Aircraft Carrier KILLER || Sea Power Gameplay - New Naval Simulation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 743

  • @Wolfpack345
    @Wolfpack345  29 днів тому +668

    Yes, this was a lucky hit and no you can not always sink a carrier with one missile in game. You can run this scenario 100 times in game and you will get 100 different outcomes. I played the mission again and the CV took 3 hits and still continued to fight the damage. The Damage model is quite robust and there are plenty of different outcomes depending on hit placement. You can however get lucky like I did in this video.

    • @FerroEquus-262
      @FerroEquus-262 29 днів тому +82

      That Granit flew right into the hanger and detonated the jet fuel along with all the munitions, a very lucky hit. 😁

    • @battleship6177
      @battleship6177 29 днів тому +13

      @FerroEquus-262 that would be "lucky" if the jet fuel was stored there. Plus since it's the forward hangar bay it would be contained to that bay (with the doors being closed) and most likely erupt out the #1 elevator and not penetrate the lower armoured decks.

    • @FinnishJager
      @FinnishJager 29 днів тому +46

      In one of my tests of this mission the Americans kept shooting down my waves of missiles. The few that got through then just targeted the Ticonderoga! My Oscar was empty and the carrier laughed at me.

    • @tspencer227
      @tspencer227 29 днів тому +14

      @@FerroEquus-262 That's not where the jet fuel and munitions are stored.
      -former carrier sailor

    • @alexalbrecht5768
      @alexalbrecht5768 28 днів тому +4

      @@tspencer227 just wait until they learn that there are dedicated munitions elevators that pull weapons from special magazines buried deep in the ship. WW2 taught many valuable lessons.

  • @DecidedlyNinja
    @DecidedlyNinja 29 днів тому +1433

    Notice how the carrier's deck crew remained at their posts even when the ship was underwater. True American patriots!

    • @battleship6177
      @battleship6177 29 днів тому +68

      It's always funny to me because I imagine myself on there thinking "we not gonna abandon ship? Ight I guess not"

    • @TheBelrick
      @TheBelrick 29 днів тому +66

      IMHO the ultimate success of this game depends upon modding support. It will truly become legendary if opened up to the community. We can end up seeing planes sliding off of the deck and animated crews jumping ship etc.

    • @NoNamesLeft388
      @NoNamesLeft388 29 днів тому +20

      @@TheBelrickWorkshop support will be in there on day one!

    • @keithbaker1951
      @keithbaker1951 29 днів тому +3

      It's how a country wins wars! 😂

    • @sebastianthehotsaucedude5473
      @sebastianthehotsaucedude5473 29 днів тому +3

      🇺🇲🇺🇲🚢🫡

  • @sovieticodiabetico6874
    @sovieticodiabetico6874 29 днів тому +322

    My excitement is immesurable and my day is saved

    • @incorrectbeans
      @incorrectbeans 29 днів тому +22

      Friendship ended with Cold Waters. Sea Power is my new best friend.

  • @tbe0116
    @tbe0116 29 днів тому +490

    The Oscar wasn’t designed to be frugal with its missiles. If you have a carrier group in range, you fire everything.

    • @cf3714
      @cf3714 29 днів тому +8

      Pretty sure the first Oscars were limited by their fire control to how many missiles they could fire within a certain period.

    • @sheogorath979
      @sheogorath979 29 днів тому +123

      ​@@cf3714 Shipwrecks are pretty autonomous, you could fire all 24 at a general directions and they'll pick and choose targets according to radar return and conduct evasive maneuvers by themselves

    • @alexeyshapovalov1353
      @alexeyshapovalov1353 29 днів тому +73

      @@cf3714they could fire all missiles without limitations

    • @FerroEquus-262
      @FerroEquus-262 29 днів тому +70

      The Granit was probably the most 'intelligent' cruise missile of the 1980s.

    • @FlightLine4240
      @FlightLine4240 29 днів тому +15

      @@sheogorath979that’s pretty nutty. Do you know if they had a form of datalink to avoid doubling up on targets?

