China Built Huge Number of Type 072A Landing Ships - What On Earth For?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- The Type 072A and its predecessor is a large family of landing ship tanks, or LST, which deploy armoured vehicles and marines to support an amphibious landing. China has built 36 of the Type 072 series of LST.
/ eurasianavalinsight
www.buymeacoff...
Tags: Chinese Navy, PLA Navy, PLAN, naval, defence, military, amphibious warfare, Type 072, Type 072II, Type 072III, Yuting II class, Yuting class, Yukan class
#chinesenavy
#pla
Dont worry, N€D-poodles, those are fishing boats.
what for usa created landing ships
It will be interesting to see what % of the PLA army soldiers switch over to the expanding marine corp
They have no choice but to do what they are told to do.
@@kellyjohnson9394Oh you mean like every military arm subordinate to the government?
@kellyjohnson9394 hey ya idiot! When you are in the army you do what you are told.
10% already
@@accountantthe3394 He DOPE. Our military is a VOLUNTEER MILITARY. The “paper dragon” military are FORCED LABOR OR DEATH. DOPE.
Possibly to free
Okinawa 🤗
Correction, It's the state of Ryukyu, not Japanese colonized Okinawa.😊
If necessary, China can urgently produce more than 100 landing ships of this tonnage within a few months.
People seem to forget that China has several islands off her coast, not just one called Taiwan.
Yup, including those they occupied from someone else's EEZ.
Taiwan doesn't belong to red China 😂
@@paulsteavenEEZ disputes are common, not just involving China. Besides I find it odd that no one is questioning why a few small Western European countries are occupying continents, islands etc on the other side of the globe, far far away from western Europe and oh what happened to the indigenous people of Australia and the Americas? If China has no claim on S China Sea, don’t know why Western Europeans have any claim on landmasses nowhere near Western Europe. And we need to throughly investigate the genocide of indigenous people of the continents of Australia and Americas.
@@sombrerogalaxy1 of course, it's expected that you will bring up the atrocities made by those Western Countries to justify what China is doing right now.
Not surprised with this kind of reply tbh.
@@paulsteaven then why do you bring up china’s eez dispute? So only you get freedom of speech and not me? The collective West using hallow “freedom democracy” slogans to white wash its unforgivable sins is frankly disgusting.
Whilst the latest version is by far the most capable, the earlier versions are still useful landing vessels, and the PLA Navy may well have plans to upgrade these within the constraints of the hull in due course. It might seem that combining such vessels with the many Chinese fast attack missile boats would make for a highly effective combination, since both classes of vessel are ideal for use in shallower waters.
Amphibious vessels have a lot more uses than just military action. Essentially these are overengineered ferry.
nothing changed that much. it is still TOFU.
Well done China PLA.💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯❤❤
*China JUST completed (in the past week) several NEW shipyards for even larger PLAN ships*
Can you do a video of what you think they may be for?
@@leapdrive little boy, go back to kindergarten.
@@leapdrive lol keep bitchin loser
@@leapdriveYou sound sceeerd. Yeah, u sceerd! LOL!
@@leapdriveI got news for you buddy, if China really wanted to, China can sink the ENTIRE US NAVY in about one hour. All ships, all assets, all docks and shipyards gone. I know you don't believe its possible and that's probably good.
@@leapdriveNobody is invading Taiwan, that's just yankee propaganda. China and Taiwan want to integrate, but China wants to retain control and Taiwan wants China to be more like Taiwan and Hong Kong. The idea that Chinese of either location would WANT a disastrously destructive war is pure lunacy. Only Americans are ignorant enough of the outside world to think that anyone would want to blow themselves up. What the Chinese want is to curtail your empire.
Chinese ship building capacity can build hundreds of the 072A LST within one year and PLA Navy rather let many ship builders belly-up in the previous decade and not to rescue them. Well, the question is difficult to answer?
Taiwan and what are you gonna do?
