B&H & Camera Canada keep showering you with love lately! And you Mark, you are grabbing the chance to the maximum churning out content after content for maximum growth!
I really can't understand why Sony hasn't released a EVF for the ZV-E10. With the intelligent hot shoe I'm pretty sure they could. They could also improve the menu system to be touch screen enabled. I've always thought that just having touch focus is such a waste of a touch screen. Canon menu system and touch screen has always been superior in my opinion. I've mentioned before that I bought a 90D not long after I bought the ZV-E10 and I much prefer the general usage of that camera even if I still can not afford to buy the lenses that I want for it. I'm glad you are doing more than just Sony reviews now. Canon has been my favourite manufacturer for many years but I'm always willing to experience other systems hence why I bought the ZV-E10
yes - I love them all. Panasonic is a big favourite of mine but Sony just works. I get the shots I need with Sony. but I’m really liking the Canon cameras lately, especially the R5C I’ve been trying out.
At about 0:52 I started drooling when you held up the Canon R5C. That is one camera that has caught my eye on multiple occasions. I am looking forward to your review of that camera. I've seen other reviews of it. But, I'm sure yours will be the handsome-ist one of them all.
I’m a nutshell here is my review - it’s a full canon cinema camera without the ND filters. It’s amazing but it’s autofocus in video isn’t perfect. If you wanted one off the best photo cameras in the world AND a cinema cam for shooting pro work like documentaries - there’s nothing like it.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Sounds good. For me it comes down to do I want to spend $700 more for the C70 which has built in ND filters, or go with the R5C. Tough choice.
@@AllThingsFilm1 it is a really tough choice. For video I’d lean toward the c70 for battery life and ND and button layout (and a little better dynamic range). BUT the R5C is full frame and an amazing photo camera.
Heyo Mark! Left a comment a couple of days ago about the possible issue with the use of the hotshoe on the ZV-E10 while using the Smallrig Cage. I splundered and got myself a Doug + the cage. Needless to say, Smallrig updated their cage! It now has a notch in the NATO rail at the top, so the hotshoe is again fully functional!
Hi Mark i have just purchased the R10, thanks for a great video. i had been using a canon 80d for about 3 years. I was going to step up to 90d, but sales lady recommended the R10, said lighter, has more fps, and canon really pushing wildlife, so have the animal tracking auto focus. I had my trusty 100-400mm mk2 on 80d all the time, and used my 700d for other lenses. I didnt want to spend nearly £3000 on the R7. Not had a chance to test R10 properly, just a few photos of birds on feeder at full range. Was impresssd with EVF, and the colours straight out of camera on AV. Have looked at a video re settings. So my first mirrorless. I guess my main concern is R10 has no dust or weather sealing, p Will have to be careful re battery shots lot less, but purchased a spare. So will have to be careful. Hopefully made the right choice over 90d, and first mirrorless camera. Off to a zoo next week to try it out
The 100-400 II is a great fit for the R10/R7, basically the same or even better than the RF 100-500L. I was the most impressed as i saw how good the IBIS of the R7 and the 100-400 II work together, nearly as good (or as good) as the RF 100-500. I saw in vacation the R7 for a similar price i would pay where im coming from for a R10 so i just hoped its not a bad deal and at least does what the EOS RP is incapable of. And it wasnt, after 2 months i even sold my full frame camera, the R7 is good enough to be the main camera.
Hello, I need to shoot a video of the assembly of the constructor (shoot many, many hours) from a distance of about 2 meters. Take off your hands as you collect small parts. Canon P10 with 18-45 mm suits me. ? Thank you.
I am unsure if I should get Canon R10 or Fuji XS10?? I loved everything about canon except the lenses availability, also I loved the Fuji part except the Autofocus and Battery. Ughhh! tough decision!
Hey Mark! I've recently been binging all of your ZV-E10 video's (as a lot of others probably do), and you've been making some great content for that. Love the way you manage to keep me entertained and informed at the same time! I had a question about your setup in the ZV-E10 Rig Build video you made back in November! I've heard and seen some complaints online how the hot shoe on the ZV-E10 is blocked due to the Smallrig Cage. Have you got any recommendations on getting any type of hotshoe extention with that specific build? (or do you maybe have intel on a V2 edition of that Smallrig Cage?) Nevertheless, keep up the great content!
Hey Mark love the content, planning to get my first camera. I’m into short films and cinematography so what camera should i get? SONY ZVE-10 or Canon r10?
‘Ditch diggin vlogs’…have yet to watch one yet! Nicely done video! Seems like a reasonable camera, but still looks like the Sony zV E10 might be the better choice if just new to market. Hopefully we will see the Fuji comparison soon! Looks like Henry’s has in stock.
Just a question... do you enjoy it? I began with RF 800 and full frame camera (really enjoyed it, just wanted sometimes more than 800mm), but as i was going to the R7 and so effective 1280mm... OUCH! I instantly looked for a zoom lens and ended up with the Sigma 150-600C which is MUCH MORE ENJOYABLE than the RF 800 (and was cheaper). The RF 800 is an awesome lens, especially well stabilized and light for 800mm, but on APS-C its just too much often and the F11 doesnt allow for proper, sharp wildlife photography in the woods for example, at best video with 1/30 to 1/60 shutter speed. The Sigma give me 240-960mm uncropped (for 4kfine and 120 fps slowmo), in 4k60 crop video something like 400-1700mm. Also its a lot brighter (so lower ISO or higher SS) than the RF 800 F11 with 6.3, just the weight is a bit of a dealbreaker for hiking where i still love the RF 800.
@@harrison00xXx Hey, I ended up getting the 600 f11. It was on sale ($595) and I thought it would maximize the convenience factor while still having enough reach on an apsc camera. I really enjoy it, it is far lighter which makes birding a lot more relaxing. I can hang the setup by the camera strap around my neck and the pictures look great. One thing I noticed is that when the light levels are low the frame rate in the viewfinder dips which makes it harder to track things but that's part of the tradeoff in having the f11 aperture.
