#askeck This photo may interest you: vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/b/be/Death_Star_Drydock.JPG/revision/latest?cb=20070222140438 It shows the Death Star drydock with and ISD and SSD under construction.
About Empire at War (not Force of Corruption) mods: What is the most stable mod you've played? What is the most lore friendly you've played? Do you know a mod that keeps Pirates while removing the yellow cloud corruption mechanic from FoC?
#AskEck That art at 0:47 was made after Episode 2 right? Because of the Acclamator looking vessel I was thinking it was unless it was a coincidence from before the film was made...
Indeed. And a mobile drydock (possibly with limited shipyard facilities) would be absolutely invaluable for force projection. Beats having to send damaged or older ships all the way to Kuat.
@@hoodratv3 The Death Star, in both Ep. IV and Ep. VI, were referred to as "stations" (i.e the space equivalent of planetary bases). If the Death Stars were *just* superweapons, there would've been no reason to construct the massive shell and all of the internal compartments within it that were necessary to house and sustain a population of two million people around the superlaser.
By that logic they could have done the same for most of their fleet as most of the ships can carry some form of smaller ship. At smallest a TIE fighter.
@@kevinshu4883 It may be stupid but we are talking about bureaucracies here, they're known to do all sorts of stupid things simply because it might have made sense to do at one time and were never told to stop doing it.
@@Riceball01 Except the Empire is a dictatorship. Bureaucracy is still everywhere, but that's mainly because the Empire is just far too large for one person to micromanage. Any pet projects of the Emperor, like the Death Star, would almost certainly be free of any red tape or bureaucracy, aside for the most token of gestures.
@@TJackson736 That's why it's mobile. Just GTFO! somewhere away from whatever. While the the Star Destroyers is use to hold the enemy at bay. I mean I prefer it over the Harpers Queen mother mothership.
@@jpham1026 Well actually the exhaust is fine as it is. Unless you have force powers or suicidal. There's no way in hell can those torpedo turn complete 90 degrees straight down the hole without assistance from something at those speed.
While it was never mentioned in the movies, why wouldn't it? It's a station, so naturally, it should be able to dock all kinds of ships, and it's certainly big enough. AT MINIMUM, id expect it to be able to supply and repair it's escort fleet.
Honestly, I always though of the Death Star as a moving Space Station with a Super Weapon, it wouldnt be crazy to think it would come with the ability to build new ISDs in case its ISD escort fleet was destroyed, lost or relocated.
Oh my goodness, you have a great eye! 👍 In my own head canon the Death Star could do that, but I would have never recognized that scene if it wasn’t pointed out.
I always assumed that when that Imperial officer was telling Tarkin that his ship was standing by to evacuate at Yavin, he was referring to a Star Destroyer, which I further assumed was docked within the Death Star.
When the game Force Unleashed was lunch one picture used as art conceptual for the game was a picture of a Star Destroyer under construction inside a hangar of the Death Star.
Speaking of the Tarkin Doctrine and wanting a Death Star in every sector, I remember the first Star Wars Infinities comic series where it showed dozens of "Justice Stars" orbiting Coruscant for a celebration.
In the X-wing series (Legends) the Empire admitted his death but claimed he was trying to plea with the Rebels to not build THEIR Death Star and he and Vader sacrificed themselves to to stop them
In canon the empire tried in some systems to dismiss the claims for his death by making propaganda on how "the rebels failed" with the attack on the DS 2". An example for this is the iron blockade in the anoat sector where they blocked the systems so that no one learns about his death.
McBoonta’s Burgers! Popular throughout the Core and Midrim; franchises are just popping up in the Outer Rim. What the burgers are made of varies depending on planet; with the exception of the vegetarian “Jedi Special” (some Jedi think it’s a galactic plot to help identify Jedi; even though vegetarians across the galaxy order it).
Not Eco but I can say covenant weaponry is deadlier. It goes onto detail on the books about how a single shot would burn through the armor and get the flesh inside. While SW blaster do this as well, we see how a shot to the arm, whole burning it, leaves it still in place and somewhat operational. In halo the plasma would burn your arm down to the bone, and it would fall off. Not to mention the splash damage that might catch others.
I'd say Star Wars blasters, for a few reasons. Star Wars blaster bolts are more often depicted travelling faster than Halo plasma bolts. Halo plasma weaponry may be more destructive on a shot-for-shot basis, but their bolts' slow speed would make them inherently less accurate than a blaster. You can physically see a plasma bolt coming, and move to avoid it or duck behind cover. While blaster bolts - though not moving quite as fast as regular Earthly bullets - seem to move faster than any human could reasonably react to. Less accuracy = less reliability in landing one's shots. Less reliable hits = more wasted ammo, which adds up to a massive drain on military resources over time. Furthermore, Halo plasma weapons demand their users get very, very close to their targets before they can reliably hit anything. Within about 30-40 metres or so. An English war bow from the Middle Ages could shoot further than that. Meanwhile Earthly infantry rifles can hit and kill targets up to 500 metres away. Star Wars blasters seem to have comparable effective ranges, though we've never got definite numbers as far as I know. And Star Wars blasters don't seem to suffer from bullet-drop, which would only make them easier for infantry to aim effectively. Oh yes, and Star Wars blasters are more often depicted as having iron-sights or optics mounted on them, so the user could actually aim them accurately. Meanwhile, hardly any Covenant plasma weapons have iron sights, optics, or aiming assists of any kind. So a user of such weapons couldn't even reliably hit a stationary target with a single shot.
