Budget Magic: $66 (16 tix) Rakdos Aristocrats (Standard, Magic Arena)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 187

  • @xrfreedom
    @xrfreedom 5 років тому +2

    The commentary is simply incredible. World class!

  • @DiogoVKersting
    @DiogoVKersting 5 років тому +68

    *Discards two Bontu to Rix*
    - What? Why did you do that? What were you trying to draw?
    - Three Bontu.

    • @TheForbiddenDance
      @TheForbiddenDance 5 років тому +5

      maybe don't cast it with spectacle...

    • @pocketwatched
      @pocketwatched 5 років тому +6

      Seth, "Oof, this feels terrible, we're discarding all of our Bontus."
      Then maybe... don't? I mean, or do, I guess.

    • @DiogoVKersting
      @DiogoVKersting 5 років тому +4

      @Guy GILLOTT Yeah, I know. But if you think about it, pretty much any draw from that point on is a good draw, even a land, which would allow him to play Bontu. A recursive 5/6 menace is still pretty good.
      The deck doesn't have a lot of card draw, and he's discarding his two best cards to draw cards late game. The chances of running out of action after discarding the two Bontu are not small at all.
      Lastly the opponent was at 17 on turn 5. Trying to "aggro" the opponent out at that point seemed a bit too ambitious.
      Also did you have a look at the decklist? There was nothing much better than Bontu for him to draw at that point.

    • @myztik5716
      @myztik5716 5 років тому +2

      No reason to spectacle it, just cast it normally and discard one Bontu

  • @bryantan4228
    @bryantan4228 5 років тому +44

    14:45 Maybe my math is off but activated Priest to hit opponent for 2, plus 4 butcher damage, plus 1 Fiend Damage, plus cast Heartfire sacrificing Priest is lethal.

    • @shiverbanegames
      @shiverbanegames 5 років тому

      That’s what I was thinking. Had to pause the video and run through it to make sure I wasn’t overlooking anything.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +2

      Hmm, I think you're right. Oops!

    • @-sergio-8758
      @-sergio-8758 5 років тому

      Yeah he missed lethal that turn, 4+2+4+1=11

  • @chemset475
    @chemset475 5 років тому +15

    Shout out to Seth for years of budget magic. In a world of netdecking and pricey formats, thanks for helping keep the game feel accessible to those on a budget!

  • @ExtremeMedium
    @ExtremeMedium 5 років тому +39

    Good ol' Tibalt, the Rorschach Instigator

    • @csabaalmasi5297
      @csabaalmasi5297 5 років тому +4

      Tibalt the riksha instigator - indians' worst nightmare

  • @foxyr4bbit
    @foxyr4bbit 5 років тому +42

    "maybe this deck is actually really good!"
    -seth about every deck

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +8

      Lol, do I really say that every time?

    • @SeanGomesPortfolio
      @SeanGomesPortfolio 5 років тому +7

      @@MTGGoldfish You do fairly often, and I really appreciate the positivity.

    • @DoctorChuck
      @DoctorChuck 5 років тому

      @@MTGGoldfish Do you think it's the deck or do they all just have a good pilot?

  • @the1cecreamMan
    @the1cecreamMan 5 років тому +62

    Is no one gonna acknowledge the fact that the mono red player's name is Buttfingers

    • @Borkybaby
      @Borkybaby 5 років тому +1

      Sebastian Rodriguez and he’s touching his keyboard with them buttfingers 🤣🤣🤣

    • @Thane1607
      @Thane1607 5 років тому

      Don't kink shame

  • @Zakading
    @Zakading 5 років тому +16

    We need Seth to read some fantasy novel to us on stream. One with plenty of weird fantasy names. Take a shot each time he mispronounces something.

  • @_null
    @_null 5 років тому +49

    god eternal bonut X D

    • @Zakading
      @Zakading 5 років тому

      BONE NUT Gachigasm

  • @evancuyuch9260
    @evancuyuch9260 5 років тому +11

    I've been playing this deck since week one of WAR standard and I've never been more angry seeing Seth pitch both bontu's in game three against sultai

  • @benjaminramsey1822
    @benjaminramsey1822 5 років тому +7

    The laughing snap concede at Lilliana being played at @31:53 made me hiccup in laughter, same Seth, same.

