Why does Starfield Get So Much Hate?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 жов 2024
- Today, we're going to delve into the reasons why there's so much doubt surrounding Starfield, a game that hasn't even hit the shelves yet. People seem to believe it's going to be a disaster, and we're here to break down some possible reasons why this might be so and see if they actually make sense. Let’s blast and explore this new Bethesda universe!
Let me know in the comments below:
Are you skeptical or excited about Starfield? Let us know in the comments below.
Subscribe for more RPG and Open-world Games Content: bit.ly/Jointhe...
Starfield is the first new universe in 25 years from Bethesda Game Studios, the award-winning creators of The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim and Fallout 4. In this next generation role-playing game set amongst the stars, create any character you want and explore with unparalleled freedom as you embark on an epic journey to answer humanity’s greatest mystery.
The year is 2330. Humanity has ventured beyond our solar system, settling new planets, and living as a spacefaring people. From humble beginnings as a space miner, you will join Constellation - the last group of space explorers seeking rare artifacts throughout the galaxy - and navigate the vast expanse of the Settled Systems in Bethesda Game Studios’ biggest and most ambitious game.
Watch more Open World/RPG Content:
Hogwarts Legacy: bit.ly/Hogwart...
Biomutant: bit.ly/Biomuta...
Stop By and say Hi on my Socials:
youtube: / kaletherelentless
twitter: bit.ly/Kalethe...
tiktok: / kaletherelentless
Starfield has been making waves in the gaming community, with fans eagerly anticipating its release. With Starfield News constantly popping up, rumors and leaks have been circulating about the game's features and release date. Bethesda, the developer behind the game, has revealed some exciting details about Starfield Gameplay, including weapons, space suits, outposts, crafting, character creation, lore, quests, spaceships, ship building, traits, skills, backgrounds, economy, research, planets, factions, and space combat. As the Starfield Launch draws nearer, fans have been eagerly devouring every Starfield Update and news update, hoping for a Starfield Release Date reveal. Some leaks have surfaced claiming to have insider information about the game's release date and other info. Bethesda has remained tight-lipped about such rumors and has promised a huge reveal event for Starfield. Fans are eagerly anticipating this event and wondering just how huge the game will be. With so much hype and speculation surrounding Starfield, it's no wonder gamers are curious about the game's size and scope. What can Starfield learn from the disastrous launch of Redfall? Bethesda needs to address the problems from Redfall so Starfield does not suffer from the same fight.
This video is similar to Light, Starfield Signal and DamarcoDude in some parts.
BGM Music: Epidemic Sounds
#starfield #starfieldnews #starfieldgameplay - Ігри
Are you skeptical or excited about Starfield? Let us know in the comments below.
Instead of speculating why people feel this way why not simply ask them? You just made up reasons like you are trying to understand the mind of a duck. Maybe everyone is right to be skeptical when their last releases have been disasters and have also lied numerous times even with the releases that were good.
The greatest reason why everyone hates starfield is because they're Sony ponies
"There are many theories"
Really? So nothing to do with what people actually SAY they're concerned about when they comment negatively about it, Just make up strawmen as to why they're posting negatively rather than positively.
This is the pathetic and delusional mind of a shill. You should be skeptical for ALL unreleased games, whos entire public showing is intended to get you to buy the game on day 1, To generate HYPE. If you really cared about reasonable discourse, no public sentiment should matter about a game til months after its release. What you're trying to do is muddy the waters of legitimate criticism with nonsense like "people are upset only 10% of the planets will have life" to dismiss all negative outlooks.
Now, Specifically to do with Starfield: To ignore Bethesda's history and not be capable of extrapolating the problems this game is very likely to share with their recent and distant game releases is pure ignorance. The lack of some of the features considered core to the games in the genre Starfield is releasing in can very easily be attributed to the lacking and failures of their past, specifically to do with dev competence and the engine they've been building their games on for the past 2 decades. Modder's have gotten vehicles and multiplayer working in the creation engine where the actual dev studio has yet to conquer either.