  • @coopergoebel9943
    @coopergoebel9943 29 днів тому +272

    Fun fact for any new viewer k 206 was wolfs primary sub in his cold waters epic mod Russian play through in which he sunk in excess of 500 thousand tons over the episodes

    • @tacticalcalebgaming7264
      @tacticalcalebgaming7264 29 днів тому +1

      Yes

    • @TheBelrick
      @TheBelrick 29 днів тому +13

      Im glad that they fixed the damage from granat hits. In a prior game he hit a carrier with 5 and the ship suffered practically no damage.

    • @FMJIRISH
      @FMJIRISH 29 днів тому +8

      Epic mod is the very definition of Russian bias lol

    • @coopergoebel9943
      @coopergoebel9943 29 днів тому +7

      @@FMJIRISH both of the main mods are in very interesting situations right now unfortunately

    • @yester8039
      @yester8039 29 днів тому +9

      @@TheBelrick Its excesive now, only 1 hit not that low in the waterline, in the frontal part of the carrier should make major damage to the hangars and catapults, but not straight up sink it in seconds

  • @BrownwaterSquid
    @BrownwaterSquid 29 днів тому +138

    Fun fact: My dad was on the plane (P3C) to get the first ever images and solid data on the Oscar. Caught her off the coast of Okinawa someplace. I have a frame from the on-board camera reel that remains one of my most prized possessions. Glad these guys did the sub justice because damn it's a looker.

    • @Secretgeek2012
      @Secretgeek2012 29 днів тому +1

      That's awesome! Thanks for sharing.

    • @thisherehandleIdospout
      @thisherehandleIdospout 28 днів тому +4

      Don't suppose you might be allowed (and so inclined 😅) to share a picture of said frame with us unwashed plebs... would you?
      🥺

    • @BrownwaterSquid
      @BrownwaterSquid 28 днів тому

      @@thisherehandleIdospout I'll have to dig it out, it's just a photo of her on the surface.

    • @ethansevilla1395
      @ethansevilla1395 27 днів тому

      Was the Oscar’s sub called Arkhangelsk?

    • @ayylmao1558
      @ayylmao1558 21 годину тому

      @@BrownwaterSquid did you find it

  • @pbdye1607
    @pbdye1607 29 днів тому +67

    18:48: That wake homer just deciding it's not worth it.

  • @Midcon77
    @Midcon77 29 днів тому +30

    The ONLY thing that would have made this better is to see the planes sliding off the deck as the carrier sunk. Great vid as always!

  • @mumblerinc.6660
    @mumblerinc.6660 29 днів тому +122

    CIWS seems *very* unimpressive still: either they keep firing way, waaay high starting off, or they just don't fire at all.
    On another note, hoping the devs will add some random timer between when a ship is sunk and when lifeboats start spawning in around it. It'd look much more natural if they start popping up gradually at least no more than a minute after a ship has been destroyed.

    • @FerroEquus-262
      @FerroEquus-262 29 днів тому +12

      It's as if CIWS doesn't exist.

    • @Spendingryan
      @Spendingryan 29 днів тому +13

      My theories are, something simple like they forgot to turn on radars, or activate the Phalanx CIWS (happened in real life, OHP Frigate didn't have the CIWS turned on and the missile hit the ship) or it could be either its an old version of CIWS, older ones in the 80's or 90's probably look similar to the ones used today, but the ones used today have different names like Phalanx Block 2 or something, and can aim faster and react quicker, or maybe its because AEGIS does not exist yet so CIWS can't respond quickly with other weapons.

    • @Psytinker
      @Psytinker 29 днів тому +23

      If it's Block 0, it stands for "Christ! It Won't Shoot!"

    • @Spendingryan
      @Spendingryan 29 днів тому +4

      @@Psytinker lol, I wonder if anyone watching has any experience with this weapon, probably right?
      Might be biased but I still think the american Phalanx is the probably one of, if not the best bullet based CIWS, the Pantsir, or Kashtan or whatever they're called might have more barrels or bigger calibers, there's a Chinese one too that has a crazy amount of barrels, but it's the reaction and aim time that counts first.

    • @Psytinker
      @Psytinker 29 днів тому +18

      @@Spendingryan Not allowing the sub to shoot is what counts first. If you're at a point you're using point defenses, you already failed. Using CIWC is your last prayer.

