Major Physics Discoveries of 2021 That Transformed Our Understanding - Video Compilation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 417

  • @dadogwitdabignose
    @dadogwitdabignose 3 місяці тому +23

    I fell asleep watching vsauce and woke up with this video finished and I think I now have a P.H.D. in Physics

  • @exspiravit123
    @exspiravit123 3 роки тому +68

    I love these multi hour long videos. I'd rather watch this over t.v any day

    • @Sawedoff53
      @Sawedoff53 3 роки тому +5

      Yes! I just keep watching and watching

    • @WilmsIsBoss
      @WilmsIsBoss 3 роки тому +2

      Me too!

    • @randal_gibbons
      @randal_gibbons 3 роки тому +1

      There is very little on . that keeps my interest. It's UA-cam or nothing for me as well.

    • @tamikellercapotorto
      @tamikellercapotorto Рік тому

      ❤ AMEN! I quit tv 12 yrs ago

  • @alexinulla7839
    @alexinulla7839 3 роки тому +132

    We love you Anton, thank you. It's so obvious you are in it for the science and that level of purity is so hard to find these days

    • @chrisayad0
      @chrisayad0 3 роки тому +4

      yeeah

    • @sparkle1596
      @sparkle1596 3 роки тому +1

      i love it as well! :)

    • @numbersix8919
      @numbersix8919 3 роки тому +2

      Anton is definitely in it for the science.

    • @alexinulla7839
      @alexinulla7839 3 роки тому +3

      @@numbersix8919 it's so uncorrupted, my mind never feels forced

    • @andys3035
      @andys3035 3 роки тому +1

      I love you too

  • @benmooney280
    @benmooney280 3 роки тому +6

    4 hours and no ads. That is awesome thank you so much you wonderful person

  • @steenro
    @steenro 3 роки тому +32

    Dear Anton, you are simply amazing. This compilation is brilliant. Thank you for your great job.

  • @malformedsol
    @malformedsol 3 роки тому +8

    Anton, I am always telling people about your channel. I love what you do, and how you go about explaining it.

  • @emmanuelweinman9673
    @emmanuelweinman9673 3 роки тому +95

    “completely unrelated, although maybe somewhat related” 😂 basically sums up our relationship with the universe.

    • @cravinadventure
      @cravinadventure 3 роки тому +14

      I read this exactly coincidentally at the exact time it played aloud in the video... I could also say to this, "completely unrelated, although maybe somewhat related”

    • @emmanuelweinman9673
      @emmanuelweinman9673 3 роки тому +8

      @@cravinadventure coincidence or synchronicity? the world may never know

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 3 роки тому

      @Jerry Polverino WHY AND HOW ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity IN A BALANCED FASHION CONSISTENT WITH E=MC2 AND F=MA (ON BALANCE):
      E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. THE EARTH/ground AND what is THE SUN are CLEARLY (and necessarily) E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! INDEED, TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.) The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. SO, consider the man who is actually in outer "space" in comparison with the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. This means that the FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE is directly proportional to (or BALANCED with) the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Carefully consider the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE !!!
      Get a good look at the BLUE SKY. THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. Get a good look at what is THE EYE !!!!! Consider the man who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Balanced BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE is the reason that objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.) "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!!!!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand !!! Think QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!!!!!!!!! GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Accordingly, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/AS E=MC2, F=ma, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. (The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !!!) It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy !!! Again, also consider what is the speed of light (c). BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand !!!
      IMPORTANTLY, what is THE EARTH/ground (a PLANET) is a BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE form or relation; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider what is the speed of light (c).
      By Frank DiMeglio

    • @numbersix8919
      @numbersix8919 3 роки тому +3

      @@frankdimeglio8216 You know what it means when it all makes sense, right?

    • @jtmikalic5560
      @jtmikalic5560 3 роки тому +1

      @@cravinadventure I just read what you said and he said "completely unrelated, although maybe somewhat related”

  • @DevGood
    @DevGood 3 роки тому +10

    No matter how bad this year would be, it brought a lot of scientific discoveries 💥

  • @Nietzsche_K_Gote
    @Nietzsche_K_Gote 3 роки тому +16

    hey Anton thanks a ton my man … got someone as uncultered as me your videos add perspective to my imagination and reality.

