People shot with DSLRs for many years before they had log. Yes it may create more of a baked in look but if that look works for someone than that’s perfectly fine. If one really wants more dynamic range they can shoot HDR PQ on the R10 which is also 10bit 4:2:2. Yes it’s HDR but NLEs like FCP make it super easy to convert from HDR to SDR and allow more flexibility in how that exposure extra range to translated to SDR. With a little bit of effort the HDR PQ can kind of be used as a log format. That’s kind of what HDR PQ is. Is a log curve that’s an industry standard so TVs can display it properly. Canon also has a nice application to create custom picture profiles for those that want a more specific look straight out of the camera. I highly suggest more people explore shooting with the HDR PQ mode. Services like UA-cam will automatically convert HDR PQ to SDR so if conversion is a concern well it doesn’t really need to be. Non log is still a very solid way to shoot video however. Especially if one will not be doing a ton of color work on the video. Log is in some ways over rated, especially if one doesn’t know how to properly use it the best way. It creates a ton of extra effort that may not even be necessary if one just wants good looking realistic colors. Canon is known for amazing out of the box colors. If higher dynamic range is a desire than HDR PQ is there to do just that. I have a Canon R6 and only shoot HDR PQ now. I can get up to 700 nits HDR straight out of the camera which is really good. Clog3 could push that a bit more but I find 700 nits is a good value to aim for right now given that most OLED barely hit that right now with on;y 25% coverage. 50% coverage quickly drops to around 300 nits. Most LED TV owners are also in the 500-800 nit range except for a handful of TVs. HDR is far from the theoretical limit right now. The other advantage of HDR PQ is it’s very clean vs clog3 on my R6. Clog3 pushes shadow noise a bit too much and the same ISO with HDR PQ looks considerably cleaner. I find HDR PQ much easier to shoot with in terms of getting extra dynamic range without the need for manual grading or post noise reduction. It may not be enough for everyone but I think many users would find it a great alternative once they learn how to handle the HDR video in a NLE.
Wow, thanks for the tip. I will have to try out the HDR PQ mode. Are there any other settings I should take into consideration if I want as neutral coloring as possible? I love to color grade post shooting.
@@markwiemels I’m using Sirui’s anamorphic line for APS-C sensors. In fact, I bought the R10 because the Sirui lenses I got can’t cover a full frame sensor. (They do, of course, have several full frame options.) They’re pretty cheap, too. The 50mm is around $500.
I was trying to find the set that has the 35mm, 50mm, and 85mm T2.0 on Amazon, but then found the 25mm, 35mm, 50mm T1.05 instead (currently at $1,399 for the set). Mark, what are your thoughts on this set? Is there a reason I would want a 25mm if I'm getting a 35mm?
Hello Master: Please help and give me some advice, The camera I am currently using is Canon EOS R10, The kit lens used with it is (RF-S18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM) My main subject matter is toy photography. The secondary shooting content is street photography or portrait photos. Now I want to buy new lenses, after watching your video, Want to compare between Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM and RF85mm F2 Macro IS STM After making a choice, I would like to ask you to give me some advice on which lens is more suitable for me? Thank you.🙏
Hey Mark, I plan to buy the Sony ZV-E10 this winter after watching your videos! Right now I'm shooting film with the Canon EOS Rebel G, and I'm wondering if the 7Artisan 35mm lens will work for both the Rebel G and the ZV-E10?? Thanks!
Idk if you need this, but to solve this problem you have to press menu - then to the icon of camera with some points under , then number 4- then turn on the release shutter w/o lens
It'd be interesting to see how this compares to the RF 50/1.8. Similar price.. but with autofocus... which I require. A heavy lens plus MF takes the fun out of shooting for me. I love the R10, more than I expected. I had an R8 and thought it would be a downgrade; but I ended up liking shooting with it more. (Small, light and easy was my goal) I got the same kit lens but disagree that it's worth $100 extra. It is easily bested by any other lens. The 18-150 is sharper for me. It's still very small and covers a 24-240mm FF equiv. range. It's better in every situation. I have a 16mm/2.8 RF that works great on it too.. and I planned on getting either a 35 or 50 to do portraits. Probably 50, since it's less than half the price and half the size... and I like tighter shots anyway. I would wager the results would also be remarkable comparing the 18-45 to the RF 50/1.8. If I were to suggest a camera/lens combo, it would be the R10 with an RF prime of the person's first choice of photography... either the 16, 35, or 50.