  • @tubecrafter9980
    @tubecrafter9980 29 днів тому +35

    3:26 The Lütjens class were Charles F Adams Class destroyers the Germans bought in the early sixty’s and delivered late sixty’s to early seventy’s.

    • @dominics.4474
      @dominics.4474 29 днів тому +3

      my dad served on the Lütjens in the 90s

  • @UrthmanOne
    @UrthmanOne 28 днів тому +5

    This channel is my all-time favorite Military Sim Channel! Your commentary is excellent and informative. Thanks for all that you do! 😀

  • @shockwave6213
    @shockwave6213 8 днів тому +3

    17:04 Yeah, that missile trajectory puts it on course to punch right through the outer wall and absolutely smash everything in the open hangar bays and potentially any munitions rolling free outside their magazines. That shot placement could not have been any better.

  • @liljonrules5657
    @liljonrules5657 29 днів тому +73

    It's so nice to see someone who actually knows how to play the game. Though I appreciate other channels that post Sea Power content, I've found I can't watch much as the players are often clearly clueless about how modern naval warfare works, and what's worse seem to make no attempt to learn and get better. So you just end up with a mess of a scenario that doesn't do much to show off the game.
    Also glad to hear the devs are working on helos dropping sonobuoys. Love the scenario but it's a rather broken if the US can't use ASW aircraft. Can't think of any situations where a carrier battle group wouldn't have plenty of ASW assets up and about.

    • @TheBelrick
      @TheBelrick 29 днів тому +8

      Yep, less about being clueless and frankly just not intelligent enough. People think this is a grave insult, it really isn't . We are all inequal with different stats and traits.

    • @incorrectbeans
      @incorrectbeans 29 днів тому +5

      you must be a lot of fun at parties

    • @subjectc7505
      @subjectc7505 29 днів тому +13

      Everyone has a different skillset and can learn off screen. The "Clueless" are ones who just got into the art of naval combat and aren't gonna immediately catch on. I have a problem with how people play most games but it's entertaining watching them slowly get better and have a different style than everyone else.

    • @vito7428
      @vito7428 29 днів тому

      ​​@@TheBelrickYou might be intelligent enough to understand naval warfare but certainly not emotionally intelligent enough to understand why some people might take offense to being told'Yeah you're just kinda too dumb honestly'

    • @vito7428
      @vito7428 29 днів тому +4

      ​​@@subjectc7505It's almost as if...*gasp*people get better at things they do as they do more of it. Some people adapt faster while others take longer to learn. But clearly according to OP only actual 5 star admirals can play this game and make content about it. If you don't exactly know what to right off the bat,you really just shouldn't be allowed to play apparently

  • @kosmicvalkyrie
    @kosmicvalkyrie 29 днів тому +5

    I'm really digging the sounds and weapon animations, adds so much atmosphere that was missing from cold waters. Just hearing the victor going to flank gave me shivers

  • @catlowontour2641
    @catlowontour2641 29 днів тому +12

    Holy hell the music choice is spot on for this behemoth, really gives that unsettlingly large aura

    • @discarding_sabot8253
      @discarding_sabot8253 29 днів тому +3

      Isn't it the trumpet blast from the show Chernobyl? It sounds familiar (other than terrifying)

  • @forrestallison1879
    @forrestallison1879 29 днів тому +49

    I feel like the AI in the game might be lacking. If they detected you and were on active, shouldn't they also have been launching tons of ASW aircraft? It's a carrier afer all, that's what they do and it's what you would have done.
    Ah I see, the AI is not done in that area. Too bad as sonobouys would have been the main countermeasure here, the engagement doesn't seem complete with them being able to fight back

    • @texoschannel4907
      @texoschannel4907 29 днів тому

      It’s version 0.1 , it’s almost alpha :)

    • @jackwalters5506
      @jackwalters5506 3 дні тому

      Surface fleets probably turn on active sonar periodically since being quiet isn't really a concern for them

  • @TheKingHomer
    @TheKingHomer 29 днів тому +48

    Finally a new Sea Power video :)

  • @A123-d8o
    @A123-d8o 29 днів тому +10

    fun fact; the granite missile can only be launched from under water for some reason and the kirov has to flood its VLS cells with seawater to do so.

