Why Did Huns Destroy Takshashila University?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
- From Episode 111 of #AskAbhijit.
WATCH FULL EPISODE: #AskAbhijit 111: History, Geopolitics, Current Affairs ► • #AskAbhijit 111: Histo...
SUBSCRIBE to this channel ► www.youtube.co...
SUBSCRIBE to the main channel ► www.youtube.co...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
►UPI (G-Pay/PhonePe/Paytm): abhijitchavda@icici
►PayPal: paypal.me/Abhi...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOIN #AbhijitChavda
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
★Twitter: / abhijitchavda
★Instagram: / theabhijitchavda
★Facebook: / theabhijitchavda
★Website:
★Email Inquiries: inquiries.chavda@gmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
#AskAbhijitChavda #AskAbhijitPodcast #Abhijit #Chavda #AskAbhijitShow #AbhijitChavdaClips
Taxila is a British mind set
Takshashila is a pride
Delhi is a British mind set
Dilli is emotion.
@@kuru6212 Delhi is foreign mindset its Indr prasth
@@romilchaudhary7011 Indra parstha is very ancient name of Delhi, Dilli is mideval age name given by the founder of Dilli, Tomar Rajputs, Tomar are direct descendants of King Parikshit ( Son of Arjun). But Indraprastha is a solid name.
@@kuru6212 your name hhahahha 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@kuru6212 Parikshit was son of Abhimanyu and grandson of Arjun
Taxila what's Taxila it's Takshashila. Abhijit Sir is such a great sigma male.
Speaking basic fact doesn't make you a sigma male.
😱
He'll ask you for evidence lol, because there is no scientific backing for these alpha, sigma bullshits.
He is a brilliant man
🙏🏾🙏🏾
Takshashila Unviersity situated in Takshashila City and Takshashila city was founded by Bharata ( brother of Rama) , he established this city as per his son's name ( Taksha ). In mahabharat Takshashila has mentioned when Bhima visited to this city.
Even Lahore is named after Shree Ram's son Luv.
@@अंकुशझा-स2ङ yes Lavapuri, inside Lahore fort, there is a temple dedicated to Lava.
Mahabharata never fucking happened
@@epicaunleashed8764 Hahahahaha... here the Madrasachap got entered, Flat earth living beings.
@@epicaunleashed8764 please tell me the name of 6 ancestors of your Fuckng Christ/ Hazrat.
We had such great warriors who throughout their lives kept fighting the invaders and some Mr Gandhi taught us to throw weapons and let the enemy beat the shit out of us.
It was the people who choose Gandhi as their leader. Majority moved behind Gandhi. While Lal, Bal and Pal had less no. of followers. People should have discarded Gandhi if they knew even a little knowledge of Geeta. To be honest majority Indians were coward. It'd be better to research and study why they had become so much coward.
@@nishantkumar6960 Indians were not cowards, Turks converted whole Persia into a muslim state, they converted whole Afg into muslim state because 90% Afg was under Buddhist Non violent ethics only Indian kings ( Rajputs, Marathas, Jats, Ahoms, South Indian Kingdoms, Sikhs) resisted them and won many battles against them, thats why they failed to convert whole India as a muslim state, even britishers also failed to conquer whole india through military power they got defeat too, thats why they made princlely states. The main things Indian makes coward those are 1) Distorted Education System 2) Disgusting Law & Order by britishers. This education system makes us weak, this education system is full of distortion, they glorified the invaders but never said about true kings of India that what we learn from school and when we grow up we just denied the facts, called them as bullshits, myths etc, britishers called vedas are nonsense but they took it to their country and studied on it and we indians accepts what britishers said. After 47 Pseudo secularism, anti hindu media, marxist influencers, convent education system makes us extreme coward and weak and the great symbol of cowardness of Indians are " Gandhi is our Nation's Father". Gandhi is responsible and some rich indian kings were redponsible too make indians weak.
@@nishantkumar6960 nah Indians didn't chose Gandhi but freedom.
Didn't care how it came though.
@@kuru6212 totally agreed with you
@@nishantkumar6960 if Indians were coward today you would be living in Islamic Republic of India. Even after so many years of invasions India is the only country which is Hindu majority.
Every branch of orthodox Hinduism allowed this open inquiry, and allowed debate within various sects. Buddha’s debates with the orthodox Sanātana Brahmins are the best example of this approach. Buddha was every inch a Hindu, but he differed from the orthodox view on the question of existence of the Ātman (loosely translated as the eternal soul). Hindus and the followers of Buddha debated the question for over a millennia till Hinduism won a final victory led by the Ādi Shankar.
Literal meaning of Atman is 'individual unit of consciousness', it can also be translated as soul, but people have many different conceptions of the word 'soul'.
