@@fejuncor 2008 Australian Open, young Djokovic won in straight sets against Federer. And great us open 2010 and 2011 with poor bad losing Federer with match points 😎
@@laurentdu78 Federer contracted mono and was playing at sacrifice in 2008, he almost lost to Tipsarevic, the lost to Djokovic means nothing in this case talk about Djokovic's victory in cincinnati 2007, me and everyone will agree with you that he won because he won. Federer was playing well, and yet he was defeated that is a real victory now, matches where he clearly had a problem, show that u dont know how to contextualize or dont know about tennis Those who don't play tennis or don't participate in specialized groups can't identify this details, such as leg movement and flexion, etc but whoever is a tennis player can identify. I'm a tennis player. The match against Tipsarevic was only "disputed" emotionally, but not in terms of technical quality Federer was struggling to reach the balls, always reaching them very poorly and unbalanced to make the shots The Beijing Olympics is where you can see Federer's health condition more clearly in 2008. China has a chronic problem with air quality, due to geographical reasons, energy production is generally by burning coal, but this pollution does not dissipate, as in other countries, because of the Himalayan Mountains, the result is air pollution that is trapped, that's why people wear masks Federer in Beijing left matches drenched in sweat, and you saw the same movement problems, arriving unbalanced on the balls, and without power he was still competitive because he is a genius, compensated these disadvantage with talent. Even so, he lost to James Blake at the Olympics, the only defeat in his career for Blake, who was one of his hard pushovers several players who had never beaten Federer beat him in 2008 and his wr against the top50, which always hovered around 85-95% until 2008, plummeted to less than 30%. It is logical that such a large and abrupt change in performance, even due to the visible symptoms, was due to a factor and this factor was the mono
Roger clearly had ability and talent that many others had but he also possessed something else that does not have a name nobody has a label for it he was just that special
Most of the players would spit out a lung screaming, if they even made at least one of the shots Roger makes here in a real match. Roger casually moves along with at most a hint of a smile. Class act.
Switzerland has a reletively tiny population, so Roger became the most popular player among those who watch tennis because they love to see the game played with such skill and ingenuity, and not because he is from their country or region of the world...
Federer in God-Mode is a wonder to behold, sheer class and aesthetic beauty. He elevated the game of Tennis to a whole new level, everyone else had to fight to catch up.
It's like watching Messi or Brian Lara or Kane Williamson or Dan Carter - there is a grace to it, not overly aggressive and/or procedural (like Tendulkar and Ronaldo or Lomu)
Forget records..this man was pure genius, artist and blend of everything brilliant...I started watching tennis only because of him..he's idol and inspiration for millions of us..love from India to one and only Mr.Roger Federer..❤❤❤❤❤
Any other player would have pointed to their ears and garner more applause as if they made a once in a lifetime shot. But not Roger, it is just a normal walk in the park with his talent and skills.
To me Federer is the GOAT. Others might have won more tournaments or more singles titles or whatever, but no other player played that game with Rogers grace/style. For most other players the game seems to be really hard work, but Federer seems to enjoy it. GOAT!
Dr. RF studied and mastered tennis more than anyone never shying from the ultimate shots. These moments are such a joy and satisfying to watch, but behind the scenes he practiced incredibly more than most, constantly evolving and improving gradually to peak from his 6/7th professional year and consistently end up winning over even 5 great rivals he initially lost more to for years (Nadal, Agassi, Hewitt, Murray, Nalbandian) & dominated all others for 4.5 years at no. 1, a Big 3 record of 3 consecutive 90%+ won seasons at 95.3% max, setting the all-time record to win 14 slams in only 6 years, reaching 18/19 consecutive slam finals and once winning 24 finals consecutively! And even persevered in a few mid career years he only won 2/5 slams to have a glorious comeback adding a record 4th season 90%+ won, winning 3/4 his last slam finals! He bageled others a big 3 high x15 including many former/future No. 1’s, and v. all other Big 4 rivals but was only bageled by Nadal among them at FO, around the very beginning and end of his 25 year career and one odd time.. Nadal abd Djoker we’re each bageled over x10!