The fact you used Redfall as the example of why people have misgivings about the studios capability and not FO76 Which WAS made by Softworks and the Austin studio tells me just how disingenuous this video is. No one has even mentioned Redfall in the Starfield discussion outside of the state of Zenimax's lacking game releases. I dont know if this is some kind of rectification video for yourself to justify your own hype for it. But this is purely strawmen. You say "I do have my doubts" but dont even say what a single one of them are.
There are tons of reasons to be skeptical about this game, from the genre it occupies, to the technical capacity of the studio, to the past release history of the studio, to the actual content and lack of certain content that we now know is present in the game.
NONE of which you bother listing or addressing in this video. Just one big dismissal of fake criticism and regurgitation of marketing lines about the game.
@@kurthectic7778 Exactly, he completely ignored the 600 pound Gorilla in the room that was Fallout 76, it's launch and Bethesda's behaviour towards fans who criticized it.
And 76 was Bethesda's last game before this.
Also thanks to their slick marketing, nobody had an idea how bad 76 was before the reviews.
@@LupusAries Except they did. They were people like me who were being just as critical and skeptical of what Bethesda was actually capable of and the kind of stuff the game did or didn't have as we are doing now with Starfield. I had no way of knowing how unplayable the game turned out to be. But was also not swept away by the delusion that it would be the same product they were advertising and hyping.
Cautiously optimistic for Starfield, I hope Bethesda will make its grand return this year.
Don’t hold your breath.
@@thejudge1712 how great are your games ?? oh... i thought so
@@id_avalon3451 I’m a consumer and so are you. You see, when we spend our hard earned dollars on a triple A game, there is a certain level of expectation to be met. I know this may be hard for you, but follow closely; when that game ends up being a huge disappointment, we are allowed to be upset over our purchase and therefore, allowed to criticize it: especially when it’s developed by a company who has released two duds. Do you understand?
You’re welcome
@@thejudge1712 they also released countless blockbusters that were game of the year and played for over a decade. So 2 "duds" which are opinions of 2 of their games one of which was a flop by a lot if standards but the other was mainly "bad" because the fans had a certain way they like their game and they tried something different.
That's not at all the same as they totally f*cked up.
The mod community on almost all of their games has turned a simple foundation into a massive decade long living game. You have a right to be mad when you play a game you don't like if it doesn't reach the expectations set by the marketing but if you self hype it that's not the developers fault. And if you don't like a feature that's also hard to pin on the developer as it's not bad just a miss.
You haven't played this game you have no knowledge that anyone else doesn't have. You're being cynical and nobody cares about your desire to say I told you so.
You're going to say every little detail that isn't perfect is a massive problem and make a big deal about it because you're cynical. That's your right you can ruin things for yourself every time i don't care. But you're not actually being fair and honest by pretending BGS didn't create morrowind oblivion skyrim fallout 3 and several lesser known very well put together very boundary pushing games.
Oh boo hoo two games weren't as good 😭
Cry about it and get over it. Look at this with cautious optimism that's fine but you're just being a bunch of babies at this point
@@madgodloki Aww, did I hurt your feelings? Does your vagina hurt? Take some Midol and a nap and you’ll be right as rain. 😂😂😂
I’m tired of the exclusivity argument. PlayStation gas so many exclusives that keep other people from playing unless they have a PlayStation, so naturally they cry “wah, it’s not fair that only pc and Xbox can play!”. Last exclusive that I wanted to play was forbidden west but quess what .I couldn’t because it is PlayStation only. I didn’t cry about. I just thought “ oh well” and moved on.
Couldn’t agree more!
Only little kids and teenagers whine about exclusivity because they can't buy consoles, they either get their consoles from their mommies for Christmas or Birthday. You can always buy the Playstation and play those games. I don't buy too many consoles because I simply don't have time, but is true when I was younger I was limited to one console as I did not work to buy my own things otherwise I would have had all the consoles I wanted when young.
not to mention that they cry too when the exclusives go on steam like 5 years later lol i will never understand that juvenile reaction from grown men when you played the game 5 years in advance, it's like what does it change in your life seriously?
