The Baltic Aquascaphe GMT is a real value proposition...and there's no waitlist!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 94

  • @zachs.4333
    @zachs.4333 Рік тому +4

    I have a Baltic Aquascaphe GMT and it runs about 1.5 seconds fast per day! Mine came with a slip of paper showing that they’d regulated it to +2 seconds per day at factory. Love the watch, have taken it on international trips with me :)

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому +2

      Ah, thanks for telling me, Zach. Maybe for units they send out to reviewers, they're just 'review' pieces and the actual purchasers get something regulated! As it should be. I'll pin your comment so people know 👌🏻

  • @gh2inc
    @gh2inc 10 місяців тому +3

    My Baltic GMT is +/- 5 seconds per day. I had a warranty issue that….Baltic responded within hours. Excellent service.

  • @bradmarcus26
    @bradmarcus26 6 місяців тому +2

    I have the Baltic aquascaphe blue in bronze. My first and last watch. Perfect for me.

  • @teeKeri
    @teeKeri Рік тому +3

    What a wonderful watch, it has everything i look for ,and this company is definately on the right track.
    The movement seems to be a question mark though 🤔 Thank You for reviewing ♥

  • @AlexanderB.
    @AlexanderB. Рік тому +2

    This is a truly lovely piece mate! I'm glad they are using domed sapphire crystals as opposed to acrylic, at least with their Aquascaphe line. Speaking of which: a couple of months ago I purchased a pre-loved Aquascaphe Dual Crown and I couldn't be happier with it. It contains a Miyota 9039 and it totally runs within chronometer specs. Maybe the new Miyota 9075 true GMT movement is a viable alternative for them to consider for future batches of this watch. I like that you're constantly working on improving your videos with numerous tweaks, excellent stuff mate!

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому +1

      They're choosing crystals that really capture the essence of an acrylic one - that insane doming, but without it being annoying on the wrist, or bulbous or anything like that. Also, congrats on that piece. They look sweet. I like the look of those, and the Traska Seafarer, with similar looks. That also has the Miyota 9039, as does another watch I'm currently reviewing. I'm enjoying the no-date watches more and more these days, it seems! Hopefully I'll get a look at something with that 9075 true GMT movement, too, which the BOLDR Odyssey GMT has, funnily enough... And thanks so much for the kind words, Alex - honestly, it really means a lot. Get a pic of that Baltic up on the ol' Instagram, too! Just checked your profile to see it but couldn't find it (but did lust after that Nodus Sector a bit!).

  • @adk7962
    @adk7962 Рік тому +1

    Entertaining review as always! Didn’t know much about Baltic. But you’re right. If you can afford it, the watch has a lot of value for the price.

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому +1

      Thanks so much!! It’s in a competitive price bracket, but I think they hold their own with the likes of Zelos, Venezianico, Maen etc - certainly in terms of design.

  • @WjH14
    @WjH14 Рік тому

    I have this exact watch and absolutely love it. The design and proportions are perfect. I agree with you on the accuracy; not great. The crown system is a bit unpredictable too. Overall the looks and execution are phenomenal. Love this Baltic!

  • @HRM.H
    @HRM.H Рік тому +3

    Im waiting for the day baltic releases something manual wind. Not that their watches are overly thick, but i'd love a slim dress/daily piece from them.

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      They have the MR01 - that’s got a micro rotor! I think they’re a bit overpriced on the secondary market but in theory should be much closer to a manual wind in terms of dimensions 👌🏻

    • @HRM.H
      @HRM.H Рік тому

      @@LumePip yeah i know of the MR01, im just not a fan of the hangzhou movements. Owned a Sugess with it and had nothing but issues. Still prefer my old Buren cal. 1281 powered watches.

  • @darkwingduckish
    @darkwingduckish Рік тому

    Thanks for the review! - my Baltic GMT came with a control sheet that shows +13s/d, and worn the C125 gained up to 19s/d. I requested that, they stated this as high, but normal. I wouldn't wanna call this "regulation" acceptable, because the C125 can do so much better. Probably they don't regulate the mvts. at all, they just run them on a grapher. So I regulated this to a deviation range of -1 to +4 s/d min_max. all positions, and that is, how it's running the last 8 months. I remember the caseback beeing almost unscrewed, when I inspected the watch closely after arriving, that never would have been water resist. Man! That should not happen. Also fixed this & got it pressure tested by a watchmaker. And he approved my regulation ;) Now it is indeed a beautiful watch: love the design, great functionality, very good finishing, rest of QC did well - no dust on the black laquered dial, flawless hands & markers. Nice :) And I recommend the BOR bracelet, it's good stuff. But don't accept the lume to be something like Zelos style - it is initially nice & evenly applied, but fades a bit fast.