    • @bruceyawen6160
      @bruceyawen6160 28 днів тому +2

      Prolly the water is needed to absorb the shockwaves of the booster

    • @platiuscyndar9017
      @platiuscyndar9017 28 днів тому +3

      The missile is designed for wet launch. That includes the fact the missile is designed around the water absorbing part of the heat and shockwave like bruce said to prevent damaging the VLS. It's something you can get away with when designing a sub missile.

  • @_tyrannus
    @_tyrannus 29 днів тому +20

    The production value and skill in your Sea Power exceed all other gameplay I've found to scratch the itch until the game goes on sale.👌 One slight comment though - mild spoiler ahead - Granit ASMs should almost always be fired as a full salvo. A Charlie is not going ot be tasked on two carrier groups in one sortie, and gameplay-wise this is just a single mission as well, so there is no reason to spare. Since they coordinate on target selection, there is no risk of overkilling the largest radar signature like with less evolved ASMs. The more you launch, the fewer in the swarm have to expose themselves to long range SAMs by playing spotter on the way to the target. The Soviet taxpayer would just have to tighten his belt for a bit, but since this scenario involves blowing up a US carrier group, Granit price would be the least of his problems.😅

    • @mymanager3662
      @mymanager3662 26 днів тому

      I agree. It was exceptionally lucky that only 8 missiles did the job here but leaves two more salvos. However if the first salvo doesn't succeed and maybe even gets entirely intercepted, you have gained little to nothing but wasted a bunch of missiles. The larger the group in one attack, the larger the percentage of missiles getting to a target
      With ASMs I would say 'overkill is underrated'

  • @Alexx120493
    @Alexx120493 29 днів тому +28

    11:37 maybe just something for the devs: The 65/76 torpedo can only be fired from the two large upper torpedo tubes as they are 65cm in diameter. The four lower torpedo tubes are only 53cm in diameter

    • @marduk87
      @marduk87 29 днів тому +1

      Thats what i thougth(i know nothing about subs) and i was very suprised when i saw the larger torpedoes being fired from the visualy smaller torpedo tubes.
      Certainly worth reporting to Sea Power devs!

    • @justicier10-7
      @justicier10-7 28 днів тому +6

      No, they got it right, the two lower center tubes are the 650mm, the 533mm tubes surround the 650mm. This is the configuration of other russian subs as well

    • @Kwaj
      @Kwaj 26 днів тому

      @@justicier10-7 No, they didn't get it right. Official schematics of the Victor-III show the largest torpedoes (65-76) in a separate torpedo room ABOVE the lower torpedo room housing the smaller caliber weapons (SET-65K, TEST-71MK, USET-80).

    • @justicier10-7
      @justicier10-7 25 днів тому +4

      @@Kwaj I'd be interested to see your source for the schematics. All the schematics I have seen have shown 533mm torpedos in the lower torpedo storage(sitting behind the sonar), and 650s sit on the floor of the top torpedo room, which loads straight into the lower middle two tubes, which are longer/larger, and the shorter/smaller two tubes for 533mm sitting on the top with the reloads hoisted up from the lower torpedo room.

    • @Kwaj
      @Kwaj 25 днів тому +6

      @@justicier10-7 Upon further review, you're right. I just looked at the schematic and noticed that the larger torps are on the bottom set of tubes which are longer with respect to their placement in the hull.
      They got it right, I had it wrong.

  • @DocRoe92
    @DocRoe92 28 днів тому +2

    Awesome video, thanks for uploading Wolfpack! One observation, it's a tad false being able to share a single tactical picture amongst three units whilst dived, but obviously it is a game at the end of the day! Looking forward to the next one!

  • @Directrix_Gazer
    @Directrix_Gazer 29 днів тому +243

    The only issue I can see with this is that the omniscience of the player means that you can have multiple submarines, as well as submarines and surface ships, cooperate in ways that aren't possible in real life.

    • @bunuslippur2238
      @bunuslippur2238 29 днів тому +113

      some omissions have to be made for the sake of gameplay.

