My uncle was stationed in the pentagon on 911, his office was in the wing that was hit. He told me the wing was under maintenance and was empty when it was hit. He was in an outside office building when it happened. Sus.
why is it sus; E-Wedge was being rebuilt for years before 911. I spent a year in there prior to 911 putting up steel for new mechanical towers and elevator shafts
So much irrefutable evidence against a plane hitting the Pentagon. Several videos showing footage of a cruise missile flying towards the Pentagon on the day. The engine at the "crash" site was the wrong type for the plane that supposedly hit it. Every expert pilot ever interviewed about it saying it was completely impossible to fly a plane that low and not hit any of the lampposts on the way in. A complete la la fantasy.
It's not that incredible considering the broadcast was 325 lines at 10fps. Radio waves travel perpetually in space, so the 234,000 miles is nothing compared to Voyager 1's 14 billion miles, which is still broadcasting a signal back to Earth but with a 22+ hr delay. The delay from the moon and back is only 1.33 seconds.
@@pumaraebon80 Different radio frequencies and amplitudes. The signal from the moon was very low frequency and very high amplitude. Many times greater than the weak signal we get to our phones. You can complain to your service provider and they will be more likely to install a tower closer to your house, which may be more exposed to your master bedroom.
@@efficiencyinavanYeah but that just makes it all the easier to fake. Easy explanations and answers for the people. Why spend 26 bill creating a mission that might fail miserably and embarrass your nation in a time of competition, when you can spend 1 Bill or less just faking it.
@@javiii8337 sorry flat earth is absolutely one of them. Eddie is a fucking idiot but that doesn't discredit that the earth is flat. There's way too many government documents that admit it's flat, no curvature measured... Boats don't go over a curve when you can zoom in with a camera and they come back into view. This was the biggest round earth defense for centuries and now anyone with a camera with decent zoom can prove it wrong but nobody cares cuz they're all brainwashed like you bro. You see where Joe Rogan talks with others about flat earth, just says there all stupid and retarded over and over but no science to back his shit... Your god Joe Rogan wants you to feel retarded if you even question the globe, the dumb pos sold his soul to the devil long ago, uses his all seeing eye symbol as well. Idiots gather in giant crowds, turns out Joe has a bigger crowd than CNN. Y'all are fucking idiots and fell for the trump scam too lol
You’re telling me that we had the technology back in the 60s and 70s. Then lost all technology we used and have never been back since. We’ve never left the atmosphere!!
7:00 lmao what a load of bullshit, talk about believing in stupid conspiracies. They probably locked them in a cage with a bear and and eagle when they caught them stuffing diamonds inside their lower end 😂😂😂
@@alainportant6412 took me about 5 minutes to confirm this “conspiracy”… Von Braun used prisoners from the Dora-Mittelbau concentration camp for labor. They were regularly worked to death and publicly executed
Tons of interesting guests since then, you just gotta pick and choice. I skip all the MMA live shows, and I only watch the comedian guests when I want pure laughs and bs.
@@ActionJackson669 joe was a lot more relaxed then and he actually had civil arguements and would go at people when they were false. Now he agrees with every single body that goes on.
No I used to wonder about the same thing but in reality there's just so many episodes that the interesting ones become more scarce. When he only had so many episodes it made the 2 with Alex Jones, the alien shit, Elon Musk and conspiracy episodes etc more common. Now the 3rd time around with Alex etc is surrounded with 1500 plain podcasts.
I cant believe the amount of times I've heard Joe explain operation paperclip and that theres still people who have never heard about it. I learned about it when I was like 9 years old only cause I was interested in WW2 massively at the age. But just goes to show, you dont even need to be into conspiracies to have heard about it lol.
The reason it isn’t taught is because that’s something the US doesn’t want people to know. They want us to believe everything made and done was by Americans. What good is it if the greatest feat by mankind was aided by Nazis
@@koreywilliams8418 that’s why I find it hilarious the fake moon landing conspiracy theorists always leave out the fact we even got to the moon was because Nazis helped us out and USSR Nazis backed it up that we landed on the moon lol
@@97NikeSb That's because nobody has ever gone to the moon, smart guy ! You should watch the video where the head guy at NASA says that we haven't gone back to the moon because we don't have the technology. You could ask to see the video footage of the moon landing that according to NASA was recorded over and that they habe absolutely no footage, pictures, voice recordings. You can watch them grab wires when they are supposedly on the spaceship floating in space. Go watch the valuetainment podcast with the dude who has footage that says "Do not release to public" and basically proves that it is bullshit. You do absolutely no research, fill in the blank parts of a story with your imagination and believe it to be 100% facts.
I’m telling you, Joe, that was a tomahawk cruise missile, the hole was not even big enough for a fuselage. There was no wings no engines no seats no luggage just tomahawk cruise missile pieces.
No sign of burn on the grass, it came in low. Also I was watching this live and Jamie McIntyre with CNN was interviewing someone at the Pentagon and he raced around the building with his cameraman and there was NO debris whatsoever. Tiny hole and no damage from the wings. This makes me so mad. And what they did to Jamie.
NASA is the protective layer to the truth. In 2007, when Google announced a 34 million dollar reward* for any private organization to send a rover to the Moon and live broadcast the Apollo landing sites, why do you think NASA immediately made the landing zones a restricted area? Do you really think it was to "preserve history"? No, they were more likely protecting the truth. *30m for landing on Moon, and an additional 4m for live recording the Apollo landing sites.
Zero-G...Nothin But Net Ride - net force zero Weightlessness In free fall is the complete absence of the sensation of weight, i.e., zero apparent weight. It is also termed zero gravity, zero g-force, or zero-g (named after the g-force of 1G). NIST WTC Towers FAQ 31 - "the upper section came down essentially in free fall"
Joe, before it's too late. There are still 4 Apollo astronauts that walked on the moon for you to have on your show as well as the crew of Apollo 8. As of today May 12, 2013, Buzz Aldrin, David Scott, Charles Duke and Harrison Schmitt are still alive. Talk to one of them for God's sake!
The problem is none of these men give interviews about the moon landing. They never have. They only gave the initial press conference after the initial landing and that’s it.
What does Buzz Aldrin do now? Designing rockets, deep sea exploring, speaking all over the world for privatizing space and stimulating support for America's space program. Buzz is as active today as when he walked on the moon. He has written six books and numerous articles advocating concepts for the future of space travel.
Just a suggestion - but it's always an idea to familiarise yourself with at best, the very basics of a subject before you declare it fake. Firstly, they are belts, since there are two, with a third that is transitory. Secondly, "like ten hours" - what on Earth are you talking about? Thirdly, if you really feel the need to continue this exchange, consider the following. If you have a shred of integrity the I'd like you to honestly ask yourself the following questions. 1/ How much do I genuinely know about the Van Allen Belts? - their shape extent and distribution? Energies and intensity? Type of radiation? 2/ What do I actually understand by alpha and beta particle radiation and shielding against it? 3/ What have I understood about the actual structure of the Command Module and the materials that it was fashioned from? 4/ What have I learnt about the trajectories flown by each of the Apollo missions and their passage through the belts? 5/ What do I know about what James Van Allen himself have to say about the belts and the Apollo missions? If the answer to these questions is nothing, then obtaining the answers first will prevent you form humiliating yourself in the future and avoid making such a dumb and ignorant statement on a public comments section with no actual prior knowledge about the subject.
POINT... they did not fly 35mm film and 16mm movie film through a radiation belt... of any kind considering you cannot even put film thru an X-ray machine at the airport and safely get properly exposed film.
@@chadkbrignall22 So chose not to exercise any humility or heed my advice and arrogantly continue to post nonsense about a subject that you clearly have zero understanding of whatsoever. Do you understand what charged particle radiation is? Why are you mentioning X rays? Why are you doing this to yourself?
2001 A space oddesy looks like shit compared to the apollo footage. Im tierd of people saying Kubrick did it when there is actually no way of "faking" it. how can you drive for miles non stop in a studio for example? xd
I love how homeboy in the pink shirt says the moon landing hoax is so laughable and then admits he never even looked into it. Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. Unfortunately, more people are like him than not. People say the education system in America has failed us. I say it's succeeded. The leaders of this country, whoever they may be, do not want intelligent critical thinking citizens.
@@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 I agree. I made this comment 4 years ago and it cracks me up today. I've become a giant MMA fan in the past 2 and a half years and I like Ben Askren. It's great to see evidence of me not knowing who he is once. I still don't agree with him here and I'm slightly disappointed that he would be so wilfully ignorant but regardless I still like the guy.
