I have been putting my design for a net 757X out there for months now. I have sent it to Boeing Aircraft but sadly no response yet. As with the 757 & 767 synergy, my design recreates that synergy for the new 757X. They should spin a single aisle 787 fuselage, modify the 787 wings to fit and build an appropriate empennage. The power comes from derated GEnx engines or just use the low thrust version that is available. As long as they keep the long gear struts, she will have a fresh new look with hints of the original 757-200 profile. They can bring all the electronics over and they might have a like type rating, which would be a huge selling point. The 757X-8 is the only airliner that could sit beside the 757-200 in my heart. Besides, I’ve spent the last several months learning to operate the 787, so there is that.
I like the comments in 9:45 time (seems to be professional and objective) around Boeing time struggle free out of other issues ... Boeing should have concentrate on 818 Blended Wing Body plane (which would've be modular plane between the models)..... would cover next model of" CATALINA modern model"..... depend on the size and the Need for US military .....
Ok, but they seem definitely unable to design anything as beautiful as section 41 front end. These new bows are better than airbuses, but no chance facing 707, 727 & 737...
Hey Boeing - end the 737 dependency. You've seen the benefit of the 767/757 synergy. So start on a single-aisle version of 787. And do it soon - real soon.
Mid market competition JetZero's BWB. USAF coughed up a quarter BILLION for a full scale flight demonstration ship. Scaled Composites signed on. Design's flight schedule calls for 2027.
"Setbacks in its latest models" is not the disease, it's the symptom. When Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas in 1997, the MD management took over and that was the beginning of the end. Right now, I feel riding on a Boeing airliner is about as safe as being a Boeing whistleblower.
BOEING - Boneheaded Office of Engineering Incompetence and Negligent Greed If you want the full picture you need to investigate Boeing's systemic failures in design and quality control. 1) Exploding fuel tanks (B707, B727, B737, B747 at least) - hundreds of deaths; 2) fuselage skin peel back (notably Aloha flight 243, Southwest flight 812 both B737); 3) Single point of failure with rudder jacks - hundreds of deaths. All three of the problems above (which are severe design and quality control problems) pre-date the the McDonnell Douglas merger. The question is not "Did the issues arise as a result of the merger?" but "Did the issues worsen as a result of the merger?"
I never quite understood that deal. How did an essentially bankrupt Douglass buy (check it out if you don’t believe me) Boeing with Boeings money and maintain significant management presence. Then to top it off they took the headquarters out of Seattle and moved it to Chicago (not that far from Douglass’s old home in Missouri.) As far as I can tell, this company is far more Douglass than Boeing.
None of this is new information. Anyone that has an interest in this field already knows these ideas have been discussed before.......nothing shocking here!
Pls. refrain from just relaying the marketing gibberish of (in this case) Boeing. The concept presented A WHILE AGO is nothing else but that of the aging 767, only made in newer technology. The problem of Boeing is that they have an even more critical need for (i) a high-end narrowbody (an A321-alike) and (ii) a low-end narrowbody (against the A220), both combined replacing the ill-fated MAX. Boeing allegedly has no resources left to set in place two of these product lines, let alone all three. So there is NOTHING here that would "SHOCK The Entire Aviation Industry NOW". Not now and not ever. THIS aircraft will not be built. Furthermore, there is NO 757 replacement market left. AMERICAN, UNITED, DELTA, ICELANDAIR, CONDOR: They all go with the A321neo/XLR. The only shocking observation is the apparent inability of certain video-bloggers to use appropriate language.
Hahaha, looking at Boeing’s “quality” issues with all their newer lines, do you really think this would be able to save Boeing’s rear-end? Yea, a lot of time will pass until Boeing indeed gets its “quality” issues fixed, a new plane will make this even more complicated. If it’s a Boeing, I ain’t going (at least for the foreseeable future).
"NEW Boeing 797 Just SHOCKED The Entire Aviation Industry NOW!" What kind of bs video and click bait is this?
