He is great, but it isn’t like he is talking about some stupid topic, our history (English history) is incredible especially to the English people, and he’s also talking about one of its greatest kings and one of the greatest periods of time that helped set the stage for in my opinion the most interesting period in our history the wars of the Roses
Dan Jones only made a couple quick visits to the USA to promote this book. For that, I hated missing him in St. Louis in OCT 2024. Hope to meet him soon. Wonderful historian. Tells the histories with such passion and energy. I’m on listen #4 of Henry V.
@stephenconnolly3018 Sorry! I actually admire yoy both! But time zones mean I am always watching you frankly exceptional analysis after a hard day's work and with a quiet drama of single malt!
Excellent point about the possibility /probability that Henry V was not scarred by the arrow injury at Shrewsbury. That has been my reading of the events of 1403 for a considerable time, and very good to hear Dan Jones make just the same arguments! I look forward to reading the book.
Looking forward to reading V this weekend. I wish Dan would have started with Bolingbroke first. Ian Mortiner did a great job but thers hardly any books coveriny the IV Henry
Jones points out that Henry was "lucky", in that Henry died in his prime. Richard had a sort of downward spiral after the Third Crusade. Also, being a great general/warrior isn't EVERYTHING. I say that as a HUGE Lionheart fan.
Yes he was , his kids liked him , he had little or no civil unrest from his nobles or even the plebs lol during a 50 year reign, he was a great leader in every way .
Interesting to notice how true leaders shone during the 100-year war: Edward III and Henry V on the English side / Charles V and Charles VII on the French side, the latter being able to win it.
Long bows... Isnt the talk that it wasnt a "french draw" but they actually stepped into the bow.. So anchor, straight arm, step. Theyve done osteo tendon attachment analysis on archers and found load evidence on muscle groups that support this. So dynamic v load etc.
It's no coincidence,that the shakespeare plays that bigs up the kings are direct links to the Tudor claim The plays that demonise the king ,are directly against the legitimatesy of the Tudor line
Kate, this is an interview. DAN is supposed to tell us the history. If you want the spotlight…….do your own thing. Don’t pretend to interview someone then have to jump on to show off how much you know. So annoying when the interviewer can’t shut up and let the person being interviewed speak
I think for the purpose of objective historical analysis we should not equate authorizing a translation of the Bible with “rewriting it”. Further, because the incendiary footnotes of the Geneva Bible could not possibly have been part of the original Holy writings, removing those , would not necessarily be changing religion to suit rulership.
Henry 5 was the King who lost all but about 7 square miles of the English possessions in France plus he died in that losing campaign. And left a baby son to b come king. Who was crowned at 6 months old. The English historians glorify 3 battles Henry 5 won. But he lost the war Nothing great about 1. Losing a war. 2 Losing the vast English possessions in France Henry’s losing the war led to vast economic problems in England. All those destitute unpaid soldiers coming home. Plus all the English settlers in the former English territories in France. This is just English chauvinism forget we lost the Hundred Years’ War. But we win 3 battles
Well, to be fair, he won Agincourt, had trouble taking Normandy (the siege of Rouen, Domfront were awful), his brother lost a battle and life against a French and Scottish army, was greatly helped by the conflict with Burgundy, made and end to the _Great Schism_ , was recognised by the _Treaty of Troyes_ as heir and regent of France. He could have become one of the most important figures in Europe, but illness and the Dauphin's resilience got the better of him.
Somewhere the Lionheart is turning in his grave. Henry was a great soldier king, but warrior? He was a good warrior, but Richard l was a great warrior.
Richard coeur de lion would not be turning in his grave!!! Simply because he couldn't give 2 nobs of butter about the English he just used them to fund his pointless wars in the middle east. He was French through and through didn't speak English spent all of about 6months of his time as king on these shores, rest of time spent crusading or in france. Not even a great warrior as got himself killed for no reason other than to boast his ego by trying to take a non-strategic castle. Yeah a great warrior King of England 😂
Never watched it the introduction was enough to put me off if l was diabetic l would .need insulin Is she a real academic , or just a ... fill in your own words ! Svuch a pity it could have been interesting
She is a professor in history at the University of Reading in addition to an author and TV presenter. Do you have any qualifications other than being a total Richard Cranium?
Random man on the internet named Bob feels like he has the right to question the credentials of a woman that’s far better educated than he will ever be. Lmao sit down Bob.
I realise that different generations dress differently, but a grim coloured T shirt and tattoos is poor to say the least, just not good enough irrespective of who you are, what you do, and your intelligence.
@@Paeoniarosa most men wear trousers, but there are trousers and trousers, most men have their hair cut, but there are hair cuts and hair cuts, many men have taste, the clothes here do not represent good taste.
Richard I was English ? How much time did he devote to his motherland ? King he may have been but everything he did he did for himself. He would have sold London if he could have found a buyer I believe he once said.
I just love Dan Jones. I'm from Bolivia but I'm obsessed with English history. Thanks Dan and congrat.