Joe says he doesn't believe we didn't go to the moon anymore and then proceeds to bring up a dozen weird things that question the landings. It's so frustrating. Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean it didn't happen.
we never went there. the earth is an enclosed ecosystem. satellites do not exist they are giant cords that run along the bottom of the oceans. Joe changed his stance when they started to control him. the earth is flat, it's been proven over and over with thousands of experiments. most ppl know this they just don't report it
@Zane 778 giant cords running along the bottom of the ocean? Yeah. Oil pipes, internet/electric. There's legitimate reason in some conspiracy theories, but people like you shy everyone else away from the truth with bullshit like flat earth and enclosed ecosystems
In 10 mins Joe blew Ben's mind out his head and he went from saying "the moon landing conspiracy is the most bs" to saying "that's definitely faked I can see the strings" 😂😂😂
@@jdstox1 Exactly, these guys are at the same time admitting that the moon's gravity is much less than earth's but then refusing to acknowledge that what they are seeing is the obvious result of that. My mind is hurting from watching this, and I actually like Rogan.
Yea the result is too obvious. The moon landing is fake you just need to accept it already. Get over it. You guys don’t think it’s weird that these dudes would be bouncing around and literally rolling in jagged moon rocks when the slightest cut on your space suit would mean instant death and total mission failure? They seem to not care at ALL about getting a tear in their space suit…
@@JA-jx1hk Much of the surface is covered by regolith which while abrasive and troublesome like sand, it's not something that outright tears the suits. If the moon landings were faked, by now there would be incontrovertible evidence as such because so many people want to prove it as a hoax. Instead, all we have is a few people not at all educated in anything to do with space travel or rocket science saying the way the astronauts move "doesn't look right" to them LMFAO. Please.
That video of the astronaut 'attached to strings' looks like it might be playing in reverse. I'd be interested to see that video in reverse to see if it makes any more sense (I'm suggesting reversing the video which I think is reversed to get a 'normal' video)
Russia's Belka and Strelka spent a day in space orbit aboard spacecraft 'Korabl-Sputnik 2' on August 19, 1960, before safely returning to Earth. They are the first two dogs ever to fly and survive in outer space. They were accompanied by a grey rabbit, 42 mice, two rats, flies, and several plants and fungi. All passengers survived.
Nasa sent a nagger and a monkey into lower earth orbit back before the fake moon landings. The monkey kept getting orders, instructions, and flight plan corrections which made the nagger feel unimportant,useless, and (of coarse oppressed). So the next time Nasa sent a message the nagger intercepted it and it read as follows. Correct coarse 19 degrees 13 minutes and forty-two seconds, hold coarse for ten minutes 35 seconds then return as programed. Clean air filtering systems and purge your ballistic vaults and jets. P.S feed the nagger
Its a little funny that this guest went from denying the moon landing conspiracy, calling it one of the most ludicrous conspiracies, to then being convinced it was probably fake and the moon landing conspiracy theory is actually true within like 5 minutes of joe "convincing" him
Well he said he had never looked into it. after hearing some facts and looking at some videos ( clearly faked videos) he's thinking "hmm this is clearly bullshit"
If I went to the moon I imagine no matter who I were, once I felt that gravity difference, inner child would unlock and I'd want to jump and play and feel how weird it felt to move myh body!
Yeah such a humble guy. Scamming people through crypto scams without even bothering to look into what he’s promoting. Just taking his pay then scamming his fans.
And dude!!! That press conference he literally said we didn't break the atmosphere! Now you've got me thinking that there is no robots outside orbit either
"truths protective layers" is referring to the Scientific pursuit of the answers of how things work. Science generally makes discoveries in a piece by piece or layered way. Going to the moon wasn't send a rocket to the moon, it was a step by step process or uncovering the final answer a layer at a time.
Exactly. But some people see a conspiracies in their coffee. In the UA-cam Age, everybody and anybody gets to say whatever crap clogs their heads and spit out. Include me in.
There was literally a CNN reporter walking around the scene right after it happened, and said there was not a single piece of anything that looked like any sort of plane debris in the entire mess.
@@Coopdog1911 I remember this. There was a hole in the pentagon that was smaller than the plane. No wings left outside the building - and no marks on the building where the wings would have hit. The wings just disappeared. The surveillance clip from the gas station across the street conveniently had the frames removed from the video which would have shown what flew past. All we got was a few frames of an approaching shadow, skipped frames, then a few frames of a fireball then it cuts
youtube used to have a ton of videos on this subject, now i cant find any of them, except for the ones that say if you dont beleive we landed on the moon then you are a fool
You can thank all of the internet's crazy conspiracy nut jobs for that. Once really dangerous conspiracy theories started becoming a lot more mainstream like anti-vax, qanon, etc. big tech decided to crack down hard on conspiracy theories. Thanks to that there were many innocent casualties like moon landing conspiracies. It's like they say. This is why we can't have nice things. Someone always has to ruin it for everyone else.
@@bestieswithtesties i dont see what is dangerous about different opinions, but i do think coraling us all into thinking and believing the same things and removing any opposing view is super dangerous, communist china levels of bad. i personally know people that are crazy and believe some really bad information, but our society once cherished freedom of speech and free press for all ideas. let the bad information speak for its self and let everyone see just how bad it is, removing opposing ideas only makes those who have power afraid of something, imo thats worse than some of the meth head ideas i hear.
@@jasonbrown467 Because when you disregard facts and reality and replace it with your "opinion" things get extremely dangerous. For example, believing that vaccinations cause autism despite there being no evidence of it. This causes people not to vaccinate their kids which puts both the kid in extreme danger and any kids they come in contact with in danger. Or the crazy qanon conspiracy that has led to real life violence and death. Including the insurrection at the capitol which left 5 dead. It is a simple fact that conspiracy theorists in America, specifically the far right, have gotten completely out of control and they're spreading straight up lies and misinformation that is causing people to take to the streets in the real world and hurt or even kill others because they're so far gone and out of touch with reality. It is a danger to all of society without a doubt. Our country still has free speech. Anyone who complains about private companies not respecting free speech clearly don't understand what free speech even is. All it means is that the government can't arrest you for what you say (with exceptions) it doesn't mean you can just say whatever you want without repercussion from other citizens, your employer or superiors, or privately owned companies. On TOP of that, the people running these websites/companies like youtube and twitter ALSO have the freedom of speech which means they can't be forced to publish things on their platforms that they don't want to. THAT would be unconstitutional.
@@bestieswithtesties you are not being honest with your self if you think the right doesnt feel the same way about the left's propaganda. that is why a healthy compromise is important, or you end up in a civil war. your fact really are just your feelings btw. for example the left feels having open borders will solve all the problems of this country, sure they can spit out some numbers to "prove" their position but its all just feelings and perspective. if we cant even agree to let one said have their opinion and talk openly about it, what does that say about your side? if people think that hitting them selfs in the head with a sledge hammer will cure their disease it is not your right to tell them that they cant even talk about it. dont try to correct me about what free speech is, your team has lost credibility on your understanding the constitution. when a teacher gives a lesson to children about ho evil trump is you claim free speech, when nfl players take a knee, you claim free speech. also social media needs to decide if it is a platform or a publisher. i appreciate your toning down your insults, but i think we should go our separate ways, we cant even agree on how important it is that ideas from both sides should be heard, there no fixing that at right will not submit to your team such a fundamental concept that your team takes for granted with your 4 years of "mostly peaceful" protesting, where lives were lost and billions in property damage occurred
The conversation is such a non-conversation. As one knows, it's not even worth contributing to the diatribe. Moon landing deniers - without realising it - are treated with just as much disdain as "Flat Earthers" are to the academical world. Dunning-Kruger syndrome...
Between NASA and Hollywood, there was definitely plenty of advanced technology and mechanical equipment knowledge and special effects capabilities to produce film of what could appear to be a moon landing.
I have always been a skeptic man walked on the moon. What I find perplexing is why would the astronauts comment on UFOs on the moon's surface observing them. Those types of comments would not be necessary, unless they were actually on the moon's surface.
What they mean is aliens were watching them, we were watching them, we are an alien hybrid but,,, aliens are not living breathing beings they are spirits
mike lee look up the pictures and the video. Video is clearly fake. And the hole in the Pentagon looks like a explosion not at all a plane with wings going into the Pentagon.
All I'm gonna say if it genuinely was a plane that killed several people and crashed into the fucking pentagon, one of the most highly secured fucking buildings in the U.S. if not the most secured, there would be more than security footage that has about 3fps consistently and looks nothing like a plane, flies unbelievably low to the ground (In a 747 presumably btw which would have been torn to fucking pieces flying at that speed that low) and 20 years later cant give us any of the footage besides that. They confinscated camera feed from every local place that was in any location even remotely capable of capturing footage of it. How are people not supposed to assume they are feeding us bullshit. They wouldnt be hiding this shit for 20 years waiting for everyone to forget about it. The footage they gave us makes gas station CCTV look like 4k man.
