@@sngamer111 you probably haven't played Manhunt 2, because in the game you have to insert every shell to fully charge (8rd). The same with revolver, every round.
Well, that depends on which character you are playing with, if you play with Arthur, it's 15 years, but if you are playing with John, it will be only 7 years before the war breaks out
@@Goldrunner1169 compared to the difference between the characters’ years I’d say it’s a lot more tame. Either way it doesn’t make to much of a difference on the weapon selection as they’re a lot different with the either war. whether it be during the start or end of the war you still have a lot of things that are similar and different to the time period in rdr2. The only difference being the number of weapons, vehicles and other machines.
@@ghosttoast8610 He's not, because there are no blue or orange icons on the minimap, the horse icon has a saddle on it, and it looks like he's wearing the legend of the east outfit
@@mpirenews he has the navy revolver which he pulls out at the dynamite segment of the video this means hes either playing online or modding single player
Yeah, the SAA animation comparison was interesting especially. Like as flashy as BF1’s animations are, you actually see him using the ejector rod, which you don’t in RDR2
And the sounds of the gunshots echoing through the wind is incredibly accurate, notice how all the gunshots and echoes sound different? Ive been waiting for a game that has accurate gunshots for years
@@astrosnappy most games put the weapons so close to the face in order to let the player see the stylish design and details of the gun But it looks weird Almost as if placing the gun on our shoulders Rdr 2 focusses more on realism
I actually felt like I was playing bf1 when using first person mode in rdr2 especially since the game has practically all the same weapons in bf1 except for the smgs
Honestly there’s one offender in Red Dead, maybe two. The bigger of them is that he shoots a sawed off with one hand and somehow doesn’t break his whole wrist, and the other is the fast reloads, but that is a skill that can be mastered, so it’s believable.
@@amusinglizard2785 A sawed off shotgun has all the power of a non-sawed off one. You know that right? Literally the only difference between them is that one is smaller and more compact.
It really bothered me that the Single Action Army (Cattleman Revolver) wasn't shot while fanning. It would've actually be a better comparison to the Peacekeeper.
I’ve played online for years and finally went back to restart my story mode and I realized how slow Arthur and John shoot. I became furious when I fired a carcano and it took the same amount of time as a rolling block
I don't know why Rockstar hasn't added the Winchester 1895 to RDR2 yet. Fits the time period obviously, and it would be the hardest hitting repeater of the current lineup.
It's probably in the game under a different name, notice how they don't have any actual real life gun companies in rdr2 like they did in rdr1 like Winchester and Henry, LeMat and Springfield and Schofield are all models rather than companies
@@spencersinclair2239 There's 4 other repeaters in the game; the 1895 isn't there. It would be easy to spot because it uses rifle caliber rather than traditional repeaters using pistol caliber rounds.
@@spencersinclair2239 the Lancaster repeater is really a Winchester repeater, specifically I believe heavily based on the Winchester 1866 model. Having an 1895 model would be amazing as well. Maybe even get creative. Like the browning auto 5 shotgun is in the game, even though it was created in 1898 it really didn’t hit the market until 1903.
Animations: Tie, both are good for their respective type of play. Sounds: Tie, both are punchy. Models: Tie, both are high-quality and detailed. Verdict: This is one of the few comparisons which both games can't really overrun each other, at least in my opinion.
The model for the Schofield revolver and other select guns in RDR2 look horribly pixelated, I would say with confidence that the models are on battlefield's side
It's so sad that a game from 2016 looks better than most of today's shooters. Not a fan of most of the animations from RDR2, but knowing that the game is intended to play in third person mostly, they are pretty impressive. But their FOV gives me anxiety.
Well it's actually a feature it's not realistic and gone update the game and you can still do it you never fully I did the feature but it's still doable which in my opinion just makes a sniper two-way better I love using the iron sight of the carcano
RDR2 actually doesn't look that bad, but a single bullet reload and a little bit of refining on the Borchart C93 chambering animation will make it even better.
Comparing the lever-action repeaters is a bit of a stretch in my opinion since the Winchester 1866 (Lancaster) and 1895 are from opposite ends of the lever-action era in American firearms, but still a nice video.
First person in Rdr2 feels incredibly clunky and is impossible to use during hectic fights, while in most games the third person perspective is the clunky buggy version.