Thats cool. Made me want to research some bolivian history in return
Thanks Dan, you are the best. Who knows!, maybe someday.
🙂
Greatest country in the world without doubt
Dan is amazing & I could listen to him for hours. Love his books & the fantastic podcast A Dynasty To Die For.
Love Dan. Proof that a well thought out, well articulated speaker can make anything interesting.
Yes he has lovely joints
The subject matter is interesting. Dan is wonderful, I agree. But I find it astounding that people can manage to make this stuff boring.
He is great, but it isn’t like he is talking about some stupid topic, our history (English history) is incredible especially to the English people, and he’s also talking about one of its greatest kings and one of the greatest periods of time that helped set the stage for in my opinion the most interesting period in our history the wars of the Roses
@MissMarie1377 What was boring? Or was the topic just over your head?
Dan Jones only made a couple quick visits to the USA to promote this book. For that, I hated missing him in St. Louis in OCT 2024. Hope to meet him soon. Wonderful historian. Tells the histories with such passion and energy. I’m on listen #4 of Henry V.
Awesome interview. Part two, please.
Dan Jones is The Greatest! His Book Henry V is Magnificent.
Dan Brown is simply an exceptional historian.
Jones. I think you meant? But it's nice to know I'm not the only one that makes silly mistakes.
@stephenconnolly3018 Sorry! I actually admire yoy both! But time zones mean I am always watching you frankly exceptional analysis after a hard day's work and with a quiet drama of single malt!
Excellent point about the possibility /probability that Henry V was not scarred by the arrow injury at Shrewsbury. That has been my reading of the events of 1403 for a considerable time, and very good to hear Dan Jones make just the same arguments! I look forward to reading the book.
Henry died of dysentery horrible diarrhea
I love everything about Dan Jones🎉
I just finished The Plantagenets and now I'm on to Henry V. Love Dan's books!
Dr. Bradmore was a genius. The account of how he saved the prince is amazing.
He really was there’s another video on history hit where they really go into it and what he gave him medicines everything
Wow I am really astonished by this stuff. Thanks for sharing this! Please keep them coming:)
that was unreal where’s part 2 👍🏻🔥💯💪🏻
The book is amazing. Can’t put it down.
Henry was brave and a motivator
Looking forward to reading V this weekend. I wish Dan would have started with Bolingbroke first. Ian Mortiner did a great job but thers hardly any books coveriny the IV Henry
bruh… i need the rest of this?!
Where I can I find part 2? Thanks
Absolute insult to Richard the Lionheart. There was no greater warrior king of England than him. His generalship and courage were unparalleled.
Jones points out that Henry was "lucky", in that Henry died in his prime. Richard had a sort of downward spiral after the Third Crusade. Also, being a great general/warrior isn't EVERYTHING. I say that as a HUGE Lionheart fan.
Englands Greatest Warrior King, Edward III.
Maybe he’ll write a book about Edward III someday.
Yes he was , his kids liked him , he had little or no civil unrest from his nobles or even the plebs lol during a 50 year reign, he was a great leader in every way .
Is it any wonder that Henry V would be a powerful warrior when you look at both his father and grandfather.
And he is HOT, HOT, HOT!!! 😅
Yep. Hot and smart.
I’m here doing important research. For science. I swear.
Richard the Lion heart would be england's greatest warrior king. His whole life was a battle.
7:00
17:00
18:53 letter
28:00
What watch is he wearing
Note also that Azincourt is spelled with a Z. English people turned it to Agincourt with a G because Henry V was supposed to speak through his nose.
Interesting to notice how true leaders shone during the 100-year war: Edward III and Henry V on the English side / Charles V and Charles VII on the French side, the latter being able to win it.
Kate Williams looks exactly how I imagine Elizabeth I
How arrogant does one man have to behave to be called out.
Long bows... Isnt the talk that it wasnt a "french draw" but they actually stepped into the bow.. So anchor, straight arm, step. Theyve done osteo tendon attachment analysis on archers and found load evidence on muscle groups that support this. So dynamic v load etc.
I think I bought a dime bag off this guy once
Moe Howard of the three stooges pulled off that haircut too...
Did he though? 😁
Edward III is the true warrior king of England
Percy's my cousins 😮
It's no coincidence,that the shakespeare plays that bigs up the kings are direct links to the Tudor claim
The plays that demonise the king ,are directly against the legitimatesy of the Tudor line
Fan of British history and historians. Lived out in the streets. Not a fan of tattoo sleeves. History is going to frown upon them.
Shakespeare is mine -owner of original manuscripts
I disagree with the thumbnail. Henry II was a greater warrior king than Henry V.
She talks Yoo Much! We are hear him!
Yes, most of those words are English.
She, in her own right, is quite well known! It is an honor to have them both on stage!
I agree. If she needs the spotlight gave her do her own thing. She is a terrible interviewer because she has to show off.
It’s annoying
@@MissMarie1377Maybe they'll ask you next time.
Still have the notes, but don't know which side of the face??
Very odd!
