YouTube, it's time for a change
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 вер 2024
- UA-cam continues to make the same mistakes over and over again, jeopardizing their creators in the process. It's unacceptable. It's time to sit down and actually figure things out UA-cam.
previous video: • The Cody Ko Situation ...
follow me on instagram!: / oohgust
follow me on twitter!: / oohgust
my gaming channel: / @ducktheaugust
subscribe: www.youtube.co...
outro song creds:
/ @prodgoostavo
/ @dadood3652
So let me get this straight: AugustTheDuck gets a strike for his recent reaction video but SSNIPERWOLF still has her account active like nothing happened? How's that freaking fair?
Because money
bc she has 30 million subs.
Simptuber Staff
she's the biggest female content creator. if they take her channel down they will be called sexist. no matter what sssniperwolf does. if they ban her, they will be called sexist.
It's a commentary video, but you get the idea
Yet they won't take down That Vegan Teacher's absolutely disgusting videos. Smh. The hypocrisy.
That, and they're still keeping SSSniperwolf on the platform
She literally posts animal gore and that's fine? Huh?
RIGHT?! smdh 🤦♀
Right?!? Fr UA-cam makes no sense 🤦🏽♀️
nothing makes sense in on this platform bro nothing
This is like the CoryxKenshin situation again. Where one UA-camr gets their video taken down while everyone else has the same kind. UA-cam sure loves its double standards, SMH 🤦♂️
Even if Cory returns to YT I bet YT will make up some BS after Cory’s return about a video from 10 years ago. YT is tripping. 😒
@@Zoomer_Boiyep. they'll find a random video to strike. i wonder if cory is conducting an experiment
Especially considering people like Markiplier had swearing in their ones while Cory's was perfect family friendly, it's bs
There was one react channel I use to watch and they had to stop because the copy right was going hard on them while others where getting nothing
wait what happened to Cory I am not familiar with this situation
This whole situation sucks. I’m surprised they haven’t given you a partner manager by now. That’s the easiest way to get these problems fixed.
4 mins ago??? 0 likes??? 0 reply's???? emme justtt--
but real
I does suck
I gotta fart
Sucks 😂😂
@@sharidongaskill1128 what's funny?
no it's really not.... the whole site as a whole is so broken and double standard that the ONLY way to get things fixed is to get enough HUGE youtubers talking about it.... that's literally it
I hate how if you appeal it, UA-cam can flip-flop, give you a strike, remove the strike, remove, unremove, age-restrict, and do all sorts of double, triple even quadruple takes on videos. But also, why has UA-cam been striking and even terminating channels for no reason. Over 5 of my favorite UA-camrs got terminated, one even got a million subscriber play button only to be terminated the next day. What the hell are they doing
It's because youtube wants to only back the corporate channels, and get rid of all the "average joe" channels even if the "average joe" channels get a million+ subs, and hundreds of thousands of views a day.
They also seems to gunning for YT channels that generally drama free, non controversy and family friendly channels. Many of them not even political
What they are doing is being absolute fucking assholes
@@hafirenggayuda And that's the biggest irony, since they don't want channels like Leafyishere since 2016...
I've been saying this for a little bit, youtube will snipe random youtubers for no reason but keep people like SSSniperwolf and The vegan teacher up
They could remove SssniperWolf for her downright illegal activity, That Vegan Teacher for talking a lot about cp/child SA, the UA-cam shorts that try to sell sex toys, predators, or abusive family channels, but no. They strike some dude stating his opinion about another dude. UA-cam, what the fuck.
Conclusion: AugustTheDuck is the least favourite "child".
SeptemberTheSwan is the middle child
OctobertheGoose is the youngest, he gets all the good stuff
@@RandomGuy13853 Is OctoberTheGoose SSSniperwolf?
Let’s not forget the thousands of sex bots flooding channels that are mainly viewed by children.
True. UA-cam is insane with their management and policies.
"Kids" channels with disgusting thumbnails will not get a single age restriction, but somehow this is.
Coryxkenshin also spoke on this. The age restriction is crazy with youtube, and so is the utter lack of communication and transparency.
It's like UA-cam finds the bad ones entertaining
Yeah. Holy crap those are horrifying.
it's just a symptom of a for profit public company.
There's no accountability.
Actually... there is... the accountability is to the sahreholders that the company has to make more money every quarter.
Well, UA-cam allows transparent clothing try-on videos.
yeah i can’t believe youtube is letting kids get exposed to those things its honestly such a shame
i feel like youtube genuinely does not care about their proper creators, and instead just keep the people who make the most money (e.g. sssniperwolf). its so ridiculous
@@x._.kodi_ In other words privilege
there is favoritism probably involved, which i am pretty sure is a violation, atleast to some degree
@@КГБКолДжорджКостанца if youre saying theyre violating their own TOS, who's going to be the one to stop them? they created the TOS, theoretically they can escape consequence from abusing it
not saying they arent wrong for their actions but in a system where they make the rules no one can really force them to play fair
@@kiromi790 but aren't they owned by Google? Wouldn't they have some way (hypothetically) to stop UA-cam is they're pulling some favoritism scheme in regards to the behavior of certain creators
UA-cam shouldn't have the power to just delete peoples income like that. I'm in Canada and don't know the exchange rate but hopefully this can make up for a small part of the revenue lost on that video.