Well I mean rockstar always makes 3rd person games I think this was the first time dabbling in that regard aside from gta v which also had clunky mechanics fps. What I’m saying is that it’s not their area of expertise I might be just fanboying over rdr but I do prefer it’s fun mechanics over bf1 I played both games but I might hold a biased opinion
It’s probably because 1: moving certain directions while change the camera even though FPS game dont do that and 2 the sprinting in general is impossible to control while in FO
To be fair to Red Dead about the dynamite though, there were multiple instances of setting up plungers to dynamite like we see in battlefield, but its even more realistic with the time to set, wire to all bundles and failure of the wire/plunger
"High level npc" -A battalion of cops can spawn in the middle of the forest -NPC can still recognize you even if you are wearing a bandana (if your wanted) -Somehow cops can spawn in the middle of nowhere during train robbery And yes the gameplay design is bad
"just online shooter" means you don't explore BF1 well. Its SP campaigns that no BF has reached (BFBC, not 2, is different level, thought). Varied story from heart-touching to encouraging. The opening game is one of the best, to show humanity to both engaging sides. Then there's little kid in group that thought war is just like adventure. Also, there's gambling man who thought messing with military aircarft is so fun he had to trick the true owner only end up in worst place ever. And many more... And they're served in less linear levels. A plus value for a shooter game. So yeah, BF1 is more than online shooter.
The Winchester model 1866 (in rdr2: Lancaster repeater) is not the Winchester 1895 (aka Russian 1895) Still a great video!!! I’ve been wanting this exact video for months lol!!! Great job…definitely leaving. A like and looking at your other stuff.
They were actually American rifles sold to Russia, who then made slight changes to the gun. Like the clip feature, the gun was obsolete in comparison to the Mosin-Nagant but it did get minor utilization.
@@nipplecream3099 Depends on what your doing IMO. Worth the Russian front, most infantry would’ve been better off with a Mosin. But if you were say, a Cossack on a horse, you’d be way better off with the 1895.
@@nipplecream3099 Thing is that it wasn’t muddy on the Russian front. It was dry and cold. The trenches they had were far more wide and didn’t get very muddy. Worst part was the snow flooding in during the winter.
i think rdr2 did the revolvers way better. I thought the definite difference was in reloading where in bsttlefield he drops in all bullets at once while in rdr2 arthur reloads single bullets which is way more realistic
@@SirDrakeFrancis oh , I thought that map is from bfv an not bf1 , i need to go back playing bf games, been playing gta v so much lately, thank you man
Think about this. RDR2 has such attention to detail and heart and love and soul put into it that it can stand toe-to-toe with one of the most graphically demanding games of the last console generation. Sure, you can tell the animation work is less fluid and detailed in RDR2 but it’s meant to be played *in third person* the fact that it can be a solid comparison to a functionally locked first person game is astounding. Even Dice’s other games in 3rd person don’t stand up to scrutiny like this. RDR2 is a masterpiece. BF1 is too, don’t get me wrong they’re both excellent games, but I’ll always have a soft spot for the cowboy game
@@_SP64_ specifically it’s a Winchester rifle modified to fire Russian ammo, because Russia didn’t have enough arms for its soldiers they commissioned Winchester to make mosin nagants along with modifying existing Winchester rifles to take Russian ammunition
@@naluanj9628 nigga why can you get a musket from the 1700s in gta5 where it takes place in modern times what do you mean the 1895 isn't in the timeline
@@michaelwesten4624 nation divided works with an emulator (havent tried anything else myself). the other game just needs some fixes and messing with settings
Slow down the video on the Mauser C96 with RDR2, the hammer doesn't even move up so how is the gun firing? I slowed it down all the way and didn't see it move an inch
Really wish they had the Mauser 98, Gewehr M95, Mosin Nagant, The M1879 Reichsrevolver, or the Nagant M1895 I. Rdr2. They are in need of some new guns and these are the ones that should be added.
slow your roll there, let’s get things like the Winchester 92/94, Marlin rifles, Merwin & Hulbert revolver, Sharps rifle, Remington 1858, Colt 1860 Army, and maybe some Derringers first
Battlefield 1 weapon animations are superior. And it should be. Because it's a fps game. You can't deny. Rdr2 is okay, but nothing really special (if we compare it to other fps games in general). The worst part is, there's no animation when you are holding a gun while walking or running. But I don't mind it. Since most players play rdr2 in third person perspective anyway. I play both games. And I'm a battlefield veteran. Been playing since BF2. Still playing BF1 (about 800 hours playtime). So I know exactly what I'm talking about.
@@jasonlou2013S you were talking about the feelings on the guns, so I think RDR2 is better in this case, because you can clean your guns. I wasn‘t talking about the Gameplay
The C96 in RDR2 is more correct than in BF1. Removing that stripper clip closes the action instantly. The 12g in BF1 and RDR2 will never load because the bolt release isn't depressed.
