All the models that were tested were about the same size though. I think the RX and GLE were classified as mid-size crossover SUVs and the Q7 and XC90 were both full-size models as they have a 3rd row and could seat people more comfortably, although the XT6, Aviator, and MDX come by default with a 3rd row. The X5 is also notably heavier than the RX.
The test shows how well can the car absorb impact so as to reduce chest injuries on rear dummy, notice the pressure sensor on the torso, while at the same time maintain the rigidity of the car structure so as not to injure the occupants inside.
Probably there are sensors in dummies that measures the energy of impact. But to eye, you can see dummies jumping less and hitting their heads less in the safer ones.
The updated test really focuses on rear passengers, whereas the old one didn't at all. Keep an eye out for "submarining," which is the passenger slipping under the lapbelt, thus potentially causing greater injury to the torso/internally.
I was one of the lucky ones because I waited until the kinks were out. It’s noted the aviator relaunch wasn’t the best, but they made it right for sure. 🇺🇸
I was surprised by the ratings of the Lexus RX., the BMW X3 and the Lincoln Aviator. I didn’t think the Lexus would be rated anything below Acceptable. And the Aviator, rated Good?! Very impressive!
Excellent video, much appreciated. It would be valuable to have some quick notes/comments shown for why a certain rating was given. Perhaps arrows superimposed on the video stills to indicate issues, like a wheel intrusion into footwell, etc., as most point reductions are not easily discerned. Thanks, 🙏
One reason I drive an Aviator but also because it’s the best riding suv out of all of these, unless you like a brick ride and hard seats. I drove all of these, other than the Cadillac, and the Lincoln was just more of a luxury car the way it drives and the stereo. 4 years with no issues is just a bonus.
I agree. I have the MKX which is the previous Gen before the Aviator. Love the seats. I had driven a VW previously and the seats were so hard I still don't think my back has recovered.
If u have GLE than bmw needs x5 , audi q7 and volvo xc90 to make this test fair ....btw i think Volvo xc 90 is the only car or suv in the world with 0 deaths since its launch
actually 0 deaths in America, i have seen some deaths and one video was horrific the volvo xc90 packed and it was said than the lady who was driving was more than 190km/h and hit a big tree
Volvo and Mercedes have always been at the forefront of crash safety and still are. There were some pretty disappointing results in their but, that's SUV's for you.
Yeah, except Mercedes has an unseen amount of repairs that are required outside of maintenance items. High amount of technology equals high amount of probable fixes and repairs lower technology, lower probability of fixes and repairs
@@Mario-R-3232 they are not compared to each other. The standards of the tests are independent of the vehicles. Poor is poor not matter the group they are in. They just happen to be in the same video.
Almighty Lexus “marginal” the almighty reliable, I’d rather be safe with a Volvo,bmw n Mercedes rather than focus on reliability with a Lexus. SAFETY FIRST! Life is important
Watch it again. Lexus was almost untouched. Front mask barely touched. It was even better than Volvo. Watch it carefully, mate. Watch and compare. To me Lexus has been the safest in this test.
You correct, but In any country that temperature not exceed 40c° , come to middle east and see what's happening here , and also see how big failure are our retailers services after sale for parts and maintenance pricing.
We can see here why crashes are so lethal, even if we have top safety measurements in place. Look at the side windows, they rip apart from the sheer force of stoppage. You can imagine how lightweight that specific component is and how much placement is in place when it rips apart. Rear passenger is injured 100% of the time when front crash happens. Neck overextends so much.
On my 8th Subaru Outback XT, almost had an xc90 but the truck suspension (wife flew in air middle of back seat during test drive 😅) and Corolla noise level threw me off… Volvo addressing those next year can’t wait!!!