He says in the notes left side but the way he wrote it is ambiguous as to the prince’s left side or his left (Bradmore’s)
And because the portrait profile is left side it has people confused
Kate, this is an interview. DAN is supposed to tell us the history. If you want the spotlight…….do your own thing. Don’t pretend to interview someone then have to jump on to show off how much you know.
So annoying when the interviewer can’t shut up and let the person being interviewed speak
@@MissMarie1377 She is the host and the interviewer. That's her job. Envious much?
Personally I think Richard the Lionheart is the best warrior king because he was a legit warrior who did insane mad lad stuff
I think for the purpose of objective historical analysis we should not equate authorizing a translation of the Bible with “rewriting it”. Further, because the incendiary footnotes of the Geneva Bible could not possibly have been part of the original Holy writings, removing those , would not necessarily be changing religion to suit rulership.
Got to disagree and say Edward 3 was the greatest English warrior king
Henry the V , achieved the impossible for nothing.
Whoa. Slow down. I dare any English King to outdo the Lion hearted did at Asruf
He said they know the time of his birth because of Astrology..FFS
I’m sorry, the book sounds great but Dan Jones just always hits me off as a “look at me” self-promoter Can only take him for like 7 minutes
I think he's great!
I think he's brilliant. I have a master's degree in history and I would love to be half as intelligent. So feel feel free to jog on.
@@BritGirl-fg9gj of course he’s brilliant - just ask him
Because he’s attractive? Get over it. It’s so annoying that some people get a stick in their freakin craw over someone because they’re good looking.
@@thequintanashow5058 Shame you aren't.
Henry 5 was the King who lost all but about 7 square miles of the English possessions in France plus he died in that losing campaign. And left a baby son to b come king. Who was crowned at 6 months old.
The English historians glorify 3 battles Henry 5 won. But he lost the war Nothing great about 1. Losing a war. 2 Losing the vast English possessions in France Henry’s losing the war led to vast economic problems in England. All those destitute unpaid soldiers coming home. Plus all the English settlers in the former English territories in France. This is just English chauvinism forget we lost the Hundred Years’ War. But we win 3 battles
Did you just watch the podcast with those two old guys saying Henry V was a crap King??
Well, to be fair, he won Agincourt, had trouble taking Normandy (the siege of Rouen, Domfront were awful), his brother lost a battle and life against a French and Scottish army, was greatly helped by the conflict with Burgundy, made and end to the _Great Schism_ , was recognised by the _Treaty of Troyes_ as heir and regent of France. He could have become one of the most important figures in Europe, but illness and the Dauphin's resilience got the better of him.
Somewhere the Lionheart is turning in his grave. Henry was a great soldier king, but warrior? He was a good warrior, but Richard l was a great warrior.
Amen!
Richard coeur de lion would not be turning in his grave!!! Simply because he couldn't give 2 nobs of butter about the English he just used them to fund his pointless wars in the middle east. He was French through and through didn't speak English spent all of about 6months of his time as king on these shores, rest of time spent crusading or in france. Not even a great warrior as got himself killed for no reason other than to boast his ego by trying to take a non-strategic castle. Yeah a great warrior King of England 😂
First rate.
Never watched it the introduction was enough to put me off if l was diabetic l would .need insulin Is she a real academic , or just a ... fill in your own words ! Svuch a pity it could have been interesting
She is a professor in history at the University of Reading in addition to an author and TV presenter. Do you have any qualifications other than being a total Richard Cranium?
Random man on the internet named Bob feels like he has the right to question the credentials of a woman that’s far better educated than he will ever be. Lmao sit down Bob.
@@Tsumami__ Well said 👏🏻👏🏻
I realise that different generations dress differently, but a grim coloured T shirt and tattoos is poor to say the least, just not good enough irrespective of who you are, what you do, and your intelligence.
I believe at one time the BBC was introducing a number of younger charismatic historians, and now a lot of them are associated with History Hit.
@@Paeoniarosa There inability to dress correctly does not produce charisma. Dan Snow is bright and well presented.
@@davidgray3321 Dan Snow wears t-shirts and jeans, but ok.
@@Paeoniarosa most men wear trousers, but there are trousers and trousers, most men have their hair cut, but there are hair cuts and hair cuts, many men have taste, the clothes here do not represent good taste.
I don’t care how he’s dressed. He writes and speaks well. I really enjoyed Powers and Thrones, and I look forward to reading this one, too.
Englands greatest warrior king, um excuse me ‘Richard the Lionheart’
He was an absentee King. Good military leader - bad King.
Henry V did both well.
@@WLDBnot just absent but cost the country a lot of money. Firstly for the wars then when he was ransomed.
Not exactly a check in the great column.
Richard I was English ? How much time did he devote to his motherland ? King he may have been but everything he did he did for himself. He would have sold London if he could have found a buyer I believe he once said.
Did the Lionheart speak any English?
@@Paeoniarosa French as did most of the Plantagenet kings until Henry IV. Who still spoke French but made an effort to conform to the native tongue.