Great video. I'm still confused a bit. The only 7artisan RF mount 50mm T2.0 lens is a full frame. There is a 50mm T1.05 RF mount APS-C frame Lens. Shouldn't we be using APS-C with R7 or you are not using all of the lens when using a Full Frame lens on a APS-C camera?
If the lens is marketed as a full frame lens it just means that it will cover sensors up to full frame If the lens is marketed as a aps-c lens it will only cover sensors up to aps-c Which means that you will get large vignetting when using a full frame sensor camera To get the most out of your lens you should use a camera with the largest possible sensor it supports Older m42 or even some modern lenses may actually cover larger sensors than full frame - fyi
thanks for this video man! really insighful... i bought the r50 and torn between buying a 2nd hand 16-35 2.8L or a 16mm 7artisans... i rarely shoot video but i wanna try it out for 2025. can you assist in making that decision? :)
Nice! I just got an r10, and I’ve picked up a TTartisans 17mm F1.4. Although, it completely disabled any electronic image stabilization. Did you stabilize any of this footage in post? It looks way less wobbly than what I’m seeing out of my R10.
Please, I have a question. This lens can I use in another camera with a different mount? For example, Panasonic cameras. And to use this cinema lens on the Canon R10, did you need to use an adapter?
THANK YOU MUCH!!! I don’t know why a lot of people are underestimating this camera! I used even the canon rp and still produced sharp images. From my experience as long as you have nice glass, it doesn’t matter what kinda camera u have y’kno to a certain extent lol but the R10 has not failed me. I’ve shot 2 University Basketball games with the R10!! 95% of my shots were usable. No I wasn’t just shooting at everything, I would wait a millisecond just before the action of what I wanted to capture lol but all I’m all for what I need…it’s perfect for me!!
do you have to change setting in order to use third party cine lens? i have canon r10 and bought meike 35mm F0.95 and it fit in the mount but couldnt record or even snap a photo.
Hello, to use this cinema lens on this camera, do I need an adapter? And this camera only has digital stabilization, and the cinema lens also doesn't have stabilization, and filming without a tripod will make the image very blurry?
Thank you for the video :-). Would you say that the Cinema lens is sharper and with more cinematic look also when you compare it against non kit canon RF lenses? I have some L lenses but I never had a cinematic lens. Would you think that a cinema lens would bring a benefit over my existing lenses? My lenses are RF 14-35 f4, RF 24-70 f2.8, RF 70-200 f2.8, then the non L RF 24mm f1.8, RF 35mm f1.8 and the EF 500mm f4 L.
Hi, I m new in filming and I just purchased the 7artisans 35mm 1.05. The big problem is my camera doesn't start filming or shooting anything. Can you tell me please how should I proceed? I believe that your work will look more complete after. Thank you!
Hi thanks for the video. I bought this lens for the canon R10 but the image is really tight, i have to stand about 40 feet back to get to be able to fit a full car into the shot. I am a beginner, is this just the trade off for not having a full frame camera or an i doing something wrong? Thanks
Setting in the menus, operate shutter without lens or something similar. Should be able to find the exact setting an location in the menus with a google search.
You know my first love was cricket, but now i love my camera gears more than almost everything. I'm glad being an American your daughter loves cricket. bdw I'm from South Asia Mr. Wiemels.
Thanks this video was helpful…. What do you think about buying the 24 105 kit lens for full frame instead, buying that used is around 150 dollars instead of the R10 kit lens. Appreciate the help
I have not had my hands on the 24-105, but I believe it is a better lens, only issue is 24mm is not all that wide on a crop camera. Could be value it having both lenses.
I am a Gamer and in our world, price for performance counts way more than overpaying for a better device that is not even worth the money. I would rather spend that extra amount on good glass. I went with the R10. For the money, it is the best price for performance camera in the R range in my opinion. Because the prices of the majority of the R-range cameras, especially the R3 and R5, jesus, they are not worth the money they are priced at. I brought the R10 instead of the R7 and did not buy the lens kit. Instead I used the extra money to get a 35 MM,1.8, IS , STM, RF MACRO lense by paying an extra £200.00. I want that shallow depth of field. I would like my subjects up close, most of the time. I don't shoot landscapes nor do I like wildlife photography because I personally think that is boring. I shoot people, and I do occasionally shoot weddings. I am happy to move over to APS -C sensors for street photogrphy because it is definitely for me. Don't get me wrong, I love the full frame too! Specs count just as much as limitations but the shooter behind the sensor counts a lot more in my opinion. Most of the R-range cameras are good. In this day and age, there is no right or wrong but the shooter behind the sensor has become more important than the devices themselves these days. It has become a great time to be a photographer.
