Trump DISAVOWS Project 2025: ‘I Know Nothing’; JD Vance, Rubio, Burgum In VEEP Spotlight

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лип 2024
  • Robby Soave and Jessica Burbank react to Donald Trump distancing himself from Project 2025, and they discuss whispers that Trump has selected his vice presidential pick. #veep #trumpvp
    About Rising:
    Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day's political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day's political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country's most important political newsmakers.
    Follow Rising on social media:
    Website: Hill.TV
    Facebook: HillTVLive/
    Instagram: @HillTVLive
    Twitter: @HillTVLive

КОМЕНТАРІ • 308

  • @spearce133
    @spearce133 12 днів тому +12

    He's aware of it because he was told about it, read it, and disagreed with it.
    Her response about wanting people on staff that agree with him (in reference to Trump), that's no different than any other politiician. Kinda dumb response.

  • @modernjosephus356
    @modernjosephus356 13 днів тому +15

    The constitution doesn't mention any of the alphabet agency's either

    • @msimon6808
      @msimon6808 12 днів тому

      It is actually worse than that. There is no Drug Prohibition Amendment. The Feds lack Jurisdiction.

    • @Rook98766
      @Rook98766 11 днів тому

      Rubio

  • @justinvoelkel8650
    @justinvoelkel8650 13 днів тому +9

    I’m sorry but doesn’t every administration replace people with their own?

    • @Calleronline1-vf1eh
      @Calleronline1-vf1eh 12 днів тому +2

      Yes but you'll find varying political affiliations. Whereas P.2025 says they will fire employees to replace with only conservatives agents

    • @LG-km8fw
      @LG-km8fw 12 днів тому

      ​@@Calleronline1-vf1ehwell they're all Dems now so I don't see the problem.

    • @mikehawkins4752
      @mikehawkins4752 10 днів тому +1

      Only the politically appointed ones. Project 2025 wants to also replace those that aren't.

    • @denvan3143
      @denvan3143 8 днів тому

      This is good news; it is a tacit admission of defeat by the Democrats, that they know they have lost the White House, the house and the Senate in 2025. This is a desperate play by the Democrats to so dissension among the ranks of the winning party. The Dems are really, really grasping at straws now. 😄 ​@@mikehawkins4752

  • @jenifersantinole
    @jenifersantinole 13 днів тому +35

    I’m writing someone in this is horrid…. Trump should’ve picked Tulsi

    • @jefferydraper4019
      @jefferydraper4019 13 днів тому

      No, not really. Tulsi drank the Kool-Aid of the Democratic Party too fully. She needs to spend a few years detoxifying to show us that she isnt still one of them. A good appointment in the next administration under Trump would be a great start.

    • @wesleycorlynda8371
      @wesleycorlynda8371 13 днів тому +5

      He needs to pick a man, for many reasons this time.

    • @user-wx1oh5oy4s
      @user-wx1oh5oy4s 13 днів тому +4

      He hasn’t announced his pick yet. I hold out hope for Lt Col Tulsi Gabbard. Trump is a showman and might have put names out there just so it’s a surprise.

    • @wa-bu3ke
      @wa-bu3ke 13 днів тому +1

      @@wesleycorlynda8371 no

    • @wa-bu3ke
      @wa-bu3ke 13 днів тому

      he might

  • @ShamrockShanrock-ip5tx
    @ShamrockShanrock-ip5tx 13 днів тому +27

    I DON'T LIKE ANY OF HIS VP PICKS.I THINK BYRON DONALD'S WOULD BE PERFECT.

    • @christophermanley3602
      @christophermanley3602 13 днів тому +3

      Just because the yard signs would say “Trump Donalds”

    • @timwhite5562
      @timwhite5562 13 днів тому +2

      You need to tweak the bot, it's yelling for no particular reason

    • @SuperMissDaisey
      @SuperMissDaisey 13 днів тому +3

      I like Bryon And many others on the list Bryon has my attention always.

    • @Rook98766
      @Rook98766 11 днів тому

      I agree white woman from mississippi

    • @arthurfonzarelli9828
      @arthurfonzarelli9828 10 днів тому

      Those aren't his place president pics. Those are some pathetic mainstream media guesses. These people lost all their credibility years ago and shouldn't be taken serious. They might be right but it will be just cuz it was a guess and nothing else

  • @kabaduck
    @kabaduck 13 днів тому +6

    He's probably going to pick Vance, just because he knows he only has one term and he needs somebody to take over at the end of his term. Vance is the type of guy that could carry the legacy.

    • @deadgolfer6345
      @deadgolfer6345 13 днів тому

      Why couldn't the other guys take over at the end of the term?

