. Everything an “old school liberal” says isn’t wrong just because you’ve classified them in that realm. There is something to be said for experience!
He's a soft Marxist Professor
The word "liberal" means something different these last few years. I'm still not sure what Americans mean when they say "liberal".
Unlike CommieJoe who tries to push the Marxist agenda, Bret has been trained in logic and reasoning
The idea that a drunk driver is just a nice guy who made a little mistake is a very dangerious one, as is the notion that skin color should be seen as a factor. If the policy across the country was "be nice, de-escalate, call a rideshare, we would see a major increase in fatalities, much like we are seeing with retail theft.
Clearly Joe has not yet lost someone to drunk driving.
@@squidious1662 -- No its not their job but I think Joe's point is that maybe that it might be better if that particular act of social service should be built into their job.
Which of the two scenarios is preferred? The officers call an Uber, the three men continue to exchange cordial banter until the Uber arrives and then it takes him home. The other scenario ends with him getting shot in the back. Is there a third option?
That said, my sense is that I'm actually more on your side ... i.e., the cops side. The cardinal rule, in my opinion, for police on citizen interactions should be that the citizen is required to obey an officer's lawful command!!
I'm furious that the media and the democrats are not crying out with passion for the looting to stop. I'm furious with the health experts who are suddenly saying that it's OK to line the streets by the thousands and breath down each other's neck. I'm perplexed at the notion that the American flag has become a symbol of inequality and oppression. I don't get it.
What gives me some comfort is that some progressive intellectuals are addressing the ludicrousy of the thinking of the revolutionaries. Weisenstein does a good job here. Sam Harris did do on his podcast. Sorry for rambling.
so shoot on sight anyone driving drunk?
@@emptyforrest Stupid comment. He resisted arrest, punched a cop, stole his taser, fled, then turned and shot the stolen taser at the cop. Nice try though.
@@squidious1662 so people should die for falling asleep in there car drunk?
@Vladimir Peter I think people need to understand drunk driving killing people is way more of a problem then dying at the hands of police.
Lets take 2018 - "there were 10,511 fatalities in motor
vehicle traffic crashes in which at least one driver had a BAC of .08 g/dL or higher" - crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812864
Now take a guess how many people died to police in 2018. How about 403 - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_killings_by_law_enforcement_officers_in_the_United_States
Joe cant be serious, the cops are gonna call you an Uber if you're driving drunk? WTF
I used to drive with Uber and Lyft there was an occasion I had to pick up a guy from Waffle House and when I arrived it was two police officers who had ordered a ride for a drunk guy
Seems Joe may have smoked one too many.
Actually police do call uber for drunk people.
It’s a felony in many parts. You don’t call cabs for felons to be taken home.
I can’t even believe he said that! Tell that to the family members who is dead because of a drunk driver.
Drunk: "please call me an Uber"
Police: "ok anuber, put your hands behind your back."
Alright, that was pretty funny
Yeah that got me
Gold
Dad cops
loooool
A drunk driver is a bad person, ask my best friend’s dead wife and infant daughter.
Joe...he resisted arrest bc he was violating his parole for child/domestic abuse...send the drunk guy home for him to take it out on his family
He lost me when he said that.
To add something (and I don't know if this is true or not) but I read that he actually drove to Wendy's drunk and fell asleep in his car in the drive through and that is why police were called in the first place. Again, I can't confirm this other than the article I read. If I can find it again, I'll try to post a link here.
Ok. I found a few articles confirming what I read. He was passed out drunk in his car blocking the Wendy's drive-thru.
Damn Joe, I usually agree with you, but a program to call a freaking Uber. Do you know how many innocent people are killed by drunk drivers every year. Damn that was dumb!!!
agreed
He didn’t say he was in favour of drunk driving. He said he’s in favour of allocating the police to serious crime with alternatives for non immediate threats.
@@dicerevo Someone drunk behind the wheel of a 5000 pound vehicle is an immediate threat. Cops should not be tasked with taking responsibility for other people's bad decisions. You are responsible for your own decisions. Every day, almost 30 people in the United States die in drunk-driving crashes - that's one person every 50 minutes. If you decide to drive while drunk you not deserve a free uber to get you home. You deserve to be punished.
@@dicerevo *Drink driving ISN'T an immediate threat…???*
When I was 5 a drunk driver plowed into my friends, as they stood right next to me, at 40 MPH! He literally almost killed them! So maybe we have much different opinions on how to treat drunk drivers.
I thought I was the only one thinking this
Imagine thinking someone passed out drunk in their running car shouldn't be arrested.
