Fantastic episode with Bishop Strickland. Thanks. I need to second his opinion regarding Catholics wanting to leave the Church. That is certainly not what the Church needs. What we need is for all the faithful Catholics to become saints. That's what would help tremendously the Church.
An American with deeply British roots and so grateful to all of you. I am always so moved with the truth and hope you all so eloquently and thoughtfully express. To see you and Bishop Strickland in the same podcast hitting the same notes of truth and love is going to be affirming and inspiring🙏
@@KitiwakeCan you give me the source of when Bishop Strickland said Pope Francis was a heretic? I know he is critical of some of the actions of Pope Francis, but I couldn’t find an instance of him actually saying he is a heretic.
"The greatest charity is the truth." ~Bishop Strickland John 14:1,6~ "Do not let your hearts be troubled. You have faith in God; have faith also in me. I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." ❤️🔥 💕✝️💦 Jesus, I Trust in You!
Katherine, Gavin and Mark, thank you all for your wonderful work. Your presentations are very informative and inspirational. May the good Lord continue to bless and protect the humble and holy BP Strickland. If only we had more prelates with his simple but cavernously deep faith the problems in the Church would vanish and the world would likely be a much better place. And God bless each of you, also.
I left an elegant Jesuit Catholic Church in favor of one that had unsophisticated, but devoted, people who came to worship God. I love being in the company of people who run in in their fast food uniforms to have a moment with the Lord.
One of the graces of the Sacrament of Marriage is the particular grace imparted to the parents that enables them to transmit the Faith to their children
to Irene Meerman, "enables them to transmit" (better put if consecrated married parents 'grace enabling exercise of an absolute power of authorisation of'), in uncertainty, belief, not "the Faith" as not including thinking. Belief is the keeping in uncertainty of the inseparability and qualitative equality of plural thinking and singular having faith. Mary as "full of grace" exercises this absolute power of her simultaneous authorisations of this keeping in uncertainty of thinking and having faith as "believed" (Lk 1:45) at Lk 1:29-45 and Mt 1:24 with thinking as "considered in her mind"(Lk 1:29) "How can this be...? (Lk 1:34), and having faith as "let it be to me" (Lk 1:38). It is the exercise of this absolute power that out-occults the occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate, evil of grooming by diseased identities of 'familyist' family members of psychologically and or emotionally vulnerable family members in their roles with purporting presuming in error separation of mind thinking and heart having faith when "the community of those who believed were of one heart and mind ["soul" in RSV]" (Acts 4:32). This groomed by diseased identities is of in error by helper of the family member roles purporting presuming separation of plural roles and singular identity. It is evident at Mk 5: 9: "My [singular] name is Legion; for we are many [plural]". This grooming is for occult, incest connected, economic advantage by tax-exemption embezzlements and lower insurance cost by fraud. The extreme tensions this grooming causes are withstood by this keeping in uncertainty of belief by Christ on his cross of his thinking mind: "My God, my God [plural as Trinity], why have you forsaken me?, and his having faith heart: "Father [singular], into your hands I commit my spirit."
Thank you for another enlightening discussion. In these unsettling and turbulent times we need solid Catholic teaching and leadership, which you, thanks be to God, are providing in the face of a very strange Magisterium. It is ironic that Dr Ashenden, formally of the Anglican Hierarchy, has become Catholic and the Hierarchy of our Holy Catholic Church has become Protestant, who would have thought such a thing could become a reality. For the Church and the salvation of souls...❤🙏🙏🙏❤️
A true Catholic should be more respectful towards the Magisterium instead of generalizing. Canon law 212 affirms that lay people have the right, indeed at times the duty, in keeping with their knowledge, competence and position, to manifest to the sacred Pastors their views on matters which concern the good of the Church. They have the right also to make their views known to others of Christ’s faithful, but in doing so they must always respect the integrity of faith and morals, show due reverence to the Pastors and take into account both the common good and the dignity of individuals. Saying that the Hierarchy has become Protestant is a sign of blatant disrespect for which you should seek absolution.
@georgesaguelton5751 The present Magisterium protests the settled doctrine contained in the Deposit of Faith. Thus, it has become protestant. I assume you are aware of the detail, some of them are spoken of in the video. I do not disrespect the Magisterium, nietherI do I follow their erroneous teaching because to do so leads to Hell. You might note I pray for the Church, which encompasses the Magisterium. Unfortunately, the Magisterium is under the sway of Satan. I would point you to Our Lady's message of Akita and the warning given by Pope St Paul VI in regard to the smoke of Satan having entered the Church. Not recognising the signs of the times is folly. The Magisterium and its members sadden me greatly in what is happening in the Church. That is why I pray for the Church and the Magisterium.
@@georgesaguelton5751 Respecting the magisterium as an institution is one thing, respecting the people occupying positions in it is another. The former should always be respected, the latter should be respected only to the extent that they as individuals possess virtue and do good. To the extend that they possess vice or do evil they deserve disrespect.
@@georgesaguelton5751 I imagine by Magisterium this is a referral to part not all of those occupying leadership positions similar to what is mentioned by Bishop Strickland. I imagine we can agree if a bishop, cardinal or pope is saying the Holy Spirit is opposed to or denying some core aspect of the faith that would be as the OP claims. Some examples could be a correct understanding of the Sacraments whether it be perverting Marriage or changing Holy Order to include those Christ excluded. Chaning or misrepresenting the creeds or those doctrines contained therein would be another great example. Specifically, things like Christ's divinity, the Holy Trinity, Virgin birth, etc.
@@georgesaguelton5751 I can remember that, at one time, everyone simply referred to the Pope as “the Pope”. In the same way as everyone simply referred to the Queen as “the Queen”. In fact, it is derogatory to add in the name of the person holding the office, as it means that we see them not in terms of the office which they hold, but as the named person sort of “filling in” for that office. So, for example, the press now almost always refers to the King as “King Charles” or even, sometimes, simply as “Charles” and the Pope is almost always referred to not as “the Pope” but as “Pope Francis”. Adding in the name actually derogates from the dignity of the holder of the office, in my view.
Gavin, the “power, wisdom and authority” that the Church possesses is terribly undermined by this current pontificate and, regretfully, the priestly abuse scandal with its antecedents and current examples that cry to heaven for true retribution ! It does not change the truth of your position, (for there is no other institution) It only highlights the grave need for restoring Her relevance. Great interview!