  • @DarkLordJmac
    @DarkLordJmac 13 днів тому +41

    I love how something is written about conservative ideas, and the immediate reaction is to pearl clutch. Always a new boogeyman! Always be afraid!

    • @iMatti00
      @iMatti00 13 днів тому

      I love how a segment of society believes they have something of value to add but they are really just hypocritical because if the current administration did what was being planned, they would be screaming about how this isn’t an attack on all of America and many other things I can’t see in UA-cam without having my comment be made invisible.

    • @iMatti00
      @iMatti00 13 днів тому

      I love how a segment of society believes they have something of value to add but they are really just completely inconsistent (there is an H word for that too) because if the current administration did what was being planned, they would be screaming about how this isn’t an attack on all of America and many other things I can’t see in UA-cam without having my comment be made invisible.a

    • @Keepitkind7
      @Keepitkind7 12 днів тому +1

      Have you read it?

    • @bigjimtenbillion
      @bigjimtenbillion 10 днів тому

      Have you??

    • @Keepitkind7
      @Keepitkind7 10 днів тому

      @@bigjimtenbillion Yes

  • @dolfan1967atyahoo
    @dolfan1967atyahoo 13 днів тому +10

    Can't be Rubio...potus and vpotus can't be from the same state.

    • @Rook98766
      @Rook98766 11 днів тому

      I think is will be rubio

    • @AB-ol5uz
      @AB-ol5uz 11 днів тому

      ​@Rook98766 per constitution it can't be any one from FL as vp

    • @mikehawkins4752
      @mikehawkins4752 10 днів тому

      As if the law matters to Republicans.

    • @bigjimtenbillion
      @bigjimtenbillion 10 днів тому

      That's rich coming from the party if lawfare and communism style political persecution

    • @bigjimtenbillion
      @bigjimtenbillion 10 днів тому

      Of lawfare

  • @truthbtold7997
    @truthbtold7997 13 днів тому +12

    Americans want Vivek or Desantis nobody is really considering Vance Rubio or bergum dont understand how they are the top 3 picks

    • @user-fw2dd2cy3c
      @user-fw2dd2cy3c 12 днів тому +2

      I gotta agree with Jessica on this one: Trump doesn't like opposition.

    • @Rook98766
      @Rook98766 11 днів тому

      Rubio

  • @blick5815
    @blick5815 13 днів тому +5

    If you have never lived and worked in the Government Administrative World you have no idea just how much change and evolution is needed.
    SES, GS-15s and hordes of Contractors just churning on anything they have been doing for years and years and years with no results or progress towards fixing issues that our society desperately needs.
    Organizations making rules and enforcing way beyond what the law calls for or is needed and not accountable in any way

    • @msimon6808
      @msimon6808 12 днів тому

      Lies are very profitable. Drugs fill receptors. What empties receptors (injury, PTSD) causes a desire for drugs. Drugs CAN'T cause addiction. Pass it on.

    • @bigjimtenbillion
      @bigjimtenbillion 10 днів тому +1

      Interesting.
      It's why we have opioid receptors and whatnot.
      Never considered this before
      Thank you

  • @TheSlackrguy
    @TheSlackrguy 13 днів тому +11

    It is always nice to see the hosts smiling, being light-hearted, & enjoying their interactions with each other.
    I like Gabbard the best but do not see that happening.

    • @cusz87
      @cusz87 12 днів тому

      Gabbard isn't going to kiss his but and worship him. He wants a crony that will do what he tells them.

  • @t-train7492
    @t-train7492 13 днів тому +5

    Vivek would be a great VP

    • @Rook98766
      @Rook98766 11 днів тому

      Yes but I think rubio

  • @jeffo8455
    @jeffo8455 11 днів тому +2

    The problem is that the agencies are writing their own regulations/laws. This should be reserved for congress, but it isnt necessarily happening now. The agencies fall under the executive branch, so it is the president that can stop and fix the ever expanding government.

  • @tourist1313
    @tourist1313 13 днів тому +23

    The TDS is so tiring

    • @RorkesDriftVC
      @RorkesDriftVC 11 днів тому

      Trump donors would head the FDA and other agencies. What could go wrong with big pharma heading the FDA.

    • @bigjimtenbillion
      @bigjimtenbillion 10 днів тому

      And old

    • @denvan3143
      @denvan3143 8 днів тому

      And predictable.

  • @LG-km8fw
    @LG-km8fw 12 днів тому +4

    Democrats trying to find they're new boogie man. Oh my project 2025. Big nothing buger!