  • @slamrn9689
    @slamrn9689 3 роки тому +5

    Thanks for putting these out - I hope the move is going well.

  • @rkaiser7767
    @rkaiser7767 3 роки тому +10

    Anton, I love the way that you explain so that it is possible to understand science, physics, astrophysics.

  • @nathanfuelling2577
    @nathanfuelling2577 2 роки тому +4

    Love the long video compilations. I always learn a ton of new stuff even when re watching videos I've seen already, but especially when i catch ones i somehow missed and when you include older videos that are still relevant. My only complaint is that (because of my super procrastination ability) I never seem motivated to finally click on the link in the description below (which I keep telling myself I'm going to do) untill I start watching THESE videos and then, because I have ADD I'll forget I'm watching a compilation video and I'll ACTUALLY try to click on link only after I've paused it to then realize my folly. But I know you couldn't possibly add that many links to these compilation videos so no worries.
    Perhaps when I finally finish all these great compilation videos you've made I'll go visit the rest of your play lists and delve even deeper into this rich environment of knowledge that you have made available to us all. Thanks again for helping us get through the pandemic with awsome, informative, and positive no b.s or conspiracy theory content in these times of misinformation. You're my you tube hero.

  • @Cats.in.Tuxedos
    @Cats.in.Tuxedos 5 місяців тому

    Keep pushing Anton....great work...don't burn out !

  • @FaterialL
    @FaterialL 3 роки тому +18

    thanks for uploading these, I typically am looking for something to listen to the audio of during my 12 hour shift..

    • @PainfulRenegade
      @PainfulRenegade 3 роки тому +2

      I swap coins all day long... 24h shift... 😥😉

    • @FaterialL
      @FaterialL 3 роки тому +2

      @@PainfulRenegade hahah wish i had that luxury, Saving up to start mining coins ;)

  • @Taffeyboy
    @Taffeyboy 3 роки тому +10

    Excellent presentation Anton.

  • @i-am-evil-morty6710
    @i-am-evil-morty6710 2 роки тому +269

    Science me till I sleep buddy

    • @francislee174
      @francislee174 9 місяців тому +15

      Fr

    • @nicholaswood7704
      @nicholaswood7704 9 місяців тому +24

      I'm glad I'm not the only one I fell asleep to Anton last night as well

    • @nicholaswood7704
      @nicholaswood7704 9 місяців тому +12

      And that's a compliment I'd like the way that you said it signs me till I sleep buddy it's awesome I just like to listen to him while I lay there and try to sleep it's great

    • @NeuroScientician
      @NeuroScientician 8 місяців тому +10

      I'm falling asleep listening to him every day for over a year now

    • @pappymcmcmc
      @pappymcmcmc 8 місяців тому

      😂

  • @mscir
    @mscir 3 роки тому +6

    Best science classes ever. I hope you will consider doing a whole video on entanglement one day. Cheers.

  • @ThePhysicalReaction
    @ThePhysicalReaction 9 місяців тому

    Anton this is a great replay. Your voice puts me to sleep. In a good way. And my doggos love soace talk

  • @bsbusterbsbuster463
    @bsbusterbsbuster463 3 роки тому +2

    Since you started your lengthy compilations, I’ve missed my daily routine of watching your videos before going to bed. Your content is always interesting, but 3 hours is a lot!
    Impatiently waiting for you to go back to the usual.

    • @aceundead4750
      @aceundead4750 3 роки тому +1

      use these to fall asleep like white noise is the secret.

    • @Andrewkosche
      @Andrewkosche 3 роки тому +1

      Just go back and watch what you missed. I fee you but a lot of us love this compilation content too haha!

  • @edreusser4741
    @edreusser4741 3 роки тому +8

    I would bet that since this anomalous magnetic moment can be detected in a muon, it will eventually also be detected in an electron. Its just really small compared to the Muon.