All sports lovers should love and respect Djoko Nadal and RF . Iam a RF fan. RF the most attractive and artistic player ever. It doesn't mean we can't like others.
In every game there is someone that make u feel the game is easy like football there is messi and there is others in tennis there is roger and there is others
Lmao you can't find anything that roger got.on novak and rafa so now you just talk about his beauty 🤣 or him not making sounds while playing. Dogshit loser.
@@zeusmanitou No, it isn't ho0w this world works. Ity's the way brainless trolls work, but most of the planet has adults who don't behave like kindergarten children.
People really miss the old days when there was net play. This is why Federer does what Lendl edberg and becker were doing daily, even just 2 times, they stand and scream.
Look, a later clip shows an exchange with Warinka - supposedly the best backhand in tennis. however, in the exchange it is RF who actually hits a backhand so hard you cannot see it. if RF was honest he would certainly not claim to be a " genius. " it is more that the majority of players are dull and ugly - kind of like the downhill of music. whatever it is, RF sets the standard and makes everyone else look dull, stupid and ugly by contrast . so, there you have it . we must excuse the other two of the big three - they have proved themselves champions - but also their games are pretty standard. i swear that when RF is on he held back from humiliating many players. 6-0, 6-0 is nothing for RF when he is on and playing the " bum-of-the-month . " i also guarantee his " dink " shots - after he had toyed with an " opponent " on an exchange - he put back into his pocket as he knew the humiliation it would inflict on the other player if he continued.
you know, tennis has a problem. it is such a bore. I actually enjoy more watch the old 20 yo Fed than the 2024's. They need to do whatever it takes to make it more interesting again; other it will lose fans. And you are looking at a watching that had watch for 50+ years when Mac, Connors and Borg was in vogue
@@yani-fl4dm Rafa has a 24-15 H2H winning record vs. Fed, including 8-6 on outdoor hardcourt. In Slam matches Rafa is 10-4 vs Fed, including 6-3 in Slam finals. In Slam finals Rafa's winning percentage is 73.3 % vs. 64.5 % for Fed. Now who's stupid😂
not to undermine his talent, but there are dozens of failures behind every successful shot of his, prolly that's why I think we didn't see him winning any slam. Whereas Fed had the highest % of successful winners beyond comparison with any other trickshot player.
All players, well nearly all, can go to God mode. When Kyrios goes to God mode there is virtually no player he can't beat. Rublev, Djokovic, Tsitsipas, Wawrinka, Nadal, Federer to name a few...The thing is, Kyrios never wanted to be number one and never put in much more than 15 mins of practice per day. He stayed up late drinking and playing X Box and still was able to achieve the wins he did against the top players. At 19 years old beating Nadal at Wimbledon showed what an amazing talent he was. He is a generational player that I feel was here to show other players what is possible. I never liked him to be honest as he drove me mad with his inconsistency. Of late though I've started to realise what a talent he was and all the greats agree.
@@lewishiley8126maybe he should consider putting in more effort on practicing? He didn’t win enough matches to be considered consistent nor great. Talented yes, disrupter yes, other than that, nah…
@@impopquiz Exactly what I was saying. He doesn't practice (15 mins per day) He is considered to be great as all the top players have indicated. You obviously haven't watched him demolish the world's number one twice in a row ? You don't play tennis I imagine and if you do it's social tennis and not competitively ?
@@strojzabelu Tennis is a lot more than just hard hitting baseline shots. You might think it is just down the line and cross court shot alone, rest everything is unorthodox. But it’s not. Being said that, Nick was technically gifted, he just had attitude problems.
@@saratchandradeevi you don't need to explain to me what tennis is. I've been playing it for more than 20 years. But I agree regarding Nick. I would also add his shot selection and general tennis IQ to his attitude problems. Hitting a 120 mph forehand or playing a hotdog winner means winning just one more point. It seems to me he sometimes thinks that because he has the ability/talent to play such shots, he should be rewarded more. That's why consistency is key to tennis success. And he just doesn't have it.
Like all pro sports, tennis is a mental game. Kyrgios has issues with his temperament: motivation, application and concentration. He's also a poor mover. Having a great serve and playing an attacking game with a few touch shots will only get you so far.