The Pope wrote to Bishop Strickland and informed him that he was being “relieved” of his position as Ordinary of the Diocese of Tyler. In fact, the Pope was quite prescient - Bishop Strickland is, in fact, from the sound of it, “relieved” not to be encumbered by all of the petty administrative tasks associated with being the Ordinary of a Diocese. He is free to do what I am sure that the Lord has, in fact, called him to do, act as a successor to the Apostles in boldly preaching the word of truth. I am sure that the Lord will provide him with all of the opportunities which he needs to enable him to fulfil his calling. If his enemies wished to use their influence in Rome to silence him, they may find that they are frustrated. Even if they did manage to silence him, the “very stones would cry out” as it is impossible to silence the Word of God, which will make itself heard by one means, if not by another.
Nonsense. To think that all problems can be solved by simply going back to the TLM are nonsense. So, if Pope Francis said the TLM, but then issued doubtful document after doubtful document, and hired pornographers to be head of the DDF, all problems would be solved?
Blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the Lord. Blessed are they who search his testimonies: that seek him with their whole heart. For they that work iniquity, have not walked in his ways. Thou hast commanded thy commandments to be kept most diligently.
can you imagine as Cupich said the TLM is compromising the church. this is a true Mass celebrated for at least 1000 years. a true holy Mass this cardinal has just dissed!! 😮
_CCC 907_ "In accord with the knowledge, competence, and preeminence which they possess, [lay people] have the right and even at times a duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church, and they have a right to make their opinion known to the other Christian faithful, with due regard to the integrity of faith and morals and reverence toward their pastors, and with consideration for the common good and the dignity of persons." Seeing a small part of our faith in action via this discussion was strengthening! Blessed be God forever!!
Unfortunately some of the discussions on this channel do not show appropriate respect for the Supreme Pontiff. Don't forget canon law 1404, The First See is judged by no one.
@@georgesaguelton5751 Have any of the panel made a judgement of PF? Have any of them expressed because of what PF is doing he is going to hell? Doesn't 1404 pertain to trials? In that context what is the relevance here to these discussions which are not trials?
I suggest watching all the programmes on this channel, especially Dr. Ashenden's opinions regarding the Holy Father. As a new Catholic Dr. Ashenden still has to leave behind his protestant past and accept canon law and catechism to the fullest.
@@georgesaguelton5751Notwithstanding I haven't watched all the episodes, your description of what DrGA has said are his opinions? Not judgements that condemn? If you could suggest the episode of his strongest opinion that would be helpful- please and thank you.
@@georgesaguelton5751 "Now when Peter had come to Antioch, I withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed;" "But He turned and said to Peter, “Get behind Me, Satan! You are an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.” This could be added to significantly, but you must know this already. God of course, judges all in the final judgement, which isn't what is going on here.
Acts 12 V 5 Peter thus was being kept in prison, but prayer by the church was fervently being made to God on his behalf. The pope needs our prayers. Jesus, Mary and Joseph we love you save souls, Save the consecrated, save the unborn and all the children of the world. Amen
We need to focus on Jesus in this unprecedented crisis of apostacy. Repent the kingdom of God is at hand. Salus animarum lex suprema. It's heartbreaking to see the the abysmal catechesis our catholic secondary schools.
To have supernatural faith is to have encountered the Holy Spirit in all his glorious truth and charity, and to have allowed him to inhabit the soul. Many people have travelled a way along the path of Christian understanding and believe they are sincere Christians, but haven’t been transformed by this supernatural faith. At least that’s how it seems to be to me.
Amen. You are 100% right! Without divine transformation of the soul by the Holy Spirit, you are not saved at all. Too many Christians in name only, in this generation.
An honour to have the beautiful Bishop Strickland. Yet again the Pope will be missing in action i.e. won't be celebrating Holy Thursday publicly this year. Is it even possible for the Vicar of Christ (a title he has struck off) to not be present at Christ's institution of the priesthood? Could you look into the theological, spiritual implications of this in a future podcast? 🙏 If at all possible.
What a holy and humble Bishop. Inspiring. The demise of the Old Rite Triduum at St Mary Moorfields is a very sad development. I don't think Cardinal Nichols is the real villain of the piece. I suspect he didn't seek permission for it to continue because he knew Cardinal Roach would say no. Thank heavens the latter is of an age such that he won't be appointed as Cardinal Nichols' successor at Westminster.
Milktoast and being made to feel guilty. This just reminds me of Ezekiel 13:22 “Because with lies you have made the heart of the righteous sad, whom I have not made sad; and you have strengthened the hands of the wicked, so that he does not turn from his wicked way to save his life. The Warning to false prophets Ezekiel 13 and 14 and Jeremiah 23. I sure this could be added from the warning by Our Lady, The letters to the seven churches, the warnings in the epistles and those by Our Lord Himself in the gospels.
Remember what Jesus Christ told us. In the end time's stay close to me. Yes the world will be dark and war's and even increase do not be afraid and do not focus to much on this world but on me.( Book of Matthew ). it's time to focus on heaven. This is a prophecy what must be for filled. Like in the book of jude We must keep Faith because there will be a time were the church doors are shut! So closeness to God, Jesus Christ the holy spirit and the mother will be crucial. The kingdom of God is inside us. ❤❤❤
First of all thank you for the time and trouble you go to make these videos it is very much appreciated. Also I agree with all you are saying. I was just wondering if you have read the life of Papa Frankie and the many strange events that occur therein. For instance from an early age his parents appear simply to have stopped talking to him. Also the fact that he behaved so horribly as Provincial of the Jesuits in Argentina he had to be moved to Germany? Also reports of his terrible temper , rants and autocratic behaviour in the Vatican? A lot of these it seems to me is of one who is totally diabolically possessed by the devil. In psychological terms we might speak of Narcisssstc sociopathic behaviour. Do you ever wonder if we dealing with the Satanic?
Please Gavin I had my Illumination of Conscience last year. Found out I had unknowingly committed incest in 1982 got Cancer in 1984. So King is ill probably doesn't even know about Rave at Canterbury Cathedral but as He is ultimately Head of C of E is guilty before God. Obviously Justin Welby more so. Please Gavin you like Moses who knew Pharaoh. You know King as former chaplain to His Majesty's late beloved mum. I can't see Queen turning a blind eye to Raves in Naves. Just because King doesn't know about these Raves doesn't let Him off hook in God's eyes. I want His Majesty to recover ASAP. Also Kate. I am praying for them both 🙏 Please do all you can to reach King Gavin. Mitigate Great Chastisement. You like Queen Esther had your position for such a time of this. God bless you Gavin. I just returned to Catholic Church in 2018. But spent 30 years before that telling World a Catholic Prophecy many thanks A
I think you’ll find that one of the reasons that we are Catholics is because we believe in the promise of Peter to Jesus, that the gates of hell will not prevail against the church that he has founded. So your image of the Church, taking on water and going down is not the one that we share. Instead, like all faithful Catholics down the ages where the bride of Christ is threatened, we rush to defend her, and if necessary, and if we have enough courage, to give our lives for her. The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church. The only thing that’s going down are those who repudiate the living Christ, as they will discover at the moment of judgement.
