13 - Adding Two Vectors Graphically in Physics (Vector Sum & Resultant Vectors)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 тра 2024
  • View more lessons like this at www.MathTutorDVD.com
    In this lesson, we will learn how to add vectors graphically in order to find the sum of two vectors. This process is called finding the resultant vector.
    In this process, the vectors are drawn head to tail and then the resultant vector is drawn from the tail of the first vector to the head of the second vector.
    We calculate the sum of vectors for many purposes. We might add two forces together or add two displacement vectors. We can even add angular momentum vectors or add velocity vectors. The process works for any two vectors that should be added together to solve physics problems.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 56

  • @MarketMaker23
    @MarketMaker23 10 місяців тому +8

    For the past six months I’ve been self studying calc, trig and physics in hope that I make a career change to engineering. These videos are making a lot of sense and helping stay on course. Thank you for your service

  • @profenk
    @profenk 9 місяців тому +3

    Knowing you used to work at NASA just makes me want to watch more

  • @fatimamiranda3191
    @fatimamiranda3191 2 роки тому +11

    This is for sure one of the best classes I've ever had. Thank you.

  • @letsgivepuppieslovetoo9730
    @letsgivepuppieslovetoo9730 2 роки тому +18

    If every teacher is good at teaching like you , everyone in the world would've been good at science courses ,
    Thanks for your good work sir.

  • @kath1785
    @kath1785 3 роки тому +51

    as a student I learned more from your video than the teachers in the philippines teach it, not with bias but that is the truth. Keep theaching Sir❤✨

    • @MathAndScience
      @MathAndScience  3 роки тому +11

      Thank you so much!

    • @thegamingdemon4788
      @thegamingdemon4788 2 роки тому +4

      Same bro

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 Рік тому

      @@MathAndScience Gravity is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Consider what is E=MC2, AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Consider what is THE EYE !!! Notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE !!! (Think about what is water !!) Notice what is the orange (AND setting) Sun. Think about what is lava. Lava IS orange, AND it is even blood red !!! Consider, ON BALANCE, what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Again, consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE; AND consider WHAT IS E=MC2 !!! The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. NOW, consider WHAT IS E=MC2 in conjunction WITH what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/AS SPACE; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, ON BALANCE, consider what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON. CLEARLY, WHAT IS E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent (ON BALANCE). c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). CLEARLY, it is all correct and proven ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Again, consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE.
      The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT AND description is improved in the truly superior mind. Indeed, BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Great.
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 Рік тому

      @@MathAndScience WHY AND HOW THE BALANCED, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS CONSISTENT WITH F=MA AND E=MC2:
      The following also CLEARLY explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.
      c squared represents a dimension of SPACE on balance WITH the fact that the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Indeed, the sky is blue; AND what is THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE (on balance) !! Consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c) (ON BALANCE); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is (CLEARLY AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE).
      General Relativity is directly taken from Special Relativity. E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. I have exposed Einstein. Beautiful.
      Note: Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Think carefully about the black “space” AS WELL. Great. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, as BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. THE EYE represents a two dimensional surface OR SPACE (ON BALANCE) that is consistent with F=ma AND E=mc2. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN/ON BALANCE.
      Consider what is THE SUN. The sky is blue, and THE EARTH/ground is ALSO BLUE. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GREAT. E=mc2 IS F=ma. This explains the fourth dimension AND the term c4 from Einstein's field equations. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental.
      By Frank DiMeglio

  • @phoebedavis1614
    @phoebedavis1614 3 роки тому +6

    I've been looking for an explanation to your third example for 2 days now. My professor couldn’t explain something so simple thank you SO much.

  • @yukengrowtopia
    @yukengrowtopia 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you very much! This really helped me out and I’m just starting! ♥️

  • @fabblo5588
    @fabblo5588 3 роки тому +2

    much-thumbed for the teacher who highly professional teaching like him.

  • @tebibusolomon1529
    @tebibusolomon1529 4 роки тому +2

    so perfect i like it........we need more videos don't stop

  • @michelmoor1
    @michelmoor1 Рік тому +1

    Thank you so much. It was very very useful. So creative in explanation and examples.

  • @NunesPensador
    @NunesPensador 4 роки тому +19

    I thankful for living in an era I can just learn things people died creating/descovering

  • @GeorgiosMichalopoulos
    @GeorgiosMichalopoulos 2 роки тому +1

    Great explanation, thank you!!

  • @No-ek6jk
    @No-ek6jk 3 роки тому +1

    ur lessons are the best thing ever!!!!

  • @lovet1309
    @lovet1309 3 роки тому +6

    What a great teacher you are!

  • @janiceanoka7229
    @janiceanoka7229 5 років тому +2

    Bless your heart

  • @sanoopvenugopal9868
    @sanoopvenugopal9868 4 роки тому +2

    Has any proof for triangular and parallelogram vector addition?

  • @tanithwaldie827
    @tanithwaldie827 6 місяців тому

    Brilliant videos thank you. My daughter is homeschooled and these are very helpful.

  • @aaronnjobvu4252
    @aaronnjobvu4252 Рік тому

    NICE EXPLANTION U HV OPEN MY HEARD ON VACTORS AS A ZAMBIAN STUDENT THANKS AOLT

  • @amjaddahabreh2168
    @amjaddahabreh2168 Рік тому

    Amazing and amusing!!!

  • @cruzatemmanuel7673
    @cruzatemmanuel7673 Рік тому

    Thank you so much. It very useful 🥰

  • @rayda8
    @rayda8 5 місяців тому

    THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE SIR , YOU ARE THE BEST TEACHER.