  • @pfeilspitze
    @pfeilspitze 13 днів тому +12

    7:17 You're concerned about the power-grab of the executive branch, you say? Then you must be in favour of repealing Chevron, right, since it's about not deferring to the executive and instead making Congress write laws that clearly say what they want, so the President can't change them? Oh wait, no, you were just talking about how horrible that decision was last week 🙄

    • @pfeilspitze
      @pfeilspitze 13 днів тому +1

      Oh, good job Robby for making that point too.

    • @iMatti00
      @iMatti00 13 днів тому

      If you seriously don’t understand the distinction between those two, but I don’t really know what to tell you. In today’s world where are you right along that says insider trading is not allowed, and you give different examples. In today’s world there will be new Waze that they get around those rules that the agencies are able to react to immediately that stop insider trading instead of having to go through the Long process of having Congress do it. And would it be better for Congress to do it, yeah probably. But there was never any idea that the country would get this big and we would progress to such a amount. The founding fathers would never even contemplate everything we have today, and this is not just extra stuff that libertarians would say are not necessary, much of it they do believe as necessary. So even the most strict still believes that the government has some role to play. Yet you believe that you’re going to get Congress to go through and do everything they need every time it’s needed? Come on. That’s also like saying Congress needs to approve criminal charges against any drug dealer Or gang member that needs arrested. If every single small change in a business regulation needs to go through the entire process of Congress and getting signed by the president, then why shouldn’t every gang member get the same process from Congress before they are rested? Shirley that’s just as important to them. Obviously that’s not how the system is designed, but if you’re gonna say that Congress should have the ability to do it, then Shirley they should have the ability to do that. Because back in our founding days the arrests of people on federal charges were few and far between, so why didn’t they have congress vote on all of them too.

    • @pfeilspitze
      @pfeilspitze 13 днів тому +2

      @@iMatti00 You know it's judges that decide how to resolve ambiguity in things like the criminal statutes used to convict drug dealers, right? Exactly like they'll now do (again) for more things now that Chevron is dead.
      So your analogy doesn't work at all.
      (And your whole tangent about "some role to play" makes no sense since I was saying that Congress should write laws, not that there shouldn't be laws. I just want my air to be clean because the EPA clearly has the mandate to enforce that, not for the air quality to go up and down depending which president got elected.)

  • @user-uw4jw8lz3q
    @user-uw4jw8lz3q 13 днів тому +19

    OMG Jessica. "Trump only surrounds himself with people who agree with him." That's every president

    • @christophermanley3602
      @christophermanley3602 13 днів тому +3

      Not Lincoln

    • @ScottWylie-si8jx
      @ScottWylie-si8jx 13 днів тому +4

      Negative. A good leader listens AND occasionally concedes to opposite ideas. A dictator says, 'Agree with me or you won't have a job.'

    • @GamerX51
      @GamerX51 13 днів тому +1

      @@christophermanley3602 Yeah, and we all see what that got him in the end, don't we?

    • @christophermanley3602
      @christophermanley3602 13 днів тому +1

      @@GamerX51 On a $5 bill and sitting in a monument at the end of the National Mall

    • @GamerX51
      @GamerX51 13 днів тому

      @@christophermanley3602 No; it got him shot and caused his original plans for Southern Reconstruction to be derailed by the political opponents he put in his cabinet.

  • @terryritter7065
    @terryritter7065 11 днів тому +1

    Seriously, Jessica: you think the present administration didn't surround itself with people that think like them?

  • @kennacurry5019
    @kennacurry5019 12 днів тому +2

    I like Tulsi. I like Byron Donalds. I like Mark Robinson.
    Any program from a think tank will have some ridiculous ideas with also very good ones. Our government is too bloated with redundant agencies.

  • @timwhite5562
    @timwhite5562 13 днів тому +3

    The reality is that I don't think a second Trump presidency is going to be anything like the first one. I think part of that will be the this Trump isn't the same one from 7-8 years ago, nor is the county itself what it was.

    • @deeshires8721
      @deeshires8721 11 днів тому

      I think Trump is more aware as to how far the left will go

    • @robertmadison1205
      @robertmadison1205 8 днів тому

      One cannot step in the same river twice.

    • @timwhite5562
      @timwhite5562 8 днів тому

      @@robertmadison1205 what? Of course you can, I do it scores of times when fishing.

    • @robertmadison1205
      @robertmadison1205 8 днів тому

      @@timwhite5562 It is an old Greek saying, meaning approximately what you said. The river, society, keeps moving, the conditions have altered, so, the second steps enters a slightly or very different river (water, currents, fishes etc)

    • @timwhite5562
      @timwhite5562 8 днів тому

      @@robertmadison1205 got ya

  • @zubversivezigotto9731
    @zubversivezigotto9731 9 днів тому +1

    Over 900 pages that most of commentators never read .