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому +1

      Nice job on the regulation! But you’re so right about the caseback - hopefully this is the exception and not the rule 🙏🏻the model I reviewed was actually fine in this respect and the QC was obviously pretty great, but it would be good for more regulation, though others have reported their movements are running great. A beautiful watch, nonetheless! 👌🏻

    • @zoltankaparthy9095
      @zoltankaparthy9095 Рік тому

      How do you regulate it?

  • @darrellzayac3441
    @darrellzayac3441 Рік тому

    Love your humour. Wonderful review insightful, entertaining and informative just as it should be.

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      Thanks so much for saying that, Darrell, that means a lot 🙌🏻

  • @robcameron9351
    @robcameron9351 Рік тому

    Such a good review, nicely done. Always good for a couple chuckles! The point system is perfect.

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      Ah, thanks so much, Rob 🙌🏻honestly, that means a lot and I’m glad you enjoyed it

  • @betog.6229
    @betog.6229 Рік тому

    Love your sense of humor. I've bought the Baltic MR-01 but it still not here but I'm very excited. I think Baltic might grow to be amazing. But I would really like to see the movement. I don't like closed case backs!

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому +1

      Thanks so much, mate. That is an absolutely stunning looking watch - great choice. And you get to see that beautiful micro-rotor movement. Let me know how it is! 🙌

  • @HRM.H
    @HRM.H Рік тому +4

    Accuracy could be due to it being magnetized during shipping. But i assume youve already tested and demagnetized it.

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      Yeah, very good point - but tbf it is within the parameters so my suspicion is that it’s just not regulated and that’s kind of just how it is with this one ☹️

  • @JacK-yr8ri
    @JacK-yr8ri Рік тому

    for some reason youtube hasn't been showing me your videos even though I was subscribed. now to watch them all and catch up

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому +1

      THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!! 😅 I'm gonna use this as the reason my subscriber count isn't in the millions yet... Hope you enjoy them, mate!

  • @tomlau
    @tomlau Рік тому

    Agree on your point about the accuracy. Mine runs +15 spd and the power reserve doesn't last as long as I expect sometimes.

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      Yeah, it’s hardly COSC standards. I’m curious to know, because I’ve kind of relaxed on my attitude to accuracy of late, but would you pay more for that kind of COSC regulation?

    • @tomlau
      @tomlau Рік тому

      @@LumePip yeah if I were to get a gmt today I would consider the longines 39mm. Hopefully there will be more similar sized COSC GMTs in the future.

  • @endlessrage4062
    @endlessrage4062 Рік тому

    Handsome looking watch. I am a big fan of the six o’clock date window. At first glance it looks like the love child of a Chris Ward Aquitaine and a Longines Spirit Zulu…
    I think the movement and lack of bracelet is the main cons.

  • @lacanian_lifter
    @lacanian_lifter Рік тому

    New subscriber, loving every video I've watched so far

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому +1

      Thanks so much for saying so - it really means a lot 🙌🏻glad you’re enjoying them

  • @jonathans3267
    @jonathans3267 9 місяців тому

    I have been thinking of pulling the trigger on this watch for a while now, but concerns about the level of accuracy would prevent me from spending that amount of money. Shame because it's stunning.

  • @Moors463
    @Moors463 Рік тому

    Love the review Pip

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      Thanks, Chris! 🤙🏻🤙🏻🤙🏻

  • @WristWatching
    @WristWatching Рік тому

    Excellent review as always! I’ve been eyeing this Baltic for a while now. It looks gorgeous, but there’s stiff competition in that price range. Choices, choices…

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому +1

      Thanks very much, mate! It’s a beauty but you’re dead right - there’s so much good stuff competing around that price. If you look on the secondary market, too, you can get good deals on Oris around that price. But I think this has such a beautifully executed design!

  • @karlsenula9495
    @karlsenula9495 Рік тому +2

    I think I prefer the Aquascaphe classic (BP Fifty Fathoms homage).

  • @harrietboulding1459
    @harrietboulding1459 Рік тому

    Great video as always 👏🏼

  • @AngusMacPherson-ch9wh
    @AngusMacPherson-ch9wh 6 місяців тому

    Fantastic review, thanks 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇺🇸👏👏👏👏

  • @eugenevedensky6071
    @eugenevedensky6071 Рік тому +1

    May I humbly nominate the Lorier Hyperion as a beautiful neo vintage gmt design with the same movement for less cost?

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      Bud, someone else also suggested this. You’re so right - it looks like a stunner. I might try and see if they want me to review one 😝they send PolyWatch with it too, thank god 🤣

  • @claudtalkz2194
    @claudtalkz2194 Рік тому

    I was looking at the Vaer offering. Reached out to their customer service, crickets…. So I’m looking at this now but the accuracy gah

  • @texasjourneyman207
    @texasjourneyman207 Рік тому

    That's a beautiful watch!!!!!

