would rather not be on the internet than use that companies dodgy VPN's, im a qualified network admin and can 100% tell you no VPN is secure ever your just using another persons Internet connection nothing stopping hackers stealing your just just like without a VPN, what your doing is giving the VPN everysingle bit of data you ever send over the internet while connected to them, also Nord VPN already been hacked.
You may be all Pro Digital for gaming but i think you have it wrong, I want Consoles to continue because i'm a big believer in *Physical Media*. You can say things like "whether you like it or not, consoles are the past and Cloud Gaming is the future so embrace it". I warn, with cloud gaming and everything going Digital, it increases the chance for Govt and big tech companies to increase their "Big Brother" style Data collection and constant spying and monitoring of everything we do in our daily lives. What if one day with all this woke ideology, where practically every Company today in the entertainment industry bends over backwards to DEI and ESG doctrine. We end up one day where actual "speech" and thought becomes a crime? What if we end up through the "live service" of our gaming now, where someone says something as a joke, and some SJW, woke type of person decides they're "offended" by what a person has said, when they actually havnt even said anything bad, racist or nothing; just typical online humor and banter; and that person who made a joke is reported to the Police; they either pay the person a visit because their detials are all passed on by the gaming network; or they are given somekind of Police warning, for a "thought crime", which the PC/Woke police say they now class as "hate speech", and have now put their person on a special list or record, of someone who hold potential "hate views"; and this is a record, similar to even a "criminal record"? What if we end up with something like that one day, because of all this rise in EVERYTHNG in our *entertainment* ALL being locked into one big Digital realm of the cloud and cloud gaming, connected, seamlessly integrated with Social Media? Maybe i'm thinking alittle too far ahead, but with the way the Biden Administration is pushing things regards Digital data and the internet regards "Free Speech" i wouldn't say such thing is too far-fetched. Even the EU is currently trying to clamp down on these very things regards free speech. Also one big main reason why i'm a big proponent of "Physical Media" especially when it comes to movies and games is being able to play my games ANYWHERE, ANYTIME, erm - WITHOUT the need to have to constantly be connected to the internet, and having to pay a "Subscription". Also with games, especially with how much the gaming industry has changed lately (in many ways for the worst), i could buy a game and like play it for just a couple months and be done with it; offering little to no replay value; so with Cloud Gaming, it kills off being able to take some of my old games to my local game-store and "trade" them in. Then there's the issue of "Liscening" which can always end for different companies and/or be changed, meaning games can be removed from a digital library and for any reason at all. Once cloud gaming really comes into it's own, i can see eventually home consoles becoming much like the vinyl record today. They could re-release classic games onto the cloud in the future, and could take out certain features that were there before in the original home-released version. This will only drive up the value of any "Physical Copy" of that classic game, where gamers will notice what's been removed from a digital version, and they will then desire the Original Disc "Physical" UNTOUCHED version of that specific game. No, not for me, I'm ALWAYS gonna stay a "console gamer" can say i'm missing out or stuck in the past doesn't matter to me. I want entertainment i physically OWN, that u can touch, a Library that is not at risk of being wiped or removed by corporate companies over night.
I’m actually terrified of cloud gaming taking over. It doesn’t just get rid of consoles, it’ll severely limit or even kill game preservation. Cloud gaming will allow publishers to erase any game they want from existence on a whim, games are art even if some are bad art. Even the worst of the worst deserves to be preserved, if at least as a warning.
@@makisekurisu8594 for the website? the pirate website is what you mean? if they are big enough, sooner or later they will fall any way. law is at their side not pirate.
Game preservation has had this issue for quite some time. There are lots of live service games that does not have any private servers because no one has bothered to implement them. Cloud gaming will never take over for as long as the internet in the United States has datacaps. On top of that they'd have to convince all the developers to make dumbed-down games that can be played with network latency, which for example means any title where reaction times matter are out of the picture. It's not a good proposition when you still have PCs that can run stuff locally. Cloud model also assumes that people won't get tired of the perpetual subscription model which is already becoming more and more unpopular due to costs and fragmentation.
Not to mention that cloud gaming has extreme levels of latency when it comes to competitive gameplay + Graphical blurring due to it being streamed over Wi-Fi.
The only real concern I have with the move from physical to totally digital gaming is the issue of ownership. The nice thing about my ps2 is all of the games that I bought I still have. But with all your games in the cloud, no matter how much money you pay, they could be taken away from you at any point for any reason and there's nothing you can do about it. I want to own my games, not rent them
Agree 100%... but is it because I'm 48 year old? My 19 year old son plays on PC only (even though he has an XBOX 360 and an XBOX One) and he doesn't care about physical media. To be honest, I only listen to Spotify and UA-cam. I stopped buying music long ago... I'm afraid of an all-digital future because I love collecting physical Switch games.
that's true but honestly digital gaming is really one of the best things to happen in gaming, because is way easier on casual gamers who just want to hop in a game once in a while to have a carefree easy experience because just like books you can only enjoy like 50% of your entire collection and the other 50% is just profit waiting to be made, the problem isn't digital media in my opinion the problem is that digital media cost the same amount as physical media sometimes even more which is just disgusting
Frankly. Switch for family fun. PC for proper gaming and phone for wasting time on the bus. I admit I don't care about physical media on PC or phone. For some reason I like to have the switch carts though.
The issue with this entire concept is that cloud gaming is dependent on insane Internet speeds, low latency, zero wifi connectivity (how many of your friends' consoles are hardwired?), and yet even after all of this, you STILL need hardware that can handle these things... Saying things like "TVs and Phones can do the same"... No, they can't. There's only a handful of phones in the world that can properly use cloud gaming technology as it is -- and something lost in this scenario is the amount of people in this countries notes (India, China) are *low end android phones*... if these truly are the targets for Microsoft, they are sorely mistaken. Gaming in "hardware that you already own" is not only foolish, but impossible: I have a 4 year old Sharp TV with a built-in Roku and it can hardly run the Netflix app My buddy's Samsung's TV can barely run a web browser for streaming video Apple TVs do not come with a high end GPU to do anything other than 4k streaming Nintendo and Steam have figured it out with the handhelds-with-console-capability thing, and that's awesome, but guess what? It's still dedicated hardware
My TV is litterally hooked to a computer. I can sit on my couch and game as easily as I could a console. While I don’t think cloud gaming will take off anytime soon, the ease of having a computer combo with a TV makes computer a fairly flexible and open choice for gaming in the same comfort as a console. And this is because the line between computer monitor and TV is basically disappearing as they use the same cables to receive from any “box” you want (computer, streaming box, console, etc). No longer making computer gaming something you have to do locked to a computer chair and a desk. That being said, digital games you download to a device, for the most part, don’t care what you play them on! Does it matter if I download a gamepass game from a computer box or Xbox if in both cases I did it on a box hooked to my living room TV and then played it with a controller from the comfort of my couch? I had the same experience rather I use Xbox’s box or not. That being said, I think the flexible handheld (Steamdeck, Legion G0, ROG Ally, switch 2?) will be the next gen of the “console” war. As phones will always be limited in what they can play cause they are mobile phones first. So for on the go powerhouse gaming, something less complex than a gaming laptop but not requiring a monitor/TV will remain popular for a while. Especially if said handhelds can then connect to your TV to seamlessly continue playing (cause it too can do so through they same cables everyone else is using) then that is going to be a valuable experience moving into the future. Its telling the ROG Ally, Legion GO, and SteamDeck are basically handheld gaming computers.
Every single mobile game in existence is cloud-gaming. My ancient S8 is just as good at running video games as your PS4. I'm not sure you understand how low grade the hardware in most consoles actually is. I have 20+ year old netbooks and laptops that have better hardware specs than the PS5 or XBox. The advantage that consoles have is that they are designed specifically to run video games. (And they still struggle to properly run the games BUILT for them.)
@@nobodyshome6792 PS5 runs an RX6700XT based SoC with a VRAM on godly steroids (meaning it stomps regular RX 6700XT bc of that memory). Your 20 years hardware stands no chance man. Also your S8 has power of half of my S23U with 5% battery on ultra saving mode with lower performance turned on. I think you don't quite understand how hardware works and inproves over time. Also consoles ARE NOT made to run games specifically. The games ARE MADE to run on these consoles specifically that's why they run so smoothly on them, bc you only have one specific build per generation and brand to optimize instead of infinite number of possible builds on PCs. It's like iOS vs Android optimization where you have basically all iOS devices per generation the same meanwhile there are numerous Android builds. Unrelated to the video ofc...
As a indian i agree that most people have low end phones but phones aren't the only market share. I lot of people have medium to high end pcs and laptops here
The law needs to catch up quickly to protect consumers - we are getting to the point where people do not own the game, their game data or even their privacy.
I think people just need to get used to gaming as a service, it's not going away -- but buying software outright is, whether it be apps/SaaS, games etc. From that, it naturally follows that the models around privacy and your game data evolve -- you don't take anything with you, so you don't "own" anything. On the plus-side I think we'll see an unprecedented convergence of platform availability in the tech so you can play the same titles on the go or in your lounge with pretty much the same experience, with only bandwidth being the primary limiting factor right now. The future of consumer computing generally is going back to thin clients!
@@kdallas2007 You are just accepting owning nothing mindset it seems. That is why the laws need to catch up to protect us from people who are happy owning nothing.
@@MrBashem but its true, not that i agree with that conspiritorial sentiment but its fuckin expenisve to develop software as is, buying out right isnt sustainable for small apps and businesses, what makes you think its sustainable for games that you purchase for an uninflation ajdusted 60$ when they cost literal millions to make a triple a title. Thats why every game studio now has a microtransaction cashcow because they need reocurring revenue to keep up basic rnd/development costs and salaries for their heavily abused devs. i think the dude has the right , but if you think "the law" is going to help you when america has failed to protect its citizens from facebook which stole your privacy in one way and another but used it to create military coups and meddle with elections is going to help you, then we are fucked. just capitalism doin its thing dawg- and dont think im supporting this too, i hate how unsustainable software as a medium is let alone when bitches like nintendo ruin everything with "nintendo online"
This is bad in many ways. It gives the monopolies more power over us. It will be sold to children and fools as a great step forward and then used to carry out social engineering globally for the highest bidder.
Cloud gaming is the death of what gaming is to me. Young and future generations may find joy in it, and I understand as I get older I'm less the target audience than those younger generations. It's still sad for my generation to watch something we've loved die. Collecting and owning games you love is something that ties you to the hobby and community because what you collect on your gaming journey feels like a part of you.
Also, back in the day, games shipped on media and you had to go to a store to buy them. So the quality of the game had to be at the top. These days, they ship half-made games and just say "well we will patch it later" or just leave it up to the mod community to fix. Digital gaming has been a plague and allowed developers to create dogshit code as everyone just wants to rush to get the game to market. They can afford to have a shit launch and then just fix it later.
I grew up in the transition era between physically owned games and cloud games. But I always make sure to burn any game onto a disc or flashdrive in its raw state so if my ownership of it were to ever be confiscated, I'll be safe knowing I can still play the game, without a couple of tweaks at-least. That works on PC at-least, not sure if its possible on consoles
To a person who wasn't into consoles, and was mostly about PC, I don't see consoles dying to be anything but positive - hardware tech that is so "self-isolated" and so focused on just gaming was a good idea in the past, but it is very much pointless now. A PC or a phone can give you that already, without losing everything else it has. Consoles rn are doing so many bad things to gaming, trying to claw its way out of the hole they've lead themselves into it is painful to watch. The idea that Sony pushed to isolate its playerbase away from Xboxes playerbase is just idiotic, and a perfect example how a company can, and will pursue harming business practices, even if it objectively harms players and the company itself more, just because it doesn't want to feel "suspended in the air on stilts". I've heard of many bad practices applied from both Sony and Nintendo, I don't feel sorry for them - they definitely saw that coming, yet just kept digging themselves deeper and deeper.
I understand that feeling. I still have my Game Boy Color, PS1, PS2 games and many DVDs for Windows XP. They don't do much nowadays. My current library and that of two previous generations is on Steam, with more than 100 games. And from Steam to cloud service, I honestly don't see much of a difference. If a meteor hits or a nuclear war happens, we would probably lose the Steam library anyway. Cloud gaming (without a library) may be a safer option, as long as we can store our save game locally. Anything phisical degenerates with time.
"you never owned the game" marks the biggest gaslight of a self-fulfilling prophecy the industry wants to happen and remember *if buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing*
@@Logboy2000PC game bought on steam isn’t “owned” you mean ? PC gamers have gone ‘totally digital’ years ago ! Physical media are great collectibles but digitally bought games are also “totally yours” . PC gamers have settled with this, console gamers are still insecure about this !
digitally bought games arent "yours". You own a license to the game. If the publisher, for any reason, wants to revoke that license, there's nothing you can do about it.
@@atoonontheweb physical owned games arent yours either... theyre also just a license. You can never buy "the game". Only the rights to use it. Buying the game would entitle you to rights of copy, modification, redistribution,...
Consoles won't go extinct. Not everything is going to be all digital, and all on a computer. Consoles will always serve a purpose as the less messy alternative to PCs.
@@michelletackett9489 Not when phones and computers become one and the same in the future. Phones can already run stuff like Fortnite. It's no longer that expensive when you already need to have a phone. There are also less and less games that are taking advantage of the new hardware. There will only be a few massive games that you need the latest and greatest tech for. If your phone can run %90 of the games in the future, why would you spend extra on a console?
@@michelletackett9489 Maybe right now. But we are talking about the future. That won't be the case in the future. The switch is essentially a glorified laptop, and it already runs some of the most beloved games today. The physical size needed to run games will only decrease.
“The Switch isn't a console, because reasons.” I really didn't get that part of the video. At all. Like, you didn’t say it, but are we supposed to agree that a portable console isn’t a console, or something? You know a *ton*, and I mean a TON of people (myself included) play the Switch almost exclusively in docked mode, right?
The whole video is built around this insane premise that Microsoft, who is definitely the least successful gaming company between the three manufacturers, somehow knows what the future of the industry is like better like than its competitors who are just slow to catch up. Everyone knows the real reason for Microsoft's abandonment of consoles is due to the consumer abandoning their specific console first. Nintendo Switch is a full-fledged console, whose major exclusives are outselling basically every game on the market that's not FIFA or COD, but to acknowledge that would mean having to acknowledge there's not one but two successful console manufacturers, really leaving only Microsoft as the odd one out. That doesn't really help in trying to gaslight people into believing that consoles are on the way out and that Microsoft is the genius company who is seeing it before everyone else.
A game console by definition is a computer device that plugs into a display to output video and audio in order to play games. The Switch meets that definition but just does so with extra perks. Saying that Nintendo exited the console market is complete bs. Overall the video just seems to kick Nintendo out the picture, point the nono finger at Sony, and praise Microsoft for losing?
Yeah, I can see where he's going with the argument, but we're not even close to seeing the last gasps of consoles. Cloud streaming is a cool new tech, but technology and specifically internet infrastructure is nowhere near the point that it could ever act as a replacement for a locally run game, and it won't be for a while.
Because it does console specific things. Local play with exclusive games aka nintendo games. PS5 has 2 exclusive single player games. PS5 is just a prebuilt PC without the thousands of advantages of PC and Playstation takes a loan and profits from game sales being way overpriced on console.
@@danissary Microsoft literally lost the console war, so now they are trying to end consoles just because they can't build one people want. They are trash as a company, trying to push anti consumer practices on everyone. They need to go away.
That's the kicker. That's why they always say it years away because no one wants it now, probably never will but it's a mental thing once you hear it enough you'll eventually start to believe it. At least that's what their hoping. If it's a huge flopping money pit they'll just spit out more hardware, keep talking and try again in a decade.
@@jc_malone8217 I'm not even a rural person with a sketchy connection and I'm pretty much playing 5th gen 6th gen and 7th gen consoles. I have no care for any of these new consoles. Modern gaming to me is a joke.
Bro get yourself an emulation machine and about 1tb of older games. Move on and don’t buy any new ones until stuff changes and if it doesn’t it’s been a good run. I refuse to buy games anymore I don’t care how cool they look.
@@jc_malone8217 emulation is amazing, my internet is short but there are so many great single player games, thousands of them most of us didn’t get to play growing up, forget the bs sushi squad games they’re pushing out, go play the games that made gaming great. You can get in with like a vita but I recommend any newer pc handheld a 1tb silicon power sd so for about 300 for a used lcd deck and 50 for the sd and you’re rolling.
As long as most of the world is still without reliable high-speed internet, including the United states, where our internet is not only fragmented but also fraught with data caps, then I don't see offline gaming going anywhere soon
I live in Mexico, my internet its fast, I own a PC gamer that I build, there I play a lot of games, but I have game pass too and I also play games on cloud, through my TV Samsung that have the xbox app, AND its compatible with wireless xbox controller. I prefer play in My TV with games on the cloud that in My pc, for convenience
@@leonardocamposvazquez529 Awesome. Good that you have fast internet. Carlos Slim must have installed very chingón internet connection in your area. I like to play emulators while eating tacos al pastor.
It's actually worse than movies and shows being all digital since the games cost more and you lose it if they decide to remove them. Also it will be could be harder to pirate them.
@@cfltheman remember when there was a built in feature on TVs that just let you record shows and movies for later and preserve them? No I don't, cuz I was born too late to see that.
@MrSpiritstealer I mean most people aren't replaying games that aren't multiplayer titles so it makes sense why it works for so many people. Like for me personally I haven't replayed a SP game in the last 21 years so a service like Game Pass simply makes more sense then paying $60-$70.
@@t3chfx13 That's called being a prisoner of the moment. Everybody thinks subscription services will last forever. Everybody thinks multiplayer servers will stay up forever. Everybody thinks support and updates to a game will continue forever. Spoiler alert: They don't. As soon as that happens people like you will regret not owning their games.
The Wii u might have failed but it still had many great games. I had many many great memories with it. The Wii u technology made way for the switch as well.
@DeadStawker I had so many good memories with the Nintendo Wii-U back then, and it was awesome! I had a goddamm blast with the Nintendo Wii-U and their games (such as New Super Mario Bros-U, Nintendoland, Epic Mickey 2, Super Mario 3d World, Pikmin 3, Rayman Legends, Skylanders Trap Team-Imaginators, Splatoon, Yoshi's Wooly World, and Super Smash Bros Wii-U)! But sadly though, around October 2018, I sold my Nintendo Wii-U for Xbox One X.
First, the Switch is a console. Handhelds are consoles. Portability does not define a console. I've been playing games since the Commodore 64, and the newest gaming systems I own are a Switch, Xbox One, and a gaming PC. The Wii U is my second most favorite system of all time, behind my 3DS. I still play both. What sets both of these consoles apart from the rest was their unique interfaces and the unique possibilities for play those interfaces offered. I believe consoles will exist so long as Nintendo exists. The other companies may leave the console space to seek profits from known quantities and existing technologies, but Nintendo uniquely believes the greatest value comes from innovation and presenting new ways to play. A company can't create new ways to play when it relies on interfaces that already exist, a necessity of cloud distribution. I believe Nintendo recently re-emphasized this in a recent earnings call, they said something like, we believe creating hardware to play our software is the best course forward.
I despise games that have an optimistic atmosphere like Mario. I honestly think more games should have these dark oppressive atmospheres like the coffin Andy and Leyley. I despise the fact that the only AAA company that knows what they’re doing is Nintendo, a company that makes games for all ages. That’s why I think From Software is the best gaming company we have right now. When the only universally praised studio makes games that are the antithesis of deeper meaning makes me confident that this industry is fucked.
Handheld consoles are defined as 'handheld consoles'. 'Consoles proper' are 'home consoles'. Home consoles are the default, most popular, and most powerful, with the truest ports of the games, and the largest libraries. (Other than the DS and the Switch, which is hybrid. Every other handheld console is either a gimmick or down-port of the home console. You can see this by just checking the list of handheld and home consoles, and comparing their games, hardware, and sales.) But, of course, it's true that handhelds are consoles, but we can understand why it might simply translate into 'consoles' and 'handhelds'. It's a bit like how the PS5 and PC are both gaming platforms and a kind of PC, but nobody calls the PS5 a PC -- it's a console. It's important to understand the key differences, even if they are technically the same things in certain areas or functions.
