Real Lawyer Reacts: WILD Court Moment: Judge Violates A Criminal Defendant's Rights & Then Walks Out
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 кві 2024
- #lawyeryouknow
🔴 Do you or someone you know need to speak to a real lawyer about a case? Or do you find yourself needing legal advice? Please reach out to our firm and we will make sure to answer your questions or find someone who can. Our consultations are always free and confidential. You can call our firm at (727)441-9030 or email us at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com.
✅ For business inquiries contact me at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com
✅ Let's connect: www.tragoslaw.com/
Twitter - @tragoslaw
Instagram - /tragoslaw
Facebook - /tragoslaw
TikTok - /tragoslaw
✅ Join our email list here - bit.ly/33lV3Mb
✅ Get your Lawyer You Know merch here - bit.ly/LYKMerch
✅ Become a LYK Channel Member Here - bit.ly/3OecDDD
SUPERCHATS & DISCLAIMER - 1. Superchats read out are not to be taken as my opinion nor endorsed by me. 2.Questions are answers on best efforts based on my knowledge and jurisdiction.
🔴 NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Intro & Outro Music: DOLYJJVS2W8MGNFM - Розваги
This is EXACTLY why cameras need to stay in court rooms! Violation of someone’s rights needs to be called out and acted on (by the appropriate individuals).
Agreed. Cameras aren't just about judges. Prosecutors and defense attorneys need cameras on them too. Cameras will hold recorders accountable too.
Exactly!
The fact you state cameras need to stay is the problem. There should be no arguement against cameras, more so all procedings should be love streamed
So yes, so many things get missed and things slip through the cracks. It is sad those "things" that slip through are people. 👓
This is why corrupt government doesn't want cameras because it show how corrupt they are.
This is why lifetime appointments for judges is wrong. They believe they are gods on Earth.
This is a state case, not federal. They are elected.
Lifetime is only for the supreme court justices for a specific reason. This is so there's no risk of their behaviour being dictated by upcoming elections 6sd we clearly saw with judge macafee and Fulton county da Fani Willis whom he refuses dismiss from the Trump case due to his uocoming election.
They do believe their GODS for sure. No accountability whatsoever...
@@seniorstube6683true, BUT I live in a small town, Unless no one runs for judge, they can go Unaposed for Years!
The only lifetime appointments is the Supreme Court, the rest are elected and have age limits.🤦♀️
This is one of the clearest demonstrations of Judicial bias I've ever seen.
Like the NY Judges
@@santiedormehl3042 I'm assuming you're referring to the current high profile case in New York and I would disagree. That does not show judicial bias as much as it shows the defendant's unwillingness to participate in the judicial process. The rulings against the defendant is simply because the defendant is not following proper procedure and simple doing everything they can to delay the trial by any means.
and what are your thoughts on the executive branch using federal institutions to attack an opposing political party?
(For the record, I don't support Biden or Trump. I believe we need better candidates, congressional reform, and the abolution of corporate lobbying-- and thats just to start. But watching this administration illegally conspire to attack their leading opponent with ridiculous charges they only pursued for the reason that he is the leading opponent, is even more scary to me than what they are accusing Trump of doing.)
@@chilltarts see that's the thing is that isn't what's happening. None of the charges pursued against Trump have anything to do with Biden or his DOJ. The charges are brought by various states with no direct connection to Biden. They aren't being brought by the US attorney general and I don't think their federal charges at all. So the idea that it's a political attack by the president to eliminate his opposing candidate is just not true. It's what Trump wants people to believe though. And I suppose it is working. And even if it was true, if Trump was Innocent it wouldn't matter. They aren't fabricating charges out of thin air. These are things Trump allegedly actually did. Whether they're small or large they are felony acts. Is it wrong for a prosecutor to try a felony case if there is evidence? No. Should Trump get a pass simply because he used to be president. Absolutely not.
@@chilltarts being held accountable for past criminal or alleged criminal actions is not political in nature.
Peter, I'm so glad that these judges are being hit by the sunlight of social media. I bet this judge has been operating in the dark for years with no pushback. Thank you.
Put this Judge in front of his superiors & give him 4 minutes to explain why he shouldn't be fired!