    • @messiawsum
      @messiawsum 5 років тому +1

      I've never seen someone concede so quick lmao

  • @ctomsky
    @ctomsky 5 років тому +10

    3:31 Tibalt, Rishak Instigator. Oh Seth, never change.

    • @babycakes8873
      @babycakes8873 5 років тому +1

      Chris Tomsky it’s not even close

    • @PinionPlays
      @PinionPlays 5 років тому

      The worst part is rakish is just a word, it's not something silly like Fblthp

  • @shahmirsamee6964
    @shahmirsamee6964 5 років тому +2

    1:03:00 was an early scoop, imo. Could have played Plaguecrafter post-combat and sacrifice Dreadhorde Butcher. If they sac the token from Phoenix, you can kill Illharg with Butcher's death trigger plus Mayhem Devil ping and their board is empty. If they sac Illharg, could have pinged the Phoenix token with Mayhem Devil and sent the 5 damage from Butcher trigger to their face.
    Not a straight win, but leaves you with a 3/3 and 3/2 on board, no creatures on their side and could potentially win with combat + Heartfire on the next turn.

    • @myztik5716
      @myztik5716 5 років тому

      Mayhem Devil was dying in combat, there would be no ping

  • @comokazijeff
    @comokazijeff 5 років тому +8

    What a spicy deck! Thanks for the video!!

  • @garrett1433
    @garrett1433 5 років тому +7

    I'm doing Mardu Aristocrats, and no joke, the deck has so many ways of playing it, I'm currently running 2 mayhem devil and 2 hero of precinct one

    • @aR0ttenBANANA
      @aR0ttenBANANA 5 років тому +1

      I'm playing it with hero and Teysa Karlov. I've actually one shot people by turn 5 with a kaya's wrath.

    • @Germynator31
      @Germynator31 5 років тому +1

      www.mtgvault.com/germynator/decks/mardu-aristokrats/
      This is my current MTGA build and I'm really enjoying how versatile it is.
      Whats the difference to your deck and why? Really would appreciate an open conversation about it.. :)

  • @MasterVash
    @MasterVash 5 років тому +4

    Aristocrats without Cruel Celebrant is bold. Even in a budget deck, I'd still try to swing a little white for it. It's just so good.

    • @Volvary
      @Volvary 5 років тому +2

      Problem is that the lands right now are really expensive. So 3 colors is not really budget friendly.

  • @smegmalasagna
    @smegmalasagna 5 років тому +2

    11:38 You can also sacrifice Mayhem Devil. Since all of the permanents got sacrificed simultaniously the triggers will still go in.

  • @Canadian_Ry
    @Canadian_Ry 5 років тому

    I really like how this deck plays. Thanks for showcasing it!

  • @kylekinnear8878
    @kylekinnear8878 5 років тому +2

    Man the sequencing at 30:20 was way off. If that was going to be your line, you could have Heartfired the Branchwalker, pinged the elf and finished Davriel off with combat damage. That would have left you 2 creatures, instead of 0, and your opponent would have had the same board.

    • @david_in_perth
      @david_in_perth 5 років тому

      Nice, thanks for laying it out. I had a feeling it wasn't optimal, but it went by too fast and I didn't feel like rewinding the video.

  • @Dinakol
    @Dinakol 5 років тому +1

    I love the comments. We all love you Saffron and absolutely love your commentary :D

  • @StereoMagician
    @StereoMagician 5 років тому +1

    Hey Seth! I just noticed that some of the copies of cards are blocked by you being on the screen. It's not a big deal but if the number of copies was moved above the card image instead it wouldn't be an issue. Thank you for all the awesome content!

