*Part 2 is here:* ua-cam.com/video/JVy1lTICXBQ/v-deo.html&ab_channel=RazOls *Part 3 is here:* ua-cam.com/video/c4ZRULrULTY/v-deo.html&ab_channel=RazOls
I'll probably get a lot of hate for this comment but for me Roger will always be the greatest ever. Never seen a player make the game look so easy and effortless, never seen a player make nor even attempt some of the shots he can. Sure record and statistics will say Novak is the GOAT which now he undoubtedly is but for me personally, no one will supplant Federer.
Tbf, Roger and Rafa, who were already both Titans in the mid 2000’s cancelled out each other before Novak peaked. If weak era argument is true, then the current one is the weakest of all, and its exactly the reason why Novak is bagging slams and masters.
Without doubt, Federer is the most talented, beautiful, vesatile, well behaved player ever to play tennis. Variety of shots he plays, is far more than combined of Nadal or Novak. His service, volley , stop volley, backend, forehand and dropshots are very pleasing to watch. To play for 20 over yrs with very high consistency is simply amazing. And above all, he is very humble, down to earth always easy going with his fans and media. We hardly read or hear people say bad things abt him. It is astonoshing to know that he has never retired half way in 1250 plus matches he has played. This shows how much he loves Tennis.. No other player has this effect on public past 50 yrs plus. No wonder he gets so much love, respect and attention from Reporters, players and public. He also got Fans favourite player award for mind blowing -19 times- Even if Novak or Nadal wins 25 Slams, they can never match talent, skill, charishma, elegance and popularity of Federer. Novak may go down as Goat but Federer is Lion (the king who rules).>>>>
Yes ,agree ...i think...if the game is just about wining there is just one player above to Roger Federer and any player you want to compare : Rod Laver only player who won the four GS in one year twice
There will never again be anyone on a tennis court who has the talent, lightness, genius, plasticity, and almost artistic touch of Roger Federer. Swiss Maestro! 🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭
I agree with you about the incomparable and inimitable quality of Roger Federer's tennis. It is a combination of great original talent, hard work, a mentality that respects the sport, and even a physique, a body that is proportionally very suitable for this sport.
Based on touch, feel, power, athleticism, Alcaraz is the most talented player ever by a huge margin. Whether he can convert this into greatness over his career is another question though
@@mikemoggerson6651 Dude, no. Better than Novax for sure but RF won 17 GS with a racquet that's close to a wooden one and he could still generate laser shots with it. And with a one handed backhand...
@@pierre-marc.gareau close to a wooden racquet? My goodness you’re an amateur. If you think Fed’s racquet in the mid 2000s was remotely similar to a wooden racquet you may be the biggest Fed shill of all time. No one would be able to even win a match in the past 20 years with anything close to a wooden racquet.
There can be a full 3 hr movie on his brilliance! The thing that I can't wrap my head around is that in every single match he produced some magic shot. Something that only he can do. For me the most unique athlete!
The most naturally gifted GREAT tennis player. There’s plenty of hyper talented players out there with unlimited shot making skills. What separated Roger from them was his consistency, fundamentals and other basics that allowed him to use his talent to his full potential. At the end of the day it’s ultimately about winning and Federer was one of the greatest winners of all time, but that’s due mostly to things other than magical shot making skills
A good observation about Roger Federer! His gifts and his match fitness allowed him to display the great capacity he had to play brilliant tennis without extraordinary means. He skimmed along the courts the way an eagle skims along the sky, and he hit the balls with the same precision that eagles display when swooping for their prey. Just exhilarating.
Finally! I’ve always thought of him to be a raptor-like apex predator. A broad wingspan with no extra muscle, and the way he opens his upper body whether it is serving or volleying, is very powerful. His combination of instinct and athleticism meant when he came to the net, he often won the point. Always a top 5 server, he had a good jump up and forward, and the ball came off his racket with a brisk snap generated by his torso. (And his back gave him problems at one point). Whether jumping or moving forward to take the ball earlier, Fed was about early action and interception. Yet he looked so absolutely relaxed while making the most ridiculously good shots.
Having the most slams is not being the greatest but having the longest career. Look at Federer's game and points - incomparable creativity and touch. On the other hand, Djokovic and Nadal --- hitting and smashing the ball till the end of time. Imagine you were a WR holder in the 100m sprint discipline but two guys held more wins, who's the GOAT?
As a pretty good tennis player. Played some ITF tournaments in my early 30's. Been playing the sport for almost 40 years now. I can tell you with 100% conviction in my ❤ that no one will beat Roger Federer if he is on a 10/10 level. Not Novak Not Nadal no one. The way Roger adapted with the game. The way he changed his game to beat Nadal I think it was 5 or 6 times in a row. Federer in beast Mode was unbeatable.
I dont care how many million billion dropshots Alcaraz pulls: none of them have been close to the disguise, surprise, dead stop, side spin, soft touch, brilliance of any of these seen here. And only Federer does the disguised punch-through masquerading as a drop shot. I think Ive seen Alcaraz attempt it just once. It worked so not sure why he hasnt done it more often.
Novak will be remembered for his success, Roger for his talent, beauty and personality on and off the court. Always when I talk about tennis with people who never watch tennis literally, people always come up with the name FEDERER. Anything else to be mentioned on the goat debate?
There’s many people with skill sets like Roger. There’s countless players on tour with magical shot making skills, flair, and elegant technique. The only thing that separates Fed from them was how good Federer was overall as a tennis player. To make it sound like his elegance and shot making skill was unmatched is just not true. His elegance and shot making skill was amazing but was combined with consistent winning. It’s really the winning and domination that people care about first, then they look back at how a player made them feel. But only for the greats. Nobody cares if Monfils hits 30 spectacular winners in a match if he loses in straight sets.