Hello, I'm from Brazil, and I really like your videos, and I completely trust your technical and practical analyses of the equipment you analyze. I would like to buy the Canon R10 camera, and I have watched several tutorials about this camera here on UA-camr saying that this Canon R10 camera is of poor quality; it has a cheap, lightweight plastic body that breaks easily, that the battery is horrible, and that the camera heats up a lot. The worst thing about it is the rolling shutter in 4K and Full HD. Could you please give your opinion about this camera?
Great video. I looked at the lenses but they’re all E Mount. Excuse my novice understanding but is there one of these that’s directly compatible with the R10 or do we need an adapter?
When I put the Lens on my R10 it says “MF” and won’t let me record but when i change the Lens and put the kit Lens the “MF” goes away and lets me record, why?? Please help
Heyyy, thanks for the amazing video. Very helpful! Noticed some lovely footage of lovely Melbourne. One query from a fellow local that's looking to take photography a little more seriously and buy my first camera. Would you suggest the Canon EOS R10 Mirrorless Camera with RFS 18-150STM Lens is a good first beginners camera or would you suggest alternatives in the similar price range? Thanks and take care!
In my opinion this is not a fair comparison. Compare with 50mm 2.8 . Those have image stabilization,low light capability,auto focus and great image quality. So does the price.
Mark, great video as usual. It was very informative to watch this video because there is not many r10 videos on UA-cam showing it’s cinematic potential. I hate that there is no native glass for canon APS-C besides kit lens. I love canon colors, but also have been contemplating getting Fuji. Mark, in your opinion. Would you choose Canon APS-C or Fuji APS-C camera for video? Thank you Mark.
Such a hard question, I have both Fuji and Canon APS-C. I think the Fuji cameras are better video cameras in general, except for the issues with autofocus, which is a deal breaker for some.
I am in the market now and contemplating Sony A7C or Canon R7. Leaning towards A7c because of full frame and impressed with 10 bit and 33 mp. Love the cricket video! Please suggest the winner!
Crop vs full frames changes the field of view, don’t worry about thinking about these conversions, they are only useful for people that have shot full frame most of their life and have focal lengths they prefer already. For most people using this camera, these calculations are irrelevant.
T-stop is more accurate (actual measurement) than F-stop which is a mere calculation or theoretical. You need equipment and time to measure the light which is one reason CL are more expensive.
Based on the title I thought you are going to use some Master primes or Cooks or something similar. What is hollywood on this lens? T-stops? Manual focus? Very click-baity title
@@krane15 if I’m looking for hollywood cinematic lens and its performance on cheap camera here on youtube and i get to this video, it’s literally false advertising. Its a cheap lens on a cheap camera body, that’s it, that’s the point. Misleading, clickbaity video
Budget lenses like these are used in video production all the time, including in Hollywood. Obviously not a big budget production. These are especially popular for short films, and passion projects, where the budgets can be extremely low.
@@krane15 so many options but in either case i would never spend my own money on this lens, if you lifestyle filmmaker get sigma 18-35, if you doing shorts and music videos meike primes will be better with full set and "simalr-ish" color consistency for +- same price. its cool to have reviews like this or we would have to buy/rent everything before making a descision.
No you didn’t put Hollywood Cine lens. You put cheap china garbage on this R10, man. No even close pic to freakin Rokinon or other China “glass”, imho.
neither R10 nor R7 gives you any "cinematic" look. no, not even "some sort of". its still shitty compressed mp4 stuff from a consumer cheapo camera with photo look colours you get from these. and maybe YOU as a hobbyfilmer have to "edit the heck out of it", but pro colorists do it way faster because of a good workflow and professional editing consoles. even with more cine cams like blackmagic or zcam you don`t get the real cine look like from arri or panavision. cine look is not just playing around with some colours, consumer cams and bokeh. it still looks like VIDEO, not film. so, the videolook of today is better than 20 yrs ago, ofcourse. but it still looks like video. thats the experience i made since i started filming in 2006. we have great cameras today, coming from a long way from super8 to mini DV and finally get big sensors and interchangeable lenses. but let`s be honest... a closer look reveals: this is no cine look. its photo look video with 24 photos per second. oh and that 7artisans chinese cheapo lens also doesn`t kick you into cine. nope.
