Budget Magic: $58 Spirits (Standard, Magic Arena)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 108

  • @cjsydloski7510
    @cjsydloski7510 5 років тому +7

    Seth @ 34:44 - "OP has gotta be running out of action"
    OP: "Hold my beer"

  • @Ghost26968
    @Ghost26968 5 років тому +16

    I'm so ready for wildgrowth walker to rotate.

  • @CSDragon
    @CSDragon 5 років тому +29

    "This deck (Sultai) doesn't have sweepers right?"
    I can already hear the Always Sunny music. "Seth walks into Finality/Ritual of Soot"

    • @DarkX64
      @DarkX64 5 років тому

      Mr Blue Sky plays as Seth's face just drains of any happiness. "Oh...oh it does..." *Hey hey, mister blue. We're so pleased to be with you*

  • @b1zarr01
    @b1zarr01 5 років тому +46

    "Spirits have been floating around Standard... " I see what you did there 😂

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +11

      I was channeling my inner tomer.

  • @dziewon2866
    @dziewon2866 5 років тому +39

    Why don't you play Gain Lands instead of Gates?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +77

      This is a good question.

    • @gbort1
      @gbort1 5 років тому +2

      Tradition at this point lol

  • @FrowningTable
    @FrowningTable 5 років тому +42

    58 dollars, 58 minutes

    • @zigzag2370
      @zigzag2370 5 років тому +2

      58 minutes ago

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +16

      Good thing that doesn't happen for non-budget decks :)

    • @FrowningTable
      @FrowningTable 5 років тому

      MTGGoldfish lol

    • @TheQueerLeaf
      @TheQueerLeaf 5 років тому

      And 5 seconds

    • @hidro2353
      @hidro2353 5 років тому +1

      Balanced, as all things should be...

  • @Gnarly_Bard
    @Gnarly_Bard 5 років тому +1

    @43:35 "we want our spirits alive" lmao

  • @Starkiller3025
    @Starkiller3025 5 років тому +16

    Could've had hallowed fountains instead of the gates and it would still be budget.

  • @JamesBonedOO7
    @JamesBonedOO7 5 років тому +15

    When will you start listing the number of commons/uncommons/rares/mythics for arena?

    • @jekanyika
      @jekanyika 5 років тому +3

      I agree it would ne nice, but you can see the breakdown if you click on the MTGGoldfish link.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +15

      If you look at the decklist or article you can see the breakdown, hopefully they will be on the deck tech too in the not too distant future.

  • @thecollectiblecollectabill2298
    @thecollectiblecollectabill2298 5 років тому +6

    i just bought a $5 code for the mu yanling deck because it comes with 4 spectral sailors and a few Winged Words and I didnt want to waste my wildcards

  • @Warlothar
    @Warlothar 5 років тому +15

    Sephara is for a deck with more one mana creatures. You can't play sephara turn 3 never, you are probably not going to cast her turn 4 with 4 one drops and 8 2 mana creature drops. You would require a good curve and they don't have to kill any of your creatures. You could play sephara turn 5 which is not so powerful and for turn 5 is easy to get a kaya's wrath or anything to clean the board or simply some more expensive removal than shock. I'm playing an uw flyers all in and it is good, but if you don't have a lot of one mana drops better dont play it.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      The all in plan sounds interesting, but I wonder about the games where we don't draw sephara.

    • @gustavowadaslopes2479
      @gustavowadaslopes2479 5 років тому

      @@MTGGoldfish She would probably be better with Lingering Souls or with Green ramp.
      And she's insane with Spark Double or Helm of the Host

    • @Warlothar
      @Warlothar 5 років тому +3

      @@MTGGoldfish that's why it is called an all in plan, you get an anthem or mass buff effect and you try to kill your opponent asap, or sephara. It is an ok deck, i was able to get some rank in platinum, nothing spectacular, it is not good against any control decks with mass removal.

  • @yoshipopolsku6560
    @yoshipopolsku6560 5 років тому +1

    Love this deck, I will make it tomorrow

  • @melissagrenier2200
    @melissagrenier2200 5 років тому +2

    People criticize you for keeping 1 land hands but your 1 land keeps are (in my opinion) often correct. What's a lot worse are hands like the one you kept in game 2 against vampires. That was a snap mulligan. The hand just didn't do anything without white mana and you only had 14 sources to draw into out of 53 cards remaining. I pulled up the hypergeometric calculator and the odds of having a white source in the top 5 cards is only about 80% (rounded up from 79.99365784%).

  • @moocowpong1
    @moocowpong1 5 років тому +1

    The Phoenix deck hadn't even drawn any Frys yet. They weren't even close to out of removal.

  • @RockThisCrib
    @RockThisCrib 5 років тому +1

    Deck needs 4 Rally of Wings. Its been a powerhouse in my fliers deck, winning on turn 4 consistently, good as a surprise block too.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      It does seem like it could be good. I'll have to give it a shot.