Keep up the videos Raz!!! Love them always did! You're my OG Fed documentarian! Been with you since your first post and you are my go to for everything FED! Thank you!
Nobody remembers the tennis courts were slowed down. On a fast court, Prime Roger was unbeatable. Even your Goat was thrashed by Roger on Faster courts when he had not declined. Dubai 2014, Shanghai 2010 or 2011, Cincinnati 2015 and World tour finals 2010 where Roger beat both Rafa and Novak
Nobody has or will ever play tennis like this again -Federer played shots others could only dream about and didn’t need to talk to his coach after every single point ? Games never been the same since he retired unfortunately.
Stop insuating with alcaraz in every vidéo of fédérée what is you problème In every videos you mentionated this young guy withoot name him directly What has hé done to you kill your mother or someting 😅😅
Cómo te echo de menos ❤, ahora el circuito huérfano de talento, nos venden que los deportistas son tenistas y no es así, el tenis es Roger, sin marca blanca como el resto.
Djokovic just grabbing GS while 2 main rivals are out. What a joke, we're now calling "goat" a player with an average talent. Come on, only people who play a good level of tennis know that Roger is the greatest.
Federer won 4 grand slams after 2010. 3 of those came in the time frame Djokovic was injured and out of the top 10 from 2017-2018. Federer was 2-10 against Novak in grand slams after Novak turned 22. Novak has better stats and everyone in pro tennis, including Sampras, McEnroe, Wilander, Nadal, etc knows he is the goat. Literally EVERYONE to the point where it’s not even worth mentioning it anymore. Let me just cite a few examples “I do think what Novak's done over the past 10 years, winning the majors, being consistent, finishing No. 1 for seven years, to me it's a clear sign that he is the greatest of all time”-Pete Sampras in 2021 “Novak has that ability, which is part of the reason why he's the greatest ever.”-John McEnroe “It’s an impossibility to make a statistical argument against him being the best ever. It’s like proving gravity at this point. He’s now tied Margaret Court on 24 Slams but he wants all of the records, so he’ll want to get to 25.”-Andy Roddick “To me, [with] 24 [Grand Slam singles titles], it’s pretty evident that he’s best player of all time. He’s got the record and he’s probably got the best win-loss record against all the players against each other as well, and against the other top players.”-Pat Rafter “He has ended the debate over who is the greatest male player of all time.”-Tim Henman “Djokovic is the GOAT because the numbers tell it all. 24 SLAMS 96 singles titles. But he is on Mt. Rushmore because when you play the Serbian Sniper he made you RUSH MORE!”-Rick Macci I could go on for countless pages but Djokovic is the unanimous goat of tennis. Please, tell me anyone who’s of relevance in the last year saying Federer is the greatest of all time. I could search and find at least 100 people saying Djokovic, and would find nothing for Federer. Keep coping over those “style points” though
@@mikemoggerson6651The past is set on stone and we can't change it. If we could tinker with time and placed them both at the same age, their career trajectory would be very different. Djokovic career timing has been to his advantage. Being 6 yrs younger allowed him to build himself up until Federer's level declined enough that when he himself reached his physical peak of around 24 years old he could then rise. Their careers may overlap by many years but Djokovic had a longer run way in his prime years that Federer had to deal with.
@@kweizi5712 Djokovic is mentally tougher and a smarter player than Federer. That’s why he was able to achieve more. Has nothing to do with age. The older player should actually be more experienced in clutch situations, which was the opposite for Federer against Djokovic and Nadal. He was mentally imploding to Nadal even in the mid 2000s. Matches lost with match points: Djokovic-4 Federer-24
@@mikemoggerson6651There are so many factors at play that it's not that straightforward. 1. Courts have been slowed down significantly, which plays to the advantage of baseliners like Djokovic and Nadal, especially on service return (one of Djokovic's primary strengths). 2. Djokovic has won 16 out of his 24 grand slams since 2015. Both Federer and Nadal had injuries in 2016, and Murray had his hip injury in 2017. Wawrinka and Del Potro had their injuries in 2017-2018. All these players being out one way or the other have made it much easier for Djokovic. There is no way he could maintain this level if he was constantly having to do 5 setters every grand slam for the last 5 years. 3. In terms of pure skill and talent, there is no question about the fact that Federer is better than Djokovic. The 2019 Wimbledon final is the best example of it, all the stats indicate that Federer should have won. Federer's mental strength being what it is, was the only reason that Djokovic won. All this to say that using stats to determine who the GOAT is is pointless. Watching Federer's game is by far more pleasing than it is to watch anyone else's (Wawrinka when he's in form is a treat to watch as well) There is no other player who is anywhere close to being as complete as Federer is, graceful as Federer is and as creative as Federer is, all with minimal effort.
0:56, lol yeah right Paul Annacone (commentator), bring everything he got to the table? Not even close to his best. Most matches Federer won quite simple, only the serve of Raonic made it somewhat competitive scoreboard-wise. There were only some matches where Federer had some issues with Raonic. Raonic's prime was around 2015-2016 and still barely beat Federer. A good example is Wimbledon 2017, that was a full display of "everything Federer got" and Raonic got vaporized. They are not in the same league at all but at the time of this Brisbane match, Raonic was still considered a threat to the tour.
I heard John McEnroe say that he believed that Federer was going to be remembered for his skill as one of the greatest on the court. Federer is pretty modest about it all. McEnroe has one of the best records in the history of men's world professional tennis.