@@nik7on4ikxd24 I didn't know since I bought it in 2018 either, but one day my 9 year old little cousin was killing everyone in Rhodes when I noticed he was looking down the sight in fp mode I was WHAT, I finished the game. I was 89% of the game and didn't know it. LOL, and I was like these damn Fortnite kids
@@blessz0591 Hahah, it's true, my brother, it's true))) In general, thank you again, I have long seen how Russian UA-camrs can shoot like this, but all the time I thought that these were mods, and when I asked what kind of mod this was, no one answered me. Now there is a reason to go through RDR2 again, but in the first person. Thanks P.s. And I didn't know that you, like us, hate the Fortnight community;) funny
@@nik7on4ikxd24 hahaha yes fuck fortnite, are you from Russia? I thought you were british or american, I am not either I am from Spain bro, greetings from Seville mediterranean vibes!! P.s I had a Latvian friend back in the school
Yes you are correct the red dead 2 version is the regular commercial Winchester 1897 shotgun for like cattle and self defense the one in battlefield 1 is a trench gun,trench shotguns were made for the military and having modifications like the 1897 trench gun having slam fire,heat shield,and a bayonet holder.
@@_SP64_ yes but both have different features,uses,and trench variants dose usually have a short barrel while the commercial variants can have longer barrels yes both are the same gun but both have different uses and the trench version has more upgrades to it then the commercial version,Yes your correct it’s the same gun I was just explaining the major differences between them and how their not the exact same thing head to toe but are the same pump action shotguns.
@@_SP64_ I will say which I forgot to mention their the same pump action shotgun but also have very different features and uses so thank you for reminding me I forgot to add that part.
I'll give had soft with the first 1 than in will in what in Red Dead Redemption 2 because instead of you holding it literally to your eyes your character keeps it far
Considering the Events of RDR2 take place 15 years before the Great War… these weapons over the decade and a half have been greatly improved upon and shouldn’t be compared, only by cosmetic.
![Red Dead Redemption 2 & 1 - All Gang Members' Deaths (from Davey to Abigail) [PC, 4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5gjVpYQ9DWQ/mqdefault.jpg)
at least rockstar now knows that you have to insert every shotgun shell instead of "just one shell and the shotgun will be full"
I think they will do, because the new shotgun in gta online (spas 12) has this feature
@@sngamer111 new shotgun? What are u talking about
@@sngamer111 whoa I didn’t even know about that nvm guess I know what I’m doing today lmao
It's been like a year since they add these weapons 😂
@@sngamer111 you probably haven't played Manhunt 2, because in the game you have to insert every shell to fully charge (8rd). The same with revolver, every round.
For a game meant to be played in third person,RDR2's animations are surprisingly good.
And for a game meant to be played in first person Battlefield 1's third person animations are also surprisingly good, who knew?
@@bullymaguire517 Put some dirt in your eye.
@@worldstarmoney7213 his name is bully its his job
Meant to be played in third person?
what you playing at ? its a games that offers players to play in first or third person.
Weird to think these two games' time period are within like 20 years of each other
Well, that depends on which character you are playing with, if you play with Arthur, it's 15 years, but if you are playing with John, it will be only 7 years before the war breaks out
@@Cape18 and it depends what year battlefield 1 takes place in
@@Goldrunner1169 the war only went for 3-4 years. It’s not that much of a difference.
@@ImNotFine44 it's around 50% of the 7 years difference. How is that barley anything?
@@Goldrunner1169 compared to the difference between the characters’ years I’d say it’s a lot more tame. Either way it doesn’t make to much of a difference on the weapon selection as they’re a lot different with the either war. whether it be during the start or end of the war you still have a lot of things that are similar and different to the time period in rdr2. The only difference being the number of weapons, vehicles and other machines.
The guy shooting the guns in BF1 is just grown up Jack
That's actually really interesting to think about
Jack could have been drafted
@@thecumbucketofficial he was 19 in 1914 so yes he could have been
@@griff1240 depends tho, he was a criminal
@@thecumbucketofficial a lot of criminals who were caught we’re send off to fight wars back then, so it would kind of make sense
A lot of RDR2's animations are sped up, which seems at odds with the whole "hold square to do everything slowly" theme of the rest of the game
@@ghosttoast8610 He's not, because there are no blue or orange icons on the minimap, the horse icon has a saddle on it, and it looks like he's wearing the legend of the east outfit
@@mpirenews yeahhhh I saw that after lmao,I went to delete my comment but couldn’t find it again
@@mpirenews he has the navy revolver which he pulls out at the dynamite segment of the video this means hes either playing online or modding single player
@@silverrr7206 That’s the lemat, because it has 9 rounds in the chamber and the navy only has 6. It also looks like a lemat
Yeah, the SAA animation comparison was interesting especially. Like as flashy as BF1’s animations are, you actually see him using the ejector rod, which you don’t in RDR2
RDR2 is surprisingly good especially for a third-person game
The H&K G11 is surprisingly good especially for a cancelled gun
@@chudthug you mean kraut space magic
lol what? RDR2 is a fps/tps game.