  • @skoottek
    @skoottek 3 роки тому

    I hope you see this, you give me back my love for science anytime your videos come on

  • @ViCT0RiA6
    @ViCT0RiA6 3 роки тому +3

    Your voice is so calming and I'm so thankful for these videos 🙏

  • @Tigerbythetoe
    @Tigerbythetoe 3 роки тому +5

    Awesome stuff Anton! This compilation is a great way to get a bunch of inspiring info. I dig frontier science and new discoveries. I shared this video with a friend of mine. It’s so amazing and exciting knowing that so many brilliant people are working together every day to discover new ways to make our lives better, and help our planet. Your passion is palpable bro, thanks for sharing!

  • @mahelaniarektbb
    @mahelaniarektbb 3 роки тому

    Not a single P-P joke in the comments. I am disappoint.
    But honestly, thank you for these long compilations. I watch them all day :D

  • @shaneruetz5604
    @shaneruetz5604 3 роки тому +3

    Anton overload! haha I love it. Great refresher on things while I game.

  • @jjhhandk3974
    @jjhhandk3974 3 роки тому +2

    Muons can be used in scattered imaging to get more precise data than electrons. They are heavier so the spread is tighter.

  • @lucassmith4524
    @lucassmith4524 2 роки тому

    Working on up to a million subs. Congrats, Anton. :-)

  • @seanmiller1084
    @seanmiller1084 3 роки тому

    Anton you are a gem

  • @doobiedoo5450
    @doobiedoo5450 2 роки тому

    Anton, you’re the best.

  • @dragonfly4690
    @dragonfly4690 3 роки тому

    like the effect with the background & glasses on your tshirt

  • @stirgy4312
    @stirgy4312 3 роки тому

    Dude, take a drink once in awhile! Subscribed. 👍

  • @h.barkas1571
    @h.barkas1571 3 роки тому +4

    Pretty interesting stuff you're talking about. Especially the possibility of a communication network using gravitational waves caught my imagination.

  • @letsfixit1594
    @letsfixit1594 3 роки тому

    Brilliant as always.

  • @jimgardner4318
    @jimgardner4318 Рік тому

    Anton, you are just beautiful and a wonderful person! Thank you for enriching my knowledge.

  • @TheEnigmaUniverse-vt2pm
    @TheEnigmaUniverse-vt2pm 11 місяців тому

    Your content never fails to amaze me and ignite my hunger for knowledge about the universe. Thank you for sparking my curiosity.

  • @tonylalangue6243
    @tonylalangue6243 3 роки тому +6

    I did a muon mean life experiment in the lab. My university made detectors for CERN So they were easy to obtain.
    It still required voltages of 1000 volts on the three detectors, and about a month or more (we did it over Christmas), in spite of the large numbers of muons.

    • @Tetarkall
      @Tetarkall 3 роки тому +2

      So what were your findings?! That's pretty cool!

    • @tonylalangue6243
      @tonylalangue6243 3 роки тому +1

      @@Tetarkall
      We measured it. Duh.

    • @samsungtelevision695
      @samsungtelevision695 3 роки тому +2

      @@tonylalangue6243 I assume you used similar precision when reporting to whomever approved your use of the equipment. You’re like “we measured it duh” meanwhile you’ve built the worlds most elaborate vape out of high dollar parts.

    • @tonylalangue6243
      @tonylalangue6243 3 роки тому +1

      I noticed some clueless responses here from those who, in all likelihood never took physics beyond high school, if at all. I am not about to search out my lab book. It was a relatively mundane experiment, resulting in a bell curve of life times, and one of five required experiments needed to complete the requirements of the course. The equipment was set up so that those wishing to do so had access to it.

    • @Tetarkall
      @Tetarkall 3 роки тому +2

      @@tonylalangue6243 Right, so I was asking what the bell curve you recorded found. You posted your story, I was interested, yet you don’t care. Cool…

  • @xetrius3671
    @xetrius3671 3 роки тому +3

    [53:10] Might want to look at from two different perspectives could be that the gold is an internal reflection while the silver is an external reflection as seems to be the case when I try to understand the two different mirages, convex and concave.

  • @silvertiger2801
    @silvertiger2801 3 роки тому +1

    Wow! Didn't know that it went past Ice9. Pretty cool Anton, pretty cool. Ice 19 now? Amazing!