  • @DJayPhresh
    @DJayPhresh 5 років тому +26

    R I S H A K

    • @tarta99
      @tarta99 5 років тому

      Man, he does it so often I dunno if it's on purpose

  • @crovax1375
    @crovax1375 5 років тому +2

    Rakdos Aristocrats is one of my most favorite deck builds!

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +2

      It's fun and actually pretty sweet!

  • @davidross5305
    @davidross5305 5 років тому +30

    This channel is almost as famous as Seth's mispronunciation omegalul

  • @rileykeith5980
    @rileykeith5980 5 років тому +1

    Anyone notice at 50:45 when opponents life total didn't change from the death ping?

    • @IamAdamWe
      @IamAdamWe 5 років тому

      Yeah that's weird, did seth somehow manage to submit 0 or something? is there a shortcut for that?

    • @rileykeith5980
      @rileykeith5980 5 років тому

      @@IamAdamWe no damage isn't a may ability. This is a bug.

    • @IamAdamWe
      @IamAdamWe 5 років тому

      @@rileykeith5980 good point, not that it mattered in the end lol

  • @ilovebears1233
    @ilovebears1233 5 років тому +1

    Pretty nice build! I think I'm gonna make it myself!
    Nice video

  • @DarkThomy
    @DarkThomy 5 років тому +1

    40:20 It's clearly a punt here.
    Priest's effect would have cleared opponent's creatures anyway but during your turn you would have gain two mana to secure the casting of Bontu.

    • @myztik5716
      @myztik5716 5 років тому

      He would have had two creatures while Priest only takes care of one, and there's no guarantee the 2/1 jadelight wouldn't have explored into counters

  • @TheSailorKing
    @TheSailorKing 5 років тому +2

    why at 40:55 you discarded the bontus the only way to come on top of the situation Rix maadi reveler should only be used as loot a card except if you don't have one

  • @nickjackson1993
    @nickjackson1993 5 років тому +1

    Was the “mono red” player splashing green just for the status/statue- chainwhirler combo?

  • @SomeFreakingCactus
    @SomeFreakingCactus 5 років тому +1

    The Flame of Keld would be an excellent addition to this deck.

  • @saiyangoomba1244
    @saiyangoomba1244 5 років тому +4

    29:53 Danarfel?

  • @georgelacatus1495
    @georgelacatus1495 5 років тому

    Cool deck! Was lots of fun. I'd love to see a budget amass deck done for next week, it's quite a powerful mechanic

  • @Ghost26968
    @Ghost26968 5 років тому +6

    WotC:Nexus of Fate isn't a problem
    Also WotC: We're going to print chemister's insight, Wilderness Reclamation, Tamiyo, and Narset one after the other with Nexus still in standard.

    • @RyanIcey
      @RyanIcey 5 років тому +4

      Some decks also include Teferi to make it uncounterable. Because you know, Nexus was already an insanely easy combo to stop.

  • @jeremylim4901
    @jeremylim4901 5 років тому +1

    whats the non-budget version tho

  • @ryanricky5207
    @ryanricky5207 5 років тому

    Deck looks good with a strong sideboard transformation

  • @Effrenatus
    @Effrenatus 5 років тому +6

    R I S H A K I N S T I G A T O R

  • @TheQueerLeaf
    @TheQueerLeaf 5 років тому +2

    Making jolt proud

  • @copulusnexus7417
    @copulusnexus7417 5 років тому +2

    "How effective is sacrificing our board to God-Eternal BONUT....."

  • @michapiwowarski4834
    @michapiwowarski4834 5 років тому +2

    Seth dont the blood crypts fit in the 100$ budget? and its a major improvement over guildgates

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +2

      They are close. About $40/playset at the moment. Could play two or three and still come in under $100. I've just been avoiding shocklands in budget decks since they are so expensive at the moment.