#AskEck I have a pretty unique suggestion for a ship for you to cover. The battleship Halberd form ssb/kirby. WAIT DON’T LEAVE JUST HEAR ME OUT. I find this ship to quite interesting. And surprisingly powerful. When you first look at the ship you see that it is completely COVERED in weapons. And upon further inspection you see that the weapons are pretty well placed and allow the weapons to focus their firepower on a target in front of it. And also has weapons facing backwards and side. The weapon placement provides full coverage. The ship has no blind spots. Speaking of weaponry, the guns are Very powerful and varied. We have seen the cannons fire flak shells, beams, and pulsed energy projectiles in the games and even managed to shoot down Dyna blade. Which we have seen tank multiple large explosions without any visible damage. It was also able to destroy three Destroyas, which have shields that could easily shrug off artillery powerful enough to knock a meteor off course. However the most impressive weapon in its arsenal is the Combo Cannon. It has both an extremely powerful superlaser, and a large cannon.ua-cam.com/video/JRmJV-g-so0/v-deo.html The defensive feats are not AS impressive.(the ship has been destroyed multiple times). The is said to have a shield, but it is only mentioned and is never actually shown (make of that what you will). However the armor is extremely durable. It took three shots from a cannon that was physically larger than the ship itself. However its most impressive feature has to be its absurd speed and maneuverability:. Despite being a ~400 meter ship with a full crew it moves like a starfighter. The engines and hull are even powerful enough to ram another ship, as seen here: ua-cam.com/video/on3CAKYK2L8/v-deo.html Supa speed:ua-cam.com/video/XKHQXuXE8qc/v-deo.html But who am I kidding this is a dumb suggestion right?
I've always thought that the Death Star(s) had some sort of capital-ship docking capability. After all, neither of them had actual sublight engines, only a hyperdrive. So I always thought they would get tugged/pushed into position by a compliment of ISDs. The orientation of the one in that shot from Rogue One (i.e - engines away from the station), would definitely support this idea. Similarly, I always thought the Stars had at least some sort of production capability, for both starfighters and larger ships.
I mean the star destroyer docking bay is where they build it, a star destroyer is the capital of the fleet. It is used as a vehicle, but also used as an office. The death star is more of a home however the star destroyer stays in space, it moves as the fleet moves, the tie fighters are made for transport but a star destroyer is used more as a captain.
Well you have to consider the death star wasn't ever really "operational" it was always basically in what the navy would call "shakedown cruise" if you had one that was in service for say a decade or more I'm sure having a ship yard and a multitude of features that was never dreamed of in film would come to be.
Makes sense. Iserlohrn Fortress from Legend of Galactic Heroes is of similar size and power to DS, though not mobile. It’s essentially a full service naval base capable of servicing its organic defense fleet.
No star destroyers at Yavin is one of those Fridge Logic things you don't think of until well after you watched the movie. It would have made sense for the Death Star to carry ISDs and deploy them to intercept rebel ships trying to escape Yavin... which, strangely, they didn't try to do. In real life, the explanation likely is that nobody thought of it, and they wouldn't have had the FX budget anyway. The best in-universe explanation that I can come up with is that the newly completed Death Star had yet to receive its full complement of ISDs, and the ones it did have were dispatched to Dantooine to deal with Princess Leia's fictional base.
No, it's not contradictory, because the resources put into building the DS battlestations still prevented the construction of many, many conventional ships.
So in your mind a rivalry means these various admirals and military leaders are going to disobey the emperor when he says “park your fucking ships in this battle station!” ? Besides, we do see the fleet acting in support of Death Star 2. So if anything hard canon shits all over this supposed rivalry if you think it means ships and stations somehow can’t mix🤷♂️
I think you hit a key point about seeing PART of a star destroyer. My belief is that it was also used to house PARTS of a star destroyer so it was a portable maintenance station too.
It has at least one full drydock capable of full ship construction. It may also have what you mentioned, but I do think that was simply the rear view of a complete star destroyer. Examples of parts of star destroyers would be spare turbolasers and engines down to nuts and bolts, not an entire complete rear of a star destroyer. How often is there going to be a situation where you need to replace the entire rear of an ISD? Damage that catastrophic would blow the whole ship up.
Imagine if there was a whole fleet of SDs and support ships docked inside, and deployed during the fourth movie. I don't think even Luke could've gotten through that...
Hmmm maybe do them separately. Androids are self aware machines and cyborgs are people that are part machine. I read a paper in my collage biology classes that considered people with pace makers as cyborgs. My question is are droids androids?
1: If capital ships can make hyperspace jumps with fighters docked in their hangars, the Death Star should certainly be capable of the same even with Star Destroyers. 2: I don't feel that "indirect kills" should count for a pilot's total. Isn't taking down a Death Star enough of an achievement? :D 3: I could see the Death Star's massive hangars being able to repair and resupply capital ships, but building a whole vessel from scratch is probably outside the scope of the station. I'd actually be curious to know how self-sufficient the Death Star was intended to be. The amount of materials and components needed just to maintain the thing has to be absolutely staggering.
Eck, I was listening to the video while walking around my room and doing stuff, and I look out my room, I see a full moon, and my heart skipped a beat before I realized what I was truly looking at.
don't forget the the Comic Book Visionaris, which gave us also the image of the Death Star Drydock, housing not only several ISDs, but also an Exekutor SSD. And i always thought that the ISD in ANH would be docked, given that angle it approached the Death Star
Back from liking some japanese stuff ( not the extremley popular ones like anime and manga) and man I forgot how joyful and calming your intro was, and how much I loved your vids.
A very long time ago, even before the Prequels, there was talk about the unfinished part of the Death Star 2 was hangers for the Imperial fleet. That's why it was fully operational and yet incomplete. But that was a nice catch from Rogue One.
