Biden has been on national television, all networks, three times since the shooting, the first time just about two hours after it happened, and again at 1pm and 8pm Sunday, and with this prominently figured. If you've missed this, I guess it's one further datapoint about media coverage in this election.
The wife of the fire chief that died said that she heard nothing from Donald Trump. Joe Biden was talking to her by phone and gave a little comfort at an awful time for her family.
This video has really missed the mark & misjudged the mood in America right now. On what planet is this a springboard for Biden to revive his campaign? Bias shines through this video, disappointing because it’s not like New Statesmen
@@ilof8125 Then that's the conclusion they came to - they looked at the possibilities and decided they probably wouldn't happen or if they did they wouldn't work. That's how discussion works - you look at the situation, you weigh it up and come to a conclusion. We don't get enough of that as far as I can see.
Why the Bolsonaro moment ain't mentioned more recurrently? It was similar event on a similarly incindiarry politician to see how politics has dealt with an event like this
I think it's because the guy that took the photo is probably charging exorbitant prices. So people can't afford it or he already sold the rights to a news outlet.
@@global_nomad.yeah, it’s stupid. The Americans can call them what they want, but generally we don’t refer to ex presidents as president in the uk. So, yeah, they should stop
Ex-Brit, now American here. These guests are living in some parallel universe if they think Biden can turn this thing around. I've talked to some undecideds here over the weekend and to a man and woman they're voting for Trump in Nov. As I will be...
@@xunqianbaidu6917 You don't have to. Over at The Hill they were discussing this this morning and they said word from Dem sources is the Dems are now resigned to Trump being reelected as our 47th. Polling on Friday had Trump leading in all the swing states and taking Nevada. There's now multiple paths to 270 Electoral College votes for Trump and that was before this heinous act on Saturday near where I live. That iconic picture alone will ensure Trump's victory.
Ludicrously out of step. I'll never understand the need of British pundits to talk with an American that wouldn't get booked for public access TV in the US. You have ill-informed your viewers. You could at least get a milquetoast never Trumper to talk with.
Hi all, 1. Look for inconsistencies: If you listen carefully to the gunfire, it doesn't sound like clear bursts of fire as you would expect from the assault weapon found in possession of the downed, alleged gunman. Instead, it sounds more like a series of discrete shots. 2. Identify the beneficiaries: Who stands to benefit from this event? Who else? How might they be connected? ua-cam.com/video/o4jcKXicZ3Y/v-deo.htmlsi=UiH5ydMkUD1ko6mQ ua-cam.com/users/shortsL1bwklRWKWQ?si=ML6Ubge4seBexyNm 3. Examine the evidence: Have any medical reports been published? What do eye witnesses report? 4. Follow the media coverage: notice whether it seems coordinated or excessively uniform, including the comments on this video. 5. Check for a pattern: See if similar events have happened before and they followed any similar patterns, such as the assassination attempt on Pope John Paul II. What do all these factors tell you?
Why would someone (you) who's clearly right-wing MAGA (1) watch New Statesman videos, and (2) expect them to reflect your political views? IMHO, you might be better off sticking to Fox News and Newsmax.
Biden needs to stand down so the discussion can change
There's still time but not much
Has he even acknowledged the guy that died, or the other wounded people?
Yes, in his first public address after the incident whilst he was still in hospital.
@@Heligoland360 Oh, right. There's been such blanket coverage of 'the shooting', obviously that aspect wasn't widely reported.
Yes his very first statement did exactly that
Biden has been on national television, all networks, three times since the shooting, the first time just about two hours after it happened, and again at 1pm and 8pm Sunday, and with this prominently figured. If you've missed this, I guess it's one further datapoint about media coverage in this election.
The wife of the fire chief that died said that she heard nothing from Donald Trump. Joe Biden was talking to her by phone and gave a little comfort at an awful time for her family.
I'm liberal, center-based. Even I find this conversation trully delusional. With all the respect to people having it..
This video has really missed the mark & misjudged the mood in America right now. On what planet is this a springboard for Biden to revive his campaign? Bias shines through this video, disappointing because it’s not like New Statesmen
politics is very volatile at the moment and anything can happen over the next few weeks. the mood can change.
It did end on 'Biden is already losing and this puts him even further behind' How grim do you want it to be?