A cinematic look is mainly achieved with lighting, composition, and lenses/filters. You are dramatically over estimating the role that the camera plays in getting this look.
You’re not old, you’re got wisdom and experience. That what I tell everyone. 😂
Only just saw this comment. I think I need a mist filter to hide all my wisdom.
@@markwiemels 🤣
@@markwiemels gaussian 100 % 😄
People shot with DSLRs for many years before they had log. Yes it may create more of a baked in look but if that look works for someone than that’s perfectly fine. If one really wants more dynamic range they can shoot HDR PQ on the R10 which is also 10bit 4:2:2. Yes it’s HDR but NLEs like FCP make it super easy to convert from HDR to SDR and allow more flexibility in how that exposure extra range to translated to SDR. With a little bit of effort the HDR PQ can kind of be used as a log format. That’s kind of what HDR PQ is. Is a log curve that’s an industry standard so TVs can display it properly. Canon also has a nice application to create custom picture profiles for those that want a more specific look straight out of the camera. I highly suggest more people explore shooting with the HDR PQ mode. Services like UA-cam will automatically convert HDR PQ to SDR so if conversion is a concern well it doesn’t really need to be.
Non log is still a very solid way to shoot video however. Especially if one will not be doing a ton of color work on the video. Log is in some ways over rated, especially if one doesn’t know how to properly use it the best way. It creates a ton of extra effort that may not even be necessary if one just wants good looking realistic colors. Canon is known for amazing out of the box colors. If higher dynamic range is a desire than HDR PQ is there to do just that. I have a Canon R6 and only shoot HDR PQ now. I can get up to 700 nits HDR straight out of the camera which is really good. Clog3 could push that a bit more but I find 700 nits is a good value to aim for right now given that most OLED barely hit that right now with on;y 25% coverage. 50% coverage quickly drops to around 300 nits. Most LED TV owners are also in the 500-800 nit range except for a handful of TVs. HDR is far from the theoretical limit right now.
The other advantage of HDR PQ is it’s very clean vs clog3 on my R6. Clog3 pushes shadow noise a bit too much and the same ISO with HDR PQ looks considerably cleaner. I find HDR PQ much easier to shoot with in terms of getting extra dynamic range without the need for manual grading or post noise reduction. It may not be enough for everyone but I think many users would find it a great alternative once they learn how to handle the HDR video in a NLE.
Good point!
Wow, thanks for the tip. I will have to try out the HDR PQ mode. Are there any other settings I should take into consideration if I want as neutral coloring as possible? I love to color grade post shooting.
Long time Canon user here! Always enjoy your videos!
Awwwh your daughter is so cute ❤❤
Another great video!
Thank you Mark!
Fantastic review! Would love to see a comparison between this lens, the kit lens, and the nifty fifty adapted.
What camera and lens combo are you using for your talking head setup? Looks really clean!
Such a great review. I’ve purchase this camera for over a year and haven’t found it a review so simple and straight to the point. Thank you 🙏🏽
I’ve actually been using budget anamorphic lenses with my R10 and I’m loving the results. Never heard of 7Artisans before but I will check them out!
Oh, I like that idea. What brand and model lens are you using?
@@markwiemels I’m using Sirui’s anamorphic line for APS-C sensors. In fact, I bought the R10 because the Sirui lenses I got can’t cover a full frame sensor. (They do, of course, have several full frame options.) They’re pretty cheap, too. The 50mm is around $500.
@@JayFingers thanks for the heads up, I will check them out.
I was trying to find the set that has the 35mm, 50mm, and 85mm T2.0 on Amazon, but then found the 25mm, 35mm, 50mm T1.05 instead (currently at $1,399 for the set). Mark, what are your thoughts on this set? Is there a reason I would want a 25mm if I'm getting a 35mm?
Oh, and this is for an R7.