Also had an Audi q7 on the garage for 1 day, returned it because my trifield emf meter was off the scale inside the Audi! Germans have strong you know what?😅
Bu bilgi yanlış.Volvo hala çok güvenli araç üretiyor.Ancak eskiden olduğu gibi şimdi de ülkemizde tercih edilmiyor.Çünkü biz parçası neredeyse markette bile bulunabilen yan sanayii yedek parçaları yaygın ve ucuz olan tenekeleri tercih etmeye devam ediyoruz
Birisi böyle bir sorundan bahsetti bana. Aşağıdaki alıntıya bak. Volvo'nun masrafı çok. 2017 yılından beri xc90 kullanıyorum aracın kullanımı ve konforu malzeme kalitesi gayet güzel ancak şu ana kadar özellikle şehir dışına çıktığımda muhakkak problem çıktı Direksiyon titremesi hiç bir zaman kesilmedi Servis her seferinde deneme yanılma çözümüyle ön takımda bir parça değiştirdi ancak bir türlü problem geçmedi ve araç 80 bin km geldi Yine şehir dışına çıktım aracın yağ eksildiğini uyarısını aldım ve altına yağ akıttığını gördüm Ankara’da servise gittim aracın bloğunun çatladığını tüm turboların öldüğünü şarj motorunun bittiğini şanzımanda seloneit valfimidir nedir kilitlendiğini parça değişemeyeceğini komple şanzıman değişmesi gerektiğini ve daha anlatamadığım bir sürü parça değişmesi gerektiğini söyledi Neden olmuş olabileceğini sorduğumda xc90 larda bu problemlerin olabildiğini şans deyip çıktılar Ayrıca düzenli resmî servisine km dolmadan düzenli servise götürdüğüm halde ve önceki servislerimde hiç bir uyarı çukmadığı halde 400 bin TL Ye zor kurtuldum Araç sıfır km oldu dediler teselli ettiler Volvo imajına yakışmayan bir aracım var Satmak istesem çok zarar ediyorum Ancak almak isteyenlerin iyi araştırıp servislere gidip xc90 ların motorlarının yerlerde darmadağan olduğunu kontrol etsinler öyle karar vermesini arzu ederim Bir daha asla Volvo almam
1. Почему разные классы? 2. Во всех авто все выживут. Что хорошо. 3. Вольво отработала лучше всех, есть ощущение запаса прочности. Переднее колесо не ушло от геометрии сильно.
Looks to me the Lexus was by far the worst. See how it twisted the dummies head around. Toyota sure has been blowing it these last few years in many different categories.
Bias? They did the XT5, RX, Q5, the GLC (edit: GLE), X3, aviator, XC60, RDX, Aviator. That’s a totally reasonable set of cars to evaluate. Infiniti, Genesis, Range Rover, Porsche, and EV makers were not present, but if you think it was biased, what would you have included? That said, I would like to know more about the actual scoring methodology. Also worth noting that in absolute terms, they’re all very safe. I didn’t see passenger cell intrusions or compromise in any of the three cars. We just constantly raise the bar. Although it is worth mentioning that the XC 60 was introduced in 2017, so it’s competing with a newer cohort.
it would've been more than just helpful if the reasons for the rating had been given as well.... why does a car where the kid's head is snagged by the airbag and severely stretched forward/down better rated than the car where that doesn't happen.
I have hard time to understand which suv is the safest and reliable. I don’t have money problems. Could someone send me which is the strongest and reliable suv for my new family to buy? Thank you
And now there is Kia EV9 from the "poor mans brand" getting same ratings or topping all of them in certain areas. Scoring full 5 stars and in side impact getting maximum ratings.
In simple terms, watch how many G forces are put on the test dummies. An easy way to notice this is by seeing how much they move around during impact. If you notice, as the ratings get higher the test dummies move around a lot less, especially the one in the rear.
Did you watch the video..? Cadillac did poor because it literally crumbled😂not surprised. Acura was acceptable and if you can’t see why then keep driving your Hyundai
So what is it based by,when most of the cars look the same atthe end of the test. I didn't think the Caddilac looked worse than a lot of the others. Can u tell us what the rati gs are based on. Surely not by what the vehicles look like
interesting that the cars with pre tensioners did the best the major of the low ratings are bc of submarining of the seatbelt so if they add pre tensioners it should bring them to a good rating
For right comparison,
X3 --> X5
Q5 --> Q7
XC60 ->> XC90
All models need to be in same class
전기차는 폭발의 위험이 있어서 실험을 안했다지?
All the models that were tested were about the same size though. I think the RX and GLE were classified as mid-size crossover SUVs and the Q7 and XC90 were both full-size models as they have a 3rd row and could seat people more comfortably, although the XT6, Aviator, and MDX come by default with a 3rd row. The X5 is also notably heavier than the RX.
@@B345T1N355Official they’re all midsize.
@@B345T1N355Official The GLE also has a third row. Just the X3 and the XC60 are Compact-SUVs.
@@B345T1N355Official GLE can’t be mid-size.
The test shows how well can the car absorb impact so as to reduce chest injuries on rear dummy, notice the pressure sensor on the torso, while at the same time maintain the rigidity of the car structure so as not to injure the occupants inside.
i'm not even surprised volvo is the first one with good ratings 😅
Volvo driver: "Did you feel something?"