The Ukrainian Maritime Drones are low cost and effective. If Taiwan has a thousand drones, the PLAN invasion fleet won't make it to the beach.
Thanks for always keeping us updated on our china brother's progress
Love from Africa
FYI this channel is made by a Taiwanese. I doubt he sees China as a brother even though you might.
@@DaGoook Yeah, it'd be kinda weird if someone from, say, Alabama would view the US as a brother...
@@DaGoook the current govertment does not mean the people there, they are all ethnic chinese,
@@xinyiquan666 Not all people in Chinese are ethnic Han, and not all Han people are from China.
But if what you mean is not all Chinese people support the CCP, then yes I agree.
@@DaGoook He is clearly saying that many African sees the Chinese as part of a brotherhood of formerly oppressed and colonized peoples and nations of the global south. Nothing to do with the author of the video.
I see type 72s used to deliver a concentrated force along a single front. Tip of the spear so to speak. But the bulk of landing force will ride on work horse LSMs like Type 271s and Type 74. Type 72s to be honest are an overkill for Taiwan and more suited to south china sea or other longer range operations in Asia. The LSM have range of 1000nm and has room for 3 tanks, 5 IFV or 7 to 8 trucks. Most importantly they are extremely numerous, about 500 type 271s are built from 1980s to 1990s, with ~300 of estimates to be still in operation. (They are often ignore by west analyst since they are in Army's orbat rather than the Navy's and often operated by reserves rather than active troops.) This alone would deliver 2 to 3 brigades by itself in a single wave. However, i would image Type 74As to be target vessel for an future invasion, with existing numbers only used for training, and production will ramps up to hundred s during periods of tension, similar to how type 271 numbers ramped up in the 1990s. The existing 271s wil like to be in reserve or used for supplies missions in case port facilities are not usable. Since Type 271 is about 6 knots slower than type 74A, has higher crew count and has much poor ride quality, which would increase casualty rate during thr crossing, sucking up man power than be used elsewhere and reduce combat effectiveness of landed troops.
usa,this is for you
i know a few years ago china had made a place that is on the shore line had a tunnle going into a mountain they were saying that it was deep enough there they could pull subs into the opening on the mountain i would not be surprizedif china has a fleet of landing subs so they could hit coasts with being seen till it was happening
China doesn't rule out the invasion of Taiwan for reunification. Although it prefers much peaceful means like 1 county 2 system it calls. Independent Taiwan but part of China.
China's maritime & naval industry is improving the by day, surpassing the so called Western standards by miles . . . there's lot we could learn from China . . . a country with such capabilities doesn't need nukes to keep the super powers at bay & continue sustaining the balance (way of life) of world as it is . . . dictatorship has it's perks though . . . for e.g. a brilliant human resource management in every Chinese industry, that's not susceptible to the challenges of democracy . . . China's growing naval prowess & it's capabilities is the perfect example . . .
According to Wikipedia, your figures for the capability of the Type 72 LST are very far off.
Each ship does not have a capacity of 500 troops plus armored vehicles,
Apparently each ship has a capacity of 250 plus 10 vehicles.
Big difference.
And, since it has a max speed of 20 knots (14 mph), it'll take a very, very long time to traverse the Taiwan Strait... Maybe half a day under ideal conditions if lucky? I'd say these aren't particularly fearsome vessels, all that can be said for them is that they can transport some soldiers, but not many and without any higher end vehicles. Their vehicles would have to be transported by other means because 10 relatively light vehicles isn't likely going to be enough.
Y ?......So millions of young Chinese men will die for Mr.XY Xi.....that's Y!
Why do you think? nobody questions the excessess of US military spending on war material!
So ...they need many such ships. Why not? My question is, there's far too few of it.
Perhaps the needs to protect these ships are even more important than having more of them. Although these ships are not expensive to build, the cargoes they carried are far more valuable to the PLA and its operations. These ships only have token defensive capabilities and rely on escorting warships for protection. So building more of these LSTs means building more escorts.