I don’t care about records. Watching Federer tennis game was just pure enjoyment. Just a beautiful technique with grace.
One of weakest mentality among top players . Always chokes against the top players on the biggest moments
@@hanlee5292he won 20 slams being lucky based on your logic 😂
You’re right! Records,shmecords..
& when he is ON ,he is unplayable
Federer is outpassed by Nadal and Djokovic forever
@@laurentdu78 your a moron. That’s not what the post is talking about. Obviously you didn’t learn anything in grammar school.
How exciting and so much joy watching R.Federer matches.
Times flies.
We're dearly missing him on court.
The best ever. Plain and simple.
Nadal owned Federer
@@bruins86 And Federer owned Nadal in the end and Joker owned Nadal his whole career so what's your point?
@@nelsonc6173nadal and novak owned federer.
@@ultrainstinct4922
Djokovic owned Federer lol 😂
A final 27-23 h2h with Federer leading the count for the first 40 matches
@@nelsonc6173 Nadal led the h2h against Djokovic for 45/60 matches
I've never enjoyed watching any player more than watching Roger.
Simply the greatest talent ever. His skills remain unmatched. And he did it with athletic grace no other player has ever possessed.
So talented even a teen Nadal owned him
@laurentdu78 Think you're missing something. At the end of their great rivalry, the Maestro owned Rafa. Roger was also older.
Poetry in motion👌👏
Talented is the right word. Federer was the most talented player ever, without question.
So talented Nadal destroyed him, and Djokovic also dominated him
@@laurentdu78 Nadal never destroyed Federer on fast courts and Djokovic was toyed by him until 2013
or gifted?
@@fejuncor 2008 Australian Open, young Djokovic won in straight sets against Federer. And great us open 2010 and 2011 with poor bad losing Federer with match points 😎
@@laurentdu78 Federer contracted mono and was playing at sacrifice in 2008, he almost lost to Tipsarevic, the lost to Djokovic means nothing in this case
talk about Djokovic's victory in cincinnati 2007, me and everyone will agree with you that he won because he won. Federer was playing well, and yet he was defeated
that is a real victory
now, matches where he clearly had a problem, show that u dont know how to contextualize or dont know about tennis
Those who don't play tennis or don't participate in specialized groups can't identify this details, such as leg movement and flexion, etc
but whoever is a tennis player can identify. I'm a tennis player. The match against Tipsarevic was only "disputed" emotionally, but not in terms of technical quality
Federer was struggling to reach the balls, always reaching them very poorly and unbalanced to make the shots
The Beijing Olympics is where you can see Federer's health condition more clearly in 2008. China has a chronic problem with air quality, due to geographical reasons, energy production is generally by burning coal, but this pollution does not dissipate, as in other countries, because of the Himalayan Mountains, the result is air pollution that is trapped, that's why people wear masks
Federer in Beijing left matches drenched in sweat, and you saw the same movement problems, arriving unbalanced on the balls, and without power
he was still competitive because he is a genius, compensated these disadvantage with talent. Even so, he lost to James Blake at the Olympics, the only defeat in his career for Blake, who was one of his hard pushovers
several players who had never beaten Federer beat him in 2008 and his wr against the top50, which always hovered around 85-95% until 2008, plummeted to less than 30%.
It is logical that such a large and abrupt change in performance, even due to the visible symptoms, was due to a factor
and this factor was the mono
Roger clearly had ability and talent that many others had but he also possessed something else that does not have a name nobody has a label for it he was just that special
The world and I miss the genius at play. It's such a shame we all grow old. Hail Roger Federer, the GOAT!
Most of the players would spit out a lung screaming, if they even made at least one of the shots Roger makes here in a real match.
Roger casually moves along with at most a hint of a smile. Class act.
Switzerland has a reletively tiny population, so Roger became the most popular player among those who watch tennis because they love to see the game played with such skill and ingenuity, and not because he is from their country or region of the world...
Federer in God-Mode is a wonder to behold, sheer class and aesthetic beauty. He elevated the game of Tennis to a whole new level, everyone else had to fight to catch up.
