Could Ukraine Have Made The 300km Tu-22 Kill With US AIM-260 Missile? (WarGames 217) | DCS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 тра 2024
  • Today we look at Ukraine's claim shoot down of a Russian Tu-22M3 Backfire last Friday. Most likely they used a modified S-200 surface to air missile. But we investigate whether it could have been done by a the US covertly supplying next generation AIM-260 air to air missiles to Ukraine.
    Mods: • Free DCS Mods (download links in the relevant video)
    Mods: www.currenthill.com/
    PATREON: / grimreapers
    0:00 Overview
    2:34 Scenario Details
    8:11 Mission
    USEFUL LINKS
    GRIM REAPERS (UA-cam): / @grimreapers
    GRIM REAPERS 2 (UA-cam): / @grimreapers2
    GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
    DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
    DCS BUYERS GUIDES: • DCS World Module Quick...
    DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
    MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
    PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
    PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
    STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
    FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
    TWITTER: / grimreapers_
    DISCORD: / discord
    THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
    #WarGames #GRWarGames #AIM260 #JATM #Su35 #ukrainewar #Russia #Ukraine #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #militaryhistory #DCS #DCSWORLD
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 503

  • @grimreapers
    @grimreapers  22 дні тому +18

    Ukraine-Russia Series:
    AIM-260 vs Tu-22M3: ua-cam.com/video/prdALJQ0aQA/v-deo.html
    Ukraine Using F-16: ua-cam.com/video/Ejco_GfPolY/v-deo.html
    A-10 With AASM Hammer: ua-cam.com/video/pnR_K0LGeFo/v-deo.html
    S-200 vs Russian A-50 AWACS: ua-cam.com/video/C8u2exOV-0E/v-deo.html
    Mirage 2000D vs Russian SAMs: ua-cam.com/video/9-Pci_wWsFI/v-deo.html
    Patriot vs Russian A-50 AWACS: ua-cam.com/video/G1rIT8Aj60A/v-deo.html
    Strike On Ropucha In Feodosia: ua-cam.com/video/JuXqdDkKzvE/v-deo.html
    Air-Launched SM-6 vs Moscow: ua-cam.com/video/w65iggPTGWg/v-deo.html
    Ukraine F-16s vs Kerch Bridge: ua-cam.com/video/RYYA0vvpe4U/v-deo.html
    ATACMS Missile vs Russian Bases: ua-cam.com/video/vHWwA4IxcXM/v-deo.html
    Ukr Hits S-400 & Sevastopol: ua-cam.com/video/rwlEc9paJBw/v-deo.html
    F-16s vs Russian Cruise Missiles: ua-cam.com/video/BP3kf5oOezE/v-deo.html
    F-16s vs Odessa Blockade: ua-cam.com/video/VN2oUutiwkw/v-deo.html
    A-10 Clear Minefields: ua-cam.com/video/AhcnXiJdS1I/v-deo.html
    US-Supplied Cluster Bombs: ua-cam.com/video/W4aRf9l5vGQ/v-deo.html
    F/A-18 Hornet vs Su-35: ua-cam.com/video/nRrmU1upBqk/v-deo.html
    F-16A MLU vs Su-35: ua-cam.com/video/FHxPMz5MhdI/v-deo.html
    Patriot vs KH-47M" Kinzhal: ua-cam.com/video/C-q1tWlLh0I/v-deo.html
    Eurofighter vs Su-57: ua-cam.com/video/OnKuV6259ck/v-deo.html
    Rapid Dragon 2 vs Black Sea Fleet: ua-cam.com/video/sHTGKG1cYec/v-deo.html
    MALD, Storm Shadow & AARGM-ER: ua-cam.com/video/d6p0YY_VQZY/v-deo.html
    Storm Shadow vs Russian SAMs: ua-cam.com/video/5wJPbBAj0WM/v-deo.html
    Iskander vs Various SAMS: ua-cam.com/video/KxxahORODBA/v-deo.html
    HIMARS vs Russian SHORADs: ua-cam.com/video/DI6yIt0goPA/v-deo.html
    Storm Shadow vs Kerch Bridge: ua-cam.com/video/UsHa9Fe29gI/v-deo.html
    Rapid Dragon vs Black Sea Fleet: ua-cam.com/video/rvUTl6xjxqY/v-deo.html
    Ukraine With JDAM-ER: ua-cam.com/video/deWnN1319Xw/v-deo.html
    UK Typhoons vs Su-57: ua-cam.com/video/OnKuV6259ck/v-deo.html
    F-22 Raptors vs Russia President: ua-cam.com/video/Fcmt2kdebvI/v-deo.html
    Air Force One vs Russia: ua-cam.com/video/IDVULTyzcEw/v-deo.html
    AGM-179 JAGM vs 2S38 & T-90: ua-cam.com/video/6-f8GJzxg5E/v-deo.html
    SEAD & ATACMS vs Kerch Bridge: ua-cam.com/video/HJ0MgwXydyY/v-deo.html
    IMP US Strike vs Black Sea Fleet: ua-cam.com/video/xSUAiTVwI6o/v-deo.html
    HIMARS ATACMS vs Kerch Bridge: ua-cam.com/video/uU_SPj0HQgo/v-deo.html
    Sa-11 Buk Firing Sea Sparrow: ua-cam.com/video/uBoryuBHfBQ/v-deo.html
    US Strike vs Black Sea Fleet: ua-cam.com/video/KMwYjJghQiA/v-deo.html
    Rus SEAD vs Modernized Patriot: ua-cam.com/video/FdoyfKgaONE/v-deo.html