Thanks for mentioning the eos rp cause not many see that as a good option even if you just need a camera for some casual hobby photography. Looking forward to a review of the Fujifilm x-s10 :D
Excellent review as always! Another YT'er said you can download a free cinetone thingy for getting something similar to C-log for grading, not that I would know 1st-hand.
Hey Mark, I've been binging your content and I am still deciding whether to get the R10 or the ZV-E10. Both seem to be very good hybrid cameras. What would you reccommend for a beginner who is getting into photography/videography to get. This camera will be mostly used for recreational activities but I want it to be kinda future proof as I can use it for the next 5-7 years.
the r10 is probably better for someone who wants photos as well as video. There aren't a lot of lenses available right now - but that will change in the nest couple of years.
Hi Mark, I have a very specific question: I need a camera that can shoot 10 bit 4:2:2 4K video, unlimited (or at least for 3 hours uninterrupted) while plugged to USB-C. I was thinking between GH5II and R10. Did you test the R10 video recording with usb power on? Canon website says it has 2 hours limit.
I really don’t know - but Canon clearly does not want viltrox to sell any products for their cameras. Which is a shame. Canon says viltrox infringes in their “patents”
10-bit is only available in HDR unfortunately. The dynamic range is not great on the camera, but 10-bit gives you a lot of colour to work with so you can colour grade it well.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis In the alley, you were on the 35MM or 50MM? I don't see a link to the 35MM lens in your links. Is the 4K unlimited record time? I was looking at the Z30, but worried the record time limit could be problematic. I'll need to rewatch your comparison.
@@JustinPulitzerTrades I'm going out to shoot low light right now, if you have discord I can answer all of your questions better than typing cuz my hand is a bit broken right now.
Im torn between this R10 with a 50mm 1.8 RF and a zv e10 with a sigma 30mm f1.4 lens for videos what do you recommend as this shoots 10bit which may be easier to grade and fix in post.. Also the zebras and wb is a bummer on this unless canon has updated this
Did you use your usual LUT when filming? It would be cool if you could show us how video from this Canon looks in its Standard color mode so we could easily compare colors between Canons, Nikons and Sonys :)
I will be doing zv-E10 vs r10 and I’ll be sure to include that. But if you check out my video comparing the Nikon, Sony, and Two canons for video - you can see it. It’s the section at the beginning that’s says all automatic settings. Those are the standard colors coming out of camera
If you need autofocus - I would go with a Sony A7C. If you want the best camera for video with pro video features, I would get the Panasonic S5 (but you will have to manually focus - which most people do in short films). If you want the best budget option so that you can get a nice lens - I would get the Panasonic GH5 with the Sigma 16mm 1.4 (again - you will have to manually focus),
If you lose wedding photos, it's not the bride you have to fear -- it's her mother! Reviewers tend to overlook one of the R10's best features, at least for us old DSLR shooters -- control joystick!
Hi Mark. The pic of guy walking in your studio looks kind of dark. Not sure if it’s the R10 or your lighting. The outside shots looked great though. I hate the R10’s product page on the Canon site. It’s so boring when compared to the Nikon Z30’s web site. It’s basically just a list of specs. At least I get the info I needed from your great review!! 😎
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Sorry, I meant the “pic of you talking in the studio looks kind of dark.” I have Grammarly on my phone, and it loves to change words around.
ah - haha - the background is a bit darker because I only have an f2.8 and I normally shoot with an f2. so the light on my face is the same. but the background will be dimmer because of the brighter key light,
I currently have an olympus em10 0riginal with a lumix 20mm f1:8 lnes. I photograph urban landscape to make oil paintings ,; I am a proffesional artist . However, I need a lens that is slightly wider than a 20mm , and I am hoping to buy a Canon r10 body . what would you recommend to go with the r10 body please. I have been on the canon photo sites on Farcebook, but all I got was ridicule for choosing an R10. I am strictly a photographer, video means absolutely nothin to me . Thankyou in advance> Jase
The problem with the R10, including for photos, is lens selection. To get something wider than a 20 (which is 40mm full frame equivalent) - in the Canon R - lineup - you have almost no options. The 16mm 2.8 (which is a full frame equivalent 26mm on the R10) is about the only thing you can get. And it's not a great lens. 2.8 isn't great in lowlight and the lens is only ok. There is a 24 1.8 which is much better - but it's much more expensive and gives a full frame equiv with the R10 of 38mm which is not much compared to what you have. So the only other option is the 15-35 f2.8 - which is huge and over $2000. This is currently the problem Canon has. You simply cannot buy R-Mount lenses suited for their smaller, lower priced cameras. You can buy an adapter and look for EF glass - which is what some people are doing.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Thankyou so much for your response. I am in no particular rush , I am just going to wait then because I am nervous at the costs of lenses , and the limited options at the moment . Thankyou for your help. I will keep watching your channel and saving up .
Not sure why the advertised 23 fps with electronic shutter is dismissed with the "you'll probably never need it and the 15 fps mechanical shutter works". Many of us who are looking for mirrorless are weighing heavily on electronic shutter capability. 15 fps mechanical shutter and any number ELECTRONIC shutter fps are 2 different things, particulary if the camera was bought with the expectation to rely on the electronic shutter. So, at what fps rate does the electronic shutter operate. And why are they even still showing on their advertising paperwork something that would be a major "pro", but obviously doesn't work.
Fast electronic shutter performance doesn't matter if the rolling shutter isn't good. Sure you'll get 23 fps - but chances are you're shooting something that requires a burst, like a moving subject. And that moving subject will be slanted or bent strangely because of the poor rolling shutter. This does not happen in mechanical shutter. Race cars, sports, wildlife - all will be warped with electronic shutter on the R10.