When was the first time adi shankara charya comes in indian timeline .Again a 14th ce inscription mention someone with that name .No southern king or even northen kingdom ever mentioned Adi shakaracharya
@@prashantsingh1280 Moving Gautama Buddha from the 19th century BCE to the sixth century BCE has resulted in a cascading effect that has resulted in the denial of many historical figures their rightful place in history. The most prominent name among these luminaries is Ādi Śankarāchārya, who was one of the greatest intellectuals India has produced. As we know, he was the greatest proponent of the Advaita Vedānta philosophy. According to traditional sources, Ādi Śankarāchārya lived between 509-477 BCE. However, according to modern historians, Ādi Śankarāchārya lived between 788-820 CE. This is based on Ādi Śankarāchārya quoting Buddhist logician Dharmakīrtti verbatim. The real reason the traditional date is not acceptable to modern historians is that Ādi Śankarāchārya could not be the contemporary of Gautama Buddha. If the time of Buddha was several centuries before the currently accepted date, then the objection to the traditional date of Ādi Śankarāchārya can be worked out.
@@dityaharpatipraja4442 Atman
Atma, on the other hand, is regarded as the spirit soul of a living entity. We can consider atma as one with Brahman. Although Atma is considered to be part of the same spiritual nature as Brahman, it is an infinitesimal part of it. Moksha is thought to be possible through realizing Atman, or one’s essential self. A person’s atman is perceived as their intrinsic essence, which, as per Hindu beliefs, is separate from their ego. Atma is an aspect of your greater consciousness, like a drop of water and a wide river. Even though that drop of water has the same properties as river water, it cannot be considered the entire river. Similarly, there are numerous and diverse individual atmas. Some schools believe that Atma is eternal, while others believe that Atma eventually merges into the eternal Brahman, losing its individuality.
Buddha's characterization of "An-Aatma" ends up being the same as "Aatma", while his quest might be interesting, most of his conclusions ended up being renamed versions of already existing ideas.
Those White Hun's ( Toramaan ) Were Defeated By Yashodharman Kalchuri Son Of Prakashdharman. He is called the Adhiraj .......!!!
It's indeed Takshshila. Wow i didn't know that Mihir Kula was an atheist.
Edit:Guys I've made a video on The Muslim Caste System please check that out.
Those Muslims are obiviously local Indians only.
Mihir Kula was a Shavite.
@Aditya Kumar Pandey He believed in God of War. He was cruel but when he was defeated by Yashodharman he went to exile and followed Shavite tradition. We hindus should be proud of him that such a valiant and bloodthirsty king he was.
@@Knighted_Alexander kalhan ki likhi raajtarigini me bhi use koi Shaivite nahi bataya hsi use cruel bataya hai..
@@Knighted_Alexander but as per Buddhist texts, he was Atheist and even Brahmins disliked him.
After watching this video, I went straight to Wikipedia, surprised!!! Now the info is corrected
Mihirkula was decisively defeated by king yashovarman of magadh twice. He let him go once (indians and their non violence) and but in the 2nd battle he was killed. After that the remaining huns started to completely assimilate in indian culture.
As per our eminent historians Ramayan & mahabharat written in Gupta period, but we found c.2200 years old Heliodorus pillar ( Attribute to Lord Krishna), c.2200 old Agathocle's Vasudeva coin, we found 3000 years old rock edict of lord vishnu's 7th incarnation at inside Ayodhya Demolished Babri Masjid.
@@shaktimaan1064 but they were legends ,based on real incidents.
Hiatorians who wrote ncert?
British started translating names in Hindu religion which contrary to basic grammatical rules.
Ganga is translated as Ganges.
"It's in North-West Indi- ... Pakistan."
Mihirkula was no exception . The behaviour of the Huns against the Roman Empire was no different . Essentially , they lacked the dharmic restraints and respect for dharmic injunctions , which all the major ancient civilizations adhered to . Influence of Ram and Krishna Avatar was everywhere . Even Socrates spoke about the benevolent king , a derivative of Ram Rajya . The huns who attacked elements of Roman Empire repeatedly are very accurately presented in the documentary on Attila The Hun . (There is also a movie on Attila the hun , but documentary is very well made). The huns were never interested in administration , only in loot , rape , plunder , arson , in terrorizing. Extremely good horse riders , speed and surprise was their forte . They were physically were strong and energetic , there was one big handicap , they were loathe to face determined and prepared enemies . Which is what they encountered in India . The Kshatriya dharma , spelt out so explicitly in Bhagwat Gita by the Supreme Lord himself , forbade showing your back to any challenger . These characteristics , built into the Kshatriya DNA over generations and generations of selection , turned the tide rather early against the huns . Since the huns had no respect for dharma , it soon turned into a weeding out process . Today , the huns have Rajput gotras , which shows their is good proportion of Rajput blood in their veins . Some of them escaped into sand dunes of Thar , still show the original pure white complexion light eyes of Hepthalites. A princeling of the last king was smuggled out and nurtured secretly at a place known as Sinsini .