Doesn't work that way he only can be removed by the Arizona state legislature by impeachment or be voted out of office.
How long does it take to say it’s an elected position?
....to be fair, he should get 5 minutes
Love that!
@@Mike-01234 ...Theoretically, the *_Prosecutors_* could charge him with Criminal Conduct & Criminal Intent.
This Judge is about to be reported to the bar by over 336k people!
336k idiots. The bar does not work that way. You'd just be making things worse.
it'll be like 15 people
@@saltybuckeyethat's still an incredible amount for one trial.
IMO the defendant has gotten lost in this.
@@gigibeauchamp This is huge
I was a courtroom clerk and I cannot imagine my judge doing this. I hope he is removed from the bench.
This makes me sick to my stomach. No matter if this defendant is guilty or not, EVERYONE deserves a fair trial. This is a joke.
Agreed! And, imo, the Prosecutor should be equally disgusted if not more than the public.
Innocent until proven guilty. The judge was in effect doing this to an innocent person.
This judge has created a hostile working environment for everyone involved.
Yesss .across the country for GOD SAKE .
I need a glass of beer Rn
@@missyfrederick808YEA BAYBEE
He seems like he’s constipated and gas hemorrhoids .
WOW! In cases of VERY BAD Jidges like this one - I’ve seen prosecutors stand up with defense. They don’t want an appeal if this ends in conviction. Especially on a case like this one that already has a lot of questions. This Judge is unreal. This is absolutely ridiculous! Wow
💯💯💯
Judge should be removed from the bench period! What an unprofessional POS!
It’s been going on for many decades & isn’t the first time & won’t be the last time.
This stuff typically ends in a reprimand or small fine...just like any other govermental institution, the judiciary sector is tightly knit and protects its own, of course as in anything there's always the undeniable which cannot be ignored and then you get a forced resignation or a unbenching
Oh please. War h the trial for yourself. You need the context and follow up
Btw defense attu Brenna Larkin used to fight MMA. Suggest to not Fck with her
@@dsoule4902 what's the trial called? Do you happen to know the summary... for context?
I’m a civil litigator (family law) and cannot imagine a judge imposing strict time limits on a final trial, let alone when a citizen’s freedom is at stake.
@@alexn8767 Who said anything about Juries?
Especially when peoples due process rights are violated by automatic license suspension and their freedom taken away for not paying a debt!! It’s insanity that people would do that to their fellow American citizens!
This right here is why we need cameras in the courtroom! I can’t imagine this incident would get attention if there wasn’t a video. It’s important to shed a light when our rights are violated by people in power and these video recordings help us do that.
My jaw dropped to the floor when he said, "Now you have 4 minutes!! 😳😲
Extremely unprofessional!
Respect and get respected!!
It's like she's in school and been a naughty child the way the judge it talking. So so disrespectful! :O
Such a baby! He needs removed!
Judge needs to retire or be removed from serving.
He needs to go to some corrupt country where they do kangaroo courts. He’d fit right in there. He doesn’t belong in any court in a civilised nation. What an appalling way to behave.
I know. It felt like a slap in the face for me and I wasn’t even there. The defense attorney did not deserve to be shut down like that. Surely there must be something she can do to shut this judge down…find a away to get him removed. There is something wrong with him.
I think there needs to be an investigation into the Judges past court hearings
Obviously he doesn’t care so he’s probably retiring with the best pension and benefits.
So I'm playing catch up and currently watching yesterday's stream of this case...they haven't broke for lunch yet.
I haven't watched the video above but I just wanted to say, allegedly this judge doesn't have a law degree. I could be wrong, but in the pretrial hearings it came up somewhere on Robert Gouveia channel. He usually goes over everyone's credentials.
Please feel free to correct me if you actually know.
Meanwhile I'll go try to find where I heard this.
....Now I'll watch!
First: Make a record that the Judge walked out. Definitely should have put more on the record.
Locals should PEACEFULLY protest outside the court house every single day because of this, until the judge steps down.
Our whole nation should protest this judge, as he is depriving people of their rights. which is a crime. What the corrupt govt officials do to one of us, they do to ALL of us.
