As a child I was not allowed to study physics, it was a case of ‘only study what you’ve already scored highly on’ rather than subjects that excited me - without physics I just didn’t get any sense out of chemistry either (maybe it was just bad teaching, who knows now?) but, at a couple of weeks off 70 years old I’m still fascinated and learning all I can. As a child I remember clinging to the saddle of an out of control, galloping horse and another time being chased by a dog and gamekeeper through the whipping twigs of a forest and later laughing out loud and shedding tears of delight at the birth of my sons and, you know, watching this video delivered up bits of all that rolled into one. Thank you so very much, will have to watch this again and again. Absolutely knackered now 😄
You must have gone to school in the USA, that's their wicked way of "Dumbing the kids down". The truth about this whacky "CLICK BAIT" programme is that the power necessary is Electricity, as the whole Universe & everything in it runs on electricity flowing in Plasma. You only have to ask the correct branch of Science. The Institute for Electricity (IEEE), to get at the known proven facts. Astronomers & Physicists have NO qualifications in "Electrical Behaviour" so are literally living in the dark on this one !!!
Thank you so much. It's truly inspiring to hear how, even after all these years, your curiosity and passion for learning, especially in physics, remain undiminished. Your enthusiasm is a reminder that learning knows no age. Happy birthday! 😊
Once you open this door you can't get enough. Astrophysicists are just curious minds like us. They are just much better at math.lol. once I started gobbling these theories up saw that my own simple mind had similar thoughts. And all of the science still leans heavily on theory when applied to the universe. The greatest minds still don't know the answers. And most likely never will.
The repulsive force of 2 protons in a nucleus is 20lbs. That's unbelievable. And the strong force is a hundred times stronger!!! That certainly helps bring into perspective the type of energy bound up in atoms. That is probably the most profound piece of information I've acquired in years!!
@@jdlechThat's why modern atomic bombs are always two fases, the first is fission to create enough heat to trigger a fusion reaction which is the true powerhouse of the bomb and doesn't have a theoretical limit
This video gives a description of particles that seems to be relatively coherent, logical and easy to understand. Even though I got my atomic physics education a LONG TIME AGO (60 yrs), it was recent enough for me to see how this newer & more complex system features blends and extends beyond what I remember of my past atomic theory. I think this presentation is one of the VERY BEST I've listened to. KUDOS! You've done a wonderful job to make a text that even an 85 yo brain can digest! THANK YOU SIRS!
I'm glad to hear that the video provided a clear and understandable explanation of particle physics, and that it effectively built upon and expanded your knowledge from your atomic physics education. It's wonderful that it resonated with you, proving to be accessible and engaging even years after your formal studies. Your appreciation for the effort put into making complex scientific concepts digestible is heartening. Thank you for your kind words! 😊
I hope that one day (soon) more people will truly understand what an absolute privilege it is to be alive and to be part of our magical and wonderful universe...our planet would be a much better place (jmho). When I was a child my physics teacher told me that all the atoms in my body came from different stars and I was "hooked on" our amazing universe. I thank you for this informative, fun, and beautiful upload...and I hope that our universe is kind to you all 🌎☮
@@brendansherlock6442 yeah after reading a well thought out comment I figured there would be some dimwitted religious nonsense replying to it. Thanks for not disappointing, also your favorite fanfic claims your creator made humans from dirt with magic.
@@DistinctiveBlendas a secular materialist, You do know that... Materialistic scientists do Not know the source of human Consciousness and Life -- living organisms. The Limitations of Materialism.
@@steveflorida5849 wait wait are you telling me science doesn't understand everything?!?! Well I'm now convinced I should believe a sky fairy made everything with magic...
The answer is that a high energy moving electron was captured by a nucleus when it reached its periphery and since that time electrons are continuously revolving around the nucleus and thus leads to the formation of atoms 🌞
Quite a comprehensive overview from fundamental particles to the Cosmo into our very own existence and after life. More importantly, to me that is, I'm glued to the screen and surprisingly understand. Great job and keep up the good work. From Hong Kong
@@bigscientificquestions I have listened to the first 6 minutes many times and I'm still not understanding how the question you started with "Where do electrons get the energy to spin around an atom's nucleus?". I think you say "because of the principles of quantum mechanics, the electron can never reach the nucleus, becoming perpetually stuck in orbit." But I'd like a more complete answer. You don't need to answer this. Look at my reply to this question.
I asked ChatGPT and here is the answer Here's how it works: Absorption: When an electron absorbs energy, it temporarily moves to a higher energy level. This energy can come from various sources, such as photons of specific frequencies (which correspond to the energy difference between the initial and final energy levels) or external electric fields. Emission: When the electron returns to a lower energy level, it emits energy in the form of a photon. This emitted photon carries away the energy difference between the two energy levels. The energy is released into the surroundings, which can include the surrounding space or other particles in the atom. So, while electrons can change energy levels and emit or absorb energy, the total energy within a closed system is conserved. Energy exchanges within a closed system, in discrete, quantized steps, and the total energy of the system remains constant according to the principle of conservation of energy. For a more detailed answer you can see the entire chat at chat.openai.com/share/d3f7a0d1-57f6-418d-bb0d-010d48e7a9b9
@@BobCampbell530I'm only 5½ minutes into this, and it seems that the atom has been described as a perpetual motion machine! I don't think the question of where atoms get their energy was answered at all, at least not at the grassroots level. It's an "emperor's new clothes" answer, and you're just supposed to accept that it's due to the characteristics of their quantum nature. Might as well just say: "Because, that's why", or "That's just the way it is". But I will soldier on, to see if the rest of the video gets to the point, or drowns out the question in a torrent of hypothetical gobbledygook. I remain optimistic! Onwards!
I@@F8Tributo I can't seem to find the answer to my own question that I posted later, but the energy comes from photons OUTSIDE of the atoms. I don't think that was made very clear in the article, but I found my answer through ChatGPT.