Buddhism and Hinduism is one and the same thing 💯
@Aditya Gole everything is Sanatan dharma
@@gituparnasarma no ,abrahamic religions are different from Vedic dharma,from every aspects.
@@kuru6212 Abhrahamic Cult*
@@kuru6212 actually you know what ? The Zoroastrians are descendants of Hindus only. Those people (who were hindus) migrated from ancient Bharat to Persia (as a result of the out of India migration) and settled there. But after some time, the culture got a little changed (food, clothing, dialect) due to the change in geography, vegetation & temperature. And with course of time, it finally evolved into what we call as Zoroastrianism.
Earlier people used to think that Sanatan Dharm is the only culture which respects and offer prays to fire (Agni). But if you look into it deeply, Zoroastrianism also has many traditional rituals that revolves around fire. So, in those places Sanatan Dharm definitely changed a little bit due to the change in climate & geography, but still there are some elements in Zoroastrianism that roots back to the Sanatani culture 🕉️
@@kuru6212 And then, the same thing goes with Judaism as well. After a few hundred years, some of the people (who followed the culture of Zoroastrianism as we call it now) migrated further to the west of Persia (present day Israel) and made their settlements there. And again due to the change in geography and environment, Zoroastrianism further evolved into what we call Judaism (Jewish culture) as of today. And we can definitely see many similarities between them.
Then finally, Christianity and Islam !! These two are direct descendants of Judaism as many people already know.
So, ultimately the phrase *Vasudhaiva* *Kutumbakam* shows the true meaning, which means "The World is One Family" !! And there should be only one way in which people are different 👉 the ones who are on the side of *Adharma* and the ones who are on the side of *Dharma* 🙏
We have 1200 universities in ancient india. Some of them were wOrld famous and center study and research.
Takshila was not a Buddhist governed university like nalanda.
It is known that there was many Hindu professors and students.
So the very theory of mihirkula destroying it because he was shivite, (which he was not) and he destroy it due hate for Buddhism is a ridiculous and laughable.
The left wing historians to normalize baktiyar khilji, the destryoer of nalanda university. 😂😂😂
This is very old tactics.
The very Aryan invasion is also result of that tactics.
Who told you that nalanda was governed only by Buddhist.
Sir, thank you for enlightening us with real history and inspiring us with your presentation of facts.
I could listen to you all day, you are a fountain of knowledge, thank you xxx
Great information in video as well as in comments
I learned something new. Thank you for enlightening us.
All Religions that believe in the concept of Reincarnation and Moksha are Dharmic "Religions" or I may say Dharma/Dharmic way of Life
Jains Buddhists and Hindus Believe in Moksha to be the priority in our cycles of life and to get rid of the Maya and Worldly Things.... And so do Sikhs..... (They call it "Mukti" Instead of Moksha)
Communists will make us think we're different and divided but in reality our core concept and belief is the same
Buddhists=Hindus=Jains=Sikhs
A University doesn't mean only building. A university is important because of books collections. When books were burnt, what would you do with ruined building
Modern historians have identified the Hunas to be the tribe of Hephthalites and/or the tribe of Xionites of central Asia close to the western parts of China. According to them, these Hunas crossed Khyber Pass and entered India during the reign of Gupta dynasty. Evidently, historians have concocted that the Hunas belonged to a foreign tribe that invaded India during the time of Gupta dynasty. But there are numerous references of Hunas in Mahabharata and Puranas which
unambiguously indicate the existence of Hunas in north-western region of India since Mahabharata era. Hunas and Hārahunas were Indian tribes of North-western region Hunas are mentioned as “Mlechchas” in Mahabharata and Purana. Mahabharata also refers to another tribe named “Hārahuna”. Sabhāparva records that Nakula subdued Hunas, Harahunas, Chinas, Sakas, Ramathas etc. in the west. Hunas and Hārahunas alongwith other western tribes were forced to pay tribute to Yudhishthira when he performed Rajasuya Yajna in Indraprastha.
रमठान हारहूणाांश च परतीच्याश चैव ये नृपााः
तान सवाान स वशे चक्रे शासनाद एव पाण्डवाः | 2.29.11
चीनान हूनाञ शकान ओडू न पवातान्तरवाससनाः
वार्ष्णेयान हारहूणाांश च कृ र्ष्णान हैमवताांस तथा | 2.47.19
पसिमासन च राज्यासन शतशाः सागरान्तन्तकान
पह्लवान दरदान सवाान सकरातान यवनाञ शकान | 3.48.20
हारहूणाांश च चीनाांश च तुखारान सैन्धवाांस तथा
जागुडान रमठान मुण्डान सत्री राज्यान अथ तङ्गणान | 3.48.21
यवनाश च स काम्बॊजा दारुणा मलेच्छ जातयाः
सक्षद् रुहाः कु न्तलाश च हूणााः पारतकै ाः सह | 6.10.64
There is no reference of Hunas or Harahunas in Ramayana. Kalidasa’s Raghuvamsa mentions that King Raghu defeated Hunas who probably reside on the banks of Sindhu river. Historians ridiculously distorted the meaning of “ससन्धुतीर” and concocted that Hunas lived in the valley of Oxus River. Mallinatha, the commentator of Raghuvamsa, clearly identifies the place in the northwestern Kashmir. Mahabharata also indirectly indicates the place of the kingdom of Hunas to be close to Uttara Jyotisha.