Long before the Commonwealth, Sir Edward Coke (Lord Chief Justice) gave his now famous opinion “The King is subject to no man, but is subject to God and the Law.” King Charles I lost his head as a result of disregarding this advice. The Pope is not above Canon Law, nor is he above the rules of natural justice, in particular, “hear the other side”. In removing Bishop Strickland without providing him with an opportunity to be heard, the Pope acted contrary to the rules of natural justice. Bishop Strickland is being too kind and charitable in this respect. While there is no one competent to prevent the Pope from acting contrary to Canon Law and contrary to the rules of natural justice, that does not mean that his behaviour should be condoned, or any attempt made to justify it. Quite simply, the enemies of Bishop Strickland, other members of the Bishops’ Conference, used their influence (in particular their ability to raise large sums of money to bail out the Vatican finances which are in a parlous state at present) to lean on the Pope to persuade him to act contrary to Canon Law and to the rules of natural justice. However, all things do work together for the good - this behaviour on the part of the Pope does make obvious to all his true character and does serve to release Bishop Strickland from the constraints to which he was subject as Ordinary of a Diocese. Perhaps Bishop Strickland and others concerned about the direction in which this Papacy is heading are right to stand back and accept the way in which the Pope is behaving - as the old adage says, “give him enough rope and he will hang himself.” Christian Charity, of course, does call upon us all to point out to the Pope where he is going wrong. We must pray that he will repent and turn from his ways. Naturally, for the sake of his immortal soul, I do hope and pray that he will do so. God does not desire anyone to be lost - neither do I, nor does any true Christian.
Regarding sex education, it might have been Peter Hitchens who reported that those who first imposed such education on schools, had as their, later admittted, objective, to undermine the family.
I am not interested in the new church Francis is creating.... the shutting down of the traditional teachings and liturgy is a heinous act to force the faithful into accepting the modernization of our faith with heretical changes and proposed changes.... I will continue walking up the hill to the foot of the cross on Calvery....
I do not mind removing statues and just replace them with pictures and leave the cross as it is, do not get me wrong, I am catholic. It is said we should not blown down and pray to them ( statues)
There have been Popes who have been good, bad and indifferent across the centuries. Sometimes, a historical perspective helps us to see the bigger picture. Just thought!
According to Aquinas (Summa Th. prima secundae, Q90, A4) every law is "an ordinance of reason for the common good, made by him who has care of the community, and promulgated". Was the papal ordinance restricting the celebration of the TLM made for the common good? Its stated purpose was to hinder "disunity". What kind of disunity? Not any and every kind. Only the disunity consisting of a church divided into one part of which adheres to pre-conciliar theology and another which does not. In reality it is not disunity that Francis wanted to eliminate. It is adherence to the pre-conciliar theology. If Francis merely wanted unity he could just as well have banned the novus ordo. Can the removal of adherence to the pre-conciliar theology be for the common good? No. Just the opposite. Vatican II sanctioned no change in theology. Its decrees were issued on the understanding that they were not doctrinally binding. Can Francis honestly (but mistakenly) believe that restricting the celebration of the TLM serves the common good? Only if he is an ignoramus or a complete idiot. He is neither. Therefore neither in fact nor in intention did Traditiones Custodes contain an ordinance of reason "for the common good". Therefore it contains no law. Therefore it contains nothing binding in conscience. Papal authority has its limits.
Silly question. Katherine where did you get the frames for your prints? What size is the opening? Can only find 5.5" x 5.5" opening. Will sacred heart fit within it?
Elijah and Jesus entered heaven in two very different ways, or had two very different ends to their earthly lives (though Jesus of course is still here in the Eucharist, etc.) How will the Church end? One would prefer the end of Elijah, but we might get the end of Jesus.
we had people in the Catholic Church teaching our kids that it was fine and inevitable that they would have sex before marriage--in a confirmation class!
galvin left the COE and joined Rome. when he got to Rome, he found out that the same forces were at work. its called politics. the coe was always a fudge. the papacy was always a political problem.
Ok, I really appreciate your channel but many of the things in this piece have made me wonder why on earth you don't have Father James Mawdsley on your channel. Truth, beauty, deep theological knowledge, very apparent love and holiness and he be is only in Lancaster area.
If the Pope is considered to the Supreme lawgiver, then why does he operate outside of established Canon Law? All laws of any sort, appropriate areas of morality. Some of his documents and expressed opinions are clearly outside of morality and outside of the principles of natural law. So why can't he be challenged in his role as Supremes lawgiver, where he steps outside of ethical and moral behaviour and the principles of natural law?
@@georgesaguelton5751 a curious Catholic. That's who. Some of the things that are happening are immoral. There is an implied presumption in the normal worlf, that anybody who holds a position or office of responsibility should be a fit and proper person and if, as in this case, their behaviour or value systems are at odds with the long established Catholic theology, then they're are obviously the wrong person for the office. And they should go, or politely be asked to leave or set up their own schismatic new version of the Church away from the present Church.
@@Kitiwake not a canon lawyer, but a person with legal training and background and therefore am extremely interested in this question. I prefer answers, not more irrelevant questions.
@@georgesaguelton5751and who are you to blindly accept everything? A Vatican staff member or Vatican loyalist? I prefer to think about issues from various angles, not just accept unquestioningly what is being pushed under my nose.
CHOOSE SPIRITUALITY IF YOU WANT THE FREEDOM THAT THE DIVINE BRINGS CHOOSE NON-DOGMATIC THEISM/NON-DOGMATIC FAITH IF YOU WANT COMMUNITY WITHOUT SPIRITUAL OR RELIGIOUS COERCION WHERE DO YOU THINK THIS VIDEO FALLS ON THE DOGMATIC THEISM/DOGMATIC FAITH/RELIGION vs NON-DOGMATIC THEISM/NON-DOGMATIC FAITH/RELIGION SPECTRUM?
The OT or the Torah is the first five books of the Hebrew Bible The Catholic Bible is made up of the Torah and the MT. The Catholic Bible has more books than the Protestant Bible. There is plenty of information on line. The Holy Family were Jews. Jesus, Mary and Joseph. The Rosary the Joyful Mysteries Mary brings Jesus to the Temple at eight days old and the last mystery of the Joyful Mysteries Mary finds the 12 year old Jesus talking with the Rabbis in the Temple.
The holy family of Jesus, Mary, and Joseph were Jews. The Joyful Mysteries of the Holy Rosary when Jesus is eight days old Mary and Joseph take him to the Temple the last mystery Mary finds Jesus at 12 years old talking with the Rabbis. The Catholic Bible is made up of the OT and NT. Father James Mawdsley's book Adam's Deep Sleep. The Passion of JC prefigured in the OT is excellent on this.