    Rus Bombers vs Modernized Patriot: ua-cam.com/video/4Y961tLNE18/v-deo.html
    JDAM vs S-400 Network: ua-cam.com/video/wP4sfDG-01E/v-deo.html
    Kinzhal vs Pac-3 & IRIS-T: ua-cam.com/video/i0GzbajI0mU/v-deo.html
    F16 or Gripen for Ukraine?: ua-cam.com/video/Y-k71nfap4Q/v-deo.html
    Mig-31 vs NATO Black Sea AWACS: ua-cam.com/video/vFOzjW25ItI/v-deo.html
    R-37M Long Range Shootdown: ua-cam.com/video/-3LKGL4w9Q4/v-deo.html
    Drone Swarm vs NATO Defense: ua-cam.com/video/wDBOSd9qCDs/v-deo.html
    Patrio PAC-3/IRIS-T vs Missiles: ua-cam.com/video/N5Z81iW8YNY/v-deo.html
    MANPAD/IRIS-T vs Russian Missiles: ua-cam.com/video/N9R9GUVcTyk/v-deo.html
    AGM-158C LRASM vs Sevastopol: ua-cam.com/video/GDZoDRhIIRw/v-deo.html
    A-10s Operating in S-400 Nets: ua-cam.com/video/5BwFlesg42o/v-deo.html
    Modernized Su-27 vs Su-35: ua-cam.com/video/7llLDzeT2Bs/v-deo.html
    Modernized F15/F16 vs Su-35: ua-cam.com/video/-TozTHbAXVs/v-deo.html
    Can Su-57 Defend Russia From F-22/35: ua-cam.com/video/E-oC3NgxC94/v-deo.html
    IMPROVED Stealth vs Russian Bombers: ua-cam.com/video/IgwLW4YKvVU/v-deo.html
    Ukraine Using Hellfire Missile?: ua-cam.com/video/s_1YHDTmPPw/v-deo.html
    US Harpoons vs Russian Navy: ua-cam.com/video/Oiee83CWRcE/v-deo.html
    Ukraine Using APKWS?: ua-cam.com/video/FBxV9YuAfaw/v-deo.html
    Ukraine US HARMs vs Russian S-400: ua-cam.com/video/eSyEOXsjWo8/v-deo.html
    Patriot/NASAMS vs Supersonic Missiles: ua-cam.com/video/i1q7uDeinA4/v-deo.html
    Fulcrum/Flanker vs Foxbat/Super Flanker: ua-cam.com/video/BhXfxc94JAU/v-deo.html
    NASAMS vs Russian Cruise Missiles: ua-cam.com/video/pJI_b95jzpk/v-deo.html
    Russian KH-47M2 vs Polish Air Force: ua-cam.com/video/cnrVxqL5q9w/v-deo.html
    Su-27 & Drone vs Snake Island: ua-cam.com/video/T_oRoU2Ayfo/v-deo.html
    Su-25s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: ua-cam.com/video/ryV65bUJzrw/v-deo.html
    NATO Eurofighters vs Crimean AWACS: ua-cam.com/video/EiJ2dFRh95g/v-deo.html
    Patriot, Gepard & Gripen vs KH-65: ua-cam.com/video/ZhxdrNjig1g/v-deo.html
    A-10s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: ua-cam.com/video/B0tZoo0uLh4/v-deo.html
    USN Tomahawk Strike Kerch Bridge: ua-cam.com/video/0vpi8xBygV8/v-deo.html
    USAF Stealth Strike Kerch Bridge: ua-cam.com/video/IJbf9Bcxnw0/v-deo.html
    Ukrainian Jets Strike Kerch Bridge: ua-cam.com/video/I8FumuZReB4/v-deo.html
    F-22 Raptors vs Russian Fighters: ua-cam.com/video/ComRcmrwJWk/v-deo.html
    Raptor/Eagle vs Super Flanker: ua-cam.com/video/keqYmuSEo-8/v-deo.html
    USAF Bombers vs Mariupol Defenses: ua-cam.com/video/aCsboOG0QU4/v-deo.html
    Ukraine Bombs Snake Island: ua-cam.com/video/BX696MKdkb8/v-deo.html
    Stealth Fighters vs Russian Bombers: ua-cam.com/video/rym90jnQDsA/v-deo.html
    Sinking Of Moskva #3: ua-cam.com/video/NIjoyIieOzY/v-deo.html
    Sinking Of Moskva #2: ua-cam.com/video/snjfbj_EwW4/v-deo.html
    Sinking Of Moskva #1: ua-cam.com/video/Bxwh6MGLJNc/v-deo.html
    Russia Nukes Britain: ua-cam.com/video/rzk45RFQwA8/v-deo.html
    Ukraine Uses Danish F-16s: ua-cam.com/video/17Pikrp0QaY/v-deo.html
    Ukraine Uses Polish Mig-29s: ua-cam.com/video/zCi4tAIzuOU/v-deo.html
    Russian-Britain Missile Attack: ua-cam.com/video/zwIGfabvzHA/v-deo.html
    Ghost Of Kyiv: ua-cam.com/video/Yrct8V4n1-U/v-deo.html
    Belgorod Raid: ua-cam.com/video/mQykTxt6ftw/v-deo.html
    Eurofighter/Fulcrum vs Super Flanker: ua-cam.com/video/MPyIipEhgR0/v-deo.html
    US Strike vs Odessa ua-cam.com/video/KeiOHgzic6Y/v-deo.html
    Russian Helo Rocket Lob: ua-cam.com/video/118GgGnP_sM/v-deo.html
    Russian Su-25 vs US Patriot SAM: ua-cam.com/video/asp69ZD_tO0/v-deo.html
    Understanding Russian SAMs: ua-cam.com/video/R4xTxLNZXcw/v-deo.html
    Ukrainian Jets Road Operations: ua-cam.com/video/hBpzQhinPbw/v-deo.html
    Russian 40 Mile Convoy: ua-cam.com/video/Vr_-2FLblBk/v-deo.html
    Flanker vs Super Flanker: ua-cam.com/video/VOAuOFLJGk4/v-deo.html

    • @Zoddom
      @Zoddom 22 дні тому

      Is there a modlist with download links for some of these?

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  21 день тому

      @@Zoddom In vid description a few lines down.

    • @willfarrow6947
      @willfarrow6947 21 день тому

      @@grimreaperslove the videos, they make my week!
      Will you guys be at fairford again this year??