@@tvgerbil1984 hence the many many frigates (type...um....052???)
To be honest, Taiwan is not as fortified as everyone thinks. The most heavily fortified island is Kinmen. If you go to Taiwan, which I recommend for its good food and great atmosphere, make sure to visit Kaohsiung beach. This is the most likely landing spot for the PRC; it's hardly defended at all. There are barely any hedgehogs, bunkers, or checkpoints. The PRC could literally land under the cover of a new moon at any of the beaches and unload enough forces to secure every port and piece of infrastructure in the south. Moreover, the strong ties many senior leaders in the Taiwanese army have to the mainland, including family and assets, are concerning. Coupled with the CRS report indicating that over 70% of retiring Senior Leaders either move to the mainland or become activists against Taiwan, there's a strong indication that there are senior leaders still in service who may not be fully loyal. In such a scenario, the initial invasion could be swift and silent.
Once daylight breaks, the PRC would likely target every stationary howitzer position-many of which haven't moved since the 1960s-and given China's proximity, just 100km from Taiwan, a barrage of rockets could hit all the hangars, presidential and government centers, and barracks within the first few hours. My prediction is that once the government is decapitated and major military command destroyed, the remaining senior leaders, probably on the CCP payroll anyway, would assume governance and surrender. The last Ash Center and NCCU polling of Taiwanese on the questions of: Would you fight to the death for Taiwan and\or if they are willing to join the military to defend Taiwan. 69% answered yes to the first and less than 22% the latter.
By the time the US reacts, the conflict would likely be nearly over. Sad, but thats the reality and the PRC only grows stronger every year.
15 is not a huge number, the title is very clickbaity and the real number is hidden near the end of the video.
In world war 2 the germans built a lot of coastal defense and us and allies used battle ships and bombers to softn targetzts
China instead of brute force where people rush in without protections/shield like in US invasion of Normandy,
China should design protected "box" where soliders are safe that the tank load up to the cliff then move back and load more box of soliders and repeat. Those box should be heavy reinforced to protect it from higher caliber guns.
It's cheap to make and protect human.
They dont need to. Majority of Taiwan's defense batteries are stationary and known. If China does invade the first thing China will do is use the PLARF to destroy majority of the island's defense capabilities, airfields, radar and the 12 warships that Taiwan has. The only thing standing between Taiwan and the landing party is Taiwan's ground forces assuming they dont surrender the beach.
That's ur genius idea??what if the enemy just fire a rpg or artillery shell at box?
@@jont2576 when I said "box", it is implied that is reinforced, armored, and can angled to deflect incoming.
Has anybody seen China map.....for this week?
Should be a nice turkey shoot for Taiwan 😂😂😂😂😂
Compro 800.000 unidades para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro Brasil
Back in the day I was assigned to (combat cargo) tasked with loading and unloading the equipment we had on to the Lcacs my biggest question in my head I never asked is how are we supposed to get ashore on a contested beach. I grew up on the images of DDay or Iwo jima... well iwo they were allowed ashore in the first waves
The days of Normandy type battles are pretty much over.
Nowadays the beachhead will not be too contested. No army or navy will attempt to land troops like that. Any adversarial forces along the Beach would be suppressed before large scale amphibious landings take place.
@@katprowler6805 Sadam Hussain was preparing to defend the beach against a Marine landing force that never went in and russia was preparing to land in Oddessa in the opening days of the war. That civilians were filling sand bags on the beach.
The very nature of a landing ship tank it for a contested beach. And China clearly thinks they will be of use.
What do you mean by not to contested?
You can not find every concealed position.
What if hit a mine on the way in?
Is it possible the enemy has artillery in range of the beach?
Is the enemy going to kindly keep there head down?
WHAT IF the enemy has a Air force that does allow you to get air superiority?
I agree maybe not a grand scale like Dday.