After watching this fantastic video end to end, I am a bit more knowledgeable, though I admit, I have to watch this for atleast a few more times to get more understanding. As I watched this hour long video, few doubts arose but since I failed to pause and jot down these, I will pen down my doubts after I watch a second or third time. Brilliant work, soothing voice and simple explanation to a complexity which mankind has yet to grasp.
Excellent video, in one hour you described most of physics, most comprehensive video I saw until now…. I think that from any sentence in this video someone can make a one hour video… 😊 really good explanation without so many sentences, brief and brilliant.
@@bigscientificquestions Constructive criticism: lose the background noise! The subject & your narration of it is great. The addition of distracting & annoying music ruined the vid for me, I didn't get past a couple of minutes.
At 9:04, I always felt as a layperson that this “mystery” makes inflation problematic. But recently I found Alan Guth explaining it matter of factly, not as a “mystery” at all. The “energy” that drove this is initiated as a typical fluctuation in the vacuum, due to NEGATIVE PRESSURE DENSITY. This situation is implied to be happening constantly and randomly….meaning outside of our bubble it is happening all over the place (a version of multiverse better thought of multi bubble of the cosmos in general). The bubble doubles in size about 100 times before an inevitable phase transition occurs that stops the “inflationary period of time” (and thus any further inflation events in our own bubble). The phase transition is important to understand because it book ends the concept of start and stop, and can eventually be observed (in theory). So if you buy the inflation concept at all, NO it is not a mysterious force that drove the expansion then stopped. It is negative pressure density due to quantum chaos of the vacuum and its virtual particle situation (which is real and verified in experiments).
Thank you, I really think I learned something, ...I think. Highly interesting and informative. Now, I'll just have to give myself time to ponder these thoughts and give my molecules time to calm down and return to vibrating harmonically again, as they are in a very excited state right now. Great stuff!
Thank you so much for your thoughtful comment! It's wonderful to hear that you found the information exciting and thought-provoking. It's like our minds are a symphony of ideas, and sometimes they need a moment to find their harmonious rhythm once again. 😊
"...a symphony of ideas...", I like the image. Thanks again. I look forward to more of the same in the future. Basically, we are all children staring up at the night sky.@@bigscientificquestions
ua-cam.com/channels/DmikjslWwIlxJDpiimuQ3w.html This is false information! No uman as ever seen a point in space. Some irratnal humas claimed to see a point wen they see a picture of a point.
The amount of ads in this video is borderline criminal. People are trying to watch this while falling asleep only to have their ears wrecked every 3 minutes. Fk this
I am a Mechanical engineer. This video is really interesting. Can we compare human body with universe? Can we see the bigbang with our biological body? Moreover Are we the only intelligent being in the universe? 13:15
The macro mirrors the micro. All of life has intelligence. It's just different levels. Humans are just a bunch of atoms after all. Does every cell in your body have intelligence, or just some?
@@shiva.chennai maybe we can.. but first you have to define what you want to measure.. and that would only be a scale of intelligence based on the definition you have chosen..
The music has discordant notes not conducive to learning. Disallusionment and a hopeless passing of time. Its much like a new science book where they hit you hard at first to weed out those that arent willing to sacrifice discomfort for learning the basics no matter what. The notes are irritating and eventually harmful, prompting cortisol, which should increase catecholamines, much like caffeine. I would bet its cancer causing if played loud enough. Then, theres the pressure. " I better get this the first time around or suffer a curious sort of monotany."
For me, the biggest question no-one is discussing is "Exactly what is electric charge? and how does an electron get exactly -1 and the u type quarks get +2/3 charge and d type get -1/3 charge? And the anti electron gets +1 charge and the anti-quarks get -2/3 or +1/3." So what IS electric charge? What single or multiple of "things" confer electric charge on things? Is it the same "thing" for electrons and quarks? I think i understand magnetism IF electric charge is given.
It really gets you thinking about the beginning of the universe. We started as a ball or raw energy, due to fluctuations its started to combine it kept getting more and more complex and dense until stars were born. When stars die, heavy elements are made, making planets and eventually us. It cant be just a bunch of random events?
Yet, the universe did not collapse in on itself. You're breaking the "rules" if you think the mass of the universe would not collapse in on itself, even 1 million years after the big bang. ....and define the word "theory" for us???
@joeturner9219adorable how you use the words in the bible to PROVE the bible. Here, lemme try. "i am the most handsome man on earth" me 1:1 Wow, who knew life could be so convenient
First. Think of standing in the dark, looking out at the universe's galaxies, spinning about each other, around space and time. Each capable of housing the lives of Humankind. Now. Think about standing at a window, looking out at the street people walking. Their minds. Spinning around each other, throughout space and time. Eachmind capable of housing the concepts of the entire universe. It's like multiple unverses, housing multiple universes,, inside of what may be. more multiple universes. Don't even get me started on cells and molecules, atoms, electrons and particles so infinitely small we cannot see them any better than we can the insides of a blackhole.
I have to listen to this several more times. I love it. You have opened a world of marvelous curious knowledge i would have never know if wasnt for this video as my world revolves around a different science. I am so thankful for this knowledge. I want more of this trivia, and explanations. LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
my research and study indicate that electrons and all subatomic particles are powered directly by the dirac sea of infinite energy, which is powered directly by the energy that is the material universe. i realize there are highly complex ways to say this but i am stating this in the simplest terms and least words possible. one gentleman explained to me that it would take him four years to explain where an electron gets its energy to spin. i have also read this explained as, the zero point field, also called gravity waves, dirac sea, virtual particle flux fields, tachyon waves, cosmic energy, dark energy, dark matter, heaviside component, zero point vacuum fluxuation dynamics, and infinite energy from the vacuum, powers the material universe, and the energy that is the material universe powers the infinite energy from the vacuum. a perpetual, self maintaining symbiotic system.
The strong force adds about 1000 times the mass of the three quarks making up the protons and neutrons. This is probably due to the high energy density of the gluons being exchanged by the quarks.
