Zoroaster - Hindu-Born Persian Prophet

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 вер 2024
  • From Episode 111 of #AskAbhijit.
    WATCH FULL EPISODE: #AskAbhijit 111: History, Geopolitics, Current Affairs ► • #AskAbhijit 111: Histo...
    SUBSCRIBE to this channel ► www.youtube.co...
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ►UPI (G-Pay/PhonePe/Paytm): abhijitchavda@icici
    ►PayPal: paypal.me/Abhi...
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    JOIN #AbhijitChavda
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ★Twitter: / abhijitchavda
    ★Instagram: / theabhijitchavda
    ★Facebook: / theabhijitchavda
    ★Website:
    ★Email Inquiries: inquiries.chavda@gmail.com
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    #AskAbhijitChavda #AskAbhijitPodcast #Abhijit #Chavda #AskAbhijitShow #AbhijitChavdaClips

КОМЕНТАРІ • 694

  • @ShahanshahShahin
    @ShahanshahShahin 2 роки тому +603

    *_I'm a proud Zoroastrian (Mazdayasni) and proud Bharatiya 𔓙 ❤️ ॐ_*
    Zarathustra means Golden Camel

    • @ShahanshahShahin
      @ShahanshahShahin 2 роки тому +57

      @Sjrikk *Dear Mr. Troll:* _Although the Devas and Asuras of Sanatan Dharma share the same name as the Ahuras and Devans of Zoroastrianism, their meanings are significantly different._

    • @bhuvaneshs.k638
      @bhuvaneshs.k638 2 роки тому +21

      Wowwww i never met Parsis in my life.... Nyc to meet you dear brother
      R u in Twitter?

    • @bhuvaneshs.k638
      @bhuvaneshs.k638 2 роки тому

      @Sjrikk stfu dude just stoping third rated ppl

    • @scionofvishwamitra6232
      @scionofvishwamitra6232 2 роки тому +28

      @Sjrikk brother There are many asuras who were Good, eg. Varun and Mitra
      They were born as asuras but later attained their deva status.

    • @vedant4020
      @vedant4020 2 роки тому +30

      @@ShahanshahShahin don't consider yourself as bad bro..... Vedic people took knowledge, skill, weapons, technology from devas,daitya,gandharvas,marutas,yaksha and asuras but you mainly focused and trusted more in asuras it doesn't mean that you asked for help from evil.... Many asuras were great and devotee of God.... And not all the devas are good in similar way not all the asuras are good ..... Same is applied on us

  • @ReligioCritic
    @ReligioCritic 2 роки тому +271

    I always felt that Zorostrianism is a mirror image of Hinduism.

    • @ReligioCritic
      @ReligioCritic 2 роки тому

      @@rehankhan1778 They have many Gods dumbass. Ahura Mazda is the main but not the only one.

    • @reddevil8379
      @reddevil8379 2 роки тому +146

      @@rehankhan1778 Its 33 koti not crore. Get some knowledge. It's not ur arabic language that u follow without knowing it

    • @krishmajhi8801
      @krishmajhi8801 2 роки тому +88

      @@rehankhan1778 clear your information first.there are 33 types of God.

    • @aryanambekar3668
      @aryanambekar3668 2 роки тому

      @@rehankhan1778 Hindu's don't have 72 hoors waiting for them in heaven either. 😆😆

    • @ReligioCritic
      @ReligioCritic 2 роки тому +32

      @Vinay A If I'm not wrong then in Zorostrianism Devas are bad and Asuras are good.

  • @nirmalchandrabiswas6403
    @nirmalchandrabiswas6403 2 роки тому +213

    According to ancient Persian legends recorded in Shahnama, the history of ancient Iran begins with conflict of Ahuras (Asuras) and Daevas (Devas). Probably, Daeva or false god or evil spirit
    Ahriman posed a great challenge to Ahur Mazda. Gayomart or Keyumars was the first king of Zoroastrians or Iranians. He was also the contemporary of Ahriman. Daeva Indra was also an enemy of Ahuras. In all probability, Ahriman was Aryaman who was one of the Adityas of early Vedic period. Devas and Asuras of early Vedic period were cousin brothers. They were always in conflict for political supremacy. Puranic legends relate the legend of Tripurasura and his son Gayasura. Seemingly, Ahur Mazda (Mahasura or Asura Mahad) and his son Gayomart were Tripurasura and Gayasura. Avesta is the oldest text of Zoroastrianism. It is well known that there are significant similarities in the words and grammar of Avestan and Vedic Sanskrit languages. Avesta mentions Mithra, Varuna, Indra, Yama etc. Gathas of Avesta mention Rudra along with Angra Mainyu. Yajurveda’s
    one mantra (“नमस्ते रुद्र मन्यव”) also mentions Rudra and Manyu. Vedic and post Vedic sources indicate that Asuras also performed Yajnas. Gopatha Brahmana (1.1.10) refers to Asuraveda of Pratichyas (westerners) and Asita Dhānvan, an Asura Rishi. Asita is also mentioned in Avesta.
    Shānkhāyana Shrauta Sutra mentions about Asuravidyā. Evidently, Asuras compiled their own Veda for performing rituals. The same Asuraveda came to be known as Avesta. Unfortunately, a major portion of Avesta text is now lost. Seemingly, Asuras, cousin brothers of Devas compiled their own Veda. Many Vedic Rishis taught Vedic sciences to Asuras. Sukracharya, a famous Guru of Asuras was known as Kāvi or Kava Us or Kaikaus in Zoroastrianism. Sukracharya was the son of Kavi. He was referred to as Ushanas Kāvya in Rigveda Anukramani. Asuras evolved Avestan Sanskrit based on their own grammar from Proto Sanskrit. Thus, Vedic Sanskrit and Avestan Sanskrit have been artificially evolved and limited to only learned people. The common people of Asura community spoke Proto Iranian that was naturally evolved from Proto Sanskrit. It appears that the early Asuras had settled in Gāndhāra region on the banks of Helmand River. According to Vedic legends, Saramā Devashuni met Panis, a business clan of
    Asuras on the banks of Rasa River. Most probably, Rasa River was Helmand River of Afghanistan. King Bāhlika (Kuru dynasty) and King Gāndhara (Druhyu dynasty) conquered northern and southern Afghanistan respectively and established their kingdoms around 11100-11000 BCE.
    Asuras had no other option to migrate further westwards. They settled in Iran, Iraq, Syria and Southern Anatolia. Pani Asuras (known as Phoenicians in the west) migrated up to Atlantic Ocean and a group of Panis might have founded the city of Atlantis which was submerged by sea around 10000 BCE. When the monsoons weakened after 11000 BCE, many groups of Dānavas and Turvashas had also migrated up to Greece and Druhyus had migrated to Sumeria and Syria. Thus, the speakers of Proto-Sanskrit and Proto-Iranian languages laid foundation for the evolution ofall west Asian and European languages. Therefore, Proto-Sanskrit was indeed the mother of Proto Indo-Iranian and Proto Indo-European languages.
    It appears that the early Zoroastrianism of Asuras was extended from Iran to Southern Anatolia and posed a challenge to Danavas and Turvashas, the early settlers of Greece. Seemingly, there were at least two Zoroasters. The first Zarathushtra also known as Ashu Zarathushtra or Zarathushtra Spitama was the author of Gathas and Yasna Haptanghaiti of Avesta. Though Yayavara brahmanas of Rigvedic era had names like Jaratkaru etc. but Yayavara brahmanas always followed Vedic tradition. Sanskrit poets Bhavabhuti and Rajashekhara belonged to the clan of Yayavara brahmanas. Ancient Greek sources also refer to two Zoroasters. Hermodorus(10th century BCE) believed that Zoroaster I lived 5000 years before the date of Trojan war (1842 BCE). Eudoxus also placed Zoroaster I 6000 years before the lifetime of Plato (11th century BCE).
    Evidently, Zarathushtra I flourished around 7000 BCE and authored Gathas and Yasna
    Haptanghaiti of Avesta and recompiled Avesta. Zarathushtra I was like a Veda Vyasa of Zoroastrianism. He transformed Zoroastrianism into Monotheism and founded the basic tenets of Zoroastrian philosophy. This is how an Asuraveda transformed into Avesta and Zoroastrianism around 7000 BCE. Interestingly, Zoroastrianism accepted the Indian concept of Mahayuga of 12000 years that evolved after Ramayana era. Zoroastrianism followed equal length of four Yugas
    (3000 years of each Yuga) Instead of the differential duration (4:3:2:1) of four Yugas.
    Danavas and Turvashas of post Vedic era were the worshippers of Vedic devatas like Mitra, Varuna, Indra, Nāsatya and Agni etc. These Vedic gods had been transformed into Greek gods. 12 Olympian gods are like 12 Adityas of Vedic era. The common people from Afghanistan to East Europe prominently worshipped God Mithra. Gradually, Mitra became synonymous to Surya (Sun). Zarathushtra I’s monotheism also influenced the philosophy of Mitra god worshippers of East Europe. Thus, Mithraism was born in East Europe and became a popular religion before the
    birth of Christianity around 600-300 BCE. Mithraism has been meticulously destroyed and wiped out by the Christian fraudster scholars and their authoritarian kings.
    Probably, many Indian families of Balochistan and Gandhara had also migrated to Sumeria, Babylon, Egypt around 11000 BCE. Puranas indicates that the sons of Prachetas, a descendant of Druhyu dynasty migrated to west and became the kings of Mlechcha countries. Sumerians and Egyptians started learning the basics of Indian astronomy and mathematics in the post-Ramayana era. This is the reason why Sumerians and Egyptians also believed that their gods and ancestors reigned for thousands of years. Sumerians and Egyptians also followed the Yuga of 4,32,000 years. A group of Babylonians came under the influence of Zoroastrianism who evolved the philosophy of Judaism. Yavanas and Bactrians of northern Afghanistan and Turkmenistan learnt
    the Surya Siddhanta of Mayasura (6778 BCE) and evolved Yavana Siddhanta under the influence of Surya Siddhanta. Many familes of Yavanas had migrated to Greece and western Anatoliaaround 5000-4500 BCE and came to be known “Ionians” and “Javans”. These migrated Yavanas
    traced the Vedic origin of Greek gods & goddesses and introduced the Indian sciences to Greece.
    Consequently, Hellenistic Greek mythology and Hellenistic sciences have been evolved.
    Seemingly, Zoroastrianism was declined around 3000-1300 BCE due to the political rise of Egypt, Sumeria-Babylonia and Assyria. Persia was under the rule of Sumerians and Babylonians around
    3000-1700 BCE. The rising Buddhism also posed a great challenge to Zoroastrianism around 1800-1300 BCE. The Kayanian dynasty was reigning over Persia around 1700-1300 BCE. Zoroaster II was born in Magha country (North Bactria, North Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) around 1307
    BCE and revived Zoroastrianism. Since Magha was the birthplace of Zoroaster II, Zoroastrianism also came to be known as Maghism. Maghism or Later Zoroastrianism accepted the solar calendar and started celebrating Navroj. Kayanian king Gustaspa declared Zoroastrianism as the state religion. Acheamenids and Sasanians promoted Zoroastrianism. Unfortunately, the Zoroastrians of Iran and Turkmenistan had no other option to surrender to the barbaric Islamic invaders. The converted Magist Muslims (Zoroastrian Muslims) came to be known as Mughals who invaded and established their kingdom in India in medieval period. Thus, the glorious Zoroastrianism of Vedic era has been wiped out from Iran. Today, a micro minority community of Zoroastrians in India is struggling to preserve their glorious heritage.