@@jonathanheaton3554 I'm not sure about the conversion but anything helps. 😊
@@jonathanheaton3554 fight the power! 💪😂
@@MavARTTAugust is in the U.S (:
thats about 3.50 usd im also canadian so thats kinda cool to see someone dono i could never i dont have money
hell yah man. i was expecting the comments to be attacking august but nah were all for august it seems
This happened to my channel with a video I still scratch my head over.. flagged and demonetized for "nudity and sexual acts" when pretty much the only thing in it is me walking away from the camera in jean shorts (it was a roleplay and part of the scene is me leaving the viewer to use the restroom). It made me feel disgusted to be accused of something so incredibly false and after multiple appeal attempts nothing was done and I was told by a HUMAN (apparently) that the appeal stands firm. I re-uploaded the video with all previously flagged timestamps edited and removed and it again - within MINUTES, was flagged and demonetized. I know for a fact that nothing about it broke community guidelines and certainly not the ones listed on the flag. It's frustrating and I hope with enough attention something really does change! Let us creators know if there is anything we can do to help.
Try not to screw over small creators challenge impossible UA-cam edition.
Also, finding Cherie in the AugustTheDuck comment section definitely was not on my 2024 bingo card.
Your videos are obviously sexually
charged
I hate how the original video just never has anything happen to it
It is really irritating.
surely original & others should be removed because "unsafe content also" as original is worse then what august did in terms of "unsafe content" if so
No, it was age restricted. Wow such a big deal
@@ravenspurplebeats5412 Exactly
@@raphaelchan7574 He literally said it got struck, pay attention
UA-cam when normal content: 😡
UA-cam when content farm channels make content of children show/trending characters in sexual poses and situations: 😌
{{Edit: papa I'm famous now plz come back with the milk it's been 18 years}}
No comment.
UA-cam: I sleep now
Exactly like bro there are animations of cartoon characters doing sexual stuff and youtube doesn't care, but the second somebody says a swear word on a video they get demonetized like what are you doing youtube
UA-cam when normal comment: 🤬
UA-cam when bot spam: 😪
FOR REAL THOUGH OMG X.X
I had a channel removed for child endangerment. Permanently gone with no chance for appeal.
I had never posted a single thing on that account in my life.
But its gone. For no reason.
Oh god now I’m scared 😱
Reminds me of people blocking me from groups because they assume I’m a fake account due to my name. Once that happens there’s no repercussions. Makes me feel icky and embarrassed like Junior High School. Oh my gosh. That’s exactly what it’s like. Middle School. Yuck.
I’d lose my mind I have been cultivating my liked videos and music playlist for nearly 20 years at this point. I still refuse to listen to music anywhere else. 😂
Just curious what was that channel called?
@@filledwithvariousknowledge2747 dont remember, but i know it was completely harmless
Fun fact:
I used to be an animator who would do videos to popular songs. Like a bunch of other artists did.
Their videos were and are still up, but all mine were claimed and removed.
I did the whole crediting, stating this is simplya parody of that music, the lot.
Nope.
Tried to contact YT with a very similar comment you made.
Striked, and my chanel taken down.
Since I wasn't popular, and they knew it, as you said, I couldn't do anything about it.
YT *absolutely* has favorites.
I feel bad for you
It's the fact that a UA-camr has to go onto ANOTHER social media platform to demand something happen. That's beyond backwards.
I hate the way UA-cam treats their creators, and it’s not even new they just refuse to change.
@@AugustTheMexicanDucksadly I think it wil never come back
Yep. UA-cam has had a lot of favoritism. And I'm not kidding when I say it and they try and cover it up sometimes too. It's just sad.
@@gerarditogm2181 😭
@@ethanxillasaurus2572 dont try to make it about yourself.
Its not just conent creators, but also their commenters. Comments are being deleted in massive droves, just for using words UA-cam deems as problematic. If a content creator makes a video about Hatler and people in the comment section are discussing history, UA-cam automatically deletes people using the word, and sometimes even the video itself.
There's a couple channels that advertise sex toys as UA-cam Shorts. A lot of these sex toys look like stuffed animals, only a couple of the vids are age restricted...
I know it's crazy
Also with stuff like one specific huge furry UA-camr literally doing that same thing (although not disguised at all) that is still up from what i believe
That’s really concerning! It’s alarming that such content isn’t properly age-restricted. UA-cam needs to do a better job of enforcing their guidelines to protect viewers, especially younger ones
WHAAT(link pls)
There are a bunch of people I watch who've gotten sponsored by those companies. I always skip it but it always feels so gross that companies can advertise it on UA-cam and it's perfectly fine. I get why the creators might accept the sponsorship, but UA-cam shouldn't allow it if they have a problem with videos like August's.