It's just difficult to explain. That's also how I understand it, but then it'd mean gluons have mass or otherwise if they are massless they vibrate (move) with a speed of light?
@@yanair2091according to the standard model they do move with the speed of light all massless particles have to move with the speed of light. 99% of the mass of the proton (and neutron) comes from kinetic energy of particles inside them. Inside of the nucleon is a big bubbly soup of gluons constantly exchanging color charge and particles popping up into existence and then annihilating.
This video was amazing!!! I thoroughly enjoyed it, yeah okay the music was a little bit much now and again but its plain to see a lot of work went into it........
I admire your intelligence, it is easy to learn(understand) difficult principes, thanx to your gift to make such a great video! Thank you forever. Rare quality standard you just demonstrated here, I hope you continue on, doing even better (if it is even possible:))!
21:00 Having two identical atoms in the same state is not only unlikely it is fundamentally impossible under our current understanding of physics except under extremely specific conditions like those that form a BEC. This is what the Pauli Exclusion Principle is telling us that two particles can not exist in the same location in Hibert Space. Since Atoms are made of the Quantum particles this theory is discussing achieving the same quantum states needed to create two identical atoms is impossible. There are Bose Einstein Condensates( BECs) which achieve something along these lines at extremely low energies but when this happens all the particles start to behave as one single unified Wave function, almost like, Quantum Entangling all the Quarks that make up the cloud of Atoms such that they form one unified Wavefunction acting as a single particle.
Tremendous piece of work. I would prefer the cadences of a real spoken voice to create interest (and to better pronounce a few words like 'integer' and 'hadron').
7:00 The Big Bang doesn't explain the two questions that I think are the most mind boggling questions possible. 1. Was there ever nothing? 2. If there was ever nothing, where did something come from?
Here's one stunning comment for everyone to look at, learn from and hear: Atoms can't evolve! Isaac Newton full well knew the gravity of the statement and that is exactly why he was a devout Christian man as was Michael Faraday, Leo Tolstoy, Joseph Priestley and all the great minds of past and present knew that there had to be an all-powerful God in order to set things in place. In more recent times even Albert Einstein acknowledged the existence of the Almighty. That God's name is Yahweh God the Father Almighty with his son Jesus Christ at his side.
Brilliant video. Still, one thing I didn’t understand in part I: at 4:40 onwards you say “The total energy of an electron in orbit [=kinetic+potential] is +negative+”, while simultaneously explaining that the attracting force of the positive nucleus must be exactly matched by an opposite force driving the electron onwards in order for the atom as a whole to remain stable. But it seems to me the latter would imply the total energy mentioned earlier should be +zero+ (in order to keep the whole atom stable). If it is negative instead, wouldn’t that mean the electon would require a constant stream of additional energy to keep orbiting? Or put more generally: how can matter (even as tiny as an electron) have permanent negative energy? I’m assuming I’m either completely misunderstanding or missing something, but can someone please point out to me the error in my thinking?
Actually the electrostatic potential energy of a stationary electron at the infinite distance from the nucleus is taken as zero and as the electron approaches towards the nucleus, the electrostatic attraction is in the same direction as the motion, which means the potential energy of the electron starts to decrease so lesser than zero that make it negative. Now, if the electron just “fell” straight in toward the nucleus, it would gain kinetic energy and the total energy (potential plus kinetic) would stay zero. But some of that kinetic energy gets lost to photons emitted by the atom as the electron drops into lower and lower orbitals and its total energy becomes negative. The electron also has kinetic energy. Kinetic energy can never be negative (because in K.E expression we have squared of velocity which is always positive) and it is smaller in magnitude than the potential energy. Source: Byju
Yeah, im too, not just the particles but where the energy came from??? Was it a creator who made all these THINGS? BTW, I’m not religious person, just can’t understand the Big Bang theory .
The universe being similar to an atoms size is something I always wondered. Or do sub atomic particles have near infinite amounts of space and time inside or near them? We know time and space can bend and stretch but no one knows to what limits, if there are any limits.
Not the easiest, but certainly one of the most rewarding videos I've seen. The fact that people have worked this out is quite remarkable. However I think the most fundamental questions will never be answered. T=1 will forever elude us.
This video is incredible! I'm loving every second. I do have a question. If information transfer within the universe is limited to the speed of light, where does quantum entanglement fit within this limit? As I understand it does transmit information at speeds not limited by the speed of light. I will be looking forward to a reply from someone far better informed on this than me.
Thank you so much 😊 This question was also the reason for Einstein's objection to quantum entanglement, you can watch this video about how Einstein was proved wrong: ua-cam.com/video/zcW_m36bVVQ/v-deo.html
Can someone explain to me why videos like this imply or state the old theory is wrong, then spend an hour explaining the wrong theory, after which they spend 30 seconds stating the previous hour was debunked by some find?
A good video. The standard model tells us what nature does but not why. I hope that as particle accelerators advance, we'll get a better handle on what the fabric of space is made of.
We already know what the fabric of space is made of. Everything in the universe is compromised of energy vibrating or oscillating at different frequencies.
@@xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x I believe the fabric of space is a field of energy as well. Perhaps one day we'll be able to observe it's composure. I believe that will be what makes us capable of true space travel.
Amazing what the human imagination can create. From myths of gods to myths of the beginning of the universe. We create the symbols that represent sounds, apply meaning and definition to the sounds, and then apply that imagination to the universe’s make up. The reality we exist in isn’t enough for us.
very interesting , i could though point to the Bose Einstein temperature about the atom properties on absolute zero ,also it is fascinating how nature made the neutron ,if you leave it alone or it doesnt fit it decays ,but if you put it in a symmetrical or balanced atom or a neutron star it doesnt break and usually we get lots of energy when things shrink or break
@@CrakenFlux thanks for the note ,i ll correct it , ok break like in 2 pieces or more right but as a matter of fact if 2 pieces or more will brake on each other they will still release energy and possibly break :p was a bit funny though
The cause of electron spin is the flow of vacuum free energy density. The electron splits the thin lepton structure of the vacuum with a charge, the electron acquires energy in the quantum field of the vacuum, energy is exchanged, spin and magneton appear. I repeat, the electron acquires an energy level in vacuum, is at its energy level of vacuum due to the splitting of the vacuum fine structure, entering into the structure of fluctuations.