    • @Bebecazancioc24
      @Bebecazancioc24 29 днів тому +58

      Yeah, but it's still a game and i think it's way more better to control a task force made up of subs and warships then one sub or one warship like in cold waters...

    • @ralgith
      @ralgith 29 днів тому +52

      This could be explained by having really good:
      1. ROE
      2. Standing Orders
      3. Mission Planning for coordinated operations

    • @Firewalker1988
      @Firewalker1988 29 днів тому +48

      On the other hand the units are less autonomous than in real life - the admiral does not tell a single fighter when to turn radar on and off 😊 It's a game after all 🤷‍♂️

    • @KeithWaltonArmyStrong
      @KeithWaltonArmyStrong 29 днів тому +1

      Also on the other hand I don't believe you can control torps cold waters style

  • @scottybrugmann8257
    @scottybrugmann8257 29 днів тому +3

    Your Sea Power videos are the best, great editing and coments ,can wait for the next one .Thanks

  • @alexanderleach3365
    @alexanderleach3365 29 днів тому +18

    The power of an Oscar-class SSGN.

  • @Sky_Burger88
    @Sky_Burger88 12 днів тому +1

    One thing that should be simulated here, American ASW ships have the ability to use a dipping sonar. This sonar can go deep below the layer. American ASW can place their sensors both above and below the layer at the same time. This gives ASW ships one advantage over submarines.

  • @DaweSMF
    @DaweSMF 28 днів тому +1

    Cool to see ships can now properly defend themselves against missiles. I like what i see and specialy how everything is modeled down to the point of opening hatches and small details like that, very cool. Did hear people say the graphics isnt very good but i think they are spoiled - did hear that from dude who runs simulations in DCS, the ships there are models made by enthusiast mod makers with infinite ammount of time and no need to look much into performance impact or overall detail balance so one model isnt crazy detailed nad second on the other side of spectrum. I think thats wher those voices come from.

  • @DeadBaron
    @DeadBaron 29 днів тому +2

    Man I can't wait. I absolutely love how everything is better animated than Cold Waters was.

  • @ChaosphereIX
    @ChaosphereIX 29 днів тому +1

    Wolfpack, you are one of the best. Loved the vid thanks for the high production value. Immensely enjoyed

  • @alanhouk1427
    @alanhouk1427 29 днів тому +1

    Woohoo! The Oscar and The Typhoon are my favorite non-american subs! There is just something about that giant rudder/propeller system that I love

  • @SCMDR
    @SCMDR 29 днів тому +2

    Wow you took my suggestion too heart. I love it keep up the good work.

  • @Grayson203
    @Grayson203 29 днів тому +1

    Been waiting for someone to play an Oscar, super stoked for this video!
    Keep up the fantastic work Wolfpack!! 🍻

  • @Lankygit01
    @Lankygit01 29 днів тому

    i love how even when sinking, the aircraft and deck crew stayed where they were

  • @ThatNiceDutchGuy
    @ThatNiceDutchGuy 29 днів тому +6

    18:47 top left. Some torpedo came by.

  • @captainjonna1034
    @captainjonna1034 26 днів тому

    This game looks like such a straight up expansion and upgrade from cold waters, it seems even more in depth, it has animations and actual rendered towed array's......and....and we can control more than one vessel which is huge, amongst many other great selling points i've seen thanks to your content wolfpack and another youtuber known as : Stealth17 Gaming and the devs being kind and smart enough to let you gents showcase this to us early, i've only seen one or two vids so far of sea power and i'm hands down already sold, game seems to have a really bright and expansive future ahead of it.....can't wait, great video Wolfpack as usual, 🙂

  • @omgitsbees
    @omgitsbees 27 днів тому

    The water effect as it consumes the boat, looks great, its very realistic looking.

  • @MrTastyM7
    @MrTastyM7 29 днів тому

    You really know how to get some cinematic shots, got goosebumps at 8:20-8:30

  • @Arks1103
    @Arks1103 29 днів тому

    The Oscar firing such heavy missiles is so amazing, looks so great, however, that plume could be noticed from the moon i guess.

  • @farisshaikh1026
    @farisshaikh1026 29 днів тому +1

    its interesting to see how different players tackle the same scenarios.

