Rolex Submariner vs Rolex Sea Dweller 4000: Luxury Dive Watch Comparison and Watch Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 61

  • @TheRausing1
    @TheRausing1 2 роки тому +36

    I’ve had a 4000 for 7 years now. In my opinion it is the best watch Rolex has ever made. It the best of every world. I certainly don’t keep it in a safe though, it’s been all around the world with me, scuba diving and all.

    • @m3sixspeed824
      @m3sixspeed824 2 роки тому +3

      Yes sir! Love my SD4K. Under the radar aficionado watch. I’ve had mine 5 years and have yet to have anyone know what it is which is fine with me!

    • @TheRausing1
      @TheRausing1 2 роки тому +1

      @@m3sixspeed824 if we ever cross paths IRL, I’m sure we’ll both recognise each other’s fine taste in watches 😁🙏

    • @m3sixspeed824
      @m3sixspeed824 2 роки тому

      @@TheRausing1 👍 my man!

    • @Morrison9155
      @Morrison9155 2 роки тому +4

      I passed up the opportunity to buy one of the SDs a while back from a dealer… boy if I knew then what I knew now….

  • @jameshoward9700
    @jameshoward9700 2 роки тому +10

    The 116600 SD4k - perfection. The finest expression of the dive watch concept: professional tough, He capable, but still elegant and versatile. The later 43mm Sea-Dwellers are a travesty - mere bloated Subs!

  • @saymyname218
    @saymyname218 2 роки тому +4

    That Moser is one of the most beautiful Pilot watches that i have ever seen.

  • @garyboyle695
    @garyboyle695 2 роки тому +4

    Anyone else bored senseless with Rolex?

  • @ugaais
    @ugaais 2 роки тому +6

    SD 4000 for me these are tool watch’s and the 40MM face is a perfect size and depth rating make it a better choice IMO…I would choose the no date over the 43MM SD as I feel that’s model is too bulky…

    • @m3sixspeed824
      @m3sixspeed824 2 роки тому +2

      100% SD43 is too bulky and bad choice to tac on the cyclops.

  • @johncaron4888
    @johncaron4888 2 роки тому +2

    Tim, I never had an English teacher with a vocabulary as good as yours!

  • @lobserve1
    @lobserve1 2 роки тому +2

    That bracelet on the Moser, wow!

  • @tarjas
    @tarjas 2 роки тому +3

    Went down this exact same path with sub and SD4K. Was not happy with either until I ended up with a 126610LN - it really is almost perfect IMO. The sub maxicase just wasn't for me and I got the SD4K for the classic dimensions and no cyclops. SD4K was great but just too thick for my preference - rolled around on my wrist and didn't feel balanced. I tried a GMT but once you have a glidelock watch nothing else compares for wearability. I should have held onto the SD4K as I got it a very good price - Chrono24 has it up 43% from what I paid for it at JackRoad in 2018... live and learn!

  • @mehzabinnur
    @mehzabinnur Рік тому +1

    Is the case of the 4000 smaller “lug to lug “ compared to the sub ?

    • @impexRQ
      @impexRQ 10 місяців тому +1

      Yeah - the lugs are smaller and nicer on the SD4K- the case is unique for the SD4K as well which is smaller ….

  • @impexRQ
    @impexRQ 2 роки тому +2

    The SD4000 is perfection 👌🏻

  • @herbmerced7780
    @herbmerced7780 2 роки тому +2

    That Chopard LUC is very interesting!

  • @Leftystrat
    @Leftystrat 2 роки тому +2

    Had the sd 16600 sold it bought the 114060. Better fit on wrist for me personally Don’t need the date. Better bracelet. But the sd116600 is probably the best Rolex ever made in retrospect

  • @heeroy7
    @heeroy7 2 роки тому +6

    When I was looking for a Rolex I spent 2 years researching what I wanted to wear. I really like the Submariner but I needed a date but I hated the cyclops so the 14060/114060 and 16610/116610 were ruled out. Eventually I saw a video by Archieluxury talking about the Sea Dweller which was a model I didn't know about. In summer 2013 I was finally able to acquire a full set with all tags from a pastor who was selling it on eBay. I'll never sell this watch but I'd be lying if I said I wished I had waited to get the 116600 as it improves upon the issues with the 16600 which was the bracelet. Maybe prices will come down a little and I'll be able pick one up for a reasonable price.

    • @sirhodl5945
      @sirhodl5945 2 роки тому

      I wouldn't wait. They are increasing around 1500 a year tbh.

  • @hlee2
    @hlee2 2 роки тому +1

    It's so sad that not only are two unobtainable watches from the AD are being compared but also from the perspective of them being an investment piece. This is the state of Rolex in 2021.

  • @styx4947
    @styx4947 2 роки тому +1

    That Moser moonphase has just entered the running to be my Dress Watch Grail.

  • @ChristopherNegroni
    @ChristopherNegroni 2 роки тому +1

    Sd4000 is almost perfect. Once you see the end links bracelet transition it cannot be unseen 😀 speaking from personal experience. 114060 slim and beautiful. All you need

    • @tarjas
      @tarjas 2 роки тому +1

      Agree on the end links but the real deal breaker was the thickness/balance for me. The maxi case is an equally bad offender to the end links IMO. 124060 is where I would look for a ceramic sub.