  • @Mastblood
    @Mastblood 5 років тому +2

    Was unclaimed territory too expensive?

  • @swiftdragonrider
    @swiftdragonrider 5 років тому +11

    Bording in a card that req 4 flayers in play against the decks with a ton of removal seems not that great.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      Yeah, that might have been ambitious.

  • @irou95
    @irou95 5 років тому +6

    why not ixalans binding against drakes? if you bind crackles they have no way of winning the game if you draw gravehate the deck only has 2 wincons

  • @ToTheNines87368
    @ToTheNines87368 5 років тому +2

    Not that different from the flyers deck I’m messing around with lately. It has a couple of planes walkers though and more one drops.
    My only problem is I’m so saturated at the 3 mana spot, so much good stuff at that cost.

  • @diegoreyna3636
    @diegoreyna3636 5 років тому

    Pretty sweet deck

  • @zotha
    @zotha 5 років тому +2

    'Hopefully there is not another Lava Coil'... Narrator's voice 'there was another Lava Coil'

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      There's always another Lava Coil.

  • @septred3
    @septred3 5 років тому

    Hey Seth how come the card Quasiduplicate was not in the deck because that would have made the deck even better?

    • @cacs2201
      @cacs2201 5 років тому

      Pretty sure it is too expensive (manawise) for the deck

  • @Nollland
    @Nollland 5 років тому +1

    This video made me realize how much I like the face cam

  • @Sey318
    @Sey318 5 років тому +1

    Any reason not playing Tranquil Cove over the gates?

  • @AquarianRevolution
    @AquarianRevolution 5 років тому

    I find the deck exciting. Would you play it in paper?

  • @shepherd090
    @shepherd090 5 років тому

    Deck Idea: Jeskai Hero, Kykar, and saheeli deck would be a cool one to show off.

  • @MixedChaosCF
    @MixedChaosCF 5 років тому +1

    Should've played phantom in the first round game one to keep dungeon a secret for game two

  • @buddatello
    @buddatello 5 років тому +20

    Budget in anything but arena 18 rares

    • @DanielEvanClarke
      @DanielEvanClarke 5 років тому +4

      yeah, hardly budget for arena where rares are far more valuable than mythics

  • @StarReacher
    @StarReacher 5 років тому +1

    Did he ever drew a card with the spectral sailors?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      Not too often, but it's really good when it happens.

  • @koshi6505
    @koshi6505 5 років тому

    10:30 Tron-or Guard?

  • @themagicgeek4765
    @themagicgeek4765 5 років тому

    What would be your thoughts on putting in Unclaimed Territory? To clunky with the non-spirits in the 75?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      I think a couple copies as a backup dual land could be fine. If you're building on Arena and trying to avoid rares/mythic a full playset could work.

    • @themagicgeek4765
      @themagicgeek4765 5 років тому

      @@MTGGoldfish I just kinda figured especially in some situations in your matches that if you had Territory instead of a basic, you could've either curved out better or gotten closer to winning the match or game

  • @gman963
    @gman963 5 років тому

    How does this stack up against mono-blue? Also budget and seems more efficient and reliable than a two color deck that does basically the same thing.

    • @swiftdragonrider
      @swiftdragonrider 5 років тому +2

      Mono blue is a complitly diffrent deck. That deck is a tempo deck with a ton of disraption this is a agro deck aming to smash face hard and fast.

  • @thibautmaignan1032
    @thibautmaignan1032 5 років тому

    Do u think ur Phoenix is again a good deck with the new coreset ?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      It seems playable, although it didn't get many big upgrades (other than some removal spells).

    • @thibautmaignan1032
      @thibautmaignan1032 5 років тому

      @@MTGGoldfish thank for ur response. I love ur work (the temur free spells and niv mizzet reborn decks all good greedy deck

  • @jakonovski
    @jakonovski 5 років тому

    A lovely budget deck for anything but Arena, getting all those jank rares would be painful.

  • @Riv_ilio
    @Riv_ilio 5 років тому +1

    thanks

  • @DavidSanchez-de3cc
    @DavidSanchez-de3cc 5 років тому

    Why no Ugin?

  • @crovax1375
    @crovax1375 5 років тому

    I think that it was the card draw that pushed Izzet over the top for that one match up

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      They can draw a lot of cards, that's for sure.

    • @crovax1375
      @crovax1375 5 років тому +1

      @@MTGGoldfish maybe a Narset in the sideboard can help to slow them down for that match up

  • @diobrando5896
    @diobrando5896 5 років тому

    m 19 and m 2020 are both in standard?

    • @cacs2201
      @cacs2201 5 років тому

      Untill the rotation, yes

  • @haydenrhardy1204
    @haydenrhardy1204 5 років тому

    Are you gonna do a non-budget version?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      Maybe for a stream (there's a list in the article though in the meantime).

  • @Soulryu11
    @Soulryu11 5 років тому

    I basically run this deck too, but have 2 copies of sephara in the main deck

    • @jzoobs
      @jzoobs 5 років тому +1

      Do you find you're able to cast Sephara consistently? I figured it'd be hard to keep four creatures on the board against Red where it really matters.