That then attacks and beats up two cops and tries to tase another.
G
wowua-cam.com/video/oT6aLBBRhGA/v-deo.html
Also forget the taser even -punch an officer in the head, pretty much any country in the world you're in deeeep shit
John Scott John Scott has obviously never been to any other first world country
Rogan has been in one to many fights. Its that, or maybe devils weed does damage the brain.
“Democracy cannot succeed unless those who express their opinions are willing to choose wisely. The real safeguard of democracy is education.” FDR
He definitely looked friendly and "peaceful" when he punched those officers and shot a taser at one. This was clearly the model citizen we would want to call an Uber for.
Better yet, why not hire Mr. Brooks to BE your Uber driver?? Call him to pick up Joe... Lmaoo
He was being considerate and peaceful because he was trying to get out of the charges
Yup Joe is way off base.
And let’s make it a taxpayer funded program. No point in doing things half way.
Y C He assaulted the cops, then stole the taser and tried to shoot one of the cops in the face with it. You’re too stupid for this conversation. Stfu and go outside and play.
Rayshard was on parole and DUI was a violation.
Calico Bill and?
What does this add to the convention?
@@Camoutlaw That is why he resisted. He didn't want to go back to jail.
Cam Outlaw and what? It was a fact that he was pointing out lmao😂😂😂
Calico Bill
Exactly
“He was a good guy” out on parole for beating his wife and kids
I know, right? And as if the wife and child abuse wasn't enough, he got behind the wheel of a car intoxicated and then tried to taser a police officer.
@@ellenkh4422 are you ready to accept the new normal?
Is that so bad?
After also ALLOWING them to LIVE, AND FEEDING them?
TheSphongleface Just because they didn’t die, that doesn’t make what he did any less wrong. He still beat his wife and kids.
@@TheSphongleface what to do youmean by allowing them to live and feeding them?
Don't be a dummy, drunk driving applies to all of us.
Wasn't Rayshard Brooks caught asleep drunk in the Wendy's drive-thru which is why the cops were called? He admitted to the cops he had been drinking. That qualifies as DUI in any jurisdiction. The police were rightfully called and had every right to arrest him because of it.
He did not deserve to die
Dylann Roof
@@rdot8658 he wouldn't have had he complied with the officers instead of punching the officer and then taking his Tazer and pointing it at the officer and firing it
@@rdot8658 he fought two cops took there taser shot one of them with it and ran off blind firing with it drunk i really dont know what to tell you
Sota Pop Brooks passed out drunk in the drive thru of the Wendy’s. How do you think he ended up in the drive-thru in his car? Also, you’re wrong about Georgia Law. You can be found guilty of DUI including: “Warm hood of the car, which also suggests the car was driven recently” and many other signs. You’re the moron.
Joe man, drunk behind the wheel and we’re gonna get him an Uber?! Haha let’s throw it all the way back to the early 80s and just pour the beer out and tell him to drive himself home
What if he never killed anyone? What if he got caught by himself alone right after he left?
I think we're advanced enough as a fucking nation to tow his car, make him pay a FAT fine, uber his ass home.
Why waste 3 years of resources and not adress his initial problem when we can attacj the source of drunk driving and facilitate more rational responses to ALL infractions.
@@dm3402 Because the harsh punishment for drunk driving is deterrent to prevent drunk drivers. Do you realize that every 50 minutes someone gets killed by a drunk driver? It's more serious than you seem to realize.
That was so misleading he was in the drive thru passed out drunk, it was his 2nd DUI so he already had that warning not to do it and also he was on parole for child abuse so idk what I missed he started going crazy when they told him he was under arrest. Did they get to joe or is joe not fully informed?🤔
@@stonnergaming420Yeah nvm idek now that ive seen the vid. People have to not drink and drive.
@@QarthCEO Except harsh punishment isn't deterring tens of thousands of drunk driving cases. It's clearly not the solution.
Joe “DUI’s aren’t a big deal” Rogan
Joe, tell that to MADD
Perhaps the stupidest thing Joe has ever said. If you give someone a ride every time they are caught DUI then they will do it again and again until they hurt someone.
He says that until his family gets killed by a drunk driver, kinda bull shit joe defended a drunk driver but what ever.
I was surprised to hear Joe say this as well. Just call him an Uber, no harm done? Maybe this time. What about the next time? DUI punishments are harsh for a reason.