Maybe AI generated content? I hear a lot of "likely" or "possibly" and "expected", so all pretty vague statements
@@rc-fannl7364 It has got to be AI. There are lots of words, but they really don't say anything new!
How does this clearly AI-generated fake clickbait get recommended to so many people?
@@plane_nerd Maybe by an AI powered recommendation algorithm?
I have been putting my design for a net 757X out there for months now. I have sent it to Boeing Aircraft but sadly no response yet. As with the 757 & 767 synergy, my design recreates that synergy for the new 757X. They should spin a single aisle 787 fuselage, modify the 787 wings to fit and build an appropriate empennage. The power comes from derated GEnx engines or just use the low thrust version that is available. As long as they keep the long gear struts, she will have a fresh new look with hints of the original 757-200 profile. They can bring all the electronics over and they might have a like type rating, which would be a huge selling point. The 757X-8 is the only airliner that could sit beside the 757-200 in my heart. Besides, I’ve spent the last several months learning to operate the 787, so there is that.
You’re delusional. There will most definitely never be another 757 derivative built. Ever. The tooling is gone.
@@tomdavis8757 read my post again, think about it, then realize what I said. It has nothing to do with the original.
Will the 797 crash 3 times before it is halted?
Boeing has made it clear that a 797 is not in the works ... this is false information.
Just a bunch of words put together that don't really say anything.
Keep this work up
I liked the 757...long legs and "big guns".
Sure. I like it as well. But it’s thirsty and expensive to build. It’s astonishing how quickly a 757 can get airborne at full thrust.
787 but chopped to 2/3. Downsized wing box, wings, engines to scale and that's the 757 replacement.
It’s called Shrinkflation 😂
I like the comments in 9:45 time (seems to be professional and objective) around Boeing time struggle free out of other issues ...
Boeing should have concentrate on 818 Blended Wing Body plane (which would've be modular plane between the models).....
would cover next model of" CATALINA modern model"..... depend on the size and the Need for US military .....
Airbus is killing Boeing right now.
will it stay in the air how long before it crashes into the ground
Hoch hinaus aber wieder am falschen Ort gespart.... Abwarten....
Here we go ..
“Shocking” the world again into oblivion .. everything now a days is a SHOCK
Clickbait
The Boeing 797 maybe mixed with 737 and 787
Ok, but they seem definitely unable to design anything as beautiful as section 41 front end. These new bows are better than airbuses, but no chance facing 707, 727 & 737...
You think Boeing will send a hitman for voices in favor of the whistleblowers...
Boeing is apparently waiting for new engine technology before doing anything on a new narrowbody
I believe the 797 with definitely be a narrowbody but will look exactly like a 787 just in a narrowbody form 💯💯💯💯💯
It would appear that Boeing missed an opportunity to build new aircraft as sisters like the 757/767.
In dream 🤣🤣
I think Boeing should recreate the 747 because airlines are retiring them for example the 747-9/10X
If it’s not an Airbus… I’ll take the bus
This video could be a third of its duration. It’s repetitive and “ by the mid 2020’s Boeing saw …” so now a crystal ball as well?
Hey Boeing - end the 737 dependency. You've seen the benefit of the 767/757 synergy. So start on a single-aisle version of 787.
And do it soon - real soon.
Mid market competition JetZero's BWB. USAF coughed up a quarter BILLION for a full scale flight demonstration ship. Scaled Composites signed on. Design's flight schedule calls for 2027.
"Setbacks in its latest models" is not the disease, it's the symptom. When Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas in 1997, the MD management took over and that was the beginning of the end. Right now, I feel riding on a Boeing airliner is about as safe as being a Boeing whistleblower.
BOEING - Boneheaded Office of Engineering Incompetence and Negligent Greed
If you want the full picture you need to investigate Boeing's systemic failures in design and quality control. 1) Exploding fuel tanks (B707, B727, B737, B747 at least) - hundreds of deaths; 2) fuselage skin peel back (notably Aloha flight 243, Southwest flight 812 both B737); 3) Single point of failure with rudder jacks - hundreds of deaths. All three of the problems above (which are severe design and quality control problems) pre-date the the McDonnell Douglas merger. The question is not "Did the issues arise as a result of the merger?" but "Did the issues worsen as a result of the merger?"