@@marygunning5121 yes thank you I am aware Jesus and all his family and friends were Jews. I love and want Jews to convert them to Jesus that said this term of “Judeo-Christian” is a Protestant word to ecumenise with Jews as an act of dispensationalism . Fr. Mawdsley is clear that to be a Christian is to abandon Judaism and the Talmudic/rabbinic laws that they worship and live by which are not biblical, further evidenced in Michael Hoffmann’s books. This old covenant ended when Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit in Mary. The Jews who became Jesus’ disciples eschewed the old laws and renounced all Jewish ties for the sake of Jesus. Judaism is wholly anti-Christ to adopt this chimerical word into Catholic vocabulary is wrong to say the least. St. Paul went on to preach that there is no Jew or gentile in Christ. The New Testament is full of examples of Jesus and his disciples denouncing the Pharisees and their followers, they were tasked to convert all the world including Jews. “Judeo-Christian” was designed with the intent to give dispensation to the Pharisees. Which is heresy. For they had him killed and rejected him. This is the legacy that modern Judaism has inherited through the rabbis and their Talmud and magic book the Zohar and it is fully anti-Christ.
@@seanjones1020 Thank you very much for this information I was unaware that Judeo-Christian is a Protestant word to ecumenise with the Jews as an act of dispensationalism. I did not know that. So much to learn.
I'm so disappointed to see Gavin here. I had quite liked him and was delighted that he converted to the full truth. But it appears once a protestant, always one. He doesn't know his place.
Indeed, canon law 212 affirms that lay people have the right, indeed at times the duty, in keeping with their knowledge, competence and position, to manifest to the sacred Pastors their views on matters which concern the good of the Church. They have the right also to make their views known to others of Christ’s faithful, but in doing so they must always respect the integrity of faith and morals, show due reverence to the Pastors and take into account both the common good and the dignity of individuals.
Gavin is the voice of reason and balance and highly intelligent. I like listening to him because he is calm, rational and never petty or vindictive. He frequently is extremely witty, and all in all makes for an excellent commentator. More, please.
@@georgesaguelton5751You seem to have no problem when the Holy Father fails to respect the integrity of faith and morals. When was blind obedience ever Catholic? Is there anything Pope Francis could do which you would criticise?
That's very uncharitable. I doubt he is asking to be interviewed. It is much more likely that people are asking to interview him and, to our great benefit, he accepts the inviation. I think you need to consider why so many "media platforms" want to interview him.
Unlike Cardinal Dolan, who’s said nothing in public after that “funeral?” Or any Catholic bishops when Fr. Martin had the NYT feature his “blessings?” Or when the “Sister of Perpetual Indulgence” were honored at an MLB game? Or any of the numerous instances that cause scandal and confusion?
That’s just rude. All it does is to expose the malevolence of the heart. Have you thought about reconsidering how much thoughtless malice you carry? You can be free of it if you want.
Right. Anyway , there were plenty of reasons to remove Strickland. Why do people act as if they are confused and can’t understand why. Disobedience is a reason good enough.
Dear Beanie, Red Beanie (verse 4 of 8) (To the tune of “Dear Abby” by John Prine) ua-cam.com/video/LJVFY_LX9Ik/v-deo.html Dear Beanie, Red Beanie, out of both sides he talks, celebrates his New Ordo in a great big old box. He don’t like Church teaching on natural law, cause it says that pervies can’t lay a lecherous paw. Sy-ynd, LA-Traddie. LA-Traddie, LA-Traddie, y’aint got no complaint. He is what he is and he ain’t what he ain’t. The Catechism states that it’s a disordered life, but the SCOTUS says OK, you can make him your wife. But we’re still dialoging.
Fantastic episode with Bishop Strickland. Thanks.
I need to second his opinion regarding Catholics wanting to leave the Church. That is certainly not what the Church needs. What we need is for all the faithful Catholics to become saints. That's what would help tremendously the Church.
This community is so vital, thank all three of you for your consistent work and Faith. X 🙏🔥
Bishop Strickland is looking so well at the moment
“.... still, to conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.”
Saint John Henry Newman
Great get guys. Love seeing the show get better each episode.
Thank you Anthony 🙏
Another edifying show. May God bless and strengthen Bp Strickland. Thank you all.
Thank you 🙏
An American with deeply British roots and so grateful to all of you. I am always so moved with the truth and hope you all so eloquently and thoughtfully express. To see you and Bishop Strickland in the same podcast hitting the same notes of truth and love is going to be affirming and inspiring🙏
Amen
Bishop Strickland called the pope a heretic.
The pope!!
And you think he's great?
@@KitiwakeCan you give me the source of when Bishop Strickland said Pope Francis was a heretic? I know he is critical of some of the actions of Pope Francis, but I couldn’t find an instance of him actually saying he is a heretic.
I've followed him for years and never heard bishop Strickland declare pf a heretic.
"The greatest charity is the truth." ~Bishop Strickland
John 14:1,6~ "Do not let your hearts be troubled. You have faith in God; have faith also in me. I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." ❤️🔥
💕✝️💦 Jesus, I Trust in You!
It’s obvious who the enemy is and we know who is advising the pope. The POPE is advising the pope!
Don’t give him a pass!
The truth is the highest authority
Dr. A, they have not silenced Bishop Strickland, he is delightfully more vocal than ever, Praise God.
Katherine, Gavin and Mark, thank you all for your wonderful work. Your presentations are very informative and inspirational. May the good Lord continue to bless and protect the humble and holy BP Strickland. If only we had more prelates with his simple but cavernously deep faith the problems in the Church would vanish and the world would likely be a much better place. And God bless each of you, also.
I love listening to you all. Thank you.
Fantastic. Love Bishop Strickland!
I left an elegant Jesuit Catholic Church in favor of one that had unsophisticated, but devoted, people who came to worship God. I love being in the company of people who run in in their fast food uniforms to have a moment with the Lord.
Great show! I'm very grateful to you all!
Love you Bishop Strickland!!!!!!!!!
One of the graces of the Sacrament of Marriage is the particular grace imparted to the parents that enables them to transmit the Faith to their children
Unfortunately my parents had no faith and they had a ethnicity not a fairh
to Irene Meerman, "enables them to transmit" (better put if consecrated married parents 'grace enabling exercise of an absolute power of authorisation of'), in uncertainty, belief, not "the Faith" as not including thinking. Belief is the keeping in uncertainty of the inseparability and qualitative equality of plural thinking and singular having faith.