Every AZ and national media outlet needs to be covering this story and this judge's despicable behavior.
😂 That’s a twist. Everyone tunes in expecting a political story about a rancher defending his land vs undocumented immigrants and suddenly we’re all watching a judge who doesn’t want to judge and will enact every type of restriction he can conjure up, including hissy fits like a 2-yr-old.
YES!!! Shout this case from the root tops !!! A rancher charged with killing an ilegal alien drug runner who was trespassing The ethnic Mexican LE screwed up royally-- trying to badger this old man & say he said something he hadn't said. Wait til defense pulls of the audio. YES SHOUT THIS VASE FROM THE ROOFTOPS
I absolutely agree because judges are “ELECTED officials!!” Unfortunately, the main stream media/MSM, including all “local media outlets” are all owned by 6 major globalist corporations who no longer provide real “investigate reporting” for “We The People” in order to ensure our government and elected officials are honest and working on our behalf!! Instead, the MSM is BIASED and controlled by the 6 parent companies that own them, and the “news” they are allowed to disseminate to the public is heavily censored and controlled. Everyone eventually learned this during the last “health plandemic” as the MSM “pushed the narrative” dictated by the World Health Organization/WHO globalists and they withheld and even censored critical info about effective treatments that were saving lives, and they withheld and censored serious side effects with the jab!! The MSM has been weaponized against us to push out the SAME “globalist political agenda” these major corporate conglomerates support!! It’s SERIOUS guys, the WHO is in the process right NOW of FINALIZING a GLOBAL “International Pandemic TREATY” for the NEXT plandemic and our current administration SUPPORTS this treaty, and IF we sign on to it, the WHO (a foreign GLOBALIST organization) will dictate everything we in America do, including mandatory lockdowns again & masking, what medicines we can use, mandatory jabs, censorship again of what THEY deem as “misinformation,” etc., and Americans will LOSE their constitutional FREEDOMS and RIGHTS in making our OWN health decisions!! Not only that, but this “treaty” will allow the WHO to even dictate and control the “shipments” of critical supplies, goods and services during the next plandemic!!
It is being covered by lot of news outlets this is the George Kelly murder trial of a illegal immigrant who was on his ranch he shot and killed. I'm surprised no one here knows this. It's all over the news this judge walking out of court.
What is the name of this judge and/or case??
This judge is a POS. Unbelievably outrageous. I’ve been practicing for 26 years. I’ve never seen anything like this.
Never?
@@causeeffect7624Did he stutter?
😂😂😂@@Tina-Trinity
Context: At the start of the day he made mention on the record that a juror was having an issue with their employer, at a break before this he mentioned he had called the employer, and the duration of the trial was discussed.
Other context: One of the first witnesses the prosecution called was the defendants wife, they spent 6 hours questioning her, attempting to impeach her, and cross their own witness(without seeking hostile status) before turning her over to the defense cross.
Thus far all the prosecution witnesses have gone from experts, to "I don't know what that means" for the most simple of questions on cross.
Also, they only run trial 4 days a week.
@@potentiallyacommentor5648Thats what alternate jurors are for.
Imagine being the defendant and you hear the judge trying to speed your defence along! I’d be fuming!
Unless it's obvious the prosecution has bungled it up so bad that the judge wants you to end your arguments ASAP so he can find you not guilty.
Um, I'm gonna want an update on this jerk. 😡
The only update I can give is that the judge ended up declaring a mistrial in this case because the jury couldn't agree on a verdict.
@@christopheraaron8299 I suppose that's at least better than this farce standing
@@christopheraaron8299what judge is this? Peter didn’t say.
@@vivaciousom5347 this is the George Alan Kelly trial in Arizona.Thomas Fink is the judge
@@melissajohnston2697 Thank you very much.
The judge flat out lied to the jury. He said the break was so he could talk to the lawyers and the break length would depend on that conversation. He lied.
That is right!! Good point!!