सवनीताध्वश्रमास्तस्य सिन्धुतीरसवचेष्टनैाः |
दुधुवुवाासजनाः स्कन्धाम्ल्लग्नकु ङ् कु मके सरान्॥ 4-67
तत्र हूणावरोधानाां भतृाषु व्यक्तसवक्रमम् |
कपोलपाटलादेसश बभूव रघुचेसष्टतम् ॥ 4-68
काम्बोजााः समरे सोढुां तस्य वीयामनीश्वरााः |
गजालानपररन्तिष्टैरक्षोटैाः साधामानतााः॥ 4-69
Hunas were dominating in the west during the lifetime of Kalidasa. It is possible that Kalidasa mistakenly speculated them to be Hunas whom King Raghu subdued. In all probability, Hunas were a clan of Kambojas because the Huna King Toramana calls himself “Shahi” in his coins. Kalidasa also indicates Hunas to be a clan of Kambojas. Since Ramayana does mention Hunas or Harahunas, it is possible that these clans of Kambojas evolved in post-Ramayana era.
Kalhana’s Rajatarangini and King Mihirakula
Kalhana gives the historical account of a Kashmir king Mihirakula. According to Kalhana, Kashmir King Mihirakula subdued many kingdoms of India including Chola, Karnata, Lata and also Simhala. Historians have wrongly identified Kashmir King Mihirakula to be a Huna King of Gupta era. First of all, Kashmir King Mihirakula reigned around 1185-1135 BCE and secondly, he was the son of Vasula of Gonanda III dynasty. Therefore, it is totally absurd to identify Kashmir King Mihirakula to be a Huna King. Moreover, Kalhana never referred to Mihirakula as a Huna king. Huna Invasion during the reign of Gupta dynasty Gupta dynasty reigned around 335-92 BCE. Western Kshatrapas were ruling in Ujjain and Gujarat during the 3rd century BCE. Chandragupta II (278-242 BCE) killed a Saka kshtrapa of Ujjain to free his elder brother Ramagupta around 279 BCE. Chandragupta II was regularly in conflict with Saka kshatrapas and finally drove them away from Ujjain and Gujarat around 246 BCE. Saka Kshatrapas of Ujjain and Hunas of north-western India had good political relations because both tribes originally belonged to north-western India. In all probability, Hunas invaded on Gupta kingdom for the first time during the reign of Kumaragupta (241-199 BCE) with an objective to recover the lost kingdom of Saka kshatrapas but Yuvaraja Skandagupta (199-177 BCE) successfully encountered the Huna invasion and forced them to retreat. The Bhitari inscription eulogizes Skandagupta and records his victory over Hunas. Though Hunas had failed in their military objective but this invasion created a deep animosity between Hunas and Guptas.
Nice knowledge bro 👌
Nice 👍
Again nonsense preached by Vedveer Arya ji. I used to be a fan of him until I saw these type of nonsense. The mention of Hunas in MB and Ramayana are later additions and interpolations the last of which were done during the Gupta period. We just cant take these texts for granted. We need to only choose the authentic material and disregard the rest. People however are easily pursuaded by such stupid rhetoric.
Some Upapurāṇas were also compiled after the Mahābhārata era. The Purāṇas available to us, it seems, were finally recompiled and updated around 500-100 BCE. This revived Puranic tradition survived till the Gupta period.
Only Bhaviṣyat Purāṇa continued to be periodically updated after the Gupta period. Purāṇas narrate the continuous genealogical and chronological history of ancient India, starting from the Mahābhārata war, and the coronation of King Yudhiṣṭhira, and ending at the Gupta period.
Unfortunately, the original Purāṇa Saṁhitās written by Romaharṣaṇa Sūta and his pupils, the earliest versions of Purāṇas, have been lost long ago. In fact, it seems even the Rāmāyaṇa and the Mahābhārata have been recompiled during the
Śātavāhana-Gupta period.
Thank you so much. I have Hun ancestry and have friends I love very much in the Punjab. Now I know we are distantly related, I just couldn't put my finger on it for a long time. 🥰
Last hun king name was Yudhishtira, Even many saka/Scythians kings name was Bhimarjuna, Arjuna, Rudrasena. It means in very ancient times they were connected with Vedic culture or their ancestor kings were well known of Arjun/Bhima, even in Mahabharat the Sakas are mentioned along Bahlikas/Bactria, kambojas/Badakshan, Tusharas/Tokharistan, China kshatriya/xingiang part people , Daradas/Dardic , Yavana/greeks but in mahabharat vedvyas ji designated them as mlecchas. There must be a cultural connection between hunas and Sakas with vedic period. If turks had connections with Vedic cutures then they wont destroyed Afg or various temples or they wont do forced conversion.