    • @ShootBlueHelmets
      @ShootBlueHelmets 21 день тому

      Super Cap, et al. HELP. Not just myself, but the West. There are videos pertaining to things I have been working on that need to become reality. I saw the link to the CH site and have no response yet. I know he is busy, but I don't have a proper computer to play DCS now, let alone know how to mod it, and this is urgent. Real-life possibilities and the saving of lives. Some videos are out there, which are close to stumbling on my thoughts. I do not want to give it all away in public, but let me say that everything involved is already in your inventory, and it just needs a little cut here and there, and we will have something that will not only draw new and old fans with awe, but possibly influence the movers and shakers to make it happen. Reloading missiles at sea? Capacity? Worry no more. Imagine a machine that can defend a fleet with AT least 1,600 various instruments of defense and offense. About 2/3 defense and 1/3 in strike packages? Something impenetrable and lethal. A predator worth over a dozen Aegis class vessels.
      How can I reach one of you? Any of you? I tried to reach Hollings to make an animation, but I think it would come to life better in DCS. Let's do something that can make a difference in real life!

    • @ShootBlueHelmets
      @ShootBlueHelmets 19 днів тому

      @@grimreapers ^

  • @Pre613
    @Pre613 22 дні тому +216

    Get ready for a visit from another US Intelligence Agency. They’ll be wondering where you got your information again.

    • @ajstyles5704
      @ajstyles5704 22 дні тому +23

      It's DCS, all Russian models are inaccurate, otherwise the DCS developers would wake up one morning in a Russian interrogation room.
      Also, its DCS, where everything is just bits on data, all their missiles, systems and aircrafts are in top condition.

    • @henria.277
      @henria.277 22 дні тому +8

      It's just a S-200 with updated S-300 radars and guidance.
      Why look elsewhere? If it was remotely US made russia would have gone ballistics on the news.

    • @dextermorgan1
      @dextermorgan1 22 дні тому +2

      Did that happen previously?

    • @michaeldenesyk3195
      @michaeldenesyk3195 22 дні тому +3

      The US Intelligence agencies would not waste their time on a bunch of amateurs who have no grasp on weapon systems or their correct applications.

    • @thierryk5381
      @thierryk5381 22 дні тому

      So the usa intelligence agencies thibk they are the owner of intelligence? As human beings we are intelligent...they can kick rocks

  • @dreaminknight
    @dreaminknight 22 дні тому +43

    No way. The AIM 260 is still not available for general use even within the USAF. I guess the Ukrainian AF will get some AIM-120C7 in the best case but not even the AIM120D.

    • @oliverlee1998
      @oliverlee1998 22 дні тому +5

      why not give it a test in a real theatre?

    • @phiality9070
      @phiality9070 22 дні тому +2

      some F15s flew with 260s in the 10s

    • @Dirtyharry70585
      @Dirtyharry70585 22 дні тому +2

      @@oliverlee1998f22’s getting mechanical internal Bay upgrades for those 260s then it’s planned for 35s and planned for f15 cause they can hold them on wing points

    • @chrisk_nfl4120
      @chrisk_nfl4120 22 дні тому +1

      It's not a recreation, they were having some fun and trying to see if the concept is legit

    • @patricktho6546
      @patricktho6546 22 дні тому

      This is though how you would introduce a new weapon

  • @marcppparis
    @marcppparis 22 дні тому +95

    Fun speculation but US would never risk the AIM 260 falling into Russian hands

    • @marcppparis
      @marcppparis 22 дні тому +11

      Or gaining performance info from being shot at with it given the limited gain of a single plane possibly shot down

    • @dreaminknight
      @dreaminknight 22 дні тому +22

      Only the most trusted and capable allies are getting the AIM-120D. So the Ukraine AF getting the AIM 260 is - with due respect - less realistic.
      Btw initially planed launching platforms of the 260 are the F-22, F-35A/B/C and the,F-18E/F. The F-15EX will get certified later. Thus currently no word on the F-16C, F-15C/D/E yet.
      And surely not any Mig29 or SU27 or SU24 etc.

    • @override367
      @override367 22 дні тому +9

      the only way AIM 260 is used this fight is some secret squirrel F-22 launch over the sea of Azov where there's a very high confidence that the target will get killed and the debris will be in the drink

    • @jonathanbuzzard1376
      @jonathanbuzzard1376 22 дні тому +17

      One suspects a Meteor would be more likely than an AIM-260. Firstly it is fully operational and secondly the UK have been known to give missiles to Ukraine and not announce them. The range is only listed as significantly more than 200km so potentially a possible shot. Though I feel modified S200 is far more likely.

    • @smithnwesson990
      @smithnwesson990 22 дні тому

      It was likely a Patriot. They still have a few of them and they do have the range to hit it. Unfortunately people still don't understand Ukraine would need 10 times their inventory of every weapon system to have a real chance to beat Russia back. US simply doesn't produce enough weapons or munitions anymore. Big mistake killing the arms industry

  • @HT-Blindleader
    @HT-Blindleader 22 дні тому +18

    I see Drop has read my comments and taken it upon himself to increase explosions on takeoff and landings. Good man!!

  • @galaxy11plays
    @galaxy11plays 22 дні тому +5

    strider needed his own cockpit scene at the end, where he looks over to his radar screen then at a picture of someone back home, then back to the radar then back at the picture...then up at the HUD as he takes a deep breath muttering "i love you" then vectors on the SU35 ...2 missiles miss and he shouts "im too close, switching to guns" BOOM... TOTAL HERO!

  • @hanrockabrand95
    @hanrockabrand95 22 дні тому +10

    16:51 I agree. I think 4th gen is still something to be reckoned with, especially if fielded in numbers and supported by advanced radars.

    • @ShootBlueHelmets
      @ShootBlueHelmets 19 днів тому +1

      Yes, the data and sensor links from AWACS and F-35s will guide the missiles that gen 4 will launch. They will probably hang back just a little and go defensive right after launch.

    • @cameronspence4977
      @cameronspence4977 15 днів тому +1

      The US and European 4 gen Jets are still better than anything china or russia has except maybe the J20 and Su35

  • @DR-jq9bg
    @DR-jq9bg 22 дні тому +3

    Another great experiment! Awesome flying boys!

  • @albird87
    @albird87 22 дні тому +10

    Finally! Someone that's not me crashing from road takeoffs! haha Love you Drop!

    • @simba1113
      @simba1113 21 день тому +2

      but no one does it as well as you do.

    • @DripsDrop
      @DripsDrop 21 день тому +3

      Just missed you bird 😢

    • @albird87
      @albird87 21 день тому +1

      @@DripsDrop I miss you to drop 🥲

  • @VincentNajger1
    @VincentNajger1 22 дні тому +3

    Personally, i think it was an accidental friendly fire incident. When I first saw a drawing of mig 29 in a warplanes book as a kid in the late 80s, I thought it just looked mean and sexy and fast. Its been my fav soviet era plane forever.