  • @Lfcsweden-n5m
    @Lfcsweden-n5m 29 днів тому +6

    This game must get a multiplayer function in the future, that would be sick!!

  • @D64nz
    @D64nz 13 днів тому

    NGL - I'm so jealous that so many YTr's got to play this early, but I'm sure it gives a high level of feedback for the game. Still, 3 more days until release! I'm really looking forward to it.

  • @_fruitnveg
    @_fruitnveg 29 днів тому +1

    Deck crew staying stalwartly in position as the ship goes down o7

  • @jab2505
    @jab2505 29 днів тому

    I love this channel and your content. It's hard for me as a former US Navy ASW warrior to route for you against NATO forces, lol.

  • @TheHighlander5555
    @TheHighlander5555 29 днів тому +4

    Sad to see an American carrier get sunk. Awesome to see the USS Scott (DDG 995) in action, it's my favorite ship.

    • @Cpt_Flatbird
      @Cpt_Flatbird 29 днів тому

      Curious, why that one in particular ?

    • @joeblow8379
      @joeblow8379 21 день тому +1

      In real life there would an escort so this game is very fictionalized. They even gave Russia a fake aircraft carrier that never even existed (never built). The Orel

    • @TheHighlander5555
      @TheHighlander5555 20 днів тому +1

      @@Cpt_Flatbird It has my name.

  • @Jacob_Crowthorne
    @Jacob_Crowthorne 4 дні тому +1

    Whoa! Are they really that vulnerable?!!

  • @joe-nf8go
    @joe-nf8go 24 дні тому

    Awesome vid. Lovely cinematography

  • @LethinGabbins
    @LethinGabbins 29 днів тому

    But does the k206 come with a soft serve ice cream dispenser?!
    Great vids. Love your work. Keep it up!!!

  • @Lightning_aus
    @Lightning_aus 29 днів тому +5

    18:47 - random torpedo says hi on the left of screen

  • @Wrahns
    @Wrahns 28 днів тому

    One day we will get a Nuktipkayer version of a game like this where we can Wolfpack with our friends against US and Russian fleets as either side.

  • @alvaropindado1804
    @alvaropindado1804 29 днів тому +3

    I discovered this channel 2 weeks ago and I'm binging on every video like its the last one I'll ever see. Amazing content

  • @crispinmunns6636
    @crispinmunns6636 28 днів тому

    When ever Wolfpack talks about a towed array does anyone else think toad 🐸 array?

  • @Bellator151
    @Bellator151 28 днів тому

    great showcase thanks to your editing & gameplay skills!

  • @ComRed_October
    @ComRed_October 29 днів тому

    all these scenarios are soo sick, keep up making videos of this game!

  • @Dabocado
    @Dabocado 26 днів тому

    I tried to watch this 7 times and fell asleep each time.

  • @Sr_Sem
    @Sr_Sem 11 днів тому

    I never was interested in military fleet unlike other forces, but damn, it looks facinating.

  • @Fighterpilot555
    @Fighterpilot555 28 днів тому +2

    NATO reporting name of the Granit is "Shipwreck"... like. Yeah dude!

  • @Depriest42
    @Depriest42 29 днів тому

    Got to hand it to em, the soviets submarine fleets definitely had a nice aesthetic.

  • @Karyovin
    @Karyovin 29 днів тому

    Sounds similar to what happened to the USS Langley Battle Group and the Carrier itself in the book: The Sixth Battle
    After mauling the Kiev, Novorossiysk and Kuznetsov BGs with Harpoons, HARMs and Skippers (Real Hard Hitters) they got hit and badly worn down by Granits, Backfires and a wake homer finished the Langley off.
    Her Air wing did mostly evac to South Africa to continue the fight.

  • @unwantedvoid1678
    @unwantedvoid1678 2 дні тому

    The idea was never about sinking the carrier or other ships in the CSG via conventional weapons. All Antey (or Oscar 2) subs were armed with the nuclear warheads. So, there was no need to make it pass all or most of the rockets through the CSG missile defense systems. Just one of it.

  • @2rhx
    @2rhx 29 днів тому +1

    I'll buy this game! FInally a game what we wanted and finally its here!