It was 2001. There were no HD cameras or security cameras that were capable of that sort of resolution at that time. Hell, cellular phone cameras were more advanced and that’s simply due to bureaucratic government purchasing and procurement policies. 9/11 helped change ALL of that. Now there’s high res cameras everywhere. It just isn’t the way you’re saying it should’ve been on that day. A commercial jetliner hit the pentagon and did catastrophic damage to the structure. Nearly totally disintegrating the airframe and fuselage of the aircraft and killing 184. Altitude has nothing to do with the aerodynamic forces exerted on the plane. You’ve obviously never seen test footage of a 757 flying fast and low. They don’t just come apart. Wow.
@@marklewen9384 You can say that all you want, doesn't change the reality of the situation. Planes were hijacked by terrorists which crashed into buildings and one in a field. There are literal videos of the planes hitting the buildings, there's recordings of phone calls of people on the plane, there's literal records of all the people on the planes.
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo there is zero evidence of hijackers. The planes were flown from the ground. No plane hit the pentagon. Even the pilot who Flew the exact plane that supposedly hit the pentagon 300 times said he couldn't hit the pentagon without help from the ground. 19 hijackers who just learned to fly on single engine cessnas COULD NEVER DO IT.
@@alphanerd7221 Don't you know? After the moon travels NASA ""lost"" the technology and doesn't know how to do it again. Mysteriously it got destroyed, somehow, somewhere, after people started doing questions.
@@GranMaese Yeah that's BS. The did lose the designs for the Saturn 5 but they were never going to build it again. That really isn't any kind of point. It isn't destroyed. The plans are in some filing cabinet in a room full of filing cabinets. It's not like they would have showed them anyway. They are classified. If NASA just never said anything you would have no idea. The questions are stupid. Everyone who isn't dumb knows we went to the moon.
@@alphanerd7221 Damn, you are so nervous and scared, your passive-aggresive attitude demonstrates that. So gullible... They were ""destroyed"" (never existed if you asked me). That's literally the reason they give on why they can't reach it ""anymore"". They are clueless on how to do it ""again"". Everyone who isn't dumb and indoctrinated knows we did not go to the moon.
G.Gorrell what are you talking about it's proof the twin towers were engineered for an impact frrom a full size jet linear. Because of the plane that crashed into the new York skyline in the early 1920s
Definitely intervention of some kind. There's molten steel pouring out of the sides of the building before the towers fell. Joe has his 3 that he'll bring up: moon landing, northwoods, gulf of tanken. There is so much evidence of foul play in 911 but he always treats that as nuts. There is more evidence there than the moon landing that's for sure
Yes and I really like that he doesn’t say that he doesn’t believe it but behind closed doors there’s so much more that I would like to talk about with joe Rogan
Oh shut up lol. Is there no end to yhe paranoia of you whackjobs? What's so hard to accept he has changed his mind after becoming better informed?? I hate to admit it but i once believed 911 was 'an inside job', but after some thorough research, it soon became evident there was no truth to any of the conspiracy claims.
If they did show simulations and passed them off as the real thing...my next question would be why/how would you make a simulation to look exactly like space including the black background? Why go for over the top realism unless they were purposely trying to pull one over. I've seen some of the tests and simulations and they didn't bother making it look like it was in space. I'm with Joe, I'm not convinced either way but something squirly was going on. You know how you can be certain shady business was going on? Government was involved.
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today. Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification. The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis. No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves. Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
Oh, yeah. One more thing. If you're wondering why the astronauts are 'bouncing around' and 'springing back up' you might consider the fact that the astronauts were around 180 lbs each, and that their space suits each weighed about 180 lbs as well. (that's Earth weight guys). The Moon has about 1/6th Earth's gravity, meaning that the astronauts and their suits weighed about 60 lbs each on the lunar surface. Since the astronauts were in excellent condition and were therefore only carrying around about 60 lbs (again on the Moon's surface), bouncing back up really wouldn't be that difficult.
I remember being in Creative Writing Class in the 7th grade. It was 1976. It was the first time I had ever heard about a possible moon landing conspiracy from my teacher. He wasn't an advocate but he planted the what if in my mind. I personally don't believe it. I think they went there and some of the scenes were filmed somewhere else like Joe said.😅😅
@andrewgill2561 look I'm not getting into a discussion with some non-entity on UA-cam. If you don't where to look to do real research then there's no hope for ya. Bye.
@Ned Simlish im not agreeing or denying anything. Im just saying that if I weighed like 15kg instead of the 60 I actually weigh, i could probably pull that off. It could still be fake tho
@Ned Simlish also we weren’t there so we don’t know what actually happened. For all we know they could’ve stayed home that day or they could’ve gone to the moon and back twice. They could’ve even gone at the ISS for a beer and then came back down. Only they know what actually happened and unfortunately everything we’re left with are theories and speculations :/
Is he not pushing up with his right hand? Impossible on earth, but it seems plausible your tricep could do the job if you are strong and in low gravity.
"we lost that kind of technology, we wish we could go back" " We taped over all the video and data records from the moon landing" - NASA scientist talking about going to the moon
I was literally yelling at my phone for him to play that clip..or to talk about them recording over all the original footage of the moon landing. Or the weird way they broadcasted it..by playing on a projector screen first than having a camera record that so it would be way more blurry and hard to see details. There's 1000 other things. But simple stuff like the way they broadcasted it on tv like that really points to hiding shit. There's no other reason to do it that way unless you were trying to hide shit...no other reason. Can you imagine if a guy shot a video of bigfoot today and he swore up and down it was the real deal. He makes a youtube video and he has the video shot in 420p than projected on to a screen than he records that screen with his phone and puts it up on UA-cam. Not a sole alive would look at that and be like yup looks lagit.
you can watch the guy pull himself up using his left arm and his buddy lifting with his prospective right arm. he's not getting yanked up by wires. just watch it a few more times, the arms lifting are blocked a lot by the standing dude, but once you see it, its obvious that the guy on the right helps him up.
Such a simple yet underrated comment and observation. You would think to find evidence alluding to it being fake you would have to do some complex deep dive but even a questioning a single detail like that makes sense. Those are non essential items and when traveling in space space and weight are very important.
The moon rover was a very useful vehicle Apollo 15-17 used to increase their range of exploration on the moon. As for the golf club, the astronauts were allowed to bring a personal item with them, and seeing as how a golf club and 3 golf balls weigh about as much as Alan Sheperd's ball sack, weight wasn't at all a concern.
In 1969 they only had cameras with photographic paper that would not have withstood the extreme temperatures that exist on a rock in space that has no atmosphere, from 250 degrees in the sun to minus 250 degrees Celsius
That's on the lunar surface. A vacuum is a perfect insulator, because there is no way for heat to transfer by convection or conduction - only solar radiation. Also, those extreme temps are only reached far into the lunar day, after about 14 earth days.
With the whole “ he couldn’t have stood up like that without a wire” thing. If you look at the close up they give you see his arm is on his buddies right hand sleeve. I think it’s plausible that he could have given one good yank expecting it to take more force than actually required and it gave him the boost needed.
Joe understands that he can't be 100% honest on how he feels about certain subjects because it could cost him potential jobs in mainstream media. Smart on his part, still a little disappointing nonetheless
He sold out when he was saying shit like "Bernie Sanders has insane beliefs about wealth..." like what.. that it should be used to make the world a better place for everyone and not just a dreamland for a select few? Fuck Joe Rogan I hope someone shivs him in the throat. Along with all these other shill fucks and sellout politicians... then move on to all the god damn rich 1% assholes who, last year, made over 80% of all the income in the world. There is no need for it. They are hurting people, killing people, and they don't care. They will not stop until they have anything and if we wait too long we aren't going to even have the strength to fight back at all. Which is what they are counting on... boil a frog slowly and what not.
HHstutz55 it's sad how people can't see this! Clear as day if your not brainwashed. I have listened to 90 percent of all joe's podcasts and definitely see what you see.
ScoutFighter #1 Sad that people can't see he will say anything to keep his luxurious life? What's actually sad is you don't realize that we do see it and that is exactly the fucking problem.
This guy looks like an ancient Greek statue
This guy got knocked out by jake paul
Oh I know which one you're talking about....the guy with the small pee pee?
why y’all hating on ben askren
Hahaha hahaha
@@someguy6367 Its all jokes man
Still blown away that Joe was able to get Socrates to come on the podcast.
Underrated comment
😂
😂😂😂😂
Ben does look like a greek god😂
Isn't he David?