If Roger were 6 years younger than Novak, he would ve won more Slams than Novak because Novak is motivated by a target set by Federer and then Rafa. Federer s target was 14 by Sampras and he beat that by 6 Slams
Many of these highlight videos overlook the fact that RF could rarely turn on the magic when it mattered most with ND and RN. That is the saddest thing for his fans. So many opportunities that he couldn't take. The one kink in his armor was that he'd get tight in the most important moments against the toughest opponents. To make matters worse for him, almost all courts were getting bouncier and slightly slower.
Robbie Koenig being naughty. "Haven't seen Mirka in a while. Guest appearance here in Paris. enjoying touch from her husband" as RF hits a delectable drop shot 😅
While Federer to me is not the GOAT but he still is undoubtedly one of tennis HOF simply because he was able to win Grand Slam at the age of 37 and 38. Djokovic is still the more consistent and reliable player in my opinion. Hence, statically speaking, he is the GOAT of tennis.
Honestly it’s sad to see players like Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Del Potro, Nalbandian and even Murray are considered players of the weak era while someone has won slams against Kyrgios lol. Not to mention the inconsistency of these players even Alcaraz. Roger was so good that he made these other players look like weak. I mean see his records. 5 consecutive Us Opens. 1 final against Novak. 5 consecutive Wimbledons. His 2005 was 91-5 lol But this is the strong era with players like Rune, Zverev, De Minaur and Kyrgios
Well alcaraz inconsistency ?? He is not only 20 yold Federer at his age was also inconsistency You cannot compare Roger a legend who his carreer is over with kids who just started playing
How many grand slam your not going to win is not a problem for me how hearts you win is the main factor of the life i think he will be the no 1 on the concept all replacement player ever played thanks Roger for your tennis 😮😮😮
Roger is my favorite player to watch and I love him, but it’s sad most of his great plays come at not so important points… Like 30/40:0 or even between points. And for me it doesnt matter what you do at 40:0, it matters what you do at 5:5 in the tiebreak. Thats why to me Novak is the goat, because he is the most clutch, but Roger will always be someone I will watch highlights of from all these years. And don’t get me wrong, to be 2nd or 3rd greatest of all time is not that bad of an achievement! Cheers
I believe Federer had the best tiebreak record in the open era until around the early 2010s. His tiebreak performance during his prime years was extraordinary. Even in 2013-2015, he won a lot of important tiebreaks including against Novak. Anyway Novak is definitely the most clutch in pressure moments but Federer was no slouch either. For me Federer remains the GOAT.
@@thegreatercornholio8393 Of course, given there played so many amazing champions, like McEnroe, Agassi, Sampras, Connors, my understanding is that to be 2nd/3rd best in history is incredible. I hate when people try to make laugh of Roger calling him the 2nd… I wish all these people to be 2nd in the history of anything they do in life, especially something as worldwide as tennis. : )
@@spiritlance364 Yeah, I think Roger’s mental toughness was ”only” very good, Novak’s is out of this world. I know quite a lot about tennis, I’ve heard stories or players who were champions materials, but didnt even win 1 ATP point, cause they could only do well in practice… So I realize that to achieve what Roger did, it’s simply impossible to be mentally weak per se.
Why are you jacking other people's ideas and series? There's someone on youtube - Burns Tennis - who has a seeies of " Sampras Casual Brilliance" and you straight jacked his shit. This isn't anything original, you're just taking from someone else. Come up with your own.
You should be careful how you phrase things you know nothing about. I didn't get the idea from that channel, which I've never heard about. I just checked, the videos from that channel has 7 000 and 6 000 views. You're kidding right, automatically assuming I watched them? If you want to know - you could have asked - I got the inspiration from a fellow UA-cam friend of mine called WivoRN Productions who had a series of Federer among the lines of "Federer Casually Handling Big Servers". The part about 10 minutes and brilliance I thought out myself. Is that explanation enough or should I be investigated more? I've had videos and content directly stolen from my channel countless times and I know how frustrating it is, so no, I don't go around and try to steal or copy exact things from others, no matter how certain you are that I'm one of 7 000 viewers (lol).
First of all I will phrase however I see fit, I am speaking truth. What are you going to do, have my comment removed, fine, run from truth. Secondly there are many videos that say "Casual" - a common word in the english language - search "Sampras cool, casual..." where he's compared to DiMaggio. Then you added the word "brilliance" The "Casual Brilliance" is something he put together, and I know where the phrase "Casual Brilliance", cause he told me feom whom and I also know where. And it's also ironic, and by that I mean suspect that you're Federer Casual Brilliance vida only came up after his Sampras Casual Brilliance. And I didn't say stole his video, but from everything that is apparent it sure looks likenyou jacked his title, idea and theme.
@@johnblaze8808 What I'm going to do? Well, I just responded earlier and wrote the reason why I made this video. It has nothing to do with the Sampras videos (which I hadn't even watched) but I understand that no matter what I say, you've already made up your mind. So what do you really want to discuss? Pour your hate out on my because you "just know" you are right? I have no intention of wasting my time on rude persons like you and I have no trouble keeping these messages online for everyone to see. I have nothing to be ashamed about when it comes to this video. Again, I've had videos, titles and content stolen time and time again and it's not something I'm wanting to do against someone else because I know the feeling. But of course, you "speak the truth" and know what went through my mind when I decided to make this video. Here's the video I got inspired by: ua-cam.com/video/SwPlnk_a0dc/v-deo.html&ab_channel=WivoRNProductions And yeah, if you don't want to come across as a Mr Know-It-All and a complete jerk by accusing people of things and when you are not one bit interested of what the other person has to say, then yes, go ahead and phrase your opening message like that. This is my last message responding to your accusations.
