I love the 465's......... IF THEY ARE IN THE HITACHI MOTOR OPTION Plans were drawn up in 2007 to improve the reliability of the BREL and ABB units. (Class 465/0 & /1's) By the installation of the new traction equipment. The new package was developed by Hitachi Rail. It was retrofitted all across 97 Class 465 /0 & /1 trains over the course of 2009/2010. The supplier/manufacturer of the original traction equipment, worked as a consulants to assist in the retro-fitting the new equipment.
I love the Class 465 trains alot I wish it was just them and the Class 377 trains that were running and serving every single station in London, Kent, Essex, Surrey, Sussex and Dorset.
I love the 465s so much! I have vertigo and the 465s are the only trains which align properly with the platform so there isn't a big gap or a big step up. I expect this is because they were made by British Rail Engineering Limited for our own platforms, and not by foreign companies like the newer trains. The 376s are horrible, and Thameslink trains even worse for the gap. I hope we keep some 465s for as long as possible. I love the sound of the motor too!
If some of the sources I've ran into are correct, then In theory the class 465 metro cammels could be uprated to 100mph if they were geared that way and not with much difficulty I'd assume (maybe traction efficiency would have to be upgraded a bit for optimum acceleration too) anywho, Each motor is supposedly capable of 280kw according to Angel trains, that's a ton of power per unit. And more than enough to power an average 100mph capable unit in general. That's around 1840kw per unit if the total power is being used , But the unit in reality actually only uses around 1200kw (because of third rail) so if that is correct , then only 150kw per motor is being used, which is just over half of each motors total power. (,they have 8 motors per 4 car unit) The point is, maybe uprating their max speed wouldnt break the motors . But it may break the train without appropriate mods. I.e using lateral dampers and more secure parts being added to the unit? Who knows tbh maybe it doesent need major changes. It would be cool to see regardless
Aah the memories, these trains (sometimes in combo with 466s) have been serving my local area for decades - the twilight years of the British Rail era as Network SouthEast (though I was not alive for this) all throughout the Connex South Eastern, South Eastern Trains and Southeastern (Govia and then DfT) eras, up to the present day. They're used for stopping commuter services, in my case from my local station out to Sevenoaks or up to Charing X/Cannon Street. (Southeastern reserves the faster, more modern and plush 375s for speedier services to and from deeper within Kent; another local station near me provides access to these.) Fond memories of going to school, heading up to London as a kid (and now, for that matter) and that sense of wonder of getting to see the wide wide world and having a fun day out. Newer, better trains will replace them over time and that's good, but I definitely will miss these white, boxy, blobby things, the noises they make, their pleasant if somewhat cramped interiors, the way the announcements sound... I'm glad the memory of them is being preserved. I really appreciate fellow transport/infrastructure nerds like I taking the effort to do so. Transport doesn't just move people around, it facilitates wonderful memories being made.
That's because some 365s were originally 465s, they were just based on a modified variant of the 465 and converted to go 100mph and have overhead wires as a power source. Their motors arent actually the same, I did a little research, but their motors were built by the same company hence why they have similar noises
@@bb-3653 No they just weren't suited to express journeys that's all. 387s are better because they have carpts, air con, tables, plug sockets etc. The seats weren't amazing but they weren't ironing board
To get Into the gritty details, 465/2&9 had those "365" noise before 365 existed. But that being said, they actually have different motors despite sounding the same which can get confusing, I understand. Certain parts of their technology are from the same manufacturing companies though
British Railway Network Stock = Train Numbers 1 - 50 ABB Networkers 1 - 47 (Classed As: “/1”) Metropolitan Cammell Network Stock Classified As: “/2” No. 1, No.2, No. 3, No. 4 No. 5, No. 6, No. 7, No. 8 No. 9, No. ᘔ, No. [], No. 10 No. 11, No. 12, No. 13, No. 14 Revised Variations 1 - 34 Are Reclassed As A: “/9” The Deluxe Cabin End Trailers Are Classified As A “/9” A Catenary AutoCoach Is Classed As: “/3” Available On Live Rail Driving Trailers (Built) Cabless Trailers (Built: More Of These Per Set) Cabless Trailer (Catering: In Need Of Construction) Cabless Trailers (Sleeper: In Need Of Construction)
The other day I saw a BREL 465 at Tonbridge and I have a video of it on my channel, feel free to check it out. BREL 465s would only travel down to Tonbridge if a MetCam 465 is Unavailable, bit like when 465s went down to Ashford, it was normally a MetCam, but every once in a while a BREL one takes place, usually if a MetCam 465 had failed or some sort of Incident
@@awesometrainsandbuses you got a point the brel ones do come down on a stopper back and forth during divert weekends when trains go to Victoria instead of charging cross
I love 465s, they are the best in my opinion
We can tell by your picture
they also sound like the 96 stock
Gotta love those 96 stock trains
@@awesometrainsandbuses yh i agree. My favorite LU stock is the '96
B r u s h
I love the 465's......... IF THEY ARE IN THE HITACHI MOTOR OPTION
Plans were drawn up in 2007 to improve the reliability of the BREL and ABB units. (Class 465/0 & /1's) By the installation of the new traction equipment. The new package was developed by Hitachi Rail. It was retrofitted all across 97 Class 465 /0 & /1 trains over the course of 2009/2010. The supplier/manufacturer of the original traction equipment, worked as a consulants to assist in the retro-fitting the new equipment.