My uncle was stationed in the pentagon on 911, his office was in the wing that was hit. He told me the wing was under maintenance and was empty when it was hit. He was in an outside office building when it happened. Sus.
why is it sus; E-Wedge was being rebuilt for years before 911. I spent a year in there prior to 911 putting up steel for new mechanical towers and elevator shafts
Sus is what actually hit the Pentagon.
They knew they what they were gonna do years and years ahead. They always have a plan far ahead of when it happens…
So much irrefutable evidence against a plane hitting the Pentagon. Several videos showing footage of a cruise missile flying towards the Pentagon on the day. The engine at the "crash" site was the wrong type for the plane that supposedly hit it. Every expert pilot ever interviewed about it saying it was completely impossible to fly a plane that low and not hit any of the lampposts on the way in. A complete la la fantasy.
Oh ya my uncle was special forces and had to register his hands as deadly weapons
One incredible thing was they were able to do a live broadcasting of the first moon landing in 1969.
It's not that incredible considering the broadcast was 325 lines at 10fps. Radio waves travel perpetually in space, so the 234,000 miles is nothing compared to Voyager 1's 14 billion miles, which is still broadcasting a signal back to Earth but with a 22+ hr delay. The delay from the moon and back is only 1.33 seconds.
@@efficiencyinavan for some reason I can’t get service in my master bedroom
@@pumaraebon80 Different radio frequencies and amplitudes. The signal from the moon was very low frequency and very high amplitude. Many times greater than the weak signal we get to our phones. You can complain to your service provider and they will be more likely to install a tower closer to your house, which may be more exposed to your master bedroom.
@@efficiencyinavanYeah but that just makes it all the easier to fake. Easy explanations and answers for the people. Why spend 26 bill creating a mission that might fail miserably and embarrass your nation in a time of competition, when you can spend 1 Bill or less just faking it.
@@efficiencyinavando radio waves need an atmosphere to travel ?
Joe's ability to know AND acknowledge that sometimes he doesn't know what he's talking about is something so many more people could use.
No, he's pure Dunning-Kruger
@@SovereignStatesman Dude assessed his own level of knowledge as mostly ignorant - shit, dunning-kruger means he must be one of the smart ones...
And he's the guy that people paint as conspiracy peddling fascist. Can't be admitting gaps in your knowledge - pick a side and stand up for it!!!
Joe probably has either been blackmailed or has taken the blue pill, either one is bad.
As well as a more comprehensive education and the ability to think critically.
Joe “ I was balls deep in this stuff for years” rogan
:)) best comment
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 GOLD
OMG I just died! That is definitely the best comment ever
The only thing I'm balls deep in is some juicy hot box
When he pulled out his balls got ripped off.
“You can’t get down without no base”
Great quote
‘There are people who think satellites and dinosaurs are fake’. Joe was 100% talking about Eddie there haha
Eddie is an absolute idiot. I cant even listen to him talk without ending the videos early. So cringey
@@andrewderringer3765 eddie would still put u in coma
@@javiii8337 No refute there. But his brain leads me to believe he's already in one
@@andrewderringer3765 eddie is right on many things, flat earth is not one of them.
@@javiii8337 sorry flat earth is absolutely one of them. Eddie is a fucking idiot but that doesn't discredit that the earth is flat. There's way too many government documents that admit it's flat, no curvature measured... Boats don't go over a curve when you can zoom in with a camera and they come back into view. This was the biggest round earth defense for centuries and now anyone with a camera with decent zoom can prove it wrong but nobody cares cuz they're all brainwashed like you bro. You see where Joe Rogan talks with others about flat earth, just says there all stupid and retarded over and over but no science to back his shit... Your god Joe Rogan wants you to feel retarded if you even question the globe, the dumb pos sold his soul to the devil long ago, uses his all seeing eye symbol as well. Idiots gather in giant crowds, turns out Joe has a bigger crowd than CNN. Y'all are fucking idiots and fell for the trump scam too lol
That feeling you get when you realize all the cold war was was American Nazis vs. Soviet Nazis...
our german scientists are better than, your german scientists, 😅
the way you say it has a better ring to it!!! 👊🏽😎
@CONTROL-Z nazis scientist getting america to the moon vs nazis scientist first reaching the space
Yup
That exchange was Operation Paperclip.
Sonsabitches
Well said
The cold war was more than just the space race 🤦
You’re telling me that we had the technology back in the 60s and 70s. Then lost all technology we used and have never been back since. We’ve never left the atmosphere!!
Right… and NASA recorded over the first man to ever walk on the moon to “save space”. 😅 Give me a break.
Yes
The only thing they landed on was our heads😂
16:50 thing falling down could be used to calculate gravity since it would give a really good gauge of downwards velocity.
It's easier to fool intelligent people than it is to convince intelligent people they've been fooled.
A month later and still not a reference to the quote. I'll help you, Mark Twain.
@@pawpaw__ huh
@@gabeprice3333mark twain said the quote
@@spanningbread lol I know. I was just being dumb
@@gabeprice3333 i see, was just tryna help lol
Ben seems like a genuine guy. He actually listens to Rogans conspiracies and considers them. Offering more than hysteria.
he got knocked aht by jake paul lol
7:00 lmao what a load of bullshit, talk about believing in stupid conspiracies.
They probably locked them in a cage with a bear and and eagle when they caught them stuffing diamonds inside their lower end 😂😂😂
@@alainportant6412 took me about 5 minutes to confirm this “conspiracy”… Von Braun used prisoners from the Dora-Mittelbau concentration camp for labor. They were regularly worked to death and publicly executed
Hysteria?
@@Pvtpob
That's fake. You probably used google which is jewish owned, thats why
That last clip with the astronaut standing up would be super strange if there wasn’t another astronaut there who had his hand when he got up
Did anyone else notice the thing that fell off the astronauts back pack at 16:50 it fell way faster than the astronauts do.
Shit was super fake
Nothing fell off his pack, that was his left foot.
@@UpperDarbyDetailing look again behind him. something definitely fell onto the ground.
@@muleunit yeah.. like I said. It was his left foot kicking the regolith. Just some “dirt”.
This old podcast's are more interesting to watch then the new ones
Just thinking that bro
I disagree, you just have nostalgia
Tons of interesting guests since then, you just gotta pick and choice. I skip all the MMA live shows, and I only watch the comedian guests when I want pure laughs and bs.
@@ActionJackson669 joe was a lot more relaxed then and he actually had civil arguements and would go at people when they were false. Now he agrees with every single body that goes on.
No I used to wonder about the same thing but in reality there's just so many episodes that the interesting ones become more scarce.
When he only had so many episodes it made the 2 with Alex Jones, the alien shit, Elon Musk and conspiracy episodes etc more common. Now the 3rd time around with Alex etc is surrounded with 1500 plain podcasts.
I cant believe the amount of times I've heard Joe explain operation paperclip and that theres still people who have never heard about it. I learned about it when I was like 9 years old only cause I was interested in WW2 massively at the age. But just goes to show, you dont even need to be into conspiracies to have heard about it lol.
The reason it isn’t taught is because that’s something the US doesn’t want people to know. They want us to believe everything made and done was by Americans. What good is it if the greatest feat by mankind was aided by Nazis
@@97NikeSb Very true!
@@koreywilliams8418 that’s why I find it hilarious the fake moon landing conspiracy theorists always leave out the fact we even got to the moon was because Nazis helped us out and USSR Nazis backed it up that we landed on the moon lol
@@97NikeSb
That's because nobody has ever gone to the moon, smart guy !
You should watch the video where the head guy at NASA says that we haven't gone back to the moon because we don't have the technology. You could ask to see the video footage of the moon landing that according to NASA was recorded over and that they habe absolutely no footage, pictures, voice recordings.
You can watch them grab wires when they are supposedly on the spaceship floating in space.
Go watch the valuetainment podcast with the dude who has footage that says "Do not release to public" and basically proves that it is bullshit.
You do absolutely no research, fill in the blank parts of a story with your imagination and believe it to be 100% facts.
I didn't know about operation paperclip until I was in my early 20s. I definitely didn't learn about it in school.
I’m telling you, Joe, that was a tomahawk cruise missile, the hole was not even big enough for a fuselage. There was no wings no engines no seats no luggage just tomahawk cruise missile pieces.
No bodies either.
No sign of burn on the grass, it came in low. Also I was watching this live and Jamie McIntyre with CNN was interviewing someone at the Pentagon and he raced around the building with his cameraman and there was NO debris whatsoever. Tiny hole and no damage from the wings. This makes me so mad. And what they did to Jamie.
@@solamano7239Watch SEPTEMBER 11 THE NEW PEARL HARBOR
Before UA-cam removes it again
I remember being in class when the Apollo 13 crisis was going on . I was in a private school so we were able to pray all together as a class.