Go back and listen to what he said. Lol, he lied, isn’t going to cut it on any legal documents. He knew she was making a proffer & didn’t want to hear it. He knew full well she was going to ask him to recuse himself. He’s going about it as he was before the jury came in. He’s going to laugh with his buddies & say that he wasn’t going to sit and listen to her proffer the exact same she proffered when he gave her 4 minutes. He has no business remaining on this case, or being a judge, however, saying he lied isn’t going to matter in any way.
@@dudemorris7769I am confused. You agree the judge lied yet you want to discredit their comment because you think it doesn't matter. They didn't say it mattered so where does your attitude come from?
It doesn’t matter because he told the jury something innocuous-a white lie, if anything. It’s not this jury’s job to hold this judge accountable-it’s the legal community and -if he is an elected judge, the citizens of that jurisdiction. He also gets held accountable by risking getting reversed on appeal.
Unless the break ended shortly after he walked out 🤷♀. The judge is a complete arsehole, but without knowing how long the break lasted, you can't say that was lie (I'm guessing it was, but just playing devils advocate). 😜
That judge is beyond disrespectful. He trampled on the rights of the defendant by not allowing her to adequately question a witness. Limiting her to 4 min was ridiculous!
@@alexn8767No.He must follow the law.The first amendment
@alexn8767 it's ironic you say that he's within his rights to do so when he's literally not, but do carry on spouting bs
This judge is completely unprofessional and needs to be reprimanded.
BEYOND DISRESPECTFUL! He should be barred!😡
The Defense attorney is a warrior. She remained solid while the judge tried to humiliate her. His behavior is atrocious.
Judges can also face repercussions, can they not?
They can but they usually don't. That's why they act like Emperors
I sure hope this judge gets held accountable!! The defendant's rights should never be violated by a hostile judge!
Judges are ruining the judicial system across the nation. I’m only shocked that you are just now realizing this
They can, but it is a bit harder, but absolutely can.
Barely, they have JUDICIAL IMMUNITY.. Judges can get away with crap for 20 yrs. Judges can have 100s of ethics complaints & NOTHING HAPPENS. The WHOLE SYSTEM IS CORRUPT AND A MONEY GRAB..
This judge is out of control. He shouldn't be allowed to rule another second. Unbelievable
If this judge is not reprimanded i have questions for the people in charge
I wonder if this will ever be part of “ judges who ruined their careers in 5 minutes or less”?
I hope the defence aren’t embarrassed. The one person who should be embarrassed is the judge.
I imagine that Defence are livid , not embarrassed !
Are you people British? In the US it’s spelled “defense”.
@@BlackStump172 This was a reply to LYN saying the defence was embarrassed. I too thought they would be livid as well and furthermore the judge should be embarrassed by his behaviour.
@@mrsmartypants_1 well spotted. I am Australian which uses British spelling quite often. My autocorrect or correct options, would have changed it or suggested changes according to Australian spelling. For example, it changes colour from color to colour.
@@sallyannchappell5671 It seems like a lot of British and Australian folks watch our trials.
This cannot be a one off, on how the judge is in the courtroom, he needs to be reviewed on the criminal cases he has sat on.
Yes, this calls into question all of his rulings.
Agreed.
For sure
He's probably been doing this for years.
That was one of the most flagrant misuses of authority I've ever witnessed from a judge. No matter how a lawyer might behave, the judge's fundamental role in the courtroom is to uphold the integrity of the trial process.
This judge needs disciplinary actions taken against him.
The Judge is unprofessional, biased & sassy. He did infringe on the criminal defendant’s rights. He needs to be removed from the Bench
Right up there with the Judge on the Rittenhouse case. Needs to be removed after this level of unprofessional behavior.
I hope that the appellate Court actually watches the video. I would hate for this judge to be able to claim that he truly did not hear her. Her question was "Judge can you hear me?" It is quite clear by watching the video what his intention was. I worry it might be lost in translation through text. Well maybe not lost, but having the waters muddied enough to where the judge can tell the appellate Court that he simply didn't hear her, and he'd like the court to give him the benefit of the doubt based on what he's done in the past in similar situations.
I’d be shocked if the appellate court (assuming it’s appealed) doesn’t find that this judge acting improperly. This is judicial misconduct.