  • @shveylien7401
    @shveylien7401 22 дні тому +13

    1980's F14D's AN/APG-71 upgraded AWG-9 radar was designed for 300+km bomber detection. Limited by retrofitting the limited nose antenna to the otherwise 700+km capable radar system.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  21 день тому +3

      That is detection, could it actually track a target at that range?

    • @joshuaanderson4090
      @joshuaanderson4090 20 днів тому

      As cap said detection is one thing. A missile that can be guided that far against a moving target is a much more modern thing.

  • @SamMurphyHSV
    @SamMurphyHSV 22 дні тому +1

    I am loving the random air to air anti-ship missiles. Very grim reaper esque lol.

  • @John_SlideRule_Bullay
    @John_SlideRule_Bullay 22 дні тому +5

    Getting closer to getting up into the DCS air! Fun mission as always, especially with the take-off drills LOL! Video Valued by Valued Viewer - Fly Army! 🚁

  • @R.Instro
    @R.Instro 21 день тому +1

    Liked for that flawless take off sequence. Thank you for making it look so very, very easy. 💟

  • @wolfgangamadeus1246
    @wolfgangamadeus1246 22 дні тому +3

    Thank you Cap, excellent episode. I really enjoy your scenarios that are topical to the current news cycle.

  • @sammysmirh3889
    @sammysmirh3889 21 день тому

    Another great video Cap

  • @Ecobomb
    @Ecobomb 22 дні тому +7

    I Love the inclusion of outtakes, its endearing.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  21 день тому +2

      Plenty of blooper material to work with in GR.

    • @TabTa6
      @TabTa6 21 день тому +1

      @@grimreapers team effort, right? 😉

  • @TheVillageIdiotUk
    @TheVillageIdiotUk 22 дні тому +1

    Very impressive flying, chaps. Plenty of suspense and a lot of fun.

  • @Nealetony
    @Nealetony 22 дні тому +5

    The APG-77 has an incredibly fast scan time across its 120 degree field of view and could detect aircraft from over 320 mi (515 km) away. The AN/APG-77 system itself exhibits a very low radar cross-section, supporting the F-22's stealthy design. The upgraded APG-77(V)1 may have an even greater range.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  21 день тому +2

      Agreed BUT could it Track targets at those ranges.

    • @Nealetony
      @Nealetony 21 день тому +2

      @grimreapers look like if it's non stealth, then yes

  • @CreepingTerror
    @CreepingTerror 22 дні тому +1

    That battle at the end was great!

  • @aydincakiroglu1665
    @aydincakiroglu1665 22 дні тому +39

    They probably used modified s-200 with extended range. There is no way they use aım-260.

    • @hanrockabrand95
      @hanrockabrand95 22 дні тому +12

      Is it so unthinkable that the US might send one or two as "an equipment test" while congress was slow walking the aid package?

    • @GlitchNectar
      @GlitchNectar 22 дні тому +10

      @@hanrockabrand95not unthinkable but very troubling politically and technologically if it lands and is identified/captured

    • @hanrockabrand95
      @hanrockabrand95 22 дні тому +6

      @GlitchNectar Captured intact? 💯 agreed. That would be awful. But I'm imagining some CIA spook doing something off-book with just one or two missiles, and it would be something where they keep track of it every step of the way. I know missiles have the ability to self-destruct if they lose lock, so a remote kill switch in case of suspected compromise sounds plausible. But the risk/reward ratio for the whole operation is questionable.

    • @TimInertiatic
      @TimInertiatic 22 дні тому +1

      Could a manpad reach it?
      Probably more likely a drunken/scared ruskie AA operator. They've got form

    • @ser43_OLDC
      @ser43_OLDC 22 дні тому +3

      The bomber is 500km from the line of the front. Even the s500 couldn't have reach out the bomber, and if it was a missile the bomber wouldn't have had a enigine fire

  • @mortoopz
    @mortoopz 22 дні тому +4

    I'd love to see what would really happen to a jet if, on takeoff, the guy in front lit their afterburner that close.

    • @simba1113
      @simba1113 21 день тому +1

      oh pain would melt radomes would probably suffer some weakening. and possible ground stall the engines of the jets behind in line.

    • @TabTa6
      @TabTa6 21 день тому

      ​@@simba1113 simba talkin like he SEEN it before 😮😂

  • @karlstathakis7786
    @karlstathakis7786 22 дні тому +2

    got a 2-for-1 special on the GR takeoff, today was a good day

  • @jyralnadreth4442
    @jyralnadreth4442 22 дні тому +40

    Ukraine hit it with a Photon Torpedo 🤣

    • @RazorsharpLT
      @RazorsharpLT 22 дні тому +5

      Dunno what point you're trying to make, but the plane clearly got hit from the video.
      So it's either Russian incompetence or Ukrainian competence. Your choice!
      🤡

    • @StephenTSchuler
      @StephenTSchuler 22 дні тому +4

      ​@RazorsharpLT I think his point is Romulan time travelers gave them the tech and that's gonna be a problem for the temporal prime directive.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 22 дні тому +2

      most likely it was hit by a bout of bad maintenance, these big variable geometry supersonic bombers are mechanically unreliable at the best of times.

    • @speen9430
      @speen9430 22 дні тому

      @@RazorsharpLT Bird strike caused an engine fire, pilots ejected which sent the plane into a spin

    • @RazorsharpLT
      @RazorsharpLT 21 день тому

      @@speen9430 Oh, did the bird strike cause half of the plane to fucking explode and lose it's wing too?
      Damn, it's almost as if these planes are... made to be bird proof.

  • @JohnSmith-cb6qx
    @JohnSmith-cb6qx 22 дні тому +2

    8:40 Hope those boys have ear protection

  • @bassett_green
    @bassett_green 22 дні тому

    Really strong teamwork in the fight

  • @thr8061
    @thr8061 22 дні тому +9

    I have seen/heard various sources that some AIM260s have already been used. As well as some F-117s are still flying missions!

    • @crowe6961
      @crowe6961 22 дні тому +8

      Seems like the F-117s might be being used to introduce pilots to how stealth tech screws with radar in practice, during training.