Joe - talk to architects for 9/11 and discuss just building 7.
Joe , please don't mention dr judy wood. "Where did the towers go? "
Watch SEPTEMBER 11 THE NEW PEARL HARBOR
Joe’s been told the rules, now he won’t touch it, he used to be a moon landing skeptic but….now he plays within the rules
Describing scientific breakthroughs as “removing truth’s protective layers” is actually quite beautiful prose.
but the clowns will gobble up the story if it's sold as "cryptic" and "potential giving out"
@@madlad4206 Tough talk for a man with a small cock.
I didnt find it cryptic or odd at all
Well Rogan didn't understand it. Therefore there MUST be a conspiracy !!!! Too funny
NASA is the protective layer to the truth. In 2007, when Google announced a 34 million dollar reward* for any private organization to send a rover to the Moon and live broadcast the Apollo landing sites, why do you think NASA immediately made the landing zones a restricted area? Do you really think it was to "preserve history"? No, they were more likely protecting the truth.
*30m for landing on Moon, and an additional 4m for live recording the Apollo landing sites.
Joe “fear is a factor for me” rogan
Douglas Cameron lol with his hair
Joe “I say whatever doesn’t offend my guest” rogan
😬😮😬😮 Blasphemy!!
I started that and now everyone is doing it
@@devildog8427 yea cool story bro 🙄
Joe this convo is waayyy over his head
Thank you for all your great work Joe you deserve everything we all love ya
Zero-G...Nothin But Net Ride - net force zero
Weightlessness In free fall is the complete absence of the sensation of weight, i.e., zero apparent weight. It is also termed zero gravity, zero g-force, or zero-g (named after the g-force of 1G).
NIST WTC Towers FAQ 31 - "the upper section came down essentially in free fall"
Nothing like clocking out of work, getting in my car and driving home listening to this. Fun.
DONT TEXT AND DRIVE!
regards,
Captain Hindsight.
Joe, before it's too late. There are still 4 Apollo astronauts that walked on the moon for you to have on your show as well as the crew of Apollo 8. As of today May 12, 2013, Buzz Aldrin, David Scott, Charles Duke and Harrison Schmitt are still alive. Talk to one of them for God's sake!
2013?
The problem is none of these men give interviews about the moon landing. They never have. They only gave the initial press conference after the initial landing and that’s it.
I want this just so Buzz Aldrin can sock him in the mouth from across the table when he questions the veracity of the moon landing.
@@braulioaguilera4267 not one of them will swear on a bible they've been to the moon, if they did it would end all this discussion.
What does Buzz Aldrin do now?
Designing rockets, deep sea exploring, speaking all over the world for privatizing space and stimulating support for America's space program. Buzz is as active today as when he walked on the moon. He has written six books and numerous articles advocating concepts for the future of space travel.
You forgot the Dune Buggy and the astronauts playing golf!😂😂😂
And?
Conclusion or New Conspiracy: The moonlandin is real, the footage is not. Maybe there is something they don't won't us to know🤔
joe "show me the ufos and il lie about it for the rest of my life" rogen
Sonic Spange this deserves more thumbs up
wouldn't that mean he saw ufos????????
@Jesus Was Antifa Thats not the long form word lmao. Its unidentified flying opject, that doesnt mean they hard confirmed aliens
@@NeutralGuyDoubleZero the gov are the aliens
@@anylastwordspod Lol
Operation "Joe Rogan" Northwoods
The thumbnail for this video 😂
Plus the little problem with the Van Allen belt that takes like 10 hrs to pass thru
Just a suggestion - but it's always an idea to familiarise yourself with at best, the very basics of a subject before you declare it fake. Firstly, they are belts, since there are two, with a third that is transitory. Secondly, "like ten hours" - what on Earth are you talking about? Thirdly, if you really feel the need to continue this exchange, consider the following.
If you have a shred of integrity the I'd like you to honestly ask yourself the following questions.
1/ How much do I genuinely know about the Van Allen Belts? - their shape extent and distribution? Energies and intensity? Type of radiation?
2/ What do I actually understand by alpha and beta particle radiation and shielding against it?
3/ What have I understood about the actual structure of the Command Module and the materials that it was fashioned from?
4/ What have I learnt about the trajectories flown by each of the Apollo missions and their passage through the belts?
5/ What do I know about what James Van Allen himself have to say about the belts and the Apollo missions?
If the answer to these questions is nothing, then obtaining the answers first will prevent you form humiliating yourself in the future and avoid making such a dumb and ignorant statement on a public comments section with no actual prior knowledge about the subject.
@@yassassin6425 sweetheart.. the only dumb looking one is your ridiculously long babble of an answer.
POINT... they did not fly 35mm film and 16mm movie film through a radiation belt... of any kind considering you cannot even put film thru an X-ray machine at the airport and safely get properly exposed film.
@@chadkbrignall22
So chose not to exercise any humility or heed my advice and arrogantly continue to post nonsense about a subject that you clearly have zero understanding of whatsoever.
Do you understand what charged particle radiation is? Why are you mentioning X rays? Why are you doing this to yourself?
@@yassassin6425why do u feel the need to comment on every moon landing video on UA-cam 😆
The conspiracy isn’t that we didn’t go to the moon. It’s that we never left
Real Gang 👀👀👀👀👀 I'm to high for this 😂
Sweet
It means there's been a secret space outpost on the moon since the '60s. Keep up with conversation, or you can sit at the kids table.
We all in da matrix
Daniel Joyce
I wipe before i poop
Look into it
Kubrick should get the biggest Oscar for 'Moon Landing' movie.
You mean 2001: A Space Odyssey? He did.
2001 A space oddesy looks like shit compared to the apollo footage. Im tierd of people saying Kubrick did it when there is actually no way of "faking" it. how can you drive for miles non stop in a studio for example? xd
@@sledstorm4703I think this guy is joking but some others aren't.
I love how homeboy in the pink shirt says the moon landing hoax is so laughable and then admits he never even looked into it. Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. Unfortunately, more people are like him than not. People say the education system in America has failed us. I say it's succeeded. The leaders of this country, whoever they may be, do not want intelligent critical thinking citizens.
I did look into it ,thats what makes it so laughable.
@@stevekon11 👌
Ben Askren is one of the smartest people I’ve seen on JRE not even kidding lol
@@patstaysuckafreeboss8006 I agree. I made this comment 4 years ago and it cracks me up today. I've become a giant MMA fan in the past 2 and a half years and I like Ben Askren. It's great to see evidence of me not knowing who he is once. I still don't agree with him here and I'm slightly disappointed that he would be so wilfully ignorant but regardless I still like the guy.
Lol keep being a sheep bro 😂 the government green screened the fuck out of America and most of u fell for it 😂
When you see a thumbnail like that with that title, you just have to click on it lol.
Fuel to go to the moon which is 260,000 miles into deep space? Can't do it since 1972? Nah, they didn't go to the moon.
It doesn’t take much fuel. When the Apollo modules orbited earth and then slingshotted out of orbit, there speed was approximately 24,000 mph.
Watch ASTRONAUTS GONE WILD
Bottom line technology in 1969 wasn’t good enough to fake landing on the moon.
Fascinating. What in particular was lacking and why?
@@yassassin6425 ua-cam.com/video/cVMO8hXL-Bo/v-deo.htmlsi=mVHk38B_lCNw_wUS
@@yassassin6425 ua-cam.com/video/oR_e9y-bka0/v-deo.htmlsi=qgtNsvyirR4Egucj
@@yassassin6425 these were the best films at the same time
@@DannyGmusicc
What?
“I don’t know” it’s amazing how aligned my own views on conspiracy’s / UFO’s etc are with Joe.
When Rogan Says "I think I don't know," he could be referring to any subject he ever had an opinion about.
Joe says he doesn't believe we didn't go to the moon anymore and then proceeds to bring up a dozen weird things that question the landings. It's so frustrating. Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean it didn't happen.
“ That’s no moon....it’s a space station “ - Ben Kenobi
If ur not with me then ur my enemy
@@xtravugant4245”You were the chosen one!, it’s said that you would destroy the Sith not join them!”
I wish you would cover more stuff like this we need to go back to it
He is on spotify
we never went there. the earth is an enclosed ecosystem. satellites do not exist they are giant cords that run along the bottom of the oceans. Joe changed his stance when they started to control him. the earth is flat, it's been proven over and over with thousands of experiments. most ppl know this they just don't report it
@Zane 778 giant cords running along the bottom of the ocean? Yeah. Oil pipes, internet/electric. There's legitimate reason in some conspiracy theories, but people like you shy everyone else away from the truth with bullshit like flat earth and enclosed ecosystems
You are wrong in saying that we didn't go to the moon. I worked the program and worked with their problems while they were on the moon. You are wrong
@@AlBundy160 I never said we didn't go to the moon. I believe we did and wish we would cover this more
Every time the camera shifts to Ben I see him getting flying kneed 😂😂😂
Bruh I still feel like that after all this time😂😂
Homeboy looks like he did a sourhead challenge or they put a box of some stanley diapers under his table
me 2
😂
Cut it out man
The grand total of planes lost on 9/11: Two.