Did you mean the DA on the Rittenhouse case? @@noneayourbusiness5149
@@noneayourbusiness5149
I guess you were rooting for that POS assistant DA, Binger? Nuff said, GTFOH...
Rude and disrespectful! Judge needs to step down from this case.
How many times have we heard Judges say; " This is MY court room"... It is NOT, it in fact is the PEOPLES Court Room.
Nope; this isn't the People's Court; and he's right: he is referred to as "the Court" because he embodies the court. It's his room.
Nope it isn’t. It’s his courtroom
@@alexn8767 Why are you ok with a judge violating a person's constitutional rights while on trial? It's atrocious for the judge to be doing this.
What this judge just did should be enough to declare a mistrial. Then retry with a proper, unbiased judge. This just showed that this defendant is not getting a fair trial. Throw it out, now. This judge is unfit to rule over the court.
the annoying thing is that for that to happen, this specific judge has to rule on a motion seeking to recuse himself or to grant a mistrial based upon his own misconduct. It’s ridiculous. The best judges will ask another judge in their courthouse to hear and rule on motions like that, but it’s not required. so either he recuses himself (unlikely) or the prosecutor does the right thing and joins in the defense’s motion for recusal/mistrial. I have seen that happen before in cases nowhere near this egregious, and a joint motion was enough of a wake up call for the judge to do the right thing. It’s in the prosecution’s interest to make sure this judge doesn’t destroy their chance at a conviction that sticks.
He’s unfit to rule over ANY court and I’d question the “fairness” of OTHER trials that he’s presided over!!
Now that I know this is the George Kelly murder trial I wonder if he is trying to help this guy out by giving him a mistrial. This is a rancher's defense being paid for by Trump supporters. Is this judge a MAGA judge Hmmm very odd behavior for a judge especially in a trail that has nationwide coverage.
The jury was deadlocked for 2 days and couldn't come to a unanimous verdict. Declared a mistrial and prosecutors won't retry.
How are we supposed to believe that the justice system is fair when you have judges like this?
The system doesn't care what we believe. It exists to line the pockets of lobbyists and senators, and crush the citizens if they get too uppity about it.
It's not.
We need to push our legislators to fix the judicial system AND term limits!!!
⚖️🇺🇸
The judicial system is anything but fair!!!
What has happened to our justice system. Seems every judge has decided they can do what they want. This is insane.
This is why we need transparency in the court system. How many other times has this judge behaved like this. And how many judges across the US behave like this….. disgusting.
This judge needs to retire
He was voted in just a few years ago.
@@Tinmann_77more than a reason for him to recuse himself or retire. He’s not cut out for the bench if he’s not respectful to the Defense atty. He also needs to lose his law license so he can never take on another case.
He should be removed from the bench and LOSE his retirement benefits!! If an innocent man/woman is wrongly found guilty because this POS judge DENIED them their RIGHT to a FAIR trial, this judge would be responsible for causing them to lose THEIR freedom AND access to THEIR RETIREMENT, so this judge should lose no LESS!!
He doesn’t need to retire. He needs to be fired.
@@beachgirl4truth672absolutely agree! He should never be able to use his law license, even on the outside of a court room. He has no business having a law license when he’s directly violating a person’s constitutional rights to a fair trial & due process.
He sounds like an annoyed dad scolding a child. "You now have FOUR minutes!" My God, this man should NOT be a judge!
He always takes long breaks 15-30 min each. They don’t meet on Mondays. I haven’t seen one day where they went past 4ish. Prosecutors recalled several of their witnesses to go over the exact same things ad nauseam.
This is a case of a man who lives about a mile from the border, who has illegals with guns and drugs crossing his property. Allegedly there was a shot before he even went outside to check his property when he saw them. The police and border patrol came and did a “search” of the property when it happened. The officers kept saying it wasn’t a full search - just quick to make sure there was no one around anymore. They had a canine who found one casing near the house then a bit later an officer found a handful more in a similar location. The trajectory of the bullet was low on the body to high but the body was found in a wash which was lower than the house where they say he shot from. He says he shot in the air as a warning. No way he hit the guy with a shot like that in the way the body was hit.
If he is convicted this is horrible for the ranchers near the border. They won’t be able to protect themselves or their land from anyone illegally crossing into the US.