  • @user-jt9ic3bi1s
    @user-jt9ic3bi1s 13 днів тому +2

    Trump doesn't know about Jeffrey Epstein either

  • @user-uw4jw8lz3q
    @user-uw4jw8lz3q 13 днів тому +8

    Yes, Jessica. Project 2025 would be the very first time that the executive branch has snatched power outside of the mandates of the Constitution...

    • @christophermanley3602
      @christophermanley3602 13 днів тому +6

      Give her a break. She was in daycare during the Patriot Act

    • @utah_koidragon7117
      @utah_koidragon7117 13 днів тому

      @@christophermanley3602 She was around during Biden's attempt to mandate vaccines, though.

    • @user-og4km2di8b
      @user-og4km2di8b 12 днів тому +1

      😂

    • @user-uw4jw8lz3q
      @user-uw4jw8lz3q 11 днів тому

      @@mikes4142 It's not just the signing statements. The United States hasn't been in a war since WWII. Now, the executive branch just decides to engage in war without bothering to have Congress declare it.

  • @user-pq9ji7kt4l
    @user-pq9ji7kt4l 8 днів тому +1

    Project 2025 has a lot of great ideas. Take what makes the most sense and ignore the rest.
    Pretty Simple.

  • @MichaelJeffers75
    @MichaelJeffers75 13 днів тому +1

    Even though P2025 was mostly based on policies Trump said he will use when elected, Jessica's keen eye still concluded that Trump will use some of the P2025 script. How insightful of her. Not a one of us would've guessed that Trump might do some of the things Trump said he will try to do.

  • @maxpowertastic
    @maxpowertastic 9 днів тому

    It can’t be a good sign for a campaign when their primary message is an attack on a questionably related think tank piece. 😂

  • @adriennelaf5083
    @adriennelaf5083 13 днів тому +2

    Thanks for having a discussion where you are actually discussing the topic. Maybe you could do a segment discussing some of the extreme parts of project 2025

    • @msimon6808
      @msimon6808 11 днів тому

      I like the part about ending the War On Drugs. Drugs fill receptors. What empties receptors (injury, PTSD) causes a desire for drugs. Drugs CAN'T cause addiction. Pass it on.

  • @adriennelaf5083
    @adriennelaf5083 13 днів тому +10

    Maybe we have other options. Real clear politics , harris x poll has some high poll numbers for RFK, mixed findings, but interesting.
    Im voting for Bobby jr. either way.

    • @universalsoldier2293
      @universalsoldier2293 13 днів тому +4

      He's on my list, too. Biden and Trump are not.

    • @christophermanley3602
      @christophermanley3602 13 днів тому +2

      Yep 👍🏻

    • @donkeybus
      @donkeybus 13 днів тому +2

      Hes clearly the best choice, the more they lie about them (eating a dog, anti semite, anti vax) the more hopeful I get.

    • @msimon6808
      @msimon6808 11 днів тому +1

      @@donkeybus Forcing an untried technology on the American public was a great advancement in medical science or fascism, depending.

  • @allonscanadiens
    @allonscanadiens 13 днів тому +2

    Vivek or Tulsi would be my pick, but I’ll settle for Vance.

    • @user-fw2dd2cy3c
      @user-fw2dd2cy3c 12 днів тому

      I guess, but he's already got Ohio--he leads by something crazy like 8 points there according to the RCP average. Politically speaking, it'd be better for the VP candidate to bring some votes with him. Rubio might bring more Hispanic voters, for example.

  • @mikeloves
    @mikeloves 12 днів тому +1

    I love the fearmongering. They hate him so much theyre willing to believe any conspiracy theory yet call everyone else crazy. 😂😂😂

  • @Toke-YT
    @Toke-YT 13 днів тому +2

    15 mins posted, 60 views. Fell off guys

  • @sallybags9090
    @sallybags9090 13 днів тому +13

    Every President surrounds himself with people who agrees with his policies or ideology lol. That was a pretty desperate and dumb thing to say.

    • @karldeweese8501
      @karldeweese8501 13 днів тому +2

      The left replaced traditional religion with a secular faith based on the ideology that informed Lysenko a century ago and religion can be a a strong motivator.

    • @christophermanley3602
      @christophermanley3602 13 днів тому +2

      Lincoln and Kennedy didn’t. See where that got them.

    • @davids.2703
      @davids.2703 13 днів тому +2

      That's not the same as only hiring yes men. We already know that it doesn't matter how conservative you are, if you criticize Trump at all he calls you an unloyal RINO.