Mary as "full of grace" exercises this absolute power of her simultaneous authorisations of this keeping in uncertainty of thinking and having faith as "believed" (Lk 1:45) at Lk 1:29-45 and Mt 1:24 with thinking as "considered in her mind"(Lk 1:29) "How can this be...? (Lk 1:34), and having faith as "let it be to me" (Lk 1:38).
It is the exercise of this absolute power that out-occults the occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate, evil of grooming by diseased identities of 'familyist' family members of psychologically and or emotionally vulnerable family members in their roles with purporting presuming in error separation of mind thinking and heart having faith when "the community of those who believed were of one heart and mind ["soul" in RSV]" (Acts 4:32).
This groomed by diseased identities is of in error by helper of the family member roles purporting presuming separation of plural roles and singular identity. It is evident at Mk 5: 9: "My [singular] name is Legion; for we are many [plural]".
This grooming is for occult, incest connected, economic advantage by tax-exemption embezzlements and lower insurance cost by fraud.
The extreme tensions this grooming causes are withstood by this keeping in uncertainty of belief by Christ on his cross of his thinking mind: "My God, my God [plural as Trinity], why have you forsaken me?, and his having faith heart: "Father [singular], into your hands I commit my spirit."
Thank you for another enlightening discussion. In these unsettling and turbulent times we need solid Catholic teaching and leadership, which you, thanks be to God, are providing in the face of a very strange Magisterium.
It is ironic that Dr Ashenden, formally of the Anglican Hierarchy, has become Catholic and the Hierarchy of our Holy Catholic Church has become Protestant, who would have thought such a thing could become a reality.
For the Church and the salvation of souls...❤🙏🙏🙏❤️
A true Catholic should be more respectful towards the Magisterium instead of generalizing. Canon law 212 affirms that lay people have the right, indeed at times the duty, in keeping with their knowledge, competence and position, to manifest to the sacred Pastors their views on matters which concern the good of the Church. They have the right also to make their views known to others of Christ’s faithful, but in doing so they must always respect the integrity of faith and morals, show due reverence to the Pastors and take into account both the common good and the dignity of individuals. Saying that the Hierarchy has become Protestant is a sign of blatant disrespect for which you should seek absolution.
@georgesaguelton5751 The present Magisterium protests the settled doctrine contained in the Deposit of Faith. Thus, it has become protestant. I assume you are aware of the detail, some of them are spoken of in the video.
I do not disrespect the Magisterium, nietherI do I follow their erroneous teaching because to do so leads to Hell. You might note I pray for the Church, which encompasses the Magisterium. Unfortunately, the Magisterium is under the sway of Satan. I would point you to Our Lady's message of Akita and the warning given by Pope St Paul VI in regard to the smoke of Satan having entered the Church. Not recognising the signs of the times is folly.
The Magisterium and its members sadden me greatly in what is happening in the Church. That is why I pray for the Church and the Magisterium.
@@georgesaguelton5751 Respecting the magisterium as an institution is one thing, respecting the people occupying positions in it is another. The former should always be respected, the latter should be respected only to the extent that they as individuals possess virtue and do good. To the extend that they possess vice or do evil they deserve disrespect.
@@georgesaguelton5751 I imagine by Magisterium this is a referral to part not all of those occupying leadership positions similar to what is mentioned by Bishop Strickland. I imagine we can agree if a bishop, cardinal or pope is saying the Holy Spirit is opposed to or denying some core aspect of the faith that would be as the OP claims. Some examples could be a correct understanding of the Sacraments whether it be perverting Marriage or changing Holy Order to include those Christ excluded. Chaning or misrepresenting the creeds or those doctrines contained therein would be another great example. Specifically, things like Christ's divinity, the Holy Trinity, Virgin birth, etc.
Bishop Strickland is, as Mark said, a holy priest. How Francis could have treated him with such disrespect is beyond me.
As you are using Bishop Strickland's bishop's title, why don't you address the Holy Father as Pope Francis?
@@georgesaguelton5751 I can remember that, at one time, everyone simply referred to the Pope as “the Pope”. In the same way as everyone simply referred to the Queen as “the Queen”. In fact, it is derogatory to add in the name of the person holding the office, as it means that we see them not in terms of the office which they hold, but as the named person sort of “filling in” for that office. So, for example, the press now almost always refers to the King as “King Charles” or even, sometimes, simply as “Charles” and the Pope is almost always referred to not as “the Pope” but as “Pope Francis”. Adding in the name actually derogates from the dignity of the holder of the office, in my view.
@@georgesaguelton5751 Do chill, sir. It was a mistake.
@@georgesaguelton5751 He's not worthy of it. Desperate prayer for him et aI.
@@georgesaguelton5751. Why don't you address his point instead of deflecting?
Thank you for your podcast! It has been extremely helpful on my journey to Catholicism.
A wonderful conversation! Full of faith!
You can be sure you have my support and my prayers!
Gavin, the “power, wisdom and authority” that the Church possesses is terribly undermined by this current pontificate and, regretfully, the priestly abuse scandal with its antecedents and current examples that cry to heaven for true retribution ! It does not change the truth of your position, (for there is no other institution) It only highlights the grave need for restoring Her relevance.
Great interview!
to Andrew Vavuris, plural "possesses" or singular 'progresses' or in uncertainty of belief keeps their inseparability and qualitative equality?
The Pope wrote to Bishop Strickland and informed him that he was being “relieved” of his position as Ordinary of the Diocese of Tyler. In fact, the Pope was quite prescient - Bishop Strickland is, in fact, from the sound of it, “relieved” not to be encumbered by all of the petty administrative tasks associated with being the Ordinary of a Diocese. He is free to do what I am sure that the Lord has, in fact, called him to do, act as a successor to the Apostles in boldly preaching the word of truth. I am sure that the Lord will provide him with all of the opportunities which he needs to enable him to fulfil his calling. If his enemies wished to use their influence in Rome to silence him, they may find that they are frustrated. Even if they did manage to silence him, the “very stones would cry out” as it is impossible to silence the Word of God, which will make itself heard by one means, if not by another.
Every time these wicked men “silence” a holy priest or bishop they only become more powerful and more widely heard.
That's very beautiful, about the Canadian woman.
only way forward is to go back and return to the TLM
Nonsense. To think that all problems can be solved by simply going back to the TLM are nonsense. So, if Pope Francis said the TLM, but then issued doubtful document after doubtful document, and hired pornographers to be head of the DDF, all problems would be solved?
Better to go back to the Orthodox Church
Rad trad nonsense. NO and TLM are two sides of the same coin. Don't forget the rites of the Uniate Churches either.
I say it every time….i love you guys!!! ❤
Profound...TY
Lovely show.
Thank You for having Bishop Strickland on.
We need more of you & him.🎉🎉🎉🎉
I agree with Bishop Strickland that whats is happening in our Church and in the wirld is demonic.