    • @williamswenson5315
      @williamswenson5315 2 роки тому

      It wouldn't have, but none of the scientists thought to throw it into the ocean.

  • @freehat2722
    @freehat2722 Рік тому +1

    1:41:00 Using the term compound bow can be misleading. Although somewhat correct, being constructed from various materials, compound bows today use cams, levers and pulleys.

  • @atsylor5549
    @atsylor5549 3 роки тому +9

    I just found this guys channel and I subscribed about 10-15 mins in to this video. I like listening to him just as much as Neil Degrass Tyson.

    • @markrix
      @markrix Рік тому

      Man u missed out 😭😭😭

    • @xl_JAKE_lx
      @xl_JAKE_lx 2 місяці тому

      Anton is way more in depth than that ndgt flake. Pbs spacetime is also excellent along with about half a dozen other channels.

    • @atsylor5549
      @atsylor5549 2 місяці тому

      @@xl_JAKE_lx pundit really matter. It’s all about learning something you didn’t know regardless of the source

  • @craig2188
    @craig2188 3 роки тому

    Excellent videos Anton

  • @Reynoldsrobert
    @Reynoldsrobert 3 роки тому +1

    Are muons conductive in any specific and focused way, like through copper wire??? Anton?

  • @rogerwilco8146
    @rogerwilco8146 8 місяців тому

    Im in Oak Ridge and part of a small group still dedicated to getting a T reactor up and running. The graphite reactor here could be converted safely in just under 20 years.

  • @benmcreynolds8581
    @benmcreynolds8581 3 роки тому +1

    Does the PP cycle have a steady flow? Or does the PP cycle shrivel up or grow from excitement sometimes or does the PP cycle have a mind of its own?

    • @KSparks80
      @KSparks80 3 роки тому

      Umm, excuse me. But, dude? Is your comment actually a quiet, and painfully lonely, plea for help? Maybe with YOUR CHRONIC ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION? HUH? lol

  • @woodpigeon7776
    @woodpigeon7776 2 роки тому

    I had a lovely, scientific sleep to this video. Big brain!

  • @1112viggo
    @1112viggo 3 роки тому +1

    Great video Anton you are my new favorite Russian after Boris Yeltsin of course.

  • @josephknurek7795
    @josephknurek7795 3 роки тому

    Incredible video, loved it.

  • @stevenwoods8267
    @stevenwoods8267 3 роки тому

    Whoa thank you sir, I'll be watching this over a few days but so fat its reallly interesting!

  • @Aaron-zu3xn
    @Aaron-zu3xn 3 роки тому +1

    can you make a video explaining the 5th force we're now looking for?

  • @jackrasmussen5222
    @jackrasmussen5222 3 роки тому

    Thank you Anton

  • @christopherayers1435
    @christopherayers1435 3 роки тому

    I have a question if you where to drop one atom of hydrogen in to the center of a circlierl magnetic ball with inner an outer shell spinning in opposite direction in a vacuum while hit with different level of sound going through all the spectrum of sound as well what would happen to the atom

  • @avasam06
    @avasam06 2 роки тому

    Would extracting work from brownian motion technically cool off the material?

  • @davidnelson2204
    @davidnelson2204 3 роки тому

    Ohhh... possible use case for that graphine battery / doped graphine. Don't know why I think this will work... but would there be any way to use 2 sheets of graphine. You pump pure CO2 in there and run a current between the sheets to give enough energy for the O2 to leave. The left over carbon would, I think, deposit on one of the graphine layers to make graphite. Remove the now grapite sheet and replace again with grapine to restart the process. Possible carbon capture technology?

  • @shanrafnezden7958
    @shanrafnezden7958 3 роки тому

    Anton, you pronounced the name of Christian Huygens almost just as the Dutch do! You are awesome, thanks...

  • @just_kos99
    @just_kos99 2 роки тому +1

    I wish you'd always use chapters in these compilations, so I can skip to the parts that interest me.

  • @glowingoak2634
    @glowingoak2634 3 роки тому

    Anton, how is your moving to the new place going?

  • @sama3033
    @sama3033 2 місяці тому

    Great program. My question on the ice segment. Could we even use these exotic ices out there in the universe.? Would they be drinkable for instance? Usable as fuel?