I don’t believe he shot this guy based on what I’ve seen and the evidence they have shown.
...You think the *_Judge_* was threatened by the *_Cartels_* ???
@@nikolaikalashnikov4253 where did I say anything about the judge being threatened by cartels? I think law enforcement didn’t do a complete enough job.
@@carolynjester3847 ...No, I was asking you because I'm not familiar with this case at all... But just from some of the details of it, I think it's a very real possibility and it would explain the Judge's very odd behavior.
He fired way more than a warning there, there was a bunch of shell casings at his location outside the house where he saw the two migrants. There was another migrant witness, and no other gun was recovered. There was no evidence of any other people in their land that day.
People can protect their land from anyone, it doesn't have to be specifically people illegally crossing into the US. They just don't have to kill people based on their assumptions on their race or character.
Hi Carolyn jester. It sounds as if you're very familiar with this judge. Do you know his name by any chance?
This is why every court room should have cameras. If judges act like this knowing they are on film Imagine how they act when there is no proof of their behavior.
Immediately when the judge said 5 minutes and then now you have four minutes, made me believe the judge is extremely biased. I’m shocked. Now I want to go watch this trial!
The judge is just sitting there staring at the defense attorney, waiting to cut her off! That’s wild. How are judges allowed to get away with that? Then walking out? Wild!!!!
Absolutely disgusting behaviour from the judge.
This case should be overturned if found guilty
That was absolutely unreal.
That judge was so rude to the Defense attorney! Thanks for showing and commenting on this Peter!
I am speechless after watching this disrespectful judge.
14:01 honestly, if I’m the PROSECUTOR I’m joining in with defense counsel’s objection. any conviction is getting overturned at this point - no question.
This is infuriating! Thank goodness we have cameras to expose this type of thing.
Having Judges who do these kind of things are blackening the eyes of our Judicial system. SMH
That judge needs to be removed and sanctioned. Judge Darrow needs to teach him how to be a judge!
I dont think you can be removed and sanctioned cause who cares abt the sanctioning if you been fired. Haha
The only two trials I've seen with Judge Darrow were Darryl Brooks, and that Jessie woman who poisoned her "friend" with eye drops. She was great in the eye drop murder trial, but she had absolutely zero control over her courtroom during the Darryl Brooks trial. He pretty much did and said whatever he wanted to, he spoke to witnesses anyway he wanted, asked questions he wasn't allowed to ask witnesses, cussed and yelled at the prosecutor *and* even her! He had no respect for the judge, for the court, the witnesses, victims and their families. He banged on the table, he said things in front of the jury that the judge had already warned him not to do, etc.
I don't think that particular trial showed an example of a confident judge who's in control of their courtroom.
@@nadinekeating3255 he was his own attorney, he had way more leeway, and she had less things she could do because he was the defendant and attorney, which limits what a judge can do. Just the facts.
@@crayonwriterexactly. She would finally kick him out for a little, to show she’d reprimand him and she’s still in control. But t it was all just for the official records and basically just guaranteeing his appeals would all get denied. Shows the judge gave him any/ever opportunity to do right and he could understand that. Judge gave him all the rope in the building and he just hung himself every minute of trial
@@nadinekeating3255 But, what she did do... was protect a criminal defendant's rights. Sometimes that's paramount to looking like you have control over them. Brooks has no shot on appeal. He was afforded every opportunity to represent himself. Even the written record will show that.
Yes, she took extra time to do so. Taxpayers and family don't want a do over.
5 minutes for cross but 20 minutes for a break?
wow
Time to disbar a judge and time for him to sit in jail for 364 days for contempt of court.
Replay crew from Virginia. Would LOVE to know his reason for walking out. He needs to be removed.
You should have seen him the next day backpedaling on everything he said, and being very apologetic
“Sorry guys I was having a case of the Mondays lolzzz”
The defense lawyer has absolutely NO reason to be embarrassed by the behavior of the judge. He needs to be embarrassed.
I appreciate your anger on behalf of this attorney and her client.