they did the same with gta 5 new gen ports
Well gta was released with tps but ended up adding fps later where rd2 was fully released with both
The animation of Peacekeeper in Battlefield 1 is more cowboy and gunslinger-ish than RDR2's Cattleman Revolver, despite being a WW1 game
Because the peacekeeper is a parody of the Wild West gunslinging tricks.
@Muzzle Flash You have not played RDR2
@Muzzle Flash have you played Red Dead Redemption 2
RDR2 allow you to fan the revolver
RDR2 has the same shooting animation by only pressing the trigger
Attention to detail: when firing a double barrel shotgun in Red Dead Redemption 2 arthur moves his finger to the other trigger
And the sounds of the gunshots echoing through the wind is incredibly accurate, notice how all the gunshots and echoes sound different? Ive been waiting for a game that has accurate gunshots for years
Is it just me or does the guns in RDR2 look small while in first person
It looks awful
@@vicho5960 u look awful
@@whitejasminerice2264 toxic
Mainly because you actually don't put the weapon 2 millimetre from your face like most games
@@astrosnappy most games put the weapons so close to the face in order to let the player see the stylish design and details of the gun
But it looks weird
Almost as if placing the gun on our shoulders
Rdr 2 focusses more on realism
I actually felt like I was playing bf1 when using first person mode in rdr2 especially since the game has practically all the same weapons in bf1 except for the smgs
I didn't see a LeMat in this video ;-;
@@spencersinclair2239 cuz there is no lemat in bf1
Imagine rdr2 with smgs😧
the amount of smgs for a ww1 game was kinda funny
Honestly there’s one offender in Red Dead, maybe two. The bigger of them is that he shoots a sawed off with one hand and somehow doesn’t break his whole wrist, and the other is the fast reloads, but that is a skill that can be mastered, so it’s believable.
Iys not that bad to shoot a shotgun 1 handed
@@amusinglizard2785
A sawed off shotgun has all the power of a non-sawed off one. You know that right? Literally the only difference between them is that one is smaller and more compact.
@@Lolpy. yes I know I've shot them before it's rough but it's not that bad
in RDR2 the more you use a gun the faster the reload animation so its possible that they have mastered all guns in RD and that why its so fast
But the C96 is a problem. He reloads a whole clip when there is 1 shot left in there.
It really bothered me that the Single Action Army (Cattleman Revolver) wasn't shot while fanning. It would've actually be a better comparison to the Peacekeeper.
I’ve played online for years and finally went back to restart my story mode and I realized how slow Arthur and John shoot. I became furious when I fired a carcano and it took the same amount of time as a rolling block
The fact that both games are Set 7-10 years from each other is crazy
I don't know why Rockstar hasn't added the Winchester 1895 to RDR2 yet. Fits the time period obviously, and it would be the hardest hitting repeater of the current lineup.
It's probably in the game under a different name, notice how they don't have any actual real life gun companies in rdr2 like they did in rdr1 like Winchester and Henry, LeMat and Springfield and Schofield are all models rather than companies
@@spencersinclair2239 There's 4 other repeaters in the game; the 1895 isn't there. It would be easy to spot because it uses rifle caliber rather than traditional repeaters using pistol caliber rounds.
@@TACADD I'd guess the Lancaster repeater would be closest to the Winchester, just change the metals and you're golden
@@spencersinclair2239 the Lancaster repeater is really a Winchester repeater, specifically I believe heavily based on the Winchester 1866 model. Having an 1895 model would be amazing as well. Maybe even get creative. Like the browning auto 5 shotgun is in the game, even though it was created in 1898 it really didn’t hit the market until 1903.
Animations: Tie, both are good for their respective type of play.
Sounds: Tie, both are punchy.
Models: Tie, both are high-quality and detailed.
Verdict: This is one of the few comparisons which both games can't really overrun each other, at least in my opinion.
The model for the Schofield revolver and other select guns in RDR2 look horribly pixelated, I would say with confidence that the models are on battlefield's side
@Aveteran Player I play rd2 on ultra and it runs just fine
It's so sad that a game from 2016 looks better than most of today's shooters. Not a fan of most of the animations from RDR2, but knowing that the game is intended to play in third person mostly, they are pretty impressive. But their FOV gives me anxiety.
is it only me or rdr2 shotguns look like roblox when aimed down the sights
Bf1 absolutely doesnt look better than any 2021 shooter
@@respectableindividual4593 Considering how many crappy shooters are released today, yes, it does.