  • @SplashAttackTCG
    @SplashAttackTCG 5 років тому +5

    *Normally you give up land with Bontu. You know you FKd up when you give up Bontus for lands. 🤣😂🤣😂*

    • @bradenspangler7710
      @bradenspangler7710 5 років тому +3

      I was like sethhhh you should've just discarded one bontu you're not going to draw anything better than that lol

  • @chrisnavis
    @chrisnavis 5 років тому

    Would be cool if when Seth is on the screen he could format the cards that are behind to show the quantity on top instead of on the bottom so that way you can see how many are in said deck build. Either way, great stuff!

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      We're working on redesigning the deck techs, so changes/upgrades are coming!

  • @aR0ttenBANANA
    @aR0ttenBANANA 5 років тому

    Getting a curve of fiend into cruel celebrant or butcher, then Judith and Teysa can one shot your opponent with a Kaya's wrath. I just love the splash on white in that deck.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      Yeah! The white splash is fun, although really tough on a budget since the lands are really expensive.

  • @nerdlish
    @nerdlish 5 років тому +2

    Why is this deck not called Sakdos?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      This is a good question, seems like the perfect name for the archetype.

  • @dizman1235
    @dizman1235 5 років тому +5

    6:52

  • @joaoalvaronunes5146
    @joaoalvaronunes5146 5 років тому

    14:40 lethal:
    Sac the butchler and the fiend to the girl, girl makes them lose 2 life. Butchler deals 4, fiend deals 1. Than sack the girl to the heartfire. And that's 11, they were at 10

  • @JHawk213
    @JHawk213 5 років тому

    What would be a good modern budget version of this deck?

  • @KDiaz-hy1xx
    @KDiaz-hy1xx 5 років тому +2

    I’m so frustrated with Magic Arena. The economy warps deck building so much. I have the Bloodcypts, for example, but I’d never spend my wild cards on Butchers and and Rix.

    • @nbridges7321
      @nbridges7321 5 років тому

      I just complained about the same thing. So many cards in this deck are fundamental to it, but useless for much else. Using valuable rare wild cards on a non versatile card when all decks need like 30 rares is super annoying.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      Yeah, that is a bit part of the challenge. Everyone has different cards and getting new ones are expensive, so even a budget deck can range from cheap to expensive depending on what cards you happen to open.

    • @melvinfz0301
      @melvinfz0301 5 років тому +1

      It's quite difficult to state what is budget and what is expensive in Arena since the only thing that matters are wildcards. For example Hydroid Krasis and Timestream Navigator cost the same in Arena so if you find a budget deck running 4 Timestream Navigator and an expensive deck running 4 Hydroid Krasis is pretty obvious which you would prefeer to craft.
      Anyway, economy is great in Arena hundreads of dollars becomes thousand of dollars no joke :)

  • @Ched_TTV
    @Ched_TTV 5 років тому

    You need to try mardu aristocrats with citadel its so much fun. Cruel celebrant footlight fiend dreadhorde butcher mayhem devil they all go together so well

  • @nalbas828
    @nalbas828 5 років тому +3

    when modern horizons comes out we going to get like a month of modern like when standard release comes out.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +3

      Yeah, we'll have a big focus on Modern in a couple of weeks once Modern Horizons comes out. I don't know if it will be 100% Modern, but that will be the primary focus.

  • @penumbrallotus175
    @penumbrallotus175 5 років тому

    I know I'm a little late to this one but I just started arena and want to build this. My only concern is that rotation is so close and I was hoping for some help on replacing the cards that rotate. I think I know some like blood crypt for the summits and grim initiate for the firebrands but I'm stuck on the others. Anyone have any ideas?

  • @joegaylord87
    @joegaylord87 5 років тому

    So, why are none of these decks running Skirk Prospector? It feels like a set up for a huge potential game ending spell.

  • @genjiisopgenjiisop9629
    @genjiisopgenjiisop9629 5 років тому

    Is it worth buying this deck and playing with it on your local game store?

  • @christopherwoodbury7520
    @christopherwoodbury7520 5 років тому

    We aren't running any really rough mana costs so we probably ought to run evolving wilds instead of rakdos guildgate.

  • @RMQuarter
    @RMQuarter 5 років тому +2

    "Tibalt, Rishak Instigator" because Rakish isn't strong enough.