Volvo: They're Boxy, but They're Good.
I don't feel my wallet due to maintenance costs
don't exaggerate .....
they absolutely freaking felt that
I didn't see anything special with volvo🤔
What are the general differences between ratings? Hard for my layman’s eye to distinguish.
Probably there are sensors in dummies that measures the energy of impact. But to eye, you can see dummies jumping less and hitting their heads less in the safer ones.
The updated test really focuses on rear passengers, whereas the old one didn't at all. Keep an eye out for "submarining," which is the passenger slipping under the lapbelt, thus potentially causing greater injury to the torso/internally.
Love my Lincoln Aviator. Happy to see it received the highest rating!!
Were you one of the lucky ones that didn't experience the onslaught of recalls the Aviator/Explorer had, and continue to?
@@fp5495Right - unlike many of the vehicles in this test. I’d take my chances in the Lincoln over the others.
There's a reason you don't see those (or any American car) in Europe. Even the Alabama built Mercedes SUV's have poor panel alignment.
Aviator owner here and have yet to be disappointed. It’s an incredibly smooth ride and just feels safe and comfortable. It would be hard to switch now
I was one of the lucky ones because I waited until the kinks were out. It’s noted the aviator relaunch wasn’t the best, but they made it right for sure. 🇺🇸
I have the XC60 and i love it 😊👌
What’s the demerits of having the XC60? Just wanna now
Nearly Chinese car...😊
@@youngmanchakeWhat is not chinese today? 🙈
@graysonalexander1071 better not in cars. Cars are not like toys or stuffs.
@@youngmanchakeSwedish built though.
4:33 GREAT JOB VOLVO!
My mom has a 2019 XC90 and I feel immortal in that car.
@@dylanofficial456 Świetny test, szkoda, że Volvo powinno konkurować z Q7 i BMW X7 i Mercedesem a nie z Q5, X3 i GLE 😂😂😂
Your mom earns quite a bit. What does she do for a living, if it's not a secret?
@@mocnywklikaniu to było Volvo xc60
Well done BMW Mercedes-Benz and Volvo .
Disappointed Audi
I saw a video like this of an A4 sedan (the older model, ca 2012). Man the whole dashboard came flying towards the front seats, crazy!
Horrible cars - high repair cost, high price and high chance of not surviving. That sums it up.
I was surprised by the ratings of the Lexus RX., the BMW X3 and the Lincoln Aviator.
I didn’t think the Lexus would be rated anything below Acceptable.
And the Aviator, rated Good?! Very impressive!
The testing company can be biased in favor of the European cars.
Excellent video, much appreciated. It would be valuable to have some quick notes/comments shown for why a certain rating was given. Perhaps arrows superimposed on the video stills to indicate issues, like a wheel intrusion into footwell, etc., as most point reductions are not easily discerned. Thanks, 🙏
Mostly back seat restraints. They didn’t keep the rear occupant in the seat.
One reason I drive an Aviator but also because it’s the best riding suv out of all of these, unless you like a brick ride and hard seats. I drove all of these, other than the Cadillac, and the Lincoln was just more of a luxury car the way it drives and the stereo. 4 years with no issues is just a bonus.
I agree. I have the MKX which is the previous Gen before the Aviator. Love the seats. I had driven a VW previously and the seats were so hard I still don't think my back has recovered.
If u have GLE than bmw needs x5 , audi q7 and volvo xc90 to make this test fair ....btw i think Volvo xc 90 is the only car or suv in the world with 0 deaths since its launch
actually 0 deaths in America, i have seen some deaths and one video was horrific the volvo xc90 packed and it was said than the lady who was driving was more than 190km/h and hit a big tree
@@winrarwin754 190 omg well thats too fast even for xc90
奔驰GL死亡率也是0，并没有什么意义
Volvo and Mercedes has always been my favorite when it comes to safety
This is harder to watch than drop testing expensive smartphones 😂
They must have changed the criteria of the test then? A few years ago, all of these would have been best picks.
That’s because now they’re focusing more on the rear passengers whereas in the older test, they did not do that
Volvo and Mercedes have always been at the forefront of crash safety and still are. There were some pretty disappointing results in their but, that's SUV's for you.