  • @MarvinBoydCo
    @MarvinBoydCo 27 днів тому

    cannot express how much I cannot wait to play this game

  • @M3dicayne
    @M3dicayne 17 днів тому

    8:59 - "...Part of me is wondering if we are detected." - Russian submarines are detected once leaving port in Russia. An American submarine sonar officer once said, "Finding a Russian submarine is like trying to find a Cadillac from the 60's just by hearing. With it having a broken exhaust and dozens of cans, mounted with metal chains to the back of the car".

  • @RonJeremy514
    @RonJeremy514 28 днів тому

    This game is "instant purchase" material. Can't wait!

  • @Hansiwansi
    @Hansiwansi 29 днів тому

    Sio many scenarios you can do! I love aircarrier missions too! Awesome to see how the airplanes start!

  • @kalashnikovdevil
    @kalashnikovdevil 29 днів тому +1

    Damage model and air defense still seems a bit wonky. Still, very cool Oscar scenario. Nice to see you in command of K-206 again Wolfpack.

  • @donnym3415
    @donnym3415 29 днів тому +10

    Oh hey look it's the sub that ate sh*t in your cold waters series
    Also yay another video😊

  • @sharker2003
    @sharker2003 28 днів тому

    Great video! Question: Does it have a replay / VCR feature that let's you cut around to get all those great dramatic shots? I loved that feature in the old Aces series when I was a kid and wish that more of a feature in modern games.

  • @dsdy1205
    @dsdy1205 29 днів тому

    With Oscars like these, who needs Kirovs?

  • @trazyntheinfinite9895
    @trazyntheinfinite9895 29 днів тому +1

    Btw: in shitty seas, surface the boat, actively search, then button up, sprint away. You will be gone long before the answer arrives.

  • @rainy5079
    @rainy5079 29 днів тому

    The USS America is actually the ship my dad served on! that's cool!

  • @Mrdrcaptaintroy
    @Mrdrcaptaintroy 29 днів тому

    The Oscar is so cool. I'm so glad to it in the game

  • @timdehoogh8441
    @timdehoogh8441 27 днів тому

    As I watch the Carrier sinking I noticed that none of the planes that were on the deck did not fall off through out the engagement the carrier didn't put up any fighters or bombers I think the S3 Viking is considered an anti submarine hunter

  • @jacobh.3546
    @jacobh.3546 29 днів тому

    Mom! There's a new Wolfpack345 video!!

  • @efkelley
    @efkelley 28 днів тому

    So, I'm pretty deaf, and need to use the auto-generated subtitles. Can't tell you how hilarious it was to see you deploying the "toad" sonar arrays. XD

  • @jbarry39
    @jbarry39 2 дні тому

    Nice opening...Finnish Jaeger needs to put more scenarios in the Workshop

  • @legiox3719
    @legiox3719 27 днів тому

    I feel like that sub needs a “wide load” banner on the bow and stern.

  • @ethanmcdowell9677
    @ethanmcdowell9677 19 днів тому

    As the son of a USS America veteran, this is a much better fate than being sunk as a SINKEX by your own Navy.

  • @anandaalden1249
    @anandaalden1249 18 днів тому

    been a while since last time i play Command: Modern Operations that forced me to read all ftheory, watching this gamplay is refreshing....

  • @Agora2021
    @Agora2021 29 днів тому

    I need the music you use in this video, it's very fitting and ominous.

  • @RoryV7
    @RoryV7 28 днів тому

    I like all the details in all the little animations. 👍

  • @Floki255
    @Floki255 28 днів тому +1

    Fire all Granites in one go.

  • @JClark2600
    @JClark2600 28 днів тому +1

    Old SSGN soviet ships could only launch a handful of these missiles at a time. It took some amount of time to get the fire control to switch missile banks. I really want to get my hands on the game so I can mod it to realistic systems. The game does a good job over all but some of the details like what types of torps a German sub would carry and shot along with this Soviet fire control system, they need an update patch. Yes I know it's a game but as a game dev you never want your game to end up like World of Warships.