@@Jaquation You don't think Nintendo has deeper meaning, is this your stance or am I missing something? Secondly, are you claiming that you can only obtain 'deeper meaning' from 'dark, oppressive atmospheres'? What does this mean, and can you prove it? It seems to make no sense to me. The only area we can really agree on is too much optimism or profane optimism is worthless and actually a negative to meaning and life. But, I'd also say that Nintendo doesn't just make optimistic stories/settings. What I call 'transcendent hope' or 'transcendent optimism' is very important and classically common, just not in the modern age. The latest best example would be The Lord of the Rings (1954), though you might also consider Star Wars IV-VI and the Harry Potter series, and The Hobbit (1937) to lesser degrees. It's difficult and very rare in video games. I'm talking here mostly at the level of theme and story, not just atmosphere or core gameplay, etc.
@@Jaquationmy man if every game was a depressing game with dark tones you’d get burnt out from it and that extremely niche type of game would sell like shit. Bro is on his doomer arc
cloud gaming is a fad. Think of "thin PC's (they died)". CPUs will have really powerful Integrated Graphics Processors and people won't spend much on powerful PC's.@@Succer
Hypothetically, even if broadband gets to the point where the issue is negligible, game distributers would have to wait for internet servicers to distribute this, and for it to be adopted by the masses globally. It's basically putting the ball in the court of an industry with no real horse in the dog fight. For the foreseeable future, it's going to be a lot easier for gaming companies to just assemble their own hardware and distribute it.
I tried both Stadia and Shadow for over a year and even with gigabit ethernet connection they were inconsistent at best. The fact that both no longer exist says it all. Cloud gaming may be the future, but it's not here yet.
Cliud gaming can't really be better than local rendering. The laws of physics aren't changing any time soon. But for strategy games and slow games, definitely cloud gaming works.
Cliud gaming can't really be better than local rendering. The laws of physics aren't changing any time soon. But for strategy games and slow games, definitely cloud gaming works.
Cliud gaming can't really be better than local rendering. The laws of physics aren't changing any time soon. But for strategy games and slow games, definitely cloud gaming works.
Cliud gaming can't really be better than local rendering. The laws of physics aren't changing any time soon. But for strategy games and slow games, definitely cloud gaming works.
Really dude that shit died in the music industry a long time ago. Do I miss the good ol days of having a cassettes and cd's of my favorite music? Yeah. Are they ever coming back? No. Is it because the music industry is evil? Not really, if it were up to them they'd still be selling us cd's and cassette tapes.
@@dannylifted9441 Except we have mp3s. You can stick your DRM-free mp3 on your usb drive: there is your physical ownership. It's actually a far better form of physical ownership than owning casettes and cds, it's physical+digital ownership. This is what should have happened to gaming, but didn't. The only games that have this are the few DRM-free PC games that exist
You can discount the Switch as a 9th gen console if you wish, but that doesn’t take away the fact that they are eating XBox’s lunch. Failure to admit that will only continue Microsoft’s path to self destruction. This is an especially bad take on Nintendo. It’s the world’s first home console with full handheld capabilities. If that’s not a 9th gen innovation then I don’t know what is.
People are tired of subscription services though. The consumer seems to be more oriented towards ownership again. What is the use of a library of 500 games I am paying 10 dollars a month for when I realistically play 3-5 of that and can potentially never replay them once the get removed. The cloud/subscribtion model just doesn’t work for gaming.
Exactly. The limiting factor for a lot of people is time, not money. Not to mention that the majority of big games every year are still from third party publishers and will thus never be on a subscription day one. So you'll have to wait until they finally land on that subscription, if ever, and at that point you probably could've gotten it on sale for a price not too far removed from what a monthly sub costs. Games these days are far longer and can sometimes take weeks or months to get through, and that's not even looking at live service games. It's a solution to a problem that existed in the PS2/Xbox and PS3/360 era when games were 12 hours long and barely ever went on sale.
I'm sorry but I don't think you're correct about the consumer being oriented towards ownership. Newer and younger generations pretty much see gaming and media as disposable entertainment, and they don't care about ownership at all. The people that care about ownership are in their mid to late 30s and up, aka us older folks.
Steve Jobs (very ahead of his time I think we can agree), once said people don't want to rent music when he launched iTunes, they want to own the songs they love (Ive always wondered if he believed that - truthfully) Apple now sell a Spotify type service (and I bet its Apple Musics biggest money generator) Its naive not to think as games as media, and it won't follow Music and Film Media is heading online, and when the companies say this is the only way you can play it, thats the way people will play it, with grumbles yes, but only for a few years (realistically more like months), then it becomes the routine (people won't even give it a second thought) Firms like Bestbuy don't sell DVDs and Blu-rays now in store, so when mainstream companies take a stance like that, the people in the mainstream follow suit. There will be ways for diehards who still want to buy a hardcopy to do so, but it becomes niche and more expensive (hardly the way to draw the mainstream back). Disney is stopping making physical media in some parts of the world (DVDs and Blurays - Aussie from memory - might be wrong) I hear what you are saying, but there were probably cave men who grumbled about wooden huts being built etc, its called progress (and I don't wanna go back to living in caves) The gaming industry is young, its making its bow on line way earlier in its history than Newspapers, Magazines, Music, Film etc
@@richardhunter9779 What? This is younger people in general, even middle to lower middle see entertainment as disposable. They don't care about owning it.
Reminds me the conversation why PCs getting extinct because Tablets. Or why we don't need handhelds anymore, because of Smartphones. Consoles are here to stay.
As long as there are people not willing to deal with the technical issues that can arise from gaming on PC, consoles will still have a place in the market. EDIT: This may only apply to modern Triple A games, though. Indie/low-end games are sometimes easier to run on a PC (and sometimes it's the only way to play them).
@@rewpertcone8243 Especially with how greedy AMD and Nvidia are getting I have actually seen people go back to consoles once they realised a decent gpu that will last the next 3-4 years is like 500 dollars and up now. I remember when the 1060 back in 2016 would last you 4 years for $250 bucks... That's just the GPU if you want a modern motherboard platform and ram with AM5 it's even worse. I still love PC from the days when I got into Desktops in 2013 but I hate the feeling that only the rich on PC will get to play the modern releases every year at this rate.
@@BargateI love my pc, but I'm holding onto that 1080ti. I bought the water cooled version for $1200, if I wanted a 4090,it's $3500 for most cards. I cannot fathom how anyone could willingly pay that much, I refuse.
ive got a 4000 series nvidia based pc and a PS5 happy with both no doubt ill be getting a PS6 in 2027 the fact that every user is using the same hardware is a major advantage for the game developer and the gaming consumer you get dedicated software to the hardware and you also get the hardware at a much cheaper price tbh i feel like the PC is the one that will die once die shrinks come to an end after 2-3nm. Think how much a 2nm 7090 is gonna cost lol top end PC gonna be 10grand by 2030
I thought the Wii U was a great system. Just they gave it a stupid name further confusing casual gamers. Another dumb thing that they didnt capitalize on was the fact that just like the DS/3DS, the Wii U was basically a console version of these portable systems. I imagine in some other universe, the Wii U had a slot for DS/3DS cartridges. That alone would have sold systems. But Nintey does what they do best, being stingy and had us re-buy a handful of portable games through the Virtual Console. Weve had the homebrew community do with the Wii U what Nintey should have done from the beginning. Yes, through homebrew, you can play DS/3DS games on Wii U. just like you would on portables.
I personally don't believe cloud gaming will ever fully replace gaming on native hardware. I think cloud gaming will be a meaningful extension of the console or PC experience, but to say we're about to willingly play next gen games on our small phone screens instead of a large TV or monitor with all the visual bells and whistles, offline, and with no compromises is just not what I see happening. There will always be a place for gaming hardware.
@@PomuLeafEveryday Streaming games suck because even in a best case scenario there will still be latency between the time you push a button, the remote hardware receives the command, and the time it takes for the hardware to update the visuals on your screen.
@@davidaitken8503 Exactly. That all being the case, I see cloud gaming as a flexible, secondary way to play certain kinds of games while traveling or for short bursts where reaction time or visual quality aren't too important. I'll never choose to play Elden Ring or God of War, for example, where both those things would have a negative impact on my enjoyment.
I'm a PC Gamer, but I don't think that matters at all. You've really captured the subtle shift in thinking within this business, that not many folks perceive yet. Thanks for the video.
The one and only thing keeping me from selling my hardware and jumping into PC is not knowing how to gauge a PC 😑 It’s been pretty simple to understand if you want to buy a console and what you can expect from it Idk where to start if I want to get into PC gaming without fear of being ripped off and disappointed for not understanding the hardware
@drdapper1899 the biggest hurtle after the $$$ attached is understanding that your hardware isn't optimized. Sure your computer is twice as strong as a ps5 with significantly more ray accelerators, but the CPU also has an OS, and that chrome tab you forgot about, and your VPN in the background, ect, so I see a lot of people wayoverspex or way underspeck with the idea being that "it meets the minimum" or "I need it to be strong enough". In the current market pre-builds are similar in price to self made so the easiest place to start is just going to be buying a pre-built pc bit if you aren't a techy person there's a lot of extra steps after this. I went to school for jt and still find the "I don't know where to start" to ve the most painful question because even if someone helps every step you'll still second guess the second they aren't there.
@@drdapper1899 that's true, at the moment you can buy Steam Deck which is a PC handheld for console gamers. The Steam Deck might make transition easier as you might get some-what glimpse of PC software sight at least and when you are confident enough then you can try to move to PC gaming. Who knows maybe Valve will develop Steam Machine to address this problem.
The Switch IS a console. And also a handheld. It is both at the same time, and redeemed the promise that the WiiU made but didn't have powerful enough technology to pull off. My son has a Switch that never leaves its TV or dock. He uses it just like . . . a console!
The Switch sucks. The Switch is a perfect example of why consoles are in decline. Why should I buy a device that I only use a couple times in a month, at best, to play a game that's forced to be exclusive? I have a Switch, a PS5 and a PC. Guess which one I use more often? THE PC OF COURSE! I can surf the internet. I can write documents and emails. I can game. PC is as close to one-size-fits-all you can get. When the experience, graphical, framerate and aiming is inferior on a console it's not rocket science I gravitate towards my PC. Palworld proves NintenDon't needs to bring Pokemon to PC and forget exclusivity. Pokemon is actually perfect for a PC experience. I would rather play Pokemon with mouse and keyboard. A sexy curved 1440P high refresh rate monitor. The PS5 and Series X are very close to a PC with 2020 hardware. And at least there's FSR upscaling to mimic 1440p and have a consistent 60 FPS experience. But for games where I need to aim I still prefer mouse and keyboard. Which leaves the games I play on console to Souls-likes. Which I can also play on PC.
I have had a Switch since 2017 and it is docked as a console 95%+. The Switch exhibits all the other criteria of a console in that it has exclusive games, is generational and appeals to a specific market sector. In every possible way it is a console.
I am a PC gamer but when it comes to consoles I truly don't wish for it to die out, since me myself grew up with consoles and have a lot of memories from it.
@@jaxx1360 So tell us why he doesn't know what he's talking about, simply stating something with no good reasoning does little to give any weight to your words.
Cloud gaming is still pretty naff, especially out here in the sticks where 20Mb/s downloads are good. If you dont have fibre broadband or another way of getting high internet speeds then you are excluded from cloud gaming.
It's not only about fiber, it's about closeness to game servers. I played over 3g on my PC located in the same city using Steam Link and it was fine for Tomb Raider.
@@ClearGalaxies nobody wants it and the whole concept is stupid, when bandwidth won't be enough during most big holidays and you will remember the service at its worst, not when it's good, even if it's fine 95% of the time. The main issue is most people just do t want it or care and many gamers are hostile to it.
Exactly, internet speed and connectivity are huge problems all over which makes cloud gaming impossible, plus internet going out and too many people using the cloud service could really bog it down.
The consoles aren't going extinct if anything this "gen" has the rebirth of the handheld market with switch, steamdeck and other handhelds get inside the market as well PS5 is more or less matching the ps4. The only one that isnt gaining traction in the market is the xbox since Microsoft made the decision to make thier games into a subscription model.
No it isn't. It is a handheld that can be displayed on a TV. But it is not a console by the way they are standardized. That's like saying your Laptop IS a "desktop pc" because it rests on your desk and is displayed on your monitors. When it's more accurate to say it emulates the qualities of a desktop, but in terms of power and form factor both are not what they are emulating.
@@darryljack6612 a quick google can define it for you: A video game console is an electronic device that outputs a video signal or image to display a video game that can be played with a game controller.
The thing that sucks is I enjoy playing multiplayer video games with friends and family where we are all in the same room playing. It seems like with this we either need to all own a separate PC or play with random strangers online instead of my real world friends and family.
LAN party. I'll admit there was a certain charm about split screening games, but I'd much rather have an entire screen to myself, and my buddy have an entire screen to himself.
@@jaybeam1466 Except now you need multiple systems to play instead of just one. So it's more profitable for the gaming companies and more expensive for the average person.
it's always been that way, it's the same with console too. any game that doesn't have split screen literally requires 2 copies. On PC you can just torrent everything. It's exceptionally cheap considering you can just torrent everything anyway.@@shaunrosenberg4568
Back in 2013 following the poor sales of the 3DS, Vita and Wii U all the main outlets where saying consoles are going to die at the feet of Smartphones and PCs yet since then both the PS4 and Switch have gone on to sell 100+million units. Their is something nice about having a dedicate piece of gaming hardware that I feel like people completely miss in discussions.
PS5 and Series X are still expensive, but man they are way cheaper than a gaming laptop, which often costs $1000 just to be able to play games 5 years old.
Weird takes and conclusions. The Switch being more like a DS or 3DS doesn't click to me. The Switch isn't a pocketable console with unique hardware that is good for gaming in 5-15 minute bursts. It is just an Ipad where you can play console games on it. I also doubt the cloud transition will come within 15 years without the whole world investing a *lot* more into its internet infrastructure which is very costly.
Have you tried Nvidia's GeForce now? It's damn near a native experience. So, yes, in 15 years things may very well be in the cloud. just over 15 years ago, we were all still using T9 on our Nokias. Change quickly comes my friend, and innovations mean infrastructure may not be the limiting factor.
@@avalons343 They need the innovation to come up with a solution for latency and input delay. If they dont have a hack to get around it then they are limited by the infrastructure and logistics. for movie games or casual games streaming would work fine but things that actually require precise inputs will be a worse experience using streaming.
@@avalons343 I haven't. I do use Steam Link on occasion, but even then that is very limited. Most games on console or PC aren't designed to be played on the go in short bursts like GBA/DS/3DS games were. Though whenever I try to do it while on vacation (meaning an inconsistent or poor wifi connection) even turn-based games or the rare visual novel becomes a clunky experience.
Consoles are going extinct? Tell that to Nintendo... The Switch is fastest selling console of all time. The PS2 has sold more units but it was available for 13 years (The Switch has only been available for 7). If we compare sales only over a 7 period scale, The Switch comes out on top.
Loads of switch games though are having cloud play on the cartridge or making you download extra games that were not included on cart but was sold as a multi game card like ffx/ffx2 for instance you have to download X2 only X on the cartridge. It's a shame Nintendo won't do bigger carts than 64gb
That's still only one brand basically carrying the entire 8th/9th generation of consoles *single-handily.* It doesn't change the fact that Sony and Microsoft still aren't pulling their weight and need to get it together before they go under. Microsoft especially, given that Xbox is bleeding money by the minute Edit: welp, the Xbox Games Showcase just showed that Microsoft has been cooking, so it might just be Sony at this point
The indie scene is the future of gaming. In some sense indie is the future of everything. Independent news, independent movies, independent music, independent science, independent gaming, just independent thinking in how to proceed with anything. Sure it will be met with hellish resistance from huge corporations, but indie is by the people for the people, and the people always get the last say. Even today, modding is on its way to overtake what triple a studios are able make in sense of gameplay, and with the help of ai the line between huge production and indie will blur, with the exception that one option will be free in spirit and be forever. Edit: haha just saw your channel name. Yeah, indie ftw
> modding is on its way to overtake what triple a studios are able make in sense of gameplay M8 this has always been the case since the beginning of modding..
Yeah sure. Indie games always gonna be good and made by people for people. Remember apple and Google was made in garage and now it's not made by people for people. Don’t give yourself false hopes, you’ll get tired of being disappointed
@@user-channel_on_youtube you're not wrong! I was thinking of the scene as a playing field, not any specific players within it, because they will move on at some point. The tools for being independent evolve, it will make it easier for people to develop their own thing, so the flow of people to the scene will increase. Indie will expand as tools evolve. That's what excites me anyway
The reason I've shifted to pc is because it's more dynamic and the games themselves are cheaper and now console style games always come to pc. But most importantly, because I want to develop games.
I think the fact that gaming laptops with powerful GPUs are becoming more affordable has led to the rise in PC gamers as well. It's an all-in-one machine not limited to gaming. Many exclusive console titles are being released on PC as well. I haven't bought a console since selling my PS4 Pro and buying an HP Omen gaming laptop
I think its more about the fact that people are swarmed with game entertainment everywhere. The market is diluted. Oculus wasn't a thing 20 years ago. Gameboy was a side portable console people bought..now switch is a main console for many. Then you have the rising costs, low availability of the current consoles. A ps5 was selling for 1000 a few years ago from scalpers. That's insane. There are many reasons why consoles aren't the only ones making money but the market has branched out a lot and that's just the new reality of the matter.
@@DakovDakash but of cause it is!! the same goes with Smart Phones, you DO NOT get Smart by owning one, YOU NEED TO BEEEEE Smart TO USE one!!! XD hoomans...
I'd love to see a future where you can cross play most games together and the platform doesn't matter. The PC is still king tho due to the stuff you can do regarding modding and cutting edge hardware.
Sega’s Nomad and NEC’s Turbo Express both handhelds that made playing their console games portable. But yet the Turbografx 16 and Sega Genesis are still considered consoles. The Nintendo Switch is a console. It’s not a traditional handheld especially since you can hook it up to your TV.
I don’t think consoles are going anywhere, anytime soon. There is, and will continue to be a market for consoles and there are very large dollars to be made in related hardware and software sales. As long as there is demand, consoles will stick around.
Consoles and stuff like GamePass are sadly the only alternative to many when it comes to gaming. If not for Series S, I would drop video games as a hobby as PC parts before 2018 were already expensive (unified EU pricing but Eastern-South Europe wages), but after what happened after 2020 the PC gaming became a business class of entertainment.
Consoles as we have known them are done. We cherished the powerful gaming machines of yesterday that released at a very nice deal to make us buy into software but its over. That market is dead. Consoles will exist as low-end machines that crunch games at the most affordable price. Things like the Steam Deck will take a larger share of the market and publishers will rely on you to provide your own hardware because guess what? Console sales don't actually help out the leading companies in general and the chase for the most cheapest reliable console will be replaced with cloud gaming for most of the world.
The Switch is absolutely a hybrid console. And I suppose it’s success doesn’t lend well to the point of the video, but it shows that at the very least Nintendo is doing something right with their hardware
Until everyone has a fast lag free gaming experience via cloud where battery life no longer matters, there will be a console. Even then, here will be a need for a not always online gaming solution. Im more afraid of the consolidation of the gaming devs and publishers, which could kill gaming if only profit via subscription becomes the norm.
@@casrogue not quite there yet regarding streaming, playable yes, but even the best services dont have the same feeling and image quality as playing locally, and ive tried them all.