The most fortified building on earth and one video that shows nothing?
"I aimed for the moon, but sometimes I hit London" - Werner Von B
🤣
Great American hero 😂 w Von B
‘What the fuck was that?’ - Mayor of Hiroshima
In 10 mins Joe blew Ben's mind out his head and he went from saying "the moon landing conspiracy is the most bs" to saying "that's definitely faked I can see the strings" 😂😂😂
dude knew how gravity would work on the human body if it were on the moon within seconds lol
because mma
@@jdstox1 Exactly, these guys are at the same time admitting that the moon's gravity is much less than earth's but then refusing to acknowledge that what they are seeing is the obvious result of that. My mind is hurting from watching this, and I actually like Rogan.
Yea the result is too obvious. The moon landing is fake you just need to accept it already. Get over it. You guys don’t think it’s weird that these dudes would be bouncing around and literally rolling in jagged moon rocks when the slightest cut on your space suit would mean instant death and total mission failure? They seem to not care at ALL about getting a tear in their space suit…
@@JA-jx1hk Much of the surface is covered by regolith which while abrasive and troublesome like sand, it's not something that outright tears the suits. If the moon landings were faked, by now there would be incontrovertible evidence as such because so many people want to prove it as a hoax. Instead, all we have is a few people not at all educated in anything to do with space travel or rocket science saying the way the astronauts move "doesn't look right" to them LMFAO. Please.
“Why risk human lives, that’s like.. retro” 💀🤣
I’m here for it my guy
What a what?
That video of the astronaut 'attached to strings' looks like it might be playing in reverse. I'd be interested to see that video in reverse to see if it makes any more sense (I'm suggesting reversing the video which I think is reversed to get a 'normal' video)
Russia's Belka and Strelka spent a day in space orbit aboard spacecraft 'Korabl-Sputnik 2' on August 19, 1960, before safely returning to Earth. They are the first two dogs ever to fly and survive in outer space. They were accompanied by a grey rabbit, 42 mice, two rats, flies, and several plants and fungi. All passengers survived.
Nasa sent a nagger and a monkey into lower earth orbit back before the fake moon landings. The monkey kept getting orders, instructions, and flight plan corrections which made the nagger feel unimportant,useless, and (of coarse oppressed). So the next time Nasa sent a message the nagger intercepted it and it read as follows. Correct coarse 19 degrees 13 minutes and forty-two seconds, hold coarse for ten minutes 35 seconds then return as programed. Clean air filtering systems and purge your ballistic vaults and jets. P.S feed the nagger
Its a little funny that this guest went from denying the moon landing conspiracy, calling it one of the most ludicrous conspiracies, to then being convinced it was probably fake and the moon landing conspiracy theory is actually true within like 5 minutes of joe "convincing" him
Joe is a super passive-aggressive kettle-bell-strong jew-jitsu-shill supreme..
Well he said he had never looked into it. after hearing some facts and looking at some videos ( clearly faked videos) he's thinking "hmm this is clearly bullshit"
Well its no rocket science lmao
that demonstrates perfectly how people easily fall for this kind of bullshit
@@dorjedradul9805 Jew jit su lol
17:36 🤣🤣🤣🤣....I got you 😂
If I went to the moon I imagine no matter who I were, once I felt that gravity difference, inner child would unlock and I'd want to jump and play and feel how weird it felt to move myh body!
I love Ben he wasn't my favorite fighter for sure. But as a person he seems like a genuine and humble guy.
Agree
I will allways wonder how the fight against Mascidal had went, had he just not dived from the 1 second of the fight
Yeah such a humble guy. Scamming people through crypto scams without even bothering to look into what he’s promoting. Just taking his pay then scamming his fans.
Ben ? Joe was a fighter
Yeah but China confirmed we went. They have photos of our equipment left behind. That’s enough for me cause we hate each other.
Ben askren talking about moon landing is all i needed today 💀
Who the fook is that guy
And dude!!! That press conference he literally said we didn't break the atmosphere! Now you've got me thinking that there is no robots outside orbit either
What on Earth are you talking about?
"truths protective layers" is referring to the Scientific pursuit of the answers of how things work. Science generally makes discoveries in a piece by piece or layered way. Going to the moon wasn't send a rocket to the moon, it was a step by step process or uncovering the final answer a layer at a time.
Exactly. But some people see a conspiracies in their coffee. In the UA-cam Age, everybody and anybody gets to say whatever crap clogs their heads and spit out. Include me in.
There was literally a CNN reporter walking around the scene right after it happened, and said there was not a single piece of anything that looked like any sort of plane debris in the entire mess.
CNN has always been such a credible source right up to this day..
@@tylergrundy4436 I think that was one time they let the truth slip through. Of course he changed his story soon after
@@tylergrundy4436 CNN is pro-system though
@@Coopdog1911 I remember this. There was a hole in the pentagon that was smaller than the plane. No wings left outside the building - and no marks on the building where the wings would have hit. The wings just disappeared.
The surveillance clip from the gas station across the street conveniently had the frames removed from the video which would have shown what flew past. All we got was a few frames of an approaching shadow, skipped frames, then a few frames of a fireball then it cuts
A plane hit the pentagon.
I love how the thumbnail is Joe doing Jack Nicholson’s ‘shining’ face.
😂
Joe put his Jack Nicholson face on thumbnail lol
youtube used to have a ton of videos on this subject, now i cant find any of them, except for the ones that say if you dont beleive we landed on the moon then you are a fool
censorship...
You can thank all of the internet's crazy conspiracy nut jobs for that. Once really dangerous conspiracy theories started becoming a lot more mainstream like anti-vax, qanon, etc. big tech decided to crack down hard on conspiracy theories. Thanks to that there were many innocent casualties like moon landing conspiracies. It's like they say. This is why we can't have nice things. Someone always has to ruin it for everyone else.
@@bestieswithtesties i dont see what is dangerous about different opinions, but i do think coraling us all into thinking and believing the same things and removing any opposing view is super dangerous, communist china levels of bad. i personally know people that are crazy and believe some really bad information, but our society once cherished freedom of speech and free press for all ideas. let the bad information speak for its self and let everyone see just how bad it is, removing opposing ideas only makes those who have power afraid of something, imo thats worse than some of the meth head ideas i hear.
@@jasonbrown467 Because when you disregard facts and reality and replace it with your "opinion" things get extremely dangerous. For example, believing that vaccinations cause autism despite there being no evidence of it. This causes people not to vaccinate their kids which puts both the kid in extreme danger and any kids they come in contact with in danger. Or the crazy qanon conspiracy that has led to real life violence and death. Including the insurrection at the capitol which left 5 dead. It is a simple fact that conspiracy theorists in America, specifically the far right, have gotten completely out of control and they're spreading straight up lies and misinformation that is causing people to take to the streets in the real world and hurt or even kill others because they're so far gone and out of touch with reality. It is a danger to all of society without a doubt. Our country still has free speech. Anyone who complains about private companies not respecting free speech clearly don't understand what free speech even is. All it means is that the government can't arrest you for what you say (with exceptions) it doesn't mean you can just say whatever you want without repercussion from other citizens, your employer or superiors, or privately owned companies. On TOP of that, the people running these websites/companies like youtube and twitter ALSO have the freedom of speech which means they can't be forced to publish things on their platforms that they don't want to. THAT would be unconstitutional.
@@bestieswithtesties you are not being honest with your self if you think the right doesnt feel the same way about the left's propaganda. that is why a healthy compromise is important, or you end up in a civil war. your fact really are just your feelings btw. for example the left feels having open borders will solve all the problems of this country, sure they can spit out some numbers to "prove" their position but its all just feelings and perspective. if we cant even agree to let one said have their opinion and talk openly about it, what does that say about your side? if people think that hitting them selfs in the head with a sledge hammer will cure their disease it is not your right to tell them that they cant even talk about it. dont try to correct me about what free speech is, your team has lost credibility on your understanding the constitution. when a teacher gives a lesson to children about ho evil trump is you claim free speech, when nfl players take a knee, you claim free speech. also social media needs to decide if it is a platform or a publisher. i appreciate your toning down your insults, but i think we should go our separate ways, we cant even agree on how important it is that ideas from both sides should be heard, there no fixing that at right will not submit to your team such a fundamental concept that your team takes for granted with your 4 years of "mostly peaceful" protesting, where lives were lost and billions in property damage occurred
Mannn! This guest truly wasn’t lying when he said that he doesn’t know much about Moon and space!