    • @darkprince2490
      @darkprince2490 2 роки тому +10

      Rasa was likely the amu darya in central asia while the Helmand was the harahvaiti named after Sarasvati. Mughals were turks/uzbeks. Zoroastriaism was regular nonmonotheistic. There was no monotheism until Christianity (Judaism emerged at the same time as Christianity as a type of response to it)

    • @sreyanshuchaterjee3962
      @sreyanshuchaterjee3962 2 роки тому +3

      Buddha was around 500 BC. I assume you may want to correct your response, if not I may not take your seriously at all.

    • @adwaitvedant3297
      @adwaitvedant3297 2 роки тому +7

      In Rig vedas Aryaman (Ahriman) is a minor deva...Out of 33 prakar dev

    • @darkprince2490
      @darkprince2490 2 роки тому

      @@adwaitvedant3297 Hindu Gods cannot ever be minor

    • @adwaitvedant3297
      @adwaitvedant3297 2 роки тому +11

      In bhagwat gita asuras are described as materialists... bhogvaadis ...Who are interested in grabbing more wealth ....

  • @alimalhi6923
    @alimalhi6923 2 роки тому +286

    I wish we can get a condensed series on how Iran was part of India, Punjab's role in early history and it's relation to Haryanvis, Rajasthanis, Uttar Pradesh, Baloch/Sindhi and Kashmir as well. How far stretched out was India and the race which emerged from it...Goths/Jutland,etc.

    • @deepdsingh1994
      @deepdsingh1994 2 роки тому +15

      True, Punjab has really a influence from persia. Our language Punjabi is a mix of Hindi and Persian, Urdu. And culture is a bit derived from yemen.

    • @Aryanthakur-yt9bc
      @Aryanthakur-yt9bc 2 роки тому

      @@deepdsingh1994 how much bullshit do u have? This influence is very new due to slavery under abdallis

    • @nikhilPUD01
      @nikhilPUD01 2 роки тому +9

      All these regions are of Aryans.
      This is true that there is a migration of people from central Asia and also there is migration from india to Iran and from Iran to india.

    • @Aloksharma-oe1gm
      @Aloksharma-oe1gm 2 роки тому +21

      @@deepdsingh1994 Yemen ??? Where does Yemen come into picture

    • @umbrellacorporation5723
      @umbrellacorporation5723 2 роки тому +3

      Use #AskAbhijit

  • @kuru6212
    @kuru6212 2 роки тому +44

    Bahlik was central asia or northern Afg consisted, Greek used to call Bactria. King Bahlika and his grandson from Bahlik participated in KURUKSHETRA WAR. King Bahlika was brother of Shantanu and Uncle of Bheeshma. They were all KURUS( KAURAVAS).

    • @nirmalchandrabiswas6403
      @nirmalchandrabiswas6403 2 роки тому +4

      Central Asia was known as Uttarkuru during the Mahābhārat period in Dvapar yug

    • @kuru6212
      @kuru6212 2 роки тому +4

      @@nirmalchandrabiswas6403 UTTAR KURU is modern day Kyrgyzstan area, Bahlika, Tushara these places were situated in bank of river Chakshu/Oxus/Amu Dariya. Mentioned in mahabharat, at mahabharat times it was called Chakshu. In Vedic Sanskrit, the river is also referred to as Vakṣu (वक्षु). The Brahmanda Purana refers to the river as Chaksu which means an eye. The Avestan texts too refer to the River as Yakhsha/Vakhsha (and Yakhsha Arta ("upper Yakhsha") referring to the Jaxartes/Syr Darya twin river to Amu Darya)

    • @topg2820
      @topg2820 2 роки тому +1

      @@kuru6212 Even their modern names are in Sanskrit, Syr Darya is Surya/Sun river), Amu Darya is Soma/Moon river

    • @jayshukla4046
      @jayshukla4046 Місяць тому

      Even name of first Persian king is Kurush(Greek
      :Cyrus))

  • @sabareeshsv3180
    @sabareeshsv3180 2 роки тому +70

    8000 years old temple found in saudi arabia pls 🙏 need full details

  • @ShahanshahShahin
    @ShahanshahShahin 2 роки тому +159

    #AskAbhijit *_I want to share with you all something interesting: the word "Demon" in English is taken from the Latin word "Daemonium," which was itself derived from the Greek word "Daimon," which was ultimately derived from the Old Persian word "Daevan" (meaning evil or malicious spirit or creature) The Greeks adopted that moniker during the Greco-Persian Wars of Darius the Great (Dārayavaʰuš) and Xerxes the Great (Xšayaršah)._*

    • @संजयगोस्वामी-ग6ह
      @संजयगोस्वामी-ग6ह 2 роки тому +1

      Might surprise most Hindus but Kashmiri Hinduism have Devas, Asuras and third entity called Daeva who are evil. The likely equivalent for other Hindus will be Daeva = Raksasha.

    • @ShahanshahShahin
      @ShahanshahShahin 2 роки тому +3

      @जगत वसिष्ठ हा भाई उसका असली नाम मिडिल पर्शियन में गुश्तास्प Gustasp और ओल्ड पर्शियन में Vištāspa था वो तो यवनी लोग उसे hystaspes बुलाते थे।

    • @shreyanodoyto5975
      @shreyanodoyto5975 2 роки тому

      @जगत वसिष्ठ he was Zoroastrian

    • @shreyanodoyto5975
      @shreyanodoyto5975 2 роки тому

      @बलवंत no is from Fars which was before called pars it was in the south where the capital was

    • @topg2820
      @topg2820 2 роки тому +8

      Greek < Avestan < Sanskrit
      Darius < Dārayavaʰuš < Dharya Vasu, Upholder of Goodness
      Xerxes < Khashayarsha < Kshaya Purusha, Hero/Man who Rules

  • @hsram1985
    @hsram1985 2 роки тому +29

    Ahura is Asura Mazda. Asura Mazda is guru shukracharya. They worshipped guru shukracharya.

    • @ShahanshahShahin
      @ShahanshahShahin 2 роки тому +4

      Nah bro Ahuramazda is not Shukracharya.

    • @dkh8703
      @dkh8703 2 роки тому +9

      @@ShahanshahShahin Bhai Shukracharya was always doing these inverted things against devtaa. Look at early Zoroastrian Books and Believes. Asura fighting Devta all the time. Sometimes Asura win, sometimes Devta win. Both both respect Lord Shiva. Hence Shiv Statues are extracted from Iran, Syria, Near Caspian Sea regions.
      Only in recent there has been temples being excavated from locations in Saudi Arabia.

    • @paritoshthapliyal1520
      @paritoshthapliyal1520 3 місяці тому

      Varuna

    • @varunsharma3532
      @varunsharma3532 26 днів тому

      Hindi - Sindhi
      Ahura - Asura
      Yavahamana - namasavaya

  • @kangtheconqueror8238
    @kangtheconqueror8238 2 роки тому +21

    story of Atlantis also talks about an empire with 10 kingdoms, and then they got destroyed by a cataclysm.

    • @lostashmish
      @lostashmish 2 роки тому

      Sanatan was everywhere... then first cult of Xtianty came.. they appropriated all legends and knowledge systems, killed indic oriented philosophers and IMPOSED their "Believe this or die and go to eternal hell and blindly follow popes, pasters" kinda cult..
      Xtianty is version 1 of islam

    • @arjun-iv4wr
      @arjun-iv4wr Рік тому +5

      Mahabharat war

  • @TbhBro99
    @TbhBro99 2 роки тому +33

    Nietzsche chose Zoroaster as the spokesperson for his greatest work, Thus Spoke Zarathustra.

    • @nirmalchandrabiswas6403
      @nirmalchandrabiswas6403 2 роки тому +2

      They spoke Avestan

    • @ShahanshahShahin
      @ShahanshahShahin 2 роки тому +5

      @@nirmalchandrabiswas6403 My ancestors spoke various languages across various Era's from Airyanām Vajah (1500-800 BCE) to the Dabuyid dynasty (650-760 CE)

    • @nirmalchandrabiswas6403
      @nirmalchandrabiswas6403 2 роки тому +7

      @@ShahanshahShahin Unfortunately, the Zoroastrians of Iran and Turkmenistan had no other option to surrender to the barbaric Islamic invaders. The converted Magist Muslims (Zoroastrian Muslims) came to be known as Mughals who invaded and established their kingdom in India in medieval period. Thus, the glorious Zoroastrianism of Vedic era has been wiped out from Iran. Today, a micro minority community of Zoroastrians in India is struggling to preserve their glorious heritage.