Honestly, Bethesda games suck on PlayStation, they should’ve never even been released on it. Sony doesn’t really let you use any mods. PS4 has my favorite controller, so I play Skyrim and fallout on steam, with my PS4 controller. 🙃 I’m boycotting Starfield though, simply because I’m mad that they glossed over their 2 biggest titles (effectively making us wait 15-20 years for a new one), for something that nobody cares about.
Arkane Studios is a sister company to Bethesda, under the ZeniMax umbrella. Even though Bethesda did publish Redfall, we have little to no control over Arkane's development process. The success or failure of Arkane games is no reflection on Bethesda's ability to develop our own titles.
I realize that among fans, the problems with Redfall result in negativity "by association" with Bethesda, but this attitude really is unfounded. There is no crossover of development talent nor resources between the two companies.
In addition, unlike some of our previous titles, we are intentionally taking a significant amount of extra time to polish Starfield and fix bugs. We are currently focusing all of our efforts to those goals. Everyone is playtesting the game and reporting any bugs that we find, and then we are carefully analyzing those bugs and fixing them to make sure that A) they don't happen again, and B) the bug fix doesn't cause bugs somewhere else in the game.
Now I realize that with a game as massive as Starfield, it is entirely possible that some bugs may slip through into release in September. We are doing everything we can to minimize that, but we also acknowledge reality: 3 million+ players will find bugs much faster and more thoroughly than our entire team ever could. Don't worry--we have already planned to stay in bug fixing mode, even after release.
It's simple. I no longer trust Bethesda. If they can pull it off? Cool. If not? My expectations will have been met.
This is the attitude of people who can't separate publisher and studio.
Modding Bethesda RPGs is a very fun & consistent hobby for me & I just love it, despite it's bugs & flaws. Very excited for Starfield.
Pretty excited for the mods for a modern Bethesda game
This is just trolling for effect; most folks are excited for it, but there will always be a percentage who like hating.
not always trolling, some people live lives just fgull of frustrations, vent and spread their negativity online is one way for them to cope with it. even on a video of a puppy playing or baby smiling you wil see people downvoting it or talking trash. unfortunatly thats people just being people
Totally true
Dismiss skepticism for trolling...okay buddy. Hope you like another fallout 76 on release
@@newnamesameperson397 go and impress us.. please make your own game instead of spreading negativity. Do something that spreads joy. Use all that free time and start producing.
@@newnamesameperson397 enjoy spiderman and gran turismo... the rest of us will be playing Starfield
It's not Starfield getting shit, it's Bethesda. In true Bethesda history, people expect the game at launch to be filled with bugs and exploits. Skyrim still has the same bugs and glitches it had at release. Fallout 4 still doesn't allow full rebinding of keys, as some keybinds (such as Hold Breath while aiming down the scope) are hardcoded and can't be rebound, like...why exactly was it necessary for this button to be hardcoded? Oh no reason, just developer incompetence.
So people have low expectations.
Actually, scamfailed too. Toddy is lying too much again.
@@vladcrow4225 How do you know he's lying? You're just assuming because of past history.
@@sygmarvexarion7891 He opens his mouth = he's lying. Seen it too many times since Buggerfall. And he's lying more than usual about scamfailed. Not a good sign.
This world is filled with hateful people.
I agree wholeheartedly. I'm trying my best to surround myself with positive people. Both in games and in real life. It's just so exhausting trying to live up to high expectations in society.
When it comes to gaming it's more extreme criticism than hate. These last few years gamers have been promised good games by devs just to get unfinished messy games, some people even pre order those games in that unfinished state, it has happen so many times that people are critical of any game coming out. I think Extreme criticism is a good thing for gaming, it lets Devs know, if they promise a good game either deliver or face backlash.
Of course you need to be skeptical about Starfield. It's Bethesda.
If someone never played a videogame before it's excusable, but everyone else should know better.
(Also never pre-order)
People don't hate the game, they hate the company and their mindset as developers ("We will release an unfinished game and let the community fix and expand it with their mods because our game engine is so easy to tinker with, and because we are completely incompetent we will not even touch it ourselves or try to make something even remotely up to modern standards").
Skyrim was garbage and a broken mess at release full of half-baked mechanics, Fallout 4 had almost all of the same engine problems and bugs as Skyrim did years earlier, Fallout 76 was an entire landfill by itself.