    • @BoraHorzaGobuchul
      @BoraHorzaGobuchul 22 дні тому +5

      The f-117 is crazy. Still remember flying it in the sim in the 90ies, back when Russia was free and noone sane would ever believe if I told them it would turn into Mordor...

    • @thr8061
      @thr8061 21 день тому +1

      @@crowe6961 I saw they will be used thru "at least" 2034.

    • @innelator6941
      @innelator6941 17 днів тому

      @@BoraHorzaGobuchul90s-free Russia
      Bruh, stu moron, it was literally one of the worst times for Russia

  • @AdalbertSchneider_
    @AdalbertSchneider_ 22 дні тому +5

    6:30 just today I aknowledged, that the S-200 "Vega" ( the version UA has ) was able to to guide the missile at even 450km, but the missile itself is 250km range, officialy, 300km max., by other sources 285km... so yeah, if we are talking about the older radars that are known, they could see it coming. Not to mention they have now new modern radars which parameters are classified, so... Yeah, I wouldnt wonder if they are pretty comfortable to see these kind of "cows with wings" how they are joking about everything bigger than Flanker, at about 500km.

    • @miriamweller812
      @miriamweller812 16 днів тому

      Child, the range is limited by the fuel. Get out of your videogame. You can't fool reality.

    • @AdalbertSchneider_
      @AdalbertSchneider_ 16 днів тому

      are you retarded ?
      @@miriamweller812

  • @Spirit986
    @Spirit986 21 день тому

    @19:13 the chronometer reads (from left to right): Flight time, Time, Stopwatch

  • @MTBScotland
    @MTBScotland 22 дні тому +4

    Ukraine have shown a video of the operators apparently firing the missile etc APG-77 and APG-81 have a massive range that would be able to detect a backfire from 360km

    • @jameson1239
      @jameson1239 18 днів тому +1

      Yes but Ukraine doesn’t have F-35s or F-22s

    • @MTBScotland
      @MTBScotland 18 днів тому

      @@jameson1239 Cap asked if any radars had that range. Nothing to do with Ukraine.

  • @robertvantine2810
    @robertvantine2810 21 день тому

    Simba is definitely getting some compensation for all the practice server shout outs...

  • @jmtpolitico80
    @jmtpolitico80 21 день тому

    I do have to say what a amazing video, and absolutely GREAT FLYING!!! Big time! And it is not as shocking to me. You guys have gotten Really Really good at working together all as a team. You all know what each other are thinking, so you anticipate a lot! And that is the Sign as GREAT TEAM WORK, WITH A GREAT LEADER! The leader of any team or unit doesn't have to be the best at everything or anything for that matter! But the TEAM LEADER needs to know how to put the best team together, and be able to get each team member to work together! As One! Like a WOLF PACK! And then you have your Alfa! The Alfa puts the team together and keeps them together, all working together! And I just shared this video on my Public Platforms and SAID BEST DCS TEAM IN DCS!!! I started watching about 1.5 years ago, and in the last year I have seen the Improvement, but not like the last 3-6 Months! You CAP and THE TEAM OF GR have grown as a Team faster and become able to Work together as a TEAM like I have really never seen before. The TEAM has been on Fire! And I hate singling anyone out, but I have to give some good Credit to SIMBA! Guy is what I think one of the Best Pilots in DCS, if not THE BEST?!?!? But not only that he has help you get this TEAM to work as ONE TEAM! Not just everyone out for themselves and do what they want. You have the best TEAM on DCS! And to the TEAM, I 100% Believe you are very close to becoming the Best DCS TEAM out there. So congrats to the entire TEAM for acting like one!
    Then while I was writing this I was wondering if there was any way you guys could get some kinda Team Tournament Game going like I watched you be the Moderator to one. They were Team BVR fights both having the exact same Jets with the Same weapons on the F-16. I would love to see you guys compete in some. Or even some competitions here and there between just the GR TEAM. I know you have done that, but I don't think with the same exact equal jets! So I just figured I would throw it out there, I would find it interesting. Plus it's always good Practice! THANKS TEAM GR FOR A GREAT VIDEO!!!!

  • @BrentLeVasseur
    @BrentLeVasseur 21 день тому +2

    I’m fairly certain that the Aim 54C Phoenix missile that used to be carried on F-14 Tomcats in the 1980s could do that too.

    • @simba1113
      @simba1113 21 день тому

      I believe the official longest verified shot was only 117 miles if memory serves.

    • @TabTa6
      @TabTa6 21 день тому +1

      54c only rated to 184km not 300

    • @BrentLeVasseur
      @BrentLeVasseur 21 день тому

      @@TabTa6 What its rated for and its max distance are two different things, no?

    • @BrentLeVasseur
      @BrentLeVasseur 21 день тому +2

      @@TabTa6 Ok I did some research and 100nm is the publicly stated range, while the actual range for the missile is still classified, which says to me that the actual max range is much greater than the stated range. And as a side-note, I find it ironic in the extreme that the official max range for this missile has remained classified to this day, despite the fact that Iran is the only country that is still employing the use of the F-14 Tomcat and the Phoenix missile! You would think they would release that information now since it is already in the hands of our enemies.

    • @TabTa6
      @TabTa6 21 день тому +1

      @@BrentLeVasseur sure but 50% farther?

  • @ftumptch86
    @ftumptch86 22 дні тому +1

    I wonder if they have assets closer in or maybe some kind of drone sub carrying AA? They seem to be achieving some odd kills.

  • @prichardgs
    @prichardgs 22 дні тому +1

    That was GREAT!!!!!

  • @MattSherridan_29
    @MattSherridan_29 19 днів тому

    Cap, how do you manage to set the FARP up so that you and your wonderful humans are able to take off from a road in that area of the map? I don't know if I have an outdated map version (running most up to date version of DCS), but all I have in that part of the map is an open empty field. You're a wizard! Love the video, keep up the excellent work

  • @MAYDAYSIMULATIONS
    @MAYDAYSIMULATIONS 22 дні тому +1

    Very cool👌

  • @markscion
    @markscion 22 дні тому +4

    How on earth did you manage to lose a RN ship? the King will not be amused!

    • @JoeMitchell2
      @JoeMitchell2 2 дні тому

      This! Justice for the HMS Ariadne!