Meh. If you have an M50 and a few lenses, then "trading up" to the R10 means selling the good lenses and going to a system with a total of 4, mostly painfully slow, autofocus lenses. I don't see the advantage. (Although I don't do video at all.) I think I'll stick with my M50 until Canon either catches up, with a few fast primes (I mean "fast" like f1.8) or f4 or f2.8 zooms, OR Canon allows third party lenses. If Canon doesn't support this system with useful lenses, then Fuji or Sony would be happy to fill the gap.
Yeah, EF-M users are pretty fked, thats true. I always though like this about EF-S users when they realized Canon want to force their customers sooner or later to full frame and then they had a ton of garbage EF-S glass. A problem i completely avoided by just going for the full frame lenses and if possible higher end than lower end (and 2nd hand to make it affordable) And why are the RF system haters always complaining about missing RF APS-C lenses... yeah it sucks, but damn, EF-S still exists, something i would see as BONUS POINT (because of the Meike EF RF filter adapter!). Except for a 50mm 1.8 and a RF 800 F11 i just prefer EF(-S) lenses, with zooms its less of a problem to adapt lenses than with compact primes where the EF RF adapter gets bigger than the lens itself. Thankfully many EF-S 17-55 2.8s still exist, probably one of the best (and affordable!) fits to any APS-C canon. At least i love it on my R7
And if you are really that heavy into proper lenses... just get a speedbooster and use better, bigger aperture full frame glass... voila your APS-C is pretty much awesome and full frame like!
The m50 is great - but if you want good 4k and to move to canon's new system - then this is the way to go. I personally think the m50 still has a place and it's lenses right now are still better in my opinion
M series is dead and no camera models and lenses will be developed for the system. No point in buying a M50 in 2022 unless you are dead sure its current M series lenses can 100% suit your needs because there will be none coming in the horizon. And also, resale value will be meh due to the said reasons.
It depends, if you are mostly a photo fan well the M50 is a way better deal since it's basicaly as good with great AF, 11 FPS in burst and also 24 megapixel for way cheaper. But as soon as you want some good 4K... the M50 just vanish ^^
@@gigihanmandarin what lenses does the Rf-s system have to wow someone coming from m50? Also what 3rd party lenses will be available? ohh thats right... no 3rd party lenses will ever be availible.
My m50 with canon ef-m 22 and 32 with the sigma 56 mm is a beast for photos and 1080 video! I’m getting an r10 with the rf 35 mm to start! Never parting with my m-50
@@pankajmandal522 I got at vacation in moldawia the R7 (new, in a photo store, with warranty...) nearly for the price i would have paid for the R10 in the EU I would go for the RP if you are really on a budget and dont care too much about video or animal eye af, or if you really want a hybrid camera, i would just step up directly at the R7, just avoid the R10 (basically too cheaped out, much more than the R7). The RP is at least only cheaped out at the video features, speed and partially by using an "old" 6D II sensor. I would have never thought about the R7 , let alone the R10 (i hated on them because of the price), but as i saw this deal i first calculated, watched, calculated again, asked... and well i had the R7 in my hands pretty fast. During vacation i saw already coming that the R7 will replace my (for over 2 years...) loved EOS RP. Whats another interesting option to think about: What about the R10 or RP, depending on your ACTUAL NEEDS and in the future a 2nd hand R10 or RP whatever you dont have yet, they share the same battery and are as RP+R7 combination very good fitting to each other (the one is a full frame photography camera, the other one a faster video and crop sensor camera) The biggest issue with canon... if you want a good all in one package, you need to get a R5 or R6 Mk2 and to get the full potential out of them you also need overpriced RF glass.
I wanted to be a fan of this camera, but it's just not good enough for the price. I'd rather buy a eos Rp or Fuji S X10 or XT3 all day over this, and the Sony ZV e 10 and Nikon Z30 both have better IQ, IMO. Most videos I've seen taken with the R10 have been soft and noisy especially if the lighting isn't Optimal. It's probably a better photography camera but for video I'd pass. Another great Video Mark
I feel like the R7 is a better value myself even though that’s pretty expensive. Because, like you said, the RP exists for photos for most people, and for video, cameras like the ZV-E10 offer an excellent value. and hybrid - the Xs10 or other fujis make a lot of sense. Bsaically, I totally agree with you. 😂
Same here. For non-action photography, I would lean towards the z50, dynamic range often seems better with Nikon cameras. Also, it’s considerably less expensive. For video or sports/birding, the Canon cameras all the way. No stabilization like my m43 cameras and weak APS-C selection has me thinking about a used XH-1 or XS-10, but at some point I’m going to get a Z5 so idk. 🤷♂️
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis The Fujifilm camera that you mentioned- I was thinking about that one and the XT-4 as a possible way forward from the EF-M system. I’ve heard many positive things about these two and the X-system as a whole. They seem to have a great lens selection at reasonable prices. I am only afraid of their autofocus. From what reviewers are saying it’s not even in the ballpark with Sony’s and Canon’s. I’d love to watch a comparison review.
Seems the M Mount has been dead for a while I think this confirms it! I do like the unified mount system but as you mentioned there may be no 3rd part lenses for the R Mount. I hope that's not true but even so the EF lenses available are pretty darn good. Let's see what Canon can do with the RF crop lenses. I have the R7 and love it so far. Cheers.
Is Dougie OK? I hope he's logged out and doesn't hear you compare him to these new fangled heretics. But, as always a very good review in layman's terms... Oh! I'm not saying your videos aren't as detailed as like... Um...(Gerald)... But seriously...well done. Your reviews are very good for people that might actually buy and use these products vs. just pretend to be thinking about buying them. Like me. Thanks again Mark, I'm looking forward to buying one of your T shirts...
