2024 Toyota Alphard Crash and Safety Tests

Discover the results of the 2024 Toyota Alphard's JNCAP crash and safety tests, evaluating its crashworthiness and overall vehicle safety performance.
Safety is paramount, especially for families! Join 4drivetime as we analyze the 2024 Toyota Alphard's performance in the rigorous JNCAP crash tests and explore its advanced safety features!
The Toyota Alphard/Vellfire received an overall score of 181.78 (out of 197), giving it a 4-star rating.
The Alphard/Vellfire received an A rank of 88.84 points (out of 89 points) in preventive safety, a B rank of 84.93 points (out of 100 points) in collision safety, and a score of 8 points (8 points) in accident automatic emergency notification system. It was evaluated as an advanced type with a perfect score).
Regarding collision safety, which resulted in a B-rank rating, the rating was 95% for full-wrap frontal collision, 95% for offset frontal collision, 100% for side collision, 93% for rear collision neck protection, and 100% for pedestrian leg protection. However, it was rated 61% for pedestrian head protection and 77% for seatbelt reminder.
---------
Hope you enjoy this video and leave your comment bellow. To stay up to date with alot of new Videos
Subscribe now 👉 goo.gl/M7yJtf
Press the little bell ((🔔)) to get notifications
Follow us
Facebook : www. 4dri...
twitter : / 4drivetime
4U - Mehul Choudhary / mehulchoudhary
Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported - CC BY 3.0
Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/48Os7td
Music promoted by Audio Library bit.ly/3TrcNxg
#toyota #alphard #2024 #minivan #safety #jnccap #crashtest #safetyfeatures #4drivetime #ToyotaAlphard #CrashTests #Safety

[@4DriveTime]

Subscribe now 👉 goo.gl/M7yJtf
Press the little bell ((🔔)) to get notifications

[@Toyotaaustrailia]

You testing new alphard

[@user-wi7kw5yx7b]

Well done❤

[@SteelBird1000]

side crash always leads to roll-over.

[@Catlover12969]

Bro why did you destroy my favorite car😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

[@tashanglong]

This video presents a misleading impression, akin to a Japanese-style illusion.
The 100% frontal collision test employs a wall constructed of hollow steel reinforcement. Upon closer examination at reduced playback speed, one can discern slight undulations, indicating that the wall itself absorbs a significant amount of the impact energy. This is not representative of real-world collision scenarios.
In the 50% offset frontal collision test, the striking object is equipped with a metal buffer zone of approximately one meter in length. Despite this substantial cushioning element, the vehicle's body sustains severe damage, with the passenger compartment experiencing significant intrusion. This outcome raises questions about the vehicle's structural integrity and occupant protection capabilities.

[@zeroxzero159]

Now crash using Euro NCAP level testing.

[@mro_software]

these tests are harder than euro ncap

[@zeroxzero159]

@@mro_software really? I don't think so

[@xdriffatxd4196]

But they are tho​@@zeroxzero159

[@tlplayz_ytc8501]

@@mro_softwarenice joke

[@user-uu2lr1gs8r]

looks as dangerous as previously

[@SwordyNextGenerationReal]

While Its Better

[@MR_PY_CHEW]

Safety sucks

[@Gtr48]

Well that means your gonna die without safety

[@yuaninigoguamos6720]

Vans are better, its because the engine is in the cab (some vans)

[@AndiSuwito-z1p]

test with Alphard