  • @elljorgo
    @elljorgo 3 роки тому

    Anton is the absolute best.

  • @JohnJewel
    @JohnJewel 5 місяців тому

    at 57:31 so the Universal exspansion theory is the point where the human invention can expand space AND fill it with every life providing element, TIME being the control used to expand space , sort of unfolding a box with light or the power that provides light, a positive Highlights, of Shadow light, which is faster than highlights which are visable, but for Human and living beings both preempt EXSISTANCE . Or in esoterical terms, A previous conciousness, followed by material conciousness, that is to say, everything conciouss in the material world.

  • @m1k3droid
    @m1k3droid 3 роки тому +1

    I dont know why you think the production of graphene is so small. Gratomic, for instance, is mass producing graphene in bulk for use in tires, replacing the lamplblack so tires last ten times longer and are more grippy.

    • @deadsi
      @deadsi 3 роки тому

      Might be wrong but doesn't look like those tires are out on the market or even ready to be released so it's at the same stage as 99 % of graphene projects

    • @m1k3droid
      @m1k3droid 3 роки тому

      @@deadsi They've produced tires that have proven to be as I said. The problem is nobody in the tire industry wants to participate because their revenue stream is based on the obsolescence caused by tires wearing out.

  • @oskarrecon8151
    @oskarrecon8151 3 роки тому

    lol,,, thank you Anton Petrov,, i am a wonderful person,, how nice of you to notice . you are wonderful too..

  • @JohnJewel
    @JohnJewel 5 місяців тому

    1:15:35 the graphic explains the theory of worm holes, the unsolved area in white would not be folded, to my mind it makes more sense that on side of the worm hole would have more gravity and would work much more like mercury wobbling , not stable. Mysterious matter called plasma, is alive and changes , probably like the water at different temperatures, so it's ephemeral would change , which may be the tangent related to another theory why would aliens do experiements on human reproductive and digestive componants. Well if their seed was a liquid, plasma that could be hybrided with human liquid, which is 90% of our body mass, then they are figuring out how to survive and evolve. Hence I do not believe in the big bang CLOCK and direction

  • @kylechin8706
    @kylechin8706 3 роки тому

    Thank you.

  • @mistyninjax
    @mistyninjax 4 місяці тому

    Can you research a great fiberglass replacement for the shell of an automotive vehicle?

  • @theojobse3341
    @theojobse3341 3 роки тому +1

    Ummm an archaeological discovery in a ship wreak is unexplained until recently, an instrument to calculate leap years and tidal change .

  • @wbiro
    @wbiro 3 роки тому +2

    I told my son that if he did not know what he wanted to do in life, take physics, then, after that, everything else will seem like play.
    He switched to computer science and got his Masters, and I then asked him if he was going to get his Doctorate, and he said, "Nope. I'm just going to spend all money I'm making." (sigh)

  • @p1nkfreud
    @p1nkfreud 3 роки тому +1

    4:23 I think I might be part Muon

  • @jcthe2nd
    @jcthe2nd Рік тому

    what about the hutchison affect of levitation

  • @GrimsBar
    @GrimsBar 3 роки тому

    The difference is time. The particles are in a forward time field, not a backward time field. Time and Antitime cancel out when you cross the boundary.

  • @seanparker4461
    @seanparker4461 Рік тому

    Just wanted to drop a comment to tell you how much I enjoy your content. And even though I've never met you, I love you. (Not in a weird way - in a "I'll drop what cash I have in your patreon if you ever need it" like the last time way.

  • @emmanuelweinman9673
    @emmanuelweinman9673 3 роки тому +1

    the properties of anions make me wonder if our particles are also quasi particles made from the interactions of higher dimensional particles

  • @MrPapamaci88
    @MrPapamaci88 3 роки тому +4

    Since I love Tolkien, my favorites are the Odd Radio Circles. Finally! Some real Orcs!

  • @wilfyboy45
    @wilfyboy45 9 місяців тому

    Anton...superglue was not invented to stick flesh...that was accidental. It originally came from an effort to make lightweight bombsights for aeroplanes. That project failed because it was so sticky but they soon found other uses!