The Canon r10 is the cheapest option - but there are still no-good lenses available for Canon APS-C - Sigma is coming out with some great ones this year for Canon though. amzn.to/3VmnO3Y
Plz bring Sigma 28-70 full video on zve10...... U can't leave this sexy beast..... Zve10 family is waiting for this. And if possible do side by side comparison with Sigma 18-50
Massive dislike, totally unsubscribed :P That lens selection really kills Canon in this case but certainly they'll fix it before long. Makes the FF Canon more compelling unless you specifically need a cheap body or perhaps a B or C cam, then this R10 can really fit the bill. Seems to give some great output and I'm sure the colours are solid unless it's low light
Sony really have to update their APSC lineup. The 6000 series cameras are obsolete and the ZVE10 is not for photography. Basically I can't recommend a good budget Sony camera for somebody, the R10 and R7 is just better.
I completely disagree. While Sony a6000 series are getting long in the tooth, their native apsc lens selection is vastly superior since it actually already exists. Glass is way more important than the body imo. Given Canon’s priors with apsc glass release (both with EF-S and EF-M), it’s begging for serious frustration to trust they will deliver this time with RF-M. And if they do, how long will it take ? and at what price ? And Canon have recently confirmed they won’t allow 3rd parties to develop RF lenses. That doesn’t bode well at all. On the other hand, with the recent release of the FX-30, it’s pretty clear that new photography and hybrid apsc bodies are around the corner for Sony. I absolutely love my M6 mk ii, but the lack of native long telephoto and quality fast zooms, finally made me get a Dougie + the sigma 18-50 f2.8 + sony 70-350. I’m keeping my M6 for sentimental reasons and I genuinely love the tactile feeling of shooting with it; but the E-mount got me with these 2 lenses: i love their IQ and compact sizes. It’s a great travel/hiking lineup (will be perfect once I get the 11 f1.8). I’m waiting a bit to see if an update to the a6400 is coming out for xmas or I’d be happy with an EVF accessory for the zv-e10. Otherwise I still think the A6400 is the best value for money apsc, even 3 years later.
you really are looking for negativity where there isn’t any. the canon cameras are great but the lens selection is not. I point out pros and cons of all cameras on the channel. I’m not going to say a camera is perfect when it isn’t.if you watch the other reviews, you will see I point out the negatives of the Sony, Fuji, Nikon, Panasonic and Olympus cameras. It’s ok to like canon - I do as well - but you have to look at cameras objectively and take the good with the bad,
B&H & Camera Canada keep showering you with love lately! And you Mark, you are grabbing the chance to the maximum churning out content after content for maximum growth!
At the expense of my sanity!! Just kidding. It's great - but I am pretty busy
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis we all have 24hrs and we all need to choose where we spend those 24hrs on.
I really can't understand why Sony hasn't released a EVF for the ZV-E10. With the intelligent hot shoe I'm pretty sure they could. They could also improve the menu system to be touch screen enabled. I've always thought that just having touch focus is such a waste of a touch screen. Canon menu system and touch screen has always been superior in my opinion. I've mentioned before that I bought a 90D not long after I bought the ZV-E10 and I much prefer the general usage of that camera even if I still can not afford to buy the lenses that I want for it. I'm glad you are doing more than just Sony reviews now. Canon has been my favourite manufacturer for many years but I'm always willing to experience other systems hence why I bought the ZV-E10
yes - I love them all. Panasonic is a big favourite of mine but Sony just works. I get the shots I need with Sony. but I’m really liking the Canon cameras lately, especially the R5C I’ve been trying out.
Great Video, I don´t know why but i couldn´t find it in any of my searches, just found it by chance in the recomendations ...
At about 0:52 I started drooling when you held up the Canon R5C. That is one camera that has caught my eye on multiple occasions. I am looking forward to your review of that camera. I've seen other reviews of it. But, I'm sure yours will be the handsome-ist one of them all.
I’m a nutshell here is my review - it’s a full canon cinema camera without the ND filters. It’s amazing but it’s autofocus in video isn’t perfect. If you wanted one off the best photo cameras in the world AND a cinema cam for shooting pro work like documentaries - there’s nothing like it.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Sounds good. For me it comes down to do I want to spend $700 more for the C70 which has built in ND filters, or go with the R5C. Tough choice.
@@AllThingsFilm1 it is a really tough choice. For video I’d lean toward the c70 for battery life and ND and button layout (and a little better dynamic range). BUT the R5C is full frame and an amazing photo camera.
Heyo Mark! Left a comment a couple of days ago about the possible issue with the use of the hotshoe on the ZV-E10 while using the Smallrig Cage. I splundered and got myself a Doug + the cage. Needless to say, Smallrig updated their cage! It now has a notch in the NATO rail at the top, so the hotshoe is again fully functional!
That’s great to hear. I saw your comment and I was looking into it - but I couldn’t verify. thanks for letting me know!!
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis All good!
Hi Mark i have just purchased the R10, thanks for a great video. i had been using a canon 80d for about 3 years. I was going to step up to 90d, but sales lady recommended the R10, said lighter, has more fps, and canon really pushing wildlife, so have the animal tracking auto focus. I had my trusty 100-400mm mk2 on 80d all the time, and used my 700d for other lenses. I didnt want to spend nearly £3000 on the R7. Not had a chance to test R10 properly, just a few photos of birds on feeder at full range. Was impresssd with EVF, and the colours straight out of camera on AV. Have looked at a video re settings. So my first mirrorless. I guess my main concern is R10 has no dust or weather sealing, p
Will have to be careful re battery shots lot less, but purchased a spare. So will have to be careful. Hopefully made the right choice over 90d, and first mirrorless camera. Off to a zoo next week to try it out
The 100-400 II is a great fit for the R10/R7, basically the same or even better than the RF 100-500L.
I was the most impressed as i saw how good the IBIS of the R7 and the 100-400 II work together, nearly as good (or as good) as the RF 100-500.