    • @mrkps1986
      @mrkps1986 2 роки тому

      @@nirmalchandrabiswas6403 zoroastrian muslims???? Mughals are descendants of chengis khan and Timur, they converted from tengrism to Islam in 13th century, they were never zoroastrians

    • @ShahanshahShahin
      @ShahanshahShahin 2 роки тому +4

      @@nirmalchandrabiswas6403 Bro those Mughals were converted Turkic People who came from modern day Kyrgyzstan (Fergana valley) but they were culturally Persianized.

  • @Xhauej
    @Xhauej Рік тому +5

    ज़रथुस्त्र - हरितुष्ट्र
    ज़रनय - हिरण्य
    हज़ार - सहस्त्र
    दह - दस/दश
    हफ़्त हेन्दु
    हय्तुमन्त - सेतुबन्ध
    अबरसेन/उपारीसायन - उपरिश्येन(Hindukush)
    फ़ार्स - पार्श्व
    दस्त - हस्त
    दह्यू - दस्यू
    ऐरिय - आर्य

  • @pranavthorat856
    @pranavthorat856 2 роки тому +43

    There is a god in zoroastrianism called 'Mithra' the god of rising sun. According to Vedic scriptures 'Mitra' is another name of 'Surya' the Sun god. Is the Mithra and Surya are the same gods? #AskAbhijit

    • @topg2820
      @topg2820 2 роки тому +17

      Yes
      Mehran, Mihir, Mehrgarh, etc. are all named after Lord Mitra

    • @ShahanshahShahin
      @ShahanshahShahin 2 роки тому +15

      In Pre-Zoroaster times he was a deity alongside with Ahuramazda but in the Parthian empire he became the only God in Mithraism. However, sometimes around the first century BCE of the Parthian empire he once more changed into a Yazada or angel under Ahuramazda. He is also known as Mehr i or e Zhavedan (The Immortal Sun).

    • @rahulmojumder6936
      @rahulmojumder6936 2 роки тому +1

      @@ShahanshahShahin vai please increase ur population.

    • @sonofuniverse6355
      @sonofuniverse6355 2 роки тому +2

      ​@@ShahanshahShahin thanks for this information

    • @spidylov3382
      @spidylov3382 Рік тому +8

      Yes Mitra is among 33 Koti supreme Deities of Vedic Religion
      12 Adityas
      8 vasu
      11 Rudra
      Mitra and Prajapati / 2 Ashwin Kumara
      Total 33 🙏

  • @Rishi123456789
    @Rishi123456789 2 дні тому +1

    You are correct that Zoroaster was a Hindu-born Persian prophet, Abhijitji.

  • @sarcasticpandit6705
    @sarcasticpandit6705 2 роки тому +22

    Gurudev 🙏🏼🕉️

  • @umanathbashiam3063
    @umanathbashiam3063 2 роки тому +34

    abijit ji...
    sir...i am Sourashtrian
    we all 44 / 108 gotras scattered and migrated
    and settled in tamilnadu / south india...
    we just identified as
    silk-thread traders and weaving expertise..as saurashtri linguistic ethenic guilds with
    gotra/ family house name
    identies...Vedic culture most
    worship is sun goddess...
    we also identified as
    sun goddess worshippers in early dawn nature..
    we do also have saurashtri priests for our own spritual rites
    we say sun goddess in our indegenious saurashtri language as Surit-h...deivun .
    surit- h....
    pronounced by arabha ka
    and parsika as Sorath...
    finally eurosians named it as
    Surat...like so...
    saur-appa corrupted as
    harappa ...( s replaced by H )
    saras wat means
    the wayleave to get accumulated...
    like so...
    zara thustra
    may be corrupted from
    surit- rashtra which means
    sun divine lands ... obviously ancient hindoo vedic sun worship culture..
    coalzae ( coal ) burnt ...then
    nhirush ...and inside the nhirush
    thermal exists...
    that thermal ...is called by
    saurashtri as Vhistav..
    which is also worshipped
    by our mothers during
    rice cooking ...hence this
    vhisthav would have been corrupted as Avestav ..
    which could be later on
    becoming fundamental for religious ceremony...rituals .it is my personal view ..even in Rome ..there is Vestav temple
    but not meant for exact reasons. in saurashtri
    yellow is called as
    halduno .....zarat may be as yellow in ancient Sanskrit.
    but in my opinion...a greater sourasenam existed ..including
    ancient greater Iran...which worshippers are
    Agni deivun or sun goddess...
    but today zoroastrians are
    Farsi linguuism with parasika - islamic inclinations...the language would have got influence over Indic languages but we Sourashtrian today performan all the six sects of
    Hinduism...with indegenious
    palkar language... preserved by us... though invasions were there in South guzarat ..Lata Pradesh for more than ten centuries one by one ...
    thanks ji

    • @drsatyamupadhyay
      @drsatyamupadhyay 2 роки тому

      Interesting

    • @rasikadurbule3025
      @rasikadurbule3025 2 роки тому

      Awesome

    • @DevaEkoNaaraayanah
      @DevaEkoNaaraayanah 2 роки тому

      Sauraashtra word itself tells about it connection with Sun.

    • @Drisht4
      @Drisht4 Рік тому

      You have used the word "corruption" what kind of corruption are you referring to? unable to understand that part.

  • @Aman-uc5iu
    @Aman-uc5iu 2 роки тому +44

    Sir, please discuss the DASRAJAN WAR. your videos are very captivating and intriguing. I almost watch your uploads every day. also please please share a glimpse of your library. will be delighted to have some of your collections on my shelf. 😀😀🤗😇😊

  • @AntiFurryJihad
    @AntiFurryJihad Рік тому +7

    Zoroastrianism is not dharamic, it's a neither ambrahemic but is monotheist religion like Ambrahemics. All Zorastrians say they are monotheist only Hindu call them polytheist.
    So how is Zorasterian Invesion of Hibduism.

    • @Lala-kc2fw
      @Lala-kc2fw Рік тому

      Zoroastrians believe in one god, while the others (Pre Zarathustra) God's back then. Now, similar to those of "Saints" you could say. We do not worship them, we acknowledge and respect them but pray to one God. Ahura Mazda, Good thoughts. Good words, good deeds

    • @greaterbharat4175
      @greaterbharat4175 Рік тому +3

      Dude zorostrians literally call their philosophy or principal as dahman or dahm ( clasic Persian) , which by all scholar says it is related to indo Aryan term Dharma , dharman or dhamma ( Pali )

  • @shreyaschaubey1358
    @shreyaschaubey1358 2 роки тому +26

    Sir for few days I have been watching , serial ahilyabai and I'm very fascinated to know about Malhar Rao(Subedar of indore) , who established its kingdom in Indore. Can you please tell some unknown facts about the king (Malhar Rao). And was he one of the most underrated kings in the Indian history??

    • @sycrox5201
      @sycrox5201 2 роки тому +1

      He was a great military leader fought side by side with peshwa bajirao to expand maratha empire and he also helped raghunath Rao to expand maratha empire to attock

    • @GyanTvAmit
      @GyanTvAmit 9 місяців тому +1

      yeah he was maratha,he was maratha empire's commander

  • @sproutupllc6845
    @sproutupllc6845 2 роки тому +13

    Your knowledge is Godlike ❤️🇮🇳

    • @Ak-qq2le
      @Ak-qq2le 8 місяців тому +1

      all bullshit.. Iranins are also aryans so, old parsian is sister language to sanskrit. in those days hinduism of present days was not there. for ex. puranas were not there. so most of our pauranic gods dint exist. calling the hindus is non-sense. their religion also took some values from proto-aryan religion. for ex. sky father etc. ( from which jupyter also came )
      The ancient Iranian people, who inhabited the Iranian plateau and its borderlands, as well as areas of Central Asia from the Black Sea to Khotan (modern Hotan, China), shared a common ancestry with the ancient Indo-Aryan-speaking peoples of the Indian subcontinent 1. The northern Iranians, who occupied the steppes, differed significantly from the southern Iranians. In religion and culture, both the northern and southern Iranians had much in common with the ancient Indo-Aryan-speaking peoples of the Indian subcontinent, although there was much borrowing from Mesopotamia as well, especially in western Iran 1. The term “Aryan” was used as an ethnocultural self-designation by ancient Iranian peoples, in contrast to an an-airya (‘non-Arya’). It designated those who belonged to the ‘Aryan’ (Iranian) ethnic stock, spoke the language and followed the religion of the ‘Aryas’ 2. The ancient Iranian religion was diverse and had many beliefs and practices. It was followed by the culturally and linguistically related group of ancient peoples who inhabited the Iranian plateau and its borderlands, as well as areas of Central Asia from the Black Sea to Khotan (modern Hotan, China) 1. The religion of the ancient Iranians has had a profound influence upon the Middle East, as also the Middle East upon Iran 1. The conquest of the Achaemenian dynasty by Alexander the Great is considered as a somewhat arbitrary date for the close of the period of ancient Iranian religion, even though these influences have continued through later history and some forms of Iranian religion have persisted to the present day 1. It is important to note that ancient Iranian religion is often treated apart from Zoroastrianism 1

  • @DharmaRakhsha
    @DharmaRakhsha Рік тому +6

    On being Persia and India essentially rooting from the same culture this is a meaningful and correct examination although it is the opposite way that means vedas moved from Iran to India not the opposite but anyways I guess Abhijit is being patriotic today…

    • @XXYYZZ99
      @XXYYZZ99 4 місяці тому +3

      No it moved from India to Iran. It is not patriotism but plain facts. Aryavarta and Aryanvaeja both been original home of noble people. It is described in both sources as between snow mountains and a 7 river system that flows mightily from Mountains to the sea. There is no such place in the world where 7 major rivers exist and originate in snow mountains that is Himalayas. There are no such river system in present Iran, or Afghanistan and never was or anywhere else. Avesta further has described Aryan or Ariyanem Vaeja as the first and best of the 16 lands or kingdoms created by Ahura Mazda. 16 Mahajanapadas does ring a bell dosent it ?