It was a mobile shipyard and naval base. It could support a fleet of Star Destroyers allowing the Death Star to dominate a sector without showing its self
In The Force Unleashed videogame, the final stage takes place in the unfinished Death Star 1. As you walk from the entrance of one the hangars towards the inner sections, you can see plenty of star destroyers docked inside the station. They could be taking part in the construction process, or they could be actually stationed there.
When I was a kid, you know every kid goes utterly insane with their creations? I used to imagine a death star so insanely big it would have a ring of super destroyers docked all around it
If you look at the headsets you see jedi wearing when piloting both kinds of Jedi starfighter they wrap around the forehead. I remember reading somewhere that this was supposed to be an experimental neural interface that jedi were able to make work because they were force sensitive while "normal" pilots usually weren't. This allowed for much quicker reactions and more complex maneuvers than manual fighter controls would otherwise permit.
when the death star goes into hyperspace all support ships including many star destroyers dock within the death stars shell therefore saving fuel and also allowing for huge assault on any target .repairs and arming can take place during transit and also allowing crews some rest and relaxation time with friends and family who lived and worked full time on the death star .
Makes sense actually, "Battlesstation", not much of one if it's really just their verses version to an extremely odd an large shaped A-10 Warthog, an built around the main gun. A space station of THAT size should I'd imagine also be able to not only house huge ships like Star Destroyers but launch, fit, repair and perhaps even make them.. Thatd be disheartening to even a large Vong fleet.. moving in to attack the Death Star which only looks fairly unprotected and then suddenly parts open up an an Armada of large SDs sail out accompanied by swarms of TIEs and support ships of every type and size.. Thatd be pretty much EVERY other SW factions Worst nightmare case scenario. I believe Vong agents even hinted as much. An you had to know such scenarios kept Rebel Leadership awake at night for years
I remember the old book that said that the death star didn’t just have big star destroyer hangers, it’s actually a dry dock, yup they are manufacturing star destroyers in there as well
I always thought the sheer scale of the Death Star was a bit hard to swallow. A 120-km sphere would have an absolutely massive volume and mass, far more than would be required for housing a planet-killing weapon. Even cutting it down to 60km would still be utterly gargantuan, and I don't think even a mobile shipyard would be enough to justify that kind of size.
#AskEck This question ties in with the one from this episode. If Eta-2 starfighters are only piloted by jedi and not clones, why does a standard Venator carry around 192 of them, when they could just use about 10 Eta-2 and fill the space with ARC-170 or V-wings?
Interesting. And honestly all of this would make sense. The Death stars were such massive bases that like Eck says, giving them docking/repair bays big enough for Star Destroyers makes sense. Besides, it would probably end up saving money and it's not like this wasn't already a massive drain on the economy. Might as well make the totally indestructible planet killing bases carry the defense fleet. Heck, if the Tarkin doctrine worked then they could keep the smaller ships docked there almost permanently and save money there as well as no one would dare oppose the Empire.
The scene of the Death Star trench when Krennic departs, clearly does show a docked Imperial Star Destroyer. However, after reading all the technical companions and guides, it stated nothing larger than a Strike Cruiser was carried. Food for thought.
I honestly did notice this myself, but I had to rewatch it several times just to make sure I wasn't seeing things. I was wondering when one of my star wars channels was going to bring this up. Good eye sir!
The empires lack of widespread implementation of dedicated flak frigates is one of their most glaring oversights. Compared to the cost of an Imp class adding a pair of raiders for CIWS duty would have paid in dividends far beyond the expenses of their operation.
A space station of that size would probably require massive ships to ferry supplies and crew back and forth. You would probably want to carry around several large transport ships in case you have need of them for supplies, to transfer troops, to aid in a large scale evacuation from the Death Star or to the Death Star. It wouldn't be a large stretch to design into the Death Start the ability to provide hangars and docking for Star Destroyer sized ships.
Honestly for a station as big as the Death Star I think ISD sized docks would be necessary. Even if it didn’t have an escort fleet I think you’d need them just for the operation of the station. I mean think about how much stuff probably has to go in and out of the station every single day. Trying to move all those materials and assets exclusively with small transports would be a logistical nightmare. In addition to a defensive fleet around the station there probably is an enormous fleet of cargo carriers constantly coming and going around the clock. Even with all the hangars we see on the station I’d imagine that most ships would be under a lot of pressure to move their cargo as quickly as possible and undock for the next ship to come in. Thinking about it now getting the station ready for hyperspace would be quite the involved and disruptive process. You’d have to communicate with hundreds of ships. Once a hyperspace route was chosen you’d have to clear out every ship from the station’s path. You’d have to reroute or reschedule who knows how many arrivals and departures. Just getting the station ready for hyperspace would probably take at least a few hours. And the fact that Darth Vader can dock his ISD whenever he wants for however long he wants is just another demonstration of how much authority he commands.
Very Large Hangers on the death star make sense. For a station that size, the amount of supplies required would be massive. So very large cargo ships would need somewhere to dock and offload bulk cargo efficiently and an umbilical or cargo transfer by tug would be slower than direct offloading.
If the rebellion was able to capture a Star destroyer they could fill it with some heavy/high explosive and possibly get an imperial traitor to get the ship into the Death Star and have it explode.
Yes, DS1 has shipyard capabilities but its not a dedicated shipyard, that job is left to orbital shipyard with the logistical infrastructure to supply it. Very likely the DS will do refits and resupply since its intended to be a mobile battle station and the capital ship docks hold its defense fleet ready to launch
If you search for "Death Star Drydock" there is an early artwork with docked Star Destroyers and even a Super Star Destroyer inside the Death Star . I was always fascinated of this Idea :-)
It’s so funny, I was just watching rogue one and that scene had brought me to this video... I didn’t notice the star destroyer but it brought the question to my mind
It's supposed to be a "station" so like Space Dock in Star Trek I see it making sense for refit/resupply/shore leave for Star ships. Something so big would make sense to be the hub of the large battle fleet that would be needed to escort it.