Good video very comprehensive and I backed it up in several spots to listen to the concepts over a couple of times and will save the video and watch it again it is very informative and you have done a very good job in the format that you presented the subject, three cheers to you and anyone else that participated in the creation of this documentary
Made it to thirty mins, and then lost the ability to keep up.... I need to learn more of the basics on sub atomics particles I think.... this is answering questions I would not have the knowledge to ask in the first place... will save and come back when I am wiser (and more sober) ;p
Perhaps the problem is in we’re examining a reaction like it is a state, the observation process must be begun with/within the observer. The observer directly affects the observed.❤❤❤
There's something very assertive and resolute in the manner in which this narrator speaks that's utterly hypnotic and captivating to me. It takes me to a full trance state. 😅 👍
Your description of electrons dancing according to the amount of light energy they receive seems analogous to light energy being a source of nutrition for hungry electrons that consume the light. Reality is too strange to conceive and we know too little to form a coherent picture, that is my experience. Without light, could electrons still dance?
@@bigscientificquestions 9 out of 10 of your animations show wholly inappropriate (macro scale) interactions that do not properly illustrate the counter-intuitive quantum realm. I cannot agree with other comments by your fan-base that say this is the best animation possible. Good effort but you perpetuate the ideas that we can intuit this stuff whereas it is actually not at all like the world we are familiar with.
Here's one stunning comment for everyone to look at, learn from and hear: Atoms can't evolve! Isaac Newton full well knew the gravity of the statement and that is exactly why he was a devout Christian man as was Michael Faraday, Leo Tolstoy, Joseph Priestley and all the great minds of past and present knew that there had to be an all-powerful God in order to set things in place. In more recent times even Albert Einstein acknowledged the existence of the Almighty. That God's name is Yahweh God the Father Almighty with his son Jesus Christ at his side.
"God said" is an expression just to relate to the human we are. That Almighty never spoke to anyone and does not have the characteristics the bible attributes to IT! IT is not a HE and certainly has no name. Yahweh is just a megalomaniac, a powerful being who used humanity ignorance of things to establish himself as a ruler. Period
Sorry to say that when the woman giving birth after birth the new born baby cannot go back in to the womb again this is called the power of God like that about the numbers in neumaralagi 1= A ,2=B ,3=C, 4,=D, 5=E up to 26,=Z and here 26 is not called BF as this to say that about 10 means 25s as 55 and 12 is 26 as 66 like that 2+5=7 and 2+6=8 .In this after 25 the next number is 26 but when we take these numbers as 10 and 12 and where is the number 11 so the secret is 10= 1 as 1+0=1 , 1+1=2, 1+2=3 called 1,2,3 or A B C . And about 10 and 12 called 10 J and 12 L .JL means water in Indian language JAL and if we take 11 that 10 11 12 J AA L means NET in the Indian language and 5+5 is EE and 12 is L here EEL means fish here to tell where is water there will be fish ,net ,ship and in the ship Novah built 3 storee to know these things see the image of the universe in this by measuring and watching we get all the answers And the power of God as in the Bible Daniel 7 chap time times and half time and Solomon built the steps 5, 6 7 and about many secrets we are seeing but not abcerving and this 2025 2926 as 2+5=7 and 2+6=8 here the 7 is Jesus place and 8 is Jehovah place and there is no time the given. time is over and also about 5 cartons and 6 cartons both length 30 width 4 and make 5 and 6 cartons together or stich then it will be 11 cartons as 11x4= 44 and 30 x 11=330 these are the steps to go to 7th place as 2023 and 2024 as 2+3 =5 and 2+4=6 so wait and watch and 23 24 is Mene mene and 10 11 12 is T K L and this is the Judgement days and see the pictures Thankyou.. photos.app.goo.gl/X1EyHhhsmcbzVGbu9
Amazingly this confirms Buddhism is a great philosophy and agrees 100% with Abhidhamma, which is the science and logics of Buddhism. Thank you very much for this great insight 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏and for me having studied Abhidhamma made me to comprehend and bridge knowledge between modern science and Buddhism.
Here's one stunning comment for everyone to look at, learn from and hear: Atoms can't evolve! Isaac Newton full well knew the gravity of the statement and that is exactly why he was a devout Christian man as was Michael Faraday, Leo Tolstoy, Joseph Priestley and all the great minds of past and present knew that there had to be an all-powerful God in order to set things in place. In more recent times even Albert Einstein acknowledged the existence of the Almighty. That God's name is Yahweh God the Father Almighty with his son Jesus Christ at his side.
When we die, atoms in our bodies generally disintegrate into the universe, or specifically, into the earth, where we came from. Life holds these atoms in their places. Without life, atoms would drift into space and may form part of other matters, living or non-living. It is really a cycle. The universe is constant. Part of it may die and disintegrate but it would eventually return to the same universe in some form or another.
atom is the force of energy which still exists in the element, which breaks into atom and increases power every second combination with electron magnetic.
Where did the energy to produce the big bang come from? Years of research by so many intelligent scientists to begin to understand complex "rules", which just happened? Is it impossible that this unfathomable source of energy was unfathomably intelligent to formulate these precise formulas that forms these excellently precise orchistrations that make all this, including us, possible?
