Why Use The ESV When We Have The NKJV?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 118

  • @kaltech04
    @kaltech04 2 місяці тому +6

    My church uses the ESV but I prefer the NKJV.. For one thing, they read very similarly to one another already, so I don’t feel like I’m really gaining any extra incite by reading the same passage in both versions. Secondly, I prefer the textual notes that the NKJV offers. I like having the TR, critical test, and majority text at my fingertips and the NKJV provides that.

    • @reformedpilgrim
      @reformedpilgrim 2 місяці тому +1

      If your NKJV is from Thomas Nelson, then I totally get it. They do a great job pointing out textual variations in the footnotes. They don’t tell you which variant you have to accept; they’re just informing the reader. They’re the best of the Bible publishers that I’ve seen.

    • @frostLeather
      @frostLeather  2 місяці тому +1

      Nkjv Bibles really do have great references to the variations of the texts, why I really love the classic large print ultrathins.

    • @bartbannister394
      @bartbannister394 2 місяці тому

      I love the ESV, it works better than anything I ever used. That includes Charmin, Scotts Tissue and the NKJV. It tends to clog up the plumbing once and awhile, but I am relaxed, clean and chaff free. Praise Jesus!

  • @reformedpilgrim
    @reformedpilgrim 2 місяці тому +4

    Both the ESV and the NKJV are my favorites, with a slight advantage going to the NKJV. But, I will continue to use both for the foreseeable future, Lord willing.

    • @frostLeather
      @frostLeather  2 місяці тому

      I think the NKJV wins because of its stability, while the ESV is still in flux.

    • @bartbannister394
      @bartbannister394 2 місяці тому

      I love the ESV, it works better than anything I ever used. That includes Charmin, Scotts Tissue and the NKJV. It tends to clog up the plumbing once and awhile, but I am relaxed, clean and chaff free. Praise Jesus!

    • @thescarletandgrey2505
      @thescarletandgrey2505 Місяць тому

      @@bartbannister394I sincerely hope you aren’t equating the Word of God to something you would wipe your anal area with.

  • @2woofs784
    @2woofs784 2 місяці тому

    That's the same combination I use. The NKJV and NLT. Thanks for all your videos. Prayers Flying for ya

  • @zackrippy4445
    @zackrippy4445 2 місяці тому +4

    I love the NKJV. Though I am AG, every school I went to was KJV only and I have the upmost respect and admiration for that one. My mom uses the NKJV (you rebound a lovely one for her earlier this year) and I keep coming back to that translation. This year, I’ve done all my reading and personal devotion in the NLT for the first time and loved it. But for study, I plan to go back to the NKJV after several years of trying to fall for the ESV. It just hasn’t stuck with me. I’d also recommend the MEV to you. As you know, you recently rebound an MEV Fire Bible for me. I’ve only read it a bit so far, but I plan to read through it in its entirety soon. Take care, my friend and God bless!

    • @bartbannister394
      @bartbannister394 2 місяці тому +1

      I love the ESV, it works better than anything I ever used. That includes Charmin, Scotts Tissue and the NKJV. It tends to clog up the plumbing once and awhile, but I am relaxed, clean and chaff free. Praise Jesus!

    • @garytakvorian6204
      @garytakvorian6204 2 місяці тому +1

      You're on dangerous ground using the Lord's name in vain. You also are not showing the kind of tolerance you likely demand of others. Mockery is demonic. You will one day find they are friends like Judas was to Christ. The Lord have mercy on you.

    • @bartbannister394
      @bartbannister394 2 місяці тому

      @@garytakvorian6204 Yahweh sucks farts out of pigeons.

    • @bartbannister394
      @bartbannister394 2 місяці тому

      @@garytakvorian6204 Do you suck farts out of pigeons, like Jesus does?

    • @bartbannister394
      @bartbannister394 2 місяці тому

      @@garytakvorian6204 Do you suck farts out of pigeons, like Jesus does?

  • @jonathanrector
    @jonathanrector 4 дні тому

    Do you find that generally speaking, you read the NKJV or the NLT for daily devotional reading, and not study? Thanks man.

  • @SimplyProtestantBibleBeliever
    @SimplyProtestantBibleBeliever 17 днів тому

    Profound thoughts on the NKJV brother!

  • @sdhute
    @sdhute 2 місяці тому +2

    Mainly NASB/NKJV and sometimes KJV. My churches uses the NKJV and I was surprised how close my NASB reads to it. Where my ESV was completely different. Since the ESV keeps revising itself I no longer read it.

    • @frostLeather
      @frostLeather  2 місяці тому +1

      I agree! both the nasb and esv keep making updates, why I prefer the NKJV, we can count on it!