Just looked it up, this guy is accused of killing an illegal migrant who was part of a group crossing via his property. His claim is that he didn't shoot the migrant but only fired warning shots when people dressed in cammo and rifles were near the house earlier in the day. It's a wild case and the state has not proven that the defense's claim, that the victim was shot and robbed by the cartel, wasn't possible.
"The defense maintains Kelly only fired warning shots into the air from his patio earlier in the day, and his wife, Wanda Kelly, testified about dialing their Border Patrol ranch liaison upon spotting two armed men dressed in camouflage and carrying rifles and backpacks walking about 100 feet from their home. "
Thank you Peter... Everyone's Jaw dropped when this happened live.. Absolutely unprofessional and should recuse himself or I'd be demanding a mistrial at this point..he's too biased.. breaks are usually 30 mins and lunch 1.5... He's been a jerk the whole trial
The prosecution should join with the defence in filing a joint motion for the recusal of the judge.
When prosecutors and judges team up to infringe defendants rights you are at a grave risk of utterly destroying the justice system.
Unbelievable!!! He should be removed from the bench!!! 😡
He was voted in to his position. In a county that is 85% Hispanic and 90% Democrat.
He should be sanctioned
@@Tinmann_77- It’s difficult to believe that such a small county is not majority Republican. But that said, there are different kinds of Democrats. Just like there are different types of Republicans, some are sane and some are acorns that worship pumpkins as their lord and savior.
@@iMatti00 Most are just sheep, following the "leader." No one can think critically for themselves anymore. Logic & reality is nonexistent in these people's minds. They are too busy being "triggered" by daily life, demanding the world coddle them because of it. It's disgusting and pathetic.
@Tinman_77 it really wouldn’t be the first time a judge was voted in based on voter ignorance OR lack of choices. Often times there is only one judge to vote in on ballots. This could be the case here.
Thanks for always defending our rights and how important they are to our free society.
Watching trials online has made me feel more responsible for researching judges in my area for elections. Wish we had more info on them when voting. Only resources I found was lawyer ratings system. So hopefully this lawyer gives feed back because we do not need this guy in office.
yikes… setting time limits on a criminal trial is almost certainly an automatic appellate smackdown. holy hell.
Appelate smackdown lol! 😆 I love the name Jillian. I was going to name my child Jillian if I had a girl, but had boys...
I’ve never seen judges in any case limit the time someone could examine a witness. They may give overall time limits, but it’s the attorney’s discretion on how they use it. Only time I’ve seen time limits used like that is during closing. It’s super bizarre. Maybe others have seen that but how it’s allowed at all
@@Rae777 yeah, i’ve seen overall time limits - but only in civil cases. I deal with them pretty frequently in my civil and work comp cases. but i’ve never once seen it in a criminal case. and certainly never limits on questioning a specific witness. the risk of 6th amend violation is way too high when it comes to placing time limits on a criminal defendant’s case. most judges have the forethought, patience, and professionalism to recognize that that risk isn’t worth the potential time saved.
@@ellybean5868 ha I definitely didn’t appreciate this name as a child, but I love it now. though I generally just go by Jill since my last name is already a doozy. gotta give people a break where I can 😂
He also blatantly punished the defendant by further restricting the cross because he didn’t like his attorney’s rebuttal. This isn’t a child getting tv time taken away, ffs! Atrocious. I literally gasped.
I saw this judge live. My first reaction was he just voided the defenses ability to get a rigorous defense.
Who is this judge?
Not only should this judge be removed but frankly, I would submit him to be reviewed by the Bar.....
Just the treatment prior to him walking out had my blood boiling and the! He walks out!
Somethings not right. ! Seems like judge is in it with the police!!! He is entitled to a fair defense and this is not that! Lawyer is Amazing and strong ! You go girl!!
Kind of like he's part of the blue line gang...
I like this lawyer ask question to the biased Judge. Great statement.
Can’t anything legally be done to this crazy judge?!
Yes, he could be disqualified under the Code of Judicial Conduct.
The worst that would happen is he will be allowed to retire and enjoy all his money and the lives he's potentially ruined in his career over his GOD mentality..
No he needs to be removed trampling over defense like this.
I feel like all his cases should be re examined asap.