definitely not! the BREL ones (the /2 & /9) are to good ones, the /0 & /1s are awful!
@@thetransporthub I disagree but respect your opinion: 🤡
you mouth shut: 😎
What's so good about the /0s and /1s then? Do you like the 365s?
@@thetransporthub I like Both 465/9s and 465/1s alot mainly because of the motor sounds
the Train simulator AP Class 465 has a /9 But they could have done a better job on the model for the /2 and the /9
I love the Class 465 trains alot I wish it was just them and the Class 377 trains that were running and serving every single station in London, Kent, Essex, Surrey, Sussex and Dorset.
465/9s in first class was on the front and on the rear on every carriage. That's pretty cool 👍👌
2:46 that spark looks very nice. Great video.
Thanks
3rd rail
0:00 British Railway Networker No. 30 (Right) & Metropolitan Cammell Network Stock #30 (Left)
I love the 465s so much! I have vertigo and the 465s are the only trains which align properly with the platform so there isn't a big gap or a big step up. I expect this is because they were made by British Rail Engineering Limited for our own platforms, and not by foreign companies like the newer trains. The 376s are horrible, and Thameslink trains even worse for the gap. I hope we keep some 465s for as long as possible. I love the sound of the motor too!
If some of the sources I've ran into are correct, then In theory the class 465 metro cammels could be uprated to 100mph if they were geared that way and not with much difficulty I'd assume (maybe traction efficiency would have to be upgraded a bit for optimum acceleration too) anywho, Each motor is supposedly capable of 280kw according to Angel trains, that's a ton of power per unit. And more than enough to power an average 100mph capable unit in general.
That's around 1840kw per unit if the total power is being used , But the unit in reality actually only uses around 1200kw (because of third rail) so if that is correct , then only 150kw per motor is being used, which is just over half of each motors total power. (,they have 8 motors per 4 car unit)
The point is, maybe uprating their max speed wouldnt break the motors . But it may break the train without appropriate mods. I.e using lateral dampers and more secure parts being added to the unit? Who knows tbh maybe it doesent need major changes. It would be cool to see regardless
I love the Networkers like so much and thats mostly the class 465/1's they have that nice motor thats like music to my ears.
Much rather the /2s and /9s for motor noise
@@thetransporthub I cant say nothing as they sound brilliant as well but I have my favourites for the /1's.
All of the 465s for me
@@awesometrainsandbuses And In first class (only 465/9s)
Who ever designed these had a very good imagination lol
Aah the memories, these trains (sometimes in combo with 466s) have been serving my local area for decades - the twilight years of the British Rail era as Network SouthEast (though I was not alive for this) all throughout the Connex South Eastern, South Eastern Trains and Southeastern (Govia and then DfT) eras, up to the present day. They're used for stopping commuter services, in my case from my local station out to Sevenoaks or up to Charing X/Cannon Street. (Southeastern reserves the faster, more modern and plush 375s for speedier services to and from deeper within Kent; another local station near me provides access to these.)
Fond memories of going to school, heading up to London as a kid (and now, for that matter) and that sense of wonder of getting to see the wide wide world and having a fun day out. Newer, better trains will replace them over time and that's good, but I definitely will miss these white, boxy, blobby things, the noises they make, their pleasant if somewhat cramped interiors, the way the announcements sound... I'm glad the memory of them is being preserved. I really appreciate fellow transport/infrastructure nerds like I taking the effort to do so. Transport doesn't just move people around, it facilitates wonderful memories being made.
Best one yet of my favourite trains, was waiting for this vid!!
2:20 sound like VAL 206 automatic subway Matra Siemens (Lille, Toulouse in France for example)
Nope, just the transformer and the new motor from hitachi. The old ones were better.