Literally predators keep their channels and probably never get striked. But normal commentary gets striked,flagged, and/or taken down. Ridiculous.
Yeah I don't understand why UA-cam picks on actually good honest people and protects evil.
It shows how laughably bad and unfair this platform's moderation is.
Yup. We all know which side YT is on! We know what their employees are into as well.
It just lets us know what the kind of people running Google are.
There’s literal pornography on this we sure and nobody bats an eye! It is on *kids* UA-cam!
If us; the viewers could manage to boycott YT for a month, they would take notice. But viewers won’t do that, they just find the next video in their queue that isn’t deleted. I know August said it isn’t our responsibility, and he’s right, but if something is going to change, it may come down to ALL of us making painful sacrifices. YT have effectively scared me away from even starting a channel because of this BS. And it started with the realization that YT has no REAL people looking at content for anything; they set their little AI bots to do what they do, which is absolutely a joke. An automated computer interface can’t possibly facilitate something as massive as what they are trying to do. Grrrrrrr it’s frustrating 😡
UA-cam: *sees a big creator commit an actual crime* 🙂
Also UA-cam: *sees smaller content creator vaguely mention something copyrighted/explicit* 😡 “your channel is being taken down”
UA-cam: “I did a good thing” 😌
The rules seem to only apply to smaller creators.
Its a shame, having no real competitor allows unfairness like this to have little to no consequences
One of the factors of this that I think gets overlooked is that UA-cam has virtually no competition. There's not a single social media out there that is like UA-cam. No other website has this amount of video sharing as UA-cam. The only true "competitors" are Twitch and Tik Tok, and they follow a very different formula from UA-cam.
Without competition, UA-cam doesn't feel motivated to make things right, or improve their website because they are the competition. They don't have to respect their creators to be successful because no one is close to them in competition. It's the same about EA and their inability to improve their Madden games because 2K isn't giving them challenge anymore.
It's disgusting, competition or not, for companies to do this to the people who make their money. I wish UA-cam would stop with the double standards of keeping predator channels like James Charles and SSSniperWolf on UA-cam while striking people who only talk about topics without condoning them.
As a content creator myself, I will totally continue to advocate for the UA-cam community because they deserve much better than this.
You bring up a crucial point about the lack of competition. Without any real rivals, UA-cam doesn’t feel the pressure to improve or treat its creators fairly. It’s frustrating to see them prioritize profits over the community that makes their platform successful. The double standards are indeed disgusting. As a fellow content creator, your advocacy for the UA-cam community is so important. We all deserve better!
True, but one day something better is going to come along and UA-cam is going to either have to fix itself or get lost to history.
Yup. They're the Comcast of video sites.
Yep, they basically have a monopoly on digital video sharing. Technically, yes you can try and compete with them but let's be real youtube has Alphabet Inc (Googles parent company) backing them with basically infinite money so smaller competitors ain't seriously competing with them. They don't change the rules because they don't have to.
Sadly, you're correct
It is ridiculous, same thing has happened to me got two false wrong guidelines strikes within 2 hours, and got demonetized
That’s incredibly frustrating! Getting two false strikes in such a short time and then being demonetized is just unfair. UA-cam really needs to improve their system to prevent this from happening. Hang in there 😔💪
Why you lyin
@@danieleli5753 tf im not
@@TurkeyTwisted Thanks Man
Yo, how do you only have 4 vids but over 400k subs? Do you gain 100k per video?
The way that YT has a content creator address a strike, or any issue, is like the scams you hear about that takes your money yet no representatives/personnel employed. Your just screwed. And that is basically, end of story.
Btw, your voice is so great!!
No Customer Service, No Accountability. This Should be Illegal.
3.7 million videos (271,000 hours) are uploaded to UA-cam per day. Customer Service would be nearly impossible. They should make some sort of system at least a little better than no option though.
Customer service is for customers ( that is, the ones buying advertising).
This literally makes no sense. This is like if someone commits a crime and then another persons reports it to the police and the police arrest the person who reported the crime.
Yeah, I know right? The hypocrisy here on UA-cam is out of this world.
and the cops blame you for telling them, saying it was your plan to rob it all along
When August Shows His Face, You Know It's Serious.
oui
The pink sauce video?
@@What_Is_Blud_On_Aboutsome would say that's more serious than this one
Absolutely! When August steps in, you know things are about to get real. 🌟
'Guyss'.... he reminds me of my Dad when I used to get into trouble
Please Dont Get Terminated. I Love This Channel
He won't, this will probably be appealed quickly. Just one of the unfortunate things you have to deal with as a popular UA-camr
I spent over 6 hours on hold and three days in emails but I finally got 2 false strikes and warning reversed. It's bull crap but I got it done.
One way to perhaps cut down on false copyright strikes: if you appeal the strike decision & say that you’re going to take the channel that struck the video to court to defend your fair-use stance, the striking channel either must go to court to defend their claim that copyright has, indeed, been legitimately broken, or THEIR channel gets terminated for issuing a false strike.