After screwing over your fanbase with mediocre and unfinished games that are released in an Alpha stage with hundreds of bugs for over 10 years, you deserve all the hate and doubt you get as a company.
Starfield is their chance to fix this, but if this is another broken mess, they should just disband the company and never again work in the field.
Bethesda track record is a reason to be skeptical
Oblivion GOTY
Skyrim GOTY
Fallout 4 GOTY
Fallout 76 Trash
That's not exactly a bad track record
Their track record is amazing for single player games. The track record for thei main studio is also amazing.
@@SirBrandan goty doesn't exactly mean much. The story in skyrim and fallout 4 were trash along with the rpg elements not to mention how buggy and janky they still are without modding in the unofficial patch
@@newnamesameperson397 they made one of the top mmos ever made also. ESO
Ah yes Bethesda's track record of selling millions upon millions of copies of games, winning multiple awards & GOTY, and almost all games scoring between 80+/94 on the Metascore (not 76) and are played decades later...
I just bought an Xbox X for the occasion 😊
Starfiled will be a huge success, one word to rule all MODS.
Because Bethesda has been a bit of a dumpster fire these last several years. I dont actively hate on it, but I have very low expectations and will not preorder, instead waiting to see some reviews after it comes out
It's not just comments. Forbes, PC Mag, and other irrelevant online publishers are trying so hard to find anything to hate. It's really strange.
Yeah I just read a PC mag article earlier today saying the games an empty boring sandbox yet it's not even out yet. I don't get it
YOU KNOW WHY😂😂😂😂
some people feel like they owe sony loyalty when all you owe yourself is good games😊👍🏾
It's the recent history of triple a games being absolute garbage on launch
Because Bethesda, that's why. You can't trust these companies anymore.
dont care what i hear about this game. i wanna play it and thats it. people can talk negative about starfield but they will still buy it...yes even you sony hardcore fans 🙂
Considering the latest games over the past few games, most came out disappointing... Despite all the advancements in technology we have, des, writers, and producers are regressing in quality.
Everybody is going to be disappointed about this game, not because of this game will be bad (matter of facts, we're looking at the next GOTY), but because Starfield gained so much traction that gamers now have gigantic expectations. A lot of gamers are comparing this game to No Man's Sky and Star Citizen, games that are out for years and have been refined during these years. Starfield is going to a very good game, but it will have his personality, gamers need to understand that it won't be a No Man's Sky 3.0.
This year the best game will be Baldur's Gate 3, no other game should even be considered as a contest. Starfield will not even get close to the depth and quality of Baldur's Gate 3.
@@OnigoroshiZero BG3 is a niche genre. I think it will not win.
If there were only 10 planets with life and had 30 hours worth of gameplay on each of those planets. That's more than enough...
10% of planets being habitable, let alone ideal for life, seems like a high amount. That's rougly the ratio for just our star, and Earths are not that common (having a proper atmosphere, appropriate distance from a star, etc). One in ten seems overly generous but it sounds like there's also no shortage of desolate worlds.
@@charlessmith5465 agreed! People need to chill a bit. Most Mass Effect games had very few actual traversable planets, and they were very fleshed out games. StarField will be fine.
Simple answer... RSI fans are upset about all the money they have sunk into a game with a similar premise to this one. And have been jerked around like the dupes they are! They have spent lots of money on a game that is still somehow incomplete. And this one even lets you build your own starships, not pay thousands of dollars for some concept that looks more and more like a scam every year!
Not even in the slightest, these are very different games with very different play styles. I think it is actually Bethesda hate more than anything plus a bit of high expectations. I am not surprised in the slightest that Star Citizen isn’t finished because of the overwhelming scope, Plus I remember what happened to/with Freelancer. Speaking of Freelancer, which this is no hate on StarField but it looks like it will have about the same level of space combat/interaction and a similar transition from space to planets. No dynamically landing wherever you want by flying down from orbit .
@@prof4z296 For what it was worth I was being hyperbolic..