@@SellingSouls Lmfao the mental gymnastics
@@respectableindividual4593 The fuck are you even talking about? lol.
I like rdr2s clink for the shotgun brass. Shotgun shells back then were all brass and reloaded as plastic wasn't a thing obviously.
Do an RDR2 vs Hunt: Showdown.
That would be cool
Did Rockstar ever add a way to take the scopes off the sniper rifles so you can do that without using a glitch? :/
The scopes are addable to the rifles
No I don’t think so
@@TheGuy12463 I mean the Rolling Block and Carcano. Last time I played the scopes weren't optional for them but they were for other rifles
Well it's actually a feature it's not realistic and gone update the game and you can still do it you never fully I did the feature but it's still doable which in my opinion just makes a sniper two-way better I love using the iron sight of the carcano
*what have I done…*
4:29 RDR2 rockstar intro
He used 7.62ammo bruh
@@wunpis9541 no he did not “putted” 7.62 ammo
@@nipplecream3099 grammatical mistake
@@wunpis9541 well 7.62 wasn’t
Red dead redemption 2 is a masterpiece
red dead animations are on par with fallout 3
@@michaelwesten4624 then u havent played fallout 3 ; )
@@michaelwesten4624 Don't compare it with shitty fallout 3
This was my suggestion, thank you for making this vid a reality :D
:D
:D
Everyone saying RDR2 is surprisingly good, even though the developers intentionally placed a first person view in the game.
Either the hands are to big or the gun is to small in Red Dead Redemption 2
Arthur is a big guy, John is average, so, likely just an animation being to bulky.
Believe it or not, these gun are actually not so big, lol a repeater was the size of my entire arm, apart the fov was changed
Or the guns are not as big as you may think
Bf1 : normal reloading
Rdr2 : i have speed cola
R2r: we have the best protegonist of the history of the videogames, and a excelent history, and a awesome map
Battlefield: DETAILS
BF1 War Story are good, though. And the opening was truly outstanding. And they used it for different characters.
RDR2 actually doesn't look that bad, but a single bullet reload and a little bit of refining on the Borchart C93 chambering animation will make it even better.
Well, the peacekeeper is unfair cus it haves the best animations of almost all games
I think Winchester and Lancaster comparison was superfluous
bruh you can run BF1 at ultra, but not RDR2? this is a disgrace to RDR2's art style to see every texture as a paste
Ya'll can argue which game is best, but really both these games are ELITE.
mediocre game and a half assed console port
@@michaelwesten4624 console port?? Rdr 2 was on console before pc.
@@michaelwesten4624 settle down, okay?
How to create an internet war ?*
Nevertheless BF1 and RDR2 are both masterpieces and that's a fact.
Comparing the lever-action repeaters is a bit of a stretch in my opinion since the Winchester 1866 (Lancaster) and 1895 are from opposite ends of the lever-action era in American firearms, but still a nice video.
The M1895 is the only lever action rifle in BF1
so jack was 16 in RDR1... so he was 19 when WW1 started. he very well could've been drafted into WW1 when the US entered in 1916
1917*
First person in Rdr2 feels incredibly clunky and is impossible to use during hectic fights, while in most games the third person perspective is the clunky buggy version.
Well I mean rockstar always makes 3rd person games I think this was the first time dabbling in that regard aside from gta v which also had clunky mechanics fps. What I’m saying is that it’s not their area of expertise I might be just fanboying over rdr but I do prefer it’s fun mechanics over bf1 I played both games but I might hold a biased opinion
It wasnt. The first time they tried to do first person was in GTA V remastered.
@@zaracatunga1879 Yeah, I mentioned that in the comment above
It’s probably because 1: moving certain directions while change the camera even though FPS game dont do that and 2 the sprinting in general is impossible to control while in FO
I hate how the camera is placed and how slow everything is. You also can't look at the ground completely down which is just dumb.
BF 3, 4, 1 and V has some oddly similar gun sound effects. Well maybe for the signature of their game.