I've actually gotten a community guideline strike before. Here's the thing, though, my channel only has about 80 subscribers, I don't make money off of it, and it's mostly just videos of my cats. I have some AI stuff on there too, but the video that got flagged was literally just a video of one of my cats blinking. Like, what the hell?
You can appeal. I know August's failed, but yours sounds like someone spiteful reported you for nothing. Also strikes expire after 90 days. Unless you get another within 90 days. 😳
Cat: *blinks*
UA-cam: 😱😱⚠️⚠️🔞🔞🤬🤬😨😨🫢🫢
When the pandemic started, I had a cam pointing at my cats bed and would stream it on UA-cam for my coworkers to check out my cats. After 3/3 streams ended due to copywritten materials, I gave up. No music or talking. Just my cats sleeping got me in trouble multiple times.
In the future, people are probably gonna get flagged just for blinking like the cats
That's a nice watch.
UA-cam needs to stop automating these tasks and take a good look at what’s actually being uploaded
But that would require effort, and paying a fair wage to real humans! And they can't have that.
@@WobblesandBean Yeah, morals are for losers.
They certainly make enough money to hire actual humans to do it
Y'all thousands of videos are posted on UA-cam every day it would be near impossible for this to happen unfortunately.
Human mods are probably in India with zero context for American vids, let's be real. Same for Meta.
This is a great example of how bad the UA-cam moderation is.
@@AugustTheMexicanDuck its just a duck its not that serious
This moderation might be just as bad as Roblox's moderation
This perfectly highlights just how flawed UA-cam's moderation system is. It's really disappointing.
how long in 10-20 years will UA-cam continue to run...there should be another site, a competitor, not centralized but better modified
the moderation probably doesn’t even exist
They can get rid of the 3 strike system but they would then need something to replace it.
You can’t have 100+ SSsniperwolfs on your platform or Neons, or Jacks. I’m not talking about Courage or Jacks films, or Jack Septiceye. We’ve seen time and time again what happens when you give problematic creators a slap on the wrist with no real consequences.
I just realized he's recording outside..
Also, I definitely agree. I tried uploading some of my own music and multiple videos we're taken because they were "stolen from the copyright holders"
UA-cam has shown constantly that they no longer care for the creators that have made it what it is today. They've made it clear that the You in UA-cam no longer matters.
They should rename it to MeTube
@@MeemahSN WebelongtogooglesogiveusmoneyandwewilldonothingtobenefityouinreturnTube
Itube
Tube 😔😔😔
have they ever care in the first place?
this is true. UA-cam treats their creators who dont have over 10M subscribers like actual shit. They dont even try to change. FTP 🤦♀
Fuck the police ?
@@kriswell. ICE CUBE
even the ones with over 10 mill, like coryxkenshin. They are so fucking fake honestly (the yt mods and staff)
@@kriswell. f* this platform- LOL
@@arospec2712 exactly like wtf
The problem is the hypocrites in charge. They are okay with the most screwed up content being exposed to everyone, even kids, but don't ever criticize it or them.
Why do NONE of these big UA-camrs ever mention anything about whats been happening for like half a year now, where half of the comments that people post on UA-cam are being auto-deleted
Why do NONE of these big UA-camrs ever mention anything about whats been happening for like half a year now, where half of the comments that people post on UA-cam are being auto-deleted?
MAGAs control YT, so it's not surprising.
This stuff pisses me off. I got my first strike on my YT channel for an SFX makeup transition that the bots thought was "child abuse"? It gave me a freaking heart attack, and my appeal was instantly denied too. YT needs to get humans on there. That said, I sincerely hope you don't lose your channel August, since you're one of my favorite commentary UA-camrs. Good luck.
Sorry this happened to ya. You’re one of the good ones. Freedom of speech is practically dead thanks to the offended-by-everything community
bro you need more likes wow
I was actually considering becoming a youtuber, but ever since I saw changes youtube was implementing I decided it's not worth it.
I would wait till Trump gets in office (It has no relevancy lol)
What does Trump being president have to do with it?@@doyouknoedawae
@@doyouknoedawae Trump was unbanned from Twitch so he is going to be at Twitchcon in 2024.
Same af. They can't even get a short from me, because wtf. There's only so much self censorship I'm gonna do at any given time for any reason. There's no community or safety in this mess they're doing.
@@fluffybaroqueomnimedia4485 I was gonna do only videos without shorts. I hope you manage to do what you want to in your life.
It's absurd how predators can keep their channels without any strikes, while regular commentary channels get flagged, striked, or taken down. Absolutely ridiculous.
This is the main reason why I ultimately decided against the idea of starting a UA-cam channel.
I don't want to deal with the constant double standards, incorrect application of policies, and lack of communication.
At this point I'm convinced that UA-cam only gives large creators a pass on their own policies, which is absolutely disgusting. Keep in mind that these are the same people who are willing to jeopardize the safety of Jacksfilms and his family just to keep SSStalkerwolf on the platform because till this day, they still refuse to permanently ban her for doxxing him.