  • @malmadork
    @malmadork 5 років тому +3

    God eternal bonut is great

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      Especially when we discard them ;)

  • @whreREtjk4ko
    @whreREtjk4ko 5 років тому +7

    24 rares and 2 mythics is not exactly "budget" on MTGA.

    • @brandonennis6112
      @brandonennis6112 5 років тому

      Wraeththu It’s not supposed to be a budget arena deck

  • @Diotialate
    @Diotialate 5 років тому +1

    I think Rakdos is underplayed in general, and I keep wondering, with all these Jund players in Modern switching to B/G, why there aren't more cutting green for B/R.

    • @spice_krispies
      @spice_krispies 5 років тому +1

      Bc you have Assassins Trophy, Bloodbraid Elf, Scavenging Ooze, and a myriad of other good spells with green in it.

    • @Diotialate
      @Diotialate 5 років тому

      @@spice_krispies Yeah, but, Jund uses Scavaging Ooze and Tarmogoyf, which is a non-bo. It's the same excuse as Jeskai Control using Mana Leak AND Path to Exile - the entire deck is a card advantage/mana advantage engine, and then throws it away with Path/Leak.

  • @kevinwarsaw1793
    @kevinwarsaw1793 4 роки тому

    Ah, the innocent times of Rakdos before ovencats.

  • @South_North
    @South_North 5 років тому

    Getting the nut-draw with Bonut :P

  • @gamefreak203
    @gamefreak203 5 років тому

    What would you add as this deck wasn't a budget deck and what would you cut?

  • @Hanmacx
    @Hanmacx 5 років тому +1

    You need Pitiless Plunderer with Mayhem Devil

    • @xavisimon3095
      @xavisimon3095 5 років тому

      ohh thats an interesting concept for a treasure deck, but I think it will have to fit a completely diferent deck with Captain Storm and other token generators.

    • @xavisimon3095
      @xavisimon3095 5 років тому +1

      Im testing a storm the vault version of your idea.
      Its just a test but has work a couple of times on MTGO, it needs more draw mor control and more artifacts, I shoud probabli get some Saheeli, Sublime Artificer
      3 Treasure Map
      3 Sunbird's Invocation
      4 Spell Swindle
      2 Mayhem Devil
      2 Captain Lannery Storm
      2 Lightning Strike
      3 Watery Grave
      2 Mountain
      4 Island
      1 Orazca Relic
      2 Dragonskull Summit
      1 Swamp
      3 Brass's Bounty
      4 Storm the Vault
      1 Jhoira, Weatherlight Captain
      2 Depths of Desire
      3 Blood Crypt
      3 Sai, Master Thopterist
      2 Fountain of Renewal
      2 Mox Amber
      1 Fiery Cannonade
      1 Chromatic Lantern
      2 Search for Azcanta
      3 Steam Vents
      2 Sulfur Falls
      2 Drowned Catacomb
      2 Star of Extinction
      2 Lightning Strike
      2 Fiery Cannonade
      2 Sorcerous Spyglass
      1 Revel in Riches
      2 The Immortal Sun
      1 Jhoira, Weatherlight Captain
      1 Brass's Bounty
      2 Mayhem Devil

  • @maciek19882
    @maciek19882 5 років тому

    Will there ever be a rotation on Arena or is it going to be frontier esqe

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      Rotation will happen at the same time as paper (the end of September) but they are adding a new format alongside Standard (so far called Standard Plus) so you can use your rotated cards.

  • @nbridges7321
    @nbridges7321 5 років тому +2

    I'm sorry, but MTGA budget decks can't have over 10 rares. The cost may be low for paper, but 22 rares in MtGA is insane! I'm stuck trying to get all my lands, let alone use any WC on anything else.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      Budget Magic is in a weird place at the moment. In theory it's designed to be budget for paper players, while Budget Arena is based on the Arena budget, but with more and more people playing Arena this seems to cause some confusion. Might need to rethink the strategy.