    • @bartbannister394
      @bartbannister394 2 місяці тому

      I love the ESV, it works better than anything I ever used. That includes Charmin, Scotts Tissue and the NKJV. It tends to clog up the plumbing once and awhile, but I am relaxed, clean and chaff free. Praise Jesus!

    • @thescarletandgrey2505
      @thescarletandgrey2505 Місяць тому

      @@bartbannister394oh ok. You’re a 🧌. Bye bye

  • @thomashardison1140
    @thomashardison1140 Місяць тому +1

    Isn't the TR essentially 'a' critical text as well, just from the past? Anyway, NKJV is great and I've been enjoying it anew lately. How would you rate the paper/ghosting in this edition? Thanks for sharing!

    • @NeedAVacay-y5u
      @NeedAVacay-y5u 2 дні тому

      Not really. Not exactly. The TR philosophy was not refined from the manuscripts they had. They simply didn't have the wealth of information we have now and just had to go with the reading they had. You'll notice that TR is 98% similar to the majority text. The ESVs tyndale house Greek New Testament adopts the similar approach in taking the majority of readings in older manuscripts. They just cut off the data to certain period to make sure they're using the majority of readings from only a couple centuries after Jesus. However the critical text behind most other Bibles is different trying to get to the heart of the oldest readings or even reconstruction of readings. So I would say the the critical text that specifically is used by the ESV has the best philosophy. While the critical text of most other Bibles is lacking. I don't believe we ever lost a single reading of the Bible they're over 100 verses that are not found in any manuscript in the critical text. This is because they've hodgepodged these verses together from all multiple readings. This doesn't make much sense honestly.

  • @jamestrotter3162
    @jamestrotter3162 2 місяці тому +1

    The NLT is also based on the Critical text.

    • @frostLeather
      @frostLeather  2 місяці тому +1

      It is unfortunately, why it's good to keep a KJV or NKJV around.

  • @elizabethneedham6019
    @elizabethneedham6019 2 місяці тому

    This would be a great give away if you aren’t going to use it!!🙋🏻‍♀️
    I started watching when I wanted to recover a Bible of mine! Thanks for such great details!

  • @SJ-0044
    @SJ-0044 2 місяці тому +2

    I read the NASB , ESV or NKJV

  • @danielsteinberg5281
    @danielsteinberg5281 Місяць тому

    Thanks for the video. I do have a question. I have never read the NLT or the NIV. Is there a reason you would recommend one over the other. I would like to include another translation in my rotation. I just recently started the NKJV after only seriously reading the KJV. I do appreciate the NKJV.
    Thank you.

    • @nobodyspecial1852
      @nobodyspecial1852 Місяць тому

      The NIV is clear and easy to read throughout and doesn't lose any rhetorical devices but the nuance is turned down. NLT is a bit simplified plus getting colloquialisms and measurements into contemporary/imperial format, does lose some rhetorical device effect and the nuance isn't as much in the interpretation of the reader but how it's written (translation bias).
      NIV can be bland but thorough enough, you can miss stuff in NLT but it's a better read.... they accomplish the same thing but I prefer the NIV.
      ESV, GWttN, NRSV, NASB 95/20.... go try anything that sounds good to you.

    • @danielsteinberg5281
      @danielsteinberg5281 Місяць тому

      @@nobodyspecial1852 thank you! That helped a lot. I may try the NLT and see how that goes.

    • @nobodyspecial1852
      @nobodyspecial1852 Місяць тому +1

      @@danielsteinberg5281 when you want to remove the awkward or read through a big stretch, it's the champ. Even if you don't use it as anything but an auxiliary, you'll enjoy it.

  • @danielianello
    @danielianello Місяць тому

    As odd as it might be, one of my biggest dislikes with the ESV is how hard it is to find a red letter edition. Practically every edition of the NKJV is red letter. I think my next bible will be a Cambridge Diadem, pretty much the only option.

  • @NateDaniel
    @NateDaniel 2 місяці тому

    Amen! I keep praying for a NKJV NLT parallel Bible like the current People Parallel that is available!
    Also, Are you able to rebind the Gideons Pocket New Testament? Having one of those in a durable leather would be awesome!

    • @frostLeather
      @frostLeather  2 місяці тому

      IF they made a NKJV/NLT parallel, that would be pretty rad.
      You can have a Gideons rebound, but we are not taking custom orders anymore. But there are many great binderies that could do it for you!

    • @bartbannister394
      @bartbannister394 2 місяці тому

      I love the ESV, it works better than anything I ever used. That includes Charmin, Scotts Tissue and the NKJV. It tends to clog up the plumbing once and awhile, but I am relaxed, clean and chaff free. Praise Jesus!