What do I want you to do? I could careless, but let's look at the facts. You said you got "casual" from that video and "brilliance" yourself, and decided to put them together... really? It's not a common phrase, and actually it's a specific phrase from someone and that's where that poster got it from. He admitted so and paid homage unlike yourself. That video is over a year old and yours is a month, and a Fed fan like yourself only saw that video a month ago... please. "We don't believe you, you need more people" -Jay-Z "Takeover" And as far has "hate pouring" I'm not the one commenting on the # of veiws of other vids. And by the way if you think the # veiws you get is attributable to you... it's not. You're not doing anything special. Fed videos will gain a lot of views due to the size of his fan base, which includes fanboys like yourself, not because of you. I can put a vid of naked woman on youtube and get a lot of veiws, and guess what? They wouldn't be watching for me. If you were doing anything special, you would be able to be more original.
Игру Федерера отличает, недоступная почти никому, ЕСТЕСТВЕННОСТЬ!!! Полностью отсутствуют вычурность, надуманность движений, отсутствие ,,индивидуальных особенностей,, при выполнении ВСЕХ технических приёмов... Такое возможно только при условии, что выполнение ударов было связано с выполнением повседневных движений в обычной жизни... Аналогии в жизни есть для каждого удара в теннисе... Бросок камня вверх над собой - подача... Метание палки или другого предмета сбоку от себя - готовый удар справа... Удар наотмашь тыльной стороной ладони - удар слева... Ловля предмета перед собой - удар слёта... Резаный слева и рубленый справа - удары саблей-хворостиной по высокой траве... В житейских условиях мы делаем движения правильно и не задумываясь - по универсальной для всех схеме - разумной достаточности... И только в теннисе мы видим громадное количество ,,индивидуальных предпочтений,, от приемлемых до уродливо-комических... Ни в одном другом виде спорта, где снаряд посылают при помощи предмета, удерживаемого руками - нет такого великого многообразия техник выполнения ударов!!! Это и хорошо и плохо одновременно. Хотя современный ультрабыстрый теннис нивелирует технику и приводит к определённому универсализму базовых движений большинства профессиональных игроков... Но теннис от скуки обезличивания индивидуальностей всегда спасает и будет спасать МАНЕРА игры каждого в отдельности... И узнавать в теннисе игрока мы всегда сможем с любого расстояния даже без номера на майке!!!
@@dewman7477 all useless records. Djokovic has most slams, most AO, most masters, most ATP Finals, most year end number 1, weeks at number one. Only record fraudrer has in Wimbledon which will soon fall to novak.
@@aranyaism we’ll see what happens about that at Wimbledon record also tied with Sampras and Connors at us open record too and a bonus of most consecutive weeks at number 1 Also this video isn’t about Djokovic which makes Federer living in your head rent free. If you don’t like Federer then just go away and watch Djokovic all day this video isn’t about goat like you think everything is about
*Part 2 is here:* ua-cam.com/video/JVy1lTICXBQ/v-deo.html&ab_channel=RazOls
*Part 3 is here:* ua-cam.com/video/c4ZRULrULTY/v-deo.html&ab_channel=RazOls
I'll probably get a lot of hate for this comment but for me Roger will always be the greatest ever. Never seen a player make the game look so easy and effortless, never seen a player make nor even attempt some of the shots he can. Sure record and statistics will say Novak is the GOAT which now he undoubtedly is but for me personally, no one will supplant Federer.
Federer is a class all his own! No one like him, plays like him, is as classy as him! Those shots are his! I miss seeing him play!
Your comment is so innovative and original, I love it
100% agree. Novak is the most successful, Roger is the most talented.
"I'll probably get a lot of hate for this comment" --- not from Fedal fans; only the other lot 🤔
Tbf, Roger and Rafa, who were already both Titans in the mid 2000’s cancelled out each other before Novak peaked. If weak era argument is true, then the current one is the weakest of all, and its exactly the reason why Novak is bagging slams and masters.
Without doubt, Federer is the most talented, beautiful, vesatile, well behaved player ever to play tennis. Variety of shots he plays, is far more than combined of Nadal or Novak. His service, volley , stop volley, backend, forehand and dropshots are very pleasing to watch. To play for 20 over yrs with very high consistency is simply amazing. And above all, he is very humble, down to earth always easy going with his fans and media. We hardly read or hear people say bad things abt him. It is astonoshing to know that he has never retired half way in 1250 plus matches he has played. This shows how much he loves Tennis.. No other player has this effect on public past 50 yrs plus. No wonder he gets so much love, respect and attention from Reporters, players and public. He also got Fans favourite player award for mind blowing -19 times- Even if Novak or Nadal wins 25 Slams, they can never match talent, skill, charishma, elegance and popularity of Federer. Novak may go down as Goat but Federer is Lion (the king who rules).>>>>
I so agree! It's not the number of slams or trophies. You can win class and elegance!
Yes ,agree ...i think...if the game is just about wining there is just one player above to Roger Federer and any player you want to compare : Rod Laver only player who won the four GS in one year twice
When you try to learn to play tennis, you understand who is the goat, is Roger.
There will never again be anyone on a tennis court who has the talent, lightness, genius, plasticity, and almost artistic touch of Roger Federer.
Swiss Maestro! 🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭
I agree with you about the incomparable and inimitable quality of Roger Federer's tennis. It is a combination of great original talent, hard work, a mentality that respects the sport, and even a physique, a body that is proportionally very suitable for this sport.
Roger will always be the GOAT for me, even if all his records get broken. One of a kind.
Based on touch, feel, power, athleticism, Alcaraz is the most talented player ever by a huge margin. Whether he can convert this into greatness over his career is another question though
@@mikemoggerson6651🙄
@@mikemoggerson6651 Dude, no. Better than Novax for sure but RF won 17 GS with a racquet that's close to a wooden one and he could still generate laser shots with it. And with a one handed backhand...
