When are you "Established" on an Instrument Approach | Instrument Approach Clearances | 91.175

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 51

  • @Doornail23
    @Doornail23 Рік тому +69

    Another great video! As of a few hours ago I passed my instrument check ride and can say without a doubt your UA-cam videos helped so much!

    • @MuffinCHeeler
      @MuffinCHeeler Рік тому +1

      Congrats.

    • @PaulthePilot55
      @PaulthePilot55 Рік тому

      Nice! I’m just now starting my instrument training. What was the hardest part for you?

    • @masonmccall6591
      @masonmccall6591 Рік тому +2

      @@PaulthePilot55I’m about 3/4 of the way done with my training. When I was getting started, the hardest part was learning to get accustomed how to fly without looking outside and looking only at instruments.

    • @abbieamavi
      @abbieamavi Рік тому +1

      congrats!! Instrument is a major deal!!

    • @rickseeman5679
      @rickseeman5679 Рік тому

      Instrument is the toughest

  • @mm10983
    @mm10983 Рік тому +29

    Great video as always ! As an CFII I’m always making sure my students understand what “established”means. As you mentioned the FAA doesn’t provide clear guidance. However the military does. As a former F-15E WSO and instructor navigator we taught that established on a localizer is when the CDI comes off the wall just as you noted. I also make sure to include what established on a VOR means since they are much less sensitive and descending too soon can get you in trouble. We teach that establish on a VOR is 1/2 scale deflection of the CDI.

  • @firepilot109
    @firepilot109 Рік тому +13

    Guys if you haven't signed up for this course you need too! I just passed my Instrument checkride and these videos were huge part of it! Great videos! Now onto commercial! Thanks again!

    • @vfx7t
      @vfx7t Рік тому

      You, America; me, cursed Africa 🤣🤣🤣

    • @arctain1
      @arctain1 Місяць тому

      Agreed.. this course was essential for my passing - and more importantly, understanding - IFR ops. It’s a great course!

  • @abbieamavi
    @abbieamavi Рік тому +2

    yes! this is a very common issue I see students forgetting, and now that I'm a CFI, I'm trying to learn how to describe it to them so that it "sticks". thanks for this quick tip, great video :)

  • @valehedgehog996
    @valehedgehog996 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for the top notch knowledge that you provides, I am now a CPL and IR holder.

  • @gonetoearth2588
    @gonetoearth2588 Рік тому +2

    Awesome video. One point I would make in very busy workload situations is in this example you gave one should not necessarily be inclined to "dive" down to 5000 at WUGAG as its not a mandatory altitude. There is a chance for a high rate of decent that would have to be remedied when the GS comes alive. Staying a bit higher is safer and you will pickup the GS INSIDE WUGAG as you will be below GS.....IMHO controllers in busy Class B airspaces are quite pro to help you out as you predictably intercept an ILS...Keep the awesome vids coming!!!

  • @DylanCannon
    @DylanCannon Рік тому +1

    Great work Dan. I wouldn’t have passed my CFII without you.

  • @Saml01
    @Saml01 Рік тому +6

    Now to make sure the DPE's are aware of the definition of established and all will be peachy. Otherwise, for the check ride I'll just descend when the needle is centered.

  • @stuartcrutchfield8880
    @stuartcrutchfield8880 Рік тому +1

    As always a very helpful video! You are great at explaining flying concepts. I have purchased some of your courses and they are also very helpful!

  • @ervinghernandez2632
    @ervinghernandez2632 Рік тому +2

    ¡Gracias!

  • @mytech6779
    @mytech6779 7 місяців тому

    If flying a GPS RNAV and you have correctly selected gps on the CDI, the nac unit will automatically adjust the CDI scale to the +-1NM requirment and autmatically sequence to the appropriate leg, only with both the leg active and within max scale will you be established. I suppose you could manually select the leg before getting there, like maybe if you are being vectored, in which case when the needle is alive then you are within the required lateral navigation performance for that leg because of the auto scaling. (Autoscaling is required for device certification and you can only manally set a tighter scale than what it would otherwise auto select.)

  • @Flanksss
    @Flanksss Рік тому

    I appreciate these videos a lot man, thank you

  • @jim_ratliff
    @jim_ratliff Рік тому +3

    “The FAA definition of established on course requires the aircraft to be established on the route centerline.” FAA Instrument Procedures Handbook, Page 4-54, in the right hand column.

    • @flightinsight9111
      @flightinsight9111  Рік тому +6

      Thanks! We could have included that but defining “established” by using the word “established” adds confusion. We fell back on the language that’s more regulatory in nature in the video.

    • @AV4Life
      @AV4Life 2 місяці тому

      This is what I always intuitively thought “established” meant

  • @domaguayo7819
    @domaguayo7819 3 місяці тому

    On this very subject check out TWA flight 514 on 12/1/74. Misunderstanding about when to descend to final approach altitude. Confusion can be deadly. I had a similar clearance in the 70s while flying a Cessna 402 at night in upstate N.Y. Not sure how the altitude should be handled, I decided to arrive over the airport and then start my descent for the approach. Clearances back then weren’t as cut and dry as they are today. If you’re uncertain about the approach don’t be shy about asking when exactly to start down.

  • @nealhere
    @nealhere 10 місяців тому +1

    Doesn’t the procedure turn go opposite the arrow not the way you showed it? Love your videos all the time.

  • @jakew9887
    @jakew9887 Рік тому

    Great presentation. Thanks

  • @oleksandrshevela7830
    @oleksandrshevela7830 Рік тому +3

    Thanks!
    Does term “establish” apply to feeder routes?
    When can we descend to MEA feeder route?