No hate just Questions to ask and having trained for it no I do not think these days are behind us.
@@wardaddyindustries4348 Because the process would be in reverse:
1) Establish air superiority
2) Conduct maritime blockade
3) Clear straits
4) Conduct landing
Did you actually think the PLA is going to swim across under fire?
The difference is back in wwii, there’s hardly any precision/guided weapons. The sensory technologies (IR, laser, various bands of radar, etc) for detecting hidden enemy weapons did not exist. Total and endured air superiority was not easy to maintain. Airborne assault troops, which render some of the beach head defences useless, did not exist. The capabilities of paratroopers were no match to modern day ones. There was no hovercraft (eg LCAC) type landing platform which widens dramatically the types of coasts you can land on. The list goes on and on … which make the modern day coastal defence strategy a lot more different than it used to be.
@@wardaddyindustries4348 exactly.. you basically confirmed my statement. No attacking forces today would land on a fully fortified beach like in Normandy.
They would've used an alternate route or to totally nullify the beach fortifications first with PGMs, cruise missiles, bunker busters etc. Befire any amphibious troops land.
For landing on the rouge province
Compro 5.000 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro
Compro 20 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro
Most of the 072s except 072A are close to retirement. In projecting troops from shore to shore, 072 has more advantages than 071. It is generally believed that a combined brigade-level amphibious delivery requires 20-25 072As. Therefore, some analysts believe that when China suddenly produces 072 on a large scale and the total number increases to 50+, it will be the beginning of an attack on Taiwan.
An enforcement of Sovereignty over the island of Taiwan, the territorial integrity of China.
most chinese shipyards can punch out this type of ship in no time.... this ship ain't top secret stuff
S!R REQUEST AB0UT CH!NA Bo Sea Pearl class
roll-on/roll-off ship, Type 726 LCAC, Ankang-class
ambulance
craft AND Chinese
medical
evacuation
ship Zhuanghe!!!
THANK'S!!!
It is noteworthy that Russia managed to conduct operations in Syria with it's legacy 1970s Cold War landing ships over much greater distances.
Taiwan would never become the threat potential that would require amphibious landings - a simple blockade would do in order to break a seceding leadership - while crucial US arms shipment like anti-ship and cruise missiles are to be intercepted as during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
An arguably more relevant factor may be shaping the diplomatic climate, similar to Syria that enjoyed reinforcements from Iran.
For now, the Philippines are again in US control - but that may change, complicating any US or Japanese operations if the PLA were given temporary station or additional airlift options.
To become the main character of the incoming sitcom: The Amazing Invasion of Taiwan :V
You can not invade your own territory.
Ask the UN why the Chinese Island of Taiwan is Chinese territory.
How does one invade oneself?
You should worry about the British-Raj
我們是內戰 不是入侵😂
They need a close air defense system against coordinated swarms of 40 small kamikaze drones. 5kg warhead aiming for a vulnerable spot could wreck something.
Hey man i really love your channel and the info you provide, but would it be possible to run your voice over thru an AI smoothing software. Its just rather rough on my ears and echos somewhat.
Hey any reliable news about fujian aircraft carrier ? Saw many videos saying that all emals are completed..
every super power has them
looks like another Suggestion for Modern Warships game
I think they are thinking about landing on Florida coast in the near future. 😂😂
Duh, Beach landing
They want to build an underwater breakwater off the coast of Taiwan
All I see is a collection of future reefs in the Taiwan straits and abundant fish food
For the south China sea skirmish with the American.
Compro mais uma vez a fragata toda por 900 trilhões manda para a base do rio de janeiro Niterói brasil marinha
Compro a fragata toda por 900 trilhões manda para a base do rio de janeiro Niterói brasil marinha
I firmly believe that China will be able to unify Taiwan like the Qin state in the past, I believe that our brother will be able to do it. And on the other hand, we are also quite short of landing ships, with love from Vietnam 😋
Simping for the country that steals your territory and waged uncounted wars against you without justification?
its not taiwan that PLAN is facing, its more likely USN and IJN. i dont believe such thing as peaceful reunification, especially when taiwan's education system been off the track for so many years. unfortunately its very likely to spark ww3 with usn in its way
You should better not hope for a successful chinese invasion of Taiwan, since your country would be the next in line. China waged war on Vietnam, did you forget that?