Everyone: "UA-cam, it's time for a change."
UA-cam: "Yep, more censorship, larger thumbnails, and more exploitation of small creators in the interest of corporate greed. We're on it!"
it'd be great if a big youtuber also brought this up on twitter or something, it would force youtube to listen.
The minimum level of "big" would have to be someone like Charlie, and hes even made videos about this topic many times.
Markiplier and Jack have done videos about this same topic. UA-cam doesn’t give a shit
UA-cam needs like overhaul of their whole moderation team
Well except mrbeast doesn't really give a damn so ..
Ann Reardon, from How To Cook That, one of the biggest cooking UA-camrs, tried to say something after one of her debunking videos got taken down.
They don't listen. They don't care.
This happened to me 6 times already, for videos that dozens of other creators have. Is so annoying as a content creator to see that you are singled out from literally a bunch.
I will not stand this AugustTheDuck slander
Man I'm so sorry for the struggle! That really sounds awfully stressful 😢
I absolutely enjoy your content and hope to see your videos for a long long time going ❤
I personally think that they should make age restriction like the copyright strike thing. UA-cam has an implemented editor in youtube studio that allows you to cut stuff you don't want out. Why have an emplemented editor if you don't even get told what youtube doesnt like in a video and have the option to cut it out? If a creator breaks the rules, then yes they do have to take responsibility for it and accept that they broke the rules. But for those who actually care about following the rules, if a video gets age restricted and we don't know what it is that got our video age restricted then how are we supposed to cut out or fix our age restricted video if they don't tell us what's wrong with the video? It's the same with anyone in the comments saying "Your video is offensive" or "I don't like the video", and I get it like you can't please everyone, but it's the same thing. TELL US WHAT YOU WANT FIXED OR CUT OUT! Because creators aren't mind readers, they just blur out any crap they think would be age restricted and then hope for the best. I just think that if we do our best to cut out anything the is disturbing and we think it's good we should get told what it is about the video that got age restricted so we can cut it out. That's just me. I also think that this whole thing has made creators quit and not wanna do youtube anymore due to how stressful it is and how much lack of communication there is. I can't even make a video without overthinking "Do I need to cut this out, is this okay to leave in, will this get age restricted?" It's killed the creativity of creators and they wonder why most of their popular youtubers are leaving and quitting their platform. Obviously there are other reasons like personal issues, but I feel like it also has to do with the unfair treatment and communication issues. You look at other youtubers and they post a video on a game and so you think "oh, well I've been wanting to record my reaction to this game and since other youtubers have posted it it should be fine to post right?" and then you post the video with some edits blurring out some stuff, and your video still gets age restricted and the other youtubers are fine. Like How is that fair? And especially for creators who are just starting what are they supposed to do once they get a age restriction? They're pretty much screwed as far as I know because youtube doesn't tell you crap.
UA-cam is so inconsistent in like almost everything not even just content, all the way to things like comments n shi. Why are my comments getting deleted and my acc being on the vurge of being deleted for saying like a cuss word MAX but there’s ppl saying way WORSE and their comments are still floating around on YT. It’s gotten to the point I literally have to censor what I type or not type at all. UA-cam is so weird they need to do a better job
I swear, it feels like UA-cam has a personal vendetta against August
Every platform on social media are on a mission to fall the fastest and hardest
Reposting since they took down my comment. Censorship is wrong and its okay for THEM to take down content that is well within their guidelines, but they can put up the most disgusting ads that go against their OWN guidelines. I miss when UA-cam was actually about the USERS.
UA-cam is a joke.
@@Rizaru42 It stopped being about the users from 2015 onwards, every UA-cam OG can tell you that the golden days lasted from 2005-2014
They treat they're advisors better than the creators
This just goes to show how big tech companies don’t care in what goes on their platform. SMH.
I hear you. I have a couple of channels, and one of them is dedicated to my AI political parodies and music. I had written lyrics to a song called "My Uncle's Gone MAGA" with a series of lyrics about a guy complaining about his uncle posting right-wing memes to Facebook. At one point in the song the narrator talks about how his uncle is anti-science and now believes vaccines cause autism. SECONDS after posting this song, I get a community guidelines strike. To which I was incredibly baffled, because I had no idea as to why based on my lyrics -- this was political satire, after all. I appealed it, and that got denied (of course). I had to take some sort of quiz to have the strike changed to a warning (and the quiz was all about how if you post content that is anti-vaccine it's a bad thing, so that's how I figured out that was the reason my song got the strike). But if a person had actually paid attention to the song (and there's even lyrics to read along with!) it would have been obvious that this was not an anti-vaccine song, but actually the opposite. So I feel for you, Mr. Duck.
Well I’m glad I got to watch the video before UA-cam removed it. That’s BS, August.
youtube has the resources to deal with something like this, it's time for youtube to finally do something about their system and not just twiddle their thumbs anymore.