35:30 When your hand "touches" the table it isn't only the repulsive forces that should be considered. it paints an isolated view of objects, an by extension beings, which isn't fair considering the following. An electron isn't personal to it's atom in all the electronics around the world electrons are exhibiting this attribute as electricity moving through screens, wifi antenna, microwaves etc must not become "home sick", wanting to return to it's "original" atom. And as such when one's hand approaches the table electrons may move and swap between yourself and the table, then in the convention of language you lose and gain electrons yet your hand is still 100% yours although parts where left behind and parts where accumulated. So I feel that the idea that we are all repulsive never really touching spheres in space neglects how these spheres may breach the boundaries of words, and mingle in such a way that nothing in existence is safe from reacting with something in existence, a very connected omni like property. Quite the opposite of the isolated view. Admittedly the brain is late to the party we are interpreting the foundations with which the brain thinks, the laws of the neurons and their electrons on the quantum scale precede the conscious mind. Therefore the foundation, truth, is the constant and interpretation, the forms that paint our reality within the personal mind, are the variables.
As a child I was not allowed to study physics, it was a case of ‘only study what you’ve already scored highly on’ rather than subjects that excited me - without physics I just didn’t get any sense out of chemistry either (maybe it was just bad teaching, who knows now?) but, at a couple of weeks off 70 years old I’m still fascinated and learning all I can. As a child I remember clinging to the saddle of an out of control, galloping horse and another time being chased by a dog and gamekeeper through the whipping twigs of a forest and later laughing out loud and shedding tears of delight at the birth of my sons and, you know, watching this video delivered up bits of all that rolled into one. Thank you so very much, will have to watch this again and again. Absolutely knackered now 😄
Èèèèèèè😅
You must have gone to school in the USA, that's their wicked way of "Dumbing the kids down".
The truth about this whacky "CLICK BAIT" programme is that the power necessary is Electricity, as the whole Universe & everything in it runs on electricity flowing in Plasma. You only have to ask the correct branch of Science. The Institute for Electricity (IEEE), to get at the known proven facts. Astronomers & Physicists have NO qualifications in "Electrical Behaviour" so are literally living in the dark on this one !!!
Thank you so much. It's truly inspiring to hear how, even after all these years, your curiosity and passion for learning, especially in physics, remain undiminished. Your enthusiasm is a reminder that learning knows no age. Happy birthday! 😊
That is the good thing as an adult you have access to so much more on youtube and other on line science
Once you open this door you can't get enough. Astrophysicists are just curious minds like us. They are just much better at math.lol. once I started gobbling these theories up saw that my own simple mind had similar thoughts. And all of the science still leans heavily on theory when applied to the universe. The greatest minds still don't know the answers. And most likely never will.
I've definitely not had any intoxicating substances to enhance my viewing pleasure of this mind bending video in any way shape or form.
Hopefully this is a compliment 😄
@@bigscientificquestions 10/10. Loved it.
@@bigscientificquestionsIt's more of a complement.
I think Tesla Time Theory has application to inter dimension vibration packets of Quantum Energy
Yep me too pinky promise
I really like this. These fundamental concepts are not often discussed deeply like this at one shot. Bravo. Well organized.
Thank you so much😊
The repulsive force of 2 protons in a nucleus is 20lbs. That's unbelievable. And the strong force is a hundred times stronger!!! That certainly helps bring into perspective the type of energy bound up in atoms. That is probably the most profound piece of information I've acquired in years!!
@@UnitSe7en I actually meant the strong force. I don't know how that came out as it did.
Only about 4 to 6 percent of the fissionable material in a nuclear bomb reacts. The other ~95% gets vaporized without contributing to the reaction.
20 lbs is unbelievable. And also untrue. It's closer to 1 millionth of a Newton. Still impressing, but nowhere close to 20 lbs
Thank you! I love learning stuff like this!
@@jdlechThat's why modern atomic bombs are always two fases, the first is fission to create enough heat to trigger a fusion reaction which is the true powerhouse of the bomb and doesn't have a theoretical limit
This video gives a description of particles that seems to be relatively coherent, logical and easy to understand. Even though I got my atomic physics education a LONG TIME AGO (60 yrs), it was recent enough for me to see how this newer & more complex system features blends and extends beyond what I remember of my past atomic theory. I think this presentation is one of the VERY BEST I've listened to. KUDOS! You've done a wonderful job to make a text that even an 85 yo brain can digest! THANK YOU SIRS!
I'm glad to hear that the video provided a clear and understandable explanation of particle physics, and that it effectively built upon and expanded your knowledge from your atomic physics education. It's wonderful that it resonated with you, proving to be accessible and engaging even years after your formal studies. Your appreciation for the effort put into making complex scientific concepts digestible is heartening. Thank you for your kind words! 😊
I agree with you and your old timey brain is on point
I hope that one day (soon) more people will truly understand what an absolute privilege it is to be alive and to be part of our magical and wonderful universe...our planet would be a much better place (jmho). When I was a child my physics teacher told me that all the atoms in my body came from different stars and I was "hooked on" our amazing universe. I thank you for this informative, fun, and beautiful upload...and I hope that our universe is kind to you all 🌎☮
Yep, the creator did the impossible, I'm thankful to the creator 😊
@@brendansherlock6442 yeah after reading a well thought out comment I figured there would be some dimwitted religious nonsense replying to it. Thanks for not disappointing, also your favorite fanfic claims your creator made humans from dirt with magic.
Yup. Religion is a dangerous thing.
@@DistinctiveBlendas a secular materialist, You do know that... Materialistic scientists do Not know the source of human Consciousness and Life -- living organisms.
The Limitations of Materialism.
@@steveflorida5849 wait wait are you telling me science doesn't understand everything?!?! Well I'm now convinced I should believe a sky fairy made everything with magic...
Fantastic explanation at a good pace. Very helpful to get clarity on so many things in one go, at atomic level
Thank you! Delighted it made things clear for you 😊
The electrons circling around the nucleos 24/7 Wow! That requires a lots of energy.
The answer is that a high energy moving electron was captured by a nucleus when it reached its periphery and since that time electrons are continuously revolving around the nucleus and thus leads to the formation of atoms 🌞
WOW! these documentaries are the most thoroughly detailed videos ever and I have been watching these kind of documentaries for almost 40 years!