Thing I like about rdr2 is that all guns are super damaging to enemies. You just gotta hit them where is hurts
2:04
to hide his Origin name he literally uses the channel logo, interesting
I really do appreciate this video it shows us how red dead 1 in 1914 could have been 😎👍
To be fair to Red Dead about the dynamite though, there were multiple instances of setting up plungers to dynamite like we see in battlefield, but its even more realistic with the time to set, wire to all bundles and failure of the wire/plunger
Remember, rdr2 is open world game with a huge story and a lot of details in environment and high level npc, bf just online shooter)
"High level npc"
-A battalion of cops can spawn in the middle of the forest
-NPC can still recognize you even if you are wearing a bandana (if your wanted)
-Somehow cops can spawn in the middle of nowhere during train robbery
And yes the gameplay design is bad
"just online shooter" means you don't explore BF1 well. Its SP campaigns that no BF has reached (BFBC, not 2, is different level, thought). Varied story from heart-touching to encouraging. The opening game is one of the best, to show humanity to both engaging sides. Then there's little kid in group that thought war is just like adventure. Also, there's gambling man who thought messing with military aircarft is so fun he had to trick the true owner only end up in worst place ever. And many more... And they're served in less linear levels. A plus value for a shooter game.
So yeah, BF1 is more than online shooter.
@@alamo134 nah, anyway rdr2 is better, stfu pidor)0)0)
Jack, canonically speaking, COULD'VE served in WW1 in 1917
he will probably serve in 1918 at the end of the war
2:16 look how he reload
How he was shooting the gun too hahaha that game looks absolutely shit
@@niggad5511 what do you mean? He was shooting normally with faster action and just reloading it
How tf does he still have ideas for videos to this very day
this wat happens when the grind doesnt stop
The Winchester model 1866 (in rdr2: Lancaster repeater) is not the Winchester 1895 (aka Russian 1895)
Still a great video!!! I’ve been wanting this exact video for months lol!!! Great job…definitely leaving. A like and looking at your other stuff.
well the magazine magically pop up out of the blue..
Pistols and Riffles: Battlefield 1
Revolvers and Shotguns: RDR2
Uhhhm i dont see how the Lancaster (Winchester i think) is related to a magazine/clip Russian riffle.
They were actually American rifles sold to Russia, who then made slight changes to the gun. Like the clip feature, the gun was obsolete in comparison to the Mosin-Nagant but it did get minor utilization.
@@Lolpy. i’d take the 1895 over the Mosin any day
@@nipplecream3099
Depends on what your doing IMO. Worth the Russian front, most infantry would’ve been better off with a Mosin. But if you were say, a Cossack on a horse, you’d be way better off with the 1895.
@@Lolpy. the 1895 is better in mud than the Mosin believe it or not
@@nipplecream3099
Thing is that it wasn’t muddy on the Russian front. It was dry and cold. The trenches they had were far more wide and didn’t get very muddy. Worst part was the snow flooding in during the winter.
You did not do RDR2 any justice with these Ultra Low Res texture settings...
Whenever i play any shooter games my mind always thinks about Any Winchesters, Double Barrel Shotguns, and Trench Guns. Idk why
i think rdr2 did the revolvers way better. I thought the definite difference was in reloading where in bsttlefield he drops in all bullets at once while in rdr2 arthur reloads single bullets which is way more realistic
only in the top-break revolvers, in all the revolvers set up with an ejection rod and loading gate BF 1 does it better
You fucking idiot the no.3 revolver uses a speed loader
2:00 which bfv map is this !?
tahure
@@SirDrakeFrancis oh , I thought that map is from bfv an not bf1 , i need to go back playing bf games, been playing gta v so much lately, thank you man
@@tdRockxc568 no problem
Man, I wish there was a prototype of PO8 Luger in RDR2
that's literally the semi auto pistol
@@williamjames7293 no
@@RussellAdlerCIA it is, the C93 is just the predecessor to the Luger
I absolutely love bf1!! The best one of the series.
1:42
COD BOCW : impossible
Even a third-person shooter game can make that
Red dead seems to be played at lower settings, the textures look bad.
Probably his computer wasn't powerful enough
No wtf
It looks fine wdym?
I think you have a computer made in 1989
No. I`m playing highest graphics settings and it looks like that on First person.
The red dead sounds are so good
Also why are you shooting slower in red dead? I know that’s not the fastest because I play it
Makes me think if there any gunslingers during World War I Who faut in the war
I mean Jack Marston became a gunslinger In 1914 i think he was 18 or 19 then so yeah definetly possible
Think about this. RDR2 has such attention to detail and heart and love and soul put into it that it can stand toe-to-toe with one of the most graphically demanding games of the last console generation. Sure, you can tell the animation work is less fluid and detailed in RDR2 but it’s meant to be played *in third person* the fact that it can be a solid comparison to a functionally locked first person game is astounding. Even Dice’s other games in 3rd person don’t stand up to scrutiny like this. RDR2 is a masterpiece. BF1 is too, don’t get me wrong they’re both excellent games, but I’ll always have a soft spot for the cowboy game
I hate how the dynamite in RDR2 explosion is weak, even RDR1 dynamite explosion is stronger and it's accurate
5:44 Actually, the Landcaster Repeater is based off the Winchester Model 1866, not anything made by the Russians.