I hate how UA-cam treats channels as just a way to share videos when in reality, some people make a living off of UA-cam (including yourself)! Just three strikes and your forced to do a regular 9 to 5 job.
Hey AugustTheDuck, I hope you see this comment and it helps you in some way. I felt bad seeing you so upset. Im not a UA-camr, so I don’t know a whole lot about their policies for Creators. However, I am in the Tech industry….You are absolutely right, UA-cam personnel don’t have the time to go through every single video uploaded on the site. So they create algorithms to help them automate the process and “bots” handle majority of the work. And “bots” handle majority of the complaints. So what you need to do is simply modify your future videos to make them “invisible” to the bots. Make sure title and description doesn’t have 18yo+ terminology and if it does, learn what AND how many terms and phrases can pass as “invisible” to the bots. Compare the content of your video to the same video created by Critical and see if there are key differences. For anyone who read this comment, please like it to get it to the top so August can see it. Maybe it can help and maybe not. Just wanted to see if I could be of use. 😊
It is entirely possible for them to put clips in their algorithm to be searched for all videos, once they have established a certain clip goes against their terms of service. They just choose not to.
I had another channel I did animations on. All animations made by me and trademark and copyrighted under ComputerChick Productions. My animation channel was false struck by someone that was TERMINATED over 20x on youtube false strikes. I sent UA-cam my trademark and all my information and still can't get my animation channel back. The Animations are still on rumble and odysee no issues.
That’s incredibly frustrating and unfair! It’s disheartening to see your hard work and creativity being undermined by false strikes, especially when you’ve provided all the necessary information to UA-cam. It’s great that your animations are still available on Rumble and Odysee, but you deserve to have your channel restored on UA-cam as well. Keep fighting for your rights
@@TurkeyTwisted bend fighting for 2-3 years
And thats not even getting into the ghost deleting comments nonsense. Its out of control. YT is a garbage platform
fr 😂😂
wait that doesn't just happen to me? thank god. my comments will get deleted randomly and i won't even say anything offensive. it's insanity. i thought maybe my internet (that works perfectly fine) could have been the reason. youtube just sucks i guess
But when micropenismaniacUTTP says that he plays with dead animals it's absolutely okay
@@magmamaze69 Nope, its happening to everyone. Especially when it comes to politics. Id say somewhere between 80-90% of my comments regarding politics get deleted no matter how G rated and factual they are. Free speech on YT is nonexistent
@@tehlaziness that's so stupid. youtube needs to fix their platform. it happens to me whenever i respond even somewhat negatively. which mind you i only respond negatively if the other person insults me or if the comment is so bad that it warrants it. and even then i keep it rather tame. and when it gets deleted i will edit it to not include anything "offensive" and it still doesn't register it. again the person commenting can say the most rude and offensive shit but whenever i say something as simple as "you're acting childish" my comment is shadow banned. it's so stupid.
Ah makes sense how UA-cam copyright strikes the people who make people aware about these things because of the guideline breaking things in the video, but not the video with these rule breaking aspects of which making commentary on. (Sorry if my sentence structure is weird I have a concussion)
WHAT??? Are you ok?????
@@thesupercooldude9801 I hope its a figure of speech cause your not suppose to be online with a concussion but getting medical attention
@@thesupercooldude9801 kinda, the headaches have subsided for now, thanks for asking!
@@Paldeo_Hawthorn My eyes see the sentence, but my brain is having a stroke, like a wall was built for that information
Get better soon man 🫂
UA-cam's inconsistency and lack of support for creators is beyond frustrating. It's about time they start listening to the community that is essentially running their platform.
UA-cam has become a shell of its former self. I can’t believe how many creators left the platform or got banned for ridiculous reasons. For example, CoryxKenshin and Stevewilldoit.
2:56 invisible duck
I’ve been searching for someone who noticed, I though I was seeing things
Everyone noticed that was the whole joke there man
@@CaptainHieronymusLex was it a joke? I was thinking of that, but he only disappeared for like a second.
@@Captain_Rex-7567 I thought so because he said before that that he needs to change idk maybe it was just funny to me 🤣
@@CaptainHieronymusLex I found it funny, just took me a second to realize that was a joke
I have a channel where I share archived news stories, I add a little context etc. the news channels I take from are major broadcasters that allow their reports to be shared, they just show as ‘copyright/no action’.
Now, most of those reports get locked down as adult content, whilst the news broadcasters aren’t. I’ve tried debating it, but UA-cam won’t budge.
So the exact same footage and report with a little context about the dates and history after the report get locked down.
I choose to mark a percentage as adult, as I don’t want youths seeing it… but the majority are TV broadcast news reports.
It’s crap.
[I’m currently on my personal account]
Happened to my other channel years ago, had some videos up for 10 years. One day 3 got a strike from the same person, account deleted, can't access youtube, can't watch videos, can't do anything. Everything gone instantly.
All the "that happened to me too guys " are so obnoxious. Guess what: it doesn't make you more interesting , even more why undermine your credibility. As long as I don't see your channel pressing on profile pic it's just lame...