Да и Форд тоже. А вот Тойота почему-то сейчас низкие показатели(((
Yeah, except Mercedes has an unseen amount of repairs that are required outside of maintenance items. High amount of technology equals high amount of probable fixes and repairs lower technology, lower probability of fixes and repairs
Lexus still better that mercedes
Interesting video but remember that human body internal organs can only survive limited speed deceleration without damage.
This is my wife when she sees a sale. 😂
😄😄😄
Volvo and mercedes is good things, but the price not in same class
How did the Merc get a good rating when the "kid's" hand flew out and smash it's hand against the C pillar of the window? View 5:35 of video
Bc he is waving “Hi, im ok.” That’s why
应该是传感器的数据，但是无从知晓
Um cus there is wires inside the dummies that show how good is the safety on a car and how injured the dummy was
You cant compare, eg a GLE Mercedes with a X3 BMW, it's totally unfair. Try an X5 instead and see how things will change.
@@Mario-R-3232 they are not compared to each other. The standards of the tests are independent of the vehicles. Poor is poor not matter the group they are in. They just happen to be in the same video.
Man where is Genesis
Как по мне ,все авто прошли на отлично. Есть параметры которые нужны,для тестов и учета оценок,но ни как не влияющие на безопасность.
Ну вот,что и следовало доказать...,Вольво лидеры как ни крути,браво Вольво!!!
现在的Volvo 和过去不能相提并论。
So what is totoya doing in this test?
That is why I ride volvo xc60 in Germany !
No matter how safe a car is, public transport will always be the safest.
Almighty Lexus “marginal” the almighty reliable, I’d rather be safe with a Volvo,bmw n Mercedes rather than focus on reliability with a Lexus. SAFETY FIRST! Life is important
Watch it again. Lexus was almost untouched. Front mask barely touched. It was even better than Volvo. Watch it carefully, mate. Watch and compare. To me Lexus has been the safest in this test.
@@MrMartinHoldenyes while the driver was protected very well, the rear passenger wasn’t sadly
That start part is me in any video game that has car crash physics
Acura the best
Do they fix them afterwards 😂
Volvo is the best premium car ☺️
Most unreliable brand around😢😢😢
Too much movement, risk of secondary collisions.
@Charlie1776_ it is not a german car, so dont worry about 2nd collision 😃
You correct, but In any country that temperature not exceed 40c° , come to middle east and see what's happening here , and also see how big failure are our retailers services after sale for parts and maintenance pricing.
By a long way..Bought first Volvo...Far better built than any German, Japanese or Korean car
Say goodbye to the kids hand on the GLE. Good?
Swedis cars: Saab and Volvo, have a holistic view to safety...
@@serenan920😂😂😂 Are Saabs even produced anymore?
They open the window for the crash test, meaning if it weren't open, that likely would not have happened.
Cannot believe most of these vehicles received a Marginal Rating on the Moderate Overlap test.
Where has Genesis gone????
We can see here why crashes are so lethal, even if we have top safety measurements in place. Look at the side windows, they rip apart from the sheer force of stoppage. You can imagine how lightweight that specific component is and how much placement is in place when it rips apart. Rear passenger is injured 100% of the time when front crash happens. Neck overextends so much.
Lexus, Lincoln, Volvo, Audi, Mercedes ❤️🔥😮💨
It’s sad GM doesn’t make safer cars. I wonder if they intentionally decide to cheap out on safety.
Just safety? I almost feel sorry for people who choose to drive government motors.
@@Mark-eu6mc2 comments on this channel and you’ve already distinguished yourself!😂
@@pacmanc8103 gasp! An opinion 😉
@@Mark-eu6mc An opinion? Where’s the opinion?😮
@@pacmanc8103 oh it’s that GM sucks in case that flew over you lol
IS THE LITTLE GIRL IN THE BACK BEING DRAMATIC
Still going to pick the Lexus!
Keep er under 40 then
💎 Each item showcased oozes elegance and sophistication. The attention to detail is unparalleled, making it a true embodiment of luxury.
Okay, AI bot
@@fp5495Wow, I can see from your other comments you bring a lot to conversations.🥱
When does the Judge Dredd foam come out
Glad to see GM still knows how to give people a danger box
Volvo = safety
Surely you wouldn’t expect the Cadillac to be anything other than Poor? After all it is American.
American doesn’t mean unsafe
On my 8th Subaru Outback XT, almost had an xc90 but the truck suspension (wife flew in air middle of back seat during test drive 😅) and Corolla noise level threw me off… Volvo addressing those next year can’t wait!!!