    • @nbridges7321
      @nbridges7321 5 років тому

      Definitely see this as fun budget deck for an FNM, and I personally love this deck cause I have most of it already, but I agree that there is a distinction between Arena and paper budget definition. Keep up the good work! I always watch most of your videos day one, and your strategy helps me consider how I play

  • @smegmalasagna
    @smegmalasagna 5 років тому

    I feel like the 1/1 with first strike would be a better addition than the Firebrands

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      It might be (Grim Initiate I think you're talking about). Fanatical Firebrand is nice with Mayhem Devil since it sacs itself, but Grim Initiate is nice with our sac outlets since it amasses when it dies).

  • @Miscegenist
    @Miscegenist 5 років тому +1

    My vote for the deck name is RakSac

  • @xavisimon3095
    @xavisimon3095 5 років тому

    Great deck , I like almost everything that plays Priest of the forgotten gods (I'll use PoFG in the following text).
    In minute 40:30 I think the play kiling both jadelights whas rigt but bad luck with the folowing draws. I think my line of actuation would be wait until my turn and use the extra mana from PoFG to cast Bontu just for the body, a 5/6 menace force the enemy to chump-blok prety badly, and most part of the decks have onli cast down as removal against agro.
    I supose the deck is designed to be agro, and reasemblin skeleton doens't fit, but the skeleton is so good with PoFG , once you have the "dark-trinity" the resuting mat is: shok you face+ efict + draw a card for 2 mana.
    I think ill try a version of the deck chaging the 2 reaver + 2 Rix for 4 reasembling skeletons.
    The 2 remaiing Rix ...ill try to use them but ill probably prefer to replace them by 2 Midnight Reaper draw a milion cards an kill miself ^_^

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      Hmm, the bontu line might have been good.

  • @oldirtysean00
    @oldirtysean00 5 років тому

    Can you try to make radkos the showstopper good? I really want him to be playable. I was thinking about a liliana's contract deck but i suck at deck building.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      Rakdos is a really fun cards! I just wish there were more creatures to blow up (and less planeswalkers) in our current format.

  • @thatonekidtrex
    @thatonekidtrex 5 років тому

    How would you upgrade Seth?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      Check out the article in the destruction. There's a non-budget list in there!

    • @thatonekidtrex
      @thatonekidtrex 5 років тому

      @@MTGGoldfish ah I missed it, thanks!

    • @wesc8844
      @wesc8844 5 років тому

      @@MTGGoldfish In the "destruction"?? Cmon Seth, even with a autocorrect lol.

  • @camiloecheverria9765
    @camiloecheverria9765 5 років тому

    How can I send you a deck list ??, please, it's a really sweet and new deck for modern, it's complete mine and i've never seen something like this and it gives me a good results, I really want to show you my baby :DDD!!!! PLEASE ANSWER MEE

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      You can leave me a link here, or even better email me at SaffronOlive@MTGGOldfish.com.

  • @EloquentEulogy
    @EloquentEulogy 5 років тому

    At 41:00 Why do you discard your hand instead of one bontu? Most of your deck costs 2 or less, which you could play and have the ability to sacrifice with priest, or you draw a land and can play bontu to lose a creature and two land to refill your hand. It feels like you play into far less outs by losing both of your top end wincons.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      Yeah, it would have been better to not spectacle, especially with how things turned out (having three lands in a row on top of our deck).

  • @vincentbono2682
    @vincentbono2682 5 років тому

    I would minus 2 forgotten gods and those amass zombies for 4 gutterbones just so you have more creatures you can sacrifice plus his ability to just come back to hand

  • @toab77
    @toab77 5 років тому

    I feel like this deck would be just as good, or better, without the priests and one more Judith? Maybe some Rekindling Phoenixes?

    • @toab77
      @toab77 5 років тому

      @@surfincedarsamurai7341 yeah... Taking the budget into consideration it might not be possible in paper. But on arena the budget would be roughly the same. Just a few less rare wildcards and a few more mythic ones :)

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      Rekindling Phoenix could be good, either in the main deck or sideboard. I'm not sure about more Judiths. I like Priest and there's some risky we flood out with Mayhem Devils and Judiths if we keep adding more (and they aren't that good without a sac outlet).