Yeah he's wrong on them not being a big deal, they fucking are, obviously. From what I understand though it was a bad kill. Why didn't they kill the fuck who hit my friends brother on his bicycle doing 120k in a 60 zone, why didn't they kill him after he got caught again six months later... Not the smartest thing he's said but I get what he was saying. That guy didn't need to die, he just fucked up.
Not arresting drunk drivers and sending them to bed with a ticket is the dumbest idea ever lol. People have 10+ DWI’s, nobody cares about a ticket
the guy was drunk joe....a drunk driver killed my sister and you want me to agree that the cops should just pull them over and call an uber......no lesson learned with that...stiff punishment is the only deterrent
Well he drove to a Wendy's and slept in his car. Sorry for ur sister but he doesn't deserve to die
@@eliudnjai he passed out in the fucken drive thru line lmao
@@eliudnjai Correction, he DRUNK drove to a Wendy's. Who tf is talking about dying and killing? You arrest people who commit a crime (DUI).
@@eliudnjai well lets see he punched both officers in the face took there taser ran and started firing of the taser at the officer while running which could of killed the officer if it hit him in the right place i have no pity also he said he was gonna go "a couple minuets down the road" as well
@@jrtakesthesky27 thank you
Joe “don’t charge people with DUI’s” Rogan
*Then don't attack police officers and fire their own weapons at them.*
*If you did that to me, I'D SHOOT YOU*
Killukwik you should be so ashamed of yourself.
@Killukwik They didn't kill a drunk driver, they killed a man who assaulted police
He sort of missed the boat on that one... I suspect he was kicking himself right after getting off the air and thinking through what he said.
Stu Saville they shot a man running away... good cop training right?
I lost it when Joe said Rayshard was compliant
I’d hate to see his definition of fighting and resisting
Also what just call him an Uber? So it's OK if I drive hammered and pass out behind the wheel? I'm white and I live in Canada and I promise you as sure as the sky is blue the cops are dragging my drunk ass to jail if I do that
Yea, he implied that Rayshard was harmless but nobody who is impaired while driving is harmless. If he would've driven his car into Joe's family then Joe would be singing a different tune today and frankly it's a slap in the face to anyone who has lost a loved one to a drunk driver. Oh, or yea we can just call Rayshard an Uber so he can possibly throw up in their back seat or worse... put them in danger. Raise your hand if you would trust a drunk ex convict stranger who did time for violent crimes in the back seat of your car.
@Ashwin Varghese oh ok, so they should have let him run wild through the neighborhood with a taser in his hand? Or should they have let him shoot one of them with a taser? Which scenario makes more sense to you?
@Ashwin Varghese Except he wasn't shot for being drunk. He was shot for grabbing a cops weapon out of its holster and then running for cover. Truly not hard to figure that one out. Cop better get off.
I believe it in big part the privatization of the prison system. That’s where people should be focusing their attention.
Joe “drunk drivers don’t kill people” Rogan
MickyAvStickyHands he should watch the 1980’s videos they made us watch in grade school about drunk driving.
He was a Joe "peaceful person" Rogan lol
He could have crashed into people while driving drunk to the fast food place. That should be an automatic arrest by itself.
D W it is! That’s why he had to go into custody 👌🏽
@@yankees29
As well as the fried egg in a pan saying this is your brain on drugs.
Anybody remember Bill Hicks. LOL!
ua-cam.com/video/5T4XBwALPi0/v-deo.html
Joe "Drunk Driving and shooting a taser at a cop is peacefull" Rogan
Yes why does Joe choose to leave that detail out?
he was out on parol and violating it and had multiple priors, he was supposed to be arrested automatically
to be fair, that's just Tuesday for Joe
@@johnsmith9731 No he was just being "peaceful" come on now, let him take an uber home. Drunk driving should be like it was in the 1960s, just a warning. Also, if you shoot a taser at a cop they should just accept that. It's peaceful remember.
@@Hellserch
Is it? You have no idea what you are about to step in. You are very foolish
I think Joe's tone would be totally different if a drink driver had killed one of his family members
People in my country are not protesting because we do not have here these "humans" in our coutry and therefore we live in peace. Closed borders save lives.
Hey Joe Rogan I’m a big fan and I also love hearing different perspectives and opinions on solutions on how we can do police reform. I would like to hear from maybe one of the leaders in the organization of the black lives better move it and share some facts on your show on what they’re doing and why they’re doing it
If one of my family members was fighting with the cops like that and stole a taser, I would expect you to shoot their dumb ass!!! You sensitive ass people.