  • @cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647
    @cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647 3 роки тому +1

    Hey wonderful person Anton, I have an idea for you why not set up an Amazon store for yourself?

  • @mortkebab2849
    @mortkebab2849 3 роки тому +1

    in your history of clocks, you omitted the invention of the spring-powered clock, which allowed the accurate time-keeping on ships for navigation.

  • @paulburney7250
    @paulburney7250 3 роки тому

    Are these testing facilities trying to deflect these muons away from the space where the actual experiment is running? Since they have an electric charge, it seems like it could be done. What are the effects on the experiment if the muons are not deflected?

  • @damirdze
    @damirdze 3 роки тому

    The capacity of the 1 V does not tell much unless you know how much current it sources.

  • @philipgvarner
    @philipgvarner 3 роки тому

    Absolutely love these videos Anton! So much content! You have inspired a love of astronomy in me, a lamen, with your clear observations of these complicated reports! Thank you wonderful person!

    • @nonsequitor
      @nonsequitor 3 роки тому

      Layman (or lay person)....👍👊😊 And 💯 agree with you!

    • @spoodlydoodler3552
      @spoodlydoodler3552 3 роки тому

      @@southwestadventures5508 so him making money doing what he enjoys is not a good thing? Go the f*ck away.

  • @timothy8426
    @timothy8426 3 роки тому

    Frequencies corkscrew through space and the spin is the drag of resistance of interactions of their continuous motion being slowed down. Interactions of frequencies create substance by compaction of wave lengths causing accumulated massive amounts of forced gathering of entanglement. Compatability of frequencies interlocking creating Gravitational force known as mass. The entanglement tightens the area of spiraling and spin, and reduces travel speed increasing force. The energy of force increases the spiraling spin resistance, turning fluid motion into interwoven, interlocking, frequencies to appear in solidity becoming interlocking motion in energy transference. Energy transference is the force necessary to push through the interwoven frequencies to continually travel on its course of directional travel. Gravitational force is space itself in resistance to itself. Churning into and out of existence from fluid motion to mass motion in degrees of entanglement. Every form of energy spirals in resistance. Free travel has no resistance. Force is the measurement of resistance needed to push through to continue its motion of frequencies. The force is the backing resistance of pushing through. Pushing a camel through the eye of a needle, without loosing the camel. The camel stays a camel in motion. It's just distorted when in forced resistance until passing through. Heat is accumulated force on the opposing side of push. Heat can be termed accumulated pressure.

  • @wilfriedvanhees
    @wilfriedvanhees 6 місяців тому

    @1:04:55 As far as I know, is water not on the periodic table of elements.

  • @renelaizer6518
    @renelaizer6518 3 роки тому

    I think we should look into quantum communication...

  • @franktriggs
    @franktriggs 3 роки тому

    So water now has FIVE states then. Liquid, Ice, Vapour, Exclusion Zone and this new heated form. Exclusion Zone or EZ water is when water is in contact with a hydrophilic surface, it excludes ALL contaminants and particles in an exclusion zone, changes the charge to highly negative. Called the fourth phase of water. It can also be made into a solid from the EZ state. French scientists are working on a new type of memory storage using the crystalline structure it creates as a solid. EZ water is a liquid at a wide range of temperatures, a solid when purified which crystallizes without freezing. Capable of storing huge amounts of digital memory in a much smaller area than silicon. Its potential uses could be transformative to technology.

  • @annfay6543
    @annfay6543 Місяць тому

    There was a PBS Nova episode where a team of scientists who utilized mu masons to examine the Great Pyramid at Giza. They found a major passageway never before detected.
    I am astonished that there is something I know that Anton doesn’t. Do anyone else remember this “Nova”?

  • @ronaldwhite1730
    @ronaldwhite1730 3 роки тому

    thank - you .