I saw in vacation the R7 for a similar price i would pay where im coming from for a R10 so i just hoped its not a bad deal and at least does what the EOS RP is incapable of. And it wasnt, after 2 months i even sold my full frame camera, the R7 is good enough to be the main camera.
Hello, I need to shoot a video of the assembly of the constructor (shoot many, many hours) from a distance of about 2 meters. Take off your hands as you collect small parts. Canon P10 with 18-45 mm suits me. ? Thank you.
I am unsure if I should get Canon R10 or Fuji XS10?? I loved everything about canon except the lenses availability, also I loved the Fuji part except the Autofocus and Battery. Ughhh! tough decision!
You can always get a lens adapter if you want to use other canon lenses on the r10, I use a Meike EF/EFS lens adapter
You really went deep on this one, so well covered. Is the rolling shutter better then Sony APS-C?
thanks!! it’s really about the same. might be “slightly” better than Sony, but they’re both quite terrible,. 🤣
Hey Mark! I've recently been binging all of your ZV-E10 video's (as a lot of others probably do), and you've been making some great content for that. Love the way you manage to keep me entertained and informed at the same time! I had a question about your setup in the ZV-E10 Rig Build video you made back in November! I've heard and seen some complaints online how the hot shoe on the ZV-E10 is blocked due to the Smallrig Cage. Have you got any recommendations on getting any type of hotshoe extention with that specific build? (or do you maybe have intel on a V2 edition of that Smallrig Cage?)
Nevertheless, keep up the great content!
Get Ulanzi UUrig cage.
Happy you mentioned the X-S10. I'm biased, but I think it's the best overall hybrid option at $1000.
one day I’ll get one in 🤣🤣
R5c?!?!?! I am excited!!!
I feel like the HDR mode of this camera looks really solid!
The r5c is too much camera for me!! 🤣 I love it. It’s not a social media camera - but I’m forcing it t be one 🤣🤣
Would the R10 and RF50 1.8 be a good combo for talking head and product b roll? Also, would it be stabilized?
Hoi Mark,nice video as always.
Informative as always 😊
Hi mark any sigma lenses come out for this body yet?
Yes!! Only one right now but luckily it's an amazing lens - one of the best. The Sigma 18-50 f2.8 amzn.to/3A3bJJq
Mark can you do a canon rp vs zve-10
Hey Mark love the content, planning to get my first camera. I’m into short films and cinematography so what camera should i get? SONY ZVE-10 or Canon r10?
‘Ditch diggin vlogs’…have yet to watch one yet! Nicely done video! Seems like a reasonable camera, but still looks like the Sony zV E10 might be the better choice if just new to market. Hopefully we will see the Fuji comparison soon! Looks like Henry’s has in stock.
really - I'll go to Henry's.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis whoops…it looks like it until you try to actually pick up, then out of stock. Sorry!
@@gordon3988 yeah - checked it out right away but they have none like everyone else 🥲
Getting this with the 800 f11 for birding. Wish they would release an apsc version but I'm not holding my breath lol
Gonna be good for that
R10 is apsc though?
@@brodylockwood14 yes. Obviously
Just a question... do you enjoy it?
I began with RF 800 and full frame camera (really enjoyed it, just wanted sometimes more than 800mm), but as i was going to the R7 and so effective 1280mm... OUCH! I instantly looked for a zoom lens and ended up with the Sigma 150-600C which is MUCH MORE ENJOYABLE than the RF 800 (and was cheaper).
The RF 800 is an awesome lens, especially well stabilized and light for 800mm, but on APS-C its just too much often and the F11 doesnt allow for proper, sharp wildlife photography in the woods for example, at best video with 1/30 to 1/60 shutter speed.
The Sigma give me 240-960mm uncropped (for 4kfine and 120 fps slowmo), in 4k60 crop video something like 400-1700mm. Also its a lot brighter (so lower ISO or higher SS) than the RF 800 F11 with 6.3, just the weight is a bit of a dealbreaker for hiking where i still love the RF 800.
@@harrison00xXx Hey, I ended up getting the 600 f11. It was on sale ($595) and I thought it would maximize the convenience factor while still having enough reach on an apsc camera. I really enjoy it, it is far lighter which makes birding a lot more relaxing. I can hang the setup by the camera strap around my neck and the pictures look great. One thing I noticed is that when the light levels are low the frame rate in the viewfinder dips which makes it harder to track things but that's part of the tradeoff in having the f11 aperture.
Thanks for mentioning the eos rp cause not many see that as a good option even if you just need a camera for some casual hobby photography. Looking forward to a review of the Fujifilm x-s10 :D
full frame canon camera for less tha $1k - a lot of people love it and I can see why
Excellent review as always! Another YT'er said you can download a free cinetone thingy for getting something similar to C-log for grading, not that I would know 1st-hand.
I’ll see if I can find it
Hey Mark, I've been binging your content and I am still deciding whether to get the R10 or the ZV-E10. Both seem to be very good hybrid cameras. What would you reccommend for a beginner who is getting into photography/videography to get. This camera will be mostly used for recreational activities but I want it to be kinda future proof as I can use it for the next 5-7 years.
the r10 is probably better for someone who wants photos as well as video. There aren't a lot of lenses available right now - but that will change in the nest couple of years.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis
THANK YOU! I really appreciate you getting back to me so soon! I love your content and advice! TYSM!
Hi Mark,
I have a very specific question: I need a camera that can shoot 10 bit 4:2:2 4K video, unlimited (or at least for 3 hours uninterrupted) while plugged to USB-C. I was thinking between GH5II and R10. Did you test the R10 video recording with usb power on? Canon website says it has 2 hours limit.
I didn’t try it with the usbc - but the GH5ii is probably best as it’s excellent for things like that
Viltrox have pulled the speed booster off their website.So only resellers will have it and will they support it with firmware?