It’s the only lever action in BF1 it’s actually the Winchester M1895. The Russians just just used a lot of them
@@_SP64_ specifically it’s a Winchester rifle modified to fire Russian ammo, because Russia didn’t have enough arms for its soldiers they commissioned Winchester to make mosin nagants along with modifying existing Winchester rifles to take Russian ammunition
Ya know... it's not really fair when you set the graphics in red dead to lowest and then try to compare them to BF1 on highest quality
I`m playing RDR2 on highest graphics settings and it still looks blurry. I think it`s RDR2`s problem. I saw a video about that problem.
rdr2 has worse optimisation than bf1 so ofc he plays on higher settings on bf1
I mean god damn
Red dead gun engravings never look as bad for me as they do in the vid
The C93 pistol was meant to held in two hands not one
I've always wanted the Peacekeeper in BF1, but I don't have the time or patience to screw around with Morse code.
No other games can beat this masterpiece like
GTA 5 Cyberpunk 2077 among us
apex legend not even Call of duty
Damn the peacekeepers animation's only are worth going trough all that hell to unlock it
Battlefield 1 hold up very well when comparing to rdr2
Nooo man battlefield 1 guns look plastic
@@lorenzovilla2385 then what she rd2 guns?
Foam?
The sawed off makes no sense you would destroy your arm if u tried one handed
I play re village but story so short, after that i play rdr2. I said: what the hel this game like real life, i finish story 100% 1 years damn.
Rdr2 story was more than a story it a live experience Arthur Morgan was the best character ever well miss that cow poke
The fact that the Winchester 1895 isnt in RDR2 is kinda disappointing. It could have made an excellent high damage Repeater, or a faster firing Rifle.
yeah because RDR2 is set in 1899 not 1895 the timeline doesn't match up
@@naluanj9628 no the prologue with John is set in 1907
@@lillilgirls1378 and isnt set in 1895 when the winchester m1895 was made in so you cant get it
@@naluanj9628 nigga why can you get a musket from the 1700s in gta5 where it takes place in modern times what do you mean the 1895 isn't in the timeline
@@josephsilva9403 that was satire
Fastest man in the west vs a ww1 soldier
😳😳😳😳😳😳😳
😳😳😳😳😳😳
😳😳😳😳😳😳😳
😳😳😳😳😳
😳😳😳😳😳
Could you do a weapons showcase for History Channels Civil War games?
those games don't run on modern hardware like at all and your pc just dies
@@michaelwesten4624 nation divided works with an emulator (havent tried anything else myself). the other game just needs some fixes and messing with settings
Slow down the video on the Mauser C96 with RDR2, the hammer doesn't even move up so how is the gun firing? I slowed it down all the way and didn't see it move an inch
Magic obviously
Really wish they had the Mauser 98, Gewehr M95, Mosin Nagant, The M1879 Reichsrevolver, or the Nagant M1895 I. Rdr2. They are in need of some new guns and these are the ones that should be added.
slow your roll there, let’s get things like the Winchester 92/94, Marlin rifles, Merwin & Hulbert revolver, Sharps rifle, Remington 1858, Colt 1860 Army, and maybe some Derringers first
late comment: a lot of those guns would be really out of place in the Old American West
yo what, i just noticed that the rdr2 semiauto shotgun's barrel moved when firing??
Both of these games are so gorgeous that if not for the Red Dead HUD you probably wouldn’t be able to tell which is which
Honestly i'm not a fan of the "pew", sound of the schofield in RDR2
me neither it sounds nothing like what a robust and bold revolver from the wild west should sound like
Just be glad its not GTA sound effects
Oh hey its my favourite rdr2 moddef
Battlefield 1 weapon animations are superior. And it should be. Because it's a fps game. You can't deny.
Rdr2 is okay, but nothing really special (if we compare it to other fps games in general). The worst part is, there's no animation when you are holding a gun while walking or running. But I don't mind it. Since most players play rdr2 in third person perspective anyway.
I play both games. And I'm a battlefield veteran. Been playing since BF2. Still playing BF1 (about 800 hours playtime). So I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Dude how do you aim down the sights in RDR2? I am on PC and still can't find any key to aim down the sights.
Use your mouse wheel
@@TigerfieldYT lol have finished the game and still didn't know. Rockstar is just able to think up the most ridiculous controls ever lmao.