There is actually a level on the PSP version of the force unleash when you first board the DS and you can see ISDs docked with the station’s internal superstructure as you are advancing through the external walkways. As for the station’s ability to carry a fleet inside, I think it’s actually very possible that the DS could at the very least carry and support an escort fleet if not a larger battle group given its sheer size. If so it elevates the strategic value and impact of the DS that’s stops been just a planet killer and also becomes a gigantic assault platform.
From the very first Star Wars, I always thought that The Death Star would act as a fully functioning replacement for planetary assets. It would have dry docks and everything for the repair of ISDs, even potential to build one from scartch. Rec spaces for crews, etc.
Yeah, it does make sense. I thought there was an old concept art of showing this exact feature way before canon outright confirms it but it's been wayyyy long since I saw that...unless that was all in my head.
I imagine that a Death Star full of Star Destroyers was part of Plapatine's ultimate plan, but much like replacing every TIE Fighter with TIE Interceptors is something that was never fully realized as most of those Star Destroyers were always needed elsewhere so only a few were ever docked at a time. Still, if Palpatine had won at Endor, I imagine your idea of a Death Star full of Star Destroyers in every sector would be his endgame plan. I wonder how Thrawn would feel about the project then.
The Yoden Mod has a dreadnought sized GR-75 with a super laser. Yep. ua-cam.com/video/NLXyYuplXMA/v-deo.html
#AskEck
*Attempt 497*
*Faction versus suggestion*
The Forerunners vs Warhammer 40k factions.
Your resistance is futile.
#askeck This photo may interest you: vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/b/be/Death_Star_Drydock.JPG/revision/latest?cb=20070222140438
It shows the Death Star drydock with and ISD and SSD under construction.
About Empire at War (not Force of Corruption) mods:
What is the most stable mod you've played?
What is the most lore friendly you've played?
Do you know a mod that keeps Pirates while removing the yellow cloud corruption mechanic from FoC?
#AskEck That art at 0:47 was made after Episode 2 right? Because of the Acclamator looking vessel I was thinking it was unless it was a coincidence from before the film was made...
@@26th_Primarch No, Dark Empire was made in the early 90's.
The next time the SSD Executor tries to dock with the DS2, it should probably request clearance first.
And actually, aim for a hanger instead of trying to make one itself lol
Only because piett was a fool
Ever notice how you can't see a curve in that scene? Flat death star confirmed! Either that or its bigger than an actual planet.
@@DeathBYDesign666 or maybe its a moon.
@@awhahoo that's not a moon -obi wan kenobi
I honestly never thought about this, but it makes sense. Honestly it would be strange if it didn't carry them.
True, Star Destroyers do need refit and resupply.
Indeed. And a mobile drydock (possibly with limited shipyard facilities) would be absolutely invaluable for force projection. Beats having to send damaged or older ships all the way to Kuat.
yeah. it makes sense. i mean it is a base.
Evil Ash It’s not a base, it’s a super weapon.
@@hoodratv3 The Death Star, in both Ep. IV and Ep. VI, were referred to as "stations" (i.e the space equivalent of planetary bases).
If the Death Stars were *just* superweapons, there would've been no reason to construct the massive shell and all of the internal compartments within it that were necessary to house and sustain a population of two million people around the superlaser.
See, the Empire included that feature so they could claim the tax write off for also being a transport. Smart credits makes credits.
By that logic they could have done the same for most of their fleet as most of the ships can carry some form of smaller ship. At smallest a TIE fighter.
Lol. I'm 90% sure your joking, but in case you're not, it would be stupid unnecessary bureaucracy for a government to tax its own spending.
@@kevinshu4883 It may be stupid but we are talking about bureaucracies here, they're known to do all sorts of stupid things simply because it might have made sense to do at one time and were never told to stop doing it.
@@Riceball01 Except the Empire is a dictatorship. Bureaucracy is still everywhere, but that's mainly because the Empire is just far too large for one person to micromanage. Any pet projects of the Emperor, like the Death Star, would almost certainly be free of any red tape or bureaucracy, aside for the most token of gestures.
I'm pretty sure that "nationalized" assets and projects are tax exempt.
It's call a space station for a reason. The big death laser is just a bonus. Honestly it makes a great emergency capital in case Corruscant falls.
Or is destroyed to the point of not being usable as a capital
@@TJackson736 That's why it's mobile. Just GTFO! somewhere away from whatever. While the the Star Destroyers is use to hold the enemy at bay. I mean I prefer it over the Harpers Queen mother mothership.
Well it *might* work assuming they cover up that exhaust port with something.
@@jpham1026 Well actually the exhaust is fine as it is. Unless you have force powers or suicidal. There's no way in hell can those torpedo turn complete 90 degrees straight down the hole without assistance from something at those speed.
@@dariustiapula apparently has seen the Death Star Architect Speaks Out ua-cam.com/video/agcRwGDKulw/v-deo.html
While it was never mentioned in the movies, why wouldn't it?
It's a station, so naturally, it should be able to dock all kinds of ships, and it's certainly big enough.
AT MINIMUM, id expect it to be able to supply and repair it's escort fleet.
Honestly, I always though of the Death Star as a moving Space Station with a Super Weapon, it wouldnt be crazy to think it would come with the ability to build new ISDs in case its ISD escort fleet was destroyed, lost or relocated.
it should have been mentioned
@@gasmaskgaming7550
Why?