In Mahabharata and ramayan and Vedas we used to mention as Jeembudweep(big Island), Bharatvarsh(bigger than Akhand Bharat) and Bharata Khand (more bigger than present Bharat)
@@saisumanthdss1919 correct
Because the Huns were Sanskrit speaking people.
@@lautheimpaler4686 no, they were used to speak and write in Bramhi and Bactrian. Yes these 2 languages have similarities with Sanskrit but no doubt they were lost vedic tribes. Not all ancient Vedic tribes used to speak vedic sanskrit example: pandya, Andhra, Chera, Chola they are Descendant of King Turvashu the brother of Yadu& Puru ( Lunar Dynasty kings), these tribes did not speak sanskrit but they followed vedic customs.
Turks were not vedic people. Turks and Huns were entirely new people who later on assimilated with Indian tribes (or supposed 'Iranian' tribes) living far away around the region of Afghanistan and Central Asia region. Some Turks and Huns had to adopt local Indian culture otherwise people won't accept them as rulers that's why they later assimilated into our society and has Indian sounding names. This would have happened to entire Turkic tribes, had they invaded assuming there was no Islam. Khaljis are another example. They were mixture of Turks and afghans and they were Indianized until the arrival of Islam.
most huns were defeated by yashodharman
#AskAbhijit We know ancient India had so many great universities, so much wealth, such great thinkers, great technology etc etc etc. With so much of resources why couldn't we defend ourselves from multiple foreign invasions?? Why couldn't we build defensive capabilities against those foreign invaders??
You are wrong mate we are the only surviving oldest pagan culture in the world it's because of our great Kings and forefathers don't believe in these modern a$$ licking brown coolie Indian historians who supports leftist western historians to become famous.
States have always struggled against the nomads. India is unfortunately in a location where it is at the doorstep of the central Asian nomads. The most rough and impressive fighters in human history. In addition, nomads never had any state structures and all people could fight: women, children, men. In states, jobs were separate between farmers, soldiers, bankers, etc...
Even though state warriors had better weapons, nomads had nothing to lose and so their large hordes would wait for instability in the states and attack whenever a state showed weakness. That is nomads won.
Also Indian warfare was ritualistic and had code of ethics, outsider (mlechas) had no code of ethics to regulate warfare. A good example is Prithviraj Chauhan who saw a retreating Muhhamad of Ghor and thought that he had won the war, since in Indian warfare codes, retreating meant that you had conceded defeat. In reality, Muhhamad was only regrouping for a massive counterattack...
Unity, people unite in fear for survival, to protect their identity and life, second reason is peace, people become weak and divide themselves in group during time of peace, prithviraj chavhan killed by his own people, who grouped together against him, chavhan Kingdom was there for more than 400 years, even after loss of Delhi, ranthambore was there, they were big rulers
I wanna say only one thing,
Your question is good example of how u r victim of our great distorted history --:
I m not saying u r bad but also i was also same kind of victim with such nonsensical questions in my mind before I reached yt.
Peace:-)
Takshashila is the name. Taxila is the colonial mindset. Mumbai is the name, Bombay is the brown coolie mindset.
turth is we are dharmic people.. ( either sikh, jain, budh, hindu(opposed by others), etc..) we all are one.. child of our bharat mata
Buddhists have their roots in Hinduism. But Dharma isn’t a ism which is monotheistic concept. For us Buddhist Jambhuvipa or Arya bumi is the holy land of India.
yeah he also mentions this ism thing in many of his videos
Yes, Wikipedia did mention him as follower of Shaiva Sect who destroyed Buddhist Shrines. It's also mentioned that Chinese pilgrims noticed that he was an atheist and barbaric and even the Brahmins consider him a Mlechh.
Thanks Mr Chavda for your dedication and devotion carrying out your research and finally sharing your findings.
I am very inspired by you and Want you to become my Guru (maarg darshak) 😇🙏
Apologies Sir it's not among the world's oldest university but its world's first university. It existed before Nalanda University also. Around 500 BC
Sir how pyramids were made ?
It's just so fascinating..
I would love if u'll put some light over it 🙂
Sorry, can the reason for the destruction also be because during Alexander's invasion many gurus stood against him and so the destroyer of Takshashila also understood that and as strategy destroyed it so that no intellectual counter can come up against it.
Very good insights Abhijit ji
Know first time Taxila destroyed by Huns !
Thanks 🙏
Takshashila rules!! Thank you for your video sir!!