@@ferguscampbell5828 it may have ended with that but majority of guest dialog was amateur nonsense
@@ilof8125 Then that's the conclusion they came to - they looked at the possibilities and decided they probably wouldn't happen or if they did they wouldn't work. That's how discussion works - you look at the situation, you weigh it up and come to a conclusion. We don't get enough of that as far as I can see.
@@ferguscampbell5828 Fair do’s, just not New Statesmen’s usual standard imo
Why the Bolsonaro moment ain't mentioned more recurrently?
It was similar event on a similarly incindiarry politician to see how politics has dealt with an event like this
Really amateur take here. Are they including the BLM riots in left-wing violence?
Evidently not.
Huge number of right-wing trolls commenting here... I've seen this on a few leftish videos in the past few days. I guess it's a campaign...
That’s not the photograph
I think it's because the guy that took the photo is probably charging exorbitant prices. So people can't afford it or he already sold the rights to a news outlet.
still going on about this little ear scratch....
can we stop saying 'President Trump' lol
all past presidents in America retain the title President - whether you like it or not
@@global_nomad.yeah, it’s stupid. The Americans can call them what they want, but generally we don’t refer to ex presidents as president in the uk. So, yeah, they should stop
Why do people not think that T ignored the security concerns to play to his rhetoric? Did he not say, "they are not here to hurt me"
Step down
Wrong first question, Hannh, instead ask what on earth can Republicans do now?
Ex-Brit, now American here.
These guests are living in some parallel universe if they think Biden can turn this thing around.
I've talked to some undecideds here over the weekend and to a man and woman they're voting for Trump in Nov.
As I will be...
@@xunqianbaidu6917 Sure you have, lol...
@@xunqianbaidu6917 You don't have to.
Over at The Hill they were discussing this this morning and they said word from Dem sources is the Dems are now resigned to Trump being reelected as our 47th.
Polling on Friday had Trump leading in all the swing states and taking Nevada. There's now multiple paths to 270 Electoral College votes for Trump and that was before this heinous act on Saturday near where I live.
That iconic picture alone will ensure Trump's victory.
Why would you vote for a conman? Like, what do you think you’re going to get out of it?
@@alst4817 Exactly, why would anyone ever vote for Biden!
@@ubik372huh, my comment disappeared! But seriously, can you answer the question instead of dodging it?
enjoy your bubble
Yours will be burst by the popular vote, however much you gerrymander the swing states.
Don't like these journos talking as if they can tell a particular theory is a conspiracy, my: advice: think before you talk.
are the blm riots being classified as political violence here? i expect not
Somehow they were just forgotten about. So much for the lefts caring and inclusive policies
Get reelected?
It's obscene that people could support this elder abuse.
Ludicrously out of step. I'll never understand the need of British pundits to talk with an American that wouldn't get booked for public access TV in the US. You have ill-informed your viewers. You could at least get a milquetoast never Trumper to talk with.
Pathetic journalism. As a regular New Statesman viewer I'm disappointed.
God just listening yourselves. Time you bunch looked in the mirror
Hi all,
1. Look for inconsistencies: If you listen carefully to the gunfire, it doesn't sound like clear bursts of fire as you would expect from the assault weapon found in possession of the downed, alleged gunman. Instead, it sounds more like a series of discrete shots.
2. Identify the beneficiaries: Who stands to benefit from this event? Who else? How might they be connected?
ua-cam.com/video/o4jcKXicZ3Y/v-deo.htmlsi=UiH5ydMkUD1ko6mQ
ua-cam.com/users/shortsL1bwklRWKWQ?si=ML6Ubge4seBexyNm
3. Examine the evidence: Have any medical reports been published? What do eye witnesses report?
4. Follow the media coverage: notice whether it seems coordinated or excessively uniform, including the comments on this video.
5. Check for a pattern: See if similar events have happened before and they followed any similar patterns, such as the assassination attempt on Pope John Paul II.
What do all these factors tell you?
This is not true…you are nuts
You should learn what 'rhetoric' means. It's not just the things people are saying
Great ruling by Judge Cannon this morning!!
Why would someone (you) who's clearly right-wing MAGA (1) watch New Statesman videos, and (2) expect them to reflect your political views? IMHO, you might be better off sticking to Fox News and Newsmax.
@@malcolmmann436 I guess I'll choose whatever news source I want, you get no say in the matter.
PS; Born a Brit, proud American by choice.