What's your reasoning?
I kinda always thought when the Devastator first approached the Death Star in ANH that it was docking. Looks like this was the case.
I agree. Also, the quote about having Tarkin's ship standing by now makes more sense.
Imagine, They actually put that obscure background detail there just so somebody could pick it up and realize...
They lost a planet buster, a station, a shipyard. They essentially lost a whole planet
@@bogustoast22none25 Sounds like they put all their eggs in one basket. What a shame.
Oh my goodness, you have a great eye! 👍 In my own head canon the Death Star could do that, but I would have never recognized that scene if it wasn’t pointed out.
I still can’t see it :/
I also can't see it.
I cant see it either
I always assumed that when that Imperial officer was telling Tarkin that his ship was standing by to evacuate at Yavin, he was referring to a Star Destroyer, which I further assumed was docked within the Death Star.
Man, even for Tarkin, that would be some hubris just letting a Star Destroyer sit in its hanger during an attack.
“Your overconfidence is your weakness.”
I always imagined the ship he was referring to was some luxury space yacht.
@@screamingcactus1753 makes sense for Tarkin, though. Dude was notoriously arrogant.
but he said it was an escape pod
When the game Force Unleashed was lunch one picture used as art conceptual for the game was a picture of a Star Destroyer under construction inside a hangar of the Death Star.
There's a part in the wii version where you can see one inside a giant hanger.
@@justice9539 i believe in the ps2 version as well.
Mr skelebone same game, just different platforms.
In the PSP version there's a whole bunch of them docked inside.
Yeah but game can be different depending on what console you're playing on. In the PSP version you can see star Destroyers in the Death Star.
Speaking of the Tarkin Doctrine and wanting a Death Star in every sector, I remember the first Star Wars Infinities comic series where it showed dozens of "Justice Stars" orbiting Coruscant for a celebration.
#AskEck
How did the Empire tried to cover up Palpatine's Death in Canon and Legends?
In the X-wing series (Legends) the Empire admitted his death but claimed he was trying to plea with the Rebels to not build THEIR Death Star and he and Vader sacrificed themselves to to stop them
The empire covered it by telling he died because of a heart stroke
The he exploded
In canon the empire tried in some systems to dismiss the claims for his death by making propaganda on how "the rebels failed" with the attack on the DS 2". An example for this is the iron blockade in the anoat sector where they blocked the systems so that no one learns about his death.
#askeck are there any intergalactic fast food restaurants in the Star Wars galaxy? Like an intergalactic chick fil a?
Day 7
Well there is one joint called Power Sliders on Abafar in TCW. Seems to be a hamburger bar :)
Don't know about fast food. But, I hear the Death Star food court serves a great pasta penne arrabbiata.
Episode 2... obiwan goes to the fast food diner
McBoonta’s Burgers! Popular throughout the Core and Midrim; franchises are just popping up in the Outer Rim. What the burgers are made of varies depending on planet; with the exception of the vegetarian “Jedi Special” (some Jedi think it’s a galactic plot to help identify Jedi; even though vegetarians across the galaxy order it).
Jim’s Coleslaw Shack
#AskEck
Star Wars Blasters vs Halo Plasma Weaponry. Which one do you think is objectively better?
Not Eco but I can say covenant weaponry is deadlier.
It goes onto detail on the books about how a single shot would burn through the armor and get the flesh inside.
While SW blaster do this as well, we see how a shot to the arm, whole burning it, leaves it still in place and somewhat operational.
In halo the plasma would burn your arm down to the bone, and it would fall off. Not to mention the splash damage that might catch others.
I'd say Star Wars blasters, for a few reasons.
Star Wars blaster bolts are more often depicted travelling faster than Halo plasma bolts. Halo plasma weaponry may be more destructive on a shot-for-shot basis, but their bolts' slow speed would make them inherently less accurate than a blaster. You can physically see a plasma bolt coming, and move to avoid it or duck behind cover. While blaster bolts - though not moving quite as fast as regular Earthly bullets - seem to move faster than any human could reasonably react to. Less accuracy = less reliability in landing one's shots. Less reliable hits = more wasted ammo, which adds up to a massive drain on military resources over time.
Furthermore, Halo plasma weapons demand their users get very, very close to their targets before they can reliably hit anything. Within about 30-40 metres or so. An English war bow from the Middle Ages could shoot further than that. Meanwhile Earthly infantry rifles can hit and kill targets up to 500 metres away. Star Wars blasters seem to have comparable effective ranges, though we've never got definite numbers as far as I know. And Star Wars blasters don't seem to suffer from bullet-drop, which would only make them easier for infantry to aim effectively.
Oh yes, and Star Wars blasters are more often depicted as having iron-sights or optics mounted on them, so the user could actually aim them accurately. Meanwhile, hardly any Covenant plasma weapons have iron sights, optics, or aiming assists of any kind. So a user of such weapons couldn't even reliably hit a stationary target with a single shot.
The Death Star is one thick boi if that's the case.
Now that I think about it, it so is possible and probably good and compulsory.
#AskEck
I have a pretty unique suggestion for a ship for you to cover. The battleship Halberd form ssb/kirby. WAIT DON’T LEAVE JUST HEAR ME OUT. I find this ship to quite interesting. And surprisingly powerful.