The only problem I have is too many games, not enough free time. I work in the service sector, but have a PS5, Series X, Steam Deck, and a gaming PC and about 100 games split evenly between all four. My boss has 1700+ Steam games. My point is, there's more money in the gaming industry than the entire movie and music industry combined. I'm not worried about what hardware we play on. I bought Xbox/PS5/Steam because the money is in the games and having all three allows you to shop around for a sale. The average price I pay is
we dont have the time to play because everything is a live service now a days and all games are competing with our time. I have to theoretically log into 900 platforms every day to claim my dailies, weeklies and OH i dont want to miss out on the one time cosmetics for characters i enjoy in my game thats time gated to a season pass i pay extra for! the gaming industry is a joke right now and it needs a crash, and a correction to the market place. its happening. we are witnessing it. Elden ring started it, baldurs gate 3 confirmed it, and now hell divers 2/palworld pretty much put the nail in the coffin. We are seeing mass lay offs at these humongous gaming companies. Sony straight up admitted their live service projects were ass. i have a cuople hundred hours in baldurs gate 3, and thats without being fed the FOMO that other games do to keep their play time artificially enhanced. Nintendo is doing FANTASTIC with their games, and 0 of them are live service. Sony and microsoft need a hit on their head, and im happy its finally happening.
The problem with streaming is that u need to be always online, you cant play offline, so unless they fix that issue , i dont see the idea going far and consoles disappearing
How is Switch not a console? I can dock it, put a cartridge in it, and use a controller (not the Joycons) to play it on my TV. Kinda like...a...wait for it... * * * A console.
Can you play a PS5 in a car? No? How about a Xbox Series console? No? Right. A Switch is a handheld at it's core and is limited hardware wise just like a handheld. You can put a cartridge in a DS, 3DS, Vita, Gameboy, Gameboy Color, Gameboy Advance, a PSP, a frickin Gemegear. All handhelds. Being able to use a cartridge doesn't determine if it's a console or a handheld lol. (You can use controllers and a PSP and a Vita as well and also display them to a TV.)
@@tommysixrings6026 why are both of you being dense for no reason? It's clearly both a handheld and a home console depending on the way you use it. It has two modes, its a SWITCH. Jesus christ
Consoles will never die, because there’s millions of people out there (myself included) who simply don’t want to play games on PC and prefer the console experience. Trends such as subscriptions and cloud gaming may become more prevalent but console gaming will not go away. You should also promote the survival of console gaming because it leads into game preservation and more ways to play. Really enjoy the channel, but you’re missing the mark on this one.
And there's more millions that prefer to play on mobile, there's a reason why every AAA company is trying to get into the mobile market despite them used to focus on consoles exclusively. The second someone releases a mobile phone with the same power as a console that market is over and considering how things are progressing fast I'd say it will happen sooner than later. Also most of game preservation is done on PC.
How does promoting modern consoles lead to game preservation. Most of the effort to preserve games is done as a community effort. Even if the new consoles flopped people would still try to preserve games. Look at the wii u or ps vita for an example of what a console flopping looks like. Normally companies port alot of the big games if the console it released on failed, and all the trash or hidden gems are left to collectors and the emulation community. its like how sony has rereleased god of war or ratchet and clank alot but you still cant play many ps2 games on ps5
@@Xfushion2 I don't get how everyone pushes mobile as some sort of viable competitor to console gaming let alone a replacement. Are people delusional? Do you not play video games at all and just get told stuff by investors so you have to push this narrative? AAA companies are trying to get into the mobile market because they want the whales and this is also why companies like Sony want that sweet sweet Shark Card money with their own games which is why they've invested in GaaS/Live Service console games. These mobile games are nearly always F2P microtransaction fests that prey on the mentally vulnerable and aren't very interesting if you aren't paying money in the long run. They are not making New Super Mario Brothers, Metroid Prime, Ghost of Tsushima, or Halo on phones, they are making Super Mario Run, Uncharted: Drake's Pursuit, Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp, and Halo: Spartan Assault. Massively dumbed down versions of games that are tailored specifically to mobile and have none of the charm of the actual console games that made them popular in the first place. Look at how neutered Mario Kart Tour is when playing it in controls and complexity compared to Mario Kart 8 simply because you cannot reliably perform half the stuff that makes Mario Kart good on touch controls. Square Enix releases remakes of their classic games and even original games for $8-15 but have you bought any of them? Do you even know anyone who has? Remember EA like a decade ago tried to jump into the market with BFBC2, Mirror's Edge, and Dead Space mobile games and despite them all being very solid and worth their $4 price they were all like three hours long and no one wanted to pay the $4. They also had the best control schemes that could be managed for touch screens because touch screens are one of the worst inputs for gaming with Dead Space being the only responsive shooter on the system I've seen that doesn't go completely mental at you moving your thumbs. You will never get console quality games because: A. People do not want to pay more than $1 for an app. B. Companies will design the game around mobile's limitations so say goodbye to good controls and say hello to touch controls. Assassin's Creed Jade is doing this where they could implement controller support but refuse to. C. Even if they do make a game similar to what you'd find on consoles it would be neutered due to mobile's limitations (Genshin Impact is a great example). D. Microtransactions are the primary way any of these games make money, not a single sale. A phone being as powerful as a console just means that it now has a terrible battery life and you're stuck plugged into the wall unable to use it as a phone with it heating up a lot and needing a lot of cooling like gaming phones have now yet no one is buying those.
@@soliunasmIReturns Because companies are already trying to introduce mobile devices as a console replacement? Nintendo was the one that started it all with the Switch, yeah it's not a mobile phone but it's specs are on par with high end mobile phones and some of them even surpass it. And it's main selling point it's that is *portable* aka mobile. And despite is being a _potato_ compared to the rest of the console the thing sold over 100 millions proving that a substantial amount of folk are willing to compromise quality for portability. And there's now the Steam-deck which is just a high end Switch, it's whole gimmick is that unlike it you can play _high spec games_ on it. So is not a far stretch assuming that a phone company is gonna try to develop their own phone with console-like specs in order to claim both the casual and hardcore market, as for hurdles like battery life they'll eventually be resolved. As for you pointing out that folk don't want to pay for mobile apps and thus resort to more invasive models like gacha and micro-transactions you are correct... except is not a mobile thing only, that business model it's already been implemented on both consoles and Pc games: Apex, Lol, Fortnite, Warframe. And even if the game has an initial cost is still riddled with that Bs: Diablo 4, FIFA, Destiny, Grand Theft Auto V. As for premium games not selling at full price on mobile, first of Square sells mainly *ports* of old games not remakes and the reason they don't perform well is because most folk on mobile are younger folk that don't care about an bunch of old games from the 90's and older folk that would be interested in those game already own them in a different platform. But more contemporary games like Stardew Valley, Terraria, Minecraft, Dead Cells, Geomtry Dash, Hitman Sniper and Monument Valleyare in the millions thershold. Also the main reason to own a console is exclusive games and less and less companies are willing to do them (The only exception being Nintendo) and if they do them is just a timed exclusivity.
Consoles nowadays aren't what they are used to be, unique hardware with their quirks and untapped potential which devs gets used to as the generation went on. Starting from 8th gen, consoles started to used standardised pc parts, because of that they lost the only advantage they had, Optimization. Nowadays PCs with similar specs to consoles runs games similar to it or sometimes even better due to the extra customisation options available. There is also things like productivity, steam, free multiplayer, mods, emulators that makes pc far superior and versatile than console can ever be
Man, this makes me nostalgic for the other 5 times a bunch of people said consoles were going to die out. first with handhelds, then with phones, then with tablets, then with PCs, Then with PC consoles, And now with streaming.
if you paid attention, the vid doesnt say its going to die out completely he is even convinced its going to stay, but the pivotal shift of the market is evolving to cloud and that is 100% what is happening, consoles will exist, but they will be lesser relevant
The irony is that we already had Stadia and it was like a fart in the wind. Game streaming just can’t be as reliable or consistent as running a program natively. I am however concerned with how many idiots are embracing garbage subscription services and rent their games.
what hardward did Microsoft use to serve their game for Streaming? you're right, it's using Xbox for their streaming server. Therefore, console will still be there, but, now it live in your fav Company server room instead of your living room
I remember my Atari 2600 and am blown away by how far video game graphics have come. That said, since the PlayStation 2, I haven't owned a console or played any games. I do occasionally watch gameplay videos online and enjoy it a great deal, but I can't imagine ever buying a console again or playing anything beyond a crossword puzzle game or such.
Good analysis regarding Xbox and PS. But still, people always forget Nintendo in the mix. Sony might be fkd in 10 years when every device streams games and might go 3rd party some day. But Nintendo won't give their exclusives away, and they have still the strongest physical sales (in core market Japan even more). No Mario, Donkey, Zelda, Pokemon, Metroid, Splatoon, Kirby, Yoshi and the likes to stream conveniently on your TV, only for pirates. Nintendo will save the console and the physical market for decades to come, in their very own interest.
You're fucking stupid if you think streaming will be a competitor to console... Are they taking PlayStation customers away now? Cause streaming has been around for well over a decade. PlayStation is massive and growing, PlayStation gamers have massive catalogues and are not moving
@@Luhiner With all due respect, I find the distinction to be irrelevant. The fact is the switch is a console, a fully dedicated gaming machine unlike a phone or a pc. It practically has zero competition in the handheld space since there are barely any other handheld consoles out there that aren't peripherals. The Steam Deck and the ASUS ROG come the closest but thoses are essentially portable pcs, not 'independent' (for lack of a better word) consoles with their own libraries and ecosystems. Not only that but their markets are relatively niche for now. i find it funny how people try to downplay the share by citing that most users who own a switch also use other gaming platforms, but this seems like a cope because if you were to count the switch against the playstation and the xbox in terms of sales, it absolutely dominates them.
@@Britishblue. if you look forward to the next 10-15 years I’m sure that cloud gaming will be much better. Think of the capabilities of 6g and constant optimization. Soon enough cloud gaming will be as popular as Netflix. If dedicated hardware is needed to compete then I’m sure Xbox will keep decent hardware. This is a good move for Xbox and it includes consumer needs. Most people don’t care about their physical library and would easily rather a large ever growing library of games at their disposal. Heck dude, I’m busy rn playing re2 remake on gamepass, a game I would otherwise have pay full price for. Later I might play Grounded with my friends, and then hop on Hitman 3 or Evil within 2 later. All of this for 17$ this month. This is an amazing service that I’ve been enjoying immensely.
"Nintendo should just do a sega and leave the console wars. THe gamecube sold like garbage! What the fuck is a wii? THe graphics are ASS!! Just become a third party studio like sega did and put your games on playstation and xbox! imagine mario with xbox graphics!?!?!?" - Most people in 2005 when the 360 got announced.
Literally had an internet outage from 6 pm yesterday to 1 pm today and my console was a great companion but cloud it any other internet based gaming would have been impossible so forgive me for being reluctant to believe that this is really the future when stuff like this is not uncommon
There seems to be a lot of mental gymnastics in this video and I have only watched the first few minutes. The 'history' presented in the opening is, well, let's just say 'interesting.' I am unfamiliar with this channel... is it a Nintendo fanboi channel or something? Anyway, not watching the rest.
i mean......technically theyre just pcs with a custom rom unless your an idiot its pretty obvious lol pcs are the future and the only reason nintendo is excluded from this is due to the the fact Satoru Iwata (an ex game developer) then ceo of nintendo saw xbox/ps/pc all chasing power and basically converging at the same point and veered hard left basically which is why no one sees nintendo as competition for xbox/ps.......theyre just in the corner eating glue but also making some fun games pc is bigger and better the graphics cards, the processors, the ram , everything is better and due to this ps/xbox WILL be exclusively pc and its not about IF its about WHEN and there is absolutely nothing you can do to stop it even nintendo will succumb and yes while they may take longer to do so there is no stopping this future sucks to be a fanboy hahahahahaha
you I think its better to see consoles die eventually... I thought existence of it lowered the cost of hardware but it doesnt for some reason.... I am glad to see that everyone sees the writing in the wall and ditch console for good... the idea of console never made sense in first place ... youre paying for the silicon only for gaming where you could have used it to browse internet , write code, edit videos, and everything .... Pc gaming winning is the best possible outcome where everyoe can play together and there wont be any exclusive to gatekeeping good games or holding it out on each other caused by toxic console bitches.
For me, I'm done with gaming after this generation. I really got hooked on the xbox 360 was turned off with the release of the xbox one and drm, bought a ps4 and ps5. But im hating how everything is now switching to needing to be online and how some single player games still require an online connection to play. Idk, might be because I'm getting older, have less time in the day and games don't feel the same. But I've enjoyed my time for sure, but with how everything else is going all digital - I've been purchasing as much physical media as I can before it's all phased out with 100's of streaming services
Even though Sony opened up Cross-play features, they still made it nearly impossible for gamedevs to negotiate Voice chat features to be included. The Guns of Icarus developers had to have multiple meetings with Sony, just to enable both text & voice chat for players to communicate with each other through Cross-play.
Personally a PC is all I need because it offers a wide range of games from indie to AAA and there is also the possibility of playing older games and even console emulation. But I still think that consoles aren't going anywhere anytime soon because some people prefer the simplicity of just turning on an console and jumping into the game right away. For a more casual gamer, console is definitely easier.
The pre-built and gaming laptop markets have done a lot to sway people into at least trying PC gaming. You can even get them for as low as console prices at places like Walmart or find them on the shelves of Costco. Now a lot of PC gamers can decry the quality of them (Poor part pairings pre-builts with overpowered CPUs and underpowered GPUs, underclocked CPUs on laptops to prevent overheating, cheap power supplies, etc.) but there is a market for prebuilts and laptops that have been capturing the markets a ton. Especially nowadays since a lot of people will use computers for work or recreationally, might as well get more out of them by being able to play video games on them.
@@TheOnlyBongo yes that is very true, personally I started with pre built PCs before I learned to build my own. Sure they aren't as good and the quality of parts used can be questionable but they are definitely a great starting point.
@@TheOnlyBongo Casual gamers gamers care about price. A $500 console plays AAA games at 1440p/60fps. A $500 PC/laptop from Walmart will have onboard graphic and will not even pass the minimum requirements spec to play a 5 year old game .
"Consoles are going extinct" Reality: Sony and Nintendo are breaking hardware/software records on a monthly basis and making more money than they ever have in their histories. PS5 is on pace to outsell PS4, Switch outsold the Wii...console gaming has never been in a better place. Especially when it comes to AAA gaming, aka "real gaming". PC/Mobile have more revenue because that's where most of the soulless, cash grabby, microtransaction infused garbage are. It's only Xbox that is failing as a console.... Just because Xbox is failing, doesn't mean the other 2 are. And there's zero evidence of cloud gaming replacing native hardware, Microsoft themselves have admitted that no one is really using xCloud, and Stadia, which was the best cloud service by far, is now dead. This video was poorly researched and has no basis in reality.
It's because the tech for universal cloud gaming isn't quite there yet. In another 5-10 years people will probably be more accepting of it as it advances. The main draw of cloud streaming is that you do not need to buy incredibly powerful hardware to run games at max.
Nokia was also breaking all kinds of records when the iPhone showed up. I think most console players can possibly play on the cloud, for them latency doesn't matter much anyway. Probably there would be 2 console versions, one super cheap which will connect to the cloud and do some magic for the latency to at least feel bearable and one expensive with real hardware. I don't think the cloud solution will be for all, but it is true there are some casual players who loved Stadia, so they would "love" any cloud solution.
Ps5 is not going outsell the ps4 lmfao get real. Also PC sales for games at #1 for most companies. Capcom literally makes half their revenue off PC alone. Lmao
I want consoles to stay around because having a physical copy of a game on a console is the only way to truly own a game and not just the license to play it
Let's hope indie game developers, AA game studios, and independent retail stores will save physical media of video games because indie game developers, AA game studios, and independent retail stores cares about you and listen to you.
They are already removing titles from the online game stores. You can only buy certain titles on physical media like Drive Club on the Playstation (I have a copy and it's amazing. If only Sony would bring it back with a remaster and 60 fps unlock. BTW Digital Foundry demonstrated a hacked PS5 playing it at 60 fps).
While I don't think there's anything wrong w/ the idea of physical games, there's everything wrong w/ the idea of the companies running storefronts potentially removing your ability to play a game that you purchased, if that ever happens. As long as they make it so w/ digital copies your ability to download and play the game regardless of whether or not it gets removed from being playable, then that issue should be fixed. Meanwhile w/ regards to streaming games from the cloud, I hope that we don't find ourselves at a point where that's the only option for playing games, due to the potential for connection issues w/ the server the game's being run on.
I agree with you on console gaming. I feel like gaming is going to take a new form and thing are going look different in the future; Especially with thing like cross-play. The only point which seemed weird was the idea of handhelds not being considered consoles. It felt more like a good excuse to explain away why Nintendo is the odd one out.
The reason I got a ps4 slim and a normal ps5 just because my pc cant run most games or lags alot like it…but when my first console ps4 slim came to me I was finally able to play fortnite with 60 fps, i could run wtnc 2 My ps5 just doubled it from there.
@@sahhull I have a PS5 and Xbox series S for the kids and I play too. The problem is together it was $800 for both. I don’t know anything about tech but if PC is more simple, just turn on and play right away and a lot cheaper than $800. I would definitely go to the PC store. I just never want spend that much money again.
Hand held gaming is impressive but the prices of phones that can run resident evil 4 and 8 are 2k in my country when a console that’s 500 dollars can get 60 fps 1080-1440p on the same game ,mobile games just aren’t good pricewise
good point, digital copies are ok because they can’t be taken away, but I’m not for streaming as the main vending. I believe there is a higher probability of losing access to a streaming collection if whatever service that is hosting it goes out of business or changes the policy… or anything like that than the physical media actually deteriorating in my lifetime. Additionally, the physical media is transferable to friends and family without any oversight but the streaming version of that relies on the good graces of the company to do so… unless you want to give someone your account if it’s allowed and then it’s an all or nothing situation. Basically I believe it’s important to recognize that certain rights and privileges are lost going to streaming. These companies all want people to not own anything and to pay for access so that we all pay more over the long run and don’t own anything and can’t give it to anyone. We give up a certain amount of control doing that.
You actually understand! This is exactly where the future is headed, all computer and gaming needs will be met by one powerful and small handheld device. Switch and Steam Deck (which I have) already show hints of this future.
Eventually, the smartphone will replace your console. I can already play resident evil 4 on my iPhone. Within 3 years all aaa games will have iOS ports
@@richarddukard8989 The future devices will no longer have the concept of ports. It will be one device type, one OS that can do it all. Android VS iOS, Windows VS Linux, that will no longer exist in that world. Smartphones will evolve and join with handhelds to become that device.
I believe owning physical copies of games (or downloading them) is always necessary. Alot of the consoles I have games are downloaded on them just in case the disk stops working tbh
I don't think Xbox will actually leave the console market completely. It's just that the console won't be their sole platform for games. It will be one spoke in a wheel that includes Xbox, PC, cloud gaming, mobile and occasionally other consoles, especially games with live service components. Xbox will still be their primary default GamePass platform, but they'll just keep upgrading it iteratively like a PC and I'm hoping Sony and Nintendo do the same so that we can continue to run old games on newer hardware.
I have a GameCube in my computer with PS4 controller. Is already hybrid .and I like it gives you access what you didn't have access before.hybrid gaming is the future.
I don't really play console games. But this video sounds just like the doom and gloom I heard about PC games when I was growing up. People were saying how PC games were going to die. And look at where PC games are now. I don't think the console is going anywhere.
It's not 'doom and gloom', consoles not being the main focus of game development is a good thing. PC is an inherently superior platform and we finally just witnessing that come to a head. People are realizing it is way more economical to get a PC than a console.
@@spacedaniel492What are you smoking my guy? The PS5 is literally the target platform for devs this generation. Not to mention that the majority of PC players only care about comp games like CS, Dota, LoL or Valorant. People are exaggerating the relevance of the PC way too much, without consoles gaming would be not the same. PCs, especially nowadays are not more "economical", graphics cards are absurdly priced, even long after the crypto mining hype and the majority of PC games not only cost the same as console games do nowadays, they stutter like hell.