Thank you! It's an honor to hear that from such an experienced viewer. We appreciate your feedback! 😊
UA-cam is full of incredible videos packed with far more detailed information than this video includes.
40 secs in and you have already given me existential crisis
Im obsessed with this subject, and this hit a perfect depth and pace. Wonderful
Thank you very much for your wonderful comment 😊
Every time I watch videos about physics I’m reminded why I love Chemistry so much. Physics is like space magic. It’s a miracle the universe exists.
What about the miracle of Life, being that Life is Not inherent in mechanistic atoms?
Quite a comprehensive overview from fundamental particles to the Cosmo into our very own existence and after life. More importantly, to me that is, I'm glued to the screen and surprisingly understand. Great job and keep up the good work. From Hong Kong
Thank you so much! It's heartening to know our content resonated with you. Your support means the world! Greetings to Hong Kong! 😊
@@bigscientificquestions I have listened to the first 6 minutes many times and I'm still not understanding how the question you started with "Where do electrons get the energy to spin around an atom's nucleus?". I think you say "because of the principles of quantum mechanics, the electron can never reach the nucleus, becoming perpetually stuck in orbit." But I'd like a more complete answer. You don't need to answer this. Look at my reply to this question.
I asked ChatGPT and here is the answer
Here's how it works:
Absorption: When an electron absorbs energy, it temporarily moves to a higher energy level. This energy can come from various sources, such as photons of specific frequencies (which correspond to the energy difference between the initial and final energy levels) or external electric fields.
Emission: When the electron returns to a lower energy level, it emits energy in the form of a photon. This emitted photon carries away the energy difference between the two energy levels. The energy is released into the surroundings, which can include the surrounding space or other particles in the atom.
So, while electrons can change energy levels and emit or absorb energy, the total energy within a closed system is conserved. Energy exchanges within a closed system, in discrete, quantized steps, and the total energy of the system remains constant according to the principle of conservation of energy. For a more detailed answer you can see the entire chat at chat.openai.com/share/d3f7a0d1-57f6-418d-bb0d-010d48e7a9b9
@@BobCampbell530I'm only 5½ minutes into this, and it seems that the atom has been described as a perpetual motion machine! I don't think the question of where atoms get their energy was answered at all, at least not at the grassroots level. It's an "emperor's new clothes" answer, and you're just supposed to accept that it's due to the characteristics of their quantum nature. Might as well just say: "Because, that's why", or "That's just the way it is". But I will soldier on, to see if the rest of the video gets to the point, or drowns out the question in a torrent of hypothetical gobbledygook. I remain optimistic! Onwards!
I@@F8Tributo I can't seem to find the answer to my own question that I posted later, but the energy comes from photons OUTSIDE of the atoms. I don't think that was made very clear in the article, but I found my answer through ChatGPT.
After watching this fantastic video end to end, I am a bit more knowledgeable, though I admit, I have to watch this for atleast a few more times to get more understanding. As I watched this hour long video, few doubts arose but since I failed to pause and jot down these, I will pen down my doubts after I watch a second or third time. Brilliant work, soothing voice and simple explanation to a complexity which mankind has yet to grasp.
Thank you so much for your wonderful comment 😊
Excellent video, in one hour you described most of physics, most comprehensive video I saw until now…. I think that from any sentence in this video someone can make a one hour video… 😊 really good explanation without so many sentences, brief and brilliant.
Thank you so much for your great comment 😊
@@bigscientificquestions Constructive criticism: lose the background noise!
The subject & your narration of it is great. The addition of distracting & annoying music ruined the vid for me, I didn't get past a couple of minutes.
i l8
narrative' Ill be with you till the end of time'
At 9:04, I always felt as a layperson that this “mystery” makes inflation problematic. But recently I found Alan Guth explaining it matter of factly, not as a “mystery” at all. The “energy” that drove this is initiated as a typical fluctuation in the vacuum, due to NEGATIVE PRESSURE DENSITY. This situation is implied to be happening constantly and randomly….meaning outside of our bubble it is happening all over the place (a version of multiverse better thought of multi bubble of the cosmos in general). The bubble doubles in size about 100 times before an inevitable phase transition occurs that stops the “inflationary period of time” (and thus any further inflation events in our own bubble). The phase transition is important to understand because it book ends the concept of start and stop, and can eventually be observed (in theory). So if you buy the inflation concept at all, NO it is not a mysterious force that drove the expansion then stopped. It is negative pressure density due to quantum chaos of the vacuum and its virtual particle situation (which is real and verified in experiments).
And how DO they get the caramel into a Cadbury chocolate bar?!?!
Thank you, I really think I learned something, ...I think. Highly interesting and informative. Now, I'll just have to give myself time to ponder these thoughts and give my molecules time to calm down and return to vibrating harmonically again, as they are in a very excited state right now. Great stuff!
Thank you so much for your thoughtful comment! It's wonderful to hear that you found the information exciting and thought-provoking. It's like our minds are a symphony of ideas, and sometimes they need a moment to find their harmonious rhythm once again. 😊
"...a symphony of ideas...", I like the image. Thanks again. I look forward to more of the same in the future. Basically, we are all children staring up at the night sky.@@bigscientificquestions
ua-cam.com/channels/DmikjslWwIlxJDpiimuQ3w.html This is false information! No uman as ever seen a point in space. Some irratnal humas claimed to see a point wen they see a picture of a point.
😅
I use this video to meditate.
every question has one answer
because the mitochondira is powerhouse of the cell
This is a fantastic video that makes everything crystal clear to any atomic scientist.
or past wannabe. lol
Is a foton eternal?? Could you please answer that question...thank s
The amount of ads in this video is borderline criminal. People are trying to watch this while falling asleep only to have their ears wrecked every 3 minutes. Fk this
I am a Mechanical engineer. This video is really interesting. Can we compare human body with universe? Can we see the bigbang with our biological body? Moreover Are we the only intelligent being in the universe? 13:15
I don't know
The macro mirrors the micro. All of life has intelligence. It's just different levels. Humans are just a bunch of atoms after all. Does every cell in your body have intelligence, or just some?
it depends on how you define intelligence.. and being.. and universe..