@@mikemoggerson6651You are Alcaraz on a pedestal when he still has a long way to go before he should be mentioned in the same breath as the big 3.
@@pierre-marc.gareau close to a wooden racquet? My goodness you’re an amateur. If you think Fed’s racquet in the mid 2000s was remotely similar to a wooden racquet you may be the biggest Fed shill of all time. No one would be able to even win a match in the past 20 years with anything close to a wooden racquet.
Most talented player ever
Drop shots 😍
Half volleys 😍
Fakes 😍
Slice passing shots 😍
In the words of Robbie Koenig, "MAGICIANAL!"
I love Robbie!
I've always worried about that word. Now I know how to spell it!
His touch is unreal
There can be a full 3 hr movie on his brilliance! The thing that I can't wrap my head around is that in every single match he produced some magic shot. Something that only he can do. For me the most unique athlete!
The most naturally gifted Tennis Player so far.
The most naturally gifted GREAT tennis player. There’s plenty of hyper talented players out there with unlimited shot making skills. What separated Roger from them was his consistency, fundamentals and other basics that allowed him to use his talent to his full potential. At the end of the day it’s ultimately about winning and Federer was one of the greatest winners of all time, but that’s due mostly to things other than magical shot making skills
Roger's elegance is unique🦄
A good observation about Roger Federer! His gifts and his match fitness allowed him to display the great capacity he had to play brilliant tennis without extraordinary means. He skimmed along the courts the way an eagle skims along the sky, and he hit the balls with the same precision that eagles display when swooping for their prey. Just exhilarating.
Finally! I’ve always thought of him to be a raptor-like apex predator. A broad wingspan with no extra muscle, and the way he opens his upper body whether it is serving or volleying, is very powerful. His combination of instinct and athleticism meant when he came to the net, he often won the point. Always a top 5 server, he had a good jump up and forward, and the ball came off his racket with a brisk snap generated by his torso. (And his back gave him problems at one point). Whether jumping or moving forward to take the ball earlier, Fed was about early action and interception. Yet he looked so absolutely relaxed while making the most ridiculously good shots.
The smoothest and most elegant tennis player of all times.
That would be Miloslav Mecir. But Federer is super smooth and elegant too, of course.
Having the most slams is not being the greatest but having the longest career. Look at Federer's game and points - incomparable creativity and touch. On the other hand, Djokovic and Nadal --- hitting and smashing the ball till the end of time. Imagine you were a WR holder in the 100m sprint discipline but two guys held more wins, who's the GOAT?
He is the best I’ve seen. At his best he was the best.
As a pretty good tennis player. Played some ITF tournaments in my early 30's. Been playing the sport for almost 40 years now. I can tell you with 100% conviction in my ❤ that no one will beat Roger Federer if he is on a 10/10 level. Not Novak Not Nadal no one. The way Roger adapted with the game. The way he changed his game to beat Nadal I think it was 5 or 6 times in a row. Federer in beast Mode was unbeatable.
Really appreciate your sound editing on these videos mate
Sir Roger federer golden legend in universal love you so much miss you so much teniss history best player ❤❤❤
Nice selection!
That's poetry 😍
I dont care how many million billion dropshots Alcaraz pulls: none of them have been close to the disguise, surprise, dead stop, side spin, soft touch, brilliance of any of these seen here.
And only Federer does the disguised punch-through masquerading as a drop shot. I think Ive seen Alcaraz attempt it just once. It worked so not sure why he hasnt done it more often.
Yes alcaraz can also do the disguised punch trough drop shot he do it sometimes and maybe he can improve it 😅
Very stunning level of tennis...and what a soft hand 😵
Novak will be remembered for his success, Roger for his talent, beauty and personality on and off the court.
Always when I talk about tennis with people who never watch tennis literally, people always come up with the name FEDERER. Anything else to be mentioned on the goat debate?
No one like Roger, never will be again
There’s many people with skill sets like Roger. There’s countless players on tour with magical shot making skills, flair, and elegant technique. The only thing that separates Fed from them was how good Federer was overall as a tennis player.
To make it sound like his elegance and shot making skill was unmatched is just not true. His elegance and shot making skill was amazing but was combined with consistent winning. It’s really the winning and domination that people care about first, then they look back at how a player made them feel. But only for the greats. Nobody cares if Monfils hits 30 spectacular winners in a match if he loses in straight sets.
@@mikemoggerson6651 of the major winners, Federer is the most talented
Keep up the videos Raz!!! Love them always did! You're my OG Fed documentarian! Been with you since your first post and you are my go to for everything FED! Thank you!
Thx man this means a lot 🙏 Appreciate the support over the years
Raz your videos are now more needed than ever !! it's a desert out there....
Tennis is dead in July 2021 😢
Thanks for this great video. 👍
Nobody remembers the tennis courts were slowed down. On a fast court, Prime Roger was unbeatable. Even your Goat was thrashed by Roger on Faster courts when he had not declined. Dubai 2014, Shanghai 2010 or 2011, Cincinnati 2015 and World tour finals 2010 where Roger beat both Rafa and Novak
Nobody has or will ever play tennis like this again -Federer played shots others could only dream about and didn’t need to talk to his coach after every single point ? Games never been the same since he retired unfortunately.
Alcaraz has hit many shots this year Fed could never dream of.