    • @joeblow8379
      @joeblow8379 21 день тому +1

      They also gave Russia a FAKE aircraft carrier in this game. The Orel was never even built

  • @wally4395
    @wally4395 29 днів тому

    Thanks for a great episode. Really enjoyed.

  • @pappagrumpy6210
    @pappagrumpy6210 29 днів тому

    Im as ignorant as can be to A I , however it seams to me its very passive aggressive compared to how a human would play. Love your vids and keep them coming

  • @allistercarolussen3701
    @allistercarolussen3701 29 днів тому

    Really enjoying the series wilfpack

  • @WGi-q3s
    @WGi-q3s 29 днів тому

    Love to see the tube doors operating

  • @robertwilson3250
    @robertwilson3250 16 днів тому

    This game has such great potential. Add at least other NATO units and the entire UK and French fleet. Varied European countries fleets would make this game more realistic. It is not just the US against whomever.

  • @masswolf
    @masswolf 29 днів тому +11

    I know it’s just a game but it breaks my heart to see an American carrier go down. My brother was on the USS Kitty Hawk.

    • @parislikesliners
      @parislikesliners 28 днів тому +1

      I thank him for his service!

    • @Wrahns
      @Wrahns 28 днів тому +8

      Imagine how others must feel when they see other countries assets getting destroyed in games by the US. Humbling, isnt it? Sorry for your loss. And thank you for his service.

    • @alphana7055
      @alphana7055 26 днів тому

      ​@@parislikesliners His service of murdering poor people for Israel?

  • @testme625
    @testme625 29 днів тому

    HE'S BACK WITH MORE SEA POWER!!!!!!!

  • @dl0g09
    @dl0g09 29 днів тому

    16:55
    "Second wave of missile inbound 10 seconds to impact"
    "Counter with artillery barrage"
    "We can't hit all of them, brace for impact"
    17:05
    **BOOM**
    "Starboard side flood, damage control"
    "We been hit by 2 sub-launched missile, the ship listing"
    18:09
    "She's sinking, the ship's sinking"

  • @sputnik_yuri
    @sputnik_yuri 29 днів тому

    That wasn't abandoning ship, that rocket blew those rafts out of their compartments. 😬

  • @drticcz111
    @drticcz111 20 днів тому

    Dedicated AC killer :D i remember killing ACs in cold waters with akula by sailing at crush debth making the torpedos implode before reaching me :D. But yeah i had to pop up slightly to fire my own, tho they managed to keep the cable after so noice :)

  • @danielroberts652
    @danielroberts652 29 днів тому

    Odd that the masts can’t be raised in rough seas. Typically you would be worried about the current pushing against the mast bending it (usually a speed limit or something), not the waves slapping against it. Sure they’re less effective but you’d still be just fine to raise it.

  • @tovarishleninade9436
    @tovarishleninade9436 29 днів тому

    The first game im going to buy day one!. Looks amazing

  • @ackrazam
    @ackrazam 28 днів тому

    Would you do some naval mine warfare gameplay? I've been always interest about it :)

  • @Lochlyn-k2y
    @Lochlyn-k2y 29 днів тому

    @wolfpack345 great vid! I think it would be a really interesting vid if you were to recreate the Gulf of Tonkin incident that sparked off the Vietnam war.

  • @moistmike4150
    @moistmike4150 28 днів тому

    Well I'm just glad no one got hurt.

  • @goblin2744
    @goblin2744 28 днів тому

    Love watching you play this game

  • @foreverpinkf.7603
    @foreverpinkf.7603 29 днів тому +1

    That was a costly day for the Navy.

  • @bbtbmb
    @bbtbmb 29 днів тому

    great video! thanks oth didnt it take like 2 days for the US Navy to sink the EX America a few years ago in that SinkX and she wasn't even fighting back from what I hear they had to open her seacocks to finally let her go down

  • @TheCalicoKittyGuy
    @TheCalicoKittyGuy 23 дні тому

    Ngl it would be pretty cool if a ship that carries Helos or other aircraft is going down & itll try and take off as many aircraft as possible to try and get them back to an airbase or just tryna give the pilots the best chance at survival, & with the helos they could try and go to another ship (That has the capacity for it) to put some of the sailors on that ship/ other ships & their helos will try and rescue liferafts.