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      Also, on Arena you get a Rekindling Phoenix for free from the new player thing, so we might as well add it).

    • @toab77
      @toab77 5 років тому

      @@MTGGoldfish I can't remember but I think you activated Priest maybe once in all those games? Hence my original thought. Maybe Fireblade Artist could be an alternative aggro sacrifice outlet?

  • @aeonsiege1806
    @aeonsiege1806 5 років тому +3

    Please do a non-budget aristocrats

    • @melvinfz0301
      @melvinfz0301 5 років тому

      Aeon Siege Add Blood Crypt, Gutterbones instead of Fanatical, Midnight Reaper to draw some cards (and die in the process) and 2 more Judith. Personally I don't like Bontu, sure the guy is sick if you have a huge board, but if you don't, it's a dead card, I prefeer Rekindling Phoenix to finish up the job. Also I better go for Bedevil over Heartfire.

    • @Novenae_CCG
      @Novenae_CCG 5 років тому

      If you add white, you also get additional options, like Cruel Celebrant.
      BTW, Bontu is a girl.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      Maybe we'll try Mardu Aristocrats on stream.

  • @jonathanstudentkit
    @jonathanstudentkit 5 років тому

    are you not in mythic?

  • @tsuki7064
    @tsuki7064 5 років тому

    Why lazotep reaver when you could have played that 1 mana 1/1 fs that amasses when dies

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      Reaver is nice since it gives us two bodies to sacrifice immediately.

    • @tsuki7064
      @tsuki7064 5 років тому

      @@MTGGoldfish yea true but if you can sac both immediately isnt grim initiate also gives us 2 bodies? well one downside would be bontu since he needs to sac all things at the same time. maybe not reaver but the goblin can be replaced. it is cool as it is too tho really enjoyed your video

  • @SparTadepT
    @SparTadepT 5 років тому

    40:45 You know there's another mode on that card right? Discard 2 of your best cards instead if just 1 to draw 3 unknowns. Seth... You've got a card draw problem.

    • @SparTadepT
      @SparTadepT 5 років тому

      Just got to the end of the match, wasn't hindsight, you're just addicted to drawing cards :P

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      I do like drawing cards :)

  • @davidsmeltzer551
    @davidsmeltzer551 5 років тому

    Wanting to see non budget modern version since all the additions have coke out.

  • @Obsydiian
    @Obsydiian 5 років тому +2

    Oh Seth....
    How you couldn't be patient for 1 turn and decided to spectacle your creature instead of just playing her and keeping 1 of the 2 Bontus in your hand. How the punishment for greed seeps into your pores and extracts the salt in heaps... Lol

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      Yeah. Would have been better to just rummage and not spectacle.

    • @Obsydiian
      @Obsydiian 5 років тому +1

      @@MTGGoldfish No worries bud, we love ya 💕

  • @tiagopombal2028
    @tiagopombal2028 5 років тому

    Whit gods you should play duress. If it’s discarded it doesn’t return to library...

    • @P13rr0t73fu0
      @P13rr0t73fu0 5 років тому

      Duress is for instant and sorcery no creatures p

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      Sadly Duress only hits non-creatures. Maybe this deck could use Drill Bit.

  • @alexnas9634
    @alexnas9634 5 років тому

    i mean i love the deck and i like the video however this isnt budget on arena lol most of the cards you need are rares lol also @30:01 you should of used heart fire when he played the llanowar elf saccing torch fiend 4 dmg to branchwalker the feind pings llanowar, you attack to kill dav.

  • @knightofthenorth926
    @knightofthenorth926 5 років тому

    I want someone to make a bot to automatically play mono red. Probably hard to do, but it would be pretty funny.