  • @mrkps1986
    @mrkps1986 2 роки тому +21

    Pre zoroastrian religion or ancient Iranian religion was like Vedic religion but both of these religions started at the same time period and were contemporary to each other, no one is ancestor of anyone but exactly begins or started at same time

    • @playhard719
      @playhard719 2 роки тому +2

      Then what is it then.

    • @mrkps1986
      @mrkps1986 2 роки тому +5

      @@playhard719 i supposed to write like Vedic religion, i written 'not' by mistake.

    • @ghs89
      @ghs89 2 роки тому +2

      Abhijit chavda doesn't know anything. He just gives statements which fit his right wing propaganda.
      He also said that ahoms were always hindus which is false. Ahoms converted into hinduism in 17th century.

    • @mrkps1986
      @mrkps1986 2 роки тому +1

      @@ghs89 before converting to Hinduism what was the religion of ahoms

    • @nirmalchandrabiswas6403
      @nirmalchandrabiswas6403 2 роки тому +6

      @@mrkps1986 According to ancient Persian legends recorded in Shahnama, the history of ancient Iran begins with conflict of Ahuras (Asuras) and Daevas (Devas). Probably, Daeva or false god or evil spirit
      Ahriman posed a great challenge to Ahur Mazda. Gayomart or Keyumars was the first king of Zoroastrians or Iranians. He was also the contemporary of Ahriman. Daeva Indra was also an enemy of Ahuras. In all probability, Ahriman was Aryaman who was one of the Adityas of early Vedic period. Devas and Asuras of early Vedic period were cousin brothers. They were always in conflict for political supremacy. Puranic legends relate the legend of Tripurasura and his son Gayasura. Seemingly, Ahur Mazda (Mahasura or Asura Mahad) and his son Gayomart were Tripurasura and Gayasura. Avesta is the oldest text of Zoroastrianism. It is well known that there are significant similarities in the words and grammar of Avestan and Vedic Sanskrit languages. Avesta mentions Mithra, Varuna, Indra, Yama etc. Gathas of Avesta mention Rudra along with Angra Mainyu. Yajurveda’s
      one mantra (“नमस्ते रुद्र मन्यव”) also mentions Rudra and Manyu. Vedic and post Vedic sources indicate that Asuras also performed Yajnas. Gopatha Brahmana (1.1.10) refers to Asuraveda of Pratichyas (westerners) and Asita Dhānvan, an Asura Rishi. Asita is also mentioned in Avesta.
      Shānkhāyana Shrauta Sutra mentions about Asuravidyā. Evidently, Asuras compiled their own Veda for performing rituals. The same Asuraveda came to be known as Avesta. Unfortunately, a major portion of Avesta text is now lost. Seemingly, Asuras, cousin brothers of Devas compiled their own Veda. Many Vedic Rishis taught Vedic sciences to Asuras. Sukracharya, a famous Guru of Asuras was known as Kāvi or Kava Us or Kaikaus in Zoroastrianism. Sukracharya was the son of Kavi. He was referred to as Ushanas Kāvya in Rigveda Anukramani. Asuras evolved Avestan Sanskrit based on their own grammar from Proto Sanskrit. Thus, Vedic Sanskrit and Avestan Sanskrit have been artificially evolved and limited to only learned people. The common people of Asura community spoke Proto Iranian that was naturally evolved from Proto Sanskrit. It appears that the early Asuras had settled in Gāndhāra region on the banks of Helmand River. According to Vedic legends, Saramā Devashuni met Panis, a business clan of
      Asuras on the banks of Rasa River. Most probably, Rasa River was Helmand River of Afghanistan. King Bāhlika (Kuru dynasty) and King Gāndhara (Druhyu dynasty) conquered northern and southern Afghanistan respectively and established their kingdoms around 11100-11000 BCE.
      Asuras had no other option to migrate further westwards. They settled in Iran, Iraq, Syria and Southern Anatolia. Pani Asuras (known as Phoenicians in the west) migrated up to Atlantic Ocean and a group of Panis might have founded the city of Atlantis which was submerged by sea around 10000 BCE. When the monsoons weakened after 11000 BCE, many groups of Dānavas and Turvashas had also migrated up to Greece and Druhyus had migrated to Sumeria and Syria. Thus, the speakers of Proto-Sanskrit and Proto-Iranian languages laid foundation for the evolution ofall west Asian and European languages. Therefore, Proto-Sanskrit was indeed the mother of Proto Indo-Iranian and Proto Indo-European languages.
      It appears that the early Zoroastrianism of Asuras was extended from Iran to Southern Anatolia and posed a challenge to Danavas and Turvashas, the early settlers of Greece. Seemingly, there were at least two Zoroasters. The first Zarathushtra also known as Ashu Zarathushtra or Zarathushtra Spitama was the author of Gathas and Yasna Haptanghaiti of Avesta. Though Yayavara brahmanas of Rigvedic era had names like Jaratkaru etc. but Yayavara brahmanas always followed Vedic tradition. Sanskrit poets Bhavabhuti and Rajashekhara belonged to the clan of Yayavara brahmanas. Ancient Greek sources also refer to two Zoroasters. Hermodorus(10th century BCE) believed that Zoroaster I lived 5000 years before the date of Trojan war (1842 BCE). Eudoxus also placed Zoroaster I 6000 years before the lifetime of Plato (11th century BCE).
      Evidently, Zarathushtra I flourished around 7000 BCE and authored Gathas and Yasna
      Haptanghaiti of Avesta and recompiled Avesta. Zarathushtra I was like a Veda Vyasa of Zoroastrianism. He transformed Zoroastrianism into Monotheism and founded the basic tenets of Zoroastrian philosophy. This is how an Asuraveda transformed into Avesta and Zoroastrianism around 7000 BCE. Interestingly, Zoroastrianism accepted the Indian concept of Mahayuga of 12000 years that evolved after Ramayana era. Zoroastrianism followed equal length of four Yugas
      (3000 years of each Yuga) Instead of the differential duration (4:3:2:1) of four Yugas.
      Danavas and Turvashas of post Vedic era were the worshippers of Vedic devatas like Mitra, Varuna, Indra, Nāsatya and Agni etc. These Vedic gods had been transformed into Greek gods. 12 Olympian gods are like 12 Adityas of Vedic era. The common people from Afghanistan to East Europe prominently worshipped God Mithra. Gradually, Mitra became synonymous to Surya (Sun). Zarathushtra I’s monotheism also influenced the philosophy of Mitra god worshippers of East Europe. Thus, Mithraism was born in East Europe and became a popular religion before the
      birth of Christianity around 600-300 BCE. Mithraism has been meticulously destroyed and wiped out by the Christian fraudster scholars and their authoritarian kings.
      Probably, many Indian families of Balochistan and Gandhara had also migrated to Sumeria, Babylon, Egypt around 11000 BCE. Puranas indicates that the sons of Prachetas, a descendant of Druhyu dynasty migrated to west and became the kings of Mlechcha countries. Sumerians and Egyptians started learning the basics of Indian astronomy and mathematics in the post-Ramayana era. This is the reason why Sumerians and Egyptians also believed that their gods and ancestors reigned for thousands of years. Sumerians and Egyptians also followed the Yuga of 4,32,000 years. A group of Babylonians came under the influence of Zoroastrianism who evolved the philosophy of Judaism. Yavanas and Bactrians of northern Afghanistan and Turkmenistan learnt
      the Surya Siddhanta of Mayasura (6778 BCE) and evolved Yavana Siddhanta under the influence of Surya Siddhanta. Many familes of Yavanas had migrated to Greece and western Anatoliaaround 5000-4500 BCE and came to be known “Ionians” and “Javans”. These migrated Yavanas
      traced the Vedic origin of Greek gods & goddesses and introduced the Indian sciences to Greece.
      Consequently, Hellenistic Greek mythology and Hellenistic sciences have been evolved.
      Seemingly, Zoroastrianism was declined around 3000-1300 BCE due to the political rise of Egypt, Sumeria-Babylonia and Assyria. Persia was under the rule of Sumerians and Babylonians around
      3000-1700 BCE. The rising Buddhism also posed a great challenge to Zoroastrianism around 1800-1300 BCE. The Kayanian dynasty was reigning over Persia around 1700-1300 BCE. Zoroaster II was born in Magha country (North Bactria, North Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) around 1307
      BCE and revived Zoroastrianism. Since Magha was the birthplace of Zoroaster II, Zoroastrianism also came to be known as Maghism. Maghism or Later Zoroastrianism accepted the solar calendar and started celebrating Navroj. Kayanian king Gustaspa declared Zoroastrianism as the state religion. Acheamenids and Sasanians promoted Zoroastrianism. Unfortunately, the Zoroastrians of Iran and Turkmenistan had no other option to surrender to the barbaric Islamic invaders. The converted Magist Muslims (Zoroastrian Muslims) came to be known as Mughals who invaded and established their kingdom in India in medieval period. Thus, the glorious Zoroastrianism of Vedic era has been wiped out from Iran. Today, a micro minority community of Zoroastrians in India is struggling to preserve their glorious heritage.

  • @shreyanodoyto5975
    @shreyanodoyto5975 2 роки тому +5

    The language of east Iran was Avestan it was close to Sanskrit but slightly different

  • @anmoltiwari5314
    @anmoltiwari5314 2 роки тому +3

    Actually, they were like the rebellious teens who rebelled against their Mother Religion, that's it.

  • @vishaltripathi5483
    @vishaltripathi5483 2 роки тому +10

    Pranam sir. Invasion was history. Invasion is present(russia invading Ukraine) And invasion is the future. What is the future of Hindustan? Initiating a invasion or getting invaded?