I'm not hatting on Starfeild, but open world games have settled on a particular style and i really hate both of these two styles. Even going back to Fallout 4 this was the way Bethesda shifted their game design for open worlds. For on theirs this strict Ubisoft design of strict activates to the game, it give the worlds this sterile lifeless tot hem as it makes everything really one off in its existence. The second part for lack of a better word is Destiny patrol loops, you kill random groups of mobs with little to zero context to gather your "materials" to pad you stats on the line level. The thing is i just find this structure which has become the de facto standard of open world games just really really boring.
I hope Starfield is good, but I have no goodwill left for Bethesda so I'll wait for proper reviews
I would never understand people going out of their way to hate on a game they don’t even plan on playing.
Not that Starfield and Star Sitizen are in the same league, but Star Citizen current has 4 planets only (2 of which you don't really have ground to land on), and plenty of bugs.
People still have a lot of fun on it, I have no doubt that Starfield will be amazing. Very different from Star Citizen and No man sky, but still very fun !
Looking forward to it.
Complexity and fidelity increase the work exponentially, meaning Starfield chose what and how to tackle things very differently.
I will enjoy starfield for now and my great-great grandchildren can enjoy starcitizen
@@NineSeptims 🤣
Jokes aside, it feels like SQ42 is getting near the end of it's dev process, and they might assign more people to the PU, which will hopefully help with the speed of things.
(wishful thinking, I know 😅)
@@Quent1nB sure, Answer the Call 2016.. still holding my phone
I am extremely excited
Good to hear shaun!!
Good majority of the hate is coming for the PlayStation side because they don't want to buy a cheap series s play the game. The same bunch of brainless that think that Xbox shouldn't have their own exclusive.
The hate is because the Xbox label is on it, and it is exclusive TO Xbox. Funny how that is.
Couldn't care less about Billybox and PayStation. Will pirate, seed and delete PC version of scamfailed anyway.
A lot of people want to see this game fail out of spite against Xbox and others are hyping this game to be the game of the year.
Do I think it's going to be a bad game? No. Do I think it's going to be very buggy? Well it's Bethesda after all. Who knows maybe game of the year. PS5 owner by the way.
I’m genuinely indifferent.
Can't wait for Starfield tbh, last space games I played were Star Citizen and No Man's Sky. And I can really say that they will go into history after Starfield is released.
Pretty ridiculous statement unless you're speaking for yourself.
The space exploration game that doesnt let you enter atmosphere with your own ship nor has any ground exploration vehicles is apparently going to make redundant two much bigger games with both of those things just because it has more quests.
I think a lot of the hate is coming from Playstation fans (only WE deserve great exclusives) and salty Star Citizen players. (how could any space game be good when we waited this long and are still playing a tech demo?)
Then there's the "whatever I'm not excited about must be crap because if it was good I'd be excited about it." crowd.
It's not skepticism, it's cynicism, which is completely different. For example, all good scientists are skeptical, but it would be very difficult (and perhaps impossible) for a cynic to be a good scientist.
If you read the hater posts, they're fundamentally similar. They're almost all one-liners along the lines of "Starfield gonna be bad hur hur", and "Starfield gonna flop so hard don't buy", etc. They're barely literate, and never explain why this might be the case other than the obligatory "Cos Bugthesda", "Cos FO76", "Cos Redfield" [sic], "Tell me lies Todd", or "16x the detail". The sad fact is that these guys are cretins with no analytical capability, as unfortunately there is no law requiring internet users to have a certain minimum IQ.
Attempting to communicate with these creatures is pointless. Personally I just hunt them down for sport occasionally to amuse myself :D
Most people that hates on a game they have never played usually don't think the game will be to their liking to begin with or think the game should be made to what they think they would like. I'm sure all of us are a little guilty of that. haha
If I'm concerned about Starfield, it's specifically because it's coming to GamePass on day 1. Historically, when that is the case, bad things tend to happen. Look no further than Redfall for an example.
All Xbox first-party games go into GamePass on day 1. What you're saying is your worried because it's a AAA game published by Microsoft.
hate is fine. just like how we already love it even before it releases, they can feel free to ignore us. and we should feel free to ignore them.
The negativity is from playstation fanboys that believe only playstation has a right to exclusives. Maybe they should buy an Xbox or PC if they want to play it.