    • @flightinsight9111
      @flightinsight9111  Рік тому +2

      yes, we can apply this concept to any route, whether on an instrument approach segment, feeder route, en route airway, or STAR.

    • @marklindsey1995
      @marklindsey1995 3 місяці тому

      @@flightinsight9111 Pg 4-42 of the Instrument Procedures Handbook states "Feeder Routes, also referred to as approach transitions, technically are not considered approach segments"
      If I am on a feeder route, I am not technically established on an approach segment. 91.175(i) states when I am on an unpublished route or being vectored, I can descend when established on a segment of a published route or instrument approach procedure..... What happens when my flight plan is filed from the enroute to a feeder and then IAF? I am on a published route and not being vectored. If my last assigned altitude is higher than the feeder route, and I am cleared for the approach, I do not believe I am authorized to descend until passing the IAF. Is this in error?

  • @_carminati_
    @_carminati_ 3 місяці тому

    Great video. How would a G1000 handle the procedure in a situation where you were coming in from sugar loaf? Does it automatically add the outbound leg and procedure turn?

  • @diaryrecorded5524
    @diaryrecorded5524 Рік тому

    cool so as I understand then there are 2 definitions... half scale and when the need comes alive? THANK YOU!

  • @jeremiahstarke4516
    @jeremiahstarke4516 Рік тому +4

    This video is how I busted my checkride which was descending before needle was centered on a lpv.

    • @kdeleon7047
      @kdeleon7047 Рік тому

      Sorry to hear. Just curious, what exactly did the DPE say?

    • @freepilot7732
      @freepilot7732 7 місяців тому +3

      He should not have busted.

  • @FredericWuerth
    @FredericWuerth Рік тому +1

    Does this also apply to being "established" in holds? Much like this video, I have heard many different answers to that question...

    • @OMARRIOO
      @OMARRIOO Рік тому

      Established in a hold is something you report usually after your first inbound to outbound turn.

  • @AirspeedisLife
    @AirspeedisLife 10 місяців тому

    does the ACS standard only apply to checkrides because it is like a grading sheet the examiner goes by on a checkride only?

  • @austinfick6241
    @austinfick6241 10 місяців тому

    AIM calls for .3 nm on approach not 1nm at the end there just a heads up. Great video

    • @user-wl6bw3jl4n
      @user-wl6bw3jl4n 8 місяців тому

      Is it 1 nm from initial approach to 0.3 nm for final approach, or 0.3 nm the entire approach?

  • @Brian-my1qi
    @Brian-my1qi Рік тому

    If the LOC is 4 times more sensitive than a VOR, does that mean 2.5 dots on the CDI is full scale deflection?

    • @marklindsey1995
      @marklindsey1995 3 місяці тому

      No. Full deflection is to the wall. Full scale deflection of a VOR is 12 degrees or more (each dot is 2 degrees. The last dot is 10 degrees.). Full scale deflection of a LOC is 2.5 degrees (each dot is 0.5 degrees).

  • @bullseyes1983
    @bullseyes1983 Рік тому +3

    I'm just a VFR pilot, but always assumed that "established" means when the needle comes alive, or de LOC is engaged. It seems like I can keep doing it this way in the sim xD

  • @savagecub
    @savagecub 10 місяців тому +4

    CDI ?.......CDI ? Do current instrument students even know what that is ?

  • @therealm27
    @therealm27 10 місяців тому

    One nit picky point. When you say you're about 14 miles out I think the rule of 60 would say you're just inside 1/4 mile. So I think you'd be less than 1300 feet. I enjoyed the explanation you gave and research into ICAO.

  • @vfx7t
    @vfx7t Рік тому +4

    In the past, my dream was to become a pilot, but now, my only wish is to acquire a powerful enough computer to fully appreciate the magnificence of FS2020. Given the high cost of this computer equipment, I still content myself with flying on FSX and Xplane 11. ;D

    • @SerenityMusicOasis
      @SerenityMusicOasis Рік тому +4

      At least in MSFS you don't need to become an aeronautical lawyer to enjoy the skies! 😅

    • @vfx7t
      @vfx7t Рік тому

      @@SerenityMusicOasis You know, I've had a great passion for flight simulators for 34 years. I've always managed to stay up to date since the simulator's creation on Amstrad in 1988, up until FSX. However, this time with FS2020, I was caught off guard. I couldn't keep up due to the high cost of its required configuration. Thank you ;))

    • @seattleboatguy
      @seattleboatguy Рік тому

      @Jon Dow : Interestingly enough, as I was watching this video, I was thinking "man, you're got to be a lawyer to remember all this stuff". Pilots sure have to cram a lot of regs into their brain.

    • @firepilot109
      @firepilot109 Рік тому +3

      For price of about 3 flight lessons you can by a super nice gaming computer! I just passed my Instrument rating and now I sit on edge of taxiway with sign saying I will wash their planes for AVGAS money!!! lol FS2020 is awesome and it helps me with all my ratings and when we fly to new locations I will jump on there and fly it 1st .

    • @theMerzavets
      @theMerzavets Рік тому

      I bought XBOX Series X exclusively for MS FS 2020. It is highly recommended to use joystick and any cheap USB keyboard and mouse.
      There are some limitations in comparison with PC version, but look: for just $500 you get great peace of hardware. Looks like PC with the same perf score will cost you two or even three times more.

  • @cholubaz
    @cholubaz 9 місяців тому

    I was just asking this question the other day