I really don’t know - but Canon clearly does not want viltrox to sell any products for their cameras. Which is a shame. Canon says viltrox infringes in their “patents”
which one mode is better in low light condition, a wide dr or hdr pq?
How is the 10 bit option when it comes to dynamic range? Pushing and pulling the colours and is it available in all frame rates?
10-bit is only available in HDR unfortunately. The dynamic range is not great on the camera, but 10-bit gives you a lot of colour to work with so you can colour grade it well.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis got it. Thank you for the reply
👋🏻👋🏻 hello ... Can u ask your Sony friend for Sony 50 mm f 1.2 test
he got a job somewhere else!! now I’m not sure if I even have a contact. but I’ll try 🤣
How's the auto focus in 4K? Canon seems to have issues with 4K on a lot of their cameras. Is it duel pixel, eye auto focus in 4K?
it is dual pixel eye autofocus in 4K on the r10 - which is great news.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis In the alley, you were on the 35MM or 50MM? I don't see a link to the 35MM lens in your links. Is the 4K unlimited record time? I was looking at the Z30, but worried the record time limit could be problematic. I'll need to rewatch your comparison.
I just got my R10 after living with my 500D for way to long so ask away I'll happily answer a few questions.
@@derain95 How's the out of camera image quality? How's the video auto focus?
@@JustinPulitzerTrades I'm going out to shoot low light right now, if you have discord I can answer all of your questions better than typing cuz my hand is a bit broken right now.
Im torn between this R10 with a 50mm 1.8 RF and a zv e10 with a sigma 30mm f1.4 lens for videos what do you recommend as this shoots 10bit which may be easier to grade and fix in post.. Also the zebras and wb is a bummer on this unless canon has updated this
both good options, but the 50 on the canon will act as. 75 - so that is pretty tight for video work
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thank you... My other main concern is the HLG3 color grading vs the 10bit PQ HDR on R10 or they hold up pretty the same
Hi does the viltrox speed booster still works? I'm concern that canon might break it with another firmware update.
I honestly don’t know. Even it it does work - I’m not sure it will continue to work after updates.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis 🥲🥵
3:20 - Isn't skin tone too red ? Seems kinda unnatural to me.
Did you use your usual LUT when filming? It would be cool if you could show us how video from this Canon looks in its Standard color mode so we could easily compare colors between Canons, Nikons and Sonys :)
I will be doing zv-E10 vs r10 and I’ll be sure to include that. But if you check out my video comparing the Nikon, Sony, and Two canons for video - you can see it. It’s the section at the beginning that’s says all automatic settings. Those are the standard colors coming out of camera
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis I see, thanks, I'll check it out!
Will I lose my warranty for canon r10 if I install Cinestyle on it?
Hi Mark, can you please tell me any camera that's great for short films under $2000.
If you need autofocus - I would go with a Sony A7C. If you want the best camera for video with pro video features, I would get the Panasonic S5 (but you will have to manually focus - which most people do in short films). If you want the best budget option so that you can get a nice lens - I would get the Panasonic GH5 with the Sigma 16mm 1.4 (again - you will have to manually focus),
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Thank you ❤️
If you lose wedding photos, it's not the bride you have to fear -- it's her mother! Reviewers tend to overlook one of the R10's best features, at least for us old DSLR shooters -- control joystick!
a joystick is a huge advantage for sure
Hi Mark. The pic of guy walking in your studio looks kind of dark. Not sure if it’s the R10 or your lighting. The outside shots looked great though. I hate the R10’s product page on the Canon site. It’s so boring when compared to the Nikon Z30’s web site. It’s basically just a list of specs. At least I get the info I needed from your great review!! 😎
I’m not sure what you mean by pic of guy walking in the studio. Can you clarify?
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Sorry, I meant the “pic of you talking in the studio looks kind of dark.” I have Grammarly on my phone, and it loves to change words around.
ah - haha - the background is a bit darker because I only have an f2.8 and I normally shoot with an f2. so the light on my face is the same. but the background will be dimmer because of the brighter key light,
"Maximum handsomeness on my face.." hahahahahaha You are already looking great, dude:)
🤣🤣
I currently have an olympus em10 0riginal with a lumix 20mm f1:8 lnes. I photograph urban landscape to make oil paintings ,; I am a proffesional artist . However, I need a lens that is slightly wider than a 20mm , and I am hoping to buy a Canon r10 body . what would you recommend to go with the r10 body please. I have been on the canon photo sites on Farcebook, but all I got was ridicule for choosing an R10. I am strictly a photographer, video means absolutely nothin to me . Thankyou in advance> Jase
The problem with the R10, including for photos, is lens selection. To get something wider than a 20 (which is 40mm full frame equivalent) - in the Canon R - lineup - you have almost no options. The 16mm 2.8 (which is a full frame equivalent 26mm on the R10) is about the only thing you can get. And it's not a great lens. 2.8 isn't great in lowlight and the lens is only ok. There is a 24 1.8 which is much better - but it's much more expensive and gives a full frame equiv with the R10 of 38mm which is not much compared to what you have. So the only other option is the 15-35 f2.8 - which is huge and over $2000. This is currently the problem Canon has. You simply cannot buy R-Mount lenses suited for their smaller, lower priced cameras. You can buy an adapter and look for EF glass - which is what some people are doing.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Thankyou so much for your response. I am in no particular rush , I am just going to wait then because I am nervous at the costs of lenses , and the limited options at the moment . Thankyou for your help. I will keep watching your channel and saving up .
Not sure why the advertised 23 fps with electronic shutter is dismissed with the "you'll probably never need it and the 15 fps mechanical shutter works". Many of us who are looking for mirrorless are weighing heavily on electronic shutter capability. 15 fps mechanical shutter and any number ELECTRONIC shutter fps are 2 different things, particulary if the camera was bought with the expectation to rely on the electronic shutter. So, at what fps rate does the electronic shutter operate. And why are they even still showing on their advertising paperwork something that would be a major "pro", but obviously doesn't work.