  • @gmotionedc5412
    @gmotionedc5412 Рік тому

    Man if it had a sellita I prob would get one all things being equal. I like the green one.

  • @Jassique
    @Jassique Рік тому

    do you know if the watch is anti magnetic? i can not find any information about that

  • @drewbienor
    @drewbienor Рік тому

    Can you please review the CW Aquatine GMT?

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому +1

      I'd love to, mate, and I did ask CW's marketing people but think there was a queue of reviewers waiting for some of these later models. My channel's smallfry so sometimes I have to wait a fair bit!

    • @drewbienor
      @drewbienor Рік тому

      @@LumePip Hope you get one to review. I couldnt find that many aquatine GMT reviews.

  • @robertmcnee682
    @robertmcnee682 Рік тому

    Very informative

  • @holokron1337
    @holokron1337 Рік тому

    I love this watch! It's my microbrand grail 😁

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому +1

      Nice, mate - definitely attainable!

    • @holokron1337
      @holokron1337 Рік тому

      @@LumePip Not where I live 😭

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      @@holokron1337 Ah, no, where is that?!

  • @brianmurphy8154
    @brianmurphy8154 Рік тому

    Wow...for that price Baltic really needs to fix that accuracy. Agree, the beads of rice bracelet on their website looks great...great looking piece...Jack Mason has a new GMT as well, very similar specs....still...my $100 beater with an NH35 shouldnt be more accurate....great video as always, cheers! Also, nice backhand at Bouldr...hahahaha

    • @chillilover8345
      @chillilover8345 Рік тому

      if you want an accurate watch buy quartz bro... its more accurate than grand seiko you fool

    • @brianmurphy8154
      @brianmurphy8154 Рік тому

      @@chillilover8345 and an Apple Watch is more accurate than a quartz…we are talking about automatics…keep up skippy

    • @chillilover8345
      @chillilover8345 Рік тому +1

      @@brianmurphy8154 electronic / quartz they are all the same boat. if that is the case go buy an apple watch... dont waste time and effort on mechanical watch. Even grandseiko looses or gains time. If you are looking for mechanical watch, you should be looking at the whole package, not just one aspect.

    • @brianmurphy8154
      @brianmurphy8154 Рік тому

      @@chillilover8345 I’m not looking at one aspect but I am looking at probably the most important aspect of a mechanical watch. That being it’s ability keep accurate time. As I stated, for that price, my expectation is that it be more accurate than what the video reported. It’s not my fault your standard is lower. Maybe you should expect more, not me less.

    • @HRM.H
      @HRM.H Рік тому

      ​​@@brianmurphy8154 you do realize it would cost about 100 to 120 usd more PER watch to get them COSC certified?? Baltic is focussed on value for money, if you want accuracy in this price range, just buy a quartz already.

  • @markloubser2433
    @markloubser2433 Рік тому

    This is the finest in its class. Been eyeballing Baltic for some time. My Ama diver is very similair with the beads of rice. The Sopra seems a questionable choice.....

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому +1

      I might have a TOOL WATCH CO review coming up soon… I think not enough brands utilise beads of rice bracelets. They look fantastic and are as comfy as hell

  • @iangraham705
    @iangraham705 Рік тому

    Lorier hyperion very similar vibe to this but with a hesalite crystal, so even more of a vintage vibe

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      Ian, great shout 👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻I’d love to review one. Maybe they’ll see this and get in touch… Or more likely, I could try my hand at seeing if they want me to check it out. I can tell them a couple of people have said they should! 😅

    • @iangraham705
      @iangraham705 Рік тому

      @@LumePip I’ve got a Neptune v3 if you want to borrow it for review

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      @@iangraham705 That would be amazing, and I'd absolutely love to! Would you be able to send me an email at shallowpip@gmail.com so we could arrange something? Thanks so much!🙌

    • @iangraham705
      @iangraham705 Рік тому

      @@LumePip email sent

  • @endlessrage4062
    @endlessrage4062 Рік тому

    Ah, my bad, I spoke too early. The CW was referenced… 😳

  • @TheChadWork2001
    @TheChadWork2001 Рік тому +7

    Water resistence over 100M is irrelevant. People just need a waterproof watch, they don't go diving in general. And below 100M is unlikely. 100M should be the standard on all watches.

    • @HRM.H
      @HRM.H Рік тому +3

      100 meter waterresistance rating isnt actually resistant to 100 meters. Read up on the topic a bit before commenting next time...