New level destroyed by Nadal 😅
Roger defeat Nadal in Wimbledon 2019, don't be that stupid..👍🏻@@laurentdu78
Miracles without showboating! :-)
An artist, unique.
trust me
a lot watching tennis bcoz of this man here..
It's like watching Messi or Brian Lara or Kane Williamson or Dan Carter - there is a grace to it, not overly aggressive and/or procedural (like Tendulkar and Ronaldo or Lomu)
The MJ of tennis
Forget records..this man was pure genius, artist and blend of everything brilliant...I started watching tennis only because of him..he's idol and inspiration for millions of us..love from India to one and only Mr.Roger Federer..❤❤❤❤❤
Any other player would have pointed to their ears and garner more applause as if they made a once in a lifetime shot. But not Roger, it is just a normal walk in the park with his talent and skills.
To me Federer is the GOAT.
Others might have won more tournaments or more singles titles or whatever, but no other player played that game with Rogers grace/style.
For most other players the game seems to be really hard work, but Federer seems to enjoy it.
GOAT!
I miss Roger
Dr. RF studied and mastered tennis more than anyone never shying from the ultimate shots. These moments are such a joy and satisfying to watch, but behind the scenes he practiced incredibly more than most, constantly evolving and improving gradually to peak from his 6/7th professional year and consistently end up winning over even 5 great rivals he initially lost more to for years (Nadal, Agassi, Hewitt, Murray, Nalbandian) & dominated all others for 4.5 years at no. 1, a Big 3 record of 3 consecutive 90%+ won seasons at 95.3% max, setting the all-time record to win 14 slams in only 6 years, reaching 18/19 consecutive slam finals and once winning 24 finals consecutively! And even persevered in a few mid career years he only won 2/5 slams to have a glorious comeback adding a record 4th season 90%+ won, winning 3/4 his last slam finals! He bageled others a big 3 high x15 including many former/future No. 1’s, and v. all other Big 4 rivals but was only bageled by Nadal among them at FO, around the very beginning and end of his 25 year career and one odd time.. Nadal abd Djoker we’re each bageled over x10!
Nadal and Djokovic passed federer definiitely. Roger last of Big 3
All sports lovers should love and respect Djoko Nadal and RF . Iam a RF fan.
RF the most attractive and artistic player ever. It doesn't mean we can't like others.
In every game there is someone that make u feel the game is easy like football there is messi and there is others in tennis there is roger and there is others
Djokovic and Nadal have won more majors but there will another Djokovic or Nadal. It's very unlikely there will be another Federer.
perhaps playing like Federer is outdated for being the best
I can’t bear to watch the baseline slugging games these days. Miss the artistry.
Donde aprendio Federer ? En la pared. Ojala me entiendan.
now we got stuck with these guys grunting like Sharapova and hitting the ball mindlessly as if it was a practice drill
Lmao you can't find anything that roger got.on novak and rafa so now you just talk about his beauty 🤣 or him not making sounds while playing. Dogshit loser.
Radwanska, Roger, Dustin Brown... would drive you crazy
Godly ✝️
Maestro did it for art, and not for only result only
The goat
I love how Novak fans click on Federer videos just to argue
Only player that looks good in slowmo.
who cares about how many GS ppl have, this man gave me so much joy watching him
everyone cares - thats how this world works
@@zeusmanitou No, it isn't ho0w this world works. Ity's the way brainless trolls work, but most of the planet has adults who don't behave like kindergarten children.
@@MikeAG333 Well you live in your World , but out there Is a Most Grandslam Reality 🙌
People really miss the old days when there was net play.
This is why Federer does what Lendl edberg and becker were doing daily, even just 2 times, they stand and scream.
fabulous
Tennis is so boring now. Just about speed and power.
RF ❤
Why does the ball sound so different at the French Open?
Well.. casual is always losing to practiced and trained...not only in his case.