@@shiva.chennai maybe we can.. but first you have to define what you want to measure.. and that would only be a scale of intelligence based on the definition you have chosen..
Imho, to answer that requires knowing who/what we really are and where we actually are…..🤔🎼🤙
I agree with the previous comment. Having music with the talking is rather distracting and grating. Gave me a headache. Loved it otherwise.
No , it is good and add good atmosphere and give Enthusiasm and fun
No is good and add good atmosphere
I somewhat agree but I think that if the music was softer, it would be okay. What I didn't like was the monotonous voice of this AI presentation
The music has discordant notes not conducive to learning. Disallusionment and a hopeless passing of time.
Its much like a new science book where they hit you hard at first to weed out those that arent willing to sacrifice discomfort for learning the basics no matter what.
The notes are irritating and eventually harmful, prompting cortisol, which should increase catecholamines, much like caffeine.
I would bet its cancer causing if played loud enough.
Then, theres the pressure. " I better get this the first time around or suffer a curious sort of monotany."
Scientists are still exploring the vast universe but the mind and universe are two mystery that's beyond the grasp of humans that's aly😊😊😊😊🎉
We were not born from the big bang. We are the big bang.
For me, the biggest question no-one is discussing is "Exactly what is electric charge? and how does an electron get exactly -1 and the u type quarks get +2/3 charge and d type get -1/3 charge? And the anti electron gets +1 charge and the anti-quarks get -2/3 or +1/3."
So what IS electric charge? What single or multiple of "things" confer electric charge on things? Is it the same "thing" for electrons and quarks?
I think i understand magnetism IF electric charge is given.
Best one for me is why things are solid when atoms are mostly empty. I never thought to ask this and the answer was brilliant
10 ^5
It really gets you thinking about the beginning of the universe. We started as a ball or raw energy, due to fluctuations its started to combine it kept getting more and more complex and dense until stars were born. When stars die, heavy elements are made, making planets and eventually us. It cant be just a bunch of random events?
Yet, the universe did not collapse in on itself. You're breaking the "rules" if you think the mass of the universe would not collapse in on itself, even 1 million years after the big bang.
....and define the word "theory" for us???
@joeturner9219 ...and God said: let there be light....
And the double slit experiment came into existence....🍻👍
@joeturner9219adorable how you use the words in the bible to PROVE the bible. Here, lemme try. "i am the most handsome man on earth"
me 1:1
Wow, who knew life could be so convenient
When you heat water it boils... do you also call that 'a bunch of random events'? Or put another way causality isn't random.
@@ShortFuseFighting simplistic answers for simplistic minds
First.
Think of standing in the dark, looking out at the universe's galaxies, spinning about each other, around space and time.
Each capable of housing the lives of Humankind.
Now.
Think about standing at a window, looking out at the street people walking. Their minds. Spinning around each other, throughout space and time.
Eachmind capable of housing the concepts of the entire universe.
It's like multiple unverses, housing multiple universes,, inside of what may be. more multiple universes.
Don't even get me started on cells and molecules, atoms, electrons and particles so infinitely small we cannot see them any better than we can the insides of a blackhole.
I just can’t get enough of this stuff!
Studying such a small object and observing it’s brilliance is fascinating.
I have to listen to this several more times. I love it. You have opened a world of marvelous curious knowledge i would have never know if wasnt for this video as my world revolves around a different science. I am so thankful for this knowledge. I want more of this trivia, and explanations. LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you so much for your wonderful comment 😊
Please do more long format videos!
This is fascinating and full of intriguing questions. I enjoyed that, my atoms are well and truly jiggled now 😊
Glad you enjoyed it, thanks a lot for your great comment 😊
my research and study indicate that electrons and all subatomic particles are powered directly by the dirac sea of infinite energy, which is powered directly by the energy that is the material universe. i realize there are highly complex ways to say this but i am stating this in the simplest terms and least words possible. one gentleman explained to me that it would take him four years to explain where an electron gets its energy to spin.
i have also read this explained as, the zero point field, also called gravity waves, dirac sea, virtual particle flux fields, tachyon waves, cosmic energy, dark energy, dark matter, heaviside component, zero point vacuum fluxuation dynamics, and infinite energy from the vacuum, powers the material universe, and the energy that is the material universe powers the infinite energy from the vacuum.
a perpetual, self maintaining symbiotic system.
4:47 Even the very first explanation is wrong, the energy on an electron is not negativ, its charge is.
Keep working you will be the next Big youtuber.🎉
Good luck 🤞🤞😊👍
Thank you very much for your wonderful comment and good wishes 🙏😊
The strong force adds about 1000 times the mass of the three quarks making up the protons and neutrons. This is probably due to the high energy density of the gluons being exchanged by the quarks.
It's just difficult to explain. That's also how I understand it, but then it'd mean gluons have mass or otherwise if they are massless they vibrate (move) with a speed of light?
@@yanair2091according to the standard model they do move with the speed of light all massless particles have to move with the speed of light. 99% of the mass of the proton (and neutron) comes from kinetic energy of particles inside them. Inside of the nucleon is a big bubbly soup of gluons constantly exchanging color charge and particles popping up into existence and then annihilating.
Oh bravo. We’re all so proud of you.
This video was amazing!!! I thoroughly enjoyed it, yeah okay the music was a little bit much now and again but its plain to see a lot of work went into it........
Thank you so much for this great comment 😊
One hour of topics that are totally unrelated to the conscious experience... which is all we have.
Why did I have to go through 12 years of schooling when your 1 hour long video would have been sufficient? 😮
❤😊
Capitalism isn't it brother 😂
I admire your intelligence, it is easy to learn(understand) difficult principes, thanx to your gift to make such a great video! Thank you forever. Rare quality standard you just demonstrated here, I hope you continue on, doing even better (if it is even possible:))!