I never quite understood that deal. How did an essentially bankrupt Douglass buy (check it out if you don’t believe me) Boeing with Boeings money and maintain significant management presence. Then to top it off they took the headquarters out of Seattle and moved it to Chicago (not that far from Douglass’s old home in Missouri.)
As far as I can tell, this company is far more Douglass than Boeing.
Just another Boeing paper airplane. They are 10 years to late.
Yes I agree.
A321XLR: the 777-200LR of Airbus
It's all bollocks. Why do we need another plane? "More efficient" they say? Will they reduce airfares as a result? I think not.
今の状況でこの仮説は非現実的とはっきり断言する
Where is the shock information?!
None of this is new information. Anyone that has an interest in this field already knows these ideas have been discussed before.......nothing shocking here!
There’s no 797 coming anytime soon. Just a 777-8 passenger model 🤷🏽♂️
BOEING = 797 : NEW = MODEL 'S :
LANÇAMENTOS :
PARA : 300 PASSENGER : ÓTIMO ! : TAMANHO : VÔO : AUTONOMIA :
12.000 KM ;
FUTURE = AIRCRAFT =
COMMERCIAL :
GLOBAL = WORLD :
AIRCRAFT =
COMMERCIAL =
ESPERA ! : TODAS ! : COMPANHIAS ! ;
AÉREAS ! : FUTURO ! : PARA :
ANO : 2030 :
PRODUÇÃO ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😍🤩🤫🫢😲😲😲😲❤️💋💋💋💘😍✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️.
I LIKE IT
What ?
A new name for 737 Max -10
Boeing fired most of their skilled workmen. Now they’re trying hire some back.
Boeing must be prepared to expel alien in jealous mode attacking from behind.
How long it takes to develop a new aircraft? Boeing is already very very late
To be fair the A32X is an aging platform as well.
Title should say 737 max 10
I have 2 words for you: door plug
It coult be!
In what fantasy world do you live??
Boeing is a bummer Boeing got so many mass to clean up.
Pls. refrain from just relaying the marketing gibberish of (in this case) Boeing. The concept presented A WHILE AGO is nothing else but that of the aging 767, only made in newer technology. The problem of Boeing is that they have an even more critical need for (i) a high-end narrowbody (an A321-alike) and (ii) a low-end narrowbody (against the A220), both combined replacing the ill-fated MAX. Boeing allegedly has no resources left to set in place two of these product lines, let alone all three. So there is NOTHING here that would "SHOCK The Entire Aviation Industry NOW". Not now and not ever. THIS aircraft will not be built.
Furthermore, there is NO 757 replacement market left. AMERICAN, UNITED, DELTA, ICELANDAIR, CONDOR: They all go with the A321neo/XLR.
The only shocking observation is the apparent inability of certain video-bloggers to use appropriate language.
BOEING ISN'T INNOVATIVE ANY MORE, DON'T EXPECT ANYTHING EXCITING FROM THEM.
Hey are not even thinking about a clean sheet new model
Vaporware
BOEING CEO makes some stupid decisions, should of focus on the up graded 757.
Nope. Won’t happen. The 757 is dead, never to be built again. The tooling is gone
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!! An aircraft that is a paper reality, produced from air...
More AI BS with a robot voice.
Where are these made, China?
Thumb down and blocking.
I wouldn't build a toy airplane for these whining airline bean counters. I'll walk before I get on an Airbus. TD Atlanta USA
Just another disaster waiting to happen.
Hahaha, looking at Boeing’s “quality” issues with all their newer lines, do you really think this would be able to save Boeing’s rear-end? Yea, a lot of time will pass until Boeing indeed gets its “quality” issues fixed, a new plane will make this even more complicated. If it’s a Boeing, I ain’t going (at least for the foreseeable future).