Also had an Audi q7 on the garage for 1 day, returned it because my trifield emf meter was off the scale inside the Audi! Germans have strong you know what?😅
So basically all of them will Stephen hawking our kids in the back …that’s great
Interesting how the more safe cars bounce more after impact.
No context! WHY were they rated how they were?
🇺🇸🇬🇪🇺🇸🇬🇪🇺🇸🇬🇪 როგორც ყოველთვის ღმერთი ფარავდეს ამერიკას საუკუნიდან საუკუნამდე ამინ ძან შორეა ჩემგან ამერიკა მაგრამ ყველაზე უფრო მომეწონა კადილაკი.
Lincoln and Ford are the best.
For the most recalls in North America in 2023? Yes, not doubt, Lincoln and Ford are the best. Agreed.
@@fp5495Ah ‘most’ and ‘best’ are two different adjectives. The best for the most….hmmm.
The best at being the worst, obviously. After all, they are built in the USA.
@@merseyrailer7780 Troll😛
some cars' seatbelt don't even hold the passengers tightly on the seat.
That Lexus got scrambled quite deep
Volvo 4 ever ❤
Mercedes beat Volvo. Always have, Volvo is a very close second
Really? What video were you watching?
@@worrywart1311they both were rated good, but in my opinion I feel the passenger in the back of the Mercedes was slightly more stable
The Mercedes GLC is the comparable model to the Volvo XC60 and not the Mercedes GLE. GLE is comparable to the larger Volvo XC90.
Oh and once again Volvo infamous for the lights and hooks flying out of the headliner when the side airbag goes off
Bu bilgi yanlış.Volvo hala çok güvenli araç üretiyor.Ancak eskiden olduğu gibi şimdi de ülkemizde tercih edilmiyor.Çünkü biz parçası neredeyse markette bile bulunabilen yan sanayii yedek parçaları yaygın ve ucuz olan tenekeleri tercih etmeye devam ediyoruz
Birisi böyle bir sorundan bahsetti bana. Aşağıdaki alıntıya bak. Volvo'nun masrafı çok.
2017 yılından beri xc90 kullanıyorum aracın kullanımı ve konforu malzeme kalitesi gayet güzel ancak şu ana kadar özellikle şehir dışına çıktığımda muhakkak problem çıktı
Direksiyon titremesi hiç bir zaman kesilmedi
Servis her seferinde deneme yanılma çözümüyle ön takımda bir parça değiştirdi ancak bir türlü problem geçmedi ve araç 80 bin km geldi
Yine şehir dışına çıktım aracın yağ eksildiğini uyarısını aldım ve altına yağ akıttığını gördüm
Ankara’da servise gittim aracın bloğunun çatladığını tüm turboların öldüğünü şarj motorunun bittiğini şanzımanda seloneit valfimidir nedir kilitlendiğini parça değişemeyeceğini komple şanzıman değişmesi gerektiğini ve daha anlatamadığım bir sürü parça değişmesi gerektiğini söyledi
Neden olmuş olabileceğini sorduğumda xc90 larda bu problemlerin olabildiğini şans deyip çıktılar
Ayrıca düzenli resmî servisine km dolmadan düzenli servise götürdüğüm halde ve önceki servislerimde hiç bir uyarı çukmadığı halde
400 bin TL Ye zor kurtuldum
Araç sıfır km oldu dediler teselli ettiler
Volvo imajına yakışmayan bir aracım var
Satmak istesem çok zarar ediyorum
Ancak almak isteyenlerin iyi araştırıp servislere gidip xc90 ların motorlarının yerlerde darmadağan olduğunu kontrol etsinler öyle karar vermesini arzu ederim
Bir daha asla Volvo almam
very surprised by lincoln
1. Почему разные классы?
2. Во всех авто все выживут. Что хорошо.
3. Вольво отработала лучше всех, есть ощущение запаса прочности. Переднее колесо не ушло от геометрии сильно.
Why was the Lincoln's front driver's side wheel locked up for so many yards before impact?
That seems sketchy.
BMW and Volvo TOP !
Why GLE instead of GLC?
Why GLC instead of GLE ?😂
Lexus gets a crappy rating 😂 that’s how you know they’re not 1 for safety
Lexus are pants now...can't make brakes, either. Would not drive one for free
In my opinion, they also look super outdated, especially in the interior.
Try a crash test with the Audi Q7 4L. Then you understand what a safe car is. 😉
@@prokomi1208 I was hit from behind by a semi truck, and I only bounced forward and had minimal damage to the rear.