If you can’t access UA-cam, how are you commenting this
A few years ago I got an age restriction on a FNaF 4 jumpscare sound video, and UA-cam rejected my apeal! Yeah they do not to get real people on this.
No way
I have been reported 3 times by someone in the last couple weeks for "violating community standards" with my comments. "harassment and bullying".
I think it was because some kid didnt like me talking down to him, but who even knows. Sensitive society sucks.
That happened with me, but I was talking to a bot
@@TVTIME-be8ze Its strange, but I have been called a bot.
I never know which comment is the one that banned me for a day....but this last one, I got a reply to a comment that I left and when I went back to see what I said, my comment wasnt visible. I think that is the one that someone took offense to, but I never know.
It might have been key words. I tried saying "pew pew" instead of firearm or the "g" word.....they dont seem to like that. You can cuss, but you cant seem to reference to past dictatorship of Germany without problems either. Like calling someone part of the regime.
How did you know it was a bot?
@@tommywolfe2706 because the bots usually have a kinky profile picture of a lady with big buns and cans
I feel like the people at UA-cam need some kind of rude awakening, or just have a way to experience what content creators experience, then maybe they would gain some kind of empathy or understanding towards them.
The ONLY fix will be a website that does the same thing as youtube, but is better to creators and pays proper attention to these types of issues or simply doesn't have these problems.
This exact formula is also utilized in the video game industry, and something NEEDS to change.
The amount of people who get suspended/banned in video games simply because they said a bad word is astounding. And I genuinely do mean a simple bad word. Not even like something racist or anything. Just saying "you're garbage" is enough to warrant a "hate speech" or "harassment" suspension.
Meanwhile the same game you get suspended from for saying a bad word is riddled with cheaters/hackers. BLATANT cheaters/hackers. Not like "yeah this guy MIGHT be cheating. They're playing a little sus, but I'm not sure". It's straight up aimbot, wallhacks, damage multipler, invincibility, etc. And these cheaters are constantly getting away with it. The only time anything is ever done about these issues is if a mega content creator @'s the devs on Twitter.
I'll use Apex as an example because Apex is in the hot seat rn. I've been banned multiple times from the game for saying bad words and I've sent in appeal after appeal stating exactly what you did to UA-cam: "hey, like, you either need to ban literally half the player base for breaking TOS or reinstate my account because this is unfair". And my appeals go nowhere, my accounts are suspended, and nothing gets done about all the other TOS breakers. All I get is an automated bot email response saying they reviewed my report and the suspension still stands. Using the in-game report system doesn't do anything either, so reporting the other players won't get them banned. And the only way to reinstate an account or get a cheater banned is if a mega content creator gets on Twitter and hounds Hideouts (the ONLY person that's in charge of handing out bans..... one person..... in all of Apex......). I've literally once reported someone who told me to kms, and less than 20 minutes later I got an email saying they reviewed my report and no action was taken. Meanwhile in a different game I told this smoker who couldn't stop hacking into his OPEN mic that if he was gonna choke and die then he needs to do it with his mic off. And I got banned for "violent speech". Aka they sae the word die and immediately thought I was inciting violence. They literally blacklisted the word die in a video game about shooting and killing people. That's some 1,000 IQ shit right there.
Either these corporations need to hire ACTUAL people to review things, or don't even bother trying to suspend people. Because nothing is ever fair and unless you're popular you're completely screwed.
Whoa. Brutal and suave
I honestly feel so bad for you August. And so many other content creators out there who have similar or smaller audiences and influences than you. I agree 100%. UA-cam definitely needs to go through their entire system and revamp it. Especially their Community Guidelines. And I wish they will at least be a few real humans actually going through each appeal or copyright claim to lessen the amount of false actions we’ve had this year. It is so sad how UA-cam’s old systems right now are making small creator’s jobs more miserable and overwhelming rather than fun and free. I hope this will get fixed soon August! You have my support! 😊
It's frustrating to see the original video and other reaction videos still circulating. I hope everything resolves in your favor!!
Google the company that makes Android phones and Gmail but has ZERO customer service/claim tickets for UA-cam. it's unbelievable
off topic but your face matches the duck so well, you look like a human duck in the best way possible
Irl August looks like a burnt out father😔
Yes!!
And then kids channels can have straight corn. Makes so much sense...
I know specially the furry community. I hate to be a generalizer here, but you can’t search for memes which are supposed to be jokes without it being cropped porn and the fact that most kids watch this unrestricted is ridiculous.
@@jaredjoe133 YES! And then the elsagate content back in 2016, or smth that they only did smth about, because it'd make them look bad
@@B_is_dumb elsagate never left.
@@B_is_dumb traumatized me and many others
As some one trying to make a UA-cam channel. This is vary VARY annoying. And pisses me off. Some of my videos would be copywright claimed by playing free domain music. (That live stream is deleted now) And even some of my comments on other videos that are completely fine would be deleted. Without any warning saying that i sould edit my comment. Bruh
You’re not a duck??? WTF Man?? Sorry bout the strike but… I’m sorry, my mind is blown.