  • @zandersquest2850
    @zandersquest2850 5 років тому +1

    Rakdos AggroSacs..... Am I wrong ? haha

  • @welersoncarvalho4245
    @welersoncarvalho4245 5 років тому

    30:20 Heartfire sac footlight fiend ping the elf and kill the other elf... attack davriel for 2 and you still have 2 creatures on the board... WHY ATTACK LIKE THAT AND LOSE EVERYTHING OMG LOL... I'm more annoyed about this then i should be honestly...

  • @risherapocalypse
    @risherapocalypse 5 років тому +1

    Bonut.

  • @victoriachusin2944
    @victoriachusin2944 5 років тому

    call the deck rakdos sacro
    aggro+ sacrifice= sacro

  • @mad_max21
    @mad_max21 5 років тому +1

    God Eternal Donut.

  • @alexandrecardoso5835
    @alexandrecardoso5835 5 років тому

    29:54 daravel

  • @happywesley
    @happywesley 5 років тому

    Why Seth? Why did you ruin my secret deck by showing it to the internet..now I need to create a new one :P

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      If you make a new one, make sure to let me know so I can play it for a video :)

  • @prosperwaldmann6954
    @prosperwaldmann6954 5 років тому

    Why wouldn’t he let butcher die and kill priest

  • @BrunoNunes83
    @BrunoNunes83 5 років тому

    remove 2 lazotep reaver, 1 tibalt, 1 rix maadi reveler, put 4 fireblade artist. much better.

    • @BrunoNunes83
      @BrunoNunes83 5 років тому

      or maybe remove 1 priest instead of reveler...

  • @travisdevries5023
    @travisdevries5023 5 років тому

    Bonut

  • @Skywarp2099
    @Skywarp2099 5 років тому +1

    I'm not sure I can count the number of times, Seth, you've either A.) Thrown a game or B.) come close to throwing a game because of your reckless and impulsive need to draw cards. What's worse, you'd rather ignore long-term gains over short-term losses. Please, for the love of God man, play a few decks that have NO WAY of gaining card advantage. You draw your one card per turn and that's it because you seriously need an intervention.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      I'm pretty upfront about the fact that I'd rather draw cards and die than not draw cards and win ;)

    • @Skywarp2099
      @Skywarp2099 5 років тому

      @@MTGGoldfish Oh, I'm well aware, but the number of self-inflicted losses because of unnecessary punts skews the results of decks' records. It's almost as bad as when you forget that cards have text on them beyond the first line or two. (Bolas's Citadel ring any bells?)

  • @morecirnothancirno
    @morecirnothancirno 5 років тому

    DANARVEL

  • @jamescoulson2225
    @jamescoulson2225 5 років тому

    SAFRON ROFL

  • @benzpinto
    @benzpinto 5 років тому

    magic and its fugly land luck variance makes me puke

  • @Ricardo8388
    @Ricardo8388 5 років тому

    Should really change the channel name to mute sound and see my misplays.

  • @TheSailorKing
    @TheSailorKing 5 років тому +1

    Frenzy is bad in this deck
    Rix maadi reveler is just garbage

  • @airhedge
    @airhedge 5 років тому

    first

  • @hansonkenny9912
    @hansonkenny9912 5 років тому

    dude cant admit he made a misplay

    • @michapiwowarski4834
      @michapiwowarski4834 5 років тому

      Hanson Kenny no one forces you to watch

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      I think I said it was probably wrong to spectacle, but sometimes it's hard to tell with the benefit of hindsight (obviously turned out poorly, but we didn't know we were going to end up with 10 lands or draw three lands off the spectacle when we were making the decision).

    • @hansonkenny9912
      @hansonkenny9912 5 років тому

      @@michapiwowarski4834 no one forces you to comment on someone's post that you'll never see but you do it anyways

  • @juliancurtis8064
    @juliancurtis8064 5 років тому

    How did that burn player make it into plat...he’s soooo bad. So many misplays

    • @christopherwoodbury7520
      @christopherwoodbury7520 5 років тому

      Strength of the deck and 90% of the time you either win by turn 5 or scoop to control so the deck usually plays itself.