@@mikemoggerson6651 if you hate Fed, un-sub
Stop insuating with alcaraz in every vidéo of fédérée what is you problème
In every videos you mentionated this young guy withoot name him directly
What has hé done to you kill your mother or someting 😅😅
talento total
The Best 👏👍💪
The GOAT debate is decided only by the opinions of the FANS. At the moment, Federer is ahead of the other 2 greats.
legend
The GOAT 🐐
Cómo te echo de menos ❤, ahora el circuito huérfano de talento, nos venden que los deportistas son tenistas y no es así, el tenis es Roger, sin marca blanca como el resto.
if you're talking tennis you're talking RF
The last dropshot after the LET call ... meowgnificient! :)
I'll proudly tell my kids that I witnessed the magic of Messi and Federer.
El más grande! ❤
Roger was the first the rest followed suit..❤
Genius at work
Inarrivabile!
We needed more late game Federer. Not just 2.5 good years
Beautiful.
Djokovic just grabbing GS while 2 main rivals are out. What a joke, we're now calling "goat" a player with an average talent. Come on, only people who play a good level of tennis know that Roger is the greatest.
Federer won 4 grand slams after 2010. 3 of those came in the time frame Djokovic was injured and out of the top 10 from 2017-2018. Federer was 2-10 against Novak in grand slams after Novak turned 22.
Novak has better stats and everyone in pro tennis, including Sampras, McEnroe, Wilander, Nadal, etc knows he is the goat. Literally EVERYONE to the point where it’s not even worth mentioning it anymore. Let me just cite a few examples
“I do think what Novak's done over the past 10 years, winning the majors, being consistent, finishing No. 1 for seven years, to me it's a clear sign that he is the greatest of all time”-Pete Sampras in 2021
“Novak has that ability, which is part of the reason why he's the greatest ever.”-John McEnroe
“It’s an impossibility to make a statistical argument against him being the best ever. It’s like proving gravity at this point. He’s now tied Margaret Court on 24 Slams but he wants all of the records, so he’ll want to get to 25.”-Andy Roddick
“To me, [with] 24 [Grand Slam singles titles], it’s pretty evident that he’s best player of all time. He’s got the record and he’s probably got the best win-loss record against all the players against each other as well, and against the other top players.”-Pat Rafter
“He has ended the debate over who is the greatest male player of all time.”-Tim Henman
“Djokovic is the GOAT because the numbers tell it all. 24 SLAMS 96 singles titles. But he is on Mt. Rushmore because when you play the Serbian Sniper he made you RUSH MORE!”-Rick Macci
I could go on for countless pages but Djokovic is the unanimous goat of tennis. Please, tell me anyone who’s of relevance in the last year saying Federer is the greatest of all time. I could search and find at least 100 people saying Djokovic, and would find nothing for Federer. Keep coping over those “style points” though
❤ No rating, nö balans, Roger Best All time Tennisist, Maestro King! #1Tennisist ATP Tennis! ✌️
@@mikemoggerson6651The past is set on stone and we can't change it. If we could tinker with time and placed them both at the same age, their career trajectory would be very different. Djokovic career timing has been to his advantage.
Being 6 yrs younger allowed him to build himself up until Federer's level declined enough that when he himself reached his physical peak of around 24 years old he could then rise. Their careers may overlap by many years but Djokovic had a longer run way in his prime years that Federer had to deal with.
@@kweizi5712 Djokovic is mentally tougher and a smarter player than Federer. That’s why he was able to achieve more. Has nothing to do with age. The older player should actually be more experienced in clutch situations, which was the opposite for Federer against Djokovic and Nadal. He was mentally imploding to Nadal even in the mid 2000s.
Matches lost with match points:
Djokovic-4
Federer-24
@@mikemoggerson6651There are so many factors at play that it's not that straightforward.
1. Courts have been slowed down significantly, which plays to the advantage of baseliners like Djokovic and Nadal, especially on service return (one of Djokovic's primary strengths).
2. Djokovic has won 16 out of his 24 grand slams since 2015. Both Federer and Nadal had injuries in 2016, and Murray had his hip injury in 2017. Wawrinka and Del Potro had their injuries in 2017-2018. All these players being out one way or the other have made it much easier for Djokovic. There is no way he could maintain this level if he was constantly having to do 5 setters every grand slam for the last 5 years.
3. In terms of pure skill and talent, there is no question about the fact that Federer is better than Djokovic. The 2019 Wimbledon final is the best example of it, all the stats indicate that Federer should have won. Federer's mental strength being what it is, was the only reason that Djokovic won.
All this to say that using stats to determine who the GOAT is is pointless.
Watching Federer's game is by far more pleasing than it is to watch anyone else's (Wawrinka when he's in form is a treat to watch as well)
There is no other player who is anywhere close to being as complete as Federer is, graceful as Federer is and as creative as Federer is, all with minimal effort.
maybe Novak Djokovic is Goat, but Roger Federer is the God of Tennis.
0:56, lol yeah right Paul Annacone (commentator), bring everything he got to the table? Not even close to his best. Most matches Federer won quite simple, only the serve of Raonic made it somewhat competitive scoreboard-wise. There were only some matches where Federer had some issues with Raonic. Raonic's prime was around 2015-2016 and still barely beat Federer. A good example is Wimbledon 2017, that was a full display of "everything Federer got" and Raonic got vaporized. They are not in the same league at all but at the time of this Brisbane match, Raonic was still considered a threat to the tour.
I heard John McEnroe say that he believed that Federer was going to be remembered for his skill as one of the greatest on the court. Federer is pretty modest about it all.
McEnroe has one of the best records in the history of men's world professional tennis.
Так скучаю по его игре, всегда ждал его матчей. Самый красивый, атакующий и острый тенисс это именно федерер
Idk why people defends to the guts Djoko is the best. He might have won more, but Rog is a genius.