  • @netnoob77
    @netnoob77 2 роки тому +1

    Much prefer the Sea Dweller. Spot on pretty much everything. Submariner is nice too but not a fan of the thick lugs and boxy look of this iteration. Glad they fixed that with the latest version.

  • @FirestormAA
    @FirestormAA Рік тому

    H.Moser is the champ for me..... what a beauty!!!!

  • @ugaais
    @ugaais 2 роки тому +2

    Amazing episode Tim….

  • @Cinestudi0
    @Cinestudi0 2 роки тому +1

    I wonder how many people has use a sea dweller for deep diving, maybe 10?

  • @watchdogpodcast239
    @watchdogpodcast239 2 роки тому

    Is the lume pip slightly crooked to the right on the Sub?

  • @ugaais
    @ugaais 2 роки тому +1

    Also the A Lange 1815 wow…..

  • @awakim
    @awakim 2 роки тому +2

    Chopard wins this episode.

  • @impexRQ
    @impexRQ Рік тому +1

    The SD4K is the best Rolex sport model ever made… period

  • @gcfguvckhghhyv4547
    @gcfguvckhghhyv4547 2 роки тому +1

    Not the same movement in the two Rolex watches you compared.

  • @jenphil2008
    @jenphil2008 2 роки тому +1

    Wonderful vid very inspiring thanks for sharing

  • @styx4947
    @styx4947 2 роки тому

    And it is true that blank dials are a bold move, I think it also saves Moser a buck or two on dial furnature.lol

  • @Nefville
    @Nefville 2 роки тому +2

    I always hated that MB&F/ Moser UFO watch until today when I saw it in profile and you can see the hairspring spinning like a tornado inside a turbillon. Santa Maria that is awesome!

  • @jamesblonde2271
    @jamesblonde2271 2 роки тому

    I had an late 90's model Seadweller with the matt dial, it wore big but cost three grand pre owned and a bit baggy🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @stickshifter8
    @stickshifter8 2 роки тому

    It looks like Watchbox will acquire an interest on Greubel Forsey next…

  • @MrRoyck10
    @MrRoyck10 2 роки тому +1

    Rolex is a luxury fashion watch

  • @muffemod
    @muffemod 2 роки тому +1

    You forgot the cyclops

  • @SP-pn7xx
    @SP-pn7xx 2 роки тому

    The final Greubel Forsey has the face of Jabba the Hutt.

  • @19NJS71
    @19NJS71 2 роки тому +4

    Hey Tim, can't you do better than that crumpled piece of paper at the beginning? 🤣

    • @JoaoGomes-ce4th
      @JoaoGomes-ce4th 2 роки тому +2

      Tim & TWB keeping it real! No need for fancy effects here 😎

    • @GustapoGomez
      @GustapoGomez 2 роки тому +2

      elitist alert!

    • @davidr2802
      @davidr2802 2 роки тому

      all profits are rolled back into the business

  • @19NJS71
    @19NJS71 2 роки тому +2

    SD 4000 great watch.. but just traded it in for something else

    • @heeroy7
      @heeroy7 2 роки тому +1

      What did you trade for?

    • @TheRausing1
      @TheRausing1 2 роки тому +1

      The value of the 4000 will only keep going up, mark my words.

    • @Asiamoviemusicssscults
      @Asiamoviemusicssscults 2 роки тому

      @@TheRausing1 not much after I bought two years ago

    • @sirhodl5945
      @sirhodl5945 2 роки тому

      @@TheRausing1 agreed

    • @lettuce1305
      @lettuce1305 Рік тому

      @@Asiamoviemusicssscults you can't expect it to go up much in 2 years, but if say another 10-15 years and as long as rolex doesn't make another 40-41mm SD, then yes the SD4k price would keep going up and perhaps quite significantly

  • @gilbertgaldo
    @gilbertgaldo 2 роки тому +1

    Thumping sounds again. Please do something about it. I listen with headphones and I have to turn it way down so that it does not hurt my ears.

  • @roserstefan
    @roserstefan 2 роки тому

    Rowlecks vs Rowlecks

  • @JOHNNYSD-43
    @JOHNNYSD-43 Рік тому +1

    sea dweller any minute of the day

    • @impexRQ
      @impexRQ 6 місяців тому +1

      Absolutely

  • @DrRandomStranger
    @DrRandomStranger 2 роки тому

    2:22 that is false. The calibre 3135 is not antimagnetic.

  • @thatmexicanguy2989
    @thatmexicanguy2989 2 роки тому +1

    Uses a lemania based movement… patek: £50,000 please 😂 ridiculous

  • @cultclassic999
    @cultclassic999 2 роки тому

    01:32 N o sir, the investment potential is not self evident, m A $2.99 watch from Walmart can keep better time.

  • @racebannon2332
    @racebannon2332 3 місяці тому

    The Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 and prior iteration 16600 all day over the common submariner