@@nikitos3558 brother, what? you realize a ps5 costs sony something like $1000 to make? they sell at a loss. $1000 is more than enough to build a gaming pc that will last for multiple console generations. The ps5 is running on 2019 tech. I was already palying at ps5 levels back then. The few ps5 games to make it to pc a YEAR after their release on console are always better. I absolutely loved days gone on ps4. I got it day 1 on pc release, even though i beat it a few times on ps4 on multiple difficulties. The PC experience was still fresh to me. The graphics were much better, the game play was way smoother, i had WAY more than "30fps" which most consoles are locked to. To say pc gaming is irrelevant is to tell us you are an ostrich with its head in the sand. Palworld has sold millions of copies, and its not on console. Rust has millions of players. Same thing. CS:GO, same thing. If sony sold a ps5 at cost, it wouldnt sell at ALL. they need to heavily subsidize it. with $1000 in a pc, $500 on a gpu will have me gaming for generations. 500$ on a PS5 sounds great, until you realize the parts inside have been obsolete for half a decade and still cost $1000 for them to produce.
@@nikitos3558 you might wanna look at the sales of hell divers, elder ring, palworld? even sony is realizing PC is waaay bigger than whatever numbers their PS5 will ever do
Moreover, certain genres of video games, such as automation, factory, and city builder games, don't work as well on consoles but work much better on PCs, which have keyboard and mouse. Controllers just don't have enough buttons for certain genres such as automation, city builder, and factory games, although touch screen may help some.
Are they actually going extinct? They seem to be out there and are selling very well. This seems like a biased perspective not without some merits but is far from the full scope of the issue.
@TheMahayanist The revenue point seems realistic, but selling less than they've ever sold? Numbers-wise, that is incorrect. Maybe Xbox. Definitely not Nintendo or Sony. Sony is outpacing the PS4 right with the PS5 and the Switch is steamrolling all of their previous records.
@@PeteOlivaPlaystation 2 numbers sold: 158 million units. Playstation 5 numbers sold: 53 million units in a market with significantly more gamers. Consoles are dying.
@@jellyfrosh9102The PS2 only sold as much as it did due to it doubling up as a DVD player. DVD players only became accessible, financially to the wider audience around the launch of the PS2 in 2000.
@@PeteOliva PS2 Production Shipments were 117.9 million as of March 2007. 117.9 divided by 7 years (2000-2007) of sales is 16,842,857 per year. So 16.85 million consoles per year. The PS5 has sold 50 million units as of December 2023, which is 16.67 million per year averaged out. The entire game industry combined in value was 6.6 billion dollars in 2000. The industry in 2022 was valued at 97.67 billion. So it's 1372% bigger than it was in 2000 when the PS2 launched, yet the PS5 is at BEST meeting the sales figures of the PS2 from 20 years ago when the industry was less than 1/10th of the size it is now. Oh and if you adjust for inflation, the PS5 is actually cheaper than the PS2 was for the first 2 years of the PS2's life. The PS2 also had to compete with 3 other consoles, the PS5 competes with 2. Consoles are dying.
Do not let consoles or discs die. Companies salivate the day they can sell you overpriced digital games you'll never have control over, resell or lend to your friends.
consoles WON'T die cause there'll still be a market for it cause plenty of people are going to still want it, videos like this are just made to make other's worry for no true reason
I don't think consoles will die anytime soon ...look how the ps 5 sold the first 2 years it kept selling out .....they just need to make more games to keep the consoles selling....
If these consoles want to live forever and prolong their existence, here's one: Backwards Compatibility to past console generations. Imagine if you can straight up play PS1, PS2, or PS3 games onto the PS6 with additional options such as fixed antialiasing for example. It will be mindblowing and rewarding for longtime Playstation fans who are always loyal to their console products since the PS1's inception.
I have a killer PC and both current gen consoles and their previous generations. Honestly cloud gaming is cool but playing on a local machine will always be a better experience. Even hardwired in and within ft of my router/modem I do notice input lag and visual artifacts. The upside to consoles is that the interface is more laid back and easier to use on a couch setting for media and games, local multiplayer support is much better, and I’m only paying $500 instead of $1000 for a pc in the living room. Size matters as well and it’s more compact
You can customize your UI on pc.... There are multiple ''gaming interfaces'' available Also check out rainmeter and docking software.... And you can get a decent PC for 500$ if you know how. I've bought entire builds for 5$ second-hand multiple times with some older hardware. But hey if you can score a PSU and some RAM, a HDD for5$ then all you really need is a 50-100$ GPU. Point is it can be done on the cheap you just gotta look for some deals
@@RobotronSage Dude nobody spends so much time of their life for that apart from some nerds let's be real. Would you rather spend 2 months configuring some fake-console UI, trying to find some good deals of hardware and then building all of that up yourself for 500$ or just go to your local store and buy a 500$ console which is going to work smooth as butter and have perfect graphics for 95% of people. One takes you days, weeks or months. The other takes you 15 minutes to the store and 10 minutes to set everything up. I value my time more than I value my money. And if gaming is a secondary hobby for me then the console is by far the best choice.
@@RobotronSage brother i would never tell people to just go and build a pc for the cheap. we can do that cuz we know where to look and are nerds. my cousin aint gonna bother with that sort of shit. consoles are a nice convenient way to get people to play games that otherwise wouldnt. My cousin loves him some call of duty, and i can play with him because of cross play. Otherwise, he wouldnt play video games at all, nobody got time to be building pc and searching for parts. I do, and i enjoy it, but thats not the normal case.
There's a couple things keeping me on console, and the main one is physical games. I can go out and buy a game, new or second hand, and it's mine until either the disc or console breaks. That's all I care about.
i am *very* satisfied with my PS5 right now. cant say i ever really cared for market trends either... the games that care about being good games never really needed massive media markets backing them to be made
Honestly the PS5 exclusive library just isn't worth it imo It's practically a big waste of time, you'd be better off just getting a strong enough PC instead.
@@Crashed131963 STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC Computer,Intel Core I7 3.4 GHz up to 3.9 GHz,Radeon RX 580 8G GDDR5,16G RAM,512G SSD,WiFi,Bluetooth 5.0,RGB Fanx6,RGB Keyboard&Mouse&Mouse Pad,RGB BT Sound Bar,W10H64 For $450 Having a blast with this so far!
I stopped owning consoles after PS2, and switched entirely to PC. But it's really fascinating learning the history. Huge props to the editors and the narrator, great content!
Same bro, but I’ve always wanted to buy PS3 only to play some games that only exists in PS3 and nothing else and wanted to play it for so long.. that’s only reason I want to buy it or I might as well buy PS5 since it’s could probably run all the games, but Pc will be the best because it’s easier and you can install a lot of mods for every game and the only problem is lag
@@Omega-jg4oq cant you just have a ps3 emulator if you really want those games? but if you dont want to go that route, a ps3 would still be a better bet for you than a ps5 if you just want to try a few and only on ps3 games. if you want to explore more then def ps5
@@ripewatermelonlol I don’t even know how PS5 even works and my brother was planning to buy it for me, but PS3 Emulator? You think I haven’t tried that yet.. I had ton of problems make PS3 Emulator run and I’ve watched bunch of tutorials and guides but there’s always lag and crashes and sound breaking and the game running at 10 to 20 fps and even some texture issues.. but PS2 Emulator and Wii Dolphin Emulator are working quite well, hell.. I can even make PS2 emulator run smoothly in my own phone which it is aether Sx2 I think and the games works quite good which it is crazy because I never imagined that Phone will be capable of that and they are lucky that PS2 is already limited hardware doesn’t require a lot of stuff and it’s pretty old
I don’t buy this argument that the Switch is somehow not a console because it’s playable as both an handheld and on a TV. Handheld consoles are still consoles. This smacks of elitism and really doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.
I think it's complete hyperbole to say they are going extinct, consoles still have much higher player counts than PCs because of their high power for a good price and their convenience, and I say this as a PC player. And the conclusion that cloud gaming will take over consoles seems logical, but I disagree. I think there will always be a chunk of peoplebthat prefer natively running their games so they can play offline or avoid paying *subscriptions*
@@SkylineCypher I won’t even be buying any new games. I have plenty of old emulation to play and being an adult I don’t have time to even do that most days. You get people who are into the game and pay to win is introduced anyone who wants to even compete online will be dropping loads of money. Look at the old star wars game, it was pay to win and if you didn’t you just get nukes every game, the company makes the game not enjoyable unless you’re sinking endless cash into it and I’m done with any of that or the game companies that do this.
That's because people intuitively know these are among the final physical media consoles, perhaps ever. We're all getting what we can before we are forced to not own anything.
People really seem to believe that Microsoft's eventual failure in the console space after having their 15 minutes of fame with the 360 somehow applies to console gaming in general. Completely delusional. Nintendo especially can probably sustain a platform almost entirely off of their first party output, so as long as they never put it on PC or the cloud they'll keep selling console hardware.
because bro how can u keep repeating those sales the ps6 will be computer under there controll telling you what you can and cant do and still having to pay subscription to play online switch gets a pass because there hardware bad and they have the most exclusive games cant wait for switch 2
8:26 As someone who had a Wii U and an Xbox One, the Wii U gamepad looks like a mobile thing, but it was a controller and a good one at that. One thing that was commonly considered junk with the Xbox One but I used all the time was the built-in capture card.
The only reason why mobile phones are dominating the market is because-would you guess it-everybody has one. The statement "consoles are going instinct" is irrational and absurd. There has always been a market for console gaming, and console gaming will continue to appeal to its own niche of gamers who prefer their gaming experience with a gamepad on the TV screen-not to mention that first-party console-exclusive titles will also continue to be released by companies like Nintendo.
@@dispencer17Except PCs are getting expensive and it’s hard to figure out the right one. For a console you can instantly tell the games you can play. The actual game quality often just comes down to developer mistakes, not the console.
Not sure you understand what "going extinct" means. Just because there is a market does not make it viable for profit. The market will exist even if it drops below the range where making a profit off of it is possible. At some point you will still have some customers willing to pay but no providers because the cost of production means zero profit. Or the cost of consels go up to 20x cost + inflation. Would you pay 20-25k for a consol today? Also, some that would be willing wouldn't be able to afford it.
@@jacobnash9755Bruh consoles are never going to cost anywhere close to $20-25k lmao, not in our lifetime at least. And people have said this “consoles will die out soon” bs since the PS3/360/Wii era. Then they said the PS4/XB1 would be the last gen of consoles. Now here we are with the PS5 and Series X/S (and even the Switch still is doing extremely well), and there is no sign of slowing down for consoles. I know a ton of people who play on PS/Xbox primarily still (including myself) and I know people who primarily play on PC who still have a PlayStation as well to play first party games or to just casually enjoy playing classics on the couch sometimes. Same goes for Nintendo and Xbox. There is still a huge market for consoles and there will continue to be new console generations for a long time, I guarantee it.
video game presorvation is important, and game consoles are important for game presorvation, so consoles dieng out is a very bad thing we should be activly fighting as a comunity, but most gamers dont think about presorvation, and probably dont even care since older games arint theyre games.
_"game consoles is important for game presorvation"_ That couldn't be further from the truth. I used to have a repair and modding business, disc drives and discs should be seen like AAA batteries, they are ALL dying. If you think that buying physical means that you're preserving, you're dead wrong. Discs are rotting, literally (google "disc rot") and lasers have a 20 to 30 years lifespan. Also, between "day one content", day one patches, broken and unfinished games, and online requirement, there's almost nothing to preserve. Wipe your system clean, do not connect it to the internet and try to play your games and come and tell me again about preservation... I bet you that 80% of the game you think you own aren't even playable, or will be riddled with bugs. Piracy is literally our only way to preserve games. But we're 1 Carrington event away from losing it all. In other words, the current state of gaming preservation is probably around 0.001%. Game preservation is probably the biggest myth in the gaming community, along with naked Lara Croft...
your both right here about the finate life span of physical media, and yet wrong that its not important becuase of that finite life, for the very simple reason that physical media can be kept safe, guarded, while digital media is entirely vulnerable to the meddling of the companies that own it, you cant play any game a company doesint want you to if its digital only... you can only protect games form companies when theyre physical, theres no other option, exchept for piracy which can be dangerous opten inferior to the original with un intended bugs and glitches or actual malware, it can still be taken down by companies that own the ip, andnew games cant be preserved or at least will remain un protected for years untill they are leaked... if they are leaked, so yes, physical media is imperfect... and that point is entirely worthless and irelevent, your argument fails simply becuase your only responce to preservation is a big dumb worthless who cares why try at all... ridiculas, get a clue, even if you dont care, many people cherish theyre games and want to keep them for future generations to experiance.@@SLRModShop
@SLRModShop That's not a good sign for physical games!🥶 Is there any way to prevent disks from rotting like hell? Also, I hope indie game developers, AA game studios, and independent retail stores will save physical media of video games because indie game developers, AA game studios, and independent retail stores cares about you and listen to you.
But smartphones already killed not only the console market but PCs as well! Don’t you remember that the iPhone is a fully functioning PC in your pocket for the fraction of the price? /s
I like the references to Kodak/digital cameras and Blockbuster/Netflix. I've got another in the same vein. Sears and Amazon. Sears started in the railroad age with catalogs and home delivery and had the chance to go online at the start of the Internet age. They didn't and Amazon didn't take very long to practically destroy Sears. When was the last time you saw a Sears store, catalog or advertisement? Our lives are fulfilled by Amazon now. Sears already had the shipping infrastructure to stay on top of the market in the '90s and totally dropped the ball letting our friend Jeff completely take over. The whole way the Internet changed America is incredibly fascinating to me because I watched it happen and like Sears I was resistant to it, not getting an email account until 1998. But most of your viewers are probably too young for all that. Great video too, thanks.
I really hope we don’t get a streaming future. It will never be as good as console or pc, it physically cannot be as good no matter how powerful the hardware becomes. What I hope is we start getting more console pc hybrids like the old steam machines or steam deck. People want the console experience, they want decent standardized specs and they simplicity and ease of use. The solution is to make home theater pcs with simplified operating systems dedicated primarily to gaming. These could be consoles but they probably won’t have exclusivity anymore.
i think it will be better if microsoft makes an dedicated os for gaming with console like ui and controller support but that os will dupport all winfows applications😊
Get 4 months extra on a 2 year plan here: nordvpn.com/goingindie. It's risk free with Nord's 30 day money-back guarantee!
It will be difficult to play games without a console if you’re not into pc.
sponser skiped
would rather not be on the internet than use that companies dodgy VPN's, im a qualified network admin and can 100% tell you no VPN is secure ever your just using another persons Internet connection nothing stopping hackers stealing your just just like without a VPN, what your doing is giving the VPN everysingle bit of data you ever send over the internet while connected to them, also Nord VPN already been hacked.
Thanks!
You may be all Pro Digital for gaming but i think you have it wrong, I want Consoles to continue because i'm a big believer in *Physical Media*. You can say things like "whether you like it or not, consoles are the past and Cloud Gaming is the future so embrace it". I warn, with cloud gaming and everything going Digital, it increases the chance for Govt and big tech companies to increase their "Big Brother" style Data collection and constant spying and monitoring of everything we do in our daily lives.
What if one day with all this woke ideology, where practically every Company today in the entertainment industry bends over backwards to DEI and ESG doctrine. We end up one day where actual "speech" and thought becomes a crime? What if we end up through the "live service" of our gaming now, where someone says something as a joke, and some SJW, woke type of person decides they're "offended" by what a person has said, when they actually havnt even said anything bad, racist or nothing; just typical online humor and banter; and that person who made a joke is reported to the Police; they either pay the person a visit because their detials are all passed on by the gaming network; or they are given somekind of Police warning, for a "thought crime", which the PC/Woke police say they now class as "hate speech", and have now put their person on a special list or record, of someone who hold potential "hate views"; and this is a record, similar to even a "criminal record"?
What if we end up with something like that one day, because of all this rise in EVERYTHNG in our *entertainment* ALL being locked into one big Digital realm of the cloud and cloud gaming, connected, seamlessly integrated with Social Media? Maybe i'm thinking alittle too far ahead, but with the way the Biden Administration is pushing things regards Digital data and the internet regards "Free Speech" i wouldn't say such thing is too far-fetched. Even the EU is currently trying to clamp down on these very things regards free speech.
Also one big main reason why i'm a big proponent of "Physical Media" especially when it comes to movies and games is being able to play my games ANYWHERE, ANYTIME, erm - WITHOUT the need to have to constantly be connected to the internet, and having to pay a "Subscription". Also with games, especially with how much the gaming industry has changed lately (in many ways for the worst), i could buy a game and like play it for just a couple months and be done with it; offering little to no replay value; so with Cloud Gaming, it kills off being able to take some of my old games to my local game-store and "trade" them in.
Then there's the issue of "Liscening" which can always end for different companies and/or be changed, meaning games can be removed from a digital library and for any reason at all. Once cloud gaming really comes into it's own, i can see eventually home consoles becoming much like the vinyl record today. They could re-release classic games onto the cloud in the future, and could take out certain features that were there before in the original home-released version. This will only drive up the value of any "Physical Copy" of that classic game, where gamers will notice what's been removed from a digital version, and they will then desire the Original Disc "Physical" UNTOUCHED version of that specific game.
No, not for me, I'm ALWAYS gonna stay a "console gamer" can say i'm missing out or stuck in the past doesn't matter to me. I want entertainment i physically OWN, that u can touch, a Library that is not at risk of being wiped or removed by corporate companies over night.
I’m actually terrified of cloud gaming taking over. It doesn’t just get rid of consoles, it’ll severely limit or even kill game preservation. Cloud gaming will allow publishers to erase any game they want from existence on a whim, games are art even if some are bad art. Even the worst of the worst deserves to be preserved, if at least as a warning.
@@AlluringPegasu13 not everyone is tech savy enough to know how to pirate. so yeah for a lot of people piracy is not even an option.
@@Darkrezta if video game is as profitable (for the website) I don't see why it won't happen
@@makisekurisu8594 for the website? the pirate website is what you mean? if they are big enough, sooner or later they will fall any way. law is at their side not pirate.
Game preservation has had this issue for quite some time. There are lots of live service games that does not have any private servers because no one has bothered to implement them.
Cloud gaming will never take over for as long as the internet in the United States has datacaps. On top of that they'd have to convince all the developers to make dumbed-down games that can be played with network latency, which for example means any title where reaction times matter are out of the picture. It's not a good proposition when you still have PCs that can run stuff locally.
Cloud model also assumes that people won't get tired of the perpetual subscription model which is already becoming more and more unpopular due to costs and fragmentation.
Not to mention that cloud gaming has extreme levels of latency when it comes to competitive gameplay + Graphical blurring due to it being streamed over Wi-Fi.
The only real concern I have with the move from physical to totally digital gaming is the issue of ownership. The nice thing about my ps2 is all of the games that I bought I still have. But with all your games in the cloud, no matter how much money you pay, they could be taken away from you at any point for any reason and there's nothing you can do about it. I want to own my games, not rent them
Fax
Agree 100%... but is it because I'm 48 year old? My 19 year old son plays on PC only (even though he has an XBOX 360 and an XBOX One) and he doesn't care about physical media.
To be honest, I only listen to Spotify and UA-cam. I stopped buying music long ago...
I'm afraid of an all-digital future because I love collecting physical Switch games.
@@julianjuezwell im 15 and im really scared for that too lol
Nah what’s scary is digital MONEY vs CASH for literally the same reason
that's true but honestly digital gaming is really one of the best things to happen in gaming, because is way easier on casual gamers who just want to hop in a game once in a while to have a carefree easy experience because just like books you can only enjoy like 50% of your entire collection and the other 50% is just profit waiting to be made, the problem isn't digital media in my opinion the problem is that digital media cost the same amount as physical media sometimes even more which is just disgusting
The day I can't buy a console and a physical piece of media is when I just start working through my 30+ year backlog.
I had the same thought 😅
Just pirate games.
Frankly. Switch for family fun. PC for proper gaming and phone for wasting time on the bus. I admit I don't care about physical media on PC or phone. For some reason I like to have the switch carts though.
I'm already doing that.