  • @Agitated_Hamster
    @Agitated_Hamster Місяць тому

    I'm trying to find someone to do a binding for me. Do you know anyone that accepts custom orders? My Bible is a unique bible translation that only is available in hardback, but I was hoping to find someone to bind it to a genuine leather.

  • @JoanKing-f2t
    @JoanKing-f2t Місяць тому

    Patricia Ports

  • @TraceyGreen-b8c
    @TraceyGreen-b8c Місяць тому

    Allene Expressway

  • @KennanHerbert-v4u
    @KennanHerbert-v4u Місяць тому

    Sanford Camp

  • @christophersmeltser6564
    @christophersmeltser6564 Місяць тому +2

    Weird question but would you consider selling that Bible? I want one but can’t pay $50 for a new one. Thank you.

  • @NieshaAdi-n1r
    @NieshaAdi-n1r 2 місяці тому

    Randy Forest

  • @danielpickrell8311
    @danielpickrell8311 2 місяці тому

    Big difference. NKJV Pauls write as the church is saved while ESV Paul as being Saved. Are you working for your Salvation to get to Heaven?

    • @NeedAVacay-y5u
      @NeedAVacay-y5u 2 дні тому

      NKJV also has The being saved I believe. None of these translators believe that you have to work for your salvation but that Greek word was used in a current tense and could be translated as such.

  • @SilasChristopher-n3h
    @SilasChristopher-n3h 2 місяці тому

    Fadel Meadows

  • @MaryDavila-f9j
    @MaryDavila-f9j Місяць тому

    D'Amore Bypass

  • @martinlohne5128
    @martinlohne5128 2 місяці тому

    Yes, and why use the NKJV when we have the KJV?

    • @danielpickrell8311
      @danielpickrell8311 2 місяці тому

      For me so I don't have to read a sentence over and over again because of English lol.

    • @martinlohne5128
      @martinlohne5128 2 місяці тому

      @@danielpickrell8311 Yes, it's easy reading even if it's wrong.

  • @fgfgddfsgfg-c3d
    @fgfgddfsgfg-c3d Місяць тому

    Mohr Ford

  • @ryanestess6919
    @ryanestess6919 23 дні тому

    I think the English in the NKJV is clunky. I prefer the KJV and ESV.

  • @LeonardoScriver-f6n
    @LeonardoScriver-f6n Місяць тому

    Treva Shoal

  • @bigtobacco1098
    @bigtobacco1098 2 місяці тому +2

    No scholars use a single source

    • @frostLeather
      @frostLeather  2 місяці тому +1

      That's probably true!

    • @bartbannister394
      @bartbannister394 2 місяці тому

      I love the ESV, it works better than anything I ever used. That includes Charmin, Scotts Tissue and the NKJV. It tends to clog up the plumbing once and awhile, but I am relaxed, clean and chaff free. Praise Jesus!

    • @bigtobacco1098
      @bigtobacco1098 2 місяці тому +1

      @bartbannister394 like the kjv and its added words 👌

  • @LarryWilson-c4e
    @LarryWilson-c4e Місяць тому

    Sheldon Track

  • @HodgsonBart-n1r
    @HodgsonBart-n1r 2 місяці тому

    Abbott Parks

  • @davegarciaofficial
    @davegarciaofficial День тому

    This was the most confusing video ever. Lol. Saying the ESV and anything between the NKjV and the NLT and are unnecessary, and that you’re back to the NKjV, then why even bother promoting this ESV? Kinda weird 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @EzraCansler
    @EzraCansler 2 місяці тому +3

    The KJV fulfills them all, my friend. Everyone has a right to an opinion. I hold the opinion that the KJV is the only English version of the Bible that is directly inspired by God. Amen.

    • @DLB1858
      @DLB1858 2 місяці тому +5

      It is your opinion but it is flawed. If it is the only English Bible directly inspired by God why is the Apocrypha removed since it was originally included.

    • @EzraCansler
      @EzraCansler 2 місяці тому +1

      @@DLB1858
      That’s exactly why they were removed. Because the KJV is inspired and the apocrypha is not.

    • @WontonDisciple
      @WontonDisciple 2 місяці тому +6

      Where do you get this idea of double inspiration?

    • @EzraCansler
      @EzraCansler 2 місяці тому +2

      @@WontonDisciple
      There is no double inspiration. God inspired the Bible one time, through the writers, and God has perfectly preserved His word in different languages.

    • @WontonDisciple
      @WontonDisciple 2 місяці тому +3

      @@EzraCansler if that's the case then you don't need to hold to the KJV as being the only inspired English text