We support you Bishop Strickland
Blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in the law of the Lord. Blessed are they who search his testimonies: that seek him with their whole heart. For they that work iniquity, have not walked in his ways. Thou hast commanded thy commandments to be kept most diligently.
can you imagine as Cupich said the TLM is compromising the church. this is a true Mass celebrated for at least 1000 years. a true holy Mass this cardinal has just dissed!! 😮
@papadan
One might almost imagine Cupich and his ilk are inspired by the opposite of what they should be inspired by.
to papadan, "true" or 'in uncertainty believed'?
Fabulous. Thank you all. I hope to listen to this conversation a number of times. God bless
Loved this video, thank you.
Thanks!
Great discussion
😍💞 Bishop Strickland
Well received, Team Gavin Ashenden 😂❤
That man is simply holy
Simple faith. Beautiful.
_CCC 907_ "In accord with the knowledge, competence, and preeminence which they possess, [lay people] have the right and even at times a duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church, and they have a right to make their opinion known to the other Christian faithful, with due regard to the integrity of faith and morals and reverence toward their pastors, and with consideration for the common good and the dignity of persons."
Seeing a small part of our faith in action via this discussion was strengthening! Blessed be God forever!!
Unfortunately some of the discussions on this channel do not show appropriate respect for the Supreme Pontiff. Don't forget canon law 1404, The First See is judged by no one.
@@georgesaguelton5751 Have any of the panel made a judgement of PF? Have any of them expressed because of what PF is doing he is going to hell? Doesn't 1404 pertain to trials? In that context what is the relevance here to these discussions which are not trials?
I suggest watching all the programmes on this channel, especially Dr. Ashenden's opinions regarding the Holy Father. As a new Catholic Dr. Ashenden still has to leave behind his protestant past and accept canon law and catechism to the fullest.
@@georgesaguelton5751Notwithstanding I haven't watched all the episodes, your description of what DrGA has said are his opinions? Not judgements that condemn? If you could suggest the episode of his strongest opinion that would be helpful- please and thank you.
@@georgesaguelton5751 "Now when Peter had come to Antioch, I withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed;"
"But He turned and said to Peter, “Get behind Me, Satan! You are an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.”
This could be added to significantly, but you must know this already. God of course, judges all in the final judgement, which isn't what is going on here.
Acts 12 V 5 Peter thus was being kept in prison, but prayer by the church was fervently being made to God on his behalf. The pope needs our prayers. Jesus, Mary and Joseph we love you save souls, Save the consecrated, save the unborn and all the children of the world. Amen
We need to focus on Jesus in this unprecedented crisis of apostacy. Repent the kingdom of God is at hand. Salus animarum lex suprema. It's heartbreaking to see the the abysmal catechesis our catholic secondary schools.
Bishop Strickland is the perfect model of what a Catholic bishop should be. Pope Francis is the perfect model of what a Pope must not be.
That's a grave sin on your behalf.
Now you know.
Wolfthequarrelsome, so good of you and Satan to comment!@@Kitiwake
Protestant private judgement and blatant disrespect towards the Holy Father have no place in the Holy Catholic Church. Canon law 212 and 1404.
You certainly have no idea what you are talking about, Mr. Protestant. @@georgesaguelton5751
@@KitiwakeHow so?
To have supernatural faith is to have encountered the Holy Spirit in all his glorious truth and charity, and to have allowed him to inhabit the soul. Many people have travelled a way along the path of Christian understanding and believe they are sincere Christians, but haven’t been transformed by this supernatural faith. At least that’s how it seems to be to me.
Amen. You are 100% right! Without divine transformation of the soul by the Holy Spirit, you are not saved at all. Too many Christians in name only, in this generation.
An honour to have the beautiful Bishop Strickland. Yet again the Pope will be missing in action i.e. won't be celebrating Holy Thursday publicly this year. Is it even possible for the Vicar of Christ (a title he has struck off) to not be present at Christ's institution of the priesthood? Could you look into the theological, spiritual implications of this in a future podcast? 🙏 If at all possible.
We are in the revelation times
I recall what Jesus said to Saint Faustyna, recorded in the Diary, "You are my secretary for the second coming."
Makes one think. She died in 1937.
What a holy and humble Bishop. Inspiring.
The demise of the Old Rite Triduum at St Mary Moorfields is a very sad development. I don't think Cardinal Nichols is the real villain of the piece. I suspect he didn't seek permission for it to continue because he knew Cardinal Roach would say no. Thank heavens the latter is of an age such that he won't be appointed as Cardinal Nichols' successor at Westminster.
Even if an angel from heaven preach a different gospel, let him be accursed
This is such a difficult time, what is wrong with our Pope? He seems to be almost amoral, is that even possible?
Milktoast and being made to feel guilty.
This just reminds me of Ezekiel 13:22
“Because with lies you have made the heart of the righteous sad, whom I have not made sad; and you have strengthened the hands of the wicked, so that he does not turn from his wicked way to save his life.
The Warning to false prophets Ezekiel 13 and 14 and Jeremiah 23. I sure this could be added from the warning by Our Lady, The letters to the seven churches, the warnings in the epistles and those by Our Lord Himself in the gospels.
Remember what Jesus Christ told us. In the end time's stay close to me. Yes the world will be dark and war's and even increase do not be afraid and do not focus to much on this world but on me.( Book of Matthew ). it's time to focus on heaven. This is a prophecy what must be for filled. Like in the book of jude We must keep Faith because there will be a time were the church doors are shut! So closeness to God, Jesus Christ the holy spirit and the mother will be crucial. The kingdom of God is inside us. ❤❤❤
At the end of time we no doubt will see every kind of disaster we've seen throughout history, including division in the Church.
Amen ❤️ 🙏
First of all thank you for the time and trouble you go to make these videos it is very much appreciated. Also I agree with all you are saying. I was just wondering if you have read the life of Papa Frankie and the many strange events that occur therein. For instance from an early age his parents appear simply to have stopped talking to him. Also the fact that he behaved so horribly as Provincial of the Jesuits in Argentina he had to be moved to Germany? Also reports of his terrible temper , rants and autocratic behaviour in the Vatican?
A lot of these it seems to me is of one who is totally diabolically possessed by the devil. In psychological terms we might speak of Narcisssstc sociopathic behaviour. Do you ever wonder if we dealing with the Satanic?
Please Gavin I had my Illumination of Conscience last year. Found out I had unknowingly committed incest in 1982 got Cancer in 1984. So King is ill probably doesn't even know about Rave at Canterbury Cathedral but as He is ultimately Head of C of E is guilty before God. Obviously Justin Welby more so. Please Gavin you like Moses who knew Pharaoh. You know King as former chaplain to His Majesty's late beloved mum. I can't see Queen turning a blind eye to Raves in Naves. Just because King doesn't know about these Raves doesn't let Him off hook in God's eyes. I want His Majesty to recover ASAP. Also Kate. I am praying for them both 🙏
Please do all you can to reach King Gavin. Mitigate Great Chastisement.