No it isn't. You're addicted 😂
The issue with this entire concept is that cloud gaming is dependent on insane Internet speeds, low latency, zero wifi connectivity (how many of your friends' consoles are hardwired?), and yet even after all of this, you STILL need hardware that can handle these things...
Saying things like "TVs and Phones can do the same"... No, they can't. There's only a handful of phones in the world that can properly use cloud gaming technology as it is -- and something lost in this scenario is the amount of people in this countries notes (India, China) are *low end android phones*... if these truly are the targets for Microsoft, they are sorely mistaken.
Gaming in "hardware that you already own" is not only foolish, but impossible:
I have a 4 year old Sharp TV with a built-in Roku and it can hardly run the Netflix app
My buddy's Samsung's TV can barely run a web browser for streaming video
Apple TVs do not come with a high end GPU to do anything other than 4k streaming
Nintendo and Steam have figured it out with the handhelds-with-console-capability thing, and that's awesome, but guess what? It's still dedicated hardware
My TV is litterally hooked to a computer. I can sit on my couch and game as easily as I could a console. While I don’t think cloud gaming will take off anytime soon, the ease of having a computer combo with a TV makes computer a fairly flexible and open choice for gaming in the same comfort as a console.
And this is because the line between computer monitor and TV is basically disappearing as they use the same cables to receive from any “box” you want (computer, streaming box, console, etc). No longer making computer gaming something you have to do locked to a computer chair and a desk.
That being said, digital games you download to a device, for the most part, don’t care what you play them on! Does it matter if I download a gamepass game from a computer box or Xbox if in both cases I did it on a box hooked to my living room TV and then played it with a controller from the comfort of my couch? I had the same experience rather I use Xbox’s box or not.
That being said, I think the flexible handheld (Steamdeck, Legion G0, ROG Ally, switch 2?) will be the next gen of the “console” war. As phones will always be limited in what they can play cause they are mobile phones first. So for on the go powerhouse gaming, something less complex than a gaming laptop but not requiring a monitor/TV will remain popular for a while. Especially if said handhelds can then connect to your TV to seamlessly continue playing (cause it too can do so through they same cables everyone else is using) then that is going to be a valuable experience moving into the future.
Its telling the ROG Ally, Legion GO, and SteamDeck are basically handheld gaming computers.
Snapdragon 8 gen 2 mobile device is around 350$
Every single mobile game in existence is cloud-gaming.
My ancient S8 is just as good at running video games as your PS4.
I'm not sure you understand how low grade the hardware in most consoles actually is.
I have 20+ year old netbooks and laptops that have better hardware specs than the PS5 or XBox.
The advantage that consoles have is that they are designed specifically to run video games. (And they still struggle to properly run the games BUILT for them.)
@@nobodyshome6792 PS5 runs an RX6700XT based SoC with a VRAM on godly steroids (meaning it stomps regular RX 6700XT bc of that memory). Your 20 years hardware stands no chance man. Also your S8 has power of half of my S23U with 5% battery on ultra saving mode with lower performance turned on.
I think you don't quite understand how hardware works and inproves over time.
Also consoles ARE NOT made to run games specifically. The games ARE MADE to run on these consoles specifically that's why they run so smoothly on them, bc you only have one specific build per generation and brand to optimize instead of infinite number of possible builds on PCs. It's like iOS vs Android optimization where you have basically all iOS devices per generation the same meanwhile there are numerous Android builds.
Unrelated to the video ofc...
As a indian i agree that most people have low end phones but phones aren't the only market share. I lot of people have medium to high end pcs and laptops here
The law needs to catch up quickly to protect consumers - we are getting to the point where people do not own the game, their game data or even their privacy.
I think people just need to get used to gaming as a service, it's not going away -- but buying software outright is, whether it be apps/SaaS, games etc. From that, it naturally follows that the models around privacy and your game data evolve -- you don't take anything with you, so you don't "own" anything. On the plus-side I think we'll see an unprecedented convergence of platform availability in the tech so you can play the same titles on the go or in your lounge with pretty much the same experience, with only bandwidth being the primary limiting factor right now. The future of consumer computing generally is going back to thin clients!
@@kdallas2007 You are just accepting owning nothing mindset it seems. That is why the laws need to catch up to protect us from people who are happy owning nothing.
@@MrBashem but its true, not that i agree with that conspiritorial sentiment but its fuckin expenisve to develop software as is, buying out right isnt sustainable for small apps and businesses, what makes you think its sustainable for games that you purchase for an uninflation ajdusted 60$ when they cost literal millions to make a triple a title. Thats why every game studio now has a microtransaction cashcow because they need reocurring revenue to keep up basic rnd/development costs and salaries for their heavily abused devs. i think the dude has the right , but if you think "the law" is going to help you when america has failed to protect its citizens from facebook which stole your privacy in one way and another but used it to create military coups and meddle with elections is going to help you, then we are fucked. just capitalism doin its thing dawg- and dont think im supporting this too, i hate how unsustainable software as a medium is let alone when bitches like nintendo ruin everything with "nintendo online"
"you'll own nothing and be happy"
This is bad in many ways. It gives the monopolies more power over us. It will be sold to children and fools as a great step forward and then used to carry out social engineering globally for the highest bidder.
Cloud gaming is the death of what gaming is to me. Young and future generations may find joy in it, and I understand as I get older I'm less the target audience than those younger generations. It's still sad for my generation to watch something we've loved die. Collecting and owning games you love is something that ties you to the hobby and community because what you collect on your gaming journey feels like a part of you.
Also, back in the day, games shipped on media and you had to go to a store to buy them. So the quality of the game had to be at the top. These days, they ship half-made games and just say "well we will patch it later" or just leave it up to the mod community to fix. Digital gaming has been a plague and allowed developers to create dogshit code as everyone just wants to rush to get the game to market. They can afford to have a shit launch and then just fix it later.
I grew up in the transition era between physically owned games and cloud games. But I always make sure to burn any game onto a disc or flashdrive in its raw state so if my ownership of it were to ever be confiscated, I'll be safe knowing I can still play the game, without a couple of tweaks at-least. That works on PC at-least, not sure if its possible on consoles
To a person who wasn't into consoles, and was mostly about PC, I don't see consoles dying to be anything but positive - hardware tech that is so "self-isolated" and so focused on just gaming was a good idea in the past, but it is very much pointless now. A PC or a phone can give you that already, without losing everything else it has. Consoles rn are doing so many bad things to gaming, trying to claw its way out of the hole they've lead themselves into it is painful to watch.
The idea that Sony pushed to isolate its playerbase away from Xboxes playerbase is just idiotic, and a perfect example how a company can, and will pursue harming business practices, even if it objectively harms players and the company itself more, just because it doesn't want to feel "suspended in the air on stilts". I've heard of many bad practices applied from both Sony and Nintendo, I don't feel sorry for them - they definitely saw that coming, yet just kept digging themselves deeper and deeper.
"Those who don't adapt, die out"
-Some Wise Man
I understand that feeling. I still have my Game Boy Color, PS1, PS2 games and many DVDs for Windows XP. They don't do much nowadays. My current library and that of two previous generations is on Steam, with more than 100 games. And from Steam to cloud service, I honestly don't see much of a difference. If a meteor hits or a nuclear war happens, we would probably lose the Steam library anyway. Cloud gaming (without a library) may be a safer option, as long as we can store our save game locally. Anything phisical degenerates with time.
"you never owned the game" marks the biggest gaslight of a self-fulfilling prophecy the industry wants to happen
and remember
*if buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing*
That last line tho. So true
@@Logboy2000PC game bought on steam isn’t “owned” you mean ? PC gamers have gone ‘totally digital’ years ago ! Physical media are great collectibles but digitally bought games are also “totally yours” . PC gamers have settled with this, console gamers are still insecure about this !
@@TheNumbardar128My diagnosis is that you have Stockholm syndrome.
digitally bought games arent "yours". You own a license to the game. If the publisher, for any reason, wants to revoke that license, there's nothing you can do about it.
@@atoonontheweb physical owned games arent yours either... theyre also just a license. You can never buy "the game". Only the rights to use it. Buying the game would entitle you to rights of copy, modification, redistribution,...
Consoles won't go extinct. Not everything is going to be all digital, and all on a computer. Consoles will always serve a purpose as the less messy alternative to PCs.
Until PCs slowly get better and easier to use...
@@christiannoriega428 No. Pricing will be an issue.
@@michelletackett9489 Not when phones and computers become one and the same in the future. Phones can already run stuff like Fortnite. It's no longer that expensive when you already need to have a phone.
There are also less and less games that are taking advantage of the new hardware. There will only be a few massive games that you need the latest and greatest tech for. If your phone can run %90 of the games in the future, why would you spend extra on a console?
@@christiannoriega428 Cheap phones won't be able to. They would cost $900-1,100. That will be too much for a lot of people.
@@michelletackett9489 Maybe right now. But we are talking about the future. That won't be the case in the future. The switch is essentially a glorified laptop, and it already runs some of the most beloved games today. The physical size needed to run games will only decrease.
“The Switch isn't a console, because reasons.”
I really didn't get that part of the video. At all. Like, you didn’t say it, but are we supposed to agree that a portable console isn’t a console, or something? You know a *ton*, and I mean a TON of people (myself included) play the Switch almost exclusively in docked mode, right?
The whole video is built around this insane premise that Microsoft, who is definitely the least successful gaming company between the three manufacturers, somehow knows what the future of the industry is like better like than its competitors who are just slow to catch up. Everyone knows the real reason for Microsoft's abandonment of consoles is due to the consumer abandoning their specific console first.
Nintendo Switch is a full-fledged console, whose major exclusives are outselling basically every game on the market that's not FIFA or COD, but to acknowledge that would mean having to acknowledge there's not one but two successful console manufacturers, really leaving only Microsoft as the odd one out. That doesn't really help in trying to gaslight people into believing that consoles are on the way out and that Microsoft is the genius company who is seeing it before everyone else.
A game console by definition is a computer device that plugs into a display to output video and audio in order to play games.
The Switch meets that definition but just does so with extra perks. Saying that Nintendo exited the console market is complete bs.
Overall the video just seems to kick Nintendo out the picture, point the nono finger at Sony, and praise Microsoft for losing?
Yeah, I can see where he's going with the argument, but we're not even close to seeing the last gasps of consoles. Cloud streaming is a cool new tech, but technology and specifically internet infrastructure is nowhere near the point that it could ever act as a replacement for a locally run game, and it won't be for a while.
Because it does console specific things. Local play with exclusive games aka nintendo games. PS5 has 2 exclusive single player games. PS5 is just a prebuilt PC without the thousands of advantages of PC and Playstation takes a loan and profits from game sales being way overpriced on console.
@@danissary Microsoft literally lost the console war, so now they are trying to end consoles just because they can't build one people want. They are trash as a company, trying to push anti consumer practices on everyone. They need to go away.
if digital only is the future
then ill happily stick to my past
That's the kicker. That's why they always say it years away because no one wants it now, probably never will but it's a mental thing once you hear it enough you'll eventually start to believe it. At least that's what their hoping. If it's a huge flopping money pit they'll just spit out more hardware, keep talking and try again in a decade.
*If
*future, then
*I'll
*past.
@@alvallac2171🤓
It's crazy how you need constant updates and internet connection to play games nowadays anyway... It's sad
This is why I'm retro gaming. Its the biggest middle finger you can give to these companies today by playing old stuff on old hardware.
Thank You! As a rural person, with a sketchy connection, I totally agree with that.
@@jc_malone8217 I'm not even a rural person with a sketchy connection and I'm pretty much playing 5th gen 6th gen and 7th gen consoles. I have no care for any of these new consoles. Modern gaming to me is a joke.
Bro get yourself an emulation machine and about 1tb of older games. Move on and don’t buy any new ones until stuff changes and if it doesn’t it’s been a good run.
I refuse to buy games anymore I don’t care how cool they look.
@@jc_malone8217 emulation is amazing, my internet is short but there are so many great single player games, thousands of them most of us didn’t get to play growing up, forget the bs sushi squad games they’re pushing out, go play the games that made gaming great.
You can get in with like a vita but I recommend any newer pc handheld a 1tb silicon power sd so for about 300 for a used lcd deck and 50 for the sd and you’re rolling.
As long as most of the world is still without reliable high-speed internet, including the United states, where our internet is not only fragmented but also fraught with data caps, then I don't see offline gaming going anywhere soon
i agree. We arent even close to cloud only gaming
@rgm4646 Just as well, it's a big deal with the 'you'll own nothing and be happy' crowd.
I live in Mexico, my internet its fast, I own a PC gamer that I build, there I play a lot of games, but I have game pass too and I also play games on cloud, through my TV Samsung that have the xbox app, AND its compatible with wireless xbox controller. I prefer play in My TV with games on the cloud that in My pc, for convenience
@@leonardocamposvazquez529 Awesome. Good that you have fast internet. Carlos Slim must have installed very chingón internet connection in your area.
I like to play emulators while eating tacos al pastor.
@@leonardocamposvazquez529 Ok little Leon.
I'm scared of an all-digital game library. I prefer physical media. Furthermore, I also hate any subscription service.
It's actually worse than movies and shows being all digital since the games cost more and you lose it if they decide to remove them. Also it will be could be harder to pirate them.
@@cfltheman remember when there was a built in feature on TVs that just let you record shows and movies for later and preserve them?
No I don't, cuz I was born too late to see that.
Very based opinion.
@@lucemiserlohn am I wrong?
@@asherwiggin6456 No, that means I totally agree.
A era of gaming where you can’t really own ur games and its a month to month subscription horrifying
You're no longer owning as soon it's no longer Offline
I get physical copy
@MrSpiritstealer I mean most people aren't replaying games that aren't multiplayer titles so it makes sense why it works for so many people. Like for me personally I haven't replayed a SP game in the last 21 years so a service like Game Pass simply makes more sense then paying $60-$70.
@@t3chfx13 That's called being a prisoner of the moment. Everybody thinks subscription services will last forever. Everybody thinks multiplayer servers will stay up forever. Everybody thinks support and updates to a game will continue forever. Spoiler alert: They don't. As soon as that happens people like you will regret not owning their games.
Multiplayer is trash @@t3chfx13
The Wii u might have failed but it still had many great games. I had many many great memories with it. The Wii u technology made way for the switch as well.
Especially Splatoon
Man Wii U had some kickers
@DeadStawker I had so many good memories with the Nintendo Wii-U back then, and it was awesome!
I had a goddamm blast with the Nintendo Wii-U and their games (such as New Super Mario Bros-U, Nintendoland, Epic Mickey 2, Super Mario 3d World, Pikmin 3, Rayman Legends, Skylanders Trap Team-Imaginators, Splatoon, Yoshi's Wooly World, and Super Smash Bros Wii-U)!
But sadly though, around October 2018, I sold my Nintendo Wii-U for Xbox One X.
All true
WiiU is ♥️
First, the Switch is a console. Handhelds are consoles. Portability does not define a console.
I've been playing games since the Commodore 64, and the newest gaming systems I own are a Switch, Xbox One, and a gaming PC. The Wii U is my second most favorite system of all time, behind my 3DS. I still play both. What sets both of these consoles apart from the rest was their unique interfaces and the unique possibilities for play those interfaces offered.
I believe consoles will exist so long as Nintendo exists. The other companies may leave the console space to seek profits from known quantities and existing technologies, but Nintendo uniquely believes the greatest value comes from innovation and presenting new ways to play. A company can't create new ways to play when it relies on interfaces that already exist, a necessity of cloud distribution.
I believe Nintendo recently re-emphasized this in a recent earnings call, they said something like, we believe creating hardware to play our software is the best course forward.
I despise games that have an optimistic atmosphere like Mario. I honestly think more games should have these dark oppressive atmospheres like the coffin Andy and Leyley. I despise the fact that the only AAA company that knows what they’re doing is Nintendo, a company that makes games for all ages. That’s why I think From Software is the best gaming company we have right now. When the only universally praised studio makes games that are the antithesis of deeper meaning makes me confident that this industry is fucked.
Handheld consoles are defined as 'handheld consoles'. 'Consoles proper' are 'home consoles'. Home consoles are the default, most popular, and most powerful, with the truest ports of the games, and the largest libraries. (Other than the DS and the Switch, which is hybrid. Every other handheld console is either a gimmick or down-port of the home console. You can see this by just checking the list of handheld and home consoles, and comparing their games, hardware, and sales.) But, of course, it's true that handhelds are consoles, but we can understand why it might simply translate into 'consoles' and 'handhelds'. It's a bit like how the PS5 and PC are both gaming platforms and a kind of PC, but nobody calls the PS5 a PC -- it's a console. It's important to understand the key differences, even if they are technically the same things in certain areas or functions.
@@Jaquation You don't think Nintendo has deeper meaning, is this your stance or am I missing something? Secondly, are you claiming that you can only obtain 'deeper meaning' from 'dark, oppressive atmospheres'? What does this mean, and can you prove it? It seems to make no sense to me. The only area we can really agree on is too much optimism or profane optimism is worthless and actually a negative to meaning and life. But, I'd also say that Nintendo doesn't just make optimistic stories/settings. What I call 'transcendent hope' or 'transcendent optimism' is very important and classically common, just not in the modern age. The latest best example would be The Lord of the Rings (1954), though you might also consider Star Wars IV-VI and the Harry Potter series, and The Hobbit (1937) to lesser degrees. It's difficult and very rare in video games. I'm talking here mostly at the level of theme and story, not just atmosphere or core gameplay, etc.
@@Jaquationmy man if every game was a depressing game with dark tones you’d get burnt out from it and that extremely niche type of game would sell like shit. Bro is on his doomer arc
@@Jaquation Are you seriously this incapable of handling optimism? Good god
The problem with cloud gaming is it bad input lag, which i don't see ever being resolve, streaming always has the latency issues
Exactly. Especially competitive games. Who would ever play a fighting game through the cloud?
cloud gaming is a fad. Think of "thin PC's (they died)". CPUs will have really powerful Integrated Graphics Processors and people won't spend much on powerful PC's.@@Succer
Hypothetically, even if broadband gets to the point where the issue is negligible, game distributers would have to wait for internet servicers to distribute this, and for it to be adopted by the masses globally. It's basically putting the ball in the court of an industry with no real horse in the dog fight. For the foreseeable future, it's going to be a lot easier for gaming companies to just assemble their own hardware and distribute it.
@charleslewisd1 What?
@@dieglhix i had a stroke trying to read that, you might be high
I tried both Stadia and Shadow for over a year and even with gigabit ethernet connection they were inconsistent at best. The fact that both no longer exist says it all. Cloud gaming may be the future, but it's not here yet.
The only cloud gaming left as of today is Xbox Gamepass, and somebody who tried to replicate it but still failed tho-
Cliud gaming can't really be better than local rendering.
The laws of physics aren't changing any time soon.
But for strategy games and slow games, definitely cloud gaming works.
Cliud gaming can't really be better than local rendering.
The laws of physics aren't changing any time soon.
But for strategy games and slow games, definitely cloud gaming works.
Cliud gaming can't really be better than local rendering.
The laws of physics aren't changing any time soon.
But for strategy games and slow games, definitely cloud gaming works.
Cliud gaming can't really be better than local rendering.
The laws of physics aren't changing any time soon.
But for strategy games and slow games, definitely cloud gaming works.
What I worry about is preservation and ownership of video games.
Really dude that shit died in the music industry a long time ago. Do I miss the good ol days of having a cassettes and cd's of my favorite music? Yeah. Are they ever coming back? No. Is it because the music industry is evil? Not really, if it were up to them they'd still be selling us cd's and cassette tapes.
@@dannylifted9441 music is not the same as videogames.
@@dannylifted9441 Except we have mp3s. You can stick your DRM-free mp3 on your usb drive: there is your physical ownership. It's actually a far better form of physical ownership than owning casettes and cds, it's physical+digital ownership. This is what should have happened to gaming, but didn't. The only games that have this are the few DRM-free PC games that exist
@@evdestroy4121 50/50
Same
You can discount the Switch as a 9th gen console if you wish, but that doesn’t take away the fact that they are eating XBox’s lunch. Failure to admit that will only continue Microsoft’s path to self destruction. This is an especially bad take on Nintendo. It’s the world’s first home console with full handheld capabilities. If that’s not a 9th gen innovation then I don’t know what is.