  • @anishsalanirtamang
    @anishsalanirtamang 2 роки тому +4

    According to Prophet Zarathustra, two forces operate in our universe, one which is good which emanates from the goodness of Ahura Mazda and the other one which is evil (Angra) whose purpose is to destroy and corrupt the good in the material world.... So there is constant conflict between these two forces since the beginning of the Universe....

  • @sanatanihind1
    @sanatanihind1 2 роки тому +10

    SANATAN
    has neither starting nor ending 😎
    Power of SANATAN

    • @justicebydeathnote
      @justicebydeathnote 2 роки тому +1

      @@rehankhan1778 tu kya hasra h be
      tere poorvaj bhi hindu hi the lol

    • @sanatanihind1
      @sanatanihind1 2 роки тому +5

      @@rehankhan1778 islam sirf ek religion he par SANATAN ek dharm he ।😎
      Isise tum soch sakte ho difference।
      Yehi kuch 100, 200 saal pehle kisine Beth ke kuch likh liya aur ye gadhe usse manne bhi lag gye 😂

    • @shoaibhaq8680
      @shoaibhaq8680 Рік тому

      Ghanta kuch bhi lol ashoka se pehle to hinduism ka ata pata hi nahi tha kyunki sanskrit language hi nahi exist karti thi, toh kaha se sanatan dharam ka koi shuruwat nahi hua anwaiye kuch bhi bina sar pair kuch bhi claim kar lo yahi hai yahi hai hinduo ki philosophy aaj kal.. Lol

    • @SouthAsianProdigy
      @SouthAsianProdigy 4 місяці тому

      Yes Tanatan, I can see your gods face 😂
      🐵🐒🦍🦮🦧🦮🐕‍🦺🐯🦌🐅🦄🐎🐂

  • @prannoypatel
    @prannoypatel 2 роки тому +6

    FIRST!!! Abhi Sir huge fan love ur content thank u so much!!!

    • @ghs89
      @ghs89 2 роки тому +1

      He spreads pseudoscience. He works for BJP.
      It's hard to believe how even educated indians are also being trapped by BJP agents

  • @wandelhok8142
    @wandelhok8142 18 днів тому +1

    There is no sound for 'Z' in Sanskrit let alone the entire name 'Zarathustra'.

  • @ivarhakuse8572
    @ivarhakuse8572 2 роки тому +3

    Ahura Mazda is Asura Medha, Divine Light

  • @Kanakkhatri_1703
    @Kanakkhatri_1703 2 роки тому +9

    #AskAbhijit Gurudev You always said that Bharat need $10 trillion economy , What steps we should take after achieving this mark.

  • @mehernawazmondegari4973
    @mehernawazmondegari4973 8 місяців тому +4

    Please give your references and sources for information.

    • @Higgghjk
      @Higgghjk 7 місяців тому +1

      Google
      Of course Wikimedia

    • @quyacx_Editz
      @quyacx_Editz 3 місяці тому

      @@Higgghjkthose are not credible sources used by any scope

    • @alexvegetables7856
      @alexvegetables7856 3 місяці тому

      This guys speaks like an Indian nationalist. Take everything with a grain of salt

  • @krishnaaggarwal3953
    @krishnaaggarwal3953 9 місяців тому +4

    There's a beautiful ballad called the ballad of king vahram, composed during the tough times of iran, asking for help of hindus to save them

  • @immortalbeing196
    @immortalbeing196 2 роки тому +5

    before Zoroastrianism, both Indians and Persians followed ancient Indo-Iranian religion and it is still found in present days Zoroastrian traditions and Hindu traditions with slight variations.

    • @arindamsardar3897
      @arindamsardar3897 2 роки тому +3

      This irano aryan religion is same as vedic Hinduism but different from zorastrianism

    • @immortalbeing196
      @immortalbeing196 2 роки тому +2

      @@arindamsardar3897 yes, but not very different, it is like how Buddhism differs from Hinduism that's it. Zoroastrianism also still has Indo-Iranian(Vedic) elements in it, even Yazidism also has many similarities with Hinduism. Indic-Persian-Babilonyan-Assyrian culture has strong cultural links. But currently, most of those cultures vanished because of later Islamic invasions.

    • @indianboy59
      @indianboy59 Рік тому

      ​@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 why not?

    • @essaadeel3676
      @essaadeel3676 9 місяців тому

      ​@@immortalbeing196
      Babylonians and Assyrians were semitic, they have nothing to do with Indo-Iranians

  • @jitendrainamke646
    @jitendrainamke646 2 роки тому +2

    Every origin is from bharat. But due to kaliyuga the world has become ignorant.
    That's why ignorant people made abrahamic religions which is basically kali himself. And thats why they are questioning gods of hindu gods.
    But as kaliyug comes to an end all these
    religions will come to end.

    • @undefeatableyt7
      @undefeatableyt7 2 роки тому +3

      True, that. Only Sanatan is the real religion

    • @hindurashtra63
      @hindurashtra63 2 роки тому +2

      In the case of Persia, Alexander's conquests was disastrous for Persia. The Greeks changed all the Old Persian names into Greek. This is why Americans and Europeans who are into History and Archaeology relate everything about Persia to Christianity and Judaism. They don't understand Persia was closer to Indian Civilization than any other Civilization.

    • @indianboy59
      @indianboy59 Рік тому

      Lol

  • @moobutt
    @moobutt 11 місяців тому +7

    Zoroastrians would tell you it’s not polytheistic

  • @hemkeshyeole4630
    @hemkeshyeole4630 2 роки тому +14

    I tried to search meaning or reason behind bharat I finally have a theory to it thank you . I would really like listen the whole story of nation being called bharat , now named as INDIA (Independent Nation Declared In August) I laugh sometimes how country with 100 + languages has its name in a foreign , when the land had a civilisation way before this language was even discovered

  • @kinginthenorth7548
    @kinginthenorth7548 11 місяців тому +2

    Asuras and devas doesnt means bad and good , in vedas both asura and deva is used for indra... asura was a title used for brave and strong... i would rather say them adityas(sons of aditi) and daityas(sons of diti) .. so if ahura is asura then it doesnt mean persians worshipped evil.. ahura is used for that strong celestial being , it could be either adityas or dairyas

  • @vivekkapoor668
    @vivekkapoor668 2 роки тому +7

    This expanded my instinctive speculation on the connection between the great people of Persia and Bharata - thank you!

  • @beastwars5789
    @beastwars5789 Рік тому +3

    Persians did not come from India, there is much evidence to support this as well as how Indians actually came from Iran especially from the Elam region.

  • @tejasbafna1997
    @tejasbafna1997 2 роки тому +14

    Sir if possible even explain origin of Jainism and its importance

    • @prithvimhatre5510
      @prithvimhatre5510 2 роки тому +8

      @@rehankhan1778 cope sheeth lol you muslim are contradictory if I put different Quran verses quran will expose itself

    • @Kl_kanhaiya13
      @Kl_kanhaiya13 2 роки тому

      @@rehankhan1778 madarchod yaha Tere chuuslim ki baat nhi Ho rahi 😂😂😂😂

    • @raghavannaidu6931
      @raghavannaidu6931 2 роки тому +13

      Jainism is one to the sects of Sanatan Dharma like Buddhism, Shivaism, Krishnaism, Vedantism.
      So it follows the basic Dharmic Structure and has a different perspective to achieve Mukti.

    • @raghavannaidu6931
      @raghavannaidu6931 2 роки тому +20

      @@rehankhan1778 Hinduism is not a word in the Vedas. It is Sanatan Dharma for us word meaning "Eternal Laws" which help you reach Mukti.

    • @ghs89
      @ghs89 2 роки тому +1

      @@raghavannaidu6931 jainism and buddhism are not sects of hinduism.
      You hindu nationalists are annoying af. Why do you guys claim everything?
      Jains and buddhists rebelled against brahmanism and those vedic rituals. Hindus mass murdered buddhists.

  • @suniltapashetti5156
    @suniltapashetti5156 2 роки тому +4

    The defeat of the Persians was not in the "Battle of 10 Kings". In this battle Persians were on the side of the victor. It was in a later Varshageera battle where Persians were defeated and pushed eastwards. The protagonists of both sides are referred in both the rig-veda and the avesta.

    • @pratikbagul4196
      @pratikbagul4196 Рік тому +1

      Battle of ten kings fought between king sudas(dev) and other alliance of 10 kings(asur). In this battle king sudas won and other kings territories were pushed westwards i.e in Iran. After that the people in iran started praying asuras and not devas as these 10 kings were asur and king sudas was considered dev. Therefore in avesta asura is good and deva is bad but in rigveda its viceversa.

    • @KosherHasbara
      @KosherHasbara 10 місяців тому +2

      ​@@pratikbagul4196 due to worship of lord Indra due to heavy rains the rivers flooded and the few among the 10 kings got drowned and lost... Thts why they opposed Indra worship.

  • @dionisiodussart5629
    @dionisiodussart5629 11 місяців тому +1

    Interesting theory.
    According to westerner scientists, the Aryan culture was born at the BMAC (Bactriana Margiana Archeological Complex) aka Oxus Civilization, after its deadly collision with Iranians. And it's the the Indo-Aryans who fled then, due to continuous arrival of Iranians from Central Asia (Andronovo Culture)... And some of them fled to the west : they founded the Kingdom of Mittani in Anatolia and Syria, whereas many of them crossed the Khyber Pass and arrived to Gandhara.
    Iranians too were "aryanized", like this actually disastrous Zoroaster whose religion turned out later to be a transition point to islam. Only the Indo-Aryans kept faithful to their polytheistic religion, which is why India kept its essence (in spite of another disastrous religion : buddhism).

  • @mindrani3784
    @mindrani3784 Рік тому +2

    Interesting to know this version. In the version I heard, Zoroastrian is distortion of Saurastrian, which was deemed the land of Surya siddhanta/ Philosophies … like how Kashmir is the land of Shaiva Siddanta. From what I learnt, the whole of India back then could be categorized into multiple regions with each region being specialized in one philosophy…Like the extreme north/Kashmir being Shiva, East/Banga desa being Shakti, West / Saurashtra being Surya, Central being Ganesha, South/ Travidha(Today’s Dravida) being Skanda also known as Kumara or Karthikeya etc.. Coming back Zoroastrian , it sounds plausible because Zoroastrian’s even today are worshippers of Sun God.