I think a lot of it is a massive dose of salt from PS5 owners who have found out they are not getting it.
Because we had to wait 15 years for another TES or Fallout because of it! Boycott Starfield!!!
I’ve not spoken to anyone anywhere different countries included that aren’t creaming their pants over excitement for this game..
16 times the details is the reason why.
I mean it's set on realism it's not in a sci-fi alternate world it's in 300 years into the future for us and let's face it we don't know what it's going to look like in that time we're all we going to be dead
We can only envision at this point:)
@@KaletheRelentless and the be fair with the way things are going now we might not be around 300 years humanity might be extinct
People were whining about Bethesda games even when their Singleplayer games were winning GOTY consecutively. After Fallout 76 (which wasn't even directed by Todd Howard) they finally got the "look Look I told you so!" they wanted for years. Now Bethesda is going back to their roots with Starfield and the haters hate the fact that Starfield might end up being like Skyrim, Fallout 4, Fallout 3, Oblivion and Morrowind i.e. be very successful.
Honestly haven't liked anything bethesda has done since skyrim and Bethesda has been shitty and shaddy since then. There is just no more trust and i will remain skeptical untill proven otherwise.
@@NeonRaveHuskey Fallout 4 is amazing
Every big budget game gets hate, whether it's deserved or not. This is nothing new.
I have not seen anyone hate Baldur's Gate 3, and that game will crush everything else this year.
There isn't hate for this game. Most people are expecting a great game, likely with trademark Bethesda Jank.
No Mans Sky mad "procedural generation" a negative term even though a lot of companies have used it for a very long time on various scales. even oblivion used procedural generation.
I think the vast majority of the negative comments are from salty PS players and doomer types. Not that being sceptical isn't a good thing, but for so many, it's just vapid nonsense.
Even if it's a shitshow it will still have more life on its planets than star citizen, and no 30k's
The game has potentail. But I also think there is a lot of fear it might not be good, as bethesda had no such a good track record since the release of skyrim.
Facts.
Good ol PS Players
Im buying this game. Dont know if my rig will run it properly. Maybe need to upgrade.
Same here! Looking to upgrade as well haha
I wasnt hyped for the game to begin with, not a huge scifi fan and if I play scifi, I want truly different looking universe, not slightly evolved humanity, playing cowboys in space 100 years from now. From what they showed everything looks very underwhelming. Nothing that we havent seen before and some things look much worse than you´d expect from the top guys in the gaming industry. Guns have no weight behind them, lot of the UI looks cheap, character models would look dated 8 years ago, let alone today.
Obviously the potential such a game has is limitless, they can add content and scenarios like overrun ship or some outbreak on a planet forever, but how good the game is gonna depends on depth of its systems.
If people were hyped for the game and maybe are bit disappointed, its reasonable to try it first, but you cant give every game a chance and its fair to judge a product from what has been shown. I had no expectations and I found it disappointing, so I completely understand someone who was looking forward to this for years and doesnt like what he sees.
I was going to say it's disappointing because of all the exclusivity. Being an Xbox exclusive is okay, but that AMD sponsorship on PC is garbage.
I dont think you really have to ask this question. As someone who owns both a PS and Xbox, theres no other community that would be attacking this other than salty, toxic PS fanboys.
I love the idea for it. everything starfield is supposed to be I'm all for. hopefully when it comes out it is playable, but in this day and age I just expect new games to be unfinished. either way it should be fine 6 months to a year after release. I'll wait to. uy until I know its ready but I'm eager to get it.
Very true. I am in the same place as you are, at least thats my feeling. Was thinking if i should pre-order Starfield for a long time. I did pre-order it, since i hope it will fill in the blank space, but I carefully choose what to pre-order. Last time i pre-ordered something it was CP 2077 and ED: Odyssey, before that it was The Witcher 3. Even if Starfield has a bumpy start, which i hope it will not. There will be unfinished things, but i hope the scope of those wont be that big. Anyway, the main reason why i decided to pre-order Starfield is... the modding community. Those guys do miracles for Bethesda games and i will definetly play some total overhaul. Other reasons are very simple. One being the mixed bag of retro/modern style of starfield, like the sci-fi movies from 80s, things i grew up on. The other being a game that basically should fill in the blank space. I got enough of Frontier Developments bullshit, and became tired of the never ending development of star citizen. So far I replayed games like Mass Effect to fill in that gap, and came to the conclusion that i really dont mind being it Single Player. In fact, i prefer single player. Way less stuff to worry about and meta min maxers complaining at every corner. I just want to enjoy the game, thats all.