When you first look at the ship you see that it is completely COVERED in weapons. And upon further inspection you see that the weapons are pretty well placed and allow the weapons to focus their firepower on a target in front of it. And also has weapons facing backwards and side. The weapon placement provides full coverage. The ship has no blind spots. Speaking of weaponry, the guns are Very powerful and varied. We have seen the cannons fire flak shells, beams, and pulsed energy projectiles in the games and even managed to shoot down Dyna blade. Which we have seen tank multiple large explosions without any visible damage. It was also able to destroy three Destroyas, which have shields that could easily shrug off artillery powerful enough to knock a meteor off course. However the most impressive weapon in its arsenal is the Combo Cannon. It has both an extremely powerful superlaser, and a large cannon.ua-cam.com/video/JRmJV-g-so0/v-deo.html
The defensive feats are not AS impressive.(the ship has been destroyed multiple times). The is said to have a shield, but it is only mentioned and is never actually shown (make of that what you will). However the armor is extremely durable. It took three shots from a cannon that was physically larger than the ship itself.
However its most impressive feature has to be its absurd speed and maneuverability:. Despite being a ~400 meter ship with a full crew it moves like a starfighter. The engines and hull are even powerful enough to ram another ship, as seen here: ua-cam.com/video/on3CAKYK2L8/v-deo.html
Supa speed:ua-cam.com/video/XKHQXuXE8qc/v-deo.html
But who am I kidding this is a dumb suggestion right?
I've always thought that the Death Star(s) had some sort of capital-ship docking capability. After all, neither of them had actual sublight engines, only a hyperdrive. So I always thought they would get tugged/pushed into position by a compliment of ISDs. The orientation of the one in that shot from Rogue One (i.e - engines away from the station), would definitely support this idea. Similarly, I always thought the Stars had at least some sort of production capability, for both starfighters and larger ships.
I mean the star destroyer docking bay is where they build it, a star destroyer is the capital of the fleet. It is used as a vehicle, but also used as an office. The death star is more of a home however the star destroyer stays in space, it moves as the fleet moves, the tie fighters are made for transport but a star destroyer is used more as a captain.
I love the idea of carrying and deploying star destroyers, there is plenty of room. Even for the executor. Great video!
I never thought about this, and now I can't stop
Well you have to consider the death star wasn't ever really "operational" it was always basically in what the navy would call "shakedown cruise" if you had one that was in service for say a decade or more I'm sure having a ship yard and a multitude of features that was never dreamed of in film would come to be.
If you played Empire At War (The original, not FoC) You'd see it has a fleet of Star Destroyers in that game
I believe that in both games, it comes with population limit-free ISDs, and VCDs.
I always thought of something like this
A massive vessel that could carry star destroyers
Makes sense. Iserlohrn Fortress from Legend of Galactic Heroes is of similar size and power to DS, though not mobile. It’s essentially a full service naval base capable of servicing its organic defense fleet.
Though 20,000 ships under Yang Wen-li would crush the empire.
Still going.
Cylons vs UNSC.
Also just Halo content in general.
Yes
No star destroyers at Yavin is one of those Fridge Logic things you don't think of until well after you watched the movie.
It would have made sense for the Death Star to carry ISDs and deploy them to intercept rebel ships trying to escape Yavin... which, strangely, they didn't try to do.
In real life, the explanation likely is that nobody thought of it, and they wouldn't have had the FX budget anyway.
The best in-universe explanation that I can come up with is that the newly completed Death Star had yet to receive its full complement of ISDs, and the ones it did have were dispatched to Dantooine to deal with Princess Leia's fictional base.
Notification squad reporting in.
I always assumed it could carry ISD’s. It wouldn’t make sense if it couldn’t.
Yeah, same here. When the Millennium Falcon is tractored in during A New Hope it's clearly parked in one of the smaller hangars.
Yet they couldnt just launch an assault on Yavin...
@@Akeno0002 empire arrogance, they don't see the need so they didn't
Doesn't that contradict the rivalry between the advocators of a strong fleet
and the advocators of the Death Star?
Perhaps it was a compromise to try and please both sides.
No, it's not contradictory, because the resources put into building the DS battlestations still prevented the construction of many, many conventional ships.
So in your mind a rivalry means these various admirals and military leaders are going to disobey the emperor when he says “park your fucking ships in this battle station!” ?
Besides, we do see the fleet acting in support of Death Star 2. So if anything hard canon shits all over this supposed rivalry if you think it means ships and stations somehow can’t mix🤷♂️
I think you hit a key point about seeing PART of a star destroyer. My belief is that it was also used to house PARTS of a star destroyer so it was a portable maintenance station too.
It has at least one full drydock capable of full ship construction. It may also have what you mentioned, but I do think that was simply the rear view of a complete star destroyer. Examples of parts of star destroyers would be spare turbolasers and engines down to nuts and bolts, not an entire complete rear of a star destroyer. How often is there going to be a situation where you need to replace the entire rear of an ISD? Damage that catastrophic would blow the whole ship up.
Imagine if there was a whole fleet of SDs and support ships docked inside, and deployed during the fourth movie.
I don't think even Luke could've gotten through that...
#AskEck can u do Androids/Cyborgs compare?
Cylons
Cyberlife
Institute
Skynet
Cylons, Skynet, Tyrell Corp, and Weyland-Yutani would be cooler
Godzilla Boi don’t forget the good old geth
Hmmm maybe do them separately. Androids are self aware machines and cyborgs are people that are part machine. I read a paper in my collage biology classes that considered people with pace makers as cyborgs. My question is are droids androids?
1: If capital ships can make hyperspace jumps with fighters docked in their hangars, the Death Star should certainly be capable of the same even with Star Destroyers.
2: I don't feel that "indirect kills" should count for a pilot's total. Isn't taking down a Death Star enough of an achievement? :D
3: I could see the Death Star's massive hangars being able to repair and resupply capital ships, but building a whole vessel from scratch is probably outside the scope of the station. I'd actually be curious to know how self-sufficient the Death Star was intended to be. The amount of materials and components needed just to maintain the thing has to be absolutely staggering.