@@tob19 ikr
To hell with the city beams, I wish they had the 465/2 units stick around
cool they are my fav trains i hope they are still a round for a long time still
The first ones are being withdrawn this month
well this aged badly
1:28 did anyone notice the graffiti on the first 2 coaches
Sure did
Is it me, or am I lucky to have loads of 465s passing through my window?
The one at platform 1 made a noise like it’s stopw
Great compilation! Greetings :-)
I really miss the /2s I doubt it but I'd preffer them to replace the hitachis since they are faster to max speed and overall.
They sound like the 96 stock
very similar motors
@@thetransporthub yeah they have both Alstom
LOCAL TRAIN BANTER WOO!
The class 465/9 and class 466/0 traction motors sound identical to the class 365
they are identical
That's because some 365s were originally 465s, they were just based on a modified variant of the 465 and converted to go 100mph and have overhead wires as a power source. Their motors arent actually the same, I did a little research, but their motors were built by the same company hence why they have similar noises
When the class 365 was first introduced, they used to have the same bodyshell and face as the 466 and 465s but they changed the face somewhere in 2003
@@Great_WesternTVFan The 465s back then had a flat front but now the 465s have an Anti- climbing Front
Like the 365’s, these are nice
465s and the 365s are their family.
365s are nice until you have to travel on them
@@moose_ringo9161 will I filmed them on my videos at Kings Cross at night time
@@moose_ringo9161 their not nice? I assume they have ironing bored seats like the 700s.
@@bb-3653 No they just weren't suited to express journeys that's all. 387s are better because they have carpts, air con, tables, plug sockets etc. The seats weren't amazing but they weren't ironing board
me love their sound :)
Awesome! :)
Thanks! 😄
You take to strood from London bridge via greavsend
How can I tell if the 465s are using Hitachi or the classic 365 motor?
The sound mainly, /0s and /1s are the Hitachi ones and /2s and /9s are the proper motors
To get Into the gritty details, 465/2&9 had those "365" noise before 365 existed. But that being said, they actually have different motors despite sounding the same which can get confusing, I understand. Certain parts of their technology are from the same manufacturing companies though
Nice one friend good video
Nice video 📹 👍
Thanks
Diz diz dia
Love it... 😁👍
Great video
Thanks
some of these class 465s sounds like a class 365
2:21 I don’t know what station it is
Chelsfield
@@thetransporthuboh ok. Thanks
Nah, when it comes to "moving off sounds", 323s win out
Alstom very nice
whats the station at 2:11 i forgot
New Cross
@@thetransporthub thx
Why haven't you done the class 460's
He didn't have them on his videos sadly 😢😢😔
Ur profile pic is my fav train in the world
They dont actually exist anymore, probably didnt have footage of them
I like the south easterns
British Railway Network Stock = Train Numbers 1 - 50
ABB Networkers 1 - 47 (Classed As: “/1”)
Metropolitan Cammell Network Stock
Classified As: “/2”
No. 1, No.2, No. 3, No. 4
No. 5, No. 6, No. 7, No. 8
No. 9, No. ᘔ, No. [], No. 10
No. 11, No. 12, No. 13, No. 14
Revised Variations 1 - 34 Are Reclassed As A: “/9”
The Deluxe Cabin End Trailers Are Classified As A “/9”
A Catenary AutoCoach Is Classed As: “/3”
Available On Live Rail
Driving Trailers (Built)
Cabless Trailers (Built: More Of These Per Set)
Cabless Trailer (Catering: In Need Of Construction)
Cabless Trailers (Sleeper: In Need Of Construction)
I'm from tonbridge so I've seen alot of networker and the /0 and /1 are best, however they run /2 and /9 here now :(
The other day I saw a BREL 465 at Tonbridge and I have a video of it on my channel, feel free to check it out.
BREL 465s would only travel down to Tonbridge if a MetCam 465 is Unavailable, bit like when 465s went down to Ashford, it was normally a MetCam, but every once in a while a BREL one takes place, usually if a MetCam 465 had failed or some sort of Incident
@@awesometrainsandbuses you got a point the brel ones do come down on a stopper back and forth during divert weekends when trains go to Victoria instead of charging cross
/9s and /2s are alot faster at accelerating as well as having first class that's probably why their more frequent.
Em ovo acf e não disse nada também
Class 465 is the worst train made - they are so unfresh
313s exist so that's not true at all
Class 376
the class 455 wants a word with you
Electric car sounds: 🥱👎
Electric Multiple Unit train sounds: 😎👍