    • @iMatti00
      @iMatti00 13 днів тому +2

      Wait… You dont understand who we are talking about. Presidents have “political appointees” that they are Are able to surround themselves with an fire at will. That is not a problem. We are talking about the everyday people, the scientists, the workers who process paperwork, etc. The supervisors are political appointees and there’s about 4000 of them that run the federal government, project 2025 says that actually the every day workers that are accountable to the supervisors can be fired at will. That is never how it’s been. In fact legislation was written to not allow that because in the past you had a president come in and only put people who agreed with them and who are willing to do their bidding no matter what. So rather than having career educated people who can ADVISE the policy makers (A.k.a. the political appointees) how to process the information, they just awarded loyalists and donors with random jobs. Now in today’s world donors are not gonna want your employee jobs, but you still have the other problems with wiping out the working class experts.

    • @bigjimtenbillion
      @bigjimtenbillion 10 днів тому

      So what do you do when the "expert" is not an expert, just an obedient lackey from an administration long gone? Pushing ideologies that don't fit with the reality on the ground? You have to be stuck with the disobedient lackey impeding progress. Someone who wants ever expanding programs cause that's all we have had for the past 60+ years? More and more government, more and more government inefficiency?
      More and more debt.
      Clearly the status quo isn't working and 35 trillion validates my points.
      The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
      Every day on here I hear know nothing's bxtching about president Trump...well guess what
      If Obama did his job instead of enrichment of himself and his lackeys Trump never shows up, same thing to the never trumpers) RINOs that have defiled the Republican name...if Bush did what he was supposed to there would be no trump
      Sure he's uncouth, combative and confrontational
      But that's exactly what the country needs right now.
      No more mealy mouth promises to get elected then do nothing but kick the can down the road
      We are at the precipice for this country it's either Trump and turn it around or the Dems and off the cliff into oblivion and the dustbin of history another failed fallen empire

  • @danielhanlon8431
    @danielhanlon8431 13 днів тому +1

    Just go down to the store and get some cream and enjoy.

  • @shawnarthur1516
    @shawnarthur1516 9 днів тому

    Is the self-proclaimed "Libertarian" just argue for "more laws"?!

  • @dannysullivan3951
    @dannysullivan3951 6 днів тому

    He can’t read, but someone told him about and he said ’you got it’.

  • @kabaduck
    @kabaduck 13 днів тому +6

    Rubio is invested in the FBI and the bureaucracy of the US government, JD Vance looks like he has a heart condition but other than that seems like a really good guy, and North Dakota Gov acts like a confidential FBI informant

    • @iMatti00
      @iMatti00 13 днів тому

      What about JD saying that he thinks Trump is Americas World War II guy, I can’t say the word but I think you might know what I mean. But I said now he has changed his mind? Could it be because he’s after power? Or could it be because he has decided that that wouldn’t be such a bad thing, as long as he’s on the right side of the boss? But of course I have no doubt that he’ll tonight he said it, it could be on video and he would say it was fake.

    • @iMatti00
      @iMatti00 13 днів тому +1

      I love how a segment of society believes they have something of value to add but they are really just completely inconsistent (there is an H word for that too) because if the current administration did what was being planned, they would be screaming about how this isn’t an attack on all of America and many other things I can’t see in UA-cam without having my comment be made invisible.

    • @msimon6808
      @msimon6808 11 днів тому

      @@iMatti00 H - preparation H

  • @Humanity99998
    @Humanity99998 9 днів тому

    Craps… Guilty by Association is the only way that they can attract Trump 🤔🤮

  • @geraldcross5755
    @geraldcross5755 12 днів тому

    They cut full answer the man said he sent it to Joe also

  • @user-og4km2di8b
    @user-og4km2di8b 12 днів тому

    What fear mongering and it’s baseless. If this happens then this will happen is a great example of the cognitive distortion of awfulizing and future predicting that which is not even reality and then making fear based short sighted decisions and jumping to erroneous conclusions and making assumptive leaps that have no basis in fact.

  • @jameskuhn4541
    @jameskuhn4541 11 днів тому

    I thought Obama had something similar that he instituted. But it also seems here lately , can't believe anything regardless of of who's taking

  • @jones6119
    @jones6119 11 днів тому

    My picks were Vivek or Tulsi. Hope they will play a prominent role.

  • @blick5815
    @blick5815 13 днів тому

    Jessica does so well but then blatantly declares that she is willing to be completely biased and discard any objectivity to get what she wants…….

  • @philg4116
    @philg4116 13 днів тому

    Burgum is too gnarly looking, but that does help him fade into the woodwork wherever it's naturally finished instead of being smoothly painted.