Fast electronic shutter performance doesn't matter if the rolling shutter isn't good. Sure you'll get 23 fps - but chances are you're shooting something that requires a burst, like a moving subject. And that moving subject will be slanted or bent strangely because of the poor rolling shutter. This does not happen in mechanical shutter. Race cars, sports, wildlife - all will be warped with electronic shutter on the R10.
How can the rolling shutter be fixed?
Just use slow, controlled movements - rolling shutter doesn't matter much if you're shooting properly.
Mark is the canon rp worth it in 2023?
for photos yes. but if you plan to shoot 4K video, you should look at the newly released R8.
Rp or r10 which is better for photography 🤔
I would go for the RP if you don’t need fast shooting
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Thanks brother 🥰
Meh. If you have an M50 and a few lenses, then "trading up" to the R10 means selling the good lenses and going to a system with a total of 4, mostly painfully slow, autofocus lenses. I don't see the advantage. (Although I don't do video at all.)
I think I'll stick with my M50 until Canon either catches up, with a few fast primes (I mean "fast" like f1.8) or f4 or f2.8 zooms, OR Canon allows third party lenses.
If Canon doesn't support this system with useful lenses, then Fuji or Sony would be happy to fill the gap.
I can’t disagree with you here. Might not be the best time to get a canon rf aps-c. Real lack of lens support.
Yeah, EF-M users are pretty fked, thats true.
I always though like this about EF-S users when they realized Canon want to force their customers sooner or later to full frame and then they had a ton of garbage EF-S glass. A problem i completely avoided by just going for the full frame lenses and if possible higher end than lower end (and 2nd hand to make it affordable)
And why are the RF system haters always complaining about missing RF APS-C lenses... yeah it sucks, but damn, EF-S still exists, something i would see as BONUS POINT (because of the Meike EF RF filter adapter!). Except for a 50mm 1.8 and a RF 800 F11 i just prefer EF(-S) lenses, with zooms its less of a problem to adapt lenses than with compact primes where the EF RF adapter gets bigger than the lens itself.
Thankfully many EF-S 17-55 2.8s still exist, probably one of the best (and affordable!) fits to any APS-C canon. At least i love it on my R7
And if you are really that heavy into proper lenses... just get a speedbooster and use better, bigger aperture full frame glass... voila your APS-C is pretty much awesome and full frame like!
How can it replace canon M50? There’s like $400 price difference between the two. 😒
The m50 is great - but if you want good 4k and to move to canon's new system - then this is the way to go. I personally think the m50 still has a place and it's lenses right now are still better in my opinion
M series is dead and no camera models and lenses will be developed for the system. No point in buying a M50 in 2022 unless you are dead sure its current M series lenses can 100% suit your needs because there will be none coming in the horizon. And also, resale value will be meh due to the said reasons.
It depends, if you are mostly a photo fan well the M50 is a way better deal since it's basicaly as good with great AF, 11 FPS in burst and also 24 megapixel for way cheaper.
But as soon as you want some good 4K... the M50 just vanish ^^
@@gigihanmandarin what lenses does the Rf-s system have to wow someone coming from m50? Also what 3rd party lenses will be available? ohh thats right... no 3rd party lenses will ever be availible.
My m50 with canon ef-m 22 and 32 with the sigma 56 mm is a beast for photos and 1080 video! I’m getting an r10 with the rf 35 mm to start! Never parting with my m-50
Cant decide between z30 and r10 ..😒😒😒 which is better ?
I think the R10 is better, but they don't have as many lenses. So if you know what lenses you want and can find them - the R10 would be my pick
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thnk u so much … just for casual photography … r10 m choosing the r 7 is also good but too costly for apsc sensor
For photography rp ot r10 m asking bcoz both come in same price
@@pankajmandal522 I got at vacation in moldawia the R7 (new, in a photo store, with warranty...) nearly for the price i would have paid for the R10 in the EU
I would go for the RP if you are really on a budget and dont care too much about video or animal eye af, or if you really want a hybrid camera, i would just step up directly at the R7, just avoid the R10 (basically too cheaped out, much more than the R7). The RP is at least only cheaped out at the video features, speed and partially by using an "old" 6D II sensor.
I would have never thought about the R7 , let alone the R10 (i hated on them because of the price), but as i saw this deal i first calculated, watched, calculated again, asked... and well i had the R7 in my hands pretty fast. During vacation i saw already coming that the R7 will replace my (for over 2 years...) loved EOS RP.
Whats another interesting option to think about: What about the R10 or RP, depending on your ACTUAL NEEDS and in the future a 2nd hand R10 or RP whatever you dont have yet, they share the same battery and are as RP+R7 combination very good fitting to each other (the one is a full frame photography camera, the other one a faster video and crop sensor camera)
The biggest issue with canon... if you want a good all in one package, you need to get a R5 or R6 Mk2 and to get the full potential out of them you also need overpriced RF glass.
Which one is better R10 or RP?
For video - R10 - for photo RP unless you need really fast burst rate
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis
I have also heard Canon RP is better for photo than 90D. Is it true?
@@hamodiakko yes its full frame. 90 has the megapixels, but full frame just produces cleaner images.
I wanted to be a fan of this camera, but it's just not good enough for the price. I'd rather buy a eos Rp or Fuji S X10 or XT3 all day over this, and the Sony ZV e 10 and Nikon Z30 both have better IQ, IMO. Most videos I've seen taken with the R10 have been soft and noisy especially if the lighting isn't Optimal. It's probably a better photography camera but for video I'd pass. Another great Video Mark
I feel like the R7 is a better value myself even though that’s pretty expensive. Because, like you said, the RP exists for photos for most people, and for video, cameras like the ZV-E10 offer an excellent value. and hybrid - the Xs10 or other fujis make a lot of sense. Bsaically, I totally agree with you. 😂
what would you recommend for live streaming? r10 or zv-e10?