It is TAKSHASHEELA VISHWAVIDYALAY, 'Taxilla' is an Anglicized mispronunciation ,and doesn't make any sense.
Informative video as always
In the quest for Parabrahm and Moksha (to enlighten oneself and attain nirvan) our population became highly selfcentred and introverted.
I & ME were important then the society and country hence our kings never looked outwards and were always defensive and not offensive.
This is the primary reason why very few kings crossed the borders and attacked enemy/foreign land.
That's why it's said over religious is harmful.
"Once again, I am gonna get nice comments down there, Don't care"
--Super Sigma
You have the good art of debunking.
Most appropriate topic.
Huns also destroyed Nalandha and was later restored by Skandagupta. I may be wrong but this is was that I learnt somewhere
Abhijit: I would like know about Huns, not only the ones invaded and assimilated in India, also the branch led by Aattilla who taught Europeans few lesson.
I'm confused please clear this , in ancient India the warriors like in Mahabharata or Ramayan period there average height is above 6.5 or even 7feet I hear it from many peoples so I asked 🙏.
1:04 🥶🥶
Sir plz make video on mahapadmananda
Taxi la 😂😂
Great knowledge ❤
Sir can you please give some information about samrat samprati (grandson of samrat ashok) and I heard a rumor that he was one of the reason that Chinese kings built great wall of china and many more than you.
Least we expect from Abhijit is that he pronounce words correctly, तोरमाण and मिहिरकुल.
Sir, please share what you know about CIA and IB's collaboration on Nanda Devi nuclear device which caused chamoli flood and is a threat to massive amount of Indian citizens.
Mihirakula was a Shivite I hear.. it was mihirakula who destroyed Taxila because the Buddhist could not answer to his Satisfaction. Reference to him being an Atheist have no indic sources. Why is his tribe can Hun? Who named them the Huns?
There is an Engineering University in Taxila aka Takshashila. It's called UET Taxila. Taxila is approximately 30 km away from Islamabad at the border of Punjab and KPK province of Pakistan
#AskAbhijit
Sir, what according to you should be the best way to mark time apart from the BC/AD and BCE/CE? Don't you think this is slightly or gravely giving a false perception of time and the events that took place during such time?
We already have the Vikram Samvat and the Saka Calendar.
@@GuhaKashyap oh thank you very much Sir, Wasn't aware of its existence.will gather info on it now 👍🏻
#AskAbhijit
sir I watched whole seties of prateek mohan on angkor wat and he said that it was first a hindu temple but then Buddhist people destroyed it and converted it into buddhist temple.
Please tell us about it.
Takshashila University existed even during Mahabharat times but sri krishna and sri balram went to ujjaini to study where they met sudama . this could mean it had not achieved great eminence .panini had taught there prior to chanakya during which time it had grown to be the elite gurukul .
#AskAbhijit Sir today I read in a Bengali newspaper that the women skeleton discovered in rakhigari has steppe ancestry. What is your opinion on this.
Newspaper isn't any source of authority to validate anything
@@descendantofbharatbharatva7155 If that is the case then it's a serious problem cause many youth will going to believe it
I don't know about newspapers but the dna was not R1a1 and people from both left and right Wing interpret or I should say overinterpret in the way that they want to
Sir Can you share more lIght on the topic Builderberg Group..
#ASKABHIJIT Can you please talk about the geopolitical angle of Vikram Lander failure? Watched your latest podcast and I am really curious to know more on this
#AskAbhijit are there any great engineering marvels in South India built after the 14th century when Islamic invasions occured, until the domination of British Raj?
The chineses never wrote anything kind about Xiongnu or Huns in any frame of time. The rumans also never wrote anything kind about Huns. And even today in brussells in the EU there is the Hungarophobia. Abhijit Sir i wish you much and your people much good and wealth.
Huna Kings Toramana (190-160 BCE) and Mihirakula (160-130 BCE). After the death of Skandagupta around 177 BCE, the Huna king Toramana took the advantage of
the falling Gupta empire and invaded up to central India. Aulikara dynasty of central India became the ally of Hunas and uprooted the rule of Vakatakas, the allies of Guptas. The Rishthal stone inscription of Aulikara king Prakashadharma dated in Malava Samvat 572 (147 BCE) eulogizes the Huna king Toramana and calls him “Hunadhipa”.
“A - Toramana - nrpa - mauli - ratna - jyotsna - pratana - sabalikrta - pada - pitham I Hunadhipasya
bhuvi yena gatah pratishtham nito yudha vitathatarn - Adhiraja - sabdah II”
The Sanjeli copper plate of Maharaja Bhuta tells us that King Bhuta was the feudatory of Maharajadhiraja Toramana in the vishaya of Shivabhagapura. A coin of Huna king Toramana has the legends “Maharajadhiraja” and “Shahi”.