Eck, I was listening to the video while walking around my room and doing stuff, and I look out my room, I see a full moon, and my heart skipped a beat before I realized what I was truly looking at.
Love that SWTOR intro going in the background @2:42! Nice Ecks...👍
This is really cool, just awesome how these new things are discoverd even after 3 years!
Type-47A(H2) scarab vs type-47B(H3,reach,odst) scarab vs Banished scarab vs Volatile scarab
That’s so cool! I’d never even considered that it could carry ISD’s but it makes perfect sense!
don't forget the the Comic Book Visionaris, which gave us also the image of the Death Star Drydock, housing not only several ISDs, but also an Exekutor SSD.
And i always thought that the ISD in ANH would be docked, given that angle it approached the Death Star
It wouldn't surprise me if the Death Star could dock one or more Executor SSD's.
Back from liking some japanese stuff ( not the extremley popular ones like anime and manga) and man I forgot how joyful and calming your intro was, and how much I loved your vids.
I haven't seen your other channel but from the reference in this video I like the idea. It's more engaging. Kudos muchacho
#AskEck
*Attempt 496*
*Faction versus suggestion*
The Forerunners vs Warhammer 40k factions list.
Resistance is futile.
Honestly I haven't seen this one until now the but I salute those with persistence.
@@Dunarcarn same.
@@Dunarcarn
Why thank you good sir.
The destruction of the galaxy
Mandator vs. Subjugator
UNSC Infinity vs. Any ship of your choosing
#AskEck
I've never noticed that Star Destroyer docked with the Death Star in Rogue One, thanks for pointing that out! That's awesome!
I don't know if you made a video on it
#AskEck how did both the Jedi and Sith originate? How did they get their ideals and philosophies
That is a very interesting idea.
Huh, I never noticed that scene in Rogue One. That makes a lot of sense actually.
That’s...brilliant honestly. A space station with hangars for Star Destroyers and a super weapon!
A very long time ago, even before the Prequels, there was talk about the unfinished part of the Death Star 2 was hangers for the Imperial fleet. That's why it was fully operational and yet incomplete. But that was a nice catch from Rogue One.
It was a mobile shipyard and naval base. It could support a fleet of Star Destroyers allowing the Death Star to dominate a sector without showing its self
0:46 is that an Acclamator?
In The Force Unleashed videogame, the final stage takes place in the unfinished Death Star 1. As you walk from the entrance of one the hangars towards the inner sections, you can see plenty of star destroyers docked inside the station. They could be taking part in the construction process, or they could be actually stationed there.
I love your outro and above all the best videos
Was pretty strongly implied in A New Hope too, you see the ISD flying right towards it not angling off to make orbit or anything.
Honestly, it is actually explains why there was no fleet at Yavin. They were docked within the Death Star and Tarkin was too arrogant to deploy them
So the Death Star does have some use, at least.
Space battleship Yamato vs death star.
Wave Motion Gun would slice right through the Death Star like it wasn't even there....
In the expansion of Empire at War, The Second Death Star gave you a free Star Destroyer every time you entered battle
When I was a kid, you know every kid goes utterly insane with their creations? I used to imagine a death star so insanely big it would have a ring of super destroyers docked all around it
If you look at the headsets you see jedi wearing when piloting both kinds of Jedi starfighter they wrap around the forehead. I remember reading somewhere that this was supposed to be an experimental neural interface that jedi were able to make work because they were force sensitive while "normal" pilots usually weren't. This allowed for much quicker reactions and more complex maneuvers than manual fighter controls would otherwise permit.
Wow I just saw this today when I searched for "drydock star wars"
Great you made a video about it!
This explains why there were no ISDs at the assault on the first Death Star
when the death star goes into hyperspace all support ships including many star destroyers dock within the death stars shell therefore saving fuel and also allowing for huge assault on any target .repairs and arming can take place during transit and also allowing crews some rest and relaxation time with friends and family who lived and worked full time on the death star .
Thank you, EckhartsLadder.
Makes sense actually, "Battlesstation", not much of one if it's really just their verses version to an extremely odd an large shaped A-10 Warthog, an built around the main gun. A space station of THAT size should I'd imagine also be able to not only house huge ships like Star Destroyers but launch, fit, repair and perhaps even make them.. Thatd be disheartening to even a large Vong fleet.. moving in to attack the Death Star which only looks fairly unprotected and then suddenly parts open up an an Armada of large SDs sail out accompanied by swarms of TIEs and support ships of every type and size.. Thatd be pretty much EVERY other SW factions Worst nightmare case scenario. I believe Vong agents even hinted as much. An you had to know such scenarios kept Rebel Leadership awake at night for years
Having a built-in shipyard actually makes sense for a station of this size.
I remember the old book that said that the death star didn’t just have big star destroyer hangers, it’s actually a dry dock, yup they are manufacturing star destroyers in there as well
I always thought the sheer scale of the Death Star was a bit hard to swallow. A 120-km sphere would have an absolutely massive volume and mass, far more than would be required for housing a planet-killing weapon. Even cutting it down to 60km would still be utterly gargantuan, and I don't think even a mobile shipyard would be enough to justify that kind of size.
#AskEck This question ties in with the one from this episode.
If Eta-2 starfighters are only piloted by jedi and not clones, why does a standard Venator carry around 192 of them, when they could just use about 10 Eta-2 and fill the space with ARC-170 or V-wings?
That's so easy I'll do it... it takes about 191 destroyed ETA-2 for a Jedi commander to actually die. They are very good at surviving.