  • @Gangsta0wns456
    @Gangsta0wns456 3 роки тому +2

    This guy is phenomenal

  • @tresajessygeorge210
    @tresajessygeorge210 7 місяців тому

    THANK YOU... SIR...!!!

  • @tkub77
    @tkub77 5 місяців тому

    Where can I find the next part to this video?

  • @olajumokefamuyide9640
    @olajumokefamuyide9640 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks so much for this lesson. My question is, must the resultant force always connect to the tail of vector force 1? Is that how it works?

  • @CyprianKosi-ws7vc
    @CyprianKosi-ws7vc 7 місяців тому

    Thank you sir
    God bless you 🙇🏻‍♂️

    • @unknown_30618
      @unknown_30618 7 місяців тому

      Can i ask you ? What major are you studying?

  • @jaketaraj763
    @jaketaraj763 2 роки тому +1

    Start video at 13:00 if you want skip the intuitive stuff.

  • @FatimaDHero
    @FatimaDHero 2 роки тому +1

    33:00 The Rocket Would Be Destroyed Right?

  • @kaneeneemanuel4889
    @kaneeneemanuel4889 Рік тому

    Thanks so much l getting more understanding than l did at Kings college budo

  • @hannahdivic28
    @hannahdivic28 4 роки тому +5

    In the last video you never got to vectors, can you reupload it or something to say what a vector actually is?

    • @MathAndScience
      @MathAndScience  4 роки тому +7

      I uploaded the full version for you here:
      ua-cam.com/video/V_CJXlgar8Y/v-deo.html
      Good luck in your studies!
      Jason, MathAndScience.com

    • @silverstar5091
      @silverstar5091 3 роки тому

      @@MathAndScience Thank you, I was about to ask the same question as HeyHannah

  • @Cafecito_sfm
    @Cafecito_sfm 2 місяці тому

    No example problems?

  • @horatiowolfe9025
    @horatiowolfe9025 2 роки тому

    I'm 28 and I never wanted to learn at school but upon leaving, I find myself having that thirst for knowledge and I guess starting now is better than not starting at all. I'm really enjoying these episodes and I feel like I'm learning a lot however, I'm a little confused.
    I'm sure you'll explain it if I continue watching, but at 34:40, you said that it doesn't matter what order you add vectors because the resultant will be the same. This confuses me because I thought vectors show direction and magnitude, so you have to take into consideration of the positive and negative signs... How does the result become the same?
    Again, I left school 13 years ago and I've panicked about attempting this subject since finishing so my math is on point as it used to be and I'm sure it'll make sense the further through the course I go.
    Thank you for these videos. Maybe I won't be a cleaner for much longer haha

    • @horatiowolfe9025
      @horatiowolfe9025 2 роки тому

      I think I'm getting confused... Its been a long day haha. Maybe I need a break. I'll get it at some point. You're explanations are perfect. You've helped me understand a few things that I couldn't grasp before, and I hope it's all worth the grind in the end. Thank you

    • @MathAndScience
      @MathAndScience  2 роки тому +2

      @@horatiowolfe9025 You'll get there man, I promise. Regarding adding vectors in any order, think of this example. Say you walk EAST 5 km then walk SOUTH 3 km. You will be at some location roughly southeast from your starting position. These are all vectors. The first leg and the second leg are all vectors and the final location is a vector with respect to the starting point. Now, start over, except this time, first walk SOUTH 3 km, then walk EAST 5 km. The only difference is the order of the walking, but you end up in the same location. You "added" the vectors in a different way but got to the same place. That is basically it and it works for adding any number of vectors.

    • @horatiowolfe9025
      @horatiowolfe9025 2 роки тому

      @@MathAndScience Minutes after I left that comment, I managed understand it thank you. I was just getting confused because of the sign. Adding scalars are always positive and that's simple, but you have to take into consideration of the sign when adding vectors and I always thought that mixing positive and negative in different ways don't always give the same answer and that's why I was confused. I appreciate the reply thank you. I'll be sure to pay for your courses on your website once I've got some more knowledge behind me

  • @roinakhaleqi5565
    @roinakhaleqi5565 Рік тому

    could i question and you answer it

  • @user-lg8gw6ij5f
    @user-lg8gw6ij5f 8 місяців тому

    this totally helped me! (i failed my quiz)

  • @jbergamp
    @jbergamp Рік тому

    "...i used to work in NASA" take that 😉

  • @SundayObasi-vx8sh
    @SundayObasi-vx8sh 3 місяці тому

    I don't understand

  • @legendarysavage6618
    @legendarysavage6618 Рік тому

    Sir, you used to work at nasa?😅

  • @mukhtaarjaamac8763
    @mukhtaarjaamac8763 2 роки тому

    3blue 1brown even not explain like this

  • @babitarpitsaini9382
    @babitarpitsaini9382 3 роки тому +1

    hxddccfjjsjcsjcjjshdjjdhxdhxcdndncbdjjxdhcjhdhdhjddjcndnfdndjdjdhchfxhdhshxhshdhdjcfjzjfksksdkfkdkdjfjdjdhsufudjsrbsjfhdjfjdfjdhjrdnfndjcjfjchsjfjsjcjfdjjddddjjfjffjdjjdfhjhhfchdhfuujdjdjjdjdjjjcdncjdjcjdjfkaalakkaalddikdkgcjsngndjtusjgrisjugsuauuqudkwigksjgskcjsjfjr

  • @SundayObasi-vx8sh
    @SundayObasi-vx8sh 3 місяці тому

    I don't understand