Aulikara king Yashodharama, the son of Prakashadharma, mentions Huna king Mihirakula in his Mandasor Pillar inscription dated in Malava Samvat 589 (130 BCE). There is an inscription of Mihirakula in Gwalior dated in the 15th regnal year which informs us that Mihirakula constructed
a Surya temple. This inscription also refers to Huna king Toramana. Hiuen Tsang and King Mihirakula Hiuen Tsang records that centuries ago, Mihirakula established his authority and ruled over India. He also mentions that king Baladitya defeated Mihirakula and captured him. King Baladitya’s mother advised his son to release Mihirakula. When Mihirakula returned to his kingdom, he found that his brother had already ascended the throne.
As I have explained in my article “The Missing ~660 years in the Chronology of the World History” that there is a chronological error of ~660 years in the history of India. Accordingly, the lifetime of Hiuen Tsang must be fixed around 58 BCE-4CE and he sojourned in India around 30-15 BCE.
Historians have speculated that Hiuen Tsang refers to Huna king Mihirakula. But Hiuen Tsang clearly refers to King Mihirakula who lived many centuries ago from his lifetime. Huna King Mihirakula flourished hardly 100 years before Hiuen Tsang. Evidently, Hiuen Tsang mentions Kashmir king Mihirakula and not Huna king. Moreover, Hiuen Tsang mentions that Shākala wasthe capital of Mihirakula. Greek sources clearly record that Alexander destroyed the city of Shākala. Therefore, Mihirakula of Hieun Tsang must have lived before Alexander. A passage from
the works of Hiuen Tsang: Historians have also mistakenly identified King Baladitya, a contemporary of Mihirakula, with Gupta king Narasimhagupta Baladitya. In fact, Baladitya was a Naga king of 12th century BCE who defeated Kashmir King Mihirakula. According to Tibetan sources, Buddhist philosopher Nagarjuna was the junior contemporary of Harichandra who founded the rule of Naga dynasty in Sonabhadra. Sadvahana was the son of Harichandra. Most probably, either Harichandra or Sadvahana had a title of Baladitya because Chandragupta and Chandraprakasha, the later descendants of Naga dynasty had titles “Vikramaditya” and “Baladitya” respectively. Paramatha’s “Life of Vasubandhu” tells us that Buddhist Philosopher Vasubandhu of 10th century BCE was the contemporary of Vikramaditya and Baladitya.
In view of the above, it is evident that Hiuen Tsang refers to Kashmir king Mihirakula and Naga king Baladitya. White Hunas and non-White Hunas Ancient western historians referred to Hunas and white hunas. Byzantine historians called white
hunas as Ephthalites whereas Persian historians referred to them as Hephthalites. Chinese historians called Hunas as Hiung nu and white hunans as “Ye-tai” or Hua. Evidently, there were two groups of Hunas, whites and non-whites (Black hunas). According to Western historical sources, a Huna King Attila (non-white) invaded Roman empire. He crossed Danube river and invaded Balkans around 80-90 CE but he could not capture Constantinople. It appears thatwestern historians mistakenly called Attila as non-white Huna because he was not Hephthalite. Most probably, Attila belonged to a tribe of central Asia and he did not belong to Indian tribe Hunas.
Interestingly, there is no reference of White Hunas in entire Indian literature. Historians have concocted that Varahamihira refers to White Hunas as “Shveta-Huna” and “Sita-Huna”. In fact, Varahamihira refers to a different tribe named “Shveta or Sita” meaning whites.
Bhattotpala, a commentator of Brihat Samhita, unambiguously explains that Shveta and Huna were two different tribes. Evidently, there was a white tribe named “Shveta” existed in northern Afghanistan and they were not Hunas. In all probability, the word “Shveta” became “Hephtha”
in Persian dialect. Thus, the words “Hephthalites” or “Ephthalites” evolved from Sanskrit word “Shveta”. There is no reference of Shveta or Sita tribe in Mahabharata. Probably, the Kalash people of Chitral area of Pakistan may belong to this ancient Shveta tribe. There is a need of furtherresearch to find out whether Shvetas were an indigenous tribe or a migrated tribe of northern
Afghanistan.
Huns (kutrigurs utigurs)are Scythian origin massagetae, saka???
Takshashila was destroyed by Hindu kings at the time of shunga and Gupta dynasty by the command of Brahmins at that time...
#AskAbhijit Is it possible for the dark energy to run out eventually? And if it was to happen the universe should start contracting but where would the energy go afterall our universe is a closed system, i mean by that is the energy which was used in expanding in the universe must go somewhere if the universe starts contracting because of law of conservation of energy, would it create dark energy again and thus create a physical equilibrium and maintain the size of universe for indefinite time.