    • @TheChadWork2001
      @TheChadWork2001 Рік тому +1

      @@HRM.H I know what it means. Their resistance is typically more than their rating. I'm saying anything over 100M its irrelevant when it comes to practical need for the average person. Read up on my comment a bit before assuming I'm attacking you.

    • @rolandthanksjesus4733
      @rolandthanksjesus4733 Рік тому +1

      sure it's not about the depth almost nobody dives, rather it's a mark of quality and build quality

    • @rolandthanksjesus4733
      @rolandthanksjesus4733 Рік тому +2

      @@TheChadWork2001 That's wrong if a watch says 5 bar, for example, you can only wash your hands with it and not dive 50 meters deep, it's exactly the opposite of what you claim

  • @franz6595
    @franz6595 15 днів тому

    this was funny as hell

  • @Makingnewnamesisdumb
    @Makingnewnamesisdumb Рік тому

    The website says the thickness is 12mm including the crystal. Is it really 13.5mm? Why do they be lying like that?

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      Could that be they're actually measuring just the case without the crystal but mistakenly labelling it as without? I had it on the calipers, just like I do with all the watches. Not sure about that one! It still wears extremely well and like a slim diver, if that makes any sense haha

  • @caktaylor
    @caktaylor Рік тому

    A bit of trivia...Soprod is owned by Festina Group.

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      Ah, nice one, Kevin - I didn't know that. When I was living in Spain, Festina watches were everywhere. Their designs never did anything for me, though! Maybe they save their best thinkers in that group for the movement makers! 😅

  • @cosmodoc
    @cosmodoc Рік тому

    I would get a Lorier GMT instead, prefer the design

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      I might get to try one of these out soon! 🤙🏻🤙🏻🤙🏻

  • @thegorn
    @thegorn Рік тому

    None of these wristwatch GMTs are in any way "true GMTs" in that they are all useless in the many parts of the world which are 1/2 hour offsets from UTC 0. The only terms i accept are "caller GMT" and "traveller GMT". I like what Baltic are doing.

    • @LumePip
      @LumePip  Рік тому

      Yeah, that's a fair point - it's not a bugbear for me personally, but I haven't had a 'true' GMT in for review yet, so would love to see what all the fuss is about, especially if I could do so while actually travelling!

  • @TheChadWork2001
    @TheChadWork2001 Рік тому

    Just go for Tudor. You'll get a Rolex superlative chronometer movement for half the price.

    • @giusepperocchi2979
      @giusepperocchi2979 Рік тому +1

      Or Longines, and you get cosc for half Tudor price.

    • @HRM.H
      @HRM.H Рік тому

      Or just go for SpringDrive if you are THIS worried about timekeeping. Itll smoke ANY Tudor or Rolex🤣

    • @grantmcwilliam
      @grantmcwilliam Рік тому

      Or get 2 Casio FW91 for £20. Wear one on each wrist, one set to GMT, and the other set to your current time zone. You will also have a useful alarm on each watch.

  • @marcosd999
    @marcosd999 9 місяців тому

    It's ok, but not very accurate for a piece in that price range and I'm personally not bothered about a GMT, I'd rather have a 'minute' bezel.

  • @marko8698
    @marko8698 Рік тому

    A nice looking watch badly executed.
    Glare from Crystal.
    Accuracy from a watch in that price range.
    For that’s sort of money I expect more.
    As for accuracy manufacturers don’t give a monkeys
    Whether it’s + or - 1 or 15 as long as it’s within tolerance.
    I’ve got Metas ,Cosc and superlative certification watches and the best timekeeping watch I have is a 20 year old Omega which was serviced by local Watchmaker.
    Who actually spent time and took pride in his work not working on a product line.

  • @jaybrockmeyer9218
    @jaybrockmeyer9218 Рік тому

    DON'T buy any baltic watches, they are garbage. I ordered their mr01 for 605 euros, paid in full, in advance. I received the watch 7 months later. It ran 9 MINUTES per hour fast. I did not mis-type the last sentence. 9 MINUTES per hour fast, not 9 seconds. And the bor bracelet was very cheap, I have $100 watches with vastly superior bracelets. And they will not provide a return shipping label to return their garbage product. Live & learn. RUN from the GARBAGE company !

  • @TheChadWork2001
    @TheChadWork2001 Рік тому +1

    The only reason Rolex is the leader is because all the other watch manufacturers refuse to regulate ALL their watches to +/-2 / day like Rolex does. THIS is why they are more desired than any other watch. I hate inaccurate mechanical movements. They slack off, and Rolex doesn't.

    • @jim_bocho
      @jim_bocho Рік тому

      The only reason Rolex is the leader is because of what it represents. It’s hype and the aura of „I’ve made it“. Not saying they make bad watches, of course not, but they are not special compared to the direct competition - which Baltic is not.