  • @cusz87
    @cusz87 12 днів тому

    Peoject 2025 is terrible. I'm right leaning but our elected leaders need to be coming up with pilicies and not foundations whether liberal or conservative. We are not electing the Heritage Foundation.

    • @user-og4km2di8b
      @user-og4km2di8b 12 днів тому

      Did you read it? I have not but to actually comment and have an intelligent opinion one must read it. I will do so. Will you?

  • @ANNAOBAGS
    @ANNAOBAGS 13 днів тому +3

    I think Vance would be able to assist Trump in finding the right people for cabinet appointments, unlike his previous administration.

  • @marygarati720
    @marygarati720 11 днів тому

    I didn't pay attention who this female person is on this video, but for her to state that she would want a VP pick that would Not help Trump be successful shows who and what she really is. I give her NO credibility at all.

  • @charlesdavis7461
    @charlesdavis7461 11 днів тому

    Have you told Trump????

  • @KishoriSah-rg3ir
    @KishoriSah-rg3ir 13 днів тому +1

    Sleepy joeee 😂😂😂😂😂 even don't walk. How he runs the country right now 😂😂😂😂

  • @frankieclayton9303
    @frankieclayton9303 10 днів тому

    He knows!

  • @modernjosephus356
    @modernjosephus356 13 днів тому

    As someone who like Project 2025 I think it's laughable Trump would implement half of it. A lot of it is too conservative even for MAGA.

  • @KiNETiKpoWerZ
    @KiNETiKpoWerZ 13 днів тому

    Sounds like a psyop to me

  • @andrewfranklin9034
    @andrewfranklin9034 11 днів тому

    Why do they have the cnn Joe rogan greenish yellow filter on Jess? Has she been using ivermectin?

  • @johnnyappleseed79
    @johnnyappleseed79 10 днів тому

    Rubio has the best chance in 2028.

  • @user-uf2pd1cz1z
    @user-uf2pd1cz1z 9 днів тому

    How about Project Late Term Abortion ?

  • @georgemckeon6710
    @georgemckeon6710 9 днів тому

    Democrats: When you don’t like what’s being said, change the conversation.

  • @bigwill8145
    @bigwill8145 8 днів тому

    I'll be very disappointed in Trump if he picks Rubio.

  • @esthermarygold-lowe4403
    @esthermarygold-lowe4403 13 днів тому +4

    I honestly dont think trump would enact the parts that would harm individual rights that have been in civil liberties and basic human rights.

    • @lileos2837
      @lileos2837 13 днів тому

      it is in his platform. these people who are the "radical left" are people with rights too. read the document. if access to health care and education are basic human rights then you are wrong. if rights in the constitution, especially amendment 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 14 are civil liberties, then Trump has explicitly undermined each one in his rallies and his platform. For example, immunity for police? That wipes out half of them right there.

    • @msimon6808
      @msimon6808 11 днів тому

      @@lileos2837 There is no Drug Prohibition Amendment. The Feds lack Jurisdiction. - Trump has reasons, IMO.

    • @msimon6808
      @msimon6808 11 днів тому

      Joe "punish Blacks 100 Times More" Biden has been an outstanding proponent of Civil Liberties and human rights. He is a proud originator of Systemic Racism.

  • @AceB1ue
    @AceB1ue 8 днів тому

    Tulsi VP calling it now

  • @jljmem
    @jljmem 12 днів тому

    Project 2025 sounds like Russia Russia Russia

  • @RodGustavson
    @RodGustavson 13 днів тому

    It’s cute how Robby believes trump when he says his retribution will be his “success”. At this point, taking anything he says at face value is ludicrous.
    Let’s be clear. trump believes he will succeed by taking retribution against his political enemies. He doesn’t define it if the middle wor working class are better off. He defines it if HE is personally successful. That could mean forcing government to spend money at his resorts as he did last time. It could mean improving his golf swing. It could mean having all charges dropped and pardoning his allies.
    Nothing indicates it means better health care, reformed immigration, a fairer tax system, or better incomes.

  • @anomad6314
    @anomad6314 6 днів тому

    No one wants Rubio

  • @jimleonardson4268
    @jimleonardson4268 13 днів тому

    @3:50 "A permanent bureaucratic class" are crafting our policies. Really? Is the NRA, ALEC or The Heritage Foundation what you mean?

    • @ericward284
      @ericward284 13 днів тому

      😂😂😂 right lol pike let's make a conservative think tank make policy then, that'll work

  • @adriennelaf5083
    @adriennelaf5083 13 днів тому +4

    And between Biden and this, that is why Im voting for RFK jr.

    • @christopherwalch6291
      @christopherwalch6291 13 днів тому

      Trump is notorious for not listening to his advisors. This is just fear mongering about Trump as usual!