#AskAbhijit Sir, the current government is very vocal about retaking POK, and our defense minister also mentioned it in a speech on Kargil Vijay Diwas. Do you think India is preparing for war with pakistan, if so then is this the best time to wage a war with pakistan?
gandhara is an ancient kingdom in northern pakistan comprising of northern punjab (potohar plateaus) and kpk and gilgit
we have our own NON BHARATIYA HISTORY and we were never part of HINDOO INDIAN CIVILIZATUON
Is Lord Gautam Buddh is 9th Avatar of Lord Vishnu and then Kalki is 10th ? Plzz answer
No 9th avatar is controversial. ......In Jagannath temple lord Jagannath is 9tv avatra, in some south temple mohini was 9th avatar and but for budha there is a different budha whoes father mother and birth place are different from goutam budha as 9th avatar.
Sir....
Both Taxila or Takshshila is same.
Takshshila sounds elite.
Taxila sounds comedic.
#AskAbhijit
Sir can you plz tell exactly how do you find original (unedited) writings of people (like gandhi Sarojini naidu etc). Online
Or how to find reliable untampered orignal historical texts etc
Sir which book would you prefer to start reading Indian history?
Great information 👍
#AskAbhijit Sir the answer to this question is supposed to be known by many but i have no idea how is the timeline of years divided Like AD,CE,BC and who came up with this idea and what was the thought process behind that
Mihirkula was belived to be ardent devotee of lord shiva
AND IT IS TIME FOR ALL THE INDO-ARIAN LANGUAGES SPEAKING NATIONS/COUNTRIES UNITE AND RESTORE THE SANCRIT/AVESTO LANGUAGE AS THE COMMON LANGUAGE FOR ALL THE INDO-ARIAN LANGUAGES SPEAKING NATIONS/COUNTRIES.
IT IS TIME TO CREATE "THE UNION OF INDO-ARIAN LANGUAGES NATIONS/COUNTRIES"
EU HAS IT IS OWN UNION, WE SHOULD CREATE OUR UNION AS WELL.
#AskAbhijit
Do Indians (Hindus) have a disadvantage vis-à-vis the archaeological method, as they cremate their dead?
#Askabhijit Hi Sir.. can you please put some light on why Armenia and Azerbaijan war is not covered by west or world like Russia war on Ukraine.
Hunic means HUNZA? Please mention from where the huns came from.
#askabijith sir, my mind blown away when i read about shunga's persecution of buddhists. Can u spot some light on this topic.
Tora mann destroyed, razed varanasi and mathura as well mlecchas couldn't never be part of fold and never will
Informative
These Huns ruled over the NW corner of India, not India in whole. Maybe this could be clarified.
any suggestion on books regarding wallachian history
Taxila is indeed propagated in our history books as anglicised version of Takshashila!
Abhijit, While it may be true that huns were atheist or shamanism, Let's not forget that rajatarangini of kashmir praises him as great kashmiri ruler. Due to this mordern scholars call him great shaivite or patron Kashmir shaivism.
Kab praise kiya kalhan ne use?? Kalhan ne use bahut bura kaha hai matlab kuch bhi??
@@anahita934 Read again what i said. Rajatarangini Praises Huns as great rulers of Kashmir not Abhijit.
@@pooper2831 kalhan ne mihirkul hun ki baat ki hai na ki hun dynasty ki aur kalhan ne mihirkul ke bare me likha hai ki wo bahut bura tha aur mai ab zyada uske bare me nahi likhna chahta ki wo kitna bura tha par haan usne use shiva ko maanane wala kaha tha par Xuanzang ne uske liye aisa kuch nahi kaha ki wo shiva ka upasak tha.. Xuanzang ne likha hai ki usne boddho ko mara par sath me ye nahi likha ki wo Shaivite tha..
@@anahita934 you are right...I was mistaken.thanks for correcting me.
#AskAbijith
Sir, can you recommend some books to truly understand the modern history of INDIA?
mihirkula was defeated by yashodharman who led an alliance of Indian kings and landed a decive and final defeat to mihirkula 😃😃😃
Huns are not monolithic. Kidarites, Alcon Hun and Hepthalites. All different and fighting for space. All of them were displaced from Central Asia and fought to find a new home. So this podcast does not capture the nature of Huns who invaded over a period of time nor delves on their differences.
The White Huns (svetahuna), in incredibly barbaric nation born from a mix between mongolians and white Tokharians, imitated the Kushanas, excepted that they hated Buddhism. This religion had then been encouraged for centuries, starting with the Greek-Bactrian Kingdom....
Why ? They wanted soft Indians who spend their time meditating.
The Hephtalites were massacred by similar people : the Turks.
Jai Shri Ram
This is my city now in taxila
#askabhijit
Samrat vikramaditya vs julius caesar
#AskAbhijit
Could please throw some light on the French diplomat Charles Maurice de Talleyrand
Thats an uppercut
Babu Bhaiya to Britishers: Tu v totla, Mai v totla.. Totla Totla Bhaii Bhaii
Taxila...what's Taxila..that tone😁
Brief about white hun and why rajput what link ? Huns is rajput?
I loved when he said MAINLAND INDIA