People are tired of subscription services though. The consumer seems to be more oriented towards ownership again. What is the use of a library of 500 games I am paying 10 dollars a month for when I realistically play 3-5 of that and can potentially never replay them once the get removed. The cloud/subscribtion model just doesn’t work for gaming.
Exactly. The limiting factor for a lot of people is time, not money. Not to mention that the majority of big games every year are still from third party publishers and will thus never be on a subscription day one. So you'll have to wait until they finally land on that subscription, if ever, and at that point you probably could've gotten it on sale for a price not too far removed from what a monthly sub costs. Games these days are far longer and can sometimes take weeks or months to get through, and that's not even looking at live service games. It's a solution to a problem that existed in the PS2/Xbox and PS3/360 era when games were 12 hours long and barely ever went on sale.
I'm sorry but I don't think you're correct about the consumer being oriented towards ownership. Newer and younger generations pretty much see gaming and media as disposable entertainment, and they don't care about ownership at all. The people that care about ownership are in their mid to late 30s and up, aka us older folks.
Steve Jobs (very ahead of his time I think we can agree), once said people don't want to rent music when he launched iTunes, they want to own the songs they love (Ive always wondered if he believed that - truthfully)
Apple now sell a Spotify type service (and I bet its Apple Musics biggest money generator)
Its naive not to think as games as media, and it won't follow Music and Film
Media is heading online, and when the companies say this is the only way you can play it, thats the way people will play it, with grumbles yes, but only for a few years (realistically more like months), then it becomes the routine (people won't even give it a second thought)
Firms like Bestbuy don't sell DVDs and Blu-rays now in store, so when mainstream companies take a stance like that, the people in the mainstream follow suit. There will be ways for diehards who still want to buy a hardcopy to do so, but it becomes niche and more expensive (hardly the way to draw the mainstream back). Disney is stopping making physical media in some parts of the world (DVDs and Blurays - Aussie from memory - might be wrong)
I hear what you are saying, but there were probably cave men who grumbled about wooden huts being built etc, its called progress (and I don't wanna go back to living in caves)
The gaming industry is young, its making its bow on line way earlier in its history than Newspapers, Magazines, Music, Film etc
@@crystalwater505 Aka the people with money and authority over children.
@@richardhunter9779 What? This is younger people in general, even middle to lower middle see entertainment as disposable. They don't care about owning it.
Reminds me the conversation why PCs getting extinct because Tablets. Or why we don't need handhelds anymore, because of Smartphones.
Consoles are here to stay.
As long as there are people not willing to deal with the technical issues that can arise from gaming on PC, consoles will still have a place in the market.
EDIT: This may only apply to modern Triple A games, though. Indie/low-end games are sometimes easier to run on a PC (and sometimes it's the only way to play them).
@@ConcavePgonsthe price of pcs is the main factor
@@rewpertcone8243 Especially with how greedy AMD and Nvidia are getting I have actually seen people go back to consoles once they realised a decent gpu that will last the next 3-4 years is like 500 dollars and up now. I remember when the 1060 back in 2016 would last you 4 years for $250 bucks... That's just the GPU if you want a modern motherboard platform and ram with AM5 it's even worse. I still love PC from the days when I got into Desktops in 2013 but I hate the feeling that only the rich on PC will get to play the modern releases every year at this rate.
@@BargateI love my pc, but I'm holding onto that 1080ti. I bought the water cooled version for $1200, if I wanted a 4090,it's $3500 for most cards. I cannot fathom how anyone could willingly pay that much, I refuse.
ive got a 4000 series nvidia based pc and a PS5 happy with both no doubt ill be getting a PS6 in 2027
the fact that every user is using the same hardware is a major advantage for the game developer and the gaming consumer
you get dedicated software to the hardware and you also get the hardware at a much cheaper price
tbh i feel like the PC is the one that will die once die shrinks come to an end after 2-3nm.
Think how much a 2nm 7090 is gonna cost lol top end PC gonna be 10grand by 2030
The Wii U actually had some great games on it, most of which were rehashed on the Nintendo Switch
Except Windwaker, Twighlight Princess, and Xenoblade Chronicles X
I thought the Wii U was a great system. Just they gave it a stupid name further confusing casual gamers. Another dumb thing that they didnt capitalize on was the fact that just like the DS/3DS, the Wii U was basically a console version of these portable systems. I imagine in some other universe, the Wii U had a slot for DS/3DS cartridges. That alone would have sold systems. But Nintey does what they do best, being stingy and had us re-buy a handful of portable games through the Virtual Console. Weve had the homebrew community do with the Wii U what Nintey should have done from the beginning. Yes, through homebrew, you can play DS/3DS games on Wii U. just like you would on portables.
@@foyo5497 Yeah, the ability to play DS/3DS cartridges probably would have been a game changer.
I personally don't believe cloud gaming will ever fully replace gaming on native hardware. I think cloud gaming will be a meaningful extension of the console or PC experience, but to say we're about to willingly play next gen games on our small phone screens instead of a large TV or monitor with all the visual bells and whistles, offline, and with no compromises is just not what I see happening. There will always be a place for gaming hardware.
You can display your cell phone display on your TV.
Or since our TVs are now Smart TVs, just stream the games directly to your TV. Why even have a console?
@@PomuLeafEveryday You missed the point about offline and with no visual or latency compromises.
@@PomuLeafEveryday Streaming games suck because even in a best case scenario there will still be latency between the time you push a button, the remote hardware receives the command, and the time it takes for the hardware to update the visuals on your screen.
@@davidaitken8503 Exactly. That all being the case, I see cloud gaming as a flexible, secondary way to play certain kinds of games while traveling or for short bursts where reaction time or visual quality aren't too important. I'll never choose to play Elden Ring or God of War, for example, where both those things would have a negative impact on my enjoyment.
I'm a PC Gamer, but I don't think that matters at all. You've really captured the subtle shift in thinking within this business, that not many folks perceive yet. Thanks for the video.
The one and only thing keeping me from selling my hardware and jumping into PC is not knowing how to gauge a PC 😑
It’s been pretty simple to understand if you want to buy a console and what you can expect from it
Idk where to start if I want to get into PC gaming without fear of being ripped off and disappointed for not understanding the hardware
same
@drdapper1899 the biggest hurtle after the $$$ attached is understanding that your hardware isn't optimized. Sure your computer is twice as strong as a ps5 with significantly more ray accelerators, but the CPU also has an OS, and that chrome tab you forgot about, and your VPN in the background, ect, so I see a lot of people wayoverspex or way underspeck with the idea being that "it meets the minimum" or "I need it to be strong enough". In the current market pre-builds are similar in price to self made so the easiest place to start is just going to be buying a pre-built pc bit if you aren't a techy person there's a lot of extra steps after this. I went to school for jt and still find the "I don't know where to start" to ve the most painful question because even if someone helps every step you'll still second guess the second they aren't there.
@@drdapper1899 that's true, at the moment you can buy Steam Deck which is a PC handheld for console gamers. The Steam Deck might make transition easier as you might get some-what glimpse of PC software sight at least and when you are confident enough then you can try to move to PC gaming. Who knows maybe Valve will develop Steam Machine to address this problem.
@@drdapper1899Start with a Steamdeck, ROG Ally, Legion Go, or the MSI Claw that's about to come out
The Switch IS a console. And also a handheld. It is both at the same time, and redeemed the promise that the WiiU made but didn't have powerful enough technology to pull off. My son has a Switch that never leaves its TV or dock. He uses it just like . . . a console!
The switch is saving consoles
The Switch sucks. The Switch is a perfect example of why consoles are in decline. Why should I buy a device that I only use a couple times in a month, at best, to play a game that's forced to be exclusive? I have a Switch, a PS5 and a PC. Guess which one I use more often? THE PC OF COURSE! I can surf the internet. I can write documents and emails. I can game. PC is as close to one-size-fits-all you can get.
When the experience, graphical, framerate and aiming is inferior on a console it's not rocket science I gravitate towards my PC. Palworld proves NintenDon't needs to bring Pokemon to PC and forget exclusivity. Pokemon is actually perfect for a PC experience. I would rather play Pokemon with mouse and keyboard. A sexy curved 1440P high refresh rate monitor.
The PS5 and Series X are very close to a PC with 2020 hardware. And at least there's FSR upscaling to mimic 1440p and have a consistent 60 FPS experience. But for games where I need to aim I still prefer mouse and keyboard. Which leaves the games I play on console to Souls-likes. Which I can also play on PC.
@@noobbotgaming2173 some people have lives and like to go out
Totally agree.....I never use the Switch as a handheld, never ever and the creator saying that it's excluded from his argument is disingenuous....
@@noobbotgaming2173You can connect a mouse and keyboard to a ps5
I have had a Switch since 2017 and it is docked as a console 95%+. The Switch exhibits all the other criteria of a console in that it has exclusive games, is generational and appeals to a specific market sector. In every possible way it is a console.
is the switch still worth it for exclusive games and couch co op ?
Yes but the Switch completely demolishes this video’s argument so it doesn’t count.
This is some egregious historical revisionism, absolutely insane.
How?
I am a PC gamer but when it comes to consoles I truly don't wish for it to die out, since me myself grew up with consoles and have a lot of memories from it.
They’re not dying out the guy who made this video doesn’t know what he’s talking about
@@jaxx1360did you even watch the video?
@fausthanos08 did you?
@@linkvegeta2 yes, i did, watched the whole video
@@jaxx1360 So tell us why he doesn't know what he's talking about, simply stating something with no good reasoning does little to give any weight to your words.
Cloud gaming is still pretty naff, especially out here in the sticks where 20Mb/s downloads are good. If you dont have fibre broadband or another way of getting high internet speeds then you are excluded from cloud gaming.
It's not only about fiber, it's about closeness to game servers. I played over 3g on my PC located in the same city using Steam Link and it was fine for Tomb Raider.
It'll always be shit
@@bryanking1428 That's simply not the case. Cloud gaming is quite acceptable under good network conditions.
@@ClearGalaxies nobody wants it and the whole concept is stupid, when bandwidth won't be enough during most big holidays and you will remember the service at its worst, not when it's good, even if it's fine 95% of the time. The main issue is most people just do t want it or care and many gamers are hostile to it.
Exactly, internet speed and connectivity are huge problems all over which makes cloud gaming impossible, plus internet going out and too many people using the cloud service could really bog it down.
The consoles aren't going extinct if anything this "gen" has the rebirth of the handheld market with switch, steamdeck and other handhelds get inside the market as well PS5 is more or less matching the ps4. The only one that isnt gaining traction in the market is the xbox since Microsoft made the decision to make thier games into a subscription model.
PS5 isn’t anywhere as popular as the PS4 was. Plus the PS4 had the better era. PlayStation gave away most of their exclusives😂
weird mental gymnastics needed to say switch is a handheld.
It's a handheld AND a console.
Defined as a hybrid console
No it isn't. It is a handheld that can be displayed on a TV. But it is not a console by the way they are standardized. That's like saying your Laptop IS a "desktop pc" because it rests on your desk and is displayed on your monitors. When it's more accurate to say it emulates the qualities of a desktop, but in terms of power and form factor both are not what they are emulating.
@@darryljack6612 No, it's functionally the same as a console, you can just play it portably as well.
Makes noo sense as to why it's not both
@@TupZZ-fe1gp So how do you describe a console?
@@darryljack6612 a quick google can define it for you: A video game console is an electronic device that outputs a video signal or image to display a video game that can be played with a game controller.
@@darryljack6612 nO iT iSnT
The thing that sucks is I enjoy playing multiplayer video games with friends and family where we are all in the same room playing. It seems like with this we either need to all own a separate PC or play with random strangers online instead of my real world friends and family.
LAN party. I'll admit there was a certain charm about split screening games, but I'd much rather have an entire screen to myself, and my buddy have an entire screen to himself.
@@jaybeam1466 Except now you need multiple systems to play instead of just one. So it's more profitable for the gaming companies and more expensive for the average person.
You don't need seperate pcs all you need is 2 gamepads.....
it's always been that way, it's the same with console too. any game that doesn't have split screen literally requires 2 copies. On PC you can just torrent everything. It's exceptionally cheap considering you can just torrent everything anyway.@@shaunrosenberg4568
@@RobotronSage Still it just means it's more expensive for the consumer.
Back in 2013 following the poor sales of the 3DS, Vita and Wii U all the main outlets where saying consoles are going to die at the feet of Smartphones and PCs yet since then both the PS4 and Switch have gone on to sell 100+million units. Their is something nice about having a dedicate piece of gaming hardware that I feel like people completely miss in discussions.
I had a Vita, and I love it, until it died, and never got another one
PS5 and Series X are still expensive, but man they are way cheaper than a gaming laptop, which often costs $1000 just to be able to play games 5 years old.
Weird takes and conclusions. The Switch being more like a DS or 3DS doesn't click to me. The Switch isn't a pocketable console with unique hardware that is good for gaming in 5-15 minute bursts. It is just an Ipad where you can play console games on it.
I also doubt the cloud transition will come within 15 years without the whole world investing a *lot* more into its internet infrastructure which is very costly.
Have you tried Nvidia's GeForce now? It's damn near a native experience. So, yes, in 15 years things may very well be in the cloud. just over 15 years ago, we were all still using T9 on our Nokias. Change quickly comes my friend, and innovations mean infrastructure may not be the limiting factor.
@@avalons343 They need the innovation to come up with a solution for latency and input delay. If they dont have a hack to get around it then they are limited by the infrastructure and logistics. for movie games or casual games streaming would work fine but things that actually require precise inputs will be a worse experience using streaming.
@@avalons343 I haven't. I do use Steam Link on occasion, but even then that is very limited. Most games on console or PC aren't designed to be played on the go in short bursts like GBA/DS/3DS games were. Though whenever I try to do it while on vacation (meaning an inconsistent or poor wifi connection) even turn-based games or the rare visual novel becomes a clunky experience.
Consoles are going extinct? Tell that to Nintendo... The Switch is fastest selling console of all time. The PS2 has sold more units but it was available for 13 years (The Switch has only been available for 7). If we compare sales only over a 7 period scale, The Switch comes out on top.
Ps5 spellings better then ps2 too
dvd player
Loads of switch games though are having cloud play on the cartridge or making you download extra games that were not included on cart but was sold as a multi game card like ffx/ffx2 for instance you have to download X2 only X on the cartridge. It's a shame Nintendo won't do bigger carts than 64gb
That's still only one brand basically carrying the entire 8th/9th generation of consoles *single-handily.* It doesn't change the fact that Sony and Microsoft still aren't pulling their weight and need to get it together before they go under. Microsoft especially, given that Xbox is bleeding money by the minute
Edit: welp, the Xbox Games Showcase just showed that Microsoft has been cooking, so it might just be Sony at this point
@@Darth001 There's like 5 switch games that do that
The indie scene is the future of gaming.
In some sense indie is the future of everything.
Independent news, independent movies, independent music, independent science, independent gaming, just independent thinking in how to proceed with anything.
Sure it will be met with hellish resistance from huge corporations, but indie is by the people for the people, and the people always get the last say.
Even today, modding is on its way to overtake what triple a studios are able make in sense of gameplay, and with the help of ai the line between huge production and indie will blur, with the exception that one option will be free in spirit and be forever.
Edit: haha just saw your channel name. Yeah, indie ftw
> modding is on its way to overtake what triple a studios are able make in sense of gameplay
M8 this has always been the case since the beginning of modding..
@@RobotronSage yeah lol the entire reason for some pc ports existing is the mod support
Yeah sure. Indie games always gonna be good and made by people for people. Remember apple and Google was made in garage and now it's not made by people for people. Don’t give yourself false hopes, you’ll get tired of being disappointed
@@user-channel_on_youtube you're not wrong! I was thinking of the scene as a playing field, not any specific players within it, because they will move on at some point.
The tools for being independent evolve, it will make it easier for people to develop their own thing, so the flow of people to the scene will increase.
Indie will expand as tools evolve.
That's what excites me anyway
agreed
The reason I've shifted to pc is because it's more dynamic and the games themselves are cheaper and now console style games always come to pc. But most importantly, because I want to develop games.
I think the fact that gaming laptops with powerful GPUs are becoming more affordable has led to the rise in PC gamers as well. It's an all-in-one machine not limited to gaming. Many exclusive console titles are being released on PC as well. I haven't bought a console since selling my PS4 Pro and buying an HP Omen gaming laptop
smart move! :)
I think its more about the fact that people are swarmed with game entertainment everywhere. The market is diluted. Oculus wasn't a thing 20 years ago. Gameboy was a side portable console people bought..now switch is a main console for many. Then you have the rising costs, low availability of the current consoles. A ps5 was selling for 1000 a few years ago from scalpers. That's insane. There are many reasons why consoles aren't the only ones making money but the market has branched out a lot and that's just the new reality of the matter.
The thing is pc is way more nerdier and harder to understand
@@DakovDakash but of cause it is!! the same goes with Smart Phones, you DO NOT get Smart by owning one, YOU NEED TO BEEEEE Smart TO USE one!!! XD hoomans...
I'd love to see a future where you can cross play most games together and the platform doesn't matter. The PC is still king tho due to the stuff you can do regarding modding and cutting edge hardware.
Saying the Switch isn't a console just because you know it's success completely dismisses your entire argument
My thoughts exactly. Just because it's portable doesn't make it a non-console.
Agree 100%
Sega’s Nomad and NEC’s Turbo Express both handhelds that made playing their console games portable. But yet the Turbografx 16 and Sega Genesis are still considered consoles. The Nintendo Switch is a console. It’s not a traditional handheld especially since you can hook it up to your TV.
A success? No, not really.
You know what is a success? PC gaming.
@@kiillabytezthe switch is wildly successful. Stop being weird.
The Playstation and Playstation 2 will be memories i cherish when i was a kid. Christmases back then were magical.
The satisfaction of having physical copies with a disc, manual, DLC codes and case artwork cannot be replaced by Cloud Gaming.
I don’t think consoles are going anywhere, anytime soon. There is, and will continue to be a market for consoles and there are very large dollars to be made in related hardware and software sales. As long as there is demand, consoles will stick around.
Consoles and stuff like GamePass are sadly the only alternative to many when it comes to gaming. If not for Series S, I would drop video games as a hobby as PC parts before 2018 were already expensive (unified EU pricing but Eastern-South Europe wages), but after what happened after 2020 the PC gaming became a business class of entertainment.
Consoles as we have known them are done. We cherished the powerful gaming machines of yesterday that released at a very nice deal to make us buy into software but its over. That market is dead. Consoles will exist as low-end machines that crunch games at the most affordable price. Things like the Steam Deck will take a larger share of the market and publishers will rely on you to provide your own hardware because guess what? Console sales don't actually help out the leading companies in general and the chase for the most cheapest reliable console will be replaced with cloud gaming for most of the world.
The Switch is absolutely a hybrid console. And I suppose it’s success doesn’t lend well to the point of the video, but it shows that at the very least Nintendo is doing something right with their hardware
Until everyone has a fast lag free gaming experience via cloud where battery life no longer matters, there will be a console. Even then, here will be a need for a not always online gaming solution. Im more afraid of the consolidation of the gaming devs and publishers, which could kill gaming if only profit via subscription becomes the norm.
Lag in only an issue for PvP games ... any other 1p game the lag is not even an issue!
@@casrogue not quite there yet regarding streaming, playable yes, but even the best services dont have the same feeling and image quality as playing locally, and ive tried them all.
All of the above is literally irrelevant to pc gaming
>gaming experience via cloud
This is actually the worst case scenario
The only problem I have is too many games, not enough free time. I work in the service sector, but have a PS5, Series X, Steam Deck, and a gaming PC and about 100 games split evenly between all four. My boss has 1700+ Steam games.