  • @RuiWang-zm2ue
    @RuiWang-zm2ue 20 днів тому +4

    Yes, can confirm that it was a US made AIM-260 missile. My personal psychic on retainer saw it in her crystal ball.

  • @nosip
    @nosip 22 дні тому +1

    Cap and crew. Have you ever considered doing a dynamic campaign with D&D DM? Like create your character in the 90s world, and the D20 rolls would ascertain armaments fuel and even jet allocation. Then, load into DCS where the DM has created a scenario for you to survive?

    • @simba1113
      @simba1113 21 день тому

      some how I would end up with the flying boat.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  21 день тому

      I'd love that kind of things, but who is going to want to watch it?

    • @nosip
      @nosip 21 день тому

      It could be a side channel for the D&D section. Main channel for the flight?
      I'm happy to brainstorm with any of your leaders

  • @saturnvmoon8592
    @saturnvmoon8592 22 дні тому

    i think meteor against a large bomber could reach out a similar distance under perfect launch chacteristics
    also modern radars are likley to be able to detect a bomber sized target at those kind of ranges

  • @sp00f64
    @sp00f64 22 дні тому

    Good point on 4th Gen tech as a "world standard", and still applies, especially if they continue to upgrade them anywhere they can. 5th gen is great in their role, but 4th gen still kicks ass too.

  • @ru5h7
    @ru5h7 13 днів тому

    they did it presumably with S200 linked to Patriot and/ or Iris T System so called FrankenSAM

  • @jetfighter200
    @jetfighter200 22 дні тому +13

    It was not even a "shot down" it was a technical malfunction..and the Tu-22 crashed 600km from the black sea away... also there were no shrapnel damage at the crashed wreck

    • @david7384
      @david7384 19 днів тому +1

      stop saying real facts!,!

    • @ObiWanShinobi917
      @ObiWanShinobi917 19 днів тому +1

      Is that what Russian media told you?
      Coping hard I see

  • @Texas240
    @Texas240 22 дні тому +3

    The US always has an AWACS over the Black Sea. The AIM 120 is data link capable (an aircraft can lock and fire on a target provided by the AWACS without the launching aircraft having radar active). The AIM 260 would also have that capability. There would need to be some cockpit addon to integrate the data link and missile targeting system. Not impossible.
    They could probably whip up a data link capability between patriot radar or command vehicle and the AIM 260. It would make sense since AIM 260 might eventually be used in a ground to air system, like the NASAM using AIM 120

    • @darkassassin4166
      @darkassassin4166 21 день тому +2

      Bro it aint even in service

    • @Texas240
      @Texas240 21 день тому

      @@darkassassin4166 Bro, things get tested before they enter service. Ukraine has basically been a war college and equipment testing ground.

    • @darkassassin4166
      @darkassassin4166 21 день тому +1

      @@Texas240 oh yes because the americans would want to risk the aim-260 falling into russian hands and getting reverse engineered

    • @Texas240
      @Texas240 21 день тому

      @@darkassassin4166 - So, by your logic, neither the Americans nor any US weapons customers would ever fire an AIM 260 at a Russian jet...
      Makes sense. Maybe it's designed for use against Houthi jets.

    • @darkassassin4166
      @darkassassin4166 20 днів тому

      @@Texas240 If it ain't in service it can't be fired it was most likely an upgraded S200 site that downed the TU-22

  • @kenc9236
    @kenc9236 22 дні тому

    The clouds- "The Simpsons." lol

  • @kkrolik2106
    @kkrolik2106 17 днів тому

    Poland deliver quite number of different AA system Including Modernised S-200C Wega that theoretically can reach this target

  • @JLH111176
    @JLH111176 22 дні тому +2

    I would think no way USA would risk the technology of that missile getting stolen

  • @raph151515
    @raph151515 22 дні тому +1

    some awacs models have a radar that can range to more than 300km

  • @Cesar-jh1ho
    @Cesar-jh1ho 22 дні тому +2

    The 2 main theories are that it was hit and was leaping to a air base before it went down and the other which has more credibility is that russia shot its own bomber which there is a track record of them doing friendly fire with trigger happy low experience AA operators

    • @henria.277
      @henria.277 22 дні тому +1

      There is absolutely 0 chance for friendly fire, there is no way to mistake it for something else on radar and friend or foe must have been on.
      UA took out multiple radars in crimea to bait the A-50 closer to the frontline for RU to retain full radar coverage, it was in range and got shot out of the sky, end of the story.
      I will add that there is no such thing as an inexperienced AA operator in russia, it is considered one of the most vital role and they suffer very low attrition.

    • @deanwilliams433
      @deanwilliams433 19 днів тому +2

      The other one is that the Tu-22 is an old airframe and had many issues. As these old planes get more flight hours some will not make it back.

    • @Pahanrost
      @Pahanrost 13 днів тому

      Есть много видео о том что ту-22м3 летел с пожаром двигателя, без внешних повреждений.

  • @sampanyofella5832
    @sampanyofella5832 22 дні тому +1

    Ukraine took a few oil rigs in the black sea a few months ago. No clue where though!. I wonder if they were used as a platform or something - who knows, clearly least of all me!. Fantastic content as always gr!

  • @XAirForce
    @XAirForce 22 дні тому +1

    Eagle dynamics should add Arma three and drones into the game.

  • @NemoGraynameA8
    @NemoGraynameA8 22 дні тому +1

    If we sre doing weird missile stuff then you should do the air launched Patriot.

  • @nonegiven5295
    @nonegiven5295 21 день тому

    Why didn't you go after the cruise missiles? Where did they hit? Did they achieve their objective? As always a nice video. Thank you and keep up the good work.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  21 день тому

      It was a fake cruise missile, actually hit a hidden ship in the Sea. Wasn't really part of the roleplay todaty.

  • @justkevinlol
    @justkevinlol 21 день тому

    Aerial combat is somehow turning into a game of American Football/Rugby now

  • @kerrybullock4554
    @kerrybullock4554 22 дні тому

    I come for the flying, I stay for the banter and

  • @dethkultbadger
    @dethkultbadger 22 дні тому +5

    Media stated it was a s300

  • @lewistrickett9094
    @lewistrickett9094 22 дні тому +1

    Hey cap’ with the news about Argentina getting those 26 F16s, you should do a video about how the flight of typhoons based in the falklands would fair against them if attacked.