  • @ianrockefeller3182
    @ianrockefeller3182 5 років тому

    Top deck jadelight ranger into unsummon, feels bad man

  • @IamAdamWe
    @IamAdamWe 5 років тому +1

    MMMMMMMMMMMbudget magic

  • @Saber_Outdoors
    @Saber_Outdoors 5 років тому

    I would splash red for deafing clarion also why are we not playing sky tether to remove a blocker or threat. Sky blade is to combat control not burn

  • @lewchootrain
    @lewchootrain 5 років тому

    Then you throw in Shalai for the double indestructible

  • @zacharymccutcheon8607
    @zacharymccutcheon8607 5 років тому

    Cerulean drake!

  • @MikeB-dn5li
    @MikeB-dn5li 5 років тому

    40:55 should’ve used your mana to draw an extra card with your 1 drop. Didn’t matter but it still made me cringe that you missed that

  • @Keldonlord
    @Keldonlord 5 років тому +7

    oh no, you mean flyers with removal beats flyers without removal? how 1990s of you

  • @IonObliv
    @IonObliv 5 років тому

    Suuuupreeeeme ffffantom

  • @Holden_Prio
    @Holden_Prio 5 років тому +1

    Careful don’t click the cat!!!!

  • @leesalt
    @leesalt 5 років тому +1

    I love you Seth, but why in the world do you think this deck can compete against Phoenix? Phoenix runs nothing but removal/burn, a million ways to recur that removal and draw more removal and only 8 creatures of import. You have 7 mana removal and chump blockers

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      We have graveyard hate and potentially a fast clock, but maybe that isn't enough.

    • @leesalt
      @leesalt 5 років тому

      @@MTGGoldfish I think the biggest thing is that 8 of your lords aren't creatures. If you take time to get them down first to prevent your creatures from dying,, you'll be too slow to do anything. I think mb gy hate is a nice gotcha in best of 1 but a good phoenix player will adjust to playing without relying heavily on the gy once they see it.

    • @BasketballLover312
      @BasketballLover312 5 років тому

      Phoenix isnt getting creatures out until turn 4 almost ever so taking off turns to play anthems isn't unreasonable. Then 4 hard to kill geists, 4 exile removal for late game.. Cutting off graveyard and I think you bring in binding for the drakes. On the other hand, you can just race in some games. Unsummon can help dodge removal as well.. I think spirits should have a decent matchup as well.

  • @mikesmith344
    @mikesmith344 5 років тому

    Hey Seth. Can you start producing some Historic content. I would like to get a heads up on the possible meta game.

    • @gustavowadaslopes2479
      @gustavowadaslopes2479 5 років тому

      Historic will only apear after archery, and would be interesting to try some curious builds between archery and Ixalan/Dominaria, but until them standard should be some what similar to it

    • @frankomancer
      @frankomancer 5 років тому +1

      Just look at the current meta and ignore the fall set. That’s what Historic will be.

    • @gustavowadaslopes2479
      @gustavowadaslopes2479 5 років тому +1

      @@frankomancer The current meta is the previous meta plus the last set.
      Historic will be different. Maybe not much, but if core set gave room to more decks, them archery may introduce new tools for them, or even bring new decks.
      And that's after just 1 set, so it should rank up in differences quite fast.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому +1

      At this point Historic is literally current Standard, so decks that are good in Standard will likely be good in Historic too. After we get the fall spoilers I'll try to work something up (although I'd guess it will still mostly resemble current Standard for the short term at least).

    • @gustavowadaslopes2479
      @gustavowadaslopes2479 5 років тому +1

      @@MTGGoldfish Considering Core 2019 managed to shift standard a bit, there might a slightly difference at the start.

  • @anonymoususer69
    @anonymoususer69 5 років тому +1

    I feel like when you do a budget video then it should be budget on the platform on which you are playing. This is very budget on paper and MTGO but a normal number of rares for a brew, probably high for most people

  • @aspasia3
    @aspasia3 5 років тому

    200k!

  • @matthewbloss6150
    @matthewbloss6150 5 років тому

    spook force one strikes again

  • @iwakuralain3064
    @iwakuralain3064 5 років тому

    "Spectral Spirit"

  • @IzudeDarkwolf
    @IzudeDarkwolf 5 років тому +1

    By now your intro has falsified itself lol Your going to have to switch the order XD

  • @walrusassociation9317
    @walrusassociation9317 5 років тому

    No offence my fine fellow, but I don't think anyone's choice of where to stop is going to be affected by a sticker.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 років тому

      It's more of a bonus than anything :)

  • @howdidigethere4855
    @howdidigethere4855 5 років тому +2

    First

  • @18zach86
    @18zach86 5 років тому

    Cardkingdom sells fake cards guys so make sure you check every card you get. Better yet don't risk it and buy from somewhere else.