The truth behind the Royal Oak's construction

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лис 2022
  • Read more: timeandtidewatches.com/
    Join the club: www.timeandtide.club/
    Shop: shop.timeandtidewatches.com/
    INSTAGRAM
    @timetidewatches
    FACEBOOK
    / timetidewatches
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 30

  • @alectang1614
    @alectang1614 Рік тому +13

    Tim Mosso has been telling us for the longest time that the Royal Oak bezel does not have screws. It has bolts. And the screws are from the caseback.

    • @TheRausing1
      @TheRausing1 Рік тому +3

      Yeah, but you really just have to look at them. They’re hexagons so obviously they can’t screw

    • @alectang1614
      @alectang1614 Рік тому

      @@TheRausing1 yes, which annoys me when watch commentators call them screws. They're clearly not.

    • @Vanbul1
      @Vanbul1 Рік тому

      They're bolts with a slotted screw head design. So it's understandable a bit misleading at first glance.

  • @Fanzyify
    @Fanzyify Рік тому +11

    Mate, that blazer's button is about to to shoot someone in the head. 😅

  • @alectang1614
    @alectang1614 Рік тому +5

    This guy keeps talking about the importance of the mono-bloc case yet AP had been making the previous few generations all in three piece cases.
    Glad to see AP have some integrity again and not skimping anymore by making the newest iteration with a mono-bloc case again.

  • @tarasmathers7423
    @tarasmathers7423 Рік тому

    Really a design and engineering marvel of it's time. With it's brutalist architecture, it brought industrial design, into the mainstream of fashion. I knew about the "through bolting bezel," but I was not aware of the oversized inner gasket. Thank you Andrew, for sharing this video. Understanding is key in life, or so I believe. Cheers my friend, and best wishes.....

  • @minusED
    @minusED 9 місяців тому

    Great vid! More insides and details - many watches have secrets and interesting parts. Please do not stop

  • @stevenwebb9861
    @stevenwebb9861 Рік тому +1

    Great video, thank you. I am wating, I love the 15202 everything is perfect to me, the best watch period. Fingers crossed!

  • @irawolf
    @irawolf Рік тому +2

    Damn, now that I understand the engineering behind the design, I want one! Its simplicity is brilliant!

  • @MohammedKhaled-ju7gy
    @MohammedKhaled-ju7gy Рік тому +1

    AP- beating the same old horse to turn it into a new unicorn

  • @thereismoretolifethanrolex
    @thereismoretolifethanrolex Рік тому +1

    Personally, I'd undo them all and set them at different positions just to piss people off 🤣

    • @marcusflack1523
      @marcusflack1523 Рік тому

      HAHAHAHAHAHA def the best suggestion I have seen in a while in regard to AP. You sir....are THE MAN

  • @DS-vx3wf
    @DS-vx3wf Рік тому +1

    is he wearing 15202IP ?

  • @Gregsheppo66
    @Gregsheppo66 Рік тому

    I can’t be.I’ve he said some people have attempted to unscrew the bolts from the top. The holes are octagonal, the bolt heads are also octagonal. On what planet would they be able to be unscrewed?

    • @jmemphisTX
      @jmemphisTX Рік тому

      People watch diy videos on UA-cam and think they can build a house Sooo……..
      Wouldn’t say it’s that surprising 😅

  • @alberoDiSpazio
    @alberoDiSpazio Рік тому

    I came here for the bezel screw.

  • @govtfunded
    @govtfunded Рік тому +1

    How resilient are they? Say, vs. a Submariner, for everyday wear in any and all conditions.

    • @Timeandtidewatches
      @Timeandtidewatches  Рік тому +1

      I have one - the 15500 - it's a sports watch, it's fine for everyday including swimming, but not dive ready like the Sub, which is 300m WR. Also, this is more of a scratch magnet, but on the upside, far more polished and like a disco ball on the wrist - Thanks for watching, Andrew

  • @TheRausing1
    @TheRausing1 Рік тому +2

    I’m sorry man but the jacket with pocket square and hoodie look is just not the way… you look like the kid at the country club who had to borrow a jacket to have lunch

    • @marcusflack1523
      @marcusflack1523 Рік тому

      Maybe you should give that advice to the CEO of AP as well.

    • @Timeandtidewatches
      @Timeandtidewatches  Рік тому +1

      I'm not here for my fashion forward fits thanks god - Andrew

  • @redcapitalist
    @redcapitalist Рік тому +4

    the truth behind the royal oak's construction - a simple machine made contraption that costs US$300 to make. lmao

    • @garyboyle695
      @garyboyle695 Рік тому +1

      You could say the same for any stainless steel watch case.

    • @timeisahumanconstruct9251
      @timeisahumanconstruct9251 11 місяців тому

      you should make them then and sell them out of your trunk

    • @vali69
      @vali69 7 місяців тому

      ​@@timeisahumanconstruct9251let me introduce you to chinese rep factories making ro reps for like 400 dollars. The catch is they're missing the finer detailing of the the manual brushing, people who buy these reps usually get them rebrushed by modders for this exact same reason, a few things here in there are also not accurate like the rotors not being made of gold, and the most obvious thing, the dials not being made with the same process and same vintage machine that ap has, tho their dials are getting better by the day and are ok. If it wasn't for the high demand paired with the low supply due to ap's limited output these watches wouldn't have been so expensive.

  • @arturgarncarz3631
    @arturgarncarz3631 Рік тому

    AP is the most overrated watch brand. The only thing they have is Genta's RO. Since 70s they have not presented any interesting watch.