You like Queen Esther had your position for such a time of this. God bless you Gavin. I just returned to Catholic Church in 2018. But spent 30 years before that telling World a Catholic Prophecy many thanks A
P.S. If the church is taking on water and going down, I think it wise not to lock yourself in a cabin below decks. My two cents.
I think you’ll find that one of the reasons that we are Catholics is because we believe in the promise of Peter to Jesus, that the gates of hell will not prevail against the church that he has founded. So your image of the Church, taking on water and going down is not the one that we share. Instead, like all faithful Catholics down the ages where the bride of Christ is threatened, we rush to defend her, and if necessary, and if we have enough courage, to give our lives for her. The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church. The only thing that’s going down are those who repudiate the living Christ, as they will discover at the moment of judgement.
Is it possible at some point you could do a video about penance and penitents?
Thank you.
Yes, thank you for the suggestion 🙏
Matthew 18:15-17
I don’t know why, but that full screen of Mark at 23:44 made me laugh 😂
Shout out to catacomb Christians!
Bishop Strickland was actually criticized by someone in the hierarchy for talking about the Magisterium too much!
We need to study scripture The Lord Gods Holy word and see where our church has diverted from faith of the Apostles
Not strong enough!!
Long before the Commonwealth, Sir Edward Coke (Lord Chief Justice) gave his now famous opinion “The King is subject to no man, but is subject to God and the Law.” King Charles I lost his head as a result of disregarding this advice. The Pope is not above Canon Law, nor is he above the rules of natural justice, in particular, “hear the other side”. In removing Bishop Strickland without providing him with an opportunity to be heard, the Pope acted contrary to the rules of natural justice. Bishop Strickland is being too kind and charitable in this respect. While there is no one competent to prevent the Pope from acting contrary to Canon Law and contrary to the rules of natural justice, that does not mean that his behaviour should be condoned, or any attempt made to justify it. Quite simply, the enemies of Bishop Strickland, other members of the Bishops’ Conference, used their influence (in particular their ability to raise large sums of money to bail out the Vatican finances which are in a parlous state at present) to lean on the Pope to persuade him to act contrary to Canon Law and to the rules of natural justice. However, all things do work together for the good - this behaviour on the part of the Pope does make obvious to all his true character and does serve to release Bishop Strickland from the constraints to which he was subject as Ordinary of a Diocese. Perhaps Bishop Strickland and others concerned about the direction in which this Papacy is heading are right to stand back and accept the way in which the Pope is behaving - as the old adage says, “give him enough rope and he will hang himself.” Christian Charity, of course, does call upon us all to point out to the Pope where he is going wrong. We must pray that he will repent and turn from his ways. Naturally, for the sake of his immortal soul, I do hope and pray that he will do so. God does not desire anyone to be lost - neither do I, nor does any true Christian.
Regarding sex education, it might have been Peter Hitchens who reported that those who first imposed such education on schools, had as their, later admittted, objective, to undermine the family.
I am not interested in the new church Francis is creating.... the shutting down of the traditional teachings and liturgy is a heinous act to force the faithful into accepting the modernization of our faith with heretical changes and proposed changes.... I will continue walking up the hill to the foot of the cross on Calvery....
How can you feel isolated if one has the Eucharist?
Long experience has taught me that "experts", especially on children, are the very worst source for anything.
I don’t know what you mean. I was a great expert and perfect parent until I had kids.
I do not mind removing statues and just replace them with pictures and leave the cross as it is, do not get me wrong, I am catholic. It is said we should not blown down and pray to them ( statues)
There have been Popes who have been good, bad and indifferent across the centuries. Sometimes, a historical perspective helps us to see the bigger picture. Just thought!
According to Aquinas (Summa Th. prima secundae, Q90, A4) every law is "an ordinance of reason for the common good, made by him who has care of the community, and promulgated".
Was the papal ordinance restricting the celebration of the TLM made for the common good?
Its stated purpose was to hinder "disunity".
What kind of disunity? Not any and every kind.
Only the disunity consisting of a church divided into one part of which adheres to pre-conciliar theology and another which does not.
In reality it is not disunity that Francis wanted to eliminate. It is adherence to the pre-conciliar theology.
If Francis merely wanted unity he could just as well have banned the novus ordo.
Can the removal of adherence to the pre-conciliar theology be for the common good? No. Just the opposite.
Vatican II sanctioned no change in theology. Its decrees were issued on the understanding that they were not doctrinally binding.
Can Francis honestly (but mistakenly) believe that restricting the celebration of the TLM serves the common good? Only if he is an ignoramus or a complete idiot.
He is neither.
Therefore neither in fact nor in intention did Traditiones Custodes contain an ordinance of reason "for the common good".
Therefore it contains no law.
Therefore it contains nothing binding in conscience.
Papal authority has its limits.
Silly question. Katherine where did you get the frames for your prints? What size is the opening? Can only find 5.5" x 5.5" opening. Will sacred heart fit within it?
Not silly at all. I got these from Dunelm and they are 14x14” to hold 10x8” or 25.4 x 20.3 cm
Elijah and Jesus entered heaven in two very different ways, or had two very different ends to their earthly lives (though Jesus of course is still here in the Eucharist, etc.) How will the Church end? One would prefer the end of Elijah, but we might get the end of Jesus.
Regarding your technical issues, have you used the Umbrellino Prayer?
we had people in the Catholic Church teaching our kids that it was fine and inevitable that they would have sex before marriage--in a confirmation class!
I also disagree about TLM mass removed
galvin left the COE and joined Rome. when he got to Rome, he found out that the same forces were at work. its called politics. the coe was always a fudge. the papacy was always a political problem.
Can you add a link to Ad Demos 2?
Vatican has gone woke
Ok, I really appreciate your channel but many of the things in this piece have made me wonder why on earth you don't have Father James Mawdsley on your channel. Truth, beauty, deep theological knowledge, very apparent love and holiness and he be is only in Lancaster area.
If the Pope is considered to the Supreme lawgiver, then why does he operate outside of established Canon Law? All laws of any sort, appropriate areas of morality. Some of his documents and expressed opinions are clearly outside of morality and outside of the principles of natural law. So why can't he be challenged in his role as Supremes lawgiver, where he steps outside of ethical and moral behaviour and the principles of natural law?
Are you a canon lawyer that you can definitively say that?
Canon law 1404, The First See is judged by no one. So who are you to judge the Pope with your own private judgment like a protestant?