YES
Joe's either totally uninformed/misinformed about that incident, or he's simply a moron. The cops were more than respectful and tried to reason with that guy for over an hour. He was passed out drunk in a drive-thru with his car running. When they confirmed he was DUI and tried to place him under arrest, he attacked them and tried to use a tazer against an officer. They did what they are legally obliged to do in that situation. He was not a victim of brutality. He was a moron who play a stupid game and won a stupid prize.
The problem is neoliberalism
Lou Mota 100%
"A zombified collective fighting a bogyman they have invented." Perfect quote.
Agreed, summarizes Trump's voter base perfectly . And if a democrat was in power it would be the same horseshit.
@@patrickdolan2876 - I think the bogyman would be all white heterosexual males. The democrats are not much better, if at all.
My takeaway from this is that Joe drives drunk or high sometimes. Didn't he have a huge argument with Steven Crowder about how driving under the effects of weed was fine?
I guess it depends on the person. Driving impaired under any kind of drug is bad, even caffeine. There's prescriptions out there that clearly state not to operate machinery. Joe doesn't know what he's talking about and if you get pulled over reeking of weed they'll bust you for that even if it's legal to smoke.
Driving 40 mph on the interstate is just as dangerous for the public as driving 100. Change my mind!
@@sleazyfellow Weed is not as bad for driving as alcohol but it's still much worse than being sober.
Because it is fine.
@@Pyryp2 depends on the person. I can drive drunk way better than i can drive high.
Joe, that's not how drunk driving works.
Joes talking shite as usual.
go ahead and walk home. the cops the leave. he sneaks back and drives off. this time in a rush and even more prone to have accident. tell that to the MADD groups that forced jail time and automatic arrest for BAC levels that keep dropping over the decades.
Ricky Parmar Again, that’s not how drunk driving works.
Joes saying if a drunk hit someone he loves take him out and talk to him call him a Uber. Cars are not deadly they are made of cotton candy. lol
Wow, Joe’s take on what they should’ve done with Rayshard Brooks is possibly the dumbest thing I’ve heard him say.
They called the cops because he was passed out with his car parked IN THE DRIVE THRU holding up customers. Something was clearly wrong.
They called the cops because he was passed out with his car parked IN THE DRIVE THRU holding up customers. Something was clearly wrong
Either way, the cops handled the situation poorly. It's just a passed out guy, why even act aggressive?
I did that once 2 years ago. Police came & told me to pull my car to the side and sleep it off.
I didn't die.
That's the problem. I would've been dead had I been black.
Rooster Cog oh wait you wrestled a cop and took his taser and didn’t die too?
h obs go watch the 43 minute body cam footage
Easily your dumbest moment Joe - massively disappointed.
The problem is people are dying off bs like falling asleep in a drive thru. The fact of the matter is if those police officers pulled up without guns and knew how to handle themselves physically. That man would still be alive ... his life mattered. Joe understands that and that is what we should be focused on
@@rdot8658 He did not "fall asleep" at a drive thru. He was passed out drunk at a drive thru, then physically assaulted two police officers, stole their weapon and fired it at them. How is that anywhere close to "falling asleep"?
Ryan Simmonds to be fair Ryan, like you said if the officers never arrived with guns the man would be alive. However, at the point of the shooting he was aiming a taser at an officer. The same justice department that labeled a taser as a LETHAL weapon (another debate) labels this shooting as a felony murder. Please show me an example where defending yourself against a deadly weapon would be murder. You’re correct, if the officers never had guns, one man wouldn’t have died, but if that same man simply complied, no deaths would have come from this run in with the police. Joe’s idea is absolutely incredible and perhaps we should have different types of policing for different types of crimes, but there will always be belligerence against the system, so no matter how peaceful the crime, there is no way to guarantee the safety of the officer without a gun. The real answer is raising physical standards so that ALL officers can physically overpower anyone they come in contact with so that guns are only needed against other deadly weapons.
Kaz Canning understood ... did he deserve to die ? I’ve seen multiple videos Of white dudes doing worse shit and not getting gunned down on the spot. They need to be better at their jobs so regular altercations do not turn into murders
Cole Nelson yea I agree man. We need police reform.
Joe you are wrong he could of killed someone if they let him leave.
joe DUI kills
Dude anyone can kill someone. There are millions of drunk people all over the world every day, and we all know that alcohol increases the chances of all sorts of violence but we don't have police supervision for every drunk. Now if they did find another way to get him somewhere safe without violence or the threat of violence, everything would be just fine.
@@seanjones4726 Dude if they let him go he'll do it again and again and again worse and worse and worse until finally.... Can you guess?