What I cant understand is why everyone has managed to convince themselves this is an open exploration game. They said in the video it wasnt, everyone is choosing to ignore it. No in atmosphere flight. Instanced landing zones on "some" of the 1000 planets, the rest are basically wallpaper. So you cutscene on to the planet, which is really just an instanced zone you can explore on foot. Then fly to the next one and do it again. The only difference between the exploration in Starfield and the exploration in Skyrim is you travel between instanced zones in a ship instead of on a horse.
Lmfao, Howard literally said "letting us the players to explore" but I guess you ignore it lmfao. Here have some tissue 🧻
Vocal minority hates Bethesda, thy also conflate the likes of 76 to main team Bethesda, when main team Bethesda have nothing to do with that game.
I'm not concerned that only 10% of the planets have life on them ... I'm more concerned that 0% of the characters seem to have any life in them. They all seem like MorOblivion NPCs. I love space, I explored all the planets in Mass Effect 1 to 100%. Space is awesome. Starfield just doesn't look ... fun. It's hard to describe. Gameplay keeps you entertained only so much, Fallout gameplay becomes boring after 10-15 hours. Making me build and manage settlements doesn't help. Now I have to build a ship yupeee says the kid in me that didn't afford legos when I was little, but I bet I won't dream about it when I turn off the game and go to bed. Take Baldurs Gate 3 for example... the rats in that game have more personality than the NPCs in Bethesda games, you can literally talk to animals in BG3 or DOS2 and they are more entertaining than main characters seem to be in Starfield. And THAT is what is concerning. Procedurally generated content is just lazy and it will always be worse than well-thought, creative, mind-stimulating, imaginative content.
This has been pushed back so many times its possible that the extra time has allowed them to polish it more and more, so the amount of bugs is reduced...well thats my hope.
Keyboard warriors out there will complain about anything. I'm sure bugs will exist and it'll really come into its own once modders get to cranking out some cool stuff. If its anything close to skyrim id log hundreds of hours into this.
I can't believe it's capped at 30fps
not on pc
People complained that No Man's Sky was too abundant in life on planets. Now those same people bash Starfield because of the opposite... people are great.
If anything I think NMS has way too many rocky and ocean planets. The flora and fauna are also too abundant, but not having any gas giants stands out. The stars also orbit the planets. 😑
most, if not all, are probably from angry PS5 owners
bethesda game are best played on PC.. just for 1 word "MOD"
Without mods and the dev console the games certainly feel incomplete to me. I feel similarly about Valve's games: a console port of Half-Life is not a full version of Half-Life.
Modern developers themselves are why people hold these views, before something is released. Why, cause how often is something hyped positively been unplayable or a buggy mess upon release?
Fallout 76 just left a bad taste in some people's mouths.
But I've seen what Bethesda can do. They've made banger open world RPG's like Skyrim and FO4, and this game is just them doing what they're best at. Also PS fanboys being mad because they have this strange obsession with their plastic brick of choice over the other plastic brick of choice.
Neither Skyrim nor FO4 are RPGs. They're action games.
@@MorrowworroM614 I'm sure you believe they aren't. Check again.
@@CapitalTeeth they're literally action games with a perk point system slapped on
@@MorrowworroM614 In that case, allow me to explain to you what an RPG is.
It is a type of game that puts focus on letting you, the player, imagine yourself as the character you play. If you call FO4 and Skyrim not an RPG, then you may also call The Outer Worlds and D&D not RPG's.
@@CapitalTeeth those last 2 listed are RPGs. I'm glad you know that. But the first 2 aren't.
What hate? People think this going to change gaming... I say this game is way overhypet
I will renew Gamepass for Starfield. If it sucks, then I will cancel said subscription and will be okay with only wasting 15 dollars as opposed to 70 for a shit game.