How do you fully aim in RDR?
Press down on the d pad
@@ogbussag225 😀thank you!
If only other FPS games have the same reload speed of Rockstar’s……
Well, COD is pretty fast compared to other fps shooting game imo
BF1 has a more real feeling on all guns.
@@peashote2 Yep, but clean gun feature is not necessary in BF1, it will slow down the gameplay.
I bet horse testicle in BF1 doesn't resize when cold 😎
no the hands are far too animated, the soldier flings his hands really excessively when reloading. unlike the realistic rdr2
No I don‘t think so. In Red Dead Redemption 2 you can clean your guns and the guns in Battlefield are too big or the hands are too smal
@@jasonlou2013S you were talking about the feelings on the guns, so I think RDR2 is better in this case, because you can clean your guns. I wasn‘t talking about the Gameplay
BF1 is just in another league, that game is truly a passion filled masterpiece.
The C96 in RDR2 is more correct than in BF1. Removing that stripper clip closes the action instantly.
The 12g in BF1 and RDR2 will never load because the bolt release isn't depressed.
well in BF1 he hits the carrier release button… but that didn’t exist till the 1950s soooo
BfV had the 12g reload correct
Reminds me how we made a world war 1 movie on red dead
why did u not include the hipfire on rdr?
Lancaster I think it a Winchester. Hey can you cover Star Wars guns in rdr2? I think the Mauser and bolt action are the only ones but I could wrong
two games that were ahead of its time
I just realized the semi auto in rdr2 has a moving barrel
yep, it’s short recoil operated
How does he manage to shoot at the front sight in RDR2?
Press the cross button + down while you are carrying a weapon
@@blessz0591 God, dude, I went through RDR2 ON PLATINUM and did not know about it, many Russian thanks
@@nik7on4ikxd24 I didn't know since I bought it in 2018 either, but one day my 9 year old little cousin was killing everyone in Rhodes when I noticed he was looking down the sight in fp mode I was WHAT, I finished the game. I was 89% of the game and didn't know it. LOL, and I was like these damn Fortnite kids
@@blessz0591 Hahah, it's true, my brother, it's true)))
In general, thank you again, I have long seen how Russian UA-camrs can shoot like this, but all the time I thought that these were mods, and when I asked what kind of mod this was, no one answered me. Now there is a reason to go through RDR2 again, but in the first person. Thanks
P.s. And I didn't know that you, like us, hate the Fortnight community;) funny
@@nik7on4ikxd24 hahaha yes fuck fortnite, are you from Russia? I thought you were british or american, I am not either I am from Spain bro, greetings from Seville mediterranean vibes!!
P.s I had a Latvian friend back in the school
my 2 favorite games of all time
mine as well, good choice.
There can only be one winner
@@afrikaanstotdieeinde7204 then it's rdr2 imo
@@MaartenSummers nice
@@sohel80123 good choice
the m97 and the pump action arent the same thing. i mean yeah they both are shotguns but the one in bf is a slamfire
Yes you are correct the red dead 2 version is the regular commercial Winchester 1897 shotgun for like cattle and self defense the one in battlefield 1 is a trench gun,trench shotguns were made for the military and having modifications like the 1897 trench gun having slam fire,heat shield,and a bayonet holder.
@@bradykohel7907 the trench version is just a variant of the M1897
@@_SP64_ yes but both have different features,uses,and trench variants dose usually have a short barrel while the commercial variants can have longer barrels yes both are the same gun but both have different uses and the trench version has more upgrades to it then the commercial version,Yes your correct it’s the same gun I was just explaining the major differences between them and how their not the exact same thing head to toe but are the same pump action shotguns.
@@_SP64_ I will say which I forgot to mention their the same pump action shotgun but also have very different features and uses so thank you for reminding me I forgot to add that part.
I'll give had soft with the first 1 than in will in what in Red Dead Redemption 2 because instead of you holding it literally to your eyes your character keeps it far
Finally someone that realize that you don't put your head near of the sight
Hm, Can't tell who's better
The hammer on the Mauser Pistol doesn't even move in RDR2
Bruh thats realistic it goes too fast To notice it in irl as well
@@yee5074 No I'm saying the hammer on the in-game model doesn't move at all.
@@imperialbricks1977 im like 99% sure it does normallly, this guy has the settings on as low as possible so that might have some thing To do with it
Considering the Events of RDR2 take place 15 years before the Great War… these weapons over the decade and a half have been greatly improved upon and shouldn’t be compared, only by cosmetic.
I truly enjoy both games so much they are inanely good
Where are you on the map?
Looks like Guarma
PEACEKEEPER?! damn you lucky!