@@buyerofsorts ah yes and clearly the method we have currently for dealing with drunk drivers saves lives
Do drunk drivers get the death penalty?
This man blows my mind..Gonna listen to more of what he has to say it makes so much sense it's cathartic..
Man, i've seen videos where that guy rocked 2 cops and then stole their taser. You can say they shouldn't have shot him dead, but you can't say that man was compliant.
The cops were nice as possible
@@kris3451 right. until he didn't get that uber get out of jail free card he was asking for. same statement
Why do they keep showing this Biden ad: “I’m coming to you for to ask a quick favor”. Seriously that’s the best take they had? Smfh.
THANK YOU - I literally thought the same thing. Imagine what the other takes sounded like!
Thank you! I've been saying this since they rolled it out. The scary part is, that was their best take. That was the best they could get him to perform. 😬
Rogan had something to do with that lol
@@evildead311 If he did that would be badass!! hhehe
I PRAY for a live televised debate : Biden vs. Trump!
Gotta disagree w Joe here. It’s not “just” guy got drunk and drove. We can’t downplay the deaths by drunks to placate Raychards death.
He didn't kill anyone.
blacksuite1 so by your logic, we should wait until he does?
@@StormTrysail we can't downplay raychards death to placate deaths by drunks.
Was he not out on parole?
@@blacksuite1 No one's saying that he should have died, but his death was due to his choices. The theoretical person/people he could have killed driving drunk would not have been due to their decisions.
I don't agree with you Joe.
It is not "brutal policing", it is brutal criminals.
I completely support the police, not the brutal criminals.
this guest makes an intelligent point that everything that is happening is a symptom of our economic/political system and everyone ignores that to attack joe on a bad point that the guest immediately glossed over. this chat is a perfect example of the guests point.
^ freaking this
The man who is famous for standing up to BS just made an excuse for spotify money..we all know that the system is in a death thrall that's why we are here in the first place
Beat me to it. Feeble minded people so easily divided.
Based, it actually frustrates me as the comment on the drunk driver thing was clearly not the point of this video
I agree with you but it was just a horrible take and sticks out like a sore thumb.
JOE It’s ok to get drunk, drive, and fall asleep in a drive through, as long as you’re polite ROGAN
6:35 - A non-violent person out on parole for felony violence? 🙄 Come on Joe, stop listening to Mark L Hill for starters.
Tbh I understand why this person should get arrested but I still do think they should prosecute people for drug use and dealing (only if there driving and causing a danger) and that if someone is driving they should try to either impound there car or make someone else in the car drive the car instead of the person intoxicated.
Everyone is so skilled with bringing up someone’s past in these cases, but get amnesia when the violent history of this country is mentioned.
Johnny Hammersticks not really a lot of the problems with illegal drugs and a lot of deaths behind them are because of them being illegal I would say most drug deaths would drop if they Juss controlled these substances more
Brandon Campbell - Because the acts he commit we’re done directly by him, not more than a few years ago. Blaming an entire people group for things done by other people generations ago, all that are no longer alive, is a textbook definition of racism. My family was not even in America during the time of slavery, some of them where the victims of racism.
Basics: Term limits. Accountability. Constitutionality. Both parties need to be brought to justice.
You kind of take away from every single person who has lost a daughter, mother, brother.. a son.. to a drunk driver, that's why its illegal, that's why they arrest people doing so.
That’s a separate issue.
@@demiansims728 How is it a separate issue??
@@demiansims728 when a drunk driver kills someone in your family I hope you recall your stupid remark here.
Joe: What are your next predictions?
Bret: Well, uh, we're on a collision course with history.
Thanks, Nostradamus.
this just in: history keeps happening
Bret is a bozo, he can’t let go of his bias against republicans, conservatives, and trump because of his perception that “they are the party of big business and don’t care about the people” from 40 years ago.... yeah right when the democrats have been advocating for gun control for almost 100 years now
The future ain't here... but it's comin'.
Sick selfie bro
@@DaManBearPig lmao
Yeah I was going to finish this until Joe started talking about letting drunk drivers take an Uber home after they've been found drunk and asleep in the drive-thru...🙄
...while on parole for child abuse. Which is, being on parole, an automatic rearrest.
Was the guy in the Drive Thru lane?
Exactly wtf it's harmless until he fucking drives drunk on the wrong side of the freeway and kills Joe's family, I can't believe he justifys the guys behavior.
Clearly not Joe's greatest moment. Too much floating around in a dark pool and weed has fried his common sense portion of his brain.
Not more funding, better project management. Proper allocation of funding.