  • @deous9062
    @deous9062 2 роки тому +2

    Zarathustra was also in Frederick Neizsche Book , Thus spoke Zarathustra

  • @proaltraplay
    @proaltraplay 4 місяці тому +1

    Oh lord shiva thankyou for this beautiful world and this day
    Om namah shivay 🕉️🛐🔱🐚

  • @manessvijay
    @manessvijay 2 роки тому +6

    so Zarathustra is yet another evidence Aryans came from Central Asia

    • @AJAYSINGH-ns1vv
      @AJAYSINGH-ns1vv Рік тому +3

      Opposite that aryans gone from India.

    • @indianboy59
      @indianboy59 Рік тому

      ​​@@AJAYSINGH-ns1vv Indo-European migrations happened way before Zoroaster even existed. And there were tribal religions in Central and East India at that time which were distinct from Vedic beliefs which later got assimilated.
      Your claim presupposes the idea that India as defined by the modern-day borders was always one civilisation with one religion when the evidence suggests otherwise. The word "Hindu" came much later.

  • @Jackcamomile
    @Jackcamomile 3 місяці тому +1

    Could you tell me if it is possible to find someone like Angra Mainyu in Hinduism? Do you know similar rakshasas?

  • @TilikumMolly
    @TilikumMolly 4 місяці тому +1

    For me, Hinduism is a further development of Zoroastrianism. There are too many branches and deviations from Zoroastrianism to Hinduism due to the undeveloped tradition of writing. This condition, over time, made the process of inheriting the teachings of monotheism contained in Zoroastrianism become very vague due to various deviations in the branches of Hinduism.
    The above situation is very natural due to the process of teaching knowledge and beliefs only relying on oral traditions, which were very strong at that time. And indeed, many religious teachings have deviated over time. This fate was not unique to Zoroastrianism.
    Unfortunately, when the tradition of writing began to strengthen, and Zoroastrian/Hindu religionists began to write down their religious teachings (in smriti and sruti), what happened was that each branch leader confirmed each branch of Hinduism and its respective deviations. So this is what we see and accept today.

  • @ranapratapsingh3416
    @ranapratapsingh3416 Рік тому +1

    Small correction. The language and culture of west Iran was Elam and Jiroft culture. Vedic culture and religion only penetrated eastern Iran.

    • @ranapratapsingh3416
      @ranapratapsingh3416 Рік тому

      @@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 It is not South western Iran. Parsavas are mostly Eastern Iranian people. Vedic people don't know much about elamites.

  • @aryanpandey8262
    @aryanpandey8262 2 роки тому +3

    Do a bookshelf tour 🔱🚩🔱

  • @soniyasinha3496
    @soniyasinha3496 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for sharing this fascinating piece of history....

    • @PropertyinSingapore
      @PropertyinSingapore 2 місяці тому

      It is not fascinating. We are zoroastrians. His story is far from the truth

  • @umanathbashiam3063
    @umanathbashiam3063 2 роки тому +3

    sir...
    in Saurashtri...
    magha means weaving ..
    yuezhi means spinning

  • @foruse8981
    @foruse8981 2 роки тому +3

    Hello sir
    What is your view on Bal Keshav Thackeray?

  • @qtube8403
    @qtube8403 2 роки тому +7

    Rock music is also originated from vedic dharmic sanatan civilisation

  • @jeneralbrigader8478
    @jeneralbrigader8478 2 роки тому +9

    #ask sir are there any proves for the battle of ten kings?
    is it possible that there were more other civilizations in India during the Saraswati civilization or older than it?

    • @RS-lv1cm
      @RS-lv1cm 2 роки тому

      It's too old to find any direct evidence .
      Infact it's pretty hard to even prove world War directly.
      Only through literature evidence we know that world War really happened but thats basically just stories nothing else.
      We can only educated guesses, for example if we go and see London today we will hardly find any building older than 1940s indicating large scale destruction during that time hence the evidence of war.
      Similarly, you would find broken weapons and cities of that era like Rakhigiri indicating war but that's it.

    • @AnimeCritical
      @AnimeCritical 2 роки тому +2

      Battle of 10 kings are considered history.

    • @AnimeCritical
      @AnimeCritical 2 роки тому +2

      @Ravishanker R And for most of what is considered history, we dont even have that.
      Let me remind you that Dasrajanam yuddha is considered history by mainstream historians.

  • @noone6952
    @noone6952 Рік тому +1

    आप गलत है, ऋषि कश्यप के दो पत्नी दिती और अदिति से हुए वंशों का ही नाम सुर और असुर हुआ , और असीरिया मैं असुरों या अहुरो का वास हुआ जिसे हम आज असीरिया के नाम से जानते है, वो पर्शियन ही थे। सुरों या देवों ने जो वास किया वो कलक्रमश ब्राह्मण वैदिक संस्कृति बनी। और असुर भी वैदिक देवो की पूजा करते थे तो , दोनो ही वैदिक सांस्कृतिक है।

  • @thehour6571
    @thehour6571 2 роки тому +12

    It seems this man knows everything 🤣

    • @franky7388
      @franky7388 2 роки тому

      Why laughing??

    • @undefeatableyt7
      @undefeatableyt7 2 роки тому +2

      He's Indian JP

    • @dkh8703
      @dkh8703 2 роки тому +4

      Go and learn Sanskrit. For some stone pelter this might be a joke but someone who knows sanskrit well can easily see what he's talking about.

    • @rahuldhowan1994
      @rahuldhowan1994 2 роки тому +1

      He's a certified liar. This video in particular is full of bull shit

    • @Phoenix-King-ozai
      @Phoenix-King-ozai Рік тому

      @@undefeatableyt7 God No
      He's nothing like JP
      and I mean that as a compliment despite not being a JP hater

  • @Sauron2609
    @Sauron2609 2 роки тому +7

    #AskAbhijit Namaskar Abhijit.
    I've been listening to your podcast for a very long time now. Kudos to you people of our country are slowly realizing the glorious past of the motherland. Anyway my question to you was that -- We all know Iosif Stalin belonged to the CCCP and was heavily influenced by Karl Marx's works and in Lenin's reign was appointed the head of the politburo of USSR. Was he following a communist ideology when in power. I personally feel his rule was more of a "RED FASCISM" rather than communism. What's your take on this.

  • @ahoorawstupp781
    @ahoorawstupp781 Рік тому +1

    My name clearly says ahoora for a reason ahura

  • @hormazddoc4244
    @hormazddoc4244 2 місяці тому

    As a Parsi Zoroastrian, I strongly disagree. Zoroastrianism is the world's oldest monotheistic religion. We have only one God Ahura Mazda. Then we have divine beings the Ameshaspands and Yazads.

  • @topg2820
    @topg2820 2 роки тому +1

    Avestan Zarathustra < Sanskrit Hiraṇyauṣṭra, both meaning 'Having Golden Camels' (Zaranya = Hiraṇya)

  • @Hey-Yes-you-yes-you-
    @Hey-Yes-you-yes-you- 2 роки тому +14

    Sir plzzz explain the "Khas Aryan" history of Uttarakhand, Nepal, Himachal and J&K

    • @aniruddhbahuguna5462
      @aniruddhbahuguna5462 2 роки тому

      Entione

    • @aniruddhbahuguna5462
      @aniruddhbahuguna5462 2 роки тому

      Khas of uttarakhand was origin from Nepal and later settlement Kamboja and came back to Nepal. In history it should not modern time reffered Aryan it stand for nobl6 but khas are Vedic first mentioned in Mahabharata.

    • @saanjanibaar8085
      @saanjanibaar8085 2 роки тому +1

      @@aniruddhbahuguna5462 which history are you learning bro?

    • @saanjanibaar8085
      @saanjanibaar8085 2 роки тому +2

      They call themselvs Aryan now but in ancient Hindu literatures they are called to be non-Aryan Mlechas along with Kiratas. It means clearly they atleast were earlier not Indo-Aryans or atleast non-Vedic tribes. Irranian Saka, Hunas who destroyed Hindu temples were also mlecchas.

    • @aniruddhbahuguna5462
      @aniruddhbahuguna5462 2 роки тому +1

      @@saanjanibaar8085
      Please read concept of Arya. They were non Vedic culture followers. Word Arya stand for now noble.

  • @HutanBeringin89
    @HutanBeringin89 Місяць тому

    Yajna in sanskrit is Yasna in Iran zoroastrianism., and in Balinese Hinduism in Indonesia is Yadnya.. meaning ritual, ceremony or sacrifice. In Balinese they have 5 types of yajna; Deva yajna, Pitra yajna, Rshi Yajna, Manusya yajna, and Butha yajna.

    • @subratamukherjee682
      @subratamukherjee682 16 днів тому

      Aryans were in India from the beginning, they did not come from home

  • @26gargi
    @26gargi 2 роки тому +1

    Zara means old. He was Zaratkaru, a sage who had condition to marry the woman who has the same name. Vasuki's sister name was also Zaratkaru and vasuki was told to marry her with Zaratkaru and their son Astika will be born as a savior of Nagas. Astika stopped the Sarpayagna of Janamejaya ans thus saved Nagas. All significance of Zarathustra is so save Nagas from current politics. Mazda is Mazdarendra (Mazda Indra).

  • @27NaV73
    @27NaV73 2 роки тому +7

    Prophet of Asuras. It's really simple. We worship 'Order out of Chaos'. They worship 'Chaos out of order'

    • @shashankmishra7691
      @shashankmishra7691 2 роки тому +8

      @@rehankhan1778 i think that both of them are better than copy paste religions.