@@georgesaguelton5751 a curious Catholic. That's who. Some of the things that are happening are immoral. There is an implied presumption in the normal worlf, that anybody who holds a position or office of responsibility should be a fit and proper person and if, as in this case, their behaviour or value systems are at odds with the long established Catholic theology, then they're are obviously the wrong person for the office. And they should go, or politely be asked to leave or set up their own schismatic new version of the Church away from the present Church.
@@Kitiwake not a canon lawyer, but a person with legal training and background and therefore am extremely interested in this question. I prefer answers, not more irrelevant questions.
@@georgesaguelton5751and who are you to blindly accept everything? A Vatican staff member or Vatican loyalist? I prefer to think about issues from various angles, not just accept unquestioningly what is being pushed under my nose.
CHOOSE SPIRITUALITY IF YOU WANT THE FREEDOM THAT THE DIVINE BRINGS
CHOOSE NON-DOGMATIC THEISM/NON-DOGMATIC FAITH IF YOU WANT COMMUNITY WITHOUT SPIRITUAL OR RELIGIOUS COERCION
WHERE DO YOU THINK THIS VIDEO FALLS ON THE DOGMATIC THEISM/DOGMATIC FAITH/RELIGION vs NON-DOGMATIC THEISM/NON-DOGMATIC FAITH/RELIGION SPECTRUM?
Pope Paul "The smoke of Satan has entered the church through a crack."
I suspect Pope Francis is "going after the lost one and leaving the 99 in the wilderness." Not fun for those in the wilderness.
He's not MY holy father and I'm not under HIS authority. Grow up.
Your not a Catholic then.
No, there waits Pride and the snares of the enemy. 'Be as little children'.
Satan is the author of confusion
This is the whiner’s club.
Pope Francis has definitely downplayed theology and belief.
Going in the wrong direction ……sorry.
Bp. Strickland lost me when he said “Judeo-Christian”, such a shame.
Kyrie eleison
✝️
❤️🔥
The OT or the Torah is the first five books of the Hebrew Bible The Catholic Bible is made up of the Torah and the MT. The Catholic Bible has more books than the Protestant Bible. There is plenty of information on line. The Holy Family were Jews. Jesus, Mary and Joseph. The Rosary the Joyful Mysteries Mary brings Jesus to the Temple at eight days old and the last mystery of the Joyful Mysteries Mary finds the 12 year old Jesus talking with the Rabbis in the Temple.
The holy family of Jesus, Mary, and Joseph were Jews. The Joyful Mysteries of the Holy Rosary when Jesus is eight days old Mary and Joseph take him to the Temple the last mystery Mary finds Jesus at 12 years old talking with the Rabbis. The Catholic Bible is made up of the OT and NT. Father James Mawdsley's book Adam's Deep Sleep. The Passion of JC prefigured in the OT is excellent on this.
nicely put!@@marygunning5121
@@marygunning5121 yes thank you I am aware Jesus and all his family and friends were Jews. I love and want Jews to convert them to Jesus that said this term of “Judeo-Christian” is a Protestant word to ecumenise with Jews as an act of dispensationalism . Fr. Mawdsley is clear that to be a Christian is to abandon Judaism and the Talmudic/rabbinic laws that they worship and live by which are not biblical, further evidenced in Michael Hoffmann’s books.
This old covenant ended when Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit in Mary. The Jews who became Jesus’ disciples eschewed the old laws and renounced all Jewish ties for the sake of Jesus. Judaism is wholly anti-Christ to adopt this chimerical word into Catholic vocabulary is wrong to say the least. St. Paul went on to preach that there is no Jew or gentile in Christ. The New Testament is full of examples of Jesus and his disciples denouncing the Pharisees and their followers, they were tasked to convert all the world including Jews.
“Judeo-Christian” was designed with the intent to give dispensation to the Pharisees. Which is heresy. For they had him killed and rejected him. This is the legacy that modern Judaism has inherited through the rabbis and their Talmud and magic book the Zohar and it is fully anti-Christ.
@@seanjones1020 Thank you very much for this information I was unaware that Judeo-Christian is a Protestant word to ecumenise with the Jews as an act of dispensationalism. I did not know that. So much to learn.
Supreme law giver is God, not a Pope who teaches the opposite of God moral laws
I'm so disappointed to see Gavin here.
I had quite liked him and was delighted that he converted to the full truth.
But it appears once a protestant, always one. He doesn't know his place.
How so?
Neither, in that sense, did Catherine of Sienna. And she wasn't a Protestant.
Indeed, canon law 212 affirms that lay people have the right, indeed at times the duty, in keeping with their knowledge, competence and position, to manifest to the sacred Pastors their views on matters which concern the good of the Church. They have the right also to make their views known to others of Christ’s faithful, but in doing so they must always respect the integrity of faith and morals, show due reverence to the Pastors and take into account both the common good and the dignity of individuals.
Gavin is the voice of reason and balance and highly intelligent. I like listening to him because he is calm, rational and never petty or vindictive. He frequently is extremely witty, and all in all makes for an excellent commentator. More, please.
@@georgesaguelton5751You seem to have no problem when the Holy Father fails to respect the integrity of faith and morals. When was blind obedience ever Catholic? Is there anything Pope Francis could do which you would criticise?
Bishop Strickland seems to be running around like a chicken in all media platforms that take him in.
That's very uncharitable. I doubt he is asking to be interviewed. It is much more likely that people are asking to interview him and, to our great benefit, he accepts the inviation. I think you need to consider why so many "media platforms" want to interview him.
Unlike Cardinal Dolan, who’s said nothing in public after that “funeral?” Or any Catholic bishops when Fr. Martin had the NYT feature his “blessings?” Or when the “Sister of Perpetual Indulgence” were honored at an MLB game? Or any of the numerous instances that cause scandal and confusion?
That’s just rude. All it does is to expose the malevolence of the heart. Have you thought about reconsidering how much thoughtless malice you carry? You can be free of it if you want.
Right. Anyway , there were plenty of reasons to remove Strickland. Why do people act as if they are confused and can’t understand why. Disobedience is a reason good enough.
Dear Beanie, Red Beanie (verse 4 of 8)
(To the tune of “Dear Abby” by John Prine)
ua-cam.com/video/LJVFY_LX9Ik/v-deo.html
Dear Beanie, Red Beanie,
out of both sides he talks,
celebrates his New Ordo in a great big old box.
He don’t like Church teaching on natural law,
cause it says that pervies can’t lay a lecherous paw.
Sy-ynd, LA-Traddie.
LA-Traddie, LA-Traddie,
y’aint got no complaint.
He is what he is and he ain’t what he ain’t.
The Catechism states that it’s a disordered life,
but the SCOTUS says OK, you can make him your wife.
But we’re still dialoging.