Hello Master:
Please help and give me some advice,
The camera I am currently using is Canon EOS R10,
The kit lens used with it is (RF-S18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM)
My main subject matter is toy photography.
The secondary shooting content is street photography or portrait photos.
Now I want to buy new lenses, after watching your video,
Want to compare between Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM and RF85mm F2 Macro IS STM
After making a choice, I would like to ask you to give me some advice on which lens is more suitable for me? Thank you.🙏
Hey Mark, I plan to buy the Sony ZV-E10 this winter after watching your videos! Right now I'm shooting film with the Canon EOS Rebel G, and I'm wondering if the 7Artisan 35mm lens will work for both the Rebel G and the ZV-E10?? Thanks!
Let's say you made this video to prove that you are a very good actor for Hollywood under the guise of having a lens with great details 🙂
What do you mean ?
Very impressive bokeh too. I definitely wasn’t expecting that! Nice!
Hey I purchased the 50mm come lens to run with my canon r10 but I’m not able to take pics or videos. Is there something I need to turn on or off
Idk if you need this, but to solve this problem you have to press menu - then to the icon of camera with some points under , then number 4- then turn on the release shutter w/o lens
Great Video, Mark! Thank you for your efforts.
It'd be interesting to see how this compares to the RF 50/1.8. Similar price.. but with autofocus... which I require. A heavy lens plus MF takes the fun out of shooting for me. I love the R10, more than I expected. I had an R8 and thought it would be a downgrade; but I ended up liking shooting with it more. (Small, light and easy was my goal) I got the same kit lens but disagree that it's worth $100 extra. It is easily bested by any other lens. The 18-150 is sharper for me. It's still very small and covers a 24-240mm FF equiv. range. It's better in every situation. I have a 16mm/2.8 RF that works great on it too.. and I planned on getting either a 35 or 50 to do portraits. Probably 50, since it's less than half the price and half the size... and I like tighter shots anyway. I would wager the results would also be remarkable comparing the 18-45 to the RF 50/1.8.
If I were to suggest a camera/lens combo, it would be the R10 with an RF prime of the person's first choice of photography... either the 16, 35, or 50.
sigma just announced 18-50mm f2.8
Great video. I'm still confused a bit. The only 7artisan RF mount 50mm T2.0 lens is a full frame. There is a 50mm T1.05 RF mount APS-C frame Lens. Shouldn't we be using APS-C with R7 or you are not using all of the lens when using a Full Frame lens on a APS-C camera?
If the lens is marketed as a full frame lens it just means that it will cover sensors up to full frame
If the lens is marketed as a aps-c lens it will only cover sensors up to aps-c
Which means that you will get large vignetting when using a full frame sensor camera
To get the most out of your lens you should use a camera with the largest possible sensor it supports
Older m42 or even some modern lenses may actually cover larger sensors than full frame - fyi
how does the cinema lens to the rf50mm f1.8?
Also would you recommend this combo for video podcasting?
What is the best cine lens for the Canon R50 shooting real estate?
Can you use it while taking photos? Why no one speaks about using them for photo
thanks for this video man! really insighful... i bought the r50 and torn between buying a 2nd hand 16-35 2.8L or a 16mm 7artisans... i rarely shoot video but i wanna try it out for 2025. can you assist in making that decision? :)
Hey, Great video,
I bought this lens and I can't use it. it doesnt want to take photos or video. any tips?
It's a setting in the menu system, release shutter without lens, or something like that.
Nice! I just got an r10, and I’ve picked up a TTartisans 17mm F1.4. Although, it completely disabled any electronic image stabilization. Did you stabilize any of this footage in post? It looks way less wobbly than what I’m seeing out of my R10.
6:36
The quality looks great 😊
How does it compare to RF50 1.8 and the RF 24-70 at 50mm?
Very attractive for using the cine lens. Are there any videos on how to adjust the camera to use this unsupported manual lens?
Menu system, release shutter with out lens.
Please, I have a question. This lens can I use in another camera with a different mount? For example, Panasonic cameras. And to use this cinema lens on the Canon R10, did you need to use an adapter?
It's a native RF mount, but comes on most mount, you just choose the right mount for your camera.
@@markwiemels Thank you.
Did you use 10bit Hdr mode? I wasn't sure if 10 bit mode works with manual lens?