My point is, there's more money in the gaming industry than the entire movie and music industry combined. I'm not worried about what hardware we play on. I bought Xbox/PS5/Steam because the money is in the games and having all three allows you to shop around for a sale. The average price I pay is
we dont have the time to play because everything is a live service now a days and all games are competing with our time. I have to theoretically log into 900 platforms every day to claim my dailies, weeklies and OH i dont want to miss out on the one time cosmetics for characters i enjoy in my game thats time gated to a season pass i pay extra for! the gaming industry is a joke right now and it needs a crash, and a correction to the market place. its happening. we are witnessing it. Elden ring started it, baldurs gate 3 confirmed it, and now hell divers 2/palworld pretty much put the nail in the coffin. We are seeing mass lay offs at these humongous gaming companies. Sony straight up admitted their live service projects were ass. i have a cuople hundred hours in baldurs gate 3, and thats without being fed the FOMO that other games do to keep their play time artificially enhanced. Nintendo is doing FANTASTIC with their games, and 0 of them are live service. Sony and microsoft need a hit on their head, and im happy its finally happening.
The problem with streaming is that u need to be always online, you cant play offline, so unless they fix that issue , i dont see the idea going far and consoles disappearing
How is Switch not a console? I can dock it, put a cartridge in it, and use a controller (not the Joycons) to play it on my TV. Kinda like...a...wait for it...
*
*
*
A console.
Can you play a PS5 in a car? No? How about a Xbox Series console? No? Right. A Switch is a handheld at it's core and is limited hardware wise just like a handheld. You can put a cartridge in a DS, 3DS, Vita, Gameboy, Gameboy Color, Gameboy Advance, a PSP, a frickin Gemegear. All handhelds. Being able to use a cartridge doesn't determine if it's a console or a handheld lol. (You can use controllers and a PSP and a Vita as well and also display them to a TV.)
@@tommysixrings6026you actually can 😂 some guy put his ps5 in his car and played spiderman 2
You can do everything you did say with smartphones too.
@@tommysixrings6026 why are both of you being dense for no reason? It's clearly both a handheld and a home console depending on the way you use it. It has two modes, its a SWITCH. Jesus christ
A Switch is closer to a smartphone than it is a console.
Consoles will never die, because there’s millions of people out there (myself included) who simply don’t want to play games on PC and prefer the console experience. Trends such as subscriptions and cloud gaming may become more prevalent but console gaming will not go away. You should also promote the survival of console gaming because it leads into game preservation and more ways to play. Really enjoy the channel, but you’re missing the mark on this one.
what if valve make an open console (steam deck is an open console)? will you buy PS, XBOX or STEAM?
And there's more millions that prefer to play on mobile, there's a reason why every AAA company is trying to get into the mobile market despite them used to focus on consoles exclusively.
The second someone releases a mobile phone with the same power as a console that market is over and considering how things are progressing fast I'd say it will happen sooner than later.
Also most of game preservation is done on PC.
How does promoting modern consoles lead to game preservation. Most of the effort to preserve games is done as a community effort. Even if the new consoles flopped people would still try to preserve games. Look at the wii u or ps vita for an example of what a console flopping looks like. Normally companies port alot of the big games if the console it released on failed, and all the trash or hidden gems are left to collectors and the emulation community. its like how sony has rereleased god of war or ratchet and clank alot but you still cant play many ps2 games on ps5
@@Xfushion2 I don't get how everyone pushes mobile as some sort of viable competitor to console gaming let alone a replacement. Are people delusional? Do you not play video games at all and just get told stuff by investors so you have to push this narrative?
AAA companies are trying to get into the mobile market because they want the whales and this is also why companies like Sony want that sweet sweet Shark Card money with their own games which is why they've invested in GaaS/Live Service console games. These mobile games are nearly always F2P microtransaction fests that prey on the mentally vulnerable and aren't very interesting if you aren't paying money in the long run. They are not making New Super Mario Brothers, Metroid Prime, Ghost of Tsushima, or Halo on phones, they are making Super Mario Run, Uncharted: Drake's Pursuit, Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp, and Halo: Spartan Assault. Massively dumbed down versions of games that are tailored specifically to mobile and have none of the charm of the actual console games that made them popular in the first place. Look at how neutered Mario Kart Tour is when playing it in controls and complexity compared to Mario Kart 8 simply because you cannot reliably perform half the stuff that makes Mario Kart good on touch controls.
Square Enix releases remakes of their classic games and even original games for $8-15 but have you bought any of them? Do you even know anyone who has? Remember EA like a decade ago tried to jump into the market with BFBC2, Mirror's Edge, and Dead Space mobile games and despite them all being very solid and worth their $4 price they were all like three hours long and no one wanted to pay the $4. They also had the best control schemes that could be managed for touch screens because touch screens are one of the worst inputs for gaming with Dead Space being the only responsive shooter on the system I've seen that doesn't go completely mental at you moving your thumbs.
You will never get console quality games because:
A. People do not want to pay more than $1 for an app.
B. Companies will design the game around mobile's limitations so say goodbye to good controls and say hello to touch controls. Assassin's Creed Jade is doing this where they could implement controller support but refuse to.
C. Even if they do make a game similar to what you'd find on consoles it would be neutered due to mobile's limitations (Genshin Impact is a great example).
D. Microtransactions are the primary way any of these games make money, not a single sale.
A phone being as powerful as a console just means that it now has a terrible battery life and you're stuck plugged into the wall unable to use it as a phone with it heating up a lot and needing a lot of cooling like gaming phones have now yet no one is buying those.
@@soliunasmIReturns Because companies are already trying to introduce mobile devices as a console replacement?
Nintendo was the one that started it all with the Switch, yeah it's not a mobile phone but it's specs are on par with high end mobile phones and some of them even surpass it. And it's main selling point it's that is *portable* aka mobile. And despite is being a _potato_ compared to the rest of the console the thing sold over 100 millions proving that a substantial amount of folk are willing to compromise quality for portability.
And there's now the Steam-deck which is just a high end Switch, it's whole gimmick is that unlike it you can play _high spec games_ on it.
So is not a far stretch assuming that a phone company is gonna try to develop their own phone with console-like specs in order to claim both the casual and hardcore market, as for hurdles like battery life they'll eventually be resolved.
As for you pointing out that folk don't want to pay for mobile apps and thus resort to more invasive models like gacha and micro-transactions you are correct... except is not a mobile thing only, that business model it's already been implemented on both consoles and Pc games: Apex, Lol, Fortnite, Warframe. And even if the game has an initial cost is still riddled with that Bs: Diablo 4, FIFA, Destiny, Grand Theft Auto V.
As for premium games not selling at full price on mobile, first of Square sells mainly *ports* of old games not remakes and the reason they don't perform well is because most folk on mobile are younger folk that don't care about an bunch of old games from the 90's and older folk that would be interested in those game already own them in a different platform.
But more contemporary games like Stardew Valley, Terraria, Minecraft, Dead Cells, Geomtry Dash, Hitman Sniper and Monument Valleyare in the millions thershold.
Also the main reason to own a console is exclusive games and less and less companies are willing to do them (The only exception being Nintendo) and if they do them is just a timed exclusivity.
Consoles nowadays aren't what they are used to be, unique hardware with their quirks and untapped potential which devs gets used to as the generation went on. Starting from 8th gen, consoles started to used standardised pc parts, because of that they lost the only advantage they had, Optimization. Nowadays PCs with similar specs to consoles runs games similar to it or sometimes even better due to the extra customisation options available. There is also things like productivity, steam, free multiplayer, mods, emulators that makes pc far superior and versatile than console can ever be
Are there any alternative version of Steam stores?
@@keeganmcfarland7507 epic games?
@@keeganmcfarland7507 Epic Games or Gog for games with no DRM.
this has been the advantage for pc for a long time and still consoles are as strong as ever
@@Lynn.-_-. Have you heard of GOG?
Man, this makes me nostalgic for the other 5 times a bunch of people said consoles were going to die out. first with handhelds, then with phones, then with tablets, then with PCs, Then with PC consoles, And now with streaming.
if you paid attention, the vid doesnt say its going to die out completely he is even convinced its going to stay, but the pivotal shift of the market is evolving to cloud and that is 100% what is happening, consoles will exist, but they will be lesser relevant
The irony is that we already had Stadia and it was like a fart in the wind. Game streaming just can’t be as reliable or consistent as running a program natively. I am however concerned with how many idiots are embracing garbage subscription services and rent their games.
@@Hynotama exactly. The people who want consoles and play enough to spend hundreds of $ on games arent the type to bend that easily.
what hardward did Microsoft use to serve their game for Streaming?
you're right, it's using Xbox for their streaming server.
Therefore, console will still be there, but, now it live in your fav Company server room instead of your living room
I remember my Atari 2600 and am blown away by how far video game graphics have come. That said, since the PlayStation 2, I haven't owned a console or played any games. I do occasionally watch gameplay videos online and enjoy it a great deal, but I can't imagine ever buying a console again or playing anything beyond a crossword puzzle game or such.
Good analysis regarding Xbox and PS. But still, people always forget Nintendo in the mix. Sony might be fkd in 10 years when every device streams games and might go 3rd party some day. But Nintendo won't give their exclusives away, and they have still the strongest physical sales (in core market Japan even more). No Mario, Donkey, Zelda, Pokemon, Metroid, Splatoon, Kirby, Yoshi and the likes to stream conveniently on your TV, only for pirates. Nintendo will save the console and the physical market for decades to come, in their very own interest.
nintendo is a handheld console, ps and xbox home consoles will never get replaced by handheld
@ryanpatrick4920this sounds like a supervillains world domination plan, with a few good points that nobody can deny, but is ultimately flawed.😂
You're fucking stupid if you think streaming will be a competitor to console... Are they taking PlayStation customers away now? Cause streaming has been around for well over a decade.
PlayStation is massive and growing, PlayStation gamers have massive catalogues and are not moving
@@Luhiner With all due respect, I find the distinction to be irrelevant. The fact is the switch is a console, a fully dedicated gaming machine unlike a phone or a pc. It practically has zero competition in the handheld space since there are barely any other handheld consoles out there that aren't peripherals. The Steam Deck and the ASUS ROG come the closest but thoses are essentially portable pcs, not 'independent' (for lack of a better word) consoles with their own libraries and ecosystems. Not only that but their markets are relatively niche for now. i find it funny how people try to downplay the share by citing that most users who own a switch also use other gaming platforms, but this seems like a cope because if you were to count the switch against the playstation and the xbox in terms of sales, it absolutely dominates them.
@@Britishblue. if you look forward to the next 10-15 years I’m sure that cloud gaming will be much better. Think of the capabilities of 6g and constant optimization. Soon enough cloud gaming will be as popular as Netflix. If dedicated hardware is needed to compete then I’m sure Xbox will keep decent hardware. This is a good move for Xbox and it includes consumer needs. Most people don’t care about their physical library and would easily rather a large ever growing library of games at their disposal. Heck dude, I’m busy rn playing re2 remake on gamepass, a game I would otherwise have pay full price for. Later I might play Grounded with my friends, and then hop on Hitman 3 or Evil within 2 later. All of this for 17$ this month. This is an amazing service that I’ve been enjoying immensely.
Just a friendly reminder that people have been saying this since 2006.
"Nintendo should just do a sega and leave the console wars. THe gamecube sold like garbage! What the fuck is a wii? THe graphics are ASS!! Just become a third party studio like sega did and put your games on playstation and xbox! imagine mario with xbox graphics!?!?!?" - Most people in 2005 when the 360 got announced.
@@dogsbecute this is all just imagined in your head. no one said this around the time. i was there so i remember
@@spht9ng Oh they said it 100%. I remember the shitstorm around windwaker. Fucking hell.
@@RaiyanReetom huh that's news to me
So true.
Literally had an internet outage from 6 pm yesterday to 1 pm today and my console was a great companion but cloud it any other internet based gaming would have been impossible so forgive me for being reluctant to believe that this is really the future when stuff like this is not uncommon
The mental gymnastics you had to go through to say the switch is not a home console are impressive gotta admit
There seems to be a lot of mental gymnastics in this video and I have only watched the first few minutes. The 'history' presented in the opening is, well, let's just say 'interesting.' I am unfamiliar with this channel... is it a Nintendo fanboi channel or something? Anyway, not watching the rest.
@@davidc1878yes
Thanks. I was looking for a tldr comment, but I know I don't even have to watch it.
i mean......technically theyre just pcs with a custom rom unless your an idiot its pretty obvious lol pcs are the future and the only reason nintendo is excluded from this is due to the the fact Satoru Iwata (an ex game developer) then ceo of nintendo saw xbox/ps/pc all chasing power and basically converging at the same point and veered hard left basically which is why no one sees nintendo as competition for xbox/ps.......theyre just in the corner eating glue but also making some fun games
pc is bigger and better the graphics cards, the processors, the ram , everything is better and due to this ps/xbox WILL be exclusively pc and its not about IF its about WHEN and there is absolutely nothing you can do to stop it even nintendo will succumb and yes while they may take longer to do so there is no stopping this future
sucks to be a fanboy hahahahahaha
you I think its better to see consoles die eventually... I thought existence of it lowered the cost of hardware but it doesnt for some reason.... I am glad to see that everyone sees the writing in the wall and ditch console for good... the idea of console never made sense in first place ... youre paying for the silicon only for gaming where you could have used it to browse internet , write code, edit videos, and everything .... Pc gaming winning is the best possible outcome where everyoe can play together and there wont be any exclusive to gatekeeping good games or holding it out on each other caused by toxic console bitches.
For me, I'm done with gaming after this generation. I really got hooked on the xbox 360 was turned off with the release of the xbox one and drm, bought a ps4 and ps5. But im hating how everything is now switching to needing to be online and how some single player games still require an online connection to play. Idk, might be because I'm getting older, have less time in the day and games don't feel the same. But I've enjoyed my time for sure, but with how everything else is going all digital - I've been purchasing as much physical media as I can before it's all phased out with 100's of streaming services
Even though Sony opened up Cross-play features, they still made it nearly impossible for gamedevs to negotiate Voice chat features to be included. The Guns of Icarus developers had to have multiple meetings with Sony, just to enable both text & voice chat for players to communicate with each other through Cross-play.
Personally a PC is all I need because it offers a wide range of games from indie to AAA and there is also the possibility of playing older games and even console emulation. But I still think that consoles aren't going anywhere anytime soon because some people prefer the simplicity of just turning on an console and jumping into the game right away. For a more casual gamer, console is definitely easier.
The pre-built and gaming laptop markets have done a lot to sway people into at least trying PC gaming. You can even get them for as low as console prices at places like Walmart or find them on the shelves of Costco. Now a lot of PC gamers can decry the quality of them (Poor part pairings pre-builts with overpowered CPUs and underpowered GPUs, underclocked CPUs on laptops to prevent overheating, cheap power supplies, etc.) but there is a market for prebuilts and laptops that have been capturing the markets a ton.
Especially nowadays since a lot of people will use computers for work or recreationally, might as well get more out of them by being able to play video games on them.
@@TheOnlyBongo yes that is very true, personally I started with pre built PCs before I learned to build my own. Sure they aren't as good and the quality of parts used can be questionable but they are definitely a great starting point.
Pc is ahit
@@bryanking1428 yea. Still cant understand why Nintendo + pc is the best combo of all
@@TheOnlyBongo Casual gamers gamers care about price. A $500 console plays AAA games at 1440p/60fps.
A $500 PC/laptop from Walmart will have onboard graphic and will not even pass the minimum requirements spec to play a 5 year old game .
To be fair, the Wii U was rlly cool and had a great idea going for it, they just could have executed it better
"Consoles are going extinct"
Reality: Sony and Nintendo are breaking hardware/software records on a monthly basis and making more money than they ever have in their histories. PS5 is on pace to outsell PS4, Switch outsold the Wii...console gaming has never been in a better place. Especially when it comes to AAA gaming, aka "real gaming". PC/Mobile have more revenue because that's where most of the soulless, cash grabby, microtransaction infused garbage are.
It's only Xbox that is failing as a console.... Just because Xbox is failing, doesn't mean the other 2 are. And there's zero evidence of cloud gaming replacing native hardware, Microsoft themselves have admitted that no one is really using xCloud, and Stadia, which was the best cloud service by far, is now dead. This video was poorly researched and has no basis in reality.
It's because the tech for universal cloud gaming isn't quite there yet. In another 5-10 years people will probably be more accepting of it as it advances. The main draw of cloud streaming is that you do not need to buy incredibly powerful hardware to run games at max.
Nokia was also breaking all kinds of records when the iPhone showed up. I think most console players can possibly play on the cloud, for them latency doesn't matter much anyway. Probably there would be 2 console versions, one super cheap which will connect to the cloud and do some magic for the latency to at least feel bearable and one expensive with real hardware. I don't think the cloud solution will be for all, but it is true there are some casual players who loved Stadia, so they would "love" any cloud solution.
Amusing take. Just because you don't agree with the content doesn't make it wrong.
Ps5 is not going outsell the ps4 lmfao get real. Also PC sales for games at #1 for most companies. Capcom literally makes half their revenue off PC alone. Lmao
@@Optim121ps5 already sold 50 million units only in its 3rd year,.. it’s definitely outselling
I want consoles to stay around because having a physical copy of a game on a console is the only way to truly own a game and not just the license to play it
Let's hope indie game developers, AA game studios, and independent retail stores will save physical media of video games because indie game developers, AA game studios, and independent retail stores cares about you and listen to you.
They are already removing titles from the online game stores. You can only buy certain titles on physical media like Drive Club on the Playstation (I have a copy and it's amazing. If only Sony would bring it back with a remaster and 60 fps unlock. BTW Digital Foundry demonstrated a hacked PS5 playing it at 60 fps).
In a way, you could make a copy of the game installer from a GOG, but there are not many modern games there
@@vadnegru indie/AA games: Are we a joke to you?
While I don't think there's anything wrong w/ the idea of physical games, there's everything wrong w/ the idea of the companies running storefronts potentially removing your ability to play a game that you purchased, if that ever happens. As long as they make it so w/ digital copies your ability to download and play the game regardless of whether or not it gets removed from being playable, then that issue should be fixed. Meanwhile w/ regards to streaming games from the cloud, I hope that we don't find ourselves at a point where that's the only option for playing games, due to the potential for connection issues w/ the server the game's being run on.
Physical media > streaming
14:18 gamepass is a cancer on the industry for consumers and any subscription service like it is cancer as well.
I agree with you on console gaming. I feel like gaming is going to take a new form and thing are going look different in the future; Especially with thing like cross-play. The only point which seemed weird was the idea of handhelds not being considered consoles. It felt more like a good excuse to explain away why Nintendo is the odd one out.
The reason I got a ps4 slim and a normal ps5 just because my pc cant run most games or lags alot like it…but when my first console ps4 slim came to me I was finally able to play fortnite with 60 fps, i could run wtnc 2
My ps5 just doubled it from there.
Thats because you have a potato pc.
My pc hardly evey drops below 144 fps.
If I run at 1080p. It never drops below 144 fps
@@sahhull I have a PS5 and Xbox series S for the kids and I play too. The problem is together it was $800 for both. I don’t know anything about tech but if PC is more simple, just turn on and play right away and a lot cheaper than $800. I would definitely go to the PC store. I just never want spend that much money again.
No, mobile is still a long long long way to be able to do what consoles can. Just ask Google Stadia
Imagine we lost all our mobile game IPs over their stereotype "mobile game is dead" but they don't even tried to play those 🥶
Say that to asians mobile gaming is really popular there
Hand held gaming is impressive but the prices of phones that can run resident evil 4 and 8 are 2k in my country when a console that’s 500 dollars can get 60 fps 1080-1440p on the same game ,mobile games just aren’t good pricewise
@@emka9537all the UA-cam shorts 9 yos playing garena free fire at 20 fps
Yeah and folk don't care, look at china where mobile gaming is the norm they all care about playing games they don't care about the specs.
