Federal vs State Laws HD
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- Discussion on the "Federal vs. State Laws" with:
* Jack Beerman - Harry Elwood Warren Scholar and Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
* Stewart Harris - Professor of Law, Appalachian School of Law
* Michael N. Herring - Commonwealth Attorney, City of Richmond
* David Rossman - Director of Clinical Programs in Criminal Law and Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
* Ronald S. Sullivan, Jr. - Director of the Criminal Justice Institute, Harvard Law School
Produced as part of the "Constitutional Foundations for Law Enforcement" online course by the Robert H. Smith Center for the Constitution at James Madison's Montpelier. For more information, please go to montpelier.org/courses
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #1 НАЧАЛО ПУТЕШЕСТВИЯ [Новый сезон] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/380Q7gLWGvk/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm only watching this for schoolwork 😗
GOD bless you Mr Smith
So...someone explain to me how the 2nd Ammendment says shall not be infringed yet laws are continually being passed infringing upon the arms that the people can possess? Even the prevention of certain types of knives or automatic weapons by the Federal government. Does it all fall on how some judge wants to interpret the law?
Partly because the BIG government advocate Alexander Hamilton's interpretation of the "necessary and proper" clause of Article I, sec 8 of the Const.
Tyranny. Dictatorship Biden destroying our country
@@richardzellersthank you for that
Good Morning and thank you
Thank you!
So they can't they be more restrictive on immigration enforcement?
How to get results from higher courts is the issue I am having.
Jackie; you are basically out of luck. Even if you are a millionaire, and can hire excellent lawyers and create compelling argu ments for your position, the political views of members of the relevant court could mean that they simply refuse to hear the case. This is apparently ok for them to do. Fu*"in lawyers!!!
Shouldn’t there just be a singular overarching law like federal laws instead of individual state laws ?
at our land fill it is stealing to something let's say someone takes a lap top out of e waste bin it sold new for enough to be a felony and that person boards a airplane and reports it stolen from his checked luggage and it is found a tsa screenr stole it are both thefts the same or is federal more serious
I'm not in a situation but just wondering how the law is and would view it thanks
James Patterson ?
What are the consequences for states directly violating the Constitution. Virginia
Slongger, There is no meaningful way to "punish" the United States or a State. Officers of the federal government who fail to perform their duties as required by the Constitution may be impeached and removed from office upon conviction
Exactly... when a state law such as mandatory quarantine or told to stay inside can clash with federal law and freedom.
Michigan's stay-at-home its order was ruled constitutional
@@brandonzender5839yet it never was ....constitutional
you guys contradicted yourself. you said if state and federal contradict, then federal law wins, this means that federal minimum wage would WIN over state laws, which is not the case. those 2 things directly contradict each other and state law is supreme. or atleast that's how it is across the usa.
article 6 is talking about how constitution is above all law makers and federal and state law. it's above everything including the president. all the law makers need to pass laws that are constitutional. state or federal laws can't contradict the constitution. federal law and constitutional law are NOT the same. the constitution is above federal law, this is article 6 talking about.
why are states passing laws that violate federal laws? like Roe vs wade?
Row VS. Wade was a finding in the Supreme Court. In the judiciary, not the legislative branch that makes laws. The big mistake was leaving the right to abortion as an interpretation of law and not made an amendment to the constitution.
Cool
In America it is a crime to be a leaper, fun-gal disease is a crime.
In addition there are local county and city rules and regulations which have the force of law. So states, counties and cities can still create whatever they can get away with. This means you can be an honest law abiding citizen in your city, and be a felon in your county. You can also be an honest, law abiding citizen in your state and a felon in the state next door.
Finally, a state resident cannot just invoke his Federal rights. You have to go to court, where various courts simply refuse to even hear your case!!! So, we are citizens of the U.S. and only pawns of the state government where you live. Minority opinions are totally disregarded and your only option is to move to a state where you like the state/ local laws better. You might have to give up your job, home or family to do so, but YOUR life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness are secondary to the tyranny of the majority.
This country's a mess...
After watching this you realize you don't have to be an attorney to figure out you don't have to be attorney to know that Federal Laws do NOT trump state law if the original context of constitution did not delegate certain powers to the Federal Government and reserved to the states or the people . The US Constitution is the Law of the Land and the first 10 amendments are annumerated therefore in-alienable whether you burn the constitution or not. Only time when Federal Law trumps state law and when you're willing to roll over and take up the ass.
So confusing 😂 logic dictate conflicts will arise when therea are two sovereign at the same time & place
It doesn't apply to the man and woman of God they are not our god giving Rights that's why I stay in the privete side and stay away from the public side of life
helpful video but these guys are NERDS
If those guys weren’t “nerds”, then the video wouldn’t have been helpful.