  • @christineking8996
    @christineking8996 7 днів тому

    Vance is the better man

  • @timwhite5562
    @timwhite5562 13 днів тому

    "execute order 66."
    - shadowy Heritage foundation figure speaking to no one in particular.

  • @philg4116
    @philg4116 13 днів тому

    Project 2025: Replace all registered democratic postal workers with registered republican postal workers and have them crash their delivery vehicles then shut down the postal service.

    • @bigjimtenbillion
      @bigjimtenbillion 10 днів тому

      I'm sure it really said that.
      I'm guessing it claims to cancel any and all regulations put in place for clean air too, huh?
      Does it also hang blacks?
      What other lies are you going to spew from your firehose of lies 😂😂😂

    • @philg4116
      @philg4116 10 днів тому

      @@bigjimtenbillion Maybe all of the above. I haven't read the whole thing really. I'm stuck on the part about recastrating castrati for conversion therapy, terrified of what comes next.

  • @throughhellback3931
    @throughhellback3931 13 днів тому

    well let's just hope TRUMP doesn't sell out to PROJECT 2025 if he wins....

  • @weverleywagstaffe8490
    @weverleywagstaffe8490 12 днів тому

    wat is this lady talking about???? they're always AFRAID of wat trump cud do....WAT ABOT WAT THEY ARE DOING NOWWWWWWWW....geeze

  • @user-ou6dn5eu3i
    @user-ou6dn5eu3i 12 днів тому

    Three vampires wants to be vice president for mega criminal gangster.

  • @esthermarygold-lowe4403
    @esthermarygold-lowe4403 13 днів тому

    Mandate for leadership aka project 2025 was 1st set up and given to regan in 1980

    • @TheVeritas2100
      @TheVeritas2100 13 днів тому

      then I would be PERFECT for The Trumpster ! 🙂

  • @raiconlan1
    @raiconlan1 10 днів тому +1

    vivek 4 vp

  • @Xt1000
    @Xt1000 11 днів тому

    Never heard of project 2025. Sounds just like the Dem. Party. Like minded people in the same group. You guys are trying to make it sound nefarious but its literally the party system.

  • @markdavis7853
    @markdavis7853 13 днів тому

    If any of these 3 are chosen trump eill loose

    • @donaldducklas4155
      @donaldducklas4155 13 днів тому

      Yeah I don’t think so. It is over. They can’t swap Biden and they have already lost. It will only get worse for them from here.

  • @Rook98766
    @Rook98766 11 днів тому

    Rubio

  • @maryjaneblount7257
    @maryjaneblount7257 7 днів тому

    We're a REPUBIC NOT A DEMOCRACY, CAN YOU AT LEAST GET THAT RIGHT!!!

  • @NihilSineDeo09
    @NihilSineDeo09 13 днів тому +5

    Rubio would be a good VP pick from those 3. He has been a competent senator who, since 2017, has reached across the aisle while remaining true to conservative agenda. He is also Hispanic and relatively young, so he can be a great 2028 POTUS candidate. Unlike JD Vance who is from a swing state, the re-election of a conservative senator in FL should pose little issue.

  • @LadyArete
    @LadyArete 13 днів тому +2

    Robby is spot on with this segment. Rubio would be great.

  • @Ryancaresaboutyou
    @Ryancaresaboutyou 13 днів тому +6

    LIES!
    VOTE RFK Jr. 2024!!!
    🇺🇸🫡🍀 Enough is enough!

    • @jveebklyn1644
      @jveebklyn1644 13 днів тому

      Unfortunately, the MSM isn't going to cover RFK Jr. unless it's to trash him. He's doing well among people who get information from alternative sources, but that's not enough to win.
      Unfortunately, the Vanity Fair article and subsequent MSM coverage of it did some damage.

  • @Dblue-rhino
    @Dblue-rhino 6 днів тому

    I like Ulysses S Grant

  • @SuperMissDaisey
    @SuperMissDaisey 13 днів тому

    JD Vance I have been following you since the Tim Ryan run, why are you Not going on Mark Levin program Why I follow The Great One, he keeps Americans straight,you’re going to shoot yourself in the foot disrespecting Mark Levin, I do care for Rubio,you on the other hand have made me Proud from day one of no more Tim Ryan.
    President Trump Highly respects MARK LEVIN July 8 podcast
    mark levin told his audience you JD you ignore hid program , I shocked and disappointed. Mark has huge following

  • @stevenshanks8221
    @stevenshanks8221 13 днів тому +3

    He should choose Byron Donalds.