No hay camino fácil con Nadal, no hay camino feo con Federer, no hay camino flojo con Djokovic
Look, a later clip shows an exchange with Warinka - supposedly the best backhand in tennis. however, in the exchange it is RF who actually hits a backhand so hard you cannot see it. if RF was honest he would certainly not claim to be a " genius. " it is more that the majority of players are dull and ugly - kind of like the downhill of music. whatever it is, RF sets the standard and makes everyone else look dull, stupid and ugly by contrast . so, there you have it . we must excuse the other two of the big three - they have proved themselves champions - but also their games are pretty standard. i swear that when RF is on he held back from humiliating many players. 6-0, 6-0 is nothing for RF when he is on and playing the " bum-of-the-month . " i also guarantee his " dink " shots - after he had toyed with an " opponent " on an exchange - he put back into his pocket as he knew the humiliation it would inflict on the other player if he continued.
you know, tennis has a problem. it is such a bore. I actually enjoy more watch the old 20 yo Fed than the 2024's. They need to do whatever it takes to make it more interesting again; other it will lose fans. And you are looking at a watching that had watch for 50+ years when Mac, Connors and Borg was in vogue
Rafa KOed Fed time and time again.
So Roger knocked out him including Wimbledon 2019. Rafa been 5 years younger than him. Don't be stupid 💀
@@yani-fl4dm Rafa has a 24-15 H2H winning record vs. Fed, including 8-6 on outdoor hardcourt.
In Slam matches Rafa is 10-4 vs Fed, including 6-3 in Slam finals.
In Slam finals Rafa's winning percentage is 73.3 % vs. 64.5 % for Fed.
Now who's stupid😂
now do this for djoko, oh u cant >
Of course, we get to watch the human rubberband show with the way Djoko stretches and lunges for the ball.
Federer cant bé a Greatest like Djokovic 😎🇷🇸
He did it a lot of times 😂😂 specially that great tweener in US Open..n so many others. Just check it here on YT genius..
Bollocks. Kyrgios was able to do that and even better on some shots
not to undermine his talent, but there are dozens of failures behind every successful shot of his, prolly that's why I think we didn't see him winning any slam. Whereas Fed had the highest % of successful winners beyond comparison with any other trickshot player.
All players, well nearly all, can go to God mode. When Kyrios goes to God mode there is virtually no player he can't beat. Rublev, Djokovic, Tsitsipas, Wawrinka, Nadal, Federer to name a few...The thing is, Kyrios never wanted to be number one and never put in much more than 15 mins of practice per day. He stayed up late drinking and playing X Box and still was able to achieve the wins he did against the top players. At 19 years old beating Nadal at Wimbledon showed what an amazing talent he was. He is a generational player that I feel was here to show other players what is possible. I never liked him to be honest as he drove me mad with his inconsistency. Of late though I've started to realise what a talent he was and all the greats agree.
@@lewishiley8126maybe he should consider putting in more effort on practicing? He didn’t win enough matches to be considered consistent nor great. Talented yes, disrupter yes, other than that, nah…
@@impopquiz Exactly what I was saying. He doesn't practice (15 mins per day) He is considered to be great as all the top players have indicated. You obviously haven't watched him demolish the world's number one twice in a row ? You don't play tennis I imagine and if you do it's social tennis and not competitively ?
Just seeing this makes me realise how great kygrios could have been
Dude, just because Nick has a talent for unorthodox shots doesn't mean he can win Grand Slams.
@@strojzabelu Tennis is a lot more than just hard hitting baseline shots. You might think it is just down the line and cross court shot alone, rest everything is unorthodox. But it’s not.
Being said that, Nick was technically gifted, he just had attitude problems.
@@saratchandradeevi you don't need to explain to me what tennis is. I've been playing it for more than 20 years. But I agree regarding Nick. I would also add his shot selection and general tennis IQ to his attitude problems. Hitting a 120 mph forehand or playing a hotdog winner means winning just one more point. It seems to me he sometimes thinks that because he has the ability/talent to play such shots, he should be rewarded more. That's why consistency is key to tennis success. And he just doesn't have it.
Like all pro sports, tennis is a mental game. Kyrgios has issues with his temperament: motivation, application and concentration. He's also a poor mover. Having a great serve and playing an attacking game with a few touch shots will only get you so far.
Too weak 3 best player in the world when play with Novak looks like a chill,nole toying with him.