@@abraham2172nope muslim Malaysia and Indonesia are bigger threat to us than China. We just don't want to see Jihad or Islam culture on our land
YESS, MEE T00 BEL!EVE IT!!!
This is basically the smaller version of the type 071
PLAN will surely conduct amphibious operations therefore Taiwan should acquire huge numbers of affordable midget submarines. In this manner, ROCN can probably sink numerous PLAN military transport ships and other ships.
Why bother with midget subs. The Ukrainian Maritime Drones are low cost and effective. If Taiwan has a thousand drones, the PLAN invasion fleet won't make it to the beach.
Thay can and only can sink their own fish ship
@@HuyLe-qc8jcNoone can compete drone with pla
@@HuyLe-qc8jcrather funny talk about using drone attack to a country where they are leading in Drone technology and largest manufacturer of the world.
Landing does not even require a military landing ship, civilian ships can be used, because the People's Liberation Army will ensure that there will be no units in the Taiwan Strait and coast that can counterattack before landing.
They have huge LST Subs with legs to crawl up the beach as well!
Really?Prove it!
😆
I've seen them sold in Alibaba, but Mexico is making them now.
lmao, no they dont. The Strait is 20-100m deep. an LST submarine is impractical since 70% of the strait is less than 50m deep.
Tbh we all know Chiba won’t do it they rely on it
A 'situatuion' involving taiwan
Don't underestimate Powers and Principalities. The Princes are at work.
Yes.. What on earth for??
It’s obvious why they built them.
Yes, for the same reason all nations have them.
invade taiwan.
Engrish
😂 we all know what they’re for. Stand with Taiwan! End the ccp!
To help Taiwanese people visit mainland China with their cars? :)
Obviously China is gonna use these ships to export all their Uighurs to the freedom loving province of Taiwan. All 13 million of them. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂😂Glory-to-the-British-Raj 😂😂
Why would they invade their own territory? Taiwan.
There are only 14 countries recognize taiwan....
Belize, Guatemala, Haiti, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, Paraguay, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, São Tomé and Príncipe, and Vatican City
While the rest 150+ countries around the world recognize taiwan as part of mainland China.
@@ahmadahmal2942nobody recognizes Taiwan as part of china 😂😂
Great video as usual, excellent English by the way. Any idea on the total amount of amphibious ships in the PLAN?
At least 8 Type 071s【25,000 tons】 and 3 Type 075s【40,000 tons】
32 Type 072【4,800 tons】
About 480,000 tons
My English is not very good, can you understand me?
Oh BOY!!!
A LST-design like that of WW2.....with the bow doors Directly/Nearly on the surface. That is why, if you look at the USN LAST LST-types (not the landing craft themselves), We DON'T have our bow doors near the surface!!!
I F ... You blow out those doors, water rushes into the cargo of HEAVY Tanks and you'll sink the vessel, with Everything/body onboard!!!
So, I believe that once the PLAN has a 'beach secured' MayBe they'll send in these vessels to land tanks near the shore!!
True, USA did not have bow ports, you had a ramp, that ramp made the ship incapable of dropping amphibious units in the sea, they could only deploy them in the sea from the stern.
On the other hand, if you blow a hole in Newport class LST they go down just as fast as if you blow a hole in Type 072
some things will not change since it was invented, like mug has a handle, and door has a nob, its actually the only right way to make it
@@LuobingSong Really.... REALLY!!???
No... as a USN Veteran of 20+ years, who Used to, protect these ships, I can tell you that the USN does NOT have these ships of this style. AND, as mentioned above this is WW2 design.