THANK YOU MUCH!!! I don’t know why a lot of people are underestimating this camera! I used even the canon rp and still produced sharp images. From my experience as long as you have nice glass, it doesn’t matter what kinda camera u have y’kno to a certain extent lol but the R10 has not failed me. I’ve shot 2 University Basketball games with the R10!! 95% of my shots were usable. No I wasn’t just shooting at everything, I would wait a millisecond just before the action of what I wanted to capture lol but all I’m all for what I need…it’s perfect for me!!
It’s honestly a superb camera.
This lens has L mount right how its supporting RF mount?
do you have to change setting in order to use third party cine lens? i have canon r10 and bought meike 35mm F0.95 and it fit in the mount but couldnt record or even snap a photo.
Setting in the camera, release shutter w/o lens. Should be able to google it for exact instructions.
@@markwiemels omg its worked thank you thank you mark
@@Adventurewithawng Excellent! Have fun!
How do you stabilize the manual optics on a Canon?
Would you recommend 50mm or 24mm one? On Canon R10?
24 would be more versatile, as a single lens.
Hello, to use this cinema lens on this camera, do I need an adapter? And this camera only has digital stabilization, and the cinema lens also doesn't have stabilization, and filming without a tripod will make the image very blurry?
No.
Which lens hood can we buy for 18-150 RF lens for R10?
Thank you for the video :-). Would you say that the Cinema lens is sharper and with more cinematic look also when you compare it against non kit canon RF lenses? I have some L lenses but I never had a cinematic lens. Would you think that a cinema lens would bring a benefit over my existing lenses? My lenses are RF 14-35 f4, RF 24-70 f2.8, RF 70-200 f2.8, then the non L RF 24mm f1.8, RF 35mm f1.8 and the EF 500mm f4 L.
Hard to say, if you are shooting on an APS-C camera, like the R10, I would look at this lens - ua-cam.com/video/chaO2gB-gm4/v-deo.html
Hi, I m new in filming and I just purchased the 7artisans 35mm 1.05.
The big problem is my camera doesn't start filming or shooting anything.
Can you tell me please how should I proceed? I believe that your work will look more complete after.
Thank you!
It’s a setting, operate shutter without lens, or something similar.
Hi thanks for the video. I bought this lens for the canon R10 but the image is really tight, i have to stand about 40 feet back to get to be able to fit a full car into the shot.
I am a beginner, is this just the trade off for not having a full frame camera or an i doing something wrong? Thanks
That's just the field of view of 50mm, on a crop camera. If you want something wider, I would get this lens - ua-cam.com/video/qSSOTIx3Q78/v-deo.html
ED HELMS, are you??
kkkkkk
thanks for the content, man
🔥
You have no idea how much i envy you for the free lenses you have been gifted! lol. I will take some if you ever run out of room! Awesome review.
100x optical zoom is the basic requirement any suggestions?
Any Canon lenses you like for the R10 that can perform in low light too?
The RF 35 f 1.8 is very good.
I bought the lens and tried it on but camera is not taking pictures. Is there any suggestions?
Setting in the menus, operate shutter without lens or something similar. Should be able to find the exact setting an location in the menus with a google search.
Is that artisan lens good for photography as well as videography?
Yes.
T 2.00 vs T1.05?? which one is best for cine films on R10
I would go with the T1.05 model for the R10 only (this 25mm one - geni.us/S8sl) . If you also have a Full Frame camera, then I might go with the T2.0.
Hello Marck. That lens is super. Is there any with those features for the Canon M50?
Not that I am aware of.
@@markwiemels thanks 🙏🏻
I have a question I have to buy the adapter??
No, it’s a native RF lens mount.
@@markwiemels thanks you
You know my first love was cricket, but now i love my camera gears more than almost everything.
I'm glad being an American your daughter loves cricket. bdw I'm from South Asia Mr. Wiemels.
Great to hear! Yes, it's such a great sport.
Thanks a lot for your fantastic review.
I'm so glad it was helpful! Thanks.
What is the 2024 or 2025 replacement model for the R10?
Thanks this video was helpful…. What do you think about buying the 24 105 kit lens for full frame instead, buying that used is around 150 dollars instead of the R10 kit lens. Appreciate the help
I have not had my hands on the 24-105, but I believe it is a better lens, only issue is 24mm is not all that wide on a crop camera. Could be value it having both lenses.