I don’t want to pay for all the games I won’t play, only the games I will play… and I want to have them in my possession, physically forever.
so......no emulation? what if forever game deteriorates and just stops working?
good point, digital copies are ok because they can’t be taken away, but I’m not for streaming as the main vending. I believe there is a higher probability of losing access to a streaming collection if whatever service that is hosting it goes out of business or changes the policy… or anything like that than the physical media actually deteriorating in my lifetime. Additionally, the physical media is transferable to friends and family without any oversight but the streaming version of that relies on the good graces of the company to do so… unless you want to give someone your account if it’s allowed and then it’s an all or nothing situation. Basically I believe it’s important to recognize that certain rights and privileges are lost going to streaming. These companies all want people to not own anything and to pay for access so that we all pay more over the long run and don’t own anything and can’t give it to anyone. We give up a certain amount of control doing that.
I also forgot about the used game market. It’s great to buy a used disc for 20% of the original price.
Maybe in the future, all consoles are gonna be handheld!
Interesting thought!
You actually understand! This is exactly where the future is headed, all computer and gaming needs will be met by one powerful and small handheld device. Switch and Steam Deck (which I have) already show hints of this future.
And hopefully modular.
Eventually, the smartphone will replace your console. I can already play resident evil 4 on my iPhone. Within 3 years all aaa games will have iOS ports
@@richarddukard8989 The future devices will no longer have the concept of ports. It will be one device type, one OS that can do it all. Android VS iOS, Windows VS Linux, that will no longer exist in that world. Smartphones will evolve and join with handhelds to become that device.
I believe owning physical copies of games (or downloading them) is always necessary. Alot of the consoles I have games are downloaded on them just in case the disk stops working tbh
I don't think Xbox will actually leave the console market completely. It's just that the console won't be their sole platform for games. It will be one spoke in a wheel that includes Xbox, PC, cloud gaming, mobile and occasionally other consoles, especially games with live service components. Xbox will still be their primary default GamePass platform, but they'll just keep upgrading it iteratively like a PC and I'm hoping Sony and Nintendo do the same so that we can continue to run old games on newer hardware.
Nothing beats PC when it comes to gaming.
I bought a gamecube a few months ago. Playing games that I never owned as a kid. I am having the time of my life.
one day I'll play Chrono Trigger on Super Nintendo (emulator) :)
Aww cute. Do enjoy ❤
I have a GameCube in my computer with PS4 controller.
Is already hybrid .and I like it gives you access what you didn't have access before.hybrid gaming is the future.
Did the same with a Ps2
That experience will soon be completely gone.
I've been a PC gamer for over ten years now, but I still like playing consoles, mainly because of couch gaming, physical discs, and all that.
I don't really play console games. But this video sounds just like the doom and gloom I heard about PC games when I was growing up. People were saying how PC games were going to die. And look at where PC games are now. I don't think the console is going anywhere.
It's not 'doom and gloom', consoles not being the main focus of game development is a good thing. PC is an inherently superior platform and we finally just witnessing that come to a head. People are realizing it is way more economical to get a PC than a console.
@@spacedaniel492What are you smoking my guy? The PS5 is literally the target platform for devs this generation. Not to mention that the majority of PC players only care about comp games like CS, Dota, LoL or Valorant. People are exaggerating the relevance of the PC way too much, without consoles gaming would be not the same. PCs, especially nowadays are not more "economical", graphics cards are absurdly priced, even long after the crypto mining hype and the majority of PC games not only cost the same as console games do nowadays, they stutter like hell.
@@nikitos3558 brother, what? you realize a ps5 costs sony something like $1000 to make? they sell at a loss. $1000 is more than enough to build a gaming pc that will last for multiple console generations. The ps5 is running on 2019 tech. I was already palying at ps5 levels back then. The few ps5 games to make it to pc a YEAR after their release on console are always better. I absolutely loved days gone on ps4. I got it day 1 on pc release, even though i beat it a few times on ps4 on multiple difficulties. The PC experience was still fresh to me. The graphics were much better, the game play was way smoother, i had WAY more than "30fps" which most consoles are locked to. To say pc gaming is irrelevant is to tell us you are an ostrich with its head in the sand. Palworld has sold millions of copies, and its not on console. Rust has millions of players. Same thing. CS:GO, same thing. If sony sold a ps5 at cost, it wouldnt sell at ALL. they need to heavily subsidize it. with $1000 in a pc, $500 on a gpu will have me gaming for generations. 500$ on a PS5 sounds great, until you realize the parts inside have been obsolete for half a decade and still cost $1000 for them to produce.
@@nikitos3558 you might wanna look at the sales of hell divers, elder ring, palworld? even sony is realizing PC is waaay bigger than whatever numbers their PS5 will ever do
This is an ebb and flow. PC is just the "it" kid today, that is all.
Moreover, certain genres of video games, such as automation, factory, and city builder games, don't work as well on consoles but work much better on PCs, which have keyboard and mouse.
Controllers just don't have enough buttons for certain genres such as automation, city builder, and factory games, although touch screen may help some.
Ima indie developer, I love your videos, so well done and inspirational, thank you
Are they actually going extinct? They seem to be out there and are selling very well.
This seems like a biased perspective not without some merits but is far from the full scope of the issue.
@TheMahayanist The revenue point seems realistic, but selling less than they've ever sold? Numbers-wise, that is incorrect. Maybe Xbox. Definitely not Nintendo or Sony. Sony is outpacing the PS4 right with the PS5 and the Switch is steamrolling all of their previous records.
@@PeteOlivaPlaystation 2 numbers sold: 158 million units.
Playstation 5 numbers sold: 53 million units in a market with significantly more gamers.
Consoles are dying.
@@jellyfrosh9102The PS2 only sold as much as it did due to it doubling up as a DVD player. DVD players only became accessible, financially to the wider audience around the launch of the PS2 in 2000.
@@jellyfrosh9102 And that was after PS2's complete lifespan. That's not a good comparison.
@@PeteOliva PS2 Production Shipments were 117.9 million as of March 2007.
117.9 divided by 7 years (2000-2007) of sales is 16,842,857 per year. So 16.85 million consoles per year.
The PS5 has sold 50 million units as of December 2023, which is 16.67 million per year averaged out.
The entire game industry combined in value was 6.6 billion dollars in 2000. The industry in 2022 was valued at 97.67 billion. So it's 1372% bigger than it was in 2000 when the PS2 launched, yet the PS5 is at BEST meeting the sales figures of the PS2 from 20 years ago when the industry was less than 1/10th of the size it is now.
Oh and if you adjust for inflation, the PS5 is actually cheaper than the PS2 was for the first 2 years of the PS2's life. The PS2 also had to compete with 3 other consoles, the PS5 competes with 2.
Consoles are dying.
Do not let consoles or discs die. Companies salivate the day they can sell you overpriced digital games you'll never have control over, resell or lend to your friends.
Exactly! It's deeper than that though. Communist take over attempt. Seriously. They are part of the "Great reset." Everyone better wake up!
consoles WON'T die cause there'll still be a market for it cause plenty of people are going to still want it, videos like this are just made to make other's worry for no true reason
I don't think consoles will die anytime soon ...look how the ps 5 sold the first 2 years it kept selling out .....they just need to make more games to keep the consoles selling....
@@OnlySayorilook at the Xbox One S. They're already trying to push people away from owning physical copies
You act like piracy dosent exist
If these consoles want to live forever and prolong their existence, here's one: Backwards Compatibility to past console generations. Imagine if you can straight up play PS1, PS2, or PS3 games onto the PS6 with additional options such as fixed antialiasing for example. It will be mindblowing and rewarding for longtime Playstation fans who are always loyal to their console products since the PS1's inception.
I have a killer PC and both current gen consoles and their previous generations. Honestly cloud gaming is cool but playing on a local machine will always be a better experience. Even hardwired in and within ft of my router/modem I do notice input lag and visual artifacts. The upside to consoles is that the interface is more laid back and easier to use on a couch setting for media and games, local multiplayer support is much better, and I’m only paying $500 instead of $1000 for a pc in the living room. Size matters as well and it’s more compact
true, nothing like 4k 120 hdr10 on an 83" oled and a proper sound system.
You can customize your UI on pc....
There are multiple ''gaming interfaces'' available
Also check out rainmeter and docking software....
And you can get a decent PC for 500$ if you know how. I've bought entire builds for 5$ second-hand multiple times with some older hardware. But hey if you can score a PSU and some RAM, a HDD for5$ then all you really need is a 50-100$ GPU.
Point is it can be done on the cheap you just gotta look for some deals
@@RobotronSage Dude nobody spends so much time of their life for that apart from some nerds let's be real. Would you rather spend 2 months configuring some fake-console UI, trying to find some good deals of hardware and then building all of that up yourself for 500$ or just go to your local store and buy a 500$ console which is going to work smooth as butter and have perfect graphics for 95% of people. One takes you days, weeks or months. The other takes you 15 minutes to the store and 10 minutes to set everything up. I value my time more than I value my money. And if gaming is a secondary hobby for me then the console is by far the best choice.
@@RobotronSage brother i would never tell people to just go and build a pc for the cheap. we can do that cuz we know where to look and are nerds. my cousin aint gonna bother with that sort of shit. consoles are a nice convenient way to get people to play games that otherwise wouldnt. My cousin loves him some call of duty, and i can play with him because of cross play. Otherwise, he wouldnt play video games at all, nobody got time to be building pc and searching for parts. I do, and i enjoy it, but thats not the normal case.
you can build a small PC and use it on the TV
There's a couple things keeping me on console, and the main one is physical games. I can go out and buy a game, new or second hand, and it's mine until either the disc or console breaks. That's all I care about.
Consoles were declared dead before gen 8. Even Sony were nervous about it. Then PS4 happened. Then PS5 happened. They sold pretty well.
You explained the video game market - past, present, and future - so well. Great video.
i am *very* satisfied with my PS5 right now.
cant say i ever really cared for market trends either... the games that care about being good games never really needed massive media markets backing them to be made
Same.
I only play single player story driven games , never cared about run around mindless shoot them up multiplayer games .
Honestly the PS5 exclusive library just isn't worth it imo
It's practically a big waste of time, you'd be better off just getting a strong enough PC instead.
@@brandonleemoss
already have one... two actually but the second one isnt really strong enough.
i have and play the PS5 because i prefer it.
@@brandonleemoss What prebuilt $500 PC can play games like a $500 console?
@@Crashed131963
STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC Computer,Intel Core I7 3.4 GHz up to 3.9 GHz,Radeon RX 580 8G GDDR5,16G RAM,512G SSD,WiFi,Bluetooth 5.0,RGB Fanx6,RGB Keyboard&Mouse&Mouse Pad,RGB BT Sound Bar,W10H64
For $450
Having a blast with this so far!
I stopped owning consoles after PS2, and switched entirely to PC. But it's really fascinating learning the history. Huge props to the editors and the narrator, great content!
I'm a similar situation it was after the PS3 with me i moved to pc.
Same bro, but I’ve always wanted to buy PS3 only to play some games that only exists in PS3 and nothing else and wanted to play it for so long.. that’s only reason I want to buy it or I might as well buy PS5 since it’s could probably run all the games, but Pc will be the best because it’s easier and you can install a lot of mods for every game and the only problem is lag
@@Omega-jg4oq cant you just have a ps3 emulator if you really want those games? but if you dont want to go that route, a ps3 would still be a better bet for you than a ps5 if you just want to try a few and only on ps3 games. if you want to explore more then def ps5
@@ripewatermelonlol I don’t even know how PS5 even works and my brother was planning to buy it for me, but PS3 Emulator? You think I haven’t tried that yet.. I had ton of problems make PS3 Emulator run and I’ve watched bunch of tutorials and guides but there’s always lag and crashes and sound breaking and the game running at 10 to 20 fps and even some texture issues.. but PS2 Emulator and Wii Dolphin Emulator are working quite well, hell.. I can even make PS2 emulator run smoothly in my own phone which it is aether Sx2 I think and the games works quite good which it is crazy because I never imagined that Phone will be capable of that and they are lucky that PS2 is already limited hardware doesn’t require a lot of stuff and it’s pretty old
@@ripewatermelonlol rpcs3 is still really wonky since the ps3 is very hard to emulate
but its the best for now
I don’t buy this argument that the Switch is somehow not a console because it’s playable as both an handheld and on a TV. Handheld consoles are still consoles. This smacks of elitism and really doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.
I think it's complete hyperbole to say they are going extinct, consoles still have much higher player counts than PCs because of their high power for a good price and their convenience, and I say this as a PC player.
And the conclusion that cloud gaming will take over consoles seems logical, but I disagree. I think there will always be a chunk of peoplebthat prefer natively running their games so they can play offline or avoid paying *subscriptions*
GTA 6 will boost console sales for sure
Not as much as you’d think, wait and see how broken and greedy it is first, you thought shark cards were bad. Pay to win inbound.
All aboard the hype train
@@SkylineCypher I won’t even be buying any new games. I have plenty of old emulation to play and being an adult I don’t have time to even do that most days.
You get people who are into the game and pay to win is introduced anyone who wants to even compete online will be dropping loads of money.
Look at the old star wars game, it was pay to win and if you didn’t you just get nukes every game, the company makes the game not enjoyable unless you’re sinking endless cash into it and I’m done with any of that or the game companies that do this.
@@sushi_wolf I don't you don't know what GTA is for the average gamer
It's called a skinnerbox@@SkylineCypher
He says this as Sony and Nintendo are breaking sales records
That's because people intuitively know these are among the final physical media consoles, perhaps ever. We're all getting what we can before we are forced to not own anything.
People really seem to believe that Microsoft's eventual failure in the console space after having their 15 minutes of fame with the 360 somehow applies to console gaming in general. Completely delusional. Nintendo especially can probably sustain a platform almost entirely off of their first party output, so as long as they never put it on PC or the cloud they'll keep selling console hardware.
because bro how can u keep repeating those sales the ps6 will be computer under there controll telling you what you can and cant do and still having to pay subscription to play online switch gets a pass because there hardware bad and they have the most exclusive games cant wait for switch 2
8:26 As someone who had a Wii U and an Xbox One, the Wii U gamepad looks like a mobile thing, but it was a controller and a good one at that. One thing that was commonly considered junk with the Xbox One but I used all the time was the built-in capture card.
I see you reached a 100k subs. Congrats! very well done!
The only reason why mobile phones are dominating the market is because-would you guess it-everybody has one. The statement "consoles are going instinct" is irrational and absurd. There has always been a market for console gaming, and console gaming will continue to appeal to its own niche of gamers who prefer their gaming experience with a gamepad on the TV screen-not to mention that first-party console-exclusive titles will also continue to be released by companies like Nintendo.
Why can't you game with a gamepad on the TV screen with a PC? No reason consoles need to exist for that.
This was one of the dumbest videos I’ve seen. Couldn’t watch the whole thing but hey anything for UA-cam ad money
@@dispencer17Except PCs are getting expensive and it’s hard to figure out the right one. For a console you can instantly tell the games you can play. The actual game quality often just comes down to developer mistakes, not the console.
Not sure you understand what "going extinct" means.
Just because there is a market does not make it viable for profit.
The market will exist even if it drops below the range where making a profit off of it is possible.
At some point you will still have some customers willing to pay but no providers because the cost of production means zero profit. Or the cost of consels go up to 20x cost + inflation.
Would you pay 20-25k for a consol today?
Also, some that would be willing wouldn't be able to afford it.
@@jacobnash9755Bruh consoles are never going to cost anywhere close to $20-25k lmao, not in our lifetime at least. And people have said this “consoles will die out soon” bs since the PS3/360/Wii era. Then they said the PS4/XB1 would be the last gen of consoles. Now here we are with the PS5 and Series X/S (and even the Switch still is doing extremely well), and there is no sign of slowing down for consoles. I know a ton of people who play on PS/Xbox primarily still (including myself) and I know people who primarily play on PC who still have a PlayStation as well to play first party games or to just casually enjoy playing classics on the couch sometimes. Same goes for Nintendo and Xbox.
There is still a huge market for consoles and there will continue to be new console generations for a long time, I guarantee it.
video game presorvation is important, and game consoles are important for game presorvation, so consoles dieng out is a very bad thing we should be activly fighting as a comunity, but most gamers dont think about presorvation, and probably dont even care since older games arint theyre games.
Better to stop buying remakes/remasters of retro triple AAA games (including the Nintendo ones) and instead, start buying indie games and AA games.
_"game consoles is important for game presorvation"_
That couldn't be further from the truth. I used to have a repair and modding business, disc drives and discs should be seen like AAA batteries, they are ALL dying.
If you think that buying physical means that you're preserving, you're dead wrong. Discs are rotting, literally (google "disc rot") and lasers have a 20 to 30 years lifespan.
Also, between "day one content", day one patches, broken and unfinished games, and online requirement, there's almost nothing to preserve.
Wipe your system clean, do not connect it to the internet and try to play your games and come and tell me again about preservation... I bet you that 80% of the game you think you own aren't even playable, or will be riddled with bugs.
Piracy is literally our only way to preserve games. But we're 1 Carrington event away from losing it all.
In other words, the current state of gaming preservation is probably around 0.001%. Game preservation is probably the biggest myth in the gaming community, along with naked Lara Croft...
your both right here about the finate life span of physical media, and yet wrong that its not important becuase of that finite life, for the very simple reason that physical media can be kept safe, guarded, while digital media is entirely vulnerable to the meddling of the companies that own it, you cant play any game a company doesint want you to if its digital only... you can only protect games form companies when theyre physical, theres no other option, exchept for piracy which can be dangerous opten inferior to the original with un intended bugs and glitches or actual malware, it can still be taken down by companies that own the ip, andnew games cant be preserved or at least will remain un protected for years untill they are leaked... if they are leaked, so yes, physical media is imperfect... and that point is entirely worthless and irelevent, your argument fails simply becuase your only responce to preservation is a big dumb worthless who cares why try at all... ridiculas, get a clue, even if you dont care, many people cherish theyre games and want to keep them for future generations to experiance.@@SLRModShop
@SLRModShop That's not a good sign for physical games!🥶
Is there any way to prevent disks from rotting like hell?
Also, I hope indie game developers, AA game studios, and independent retail stores will save physical media of video games because indie game developers, AA game studios, and independent retail stores cares about you and listen to you.
Just remaster those old games witthout changing the story or style
I saw the same video 10 years ago...
But smartphones already killed not only the console market but PCs as well!
Don’t you remember that the iPhone is a fully functioning PC in your pocket for the fraction of the price?
/s
I like the references to Kodak/digital cameras and Blockbuster/Netflix.
I've got another in the same vein. Sears and Amazon.
Sears started in the railroad age with catalogs and home delivery and had the chance to go online at the start of the Internet age. They didn't and Amazon didn't take very long to practically destroy Sears. When was the last time you saw a Sears store, catalog or advertisement? Our lives are fulfilled by Amazon now. Sears already had the shipping infrastructure to stay on top of the market in the '90s and totally dropped the ball letting our friend Jeff completely take over. The whole way the Internet changed America is incredibly fascinating to me because I watched it happen and like Sears I was resistant to it, not getting an email account until 1998. But most of your viewers are probably too young for all that. Great video too, thanks.
I really hope we don’t get a streaming future. It will never be as good as console or pc, it physically cannot be as good no matter how powerful the hardware becomes.
What I hope is we start getting more console pc hybrids like the old steam machines or steam deck. People want the console experience, they want decent standardized specs and they simplicity and ease of use. The solution is to make home theater pcs with simplified operating systems dedicated primarily to gaming. These could be consoles but they probably won’t have exclusivity anymore.
i think it will be better if microsoft makes an dedicated os for gaming with console like ui and controller support but that os will dupport all winfows applications😊
I highly doubt consoles are going to become obsolete anytime soon.
This. Let's have more of this attitude. Instead of repeating ad-nauseum what we DON'T want, let's repeat ad-nauseum what we DO want. Cheers, mate.
@@rabbitcreative No problem.👍
I remember the Atari 2600 and the Commodore C64 .
I am lucky enough to see the evolution of the computers over the years .
Happy new year everyone .
Atari 2600 has released a new version of the 2600. Retro gamers love it...
@@raphaellall6270 show me a link ?
Happy new year bro
@@earthsurgery1237