  • @caseyscott4893
    @caseyscott4893 3 роки тому

    Browning motion scaled into charging capacitor

  • @kwgm8578
    @kwgm8578 3 роки тому +5

    Anton, I can't get past your first story. Did you notice the error bars on the "data" from Fermilab?
    This is the one thing that really bugs me about modern theoretical physics. With a "filter" that eliminates 98% of the data, and a whole lotta handwaving, we have a "new force of nature" to cover any discrepancy in the numbers. We already have well over 100 new "constants" to fudge the Standard Model. With high power particle accelerators that generate billions of events, we have "filters," ie, software that selects those events that are "likely to be of interest." Then when I hear things like "The Standard Model is physics' most accurate theory and has been confirmed to ten decimal places or 0.0000000001", I roll my eyes because of the "cherry picking" of data and all those adjustments to make the numbers work. This kind of self- congratulatory hyperbole is what made men like Einstein and Planck so uncomfortable with the state of theoretical physics in their day. I wonder what they would have thought about the methodology being used to "confirm" particle physics theory since the 1960s, and the precision of repeatability with only two experiments "proving" g-2 (or Higgs on which the Nobel prizes were instantly awarded) when the error bars are so very wide?

  • @gerrie2477
    @gerrie2477 3 роки тому

    Hello Wonderful Anton :o)

  • @sollymadeit
    @sollymadeit 3 роки тому +1

    The reason why physics won’t evolve to be functional is because we almost exclusively refuse to acknowledge the exceptions in the standard models but we keep ignoring it even though it keeps creating constant divinations

  • @deadsi
    @deadsi 3 роки тому

    I dunno if putting an em drive in space is a good idea or a massive waste of energy but.. It seems like even in vacuum and with 0 g it would be hard to measure any thrust

  • @barienwhite1
    @barienwhite1 2 роки тому

    How accurate were clocks from ancient times?

  • @cashmoneypwns
    @cashmoneypwns 3 роки тому

    They may be colliding with stray virtual particles and gaining slight mass which creates a momentary degree of error when collecting data.

  • @theultimatereductionist7592
    @theultimatereductionist7592 3 роки тому +4

    1:48:40 Mice panicked for ONLY the FIRST FEW HOURS? That is a HELL of a long time for ANY creature to panic!
    Do not experiment on nonconsenting sentient being! Run the experiment on a flat-earther.

    • @mahelaniarektbb
      @mahelaniarektbb 3 роки тому +1

      That last part made my eyes well up from laughing haha

  • @jeffhogueison1656
    @jeffhogueison1656 8 місяців тому

    You can make a hydrogen atom using a proton and a muon instead of electron. Now these will fuse together in nuclear fusion quite easily since they can get rather close to each other before electrostatic repulsion kicks on. The rub is the muonic hydrogen will not last long because muons decay quickly. However there is a sneaky way to get them to live longer so they can fuse over unity. Has to do with realitive stability allowing muonic atoms to live longer 😊

  • @tcf70tyrannosapiensbonsai
    @tcf70tyrannosapiensbonsai 3 роки тому

    Hi Anton! Please help me. Until now I thought the lifespan of a muon is 2,2 microseconds. I didn't expect it to be useful for anything.

  • @GuidetteExpert
    @GuidetteExpert 3 роки тому

    Do you know if there is any particle that has the key to eternal life?

    • @KSparks80
      @KSparks80 3 роки тому +1

      They do exist. In fact, I have a few of them. I could sell one if you're interested. Think it over and let me know.
      And take your time. I'm not going anywhere! (wink wink)

    • @ICreatedU1
      @ICreatedU1 2 роки тому

      @@KSparks80 Haha! Underrated comment +1

  • @StraightOuttaPaddock
    @StraightOuttaPaddock 3 роки тому

    thank you Anton

  • @walternullifidian
    @walternullifidian Рік тому

    Getting energy from the Brownian motion of graphene is almost like getting energy from entropy! 🧠🖖

  • @benjaminstubblefield2637
    @benjaminstubblefield2637 2 роки тому

    Maybe there is a difference in atomic weight between positive and negative. If they were exactly the same, 1 wouldn’t be positive and 1 negative.

  • @jaimeduncan6167
    @jaimeduncan6167 3 роки тому

    I believe that if we want this videos to be educational, it's important to show the actual numbers. The big difference is super tinny, meaning it could also be a systemic error in the experiment, and that is not going to be solve by repeating the same experiment with the same systemic error 9 10 or on million times over.

  • @eokaila
    @eokaila Рік тому

    Anton is the common nominator of reality.