@@markwiemels That makes sense! Thank you!
Mark, this is awesome. Do you recommend a straight adapter or speed adapter for this lens on an R10 for talking head videos? - Jeff
I am a Gamer and in our world, price for performance counts way more than overpaying for a better device that is not even worth the money. I would rather spend that extra amount on good glass. I went with the R10. For the money, it is the best price for performance camera in the R range in my opinion. Because the prices of the majority of the R-range cameras, especially the R3 and R5, jesus, they are not worth the money they are priced at. I brought the R10 instead of the R7 and did not buy the lens kit. Instead I used the extra money to get a 35 MM,1.8, IS , STM, RF MACRO lense by paying an extra £200.00. I want that shallow depth of field. I would like my subjects up close, most of the time. I don't shoot landscapes nor do I like wildlife photography because I personally think that is boring. I shoot people, and I do occasionally shoot weddings. I am happy to move over to APS -C sensors for street photogrphy because it is definitely for me. Don't get me wrong, I love the full frame too! Specs count just as much as limitations but the shooter behind the sensor counts a lot more in my opinion. Most of the R-range cameras are good. In this day and age, there is no right or wrong but the shooter behind the sensor has become more important than the devices themselves these days. It has become a great time to be a photographer.
Can I take photos with this lens on the R10?
Hello, I'm from Brazil, and I really like your videos, and I completely trust your technical and practical analyses of the equipment you analyze. I would like to buy the Canon R10 camera, and I have watched several tutorials about this camera here on UA-camr saying that this Canon R10 camera is of poor quality; it has a cheap, lightweight plastic body that breaks easily, that the battery is horrible, and that the camera heats up a lot. The worst thing about it is the rolling shutter in 4K and Full HD. Could you please give your opinion about this camera?
Help!! I bought this lens but my R10 isn’t shooting when I put this lens on? Why is this and how can I solve it??
In the menu, release shutter without lens, or something like that. Normal issue, just need to change that setting.
Thanks a lot, will try it right now!
@@markwiemels I couldnt find it in the menu, would you tell me where in the menu this option is? 🙏🏽
@@ditieri I’m not near my camera for a while. You should be able to google it, it’s a common thing.
Great video. I looked at the lenses but they’re all E Mount. Excuse my novice understanding but is there one of these that’s directly compatible with the R10 or do we need an adapter?
You just need the RF mount version, which is what I have.
When I put the Lens on my R10 it says “MF” and won’t let me record but when i change the Lens and put the kit Lens the “MF” goes away and lets me record, why?? Please help
Setting in the menu, release shutter without lens.
You using adapter yes?
No, native mount.
Heyyy, thanks for the amazing video. Very helpful!
Noticed some lovely footage of lovely Melbourne. One query from a fellow local that's looking to take photography a little more seriously and buy my first camera. Would you suggest the Canon EOS R10 Mirrorless Camera with RFS 18-150STM Lens is a good first beginners camera or would you suggest alternatives in the similar price range? Thanks and take care!
I would also look at the Fuji cameras, X-T30, X-T3, or X-S10.
@@markwiemels Awesome! Thanks a lot. If you had to pick one among them which one would you suggest?
I learned something new today… thanks!
Me too.
The focus peaking on the R10 is pretty good if you’re using manual lenses
Sony ZV-E10 or Canon R10 for Video ?
ZV-E10 for the lens choices. R10 has nicer ergonomics, but the lens options are poor.
In my opinion this is not a fair comparison. Compare with 50mm 2.8 . Those have image stabilization,low light capability,auto focus and great image quality. So does the price.
Mark, great video as usual. It was very informative to watch this video because there is not many r10 videos on UA-cam showing it’s cinematic potential. I hate that there is no native glass for canon APS-C besides kit lens. I love canon colors, but also have been contemplating getting Fuji. Mark, in your opinion. Would you choose Canon APS-C or Fuji APS-C camera for video? Thank you Mark.
Such a hard question, I have both Fuji and Canon APS-C. I think the Fuji cameras are better video cameras in general, except for the issues with autofocus, which is a deal breaker for some.
i love that the kids are playing cricket
I am in the market now and contemplating Sony A7C or Canon R7. Leaning towards A7c because of full frame and impressed with 10 bit and 33 mp. Love the cricket video! Please suggest the winner!