I Guess.... you would have cavalry charges with horses, or have Lines-o-fire straight across with soldiers in Plain View, OR have MANY sailors with oars as somebody says, " .... BATTLE... S P E E D !!!!"
Mugs with handles.......Yeah, for my Farkin coffee.... as I plan to Attack your fleet!!
@@Hey_MikeZeroEcho22P how do you reckon the new USN LST program or something what ever they call them, i think as you have served in USN for more than 20 years, you must have a great view on that
LST is LST, thats all, the only place to see a LST is where no enermy ship exists at all. and for a landing mission, you must clear all enermy ship at first.
Soviet Union and Russia built so called WW2 style LST till now. and soviet army ready to perform a major landing mission from Romania coast to Italy and Greek if WW3 begins
i totally understand why USN do not build LST after WWII US ARMY have base everywhere in the world, US army can invade Iraq from Saudi Arabic. no landing mission. but image one scene, what if another major landing mission from UK to France just like WWII, your mission is transport 3 million tones of equipments and more than 1000k GI cross the strait in 3 weeks
LCAC can be fast, but each carries 1 tank or 50 GI at one time, helicopters can not carry tanks, cargoes needs a port for unloading.
for most Chinese, we lately realized US army do not perform any of major military operation since gulf war, US built a whole bunch of fancy things like DDG 1000, US army fight againist Afghanistan with their expensive missiles and laser bomb and performace of US army in Afghanistan are even worse then soviet army in Afghanistsn. are those things US army told us or they believe is true?
what if Taiwan war again? what if WW3 again? will these fancy things designed for send a little group of marine troops overseas actually work if your enermy have 3 tank division, 300k infantry, and 600 new jet fighters? for China, theres more than 3 Taiwan War in old ages.
question: DO AMERICAN KNOW HOW TO WIN THE TAIWAN WAR THAN CHINESE? i think japs know much more than American about asia and about Taiwan, as they lose the Taiwan war 500 years ago. so as russian, they know more about europe, and they build so called outdated LST till now.
American has some kind of mysterious selfconfidence that what they are doing is right for no reason. for euro-asian peoples, we have learn some valueable lessions that nothing comes with no reason, if France are going through Revolution that means things has come for europe to have a revolution. if russians are at civil war that means russian need the civil war. and for Taiwan War, maybe it may happen more times as time changes. everytime China shift its govener, original govener will escape to Taiwan, and when it is the time, Taiwan war happens, and new govener rule out the old one and bring the civil war to an end.
US do not actually have that kind of experience since begin, but as times goes by, American may also experience things like this every few decades, and you will understand why China are building LST and prepare a Taiwan war, why moscow are fighting againist kiev, why riot in paris, why turks are fighting with russian in ukrine, and why japs are invading china and supporting Taiwan goverment
@@Hey_MikeZeroEcho22P as i said, things will not change since it begins till its end. DD and CV became mainbattle ship since WWII, things do not change till now. DD become DDG, CV become CVN, but major role of dd and cv do not change. no one build BB and crusiers now. even the type 055 DDG is still named as DDG not crusier, that is not because it is smaller than a crusier but it play the role of DDG.
now i do not see any kind of new landing vehicle can play the role of LST. the main and only use of LST is transport large number of tanks and army forces--not marines, in the range of less than 500 km, from one coast to another, affordable and easy. the original design of LST in WWII is a mid size ship, can striaght land on a coast, has a gate at front and can pull it self back into sea and at last affordable price can be built in large numbers. i do not see any kind of new things can actually play the row of this.
BB can be abandond because CV carries plane can destroy enermy ship better, crusier can be abandond because new DD can also cruse the sea and do most of crusier job better and cheaper.so why no LST.
well imagine one scene, russians rearmed havana with 1000 new tanks and 500 new jet fighters, and before Russians try to deploy some of their nukes on the island, US army have to invade Cuba first. US Navy should transport at least 3 divisions in 3 weeks before Russian navy with 11 CVN and 100 DDG come oversea. what should you do?