I am really confused betweenn the r10 and the z50 now 😵
it’s a tough choice. both are great
Same here. For non-action photography, I would lean towards the z50, dynamic range often seems better with Nikon cameras. Also, it’s considerably less expensive. For video or sports/birding, the Canon cameras all the way. No stabilization like my m43 cameras and weak APS-C selection has me thinking about a used XH-1 or XS-10, but at some point I’m going to get a Z5 so idk. 🤷♂️
Is it good enough to replace my trusty little M6 Mark II :) ?
That is a better question, actually. And with the current lens selection - maybe not. But for those moving to the RF mount - then yes.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis The Fujifilm camera that you mentioned- I was thinking about that one and the XT-4 as a possible way forward from the EF-M system. I’ve heard many positive things about these two and the X-system as a whole. They seem to have a great lens selection at reasonable prices. I am only afraid of their autofocus. From what reviewers are saying it’s not even in the ballpark with Sony’s and Canon’s. I’d love to watch a comparison review.
Still waiting for z30/ R10/ zve10 and I PHONE photography review brother 😭😭😭
I'll try to get that one done today. 👍
Seems the M Mount has been dead for a while I think this confirms it! I do like the unified mount system but as you mentioned there may be no 3rd part lenses for the R Mount. I hope that's not true but even so the EF lenses available are pretty darn good. Let's see what Canon can do with the RF crop lenses. I have the R7 and love it so far. Cheers.
That R7 is great. Video coming
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis I agree pair it with the EF-S 10-18 you have a winner for vlogging!
Is Dougie OK? I hope he's logged out and doesn't hear you compare him to these new fangled heretics. But, as always a very good review in layman's terms... Oh! I'm not saying your videos aren't as detailed as like... Um...(Gerald)... But seriously...well done. Your reviews are very good for people that might actually buy and use these products vs. just pretend to be thinking about buying them. Like me. Thanks again Mark, I'm looking forward to buying one of your T shirts...
Dougie is going no where. Gonna be back - A LOT 🤣
What is the best budget camera that offers 4k 60fps 1000$-1,100$ range
The Canon r10 is the cheapest option - but there are still no-good lenses available for Canon APS-C - Sigma is coming out with some great ones this year for Canon though. amzn.to/3VmnO3Y
Fuji xs10 has ibis for that price range :)
Yes it does - it's why I talked about the fuji at the end. Great camera
Plz bring Sigma 28-70 full video on zve10...... U can't leave this sexy beast..... Zve10 family is waiting for this. And if possible do side by side comparison with Sigma 18-50
LOL 13:48 I said wow not for me. Your next word are if your filming race cars it’s not for you
Haha - definitely not for you.
Canon quality is superb
it’s great for sure
I like the maximum handsome-ness from R10 😅
🤣
No mic port?
There is a mic port but no headphone port
Dougie suddenly feels left out. 😂
Oh - he'll be back. A LOT 😂
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis That's good news. My Dougie with his 18-105 needs your help to get the best out of it.
I def wanna know how to pop my booty effectively for the camera hahahaha
full tutorial coming
I think X-s10 was better choice
I wonder just when a camera of 1000 dollars became a "budget" camera lol
Or am I just broke
Nice video though, thanks!
it’s the new world. under $1k has become “entry level”!! insane really
This is why they're likely to keep making and selling M-series cameras, even if they don't introduce new ones or more lenses.
Massive dislike, totally unsubscribed :P
That lens selection really kills Canon in this case but certainly they'll fix it before long. Makes the FF Canon more compelling unless you specifically need a cheap body or perhaps a B or C cam, then this R10 can really fit the bill. Seems to give some great output and I'm sure the colours are solid unless it's low light
haha. yeah - when they get some lenses, they’ll be even more popular. A
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Once they brand and make the cripple hammer official, then they'll sell a ton of cameras :P
Sony really have to update their APSC lineup. The 6000 series cameras are obsolete and the ZVE10 is not for photography. Basically I can't recommend a good budget Sony camera for somebody, the R10 and R7 is just better.
They definitely need a flagship APS-C fast.
I completely disagree. While Sony a6000 series are getting long in the tooth, their native apsc lens selection is vastly superior since it actually already exists. Glass is way more important than the body imo. Given Canon’s priors with apsc glass release (both with EF-S and EF-M), it’s begging for serious frustration to trust they will deliver this time with RF-M. And if they do, how long will it take ? and at what price ? And Canon have recently confirmed they won’t allow 3rd parties to develop RF lenses. That doesn’t bode well at all.
On the other hand, with the recent release of the FX-30, it’s pretty clear that new photography and hybrid apsc bodies are around the corner for Sony.
I absolutely love my M6 mk ii, but the lack of native long telephoto and quality fast zooms, finally made me get a Dougie + the sigma 18-50 f2.8 + sony 70-350. I’m keeping my M6 for sentimental reasons and I genuinely love the tactile feeling of shooting with it; but the E-mount got me with these 2 lenses: i love their IQ and compact sizes. It’s a great travel/hiking lineup (will be perfect once I get the 11 f1.8).
I’m waiting a bit to see if an update to the a6400 is coming out for xmas or I’d be happy with an EVF accessory for the zv-e10. Otherwise I still think the A6400 is the best value for money apsc, even 3 years later.
Pop their bottie! 😅
seems like a negetive review
you really are looking for negativity where there isn’t any. the canon cameras are great but the lens selection is not. I point out pros and cons of all cameras on the channel. I’m not going to say a camera is perfect when it isn’t.if you watch the other reviews, you will see I point out the negatives of the Sony, Fuji, Nikon, Panasonic and Olympus cameras. It’s ok to like canon - I do as well - but you have to look at cameras objectively and take the good with the bad,