Super close call. A7c is 8bit video. I would probably pick the Sony for the lens choices, but I prefer the R7 overall as a camera.
Fantastic lense ad...
Excellent thanks so much
What was it like working with Bradley Cooper and Zach Galefianakis in the Hangover films? :)
I can shoot 4k 24fps bro with that artisan lens?
Don't focus so much on 24fps. Its not significant nowadays.
the r10 have log profile, is called hdr pq
Wouldn’t the crop sensor make the 50mm to 85?
Crop vs full frames changes the field of view, don’t worry about thinking about these conversions, they are only useful for people that have shot full frame most of their life and have focal lengths they prefer already. For most people using this camera, these calculations are irrelevant.
T-stop is more accurate (actual measurement) than F-stop which is a mere calculation or theoretical. You need equipment and time to measure the light which is one reason CL are more expensive.
Yo this shit was too funny 😂😂
VERY helpful
That is a nice lens for the money
Is it hard to believe that a 500 dollar lens would be this good?
Protip: shot in HDRPQ mode, technically it's 10bit 422.
Any indian here
India kuttibaad Pakistan zindabad
I'm here
两个阿三😂
Bahahahah
I'm
Why wouldn't I believe the results? People have been putting cinema lenses on digital cameras for years.
"my daughter" shows video of justin beiber
Based on the title I thought you are going to use some Master primes or Cooks or something similar.
What is hollywood on this lens? T-stops? Manual focus? Very click-baity title
Point being? Ever read the heading on as newspaper? Watch a newscast? Even a product ad. Hyperbole is how its done bub. As long as its not a lie.
@@krane15 point being, bub, that in this case it’s literally a lie. This aint no hollywood cinema lens.
@@krane15 if I’m looking for hollywood cinematic lens and its performance on cheap camera here on youtube and i get to this video, it’s literally false advertising.
Its a cheap lens on a cheap camera body, that’s it, that’s the point. Misleading, clickbaity video
5:06 Indians incoming 😊
Hehehe😊
"Hollywood Cinema Lens" nice Joke
Budget lenses like these are used in video production all the time, including in Hollywood. Obviously not a big budget production. These are especially popular for short films, and passion projects, where the budgets can be extremely low.
Canon rX "the beast"??? Still love Sony cameras better...
Canon is a lens company that makes cameras. Sony is a mega company that makes everything.
Way too much emphasis on Bokeh these days - it may be "artsy" in photos, but it is unnatural and really annoying in movies!
You really need to study more cinema history. In the mean time, its better not to repeat that sentence.
by something with RF mount? no, tnk
Wdym bro
Hollywood lens 🤣
What would you prefer?
@@krane15 so many options but in either case i would never spend my own money on this lens, if you lifestyle filmmaker get sigma 18-35, if you doing shorts and music videos meike primes will be better with full set and "simalr-ish" color consistency for +- same price. its cool to have reviews like this or we would have to buy/rent everything before making a descision.
No you didn’t put Hollywood Cine lens. You put cheap china garbage on this R10, man. No even close pic to freakin Rokinon or other China “glass”, imho.
And the R10 has no IBIS.... deal breaker 😞
neither R10 nor R7 gives you any "cinematic" look. no, not even "some sort of". its still shitty compressed mp4 stuff from a consumer cheapo camera with photo look colours you get from these. and maybe YOU as a hobbyfilmer have to "edit the heck out of it", but pro colorists do it way faster because of a good workflow and professional editing consoles. even with more cine cams like blackmagic or zcam you don`t get the real cine look like from arri or panavision. cine look is not just playing around with some colours, consumer cams and bokeh. it still looks like VIDEO, not film.
so, the videolook of today is better than 20 yrs ago, ofcourse. but it still looks like video. thats the experience i made since i started filming in 2006. we have great cameras today, coming from a long way from super8 to mini DV and finally get big sensors and interchangeable lenses. but let`s be honest... a closer look reveals: this is no cine look. its photo look video with 24 photos per second.
oh and that 7artisans chinese cheapo lens also doesn`t kick you into cine. nope.
A cinematic look is mainly achieved with lighting, composition, and lenses/filters. You are dramatically over estimating the role that the camera plays in getting this look.