*072-II pronounced "seventy two eye-eye" or "seventy two double-eye"*
"II" here stand for Roman numero "2". So it's "Zero Seventie-two, Two" or "Zero Seventie-two, Second variant"
Can it cross oceans looking at it's size.
It is almost certainly designed to operate primarily within the first island chain
of course it can, its thosuands ton ships, it can ship to south pole if it wants to, also FYI, tw channel is only 160km wide, not the occean
❤
Enter the Storm Shadow cruise missile.
U mean the useless so called missile of the Brits?
@@112313 Enter ATACMS. Goodnight Ivan 😭
a subsonic deep strike cruise missile is pretty much useless in a war with China unless you can fire hundreds of them at the same time. Despite popular belief but China also has Close-in Weapon systems on all their ships.
@@urcompnioncube0213 That's what the Russians thought as well.
@@truesouth4784Comparing Russia to China is incorrect. We shouldn't marginalize China just yet. On a micro-level, If our units deploy to war with a mindset that China is not a serious adversary ... it will be bad day. For perspective: A 2019 DoD Report on World Major Powers, the US is 14 times the military and economic strength of Russia (pre-Ukraine war), but only 1.3 times that of China. The EU is 12 times stronger than Russia, yet China has surpassed the EU. According to the DoD Report, China is the only country identified as a near-peer adversary with platform capabilities comparable to, if not exceeding, those of the US. The same report also rates countries on a scale of 0 to 4, with 4 representing highly probably dominance and 0 indicating near zero \ negligible presence. Outside of 300km, the US is rated at 3-4, while inside 300km, the report lists China as a 4, not a 3 and the US as a 2. yes, 2!
China’s future artificial reefs.
Yes, those USN carriers do make very good reefs when they are sunk.
@@gelinrefiraweak response, chink.
@@gelinrefira No No Cham, I said CHINA’s ships. Can’t even come up with your own cut. Fuckin morons.
@@gelinrefira Single carrier lost means Malacca strait shut down & shipments for aggressor confiscated
@@abdiganiaden That is to be expected if the US went to war with China, regardless whether or not any US ship was sunk.
china should beach one of the oldest ones next to the sierra madre
Ukraine has taught everyone how to deal with ships from supposedly superior navy.
Exactly! Vietnam, Iraq, Afganistan tought everyone again and again how to deal with GIs from a supposedly World's most-est best-est military.
Well wel what we have here and it is another Chinese PLA Navy floating junk the Type 072 Landing Ship Transport or LST
Hmmm why would a country, that possibly wants to invade an island, want to build more amphibious ships
How does a country invade its own island?
You can only invade what is not yours, like Iraq or Afghanistan.
Or 1962 war.
@@SwazzerProductionsbecause that island has its own form of government and not being controlled by the mainlanders?
@@paulsteaven Considering this is a civil war, it should be called reconquest rather than invasion.
It should be called agression against the only democracy in China
Mainland fleet have a max capacity of 100.000 man and 50.000 vehicles taiwan have 165.000 soldiers best wishes with this odds to invade Taiwan
You forget a 0 and a five. It have 1,500,000 active members
@@riceball4u172 yes and all the PLA can do the waterwalk?
@@randomwalk5095 no but there are civilian transportation
Lol, When landing one force they turn back and get another one, and then another one, Taiwans defenders are not located in 1 single area…
@@riceball4u172 i can't believe of roro ferrys plan it's a recipe for sure failure a roro ferry is a civilian ship not a navy one with no protection and active defense, artillery shelling will do a butchcraft of the poors PLA marines
Continuare gli ALLENAMENTI. Una sola China. 🙋♂️✊🇨🇳
AND HOW DID YOU GET THIS INFO???🥸🤡🤷🏼🤦🏼♂️