Plz don’t be buggy if it be bad Bethesda gonna die they are my favorite studio
Don't worry it won't. 😊
This is now MICROSOFT's Bethesda of Maryland, not Zenimax's.....And you'll see the difference with Starfield. 👍
If you are someone who complains because you cant play this game on playstation, you suck. Its because of this obsession with dumbing down the PC release to accomodate primative Console monkeys that most new games perform worse than they should on PC. I wish the industry would start releasing games exclusively for PC. If a game CAN be ported to console then fine, do it later. But having to neuter a game so it can run on your primative boxes is maddening.
Simple. Bethesda.
Completely avoiding fallout 76. But otherwise agreed.
I don't hate it but at the same time i dont care about it
@@kevone08 cuz the video title is kinda asking a question and I gave my answer. I'm not even saying "omg game is bad LOL Bethesda sux balz" like most of the haters are saying. I just am not interested in It. To me it feels like less interesting Mass Effect and I also don't like mass effect 🤷🏼♂️
Bethesda is all the answer you will ever need. 🙃
If PS owners want to play Stanfield then they should push to end exclusivity and have ps5 games on series x. Then no more exclusives and people can okay on the system that makes them happy w/cross-platform.
Just remember that Xbox was the first one to have the "jingle" EXCLUSIVE! during E3 this is what started this "war" for the best exclusive
@mizardelwana I don't care, maybe it's a new Era and we can end this stupidity. Let people play on the console they enjoy, cross play with friends, and maximize profits for good gaming companies.
@@mizardelwana That may be true about the jingle or whatever, but historically speaking "cross-platform" is much more the exception than it is the norm. Think back to the SNES vs Sega days, Playstation vs Sega Saturn vs N64, and so forth. There was no time we have the same titles on multiple platforms as a norm until 3rd party companies became the primary game developers. They are the ones who are interested in selling their games to the biggest number of people.
Lol its elder scrolls in space, it will have lots of bugs, but they will all get crushed by either the devs or the modders and just like skyrim it will be played by our kids, possibly even their kids with new definitive editions.
this is just a backlash again todd over-hyping everything since Skyrim
first time I hear negative on the game. think will do great
I think there may be a little bit of disappointment for some, as I don’t think it can be as perfect as it is idealized by some, but I think it will be “good.”
Because there are so many salty PS Glitter Unicorns, that would rather spread hate and lies like the cancer they are, rather than just shut up and play on their ''superior console'', as they all try too convince themselves and everyone else.
But how can it be, when these days, PS fan boys are so obsessed with what Xbox is doing, that you may as well go too a Pro Playstation UA-cam channel to find out what Microsoft are doing, rather than an Xbox one.
If you have noticed, 99.9% of all Starfield hate, poor news etc.. Comes from PS content creators and owners... Why? It isn't even going on the PS5? So why do they all care so much.
They're mostly Playstation fanboys
People like to be negative
My body is ready
2 words---Luke Stephens!
It dosnt,
It just ps fanboys bitter reactions..
Otherwise why would anyone hate the biggest game of this generation?
I mean a lot of people don't remember when Skyrim was first released...everyone dumped on it nonstop...now look 11-13 years later...I'm sure they are drying their tears about everyone shit talking with dollars from a game made 13 years ago and still making money. 😂🤣 I'm excited.
Thats good because this game is basically Skyrim. Anyone expecting a space exploration game are the ones in for a sad time.
@@razorback0z The only thing that's sad here is you
Haters hate. Got it
Hahahaha No Starfield for Ps5 fanboys
Because the Sony ponies can't play on the ps5 so they cry about it on twitter all day
Fallout 76. Next topic?
Simply because it’s an Xbox product. If it was PS or all platforms it’d be fine.
It's going to be the usual: Everything is made to look good in videos and screenshots, interesting for 10-15hrs gameplay and after that it's shelf life is expired when you see ho shallow and lame the game actually is underneath.
no coop why such a big world and still alone ):
Because of Fallout 76
Get on Steam pc
Because the entitled sony fans dont get it as an exclusive and it will not br on playstation. Simple.