If Roger were 6 years younger than Novak, he would ve won more Slams than Novak because Novak is motivated by a target set by Federer and then Rafa. Federer s target was 14 by Sampras and he beat that by 6 Slams
Federer just played the game on a different level to everyone else.
Roger Federer is always Best Player and very Calm on the Court
Anyone else heard that in a sports commentary before? “Enjoying touch from her husband” 😂😂😂
What? Just 10 minutes?!
The "Elvis Presley" of Tennis!
Отл! 💪
It's funny how my UA-cam suggestions never comes up with any compilations of Novak being casually brilliant, even though statistically he's the GOAT.
Many of these highlight videos overlook the fact that RF could rarely turn on the magic when it mattered most with ND and RN. That is the saddest thing for his fans. So many opportunities that he couldn't take. The one kink in his armor was that he'd get tight in the most important moments against the toughest opponents. To make matters worse for him, almost all courts were getting bouncier and slightly slower.
Robbie Koenig being naughty. "Haven't seen Mirka in a while. Guest appearance here in Paris. enjoying touch from her husband" as RF hits a delectable drop shot 😅
AND thereafter he just walks as if nothing happened ! There Must be mixed emotions for the opponent - fury as well as awe 😅
Pause at 6:44: Hell of an advert there.
I realize after Federer switches to that black racquet, he has been back as if it's his prime time.
GOAT things!!
Watch out for Jannik Sinner next year, he did beat Nole twice lately last month ☝🏽
🐐🐐♥️♥️
Federer is the GOAT. Novak destroyed tennis
While Federer to me is not the GOAT but he still is undoubtedly one of tennis HOF simply because he was able to win Grand Slam at the age of 37 and 38. Djokovic is still the more consistent and reliable player in my opinion. Hence, statically speaking, he is the GOAT of tennis.
😂 Me encanto como boludeo a los bolls boys
Mr 3 here he is the third best in the world et il parle français alors peut être qu'il devrait être le GOAT numéro 1
Like a cheetah playing with its prey 😊
I miss the days when tennis wasn't all about who could bash the ball the hardest.
Did federer make a come back in the match he was down 5-1 in the last set
Honestly it’s sad to see players like Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Del Potro, Nalbandian and even Murray are considered players of the weak era while someone has won slams against Kyrgios lol. Not to mention the inconsistency of these players even Alcaraz. Roger was so good that he made these other players look like weak. I mean see his records.
5 consecutive Us Opens. 1 final against Novak.
5 consecutive Wimbledons.
His 2005 was 91-5 lol
But this is the strong era with players like Rune, Zverev, De Minaur and Kyrgios
Well alcaraz inconsistency ?? He is not only 20 yold
Federer at his age was also inconsistency
You cannot compare Roger a legend who his carreer is over with kids who just started playing
How come there’s not a video vs Rafa? Hahaha
IW 2017 or Shanghai 2017. Add in WTF 2011, 2007 and a lot more tbh.
@@spiritlance364 I mean in this video!
@@MarcyTrinidadMaybe he wanted to put more points that people haven't seen as much or ever
How many grand slam your not going to win is not a problem for me how hearts you win is the main factor of the life i think he will be the no 1 on the concept all replacement player ever played thanks Roger for your tennis 😮😮😮
Roger is my favorite player to watch and I love him, but it’s sad most of his great plays come at not so important points… Like 30/40:0 or even between points. And for me it doesnt matter what you do at 40:0, it matters what you do at 5:5 in the tiebreak. Thats why to me Novak is the goat, because he is the most clutch, but Roger will always be someone I will watch highlights of from all these years. And don’t get me wrong, to be 2nd or 3rd greatest of all time is not that bad of an achievement! Cheers
That last sentence of yours might be one of the greatest understatements I've ever come across. What Federer achieved was nothing but extraordinary.
I believe Federer had the best tiebreak record in the open era until around the early 2010s. His tiebreak performance during his prime years was extraordinary. Even in 2013-2015, he won a lot of important tiebreaks including against Novak. Anyway Novak is definitely the most clutch in pressure moments but Federer was no slouch either. For me Federer remains the GOAT.
@@thegreatercornholio8393 Of course, given there played so many amazing champions, like McEnroe, Agassi, Sampras, Connors, my understanding is that to be 2nd/3rd best in history is incredible. I hate when people try to make laugh of Roger calling him the 2nd… I wish all these people to be 2nd in the history of anything they do in life, especially something as worldwide as tennis. : )
@@spiritlance364 Yeah, I think Roger’s mental toughness was ”only” very good, Novak’s is out of this world. I know quite a lot about tennis, I’ve heard stories or players who were champions materials, but didnt even win 1 ATP point, cause they could only do well in practice… So I realize that to achieve what Roger did, it’s simply impossible to be mentally weak per se.
Men's tennis has definitely lost its shine since Roger left the scene.
Just because he can
Bro loves messing with soderling with the fake dropski deep sliceypoo
week era 2002-2008, Alkaraz is better then rodik, safin, naibladian, soderling, filipisijus
Most points here are between 2010-2020 mate.
@@SHVideografie I know, but I hawe to say, 2002-2008 is week era, safin, naibladian, soderling, rodik, Nadal and Novak are greatest
@@Leonikolic554hmmm Roddick 5-4 Novak, Safin 2-0 Novak, Gonzalez 2-1 Novak..... Sound ridiculous 😂, what weak era hmmm?
@@viveknamikaze761 Novak hawe 19- 20 yours, he is young then,
@@viveknamikaze761 safin, filipisijus, Gonzales, O GS, alkaraz 2 GS, 20 Yours
The novak geeks will have to accept federer IS tennis
Ever seen a man play tennis with a paintbrush?