    • @harryspeakup8452
      @harryspeakup8452 22 дні тому +1

      They already did it: look back through the uploads to 23 November 2023

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  21 день тому +1

      Trying to think of something new to do with that, that we havn't done before.

    • @lewistrickett9094
      @lewistrickett9094 21 день тому

      @@harryspeakup8452 i get they did the Falklands but now they can do it as if real, the real amount of F16s and typhoons also weapons.

  • @jameswhiting7113
    @jameswhiting7113 22 дні тому +1

    Cap: we are to good at this...
    Me: taking off in this mission...landing on Jersey in the last 😂😂

  • @zacharyamann2194
    @zacharyamann2194 22 дні тому +3

    Hi Cap big fan here, wargame idea what if the US withdrew into isolationism, could the Japanese self denfense force defend mainland Japan from a full scale Chinese naval attack using only their air assets and sam network without any help from the US

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  21 день тому +1

      Literally doing this now :)

  • @tomriley5790
    @tomriley5790 22 дні тому +1

    They claimed it was an SA-5, S200 the US wasnt providing them with anything fancy at the time.

  • @kalmansovari6878
    @kalmansovari6878 19 днів тому

    It might have been hit closer and just limped back quite a bit.

  • @stefanoromei1094
    @stefanoromei1094 21 день тому

    i suppose friendly fire or a simple malfunction....the backfireS are very very old planes

  • @LearningAstrophotography-jj9en
    @LearningAstrophotography-jj9en 22 дні тому +1

    6000 mtrs is near as damn it, 20000 ft

  • @mrlodwick
    @mrlodwick 22 дні тому +1

    That flat spin on the vid was cruel.

  • @Scooter_McLuvin
    @Scooter_McLuvin 22 дні тому +101

    Isn't it crazy how bad the Russian military is actually performing in Ukraine? The Ruskies thought it would be a walk in the park.

    • @glovemaker2
      @glovemaker2 22 дні тому +10

      Lol nazi had thought they were in Crimea summer 23

    • @cursed_cat28
      @cursed_cat28 22 дні тому +40

      @@glovemaker2 that english is so bad i can't figure out whether ur pro ukraine or pro russia

    • @MH-je3ht
      @MH-je3ht 22 дні тому +8

      All the western support of ukraine and you expect Russia would easily crush ukronazis ?

    • @cameroncarley7958
      @cameroncarley7958 22 дні тому

      @@MH-je3htI see trust argument made constant and I don’t understand it, because the Russians had at least a month, if not more, of delayed NATO and other allied reactions. A nation such as Russia, which presents its self as a first rate power should have at least regional dominance in Eastern Europe, especially with a nation literally on their boarder, but they were unable to successfully subdue Ukraine in the timespan before NATO support arrived. Hell it was even more time before significant contributions of weapons arrived. Would Ukraine have lasted this long without western support, no, but is Russias inability to successfully invade a nation on their doorstep (when they claim to be a first rate military power with at least European dominance) in the timespan before significant western support arrived an embarrassment, most definitely.

    • @victorscolari7519
      @victorscolari7519 22 дні тому +31

      @@MH-je3hti mean, yeah? They couldn’t even take air superiority at the start of the war lmao

  • @user81069
    @user81069 22 дні тому

    I see many possibilities.
    Submarine launched surface to air missile.
    Stealth aircraft launched and then guided by AWACS or even satellite.

  • @user-xw4lk2rx6d
    @user-xw4lk2rx6d 22 дні тому

    I would think the more likely reality is Friendly fire from the SA or bad IFF.

  • @16tdgolf
    @16tdgolf 22 дні тому +1

    f-14 tomcat maximum stand off interception is 314km

  • @dzzope
    @dzzope 22 дні тому

    Wanna see a Hybrid of the 260 with meteor for the second stage.

  • @jdogdarkness
    @jdogdarkness 22 дні тому +1

    I think its HIGHLY unlikely that US sent AIM-260. For the most part, the only stuff US has been willing to part with is borderline obsolete (by US standards) equipment. And the cases that break that, they send last Gen variants. PAC-3MSE is the only modern high end thing US has sent. But the core of the system(the radar & fire control suite) are a few gens back. What's more, they wouldn't want AIM-260 fired into Russian territory for fear of it being recovered & studied.

    • @LondonSteveLee
      @LondonSteveLee 21 день тому

      China and Russia probably already have something better to reverse-engineer (Meteor) after idiot Biden pushed Saudi Arabia into the arms of China.

  • @dat_sauce_tho2194
    @dat_sauce_tho2194 22 дні тому +1

    Aoa rolls are wild

  • @first--class
    @first--class 10 днів тому

    sometimes its good to not explain every single move we make

  • @stuartholden2772
    @stuartholden2772 22 дні тому +1

    That's literally the worst nightmare for any enemy, give Su-27 with AIM-260 imagine a meteor AAM

  • @LeonAust
    @LeonAust 22 дні тому +2

    Currently Australian RAAF E-7 (Boeing 737) AWACs are flying the currant NATO Ukraine perimeters and the E-7 are one of the worlds best AWACs far surpassing the current NATO E-3 that even the US is purchasing this aircraft in the future.
    With AESA Phased Array and a very modern Network centric capability into the US command structure I wonder if it was used in the targeting node.

    • @Utubesuperstar
      @Utubesuperstar 22 дні тому

      The 7 is a brilliant platform, incredible technology. I definitely think it’s giving info and potentially guiding weapons as you said it absolutely has the fidelity to do so

  • @3pAcsJs
    @3pAcsJs 22 дні тому

    i mean this would be perfect for testing a new missle lol

  • @davidelliott5843
    @davidelliott5843 4 дні тому

    A drone carrying ManPads could do the damage. But getting it in place for long enough is another matter.