Can't believe this judge and his actions. Should be up for investigation and/or sanctions. At minimum, put on record a request for disqualification.
Judges acting like jerks should not be allowed! Mistrial!!!
Who is that Judge??? He needs to lose his job!!!
Fink is his last name, he's in AZ
This is shocking he needs to be removed from the bench
Wow he was blatantly unprofessional.. good thing there’s cameras..
This is unbelievable!
This judge makes my blood boil!!!!!! 😡 This persons rights were violated and the lawyers on both sides should be furious!!
I should not have watched this just before bed. My blood is boiling and now it’s hard to calm down.
He should not be a judge. Period.
Wow! This judge is next level disrespectful.
This judge should be removed from his judgeship
This judge has repeatedly cut the defense off throughout the whole trial! It’s really sad for this defendant! He is not getting a fair trial!
Do you have a link to the trial?
@@majkolsson7192 I watched it on UA-cam. I think it’s under state of Arizona vs. Kelly
@@ramonafarnsworth2688 Thanks!
@@majkolsson7192I think he said Recovery Addict is currently covering it
@@Rae777 Yes, but from what I understood that meant more clips like this, but I might have misunderstood.
Also, my jaw hit the floor when he said, "Now it's four minutes." WTH??
Literally treating her like she's a toddler 🫨
I would have made a completely separate *_Objection_* for the separate ruling of 4 minute.
So.....what can the public do when they observe something like this?
This is unacceptable!!! point, blank, PERIOD!!
I'm not as seasoned as many here at watching trials, but I think this is THE most outrageous thing I've seen so far.
You should look up the one where the judge fought an attorney in the hall and then went back in and questioned the defendant on his desire for a speedy trial with no lawyer present
@@cortney3798 O M G - I just found it, will watch later after Peter's live is over. Thank you!!!
This is asinine to cut off the defense!
Arizona. It's not the heat, it's the stupidity.
❤ As a nurse... this behaviour would be considered insubordination or abandoning your position (post) so to speak. Absolutely disturbing to see this happen in a court of law.
The Judge also said "I'll stay in here with the lawyers." Then released the jury. THEN he walked out. So, he lied to the jury!
I'm embarrassed this is my state. I'll have to look into what happened.
I think you would be a great judge, Peter! You are so fair!
Absolutely there needs to be a motion to recuse this judge!!
Send this judge to a judicial review board!!!
I've been watching this trial. So many people with multi changing stories. Can't believe the state even brought this case and I pray George is found not guilty. As for this incident, my mind was blown when the judge up and changed the rules as to the time for testimony. Totally unfair to the defendants rights. While we didn't get to see the proffer as to why the defense needed to continue their cross, it seems he may have had a change of heart (or been shown his need for a change of heart) though. On Friday he told the jury that the trial would go on longer than expected and for however long needed.
Was probably told how inappropriate he was being and the risk of an appeal. I doubt he changed his own heart.
What trial is this?
What trial is this?
@@cathyabbott4107this is the George Kelly trial in Southern Arizona. He's a rancher whose land is on the mexican border where cartels send their drug mules across his land into the United States.
My bet is on the prosecution standing up to the judge and saying “hey, dude, you are blowing up this trial and creating the easiest appeal ever. Go eat a Snickers and then get on the bench and do judge things”
This judge is awful
I’ve never seen anything like this! Blows my mind that a judge would act like this.
Thank you, Peter, for all your hard work!
Wow! This Judge is way out of line! Shocking! 😮
Peter saying steam would've been coming out his ears if he were the defense attorney.
Also Peter just watching it: 😤
seems like he's pretty used to acting like that.
Looking at how corrupt the Supreme Court is, not sure why we trust any judge ever
Newsflash: he’s not the only judge behaving this way .. there are at least two in NYC that should be removed from the bench.
Remember Judge Gull (Delphi) she’s horrid and should be self-aware and realize that she’s biased and step down. Shes showing that she has difficulty (imo) separating her emotional feelings and making important judicial decisions.. she DENIES motions before she even reads them I’m convinced (imo)
THIS JUDGE NEEDS TO & MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE BENCH IMMEDIATELY!!!!!