Raz Ols love you so much ❤❤❤
First
Why are you jacking other people's ideas and series? There's someone on youtube - Burns Tennis - who has a seeies of " Sampras Casual Brilliance" and you straight jacked his shit.
This isn't anything original, you're just taking from someone else. Come up with your own.
You should be careful how you phrase things you know nothing about. I didn't get the idea from that channel, which I've never heard about. I just checked, the videos from that channel has 7 000 and 6 000 views. You're kidding right, automatically assuming I watched them?
If you want to know - you could have asked - I got the inspiration from a fellow UA-cam friend of mine called WivoRN Productions who had a series of Federer among the lines of "Federer Casually Handling Big Servers". The part about 10 minutes and brilliance I thought out myself. Is that explanation enough or should I be investigated more?
I've had videos and content directly stolen from my channel countless times and I know how frustrating it is, so no, I don't go around and try to steal or copy exact things from others, no matter how certain you are that I'm one of 7 000 viewers (lol).
First of all I will phrase however I see fit, I am speaking truth. What are you going to do, have my comment removed, fine, run from truth.
Secondly there are many videos that say "Casual" - a common word in the english language - search "Sampras cool, casual..." where he's compared to DiMaggio. Then you added the word "brilliance"
The "Casual Brilliance" is something he put together, and I know where the phrase "Casual Brilliance", cause he told me feom whom and I also know where.
And it's also ironic, and by that I mean suspect that you're Federer Casual Brilliance vida only came up after his Sampras Casual Brilliance.
And I didn't say stole his video, but from everything that is apparent it sure looks likenyou jacked his title, idea and theme.
@@johnblaze8808 What I'm going to do? Well, I just responded earlier and wrote the reason why I made this video. It has nothing to do with the Sampras videos (which I hadn't even watched) but I understand that no matter what I say, you've already made up your mind. So what do you really want to discuss? Pour your hate out on my because you "just know" you are right?
I have no intention of wasting my time on rude persons like you and I have no trouble keeping these messages online for everyone to see. I have nothing to be ashamed about when it comes to this video. Again, I've had videos, titles and content stolen time and time again and it's not something I'm wanting to do against someone else because I know the feeling. But of course, you "speak the truth" and know what went through my mind when I decided to make this video.
Here's the video I got inspired by: ua-cam.com/video/SwPlnk_a0dc/v-deo.html&ab_channel=WivoRNProductions
And yeah, if you don't want to come across as a Mr Know-It-All and a complete jerk by accusing people of things and when you are not one bit interested of what the other person has to say, then yes, go ahead and phrase your opening message like that. This is my last message responding to your accusations.
What do I want you to do? I could careless, but let's look at the facts. You said you got "casual" from that video and "brilliance" yourself, and decided to put them together... really?
It's not a common phrase, and actually it's a specific phrase from someone and that's where that poster got it from. He admitted so and paid homage unlike yourself.
That video is over a year old and yours is a month, and a Fed fan like yourself only saw that video a month ago... please.
"We don't believe you, you need more people"
-Jay-Z "Takeover"
And as far has "hate pouring" I'm not the one commenting on the # of veiws of other vids. And by the way if you think the # veiws you get is attributable to you... it's not. You're not doing anything special. Fed videos will gain a lot of views due to the size of his fan base, which includes fanboys like yourself, not because of you. I can put a vid of naked woman on youtube and get a lot of veiws, and guess what? They wouldn't be watching for me.
If you were doing anything special, you would be able to be more original.
Игру Федерера отличает, недоступная почти никому, ЕСТЕСТВЕННОСТЬ!!! Полностью отсутствуют вычурность, надуманность движений, отсутствие ,,индивидуальных особенностей,, при выполнении ВСЕХ технических приёмов... Такое возможно только при условии, что выполнение ударов было связано с выполнением повседневных движений в обычной жизни... Аналогии в жизни есть для каждого удара в теннисе... Бросок камня вверх над собой - подача... Метание палки или другого предмета сбоку от себя - готовый удар справа... Удар наотмашь тыльной стороной ладони - удар слева... Ловля предмета перед собой - удар слёта... Резаный слева и рубленый справа - удары саблей-хворостиной по высокой траве... В житейских условиях мы делаем движения правильно и не задумываясь - по универсальной для всех схеме - разумной достаточности... И только в теннисе мы видим громадное количество ,,индивидуальных предпочтений,, от приемлемых до уродливо-комических... Ни в одном другом виде спорта, где снаряд посылают при помощи предмета, удерживаемого руками - нет такого великого многообразия техник выполнения ударов!!! Это и хорошо и плохо одновременно. Хотя современный ультрабыстрый теннис нивелирует технику и приводит к определённому универсализму базовых движений большинства профессиональных игроков... Но теннис от скуки обезличивания индивидуальностей всегда спасает и будет спасать МАНЕРА игры каждого в отдельности... И узнавать в теннисе игрока мы всегда сможем с любого расстояния даже без номера на майке!!!
men with zero records :)
You clearly don’t know tennis if you think Federer still doesn’t have any records in tennis
@@dewman7477 all useless records. Djokovic has most slams, most AO, most masters, most ATP Finals, most year end number 1, weeks at number one. Only record fraudrer has in Wimbledon which will soon fall to novak.
@@aranyaism we’ll see what happens about that at Wimbledon record also tied with Sampras and Connors at us open record too and a bonus of most consecutive weeks at number 1
Also this video isn’t about Djokovic which makes Federer living in your head rent free. If you don’t like Federer then just go away and watch Djokovic all day this video isn’t about goat like you think everything is about
First
Nope
You were second by like 30 seconds ish
@@Bowl849Lol