  • @GAULOU67
    @GAULOU67 22 дні тому +1

    They actually said the kill was made via a modified S200

  • @xKaaDo
    @xKaaDo 22 дні тому +4

    SU-34 rains FAB-1500 on the front line but what gets shot down is 300+ km ( said to be 450+ km) bomber ?? doesn't make sense tbh

    • @cockatoo010
      @cockatoo010 22 дні тому

      Su-34s are also getting shot down tbf.
      and those Tu-22Ms do launch cruise missiles against cities inUkraine. whenever you see a russian missile attack onto cities west of the front, they come from Tu-95s, Tu-160s MiG 31s and, of course, Tu-22Ms

    • @roli4040
      @roli4040 22 дні тому

      They come in just above treetops and only get up to necessary altitude to drop the FAB's the very last moment. Hard to detect them

    • @ser43_OLDC
      @ser43_OLDC 22 дні тому

      @@cockatoo010 Since the russians started targeting SAM sites with Tornado-S MLRS and Iskanders, any su34 or 24 has been shoot down in a month

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  21 день тому +1

      Possibly Su-34 is not considered a High Value Target? Reserved for AWACS and Strategic bombers?

    • @koskok2965
      @koskok2965 13 днів тому

      @@roli4040 Are you high? Even is yes, Su-34s fly even higher than you. You've obviously not even seen 1 of the dozens of Russian clips featuring Su-34 pairs releasing quadruplets of UMPK fitted FAB-500 and FAB-1500 from above the clouds.

  • @jamesricker3997
    @jamesricker3997 22 дні тому +1

    They could have launched a S-200 from an aircraft and used the ground based radar for targeting

  • @AbstractObserver
    @AbstractObserver 22 дні тому

    Why your mig is beeping?

  • @tanksoldier
    @tanksoldier 22 дні тому

    More likely they used an old Phoenix with upgraded avionics.

  • @totalNERD-eo7wx
    @totalNERD-eo7wx 21 день тому

    Here is an idea for GR:
    While we wait for the Kola Peninsula map, could you do a wargame involving Russian, Norway, and potentially Finland and Sweden using the South Atlantic map? We could have the southern tip of Chile be Northern Norway, with the Southwestern coast of Chile being the west coast of Norway and the Southeasternmost point of Argentina being Russia

    • @totalNERD-eo7wx
      @totalNERD-eo7wx 21 день тому

      As an add on: the mouth of Kola bay where Severomorsk is can be roughly equated to the location of "Cmte. Portillo" in Argentina

  • @hughmungus2760
    @hughmungus2760 22 дні тому

    my question is how would a cutting edge missile which nobody has an unclassified photo of be compatible with obsolete soviet era airframes or at best some F16s from the 1980s.
    How would ukraine even be able to track a bomber 300km out with their ancient FCR on their fighters.

  • @Marinealver
    @Marinealver 20 днів тому +1

    Could it be an AIM-54?

  • @Duckfisher0222
    @Duckfisher0222 17 днів тому

    This may sound crazy, but what about a HARMS?

  • @MRAWESOME22
    @MRAWESOME22 21 день тому

    @grimreapers Holy moly that constant double beeping tone is obnoxious. I had to fast forward during the non-combat section. If possible, would you please turn it off during ferry/non combat next time?

  • @nicolaspeigne1429
    @nicolaspeigne1429 21 день тому

    Ukraine said the Tu 22 was on its way back to base after launching his missiles when they got him, so an even more extreme shot than the one simulated there

  • @skipperg4436
    @skipperg4436 16 днів тому

    It must be something launched on top of S-200 missile. Judging by the fact that it doesn't do much damage to the target this "something" have a small warhead and judging by AWACS downing video this warhead have IR-guidance.
    So... sounds like some regular A2A missiles riding on top of S-200 with combined guidance system (radar-guided initially, IR-guided on terminal phase).
    Which is exactly what Ukrainians said: new weapon made of parts of old weapons.

  • @DARKKNIGHT-oj3ru
    @DARKKNIGHT-oj3ru 18 днів тому

    PAC-4 Skyceptor has range of 350km

  • @starmen.
    @starmen. 19 днів тому

    Ukraine don't have a launch platform for AIM-s, Soviet fighters are incompatible with US air-to-air missiles,
    but they can use a AGM-88 from a Su-27 or Mig-29 , TU-22 have radar so in theory AGM-88 can kill anything with a working radar .

  • @Kevin-hb7yq
    @Kevin-hb7yq 22 дні тому +1

    Successful on the first try!!

  • @gishjalmr5628
    @gishjalmr5628 13 днів тому

    I highly doubt the AIM-260 scenario. Classification would not allow the missiles to be transferred.

  • @whousley
    @whousley 22 дні тому +1

    I remind that Zelinsky claims to have a Sea Baby drone that carries and fires a SAM. Could that have killed the Backfire?

    • @TabTa6
      @TabTa6 21 день тому

      maybe but idk if a little boat is a good launch pad

  • @terryferry8799
    @terryferry8799 22 дні тому +1

    How can you remove the radar without changing the CG?

    • @harryspeakup8452
      @harryspeakup8452 22 дні тому

      By taking some other piece of equipment off the back end

    • @simba1113
      @simba1113 21 день тому +1

      you would change the CG but also you would place weight in the aircraft to give it a control able CG,

  • @jimboAndersenReviews
    @jimboAndersenReviews 21 день тому

    Very entertaining. I might have to eat a pizza; I planned to eat that pizza in advance.

  • @jyralnadreth4442
    @jyralnadreth4442 22 дні тому +1

    23:00 Who fired the Sea Cat??? lol Whats a Royal Navy Leander HMS Ariadne doing there?...she was sunk in 2004 as a hulk by Chile lol I suspect its how Cap got the TU-22 to fire its missiles lol

    • @TimInertiatic
      @TimInertiatic 22 дні тому

      I did wonder what that was all about...

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  21 день тому

      lol yeh I had to hide a blue ship in there to get the Tu-22 missiles to fire. You weren't supposed to see that.

  • @dennisvandermarkt8263
    @dennisvandermarkt8263 22 дні тому +1

    Cap loves the grass

  • @mortoopz
    @mortoopz 22 дні тому +1

    Did you not put the protagonist missile on a Mig31 because Ukraine don't have them?

  • @DracoSen21
    @DracoSen21 21 день тому

    So the MiG 29 was up and intercepted the TU-22 before it reached its target and fired?

    • @jetfighter200
      @jetfighter200 20 днів тому

      No the Tu 22 crashed in russia 600km from the claimed "shot down" are in the black sea