No, no. He is a duck. Yk those youtubers who use like these anime characters like tracking there movement?(they're especially used by streamers.) Well this is just like that, but only so da government doesn't find him and experiment, considering he's a talking duck and all.
You know it’s serious when he takes the duck head off
@@PinnaclePineapple you've gone mad, dude
@@shelby5809 maybe i have lol
@@shelby5809it’s a joke
@0:49 - If it wasn't for double standards, UA-cam wouldn't have any standards at all. You win a sub.
Yeah, I just got a strike for no apparent reason, because of a joke I made lmao
And have no idea how to remove it
AGREE!!!! They need to fix the OLD out of date system. The Late Night Crew (LNC) just went through this and went to San Jose CA to sue UA-cam for taking the LNC page down. He vlogged the whole trip. Time to listen up UA-cam!
Idk why UA-cam does this. Wouldn’t it be more productive if they just asked content creators to take it down. And maybe NOT strike down a channel?
Yt: say a bad word in your video: Strike video
Also Yt: transparent clothes try-on: 👍
whoa okay this is a new background im not used to this
So real
@@AugustTheMexicanDuck can you not make these comments on serious videos? I understand doing it on the other vids he makes, but this isn't the best thing to do on serious videos. You might be seen as a crappy person
@@Coy_The_Odd_One got it
@@AugustTheMexicanDuck 👍
@@Coy_The_Odd_One This is not even that serious. Just AugustTheDuck giving his opinion. It's not serious. His channel is not at risk. He has 1.8 mil subscribers. He. Will. Be. Fine.
This is why I worry UA-cam will go out of business.
To be honest I'm shocked its still around I've been on it since 2005.
They have an absolute claw grip on non live-stream video hosting and are owned by Google... they're a mess and they're doing terribly, but monopoly.... 😞
Really, it's because UA-cam and, by extension, Google are biting the hands that are feeding them. As August mentions in this video, he and other content creators are quite literally Google's main source of income and they're also making UA-cam billions upon billions of dollars each year. Without this source of income, Google just wouldn't exist today.
He should make a backup channel just in case of a ban on his current account and link it to his descriptions on all of his videos after he makes it on his newer videos
Search duck the August or the ballistic bird
He has a gaming channel named "ducktheaugust" and also as the person above me said, ballistic bird is another account
@@PouchyTheCanadianAlpaca sorry did no know
I personally think that these content creators need to start lawyering up and threatening the platform with legal action for false strikes. When they start getting in trouble and start being forced to pay out compensation they will soon stop as you're hitting them where it hurts the most in their wallets and reputation.
The same thing happened to Kubz Scouts his video got a copyright strike for reacting to a video while many other people reacted to the same video with no problems:(
UA-cam picks and chooses what creators they want to go after
Ugh... UA-cam is just treating them like garbage... No seriously, UA-cam is just dumb now...
I read this as , UA-cam, it’s time for a challenge 😭😭💀💀
Sorry you're dealing with this. I never had a community strike, but back before they changed monetization rules and tiny channels like mine could earn some pocket change from our videos, I got a copyright strike and had my channel demonetized. What was the copyright strike against? The birdsong in the background of a vlog I made... in my back yard. Literal birds singing in the background and some bot claimed a copyright on it. It took me 6 months to fight that. So, yeah these shenanigans from UA-cam are definitely nothing new. I'm almost glad they changed UA-cam monetization rules and forced me into a different creative direction. Now I don't have to put up with all that, and I'm a published author (so, yay!).
I honestly don't know how to respond to this. UA-cam NEEDS to work on their poor moderation, many content farm channels have made tons of inappropriate content NOT MADE FOR CHILDREN and yet they are still "made for kids" but some stupid video made by a normal guy stating his opinion on UA-cam is considered "strange and inappropriate" this is so messed up and the moderation difficulties are definitely to blame.
Two weeks ago today, an animator on UA-cam by MayhemTown with around 30K subs had his channel wrongfully terminated without warning, because of a censored sexual joke video he made. I didn't see the video as I was asleep at the time. He had posted it to Newgrounds the same day too and either he removed it or it got taken down on there too
UA-cam Guidelines are so stupid. I can’t believe they let kids content have sexual content in it and then UA-camrs who do nothing wrong get a strike. So dumb.
All that will happen is that a few other UA-camrs will make a video about this and UA-cam will reinstate the video. The problem will still remain
Again, it’s pretty crazy how there’s channels of naked people with ads on. When they know there are kids watching UA-cam. Yet if there’s a single curse word or when someone is trying to bring a light on a certain subject, UA-cam is quick to stomp out..
As someone who wants to become a full time UA-camr, this should definitely change.
Side-note: I hate websites/companies that use auto naughty words detection for usernames. (Tit)anium Bucket
If everyone switches to Rumble, UA-cam will have to change
it's already getting a good chunk of people