Interesting. And honestly all of this would make sense. The Death stars were such massive bases that like Eck says, giving them docking/repair bays big enough for Star Destroyers makes sense. Besides, it would probably end up saving money and it's not like this wasn't already a massive drain on the economy. Might as well make the totally indestructible planet killing bases carry the defense fleet. Heck, if the Tarkin doctrine worked then they could keep the smaller ships docked there almost permanently and save money there as well as no one would dare oppose the Empire.
The scene of the Death Star trench when Krennic departs, clearly does show a docked Imperial Star Destroyer. However, after reading all the technical companions and guides, it stated nothing larger than a Strike Cruiser was carried. Food for thought.
I honestly did notice this myself, but I had to rewatch it several times just to make sure I wasn't seeing things. I was wondering when one of my star wars channels was going to bring this up. Good eye sir!
Awesome find. Thanks for the video.
UNSC Infinty:I can hold 10 frigates!
Death Star:How my Imperial Star Destroyer.
Vs Machup
Spartan 2 vs Tyrannosaurus Rex
Bare Handed
I agree, it would have made sense to have a shipyard built into the death star, or at the very least, just hangers for a support fleet
That actually makes sense especially for the Tarkin Doctrine.
The empires lack of widespread implementation of dedicated flak frigates is one of their most glaring oversights. Compared to the cost of an Imp class adding a pair of raiders for CIWS duty would have paid in dividends far beyond the expenses of their operation.
Actually not clickbait, 10/10.
A space station of that size would probably require massive ships to ferry supplies and crew back and forth. You would probably want to carry around several large transport ships in case you have need of them for supplies, to transfer troops, to aid in a large scale evacuation from the Death Star or to the Death Star. It wouldn't be a large stretch to design into the Death Start the ability to provide hangars and docking for Star Destroyer sized ships.
Honestly for a station as big as the Death Star I think ISD sized docks would be necessary. Even if it didn’t have an escort fleet I think you’d need them just for the operation of the station. I mean think about how much stuff probably has to go in and out of the station every single day. Trying to move all those materials and assets exclusively with small transports would be a logistical nightmare. In addition to a defensive fleet around the station there probably is an enormous fleet of cargo carriers constantly coming and going around the clock. Even with all the hangars we see on the station I’d imagine that most ships would be under a lot of pressure to move their cargo as quickly as possible and undock for the next ship to come in.
Thinking about it now getting the station ready for hyperspace would be quite the involved and disruptive process. You’d have to communicate with hundreds of ships. Once a hyperspace route was chosen you’d have to clear out every ship from the station’s path. You’d have to reroute or reschedule who knows how many arrivals and departures. Just getting the station ready for hyperspace would probably take at least a few hours. And the fact that Darth Vader can dock his ISD whenever he wants for however long he wants is just another demonstration of how much authority he commands.
Very Large Hangers on the death star make sense. For a station that size, the amount of supplies required would be massive. So very large cargo ships would need somewhere to dock and offload bulk cargo efficiently and an umbilical or cargo transfer by tug would be slower than direct offloading.
I had never thought of it before reading lost stars, but when I did, I did make the correct assumption that they docked to an internal bay.
3:00 **Death star shows up** "Oh, its ok. We can handle this."
**Star destroyer shows up** "GUYS!! WE GOTTA RUN!"
If the rebellion was able to capture a Star destroyer they could fill it with some heavy/high explosive and possibly get an imperial traitor to get the ship into the Death Star and have it explode.
Yes, DS1 has shipyard capabilities but its not a dedicated shipyard, that job is left to orbital shipyard with the logistical infrastructure to supply it. Very likely the DS will do refits and resupply since its intended to be a mobile battle station and the capital ship docks hold its defense fleet ready to launch
If you search for "Death Star Drydock" there is an early artwork with docked Star Destroyers and even a Super Star Destroyer inside the Death Star . I was always fascinated of this Idea :-)
It’s so funny, I was just watching rogue one and that scene had brought me to this video... I didn’t notice the star destroyer but it brought the question to my mind
It's supposed to be a "station" so like Space Dock in Star Trek I see it making sense for refit/resupply/shore leave for Star ships. Something so big would make sense to be the hub of the large battle fleet that would be needed to escort it.
There is actually a level on the PSP version of the force unleash when you first board the DS and you can see ISDs docked with the station’s internal superstructure as you are advancing through the external walkways.
As for the station’s ability to carry a fleet inside, I think it’s actually very possible that the DS could at the very least carry and support an escort fleet if not a larger battle group given its sheer size. If so it elevates the strategic value and impact of the DS that’s stops been just a planet killer and also becomes a gigantic assault platform.
Eck, could you do some analyzing of Knightmare Frames?
United Mass Effect galaxy + the Reapers vs a Yuzhan vong invasion (Star Wars).
One sharp eye you got there Eck! 👁️👍
From the very first Star Wars, I always thought that The Death Star would act as a fully functioning replacement for planetary assets. It would have dry docks and everything for the repair of ISDs, even potential to build one from scartch. Rec spaces for crews, etc.
Makes perfect sense! It is a moon-sized space station/super weapon after all.
Thank you! I asked this of several sw youtubers a while back and no one had an answer.
This really shows how friggin big the Death Star is
Yeah, it does make sense. I thought there was an old concept art of showing this exact feature way before canon outright confirms it but it's been wayyyy long since I saw that...unless that was all in my head.
I imagine that a Death Star full of Star Destroyers was part of Plapatine's ultimate plan, but much like replacing every TIE Fighter with TIE Interceptors is something that was never fully realized as most of those Star Destroyers were always needed elsewhere so only a few were ever docked at a time. Still, if Palpatine had won at Endor, I imagine your idea of a Death Star full of Star Destroyers in every sector would be his endgame plan.
I wonder how Thrawn would feel about the project then.