The conversation is such a non-conversation.
As one knows, it's not even worth contributing to the diatribe.
Moon landing deniers - without realising it - are treated with just as much disdain as "Flat Earthers" are to the academical world.
Dunning-Kruger syndrome...
Between NASA and Hollywood, there was definitely plenty of advanced technology and mechanical equipment knowledge and special effects capabilities to produce film of what could appear to be a moon landing.
No there wasn't. Such a hoax would have been utterly impossible.
I have always been a skeptic man walked on the moon. What I find perplexing is why would the astronauts comment on UFOs on the moon's surface observing them. Those types of comments would not be necessary, unless they were actually on the moon's surface.
What they mean is aliens were watching them, we were watching them, we are an alien hybrid but,,, aliens are not living breathing beings they are spirits
There was no aircraft parts on the lawn.
sinbad656 why would there be the plane hit the building and was moving forward why would plane parts be behind the impact
Oh you were there..
First you learn grammar, then you question 9/11
sinbad656 yes there was. You know it stop denying what you know is true
mike lee look up the pictures and the video. Video is clearly fake. And the hole in the Pentagon looks like a explosion not at all a plane with wings going into the Pentagon.
why were the Astros filming from opposite side of capsule out a small round window in low earth orbit ?
9:50 spot on and depressing at the same time. There's a lot of things that 🤔 could be set straight
Little did joe know, we are going back to the moon with the Artemis mission
Joe really pulled a perfect Jack Nicholson's Joker smile on this thumbnail
All I'm gonna say if it genuinely was a plane that killed several people and crashed into the fucking pentagon, one of the most highly secured fucking buildings in the U.S. if not the most secured, there would be more than security footage that has about 3fps consistently and looks nothing like a plane, flies unbelievably low to the ground (In a 747 presumably btw which would have been torn to fucking pieces flying at that speed that low) and 20 years later cant give us any of the footage besides that. They confinscated camera feed from every local place that was in any location even remotely capable of capturing footage of it. How are people not supposed to assume they are feeding us bullshit. They wouldnt be hiding this shit for 20 years waiting for everyone to forget about it. The footage they gave us makes gas station CCTV look like 4k man.
It really was a plane. This is documented historical fact.
It was 2001. There were no HD cameras or security cameras that were capable of that sort of resolution at that time. Hell, cellular phone cameras were more advanced and that’s simply due to bureaucratic government purchasing and procurement policies. 9/11 helped change ALL of that. Now there’s high res cameras everywhere. It just isn’t the way you’re saying it should’ve been on that day. A commercial jetliner hit the pentagon and did catastrophic damage to the structure. Nearly totally disintegrating the airframe and fuselage of the aircraft and killing 184. Altitude has nothing to do with the aerodynamic forces exerted on the plane. You’ve obviously never seen test footage of a 757 flying fast and low. They don’t just come apart. Wow.
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo no, it isn't..
@@marklewen9384 You can say that all you want, doesn't change the reality of the situation. Planes were hijacked by terrorists which crashed into buildings and one in a field.
There are literal videos of the planes hitting the buildings, there's recordings of phone calls of people on the plane, there's literal records of all the people on the planes.
@@subswithnovideos-oz4zo there is zero evidence of hijackers. The planes were flown from the ground. No plane hit the pentagon. Even the pilot who Flew the exact plane that supposedly hit the pentagon 300 times said he couldn't hit the pentagon without help from the ground. 19 hijackers who just learned to fly on single engine cessnas COULD NEVER DO IT.
You should ask a NASA person what’s up with the buildings on the moon
Where are the photos of airplane wreckage at the pentagon or in pa? I'd love to see them. Where are these photos?
Joe Rogan not understanding physics for 15 minutes
Well we have a member of NASA on tape admitting that we "lost" the instructions for apollo
@Kelly Arthur It's stupid 'cause you can't destroy what never existed in first place.
What are you trying to say?
@@alphanerd7221 Don't you know? After the moon travels NASA ""lost"" the technology and doesn't know how to do it again. Mysteriously it got destroyed, somehow, somewhere, after people started doing questions.
@@GranMaese Yeah that's BS. The did lose the designs for the Saturn 5 but they were never going to build it again. That really isn't any kind of point.
It isn't destroyed. The plans are in some filing cabinet in a room full of filing cabinets. It's not like they would have showed them anyway. They are classified. If NASA just never said anything you would have no idea.
The questions are stupid. Everyone who isn't dumb knows we went to the moon.
@@alphanerd7221 Damn, you are so nervous and scared, your passive-aggresive attitude demonstrates that. So gullible...
They were ""destroyed"" (never existed if you asked me). That's literally the reason they give on why they can't reach it ""anymore"". They are clueless on how to do it ""again"".
Everyone who isn't dumb and indoctrinated knows we did not go to the moon.
Joe "Believe the government account on 9/11" Rogan
to say 9/11 was inside job seems pretty obvious, but that's not to say everyone was in on the fix.
Those angled cuts don't naturally happen.
The 9/11 conspiracy theory is silly as fuck.
G.Gorrell what are you talking about it's proof the twin towers were engineered for an impact frrom a full size jet linear. Because of the plane that crashed into the new York skyline in the early 1920s
Definitely intervention of some kind. There's molten steel pouring out of the sides of the building before the towers fell. Joe has his 3 that he'll bring up: moon landing, northwoods, gulf of tanken. There is so much evidence of foul play in 911 but he always treats that as nuts. There is more evidence there than the moon landing that's for sure
Hollow earth and Antarctica are my favorite
Removing truth’s protective layers is just a poetic way of describing scientific progress, right? I think it’s pretty accurate.
You can tell old Joe is watching what he says now.
Yes and I really like that he doesn’t say that he doesn’t believe it but behind closed doors there’s so much more that I would like to talk about with joe Rogan
Oh shut up lol. Is there no end to yhe paranoia of you whackjobs? What's so hard to accept he has changed his mind after becoming better informed?? I hate to admit it but i once believed 911 was 'an inside job', but after some thorough research, it soon became evident there was no truth to any of the conspiracy claims.
This was filmed almost 5 years ago.... lmao
Seeing how people are losing lawsuits for defamation and others prosecuted for threats... freedom of speech is just an expression these days.
@@robby844 it was, but that still fits in with his comment. It's much longer than 5 years ago that Joe was very different to what he is now.
If they did show simulations and passed them off as the real thing...my next question would be why/how would you make a simulation to look exactly like space including the black background? Why go for over the top realism unless they were purposely trying to pull one over. I've seen some of the tests and simulations and they didn't bother making it look like it was in space. I'm with Joe, I'm not convinced either way but something squirly was going on. You know how you can be certain shady business was going on? Government was involved.
Have you…. Ever seen a Hollywood movie? It’s incredibly easy to fake a realistic looking background. Unless I misunderstood your comment
@@JA-jx1hk “why would they paint a background black, it’s easier to just go to the moon”
Great effort is made to prevent people from gaining an individual perspective by which we cannot be divided. The idea of questioning anything has been developed into an extremely effective point of division in fear of accusation that requires repetition to establish a safe zone by which we are not free to think for ourselves in normalized human behavior and acceptance. The concept of conspiracy has been developed beyond its original intent as a legal term regarding a case being adjudicated in court where it has specific meaning to come to a resolution according to the law. In any other context, it serves no value unless the intent is to distract and discredit in fear-based response on a shared basis by which no initiative remains in consideration on an individual basis. Group oriented behavior and identification has been the means by which the evolution of human affairs and events have been managed for as long as we can remember in human history as we know it today.
Shared compulsion of fear never needs to be acknowledged by which we then wait for others to take on the responsibility of writing the script going forward, through assumption based upon repetition no longer engaging or requiring the concept of initiative that equates to responsibility for any information or decision making -- an extremely serious evolution lest we regain a grasp on that basis -- when none have a clue who is responsible for so much concern for any serious issue and narrative public or otherwise. The perception of privilege in regard to any information and activity as a part of this process additionally provides much greater access to resources and decisions made, managed no differently than the public through the circulation of information with even less concept of where initiative lay as a part of the process. Much greater potential for deception is then possible than those means by which the public merely need be kept ignorant and occupied. Public programs can serve very well for this purpose as much greater technological developments can remain undisclosed for the benefit and advantage of a relative few, such efforts supported by inside narratives to justify keeping us in the dark as to a great potential that exists for all if such technologies were allowed into the public realm of awareness as well as an expansion of awareness that would occur with the disclosure of a much greater human history as well as past technologies more developed than what we enjoy today and at times a more integrated awareness on a spiritual and energetic basis versus the weaponization of religious perspective of a more arbitrary nature to render humanity in a more media oriented state to establish an outer perspective to describe the inner focus and identity, severely filtered and developing a media oriented mentality and guilt-based -- before the redevelopment of physical technologies for mass communication through print and electronic means that without a doubt have existed in our past . . while requiring anything else to define for us what is real and what makes us acceptable, unaccused and guilt-free, conditioning us to function in a lower compulsive version of ourselves based upon group oriented behavior and identification.