    • @christophermanley3602
      @christophermanley3602 13 днів тому +2

      Just because the yard signs would say “Trump Donalds”

    • @stevenshanks8221
      @stevenshanks8221 13 днів тому +2

      @@christophermanley3602 , that’s actually funny

  • @hgservices5572
    @hgservices5572 8 днів тому

    Robbie is so out of touch with Maga , this podcast has a blind spot . You need to add two more talking heads on each side of the isle

  • @WinstonBartholomewIII
    @WinstonBartholomewIII 13 днів тому +2

    How can he say he disagrees with things he said he never read or knows about?

    • @wesleycorlynda8371
      @wesleycorlynda8371 13 днів тому +3

      You don’t read well. He says what he HEARD….

    • @ShamrockShanrock-ip5tx
      @ShamrockShanrock-ip5tx 13 днів тому +1

      HE NEVER SAID HE READ IT. BY THE HYSTERIA AROUND P2025 HE OBVIOUSLY LOOKED INTO IT -DUH.. & HE DISAVOWED IT. BE HAPPY HE DOESN'T ENDORSE P25 INSTEAD OF GETTING CONSPIRATORIAL ABOUT IT.

  • @littlemisstricky
    @littlemisstricky 13 днів тому

    Boring without Brie

  • @jeffjohnson2792
    @jeffjohnson2792 12 днів тому

    What happened to the loony left lady that used to make Robby roll his eyes? I miss his reactions to her silly points of view. Brianna was it?

  • @Realcjs
    @Realcjs 13 днів тому +8

    There’s nothing wrong with project 2025

    • @davids.2703
      @davids.2703 13 днів тому +6

      Until you actually look at what they want

    • @jefferydraper4019
      @jefferydraper4019 13 днів тому

      @@davids.2703 No, until you look at it through the lefts warped mind.

    • @Realcjs
      @Realcjs 13 днів тому +2

      @@davids.2703 I disagree.

    • @jefferydraper4019
      @jefferydraper4019 13 днів тому

      There really isnt and some would be pretty smart for the country and I hope he takes a look at those ideas after being elected and incorporates the best into his plans.
      Of course the left will try and go to the extreme pointing out how THEIR OWN fanatics would implement them.

    • @paulwheeldreyer7127
      @paulwheeldreyer7127 13 днів тому +4

      @@davids.2703 I've read it, it's not extreme. Replacing bureaucrats who actively work against the elected President is not extreme.

  • @johndearborn5360
    @johndearborn5360 13 днів тому +3

    Trump/gabbard 2024

  • @truthbtold7997
    @truthbtold7997 13 днів тому +7

    TRUMP/VIVEK or TRUMP/DESANTIS

  • @jamesterrance
    @jamesterrance 13 днів тому +3

    Jessica is right. All Trump wants is loyalty. He's not interested in being challenged. I suppose most leaders want that.

  • @LC-vw9kv
    @LC-vw9kv 13 днів тому

    This just shows how desperate the Democrats are....😂😂😂 cant win a straight up fight lol

  • @causeandefect8252
    @causeandefect8252 13 днів тому +1

    His VP pick is probably Kevin Roberts if he knows what's good for him!

  • @deadgolfer6345
    @deadgolfer6345 13 днів тому +1

    What's wrong with Project 2025? People keep talking about it like I'm supposed to be scared of it.

    • @iMatti00
      @iMatti00 13 днів тому

      I love how a segment of society believes they have something of value to add but they are really just hypocritical because if the current administration did what was being planned, they would be screaming about how this isn’t an attack on all of America and many other things I can’t see in UA-cam without having my comment be made invisible.b

  • @johnkritikos3846
    @johnkritikos3846 12 днів тому

    Show has gone downhill

  • @christineking8996
    @christineking8996 7 днів тому

    You guys are such hypocrites

  • @bradleymaravalli2851
    @bradleymaravalli2851 13 днів тому +1

    Why wouldn't Trump pick another "Mike Pence" type of figure in Doug Burgum? Worked well before.

    • @TheVeritas2100
      @TheVeritas2100 13 днів тому

      THE BEST COMMENT ON THIS TOPIC ! 🙂

  • @christianwestling2019
    @christianwestling2019 13 днів тому

    Please have this duo on every time

  • @Juan-tb2ww
    @Juan-tb2ww 13 днів тому +2

    So glad that other angry woman is gone.

  • @utah_koidragon7117
    @utah_koidragon7117 13 днів тому +1

    The 2025 plan would be a good start.

  • @TrentSLucas
    @TrentSLucas 13 днів тому +1

    I still think Trump should pick Tim Scott for his VP. Of course, I thought he should have picked Ben Carson back in 2016.

  • @tyronearnold6692
    @tyronearnold6692 13 днів тому +1

    Tim Scott for the win!