    • @khosrowanushirwan7591
      @khosrowanushirwan7591 2 роки тому +4

      @@rehankhan1778 Till you realise Islam absorbed a lot of zoroastrian traditions

    • @siddeshnaik2296
      @siddeshnaik2296 2 роки тому +1

      @@rehankhan1778 you are not required and welcome here stay out

    • @undefeatableyt7
      @undefeatableyt7 2 роки тому

      @@rehankhan1778 Atleast better than worshipping pedophiles

    • @27NaV73
      @27NaV73 2 роки тому +1

      @@rehankhan1778 Lmao the day you'll realise the Pagan origins of your religion you'll be having the shock of your life. And fyi, nothing is fake in this world. Neither is yours fake nor is any other religion fake. We worship what we resonate with. It's as simple as that. You resonate with beheading so worship it. 👍🏻
      We have a beheading god too. He's called Rudra. But we worship the Sattva qualities within him, while you worship the Tamas with Tamasic things.

  • @VK-wf9qe
    @VK-wf9qe 2 роки тому +2

    Avesta language, also has a word called Dahman which is avesta dialect for the world dharma. And in sanatana Dharma it is known anyone who followed the laws of Dharma are Aryas. Even the Yazidi Kurds follow a form of vedic/zoroastrian religion in north western Iran and into Anatollia. We know Mitanni Kings in That region were following a later form of Indo Aryan Dharma. The vedic Arya culture of India comes from the fusion archaic Sanskrit speakers from
    Southern Caucasus and Indus archaic proto Tamil /proto Elamite speakers from Balochistan and Indus Valley. I believe that after this fusion of proto yogic shavite culture of Indus and archaic proto archaic Sanskrit from southern Caucasus the vedic Aryan culture came into being in the Saraswati civilization and spread west into Iran and Anatolia.

  • @nihitoraon4507
    @nihitoraon4507 2 роки тому +1

    He is zoro from one piece.

  • @JustMe54328
    @JustMe54328 8 місяців тому

    I think roughly what I heard was that Zarathustra was a priest who was seeking knowledge from the divine, he received knowledge from a divine light that communicated to his mind and that’s how Mazda yasna was revealed.
    Sadly Alexander’s army and Arabs destroyed the writings and today we can only guess about the origin of the religion

  • @hariunnithan9
    @hariunnithan9 Рік тому +4

    Zarathushtra means 'Golden CAMEL'. Zara has the same root probably as Zari/Jari, the fine golden thread used in textiles. Ahura Mazda` is Asura Medha (The God of Wisdom), most likely Varuna one of the oldest Vedic Gods. Varuna was also referred to as Varunasura in some older portions of the Rg Veda.

  • @RezBabe
    @RezBabe 8 місяців тому +2

    Zoroastrianism is monotheistic, that is ONE GOD i.e. Ahura Mazda.
    Hinduism is polytheistic, meaning MANY GODS as in many Gods in the Hindu faith.
    These are the facts of the matter!
    What are you teaching exactly here, Mr Chavda?
    You are confusing your followers or trying to revise many thousands of years of Iranian and Hindu brotherhood and friendship that is the common heritage of both civilizations?
    For your information, both ancient people started as one but split because of philosophical differences and as such there was neither ahead nor behind the other since both civilizations and their respective languages existed in one region of the world.
    There's enough tension and ethnocentric people that cause nothing but futile and destructive hatred and competition via lies and false history. Iranians and Indians have been together as Aryans, if you claim that one was before or was somehow more significant, you are deceiving your followers. I know our common ancestors and their noble spirit would be harmed by such senseless and destructive historical revisionism.
    May you see the light of wisdom brother!

    • @subratamukherjee682
      @subratamukherjee682 16 днів тому

      We Aryans lived in India from the beginning and did not come from outside

    • @RezBabe
      @RezBabe 15 днів тому

      @@subratamukherjee682 This is the kind of reply I expect from a believer but I don't blame you since I know thzt you did not comprehend what I stated and something there, triggered you! I pray that you become WISE one day. You have my compassion!

  • @omkarunde743
    @omkarunde743 10 місяців тому

    3:11 He might be citing the Dasrajna Battle or the Battle of Ten Kings where Sudas won and established the Kuru kingdom. Maybe Iranians were one of the Aryan tribes who lost the battle of ten kings. It has been described in Rigveda.

  • @Raghav__Pandit
    @Raghav__Pandit 2 роки тому +3

    Life me ek baar aap se milne jarur aaunga guru jii 🙏🙏

  • @Raghav__Pandit
    @Raghav__Pandit 2 роки тому +1

    Mujhe english nahi aati hai phir bhi main aapka har ek video dekhta hu

  • @akhilsrinivas004
    @akhilsrinivas004 2 роки тому +1

    The whole conclusion is they are Vedic Hindus 😂 I don't know y they left there original religion n form there own dummy religion which has been influenced from ancient Vedic hindu religion 😂.

    • @undefeatableyt7
      @undefeatableyt7 2 роки тому +1

      That's what I was thinking😂

    • @hindurashtra63
      @hindurashtra63 2 роки тому +1

      There is no need to look for Ancestor of Persians, It is already known if you have enough knowledge of Hindu Scripture. Mahabharata mentions of Kingdoms that support Kauravas - The Sindhus and The Kambhoja who lived beyond the Sindhu River.
      Kambhoja are understood as Ancient Persians. How ? There is a mention of "Bhoja Clan" of North West India (Modern day Pakistan) that migrated West near Kumuda Mountains. These people were known as "Kama-Bhoja". So Persians are just cousins of "Bhoja" Clan of Ancient India.

    • @AJAYSINGH-ns1vv
      @AJAYSINGH-ns1vv Рік тому

      Because with time some things can be used so badly that they need to change Or to make them as they originally were but it's difficult to make them same as they were truly so change is only way. They misused the dharmik ways so to correct or make somewhat dharmik new ideology was originated with divine grace but with time it also become misused.

  • @vinnychavda7117
    @vinnychavda7117 2 роки тому +1

    So does that mean that zarathustra parent's were Hindu's ?

    • @siddeshnaik2296
      @siddeshnaik2296 2 роки тому

      hindu is a geographical identity u can call dharmic sanatani vedic

    • @vinnychavda7117
      @vinnychavda7117 2 роки тому

      @@siddeshnaik2296 ok so was he Vedic then ?

    • @hufrishsethna2235
      @hufrishsethna2235 2 роки тому +1

      No, they followed a faith known as Mazdayasani. That faith and Hinduism had a lot in common because they developed on either side of River Indus simultaneously, so there was a lot of cultural and religious exchange between the two faiths. Later on Zarathustra founded Zoroastrianism

  • @anandrao5646
    @anandrao5646 Рік тому +1

    This has to be traced to the DasRajya Yidha or Battle of Ten Kings of pre or early Rig Veda. The battle was between two forces of tribes ...one which believed in the Vedas and its lifestyle and the other which wasn't so convinced. This battle led to the defeat of those forces which didn't believe in the Vedas and Vedic rituals...and they were driven out to the far side beyond the Sindhu river...they went away carrying some traces of their past, including fire God Agni and their Guru- Shukracharya...the Preceptor of the Asuras as per our tradition. Asura - Ahura...Mazda...the Gid of Ahura or Asuras. Agni - Fire was the God...but everything else was the exact opposite....because they opposed the Vedic people of the Bharata Puru clan and their preceptor like Vishwamitra, Vasishta

  • @rajvora27
    @rajvora27 10 місяців тому

    the battle of the ten kings is the Mahabharata, the right side one and we wrote the book and a new religion began , disseminating the pre Vedic religion of Jainism

  • @Expectrum09
    @Expectrum09 2 роки тому +6

    You are the best Abhijeet Sir you are amazing and your all videos is very informative 💯💯💯😍

  • @aakashuikey778
    @aakashuikey778 2 роки тому +1

    #AskAbhijit tell us about history of Gondwana land, Adivasi, is Gondi culture and Hinduism same?? or not

  • @notatroll78
    @notatroll78 2 роки тому +2

    Darius and cyrus exactly told in many stone writings that the only god ahura mazda , i think you should study more or just visit perspolis in shiraz so you realize that zoroastrianism is has only 1 god and is ahura mazda

    • @Yogis_BitterTruth_Nirvan
      @Yogis_BitterTruth_Nirvan 2 роки тому

      I think it is abrahmic influence on them which infects their minds.

    • @notatroll78
      @notatroll78 2 роки тому

      @@Yogis_BitterTruth_Nirvan not really , jewish religion was made 2900 years ago while zoroastrian was made between 3700 to 3200 years ago and persian and medes didn't had that much relation to middle east before median and echeamanid empire

    • @justicebydeathnote
      @justicebydeathnote 2 роки тому

      exactly like vedic hinduism
      where it is said there is only one supreme consciousness, that is omnipresent
      and it has demi gods which they call daevas,
      read up avestan texts
      you will get to know more
      zoroastrians do yajnas, have a sacred thread ceremony similar to hindus
      there are just wayyyyy to many similarities to say these religions arent connected

    • @notatroll78
      @notatroll78 2 роки тому

      @Aditya Kumar Pandey thats the thing , they rejected it

  • @kanha3548
    @kanha3548 2 роки тому +1

    So now I got it y these religions are against Hinduism because they all were defeated in a battle then the Vedic culture was like their enemy so they all converted and started different different religions

  • @umanathbashiam3063
    @umanathbashiam3063 2 роки тому +1

    ji...
    magha whinas bhavan ...we ourselves with pride chat ourselves

  • @snoopyguy6765
    @snoopyguy6765 Рік тому +1

    Zoroastrianism was the dominant religion of Persia and Prophet Zarthusthra was born in Central Asia.Even the oldest hymns of Zoroastrianism is older than Sanskrit language. The polytheistic religion of Iran and the ancient Vedic religion of India were both polytheistic religions, but they had some key differences and none of them are related.