The compulsive need for agreement is the source of conflict by which we are not free to think for ourselves, by which we must watch one another and accuse the other side of any point of division -- and by which those who understand the process then support both sides for a longer term outcome in their interest, be it through war and any other form of political, cultural and social crisis that can be created and maintained on that basis.
No individual ever started a war of his own initiative. Any example to the contrary requires repetition, rather than comprehension in the context of events and the value of individual perspective. We don't need to love or hate anyone to restore individual sight. The individual perspective is the focus of power by which no person can be set against another with false or self-serving interpretations from another outside of ourselves.
Not one thread can be broken, lest individual awareness on an energetic basis of connectivity be restored under ones identity carried from birth. This is the nature of concern for an issue of an old space program using limited technologies that existed at that time in the public awareness. Every aspect of the Apollo program suffers from serious difficulties and discrepancies in the official record, only one of which render the entire program a theater for public consumption. Although near-Earth orbit is real, there are also indications of questionable activity concerning its veracity for some activities as demonstrated, regardless of hardware floating around in space. This is not in any way a denial of programs involving near-Earth orbit rather than specific activities that don't hold up under critical review.
Neil Armstrong saw aliens and had to keep quiet about it
How do you know then?
@@yassassin6425 The aliens told him
Oh, yeah. One more thing. If you're wondering why the astronauts are 'bouncing around' and 'springing back up' you might consider the fact that the astronauts were around 180 lbs each, and that their space suits each weighed about 180 lbs as well. (that's Earth weight guys). The Moon has about 1/6th Earth's gravity, meaning that the astronauts and their suits weighed about 60 lbs each on the lunar surface.
Since the astronauts were in excellent condition and were therefore only carrying around about 60 lbs (again on the Moon's surface), bouncing back up really wouldn't be that difficult.
Try to do what he did in a swimming pool
I’ll never get tired of hearing Joe try to say “Joint Chief of Staff”
Jamie got his thumbnail game to perfection. 😂 This is gold.
After all rhese years, i am on the same page with this. Totally.
I remember being in Creative Writing Class in the 7th grade. It was 1976. It was the first time I had ever heard about a possible moon landing conspiracy from my teacher. He wasn't an advocate but he planted the what if in my mind. I personally don't believe it. I think they went there and some of the scenes were filmed somewhere else like Joe said.😅😅
Well they did go there
@@edbeasant9494 can you prove that without a shadow of a doubt?
@@andrewgill2561 it's already been proven
@@edbeasant9494 how and by who?
@andrewgill2561 look I'm not getting into a discussion with some non-entity on UA-cam. If you don't where to look to do real research then there's no hope for ya. Bye.
For the astronaut standing up part, isn’t he using his left arm to grab onto the other astronaut right arm to stand up? I cant tell
It's either the other astronaut's hand or something on his suit.
@Ned Simlish im not agreeing or denying anything. Im just saying that if I weighed like 15kg instead of the 60 I actually weigh, i could probably pull that off. It could still be fake tho
@Ned Simlish also we weren’t there so we don’t know what actually happened. For all we know they could’ve stayed home that day or they could’ve gone to the moon and back twice. They could’ve even gone at the ISS for a beer and then came back down. Only they know what actually happened and unfortunately everything we’re left with are theories and speculations :/
Is he not pushing up with his right hand? Impossible on earth, but it seems plausible your tricep could do the job if you are strong and in low gravity.
@@stevejohnson2627that’s what it looks like
"we lost that kind of technology, we wish we could go back"
" We taped over all the video and data records from the moon landing"
- NASA scientist talking about going to the moon
I was literally yelling at my phone for him to play that clip..or to talk about them recording over all the original footage of the moon landing. Or the weird way they broadcasted it..by playing on a projector screen first than having a camera record that so it would be way more blurry and hard to see details. There's 1000 other things. But simple stuff like the way they broadcasted it on tv like that really points to hiding shit. There's no other reason to do it that way unless you were trying to hide shit...no other reason. Can you imagine if a guy shot a video of bigfoot today and he swore up and down it was the real deal. He makes a youtube video and he has the video shot in 420p than projected on to a screen than he records that screen with his phone and puts it up on UA-cam. Not a sole alive would look at that and be like yup looks lagit.
@@wickedliquid1177
Not today but 50 years ago?
We never went to the moon
@@wickedliquid1177 pics or it didn't happen
ua-cam.com/video/TFqCRd-6JQY/v-deo.html
I tested it and you can indeed stand up with one leg and one arm like that, and with 1/5 the gravity it would be easier
"That video is real. That's from Television."
🤣👌
you can watch the guy pull himself up using his left arm and his buddy lifting with his prospective right arm. he's not getting yanked up by wires. just watch it a few more times, the arms lifting are blocked a lot by the standing dude, but once you see it, its obvious that the guy on the right helps him up.
Not enough force is exerted by the standing guy to produce that kind of momentum
The fact that they sent a buggy and golf clubs when they had problems with weight says a lot.
Such a simple yet underrated comment and observation. You would think to find evidence alluding to it being fake you would have to do some complex deep dive but even a questioning a single detail like that makes sense. Those are non essential items and when traveling in space space and weight are very important.
The moon rover was a very useful vehicle Apollo 15-17 used to increase their range of exploration on the moon. As for the golf club, the astronauts were allowed to bring a personal item with them, and seeing as how a golf club and 3 golf balls weigh about as much as Alan Sheperd's ball sack, weight wasn't at all a concern.
@@nathan_w9236 they didn’t go to the moon. Buzz aldrin and Neil Armstrong are Freemasons. NASA is fake
They didn't take golf clubs.
@@nathan_w9236 Shepard did not take a golf club. He cannibalised some of the scientific equipment taken to produce a club.
In 1969 they only had cameras with photographic paper that would not have withstood the extreme temperatures that exist on a rock in space that has no atmosphere, from 250 degrees in the sun to minus 250 degrees Celsius
Wrong. Those temps refer to lunar SURFACE. Empty space has no temperature.
That's on the lunar surface. A vacuum is a perfect insulator, because there is no way for heat to transfer by convection or conduction - only solar radiation. Also, those extreme temps are only reached far into the lunar day, after about 14 earth days.
0:13
“what they did have is all sorts of pizza”
Considering the fact that the Moon lander was made out of popsicle sticks and tinfoil makes it even more incredible.
not to mention it was sealed by the most powerful device suited for space travel: duct tape
😂
That's what really did it for me. The fact it looks like some cheap prop used on an episode of twilight zone.
Did you hear Artemis flight was canceled due to a leak? This was supposed to be our return to the moon
@@teekaybe4016NASA is back in the money faking business...
With the whole “ he couldn’t have stood up like that without a wire” thing. If you look at the close up they give you see his arm is on his buddies right hand sleeve. I think it’s plausible that he could have given one good yank expecting it to take more force than actually required and it gave him the boost needed.
Agime jumping to play but falling and tearing open your space suit 260,000 miles from Earth. You get to be the lonelinest death in history
buddy standing up, look at his left arm. hes using the other dude to lift himself up
Joe understands that he can't be 100% honest on how he feels about certain subjects because it could cost him potential jobs in mainstream media. Smart on his part, still a little disappointing nonetheless
he defiantly sold out a few years ago
Your a moron what mainstream media work does he do? Maybe your just dumb as fuck and he's not.
He sold out when he was saying shit like "Bernie Sanders has insane beliefs about wealth..." like what.. that it should be used to make the world a better place for everyone and not just a dreamland for a select few? Fuck Joe Rogan I hope someone shivs him in the throat. Along with all these other shill fucks and sellout politicians... then move on to all the god damn rich 1% assholes who, last year, made over 80% of all the income in the world. There is no need for it. They are hurting people, killing people, and they don't care. They will not stop until they have anything and if we wait too long we aren't going to even have the strength to fight back at all. Which is what they are counting on... boil a frog slowly and what not.
HHstutz55 it's sad how people can't see this! Clear as day if your not brainwashed. I have listened to 90 percent of all joe's podcasts and definitely see what you see.
ScoutFighter #1 Sad that people can't see he will say anything to keep his luxurious life? What's actually sad is you don't realize that we do see it and that is exactly the fucking problem.