Different classes of cars. Mercedes should be a GLC model. Lincoln has a Nautilus model. And this turns out to be a not entirely correct comparison.
After many videos watching with crash car testing , the best car is RAZVANI SUV TANC
WITH ALL RESPECT FOR TRUTH AND KNOWLEDGE
Mercedes 💪
5:45 what is that
Looks to me the Lexus was by far the worst. See how it twisted the dummies head around. Toyota sure has been blowing it these last few years in many different categories.
The test dummy in the back keeps frantically raising its arm demanding no more I think. Not so dumb after all.
Hand picked models to show unfair results. Good to see ppl in comments recognized that
Bias? They did the XT5, RX, Q5, the GLC (edit: GLE), X3, aviator, XC60, RDX, Aviator. That’s a totally reasonable set of cars to evaluate.
Infiniti, Genesis, Range Rover, Porsche, and EV makers were not present, but if you think it was biased, what would you have included?
That said, I would like to know more about the actual scoring methodology. Also worth noting that in absolute terms, they’re all very safe. I didn’t see passenger cell intrusions or compromise in any of the three cars. We just constantly raise the bar. Although it is worth mentioning that the XC 60 was introduced in 2017, so it’s competing with a newer cohort.
@YouCarTV Proud of Indian car companies ( Tata and Mahindra) could have given tough compitition to these cars
it would've been more than just helpful if the reasons for the rating had been given as well.... why does a car where the kid's head is snagged by the airbag and severely stretched forward/down better rated than the car where that doesn't happen.
XC90과 X5, 카이앤이 보고 싶은데~
What was the speed of these Suv's conducting the test?
Mercedes Benz safe car
I have hard time to understand which suv is the safest and reliable. I don’t have money problems. Could someone send me which is the strongest and reliable suv for my new family to buy? Thank you
XC90 recharge
Not really sure where your classifications come from. Totally different from all other test results done by government and insurance companies!
And now there is Kia EV9 from the "poor mans brand" getting same ratings or topping all of them in certain areas. Scoring full 5 stars and in side impact getting maximum ratings.
Man sollte schon Autos gleicher Fahrzeuggröße wählen, nimmt man einen Mercedes GLE, müsste es bei BMW ein X5 oder X6 sein, sonst ist es unfair.
2024 and cars are still performing poorly...but lets keep adding screens into the car, rather than putting that money towards making the car safer
Why no infiniti tested?
....scoring???
Where is Infiniti
Sponsored by VOLVO.
為何不研發在前座椅後方安裝氣囊，連動後座的重量感應器，當後座有人時打開氣囊，減少後座乘客頸部甩動的傷害。
1.) Cost
2.) Ford use to make inflatable seatbelts for the F-150 limited prior to 2021 I believe. Not sure if they ever really took off though
3) front seat can move, making the air bag either useless or dangerous in many cases
4) baby seat in back seat with infant could make air bag lethal
Volvos are the best in terms of safety
Tell me someone how ratings it’s work?
In simple terms, watch how many G forces are put on the test dummies. An easy way to notice this is by seeing how much they move around during impact. If you notice, as the ratings get higher the test dummies move around a lot less, especially the one in the rear.
How did cadillac do poor but acura marginal
Did you watch the video..? Cadillac did poor because it literally crumbled😂not surprised. Acura was acceptable and if you can’t see why then keep driving your Hyundai
@@dphotography8 What a dumb answer. No, it was actually mind-numbingly dumb.
@@fp5495Mind-numbingly? Really?
So what is it based by,when most of the cars look the same atthe end of the test. I didn't think the Caddilac looked worse than a lot of the others. Can u tell us what the rati gs are based on. Surely not by what the vehicles look like
@davidd1692 yeah didn’t make sense to me either
audi q5 like anti infantry mine, dropping very small plastic details in every direction, even people near can be injured
Why they do not use same car s size GLE , X3 (should have use x5)
interesting that the cars with pre tensioners did the best
the major of the low ratings are bc of submarining of the seatbelt so if they add pre tensioners it should bring them to a good rating
My heart is beating fast bcos of new car crashing
I heard that They crash 1 car everyday at volvo for safety test
All cars same 5 stars.
Volvo …👍😉
Cuando pagar seguro
Hummer h2 ❤
Poor Cadillac
How about Citroen
Not sold in the US Market.
@@MBG141And given away in most other markets.