  • @roguegamer2020
    @roguegamer2020 2 роки тому +1

    I heard that Iranian worship the asuras instead of the devas

  • @umanathbashiam3063
    @umanathbashiam3063 2 роки тому +1

    ji...
    SOURASHTRians ...performing
    their spiritual rituals by YAJUR vedic ....vedic Hinduism sect .

  • @kjaudio1
    @kjaudio1 Рік тому

    He wasn't Hindu. He was Mazdayasni Aryan.

  • @AronAroniteOnlineTV
    @AronAroniteOnlineTV Рік тому +1

    Ahura masta is a name for Agni in rig and atarva veda.Entire riks address agni as ahura masta.One branch of vedas broke off after battle of 10 kings.It was a heretical branch of brigu angiras i guess, the other branch was bharata and bharat dwaja.They are not hindu but heretics. They viewed devas as evil and shunned yagyas.They viewed ashuras as divine.probably proto puranic deva ashura divide.Note judaism derives from burning bush of Moses.Abraham or Aviram was certainly hindu worshiping Trinity but later redacted into yahweism.

  • @umanathbashiam3063
    @umanathbashiam3063 2 роки тому +1

    sir ...
    saurashtri are silk threads weaving alongwith Brahmin ritual performance by gotras .
    hence ... Brahmins with silk ( pashuuth ) threads weave

  • @UmeshKhanna2
    @UmeshKhanna2 Рік тому +1

    A very unknown interpretation.

  • @rajeevranjan8680
    @rajeevranjan8680 2 роки тому +2

    Jai Hind 🇮🇳🚩

  • @संजयगोस्वामी-ग6ह

    Wonder who was Ahura Mazda? Asura of wisdom..
    The most wise and knowledgeable Asura in vedic culture would be Ravan who composed great works like Shiva Tandav strot

    • @nirmalchandrabiswas6403
      @nirmalchandrabiswas6403 2 роки тому +1

      @@VSM101 The phonetic similarity with Bagadatta, mentioned by Krishna as powerful king of the Yavanas cannot be dismissed lightly, as Bagadates means ‘Given by God’ in Old Iranian. The meaning is the same for Bhagadatta also. Datta means given. Bhaga is another name for Sun. Bhagadatta is he who has been given by the Sun. Bhagadatta as a friend and vassal of Jarāsandha and as an old friend of Pandu, in good relationship with Yudhishtira can be expected to have taken back home many Vedic practices and principles. From Krishna's words, it is known that he had a special relationship with Jarāsandha.
      The phonetic similarity between Jarāsandha and Zoroastrian lends credibility to the view that the religious codes followed by the followers of Jarāsandha came to be known as Zoroastrian religion or sect. Almost all the friends of Jarāsandha were in the West. Those who shared friendship with Jarāsandha but preferred to stay in the west followed the same Vedic religion of Jarāsandha, but some of them kept off from mainstream Vedic India. The isolation caused by this could have given rise to their Vedic life becoming different in due course.
      The Vedic knowledge they had taken with them had become stagnant or mutated in course of time in the wake of reduced connection with mainland India after Jarāsandha was gone. That is how we have come to see some similarities between Zoroastrian Avesta and the 8th Mandala of Rig Veda. (refer Shrikant Talageri)
      The 8th Mandala is unique in that the name Krishna is mentioned at quite a few verses. {This will be written in another article}. What is being highlighted here is that parts of 8th Mandala of Rig Veda was formed in Krishna’s times or a little later and people who have gone to the west of India had knowledge of it. With passing of times, parts of that knowledge had found their way into Zend Avesta.

    • @productofsociety4107
      @productofsociety4107 2 роки тому

      Wrong

    • @spidylov3382
      @spidylov3382 Рік тому +1

      No Ashura of Wisdom is the teacher and leader of Ashura who was Sukracharya and literally Ashura Medha was name of Sukracharya teacher of Ashuras 🙏
      Medha word became mazda 🙏

  • @arpitkadyan1171
    @arpitkadyan1171 2 роки тому +1

    #askabhijit If slavery didn't existed in ancient India
    Then how did doryodhan won pandavas during the gamble.
    It is pretty clear that he owned all the 5 pandavas as none of them did anything when draupadi was being humiliated.
    Can you please answer this question ?

    • @sachisin1924
      @sachisin1924 2 роки тому

      @@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 right this arpit guy need to read indica (megasthenes' accounts of ancient india) instead of contemplating anything out of thin air.

  • @ranapratapsingh3416
    @ranapratapsingh3416 Рік тому +1

    Viewers please see carefully the presence of of Zoroaster in Rig Veda. RV . 7.9.6 तवामग्ने समिधानो वसिष्ठो जरूथं हन यक्षि राये पुरन्धिम | Vasiṣṭha, when enkindling thee, O Agni, hath slain jarutha ( Zarutha-Ustra - Zoroaster ) . Give us wealth in plenty. Mandala 7 is classified as Middle book by Shrikanth Talageri.

  • @vrajakisori6888
    @vrajakisori6888 Рік тому

    as per purana at the beginning of kaliyuga, kalipurusha create Mlecha dharma and one of them is Zoroaster and from it down to Abrahamic relegion

  • @PRAyush-fi7hz
    @PRAyush-fi7hz 2 роки тому +3

    #AskAbhijit please recommend a book from where I can learn chanakya's teachings.

  • @Sunshine_3027
    @Sunshine_3027 Рік тому

    I think because they were defeated they caused the inversion, where devas become evil

  • @greatkaafir7478
    @greatkaafir7478 Рік тому +1

    Persian Language Was Prakrit Apbhras Of Old Sanskrit Language
    Zarathustra Means Old Camel Or Yellow Camel
    Zarathustra Was The Fonder Of Akkheminid Empair ( Hakchamani Empair ), Its Believed To Born In Bulkh ( Afghanistan )
    Zoroastrian Is Inversion Of Vedic Dharma
    In Vedas Deva's Have Position Connotation's And Ashura's Have Kind Of Negative Connotation's
    In Zoroastrian System Deva's Became Evil And Ashura's Became Good
    Before Zoroastrian The Culture Of Persian Was The Same As Culture Of India
    Zoroastrian Is Not Monolithic Religion
    The Persian's Are The Descendants Of An Ancient Indian Clain That Were Defeated In Great Vedic Era Battle Of 10 King's ( It Was More Then 10 )
    The One Of The Defeated Clain Was The Parsw Clain Or The Parshu Clain
    They Scape Westward, All The Clain Were Defeated Expelled Out Of India To Scape In Order To Survive
    It Was Bharat Under The Great King Sudhash Who Won This Conflict ( Because Of That India Is Know As Bhaart ) |

  • @MrMesmerizerGaming
    @MrMesmerizerGaming 2 роки тому +5

    I would suggest everyone to search "ancient Iranian religion " you'll get your answer of how Iranians worshipped Vedic Deities like Mithra (mitr) and Agni and Chief of Asur (Ahura Mazda/Asur Medha).
    Asuras are described in Indian texts as powerful superhuman demigods with good or bad qualities. In early Vedic literature, the good Asuras are called Adityas and are led by Varuna, while the malevolent ones are called Danavas and are led by Vritra, the evil serpent.
    The only thing that distinguishes "Asura who become Deva" from "Asura who remain Asura" is intent, action and choices they make in their lives.
    And who is the chief of Asur in Hinduism? Shukracharya.
    Even though I love my Parsi people, Zoroastrian is just an inversion of Hinduism, a rebellion or opposition to the normal culture and idea in Ancient Iran which was Hinduism.
    It's still similar because it took everything from Vedic religion and just switched names, but the rituals still remained.
    I would still suggest my Parsi people to convert to Hinduism :) or Ancient Iranian Paganism which is the same.
    Come to the side of Devas. 🙏

    • @MrMesmerizerGaming
      @MrMesmerizerGaming 2 роки тому

      @@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 True , I agree, I used it for easy understanding.
      Dharm is not Religion.

    • @shehnazsethna4498
      @shehnazsethna4498 2 роки тому +2

      The fact that you called Ahura Mazda the "Chief of Asur" just goes to show your knowledge and understanding of the Zoroastrian religion. I would have actually educated you and corrected the flaws in your statement, but I don't want to waste my time on a fanatic.

    • @shehnazsethna4498
      @shehnazsethna4498 2 роки тому +1

      Also you are literally saying that Indian Vedic religion is Paganism and that is exactly what Zoroaster said Zoroastrianism is NOT. When you put such comments on public platforms, please be very careful of what you post and be more responsible.

    • @MrMesmerizerGaming
      @MrMesmerizerGaming 2 роки тому +1

      @@shehnazsethna4498 I am sorry if I offended you, not my intention,
      I didn't call Ahura Mazda as Chief of Asur, I called Shukracharya as Chief of Asur in Hinduism, just trying to correlate the cognate.
      Zoroastrianism is the first monotheist religion born out of the inversion of Hinduism/Ancient Iranian religion.
      I don't hate Parsi people but you have to know how your religion came to be.

    • @shehnazsethna4498
      @shehnazsethna4498 2 роки тому

      That's exactly what I'm saying. There are similarities because both the religions flourished simultaneously on either side of the Indus. So when you say "it's an inversion" you're basically saying that Zoroastrianism is propagating anti-Hindu sentiments. That's quite scandalous on your part, don't you think?
      Also, I am able to speak about my religion precisely because I KNOW what I am saying.

  • @Rameshkumar-qw5ug
    @Rameshkumar-qw5ug Рік тому

    Zara means hungry and thirsty thrusta rejected full meaning the person who wins above hungry and thirsty

  • @rati54
    @rati54 2 роки тому +8

    Your explanation is totally wrong

    • @Yogis_BitterTruth_Nirvan
      @Yogis_BitterTruth_Nirvan 2 роки тому +2

      Then what is your explaination and how does it explain dasarajna yuddha including Saurastrians (Saur rashtiya/ Sun kingdom) migration out of India?

    • @Yogis_BitterTruth_Nirvan
      @Yogis_BitterTruth_Nirvan 2 роки тому

      @@ashilyjustin4748 toh sach kya he? British missionary ki najayaj aulad