Thank you so much for your fascinating comment. 😊
Same here.
This would be so much better if there was not irritating background music.
Excellent video, but for PhD students, I can't understand or may be I don't have sufficient patience !
21:00 Having two identical atoms in the same state is not only unlikely it is fundamentally impossible under our current understanding of physics except under extremely specific conditions like those that form a BEC. This is what the Pauli Exclusion Principle is telling us that two particles can not exist in the same location in Hibert Space. Since Atoms are made of the Quantum particles this theory is discussing achieving the same quantum states needed to create two identical atoms is impossible. There are Bose Einstein Condensates( BECs) which achieve something along these lines at extremely low energies but when this happens all the particles start to behave as one single unified Wave function, almost like, Quantum Entangling all the Quarks that make up the cloud of Atoms such that they form one unified Wavefunction acting as a single particle.
Wow I’m so high how did I ever think about that, how do particles infinitely spin?! Gotta watch
The best video I've ever seen on these subjects. Fantastic.
Glad you enjoyed it, thank you very much for your great comment 😊
@@bigscientificquestions Is that your voice. I love the cadence.
Tremendous piece of work. I would prefer the cadences of a real spoken voice to create interest (and to better pronounce a few words like 'integer' and 'hadron').
I thought I was the only one. "kilometers slash esss" really does break the sentence.
These videos need to come with ibuprofen
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Universe is made of submicroscopic quantum particles. These particles posses intrinsic motion. As a result everything is moving & spinning.
7:00 The Big Bang doesn't explain the two questions that I think are the most mind boggling questions possible.
1. Was there ever nothing?
2. If there was ever nothing, where did something come from?
Here's one stunning comment for everyone to look at, learn from and hear: Atoms can't evolve!
Isaac Newton full well knew the gravity of the statement and that is exactly why he was a devout Christian man as was Michael Faraday, Leo Tolstoy, Joseph Priestley and all the great minds of past and present knew that there had to be an all-powerful God in order to set things in place. In more recent times even Albert Einstein acknowledged the existence of the Almighty. That God's name is Yahweh God the Father Almighty with his son Jesus Christ at his side.
Brilliant video. Still, one thing I didn’t understand in part I: at 4:40 onwards you say “The total energy of an electron in orbit [=kinetic+potential] is +negative+”, while simultaneously explaining that the attracting force of the positive nucleus must be exactly matched by an opposite force driving the electron onwards in order for the atom as a whole to remain stable.
But it seems to me the latter would imply the total energy mentioned earlier should be +zero+ (in order to keep the whole atom stable). If it is negative instead, wouldn’t that mean the electon would require a constant stream of additional energy to keep orbiting? Or put more generally: how can matter (even as tiny as an electron) have permanent negative energy?
I’m assuming I’m either completely misunderstanding or missing something, but can someone please point out to me the error in my thinking?
Actually the electrostatic potential energy of a stationary electron at the infinite distance from the nucleus is taken as zero and as the electron approaches towards the nucleus, the electrostatic attraction is in the same direction as the motion, which means the potential energy of the electron starts to decrease so lesser than zero that make it negative.
Now, if the electron just “fell” straight in toward the nucleus, it would gain kinetic energy and the total energy (potential plus kinetic) would stay zero. But some of that kinetic energy gets lost to photons emitted by the atom as the electron drops into lower and lower orbitals and its total energy becomes negative.
The electron also has kinetic energy. Kinetic energy can never be negative (because in K.E expression we have squared of velocity which is always positive) and it is smaller in magnitude than the potential energy.
Source: Byju
See force and energy is a different thing
What the above reply is is absolutely correct and needs no more explanation
@@amitshukla6555rightly referred
Electrons don’t orbit either
Great video though I still struggle with the Big Bang since no one can explain where all the particles came from...hopefully one day we'll work it out
Thank you 😊
Read about inflation theory and big bang.
Yeah, im too, not just the particles but where the energy came from??? Was it a creator who made all these THINGS? BTW, I’m not religious person, just can’t understand the Big Bang theory .
The universe being similar to an atoms size is something I always wondered. Or do sub atomic particles have near infinite amounts of space and time inside or near them? We know time and space can bend and stretch but no one knows to what limits, if there are any limits.
There is no such thing as Time.......There is only the Now
@@KartizaK Except when I read your comment you had written it 3 hours ago!
lol 3 hours on planet earth. but from the moon it was 6 hours ago ;-)@@carlopolli3995
@KartizaK Your a clown right now😂
That is redculous. ua-cam.com/channels/DmikjslWwIlxJDpiimuQ3w.html
Not the easiest, but certainly one of the most rewarding videos I've seen.
The fact that people have worked this out is quite remarkable. However I think the most fundamental questions will never be answered. T=1 will forever elude us.
I dream one day it will be known. It’s possible…
@@Pebeoblue It's fun looking anyway.
this video looks amazing
Thank you so much 😊
This video is incredible! I'm loving every second. I do have a question. If information transfer within the universe is limited to the speed of light, where does quantum entanglement fit within this limit? As I understand it does transmit information at speeds not limited by the speed of light. I will be looking forward to a reply from someone far better informed on this than me.
Quantum entanglement does not transmit information. That is a very common misconception.
Thank you so much 😊
This question was also the reason for Einstein's objection to quantum entanglement, you can watch this video about how Einstein was proved wrong: ua-cam.com/video/zcW_m36bVVQ/v-deo.html
Oh Albert. He even answers questions not yet asked…
The music in the background is working my last gluon.
Theories oh theories
Excellent video
Glad you liked it 😊
Love the illustrations. They are incredible.
Thank you so much 😊
with all the science in the world is still began with with a miracle
Can someone explain to me why videos like this imply or state the old theory is wrong, then spend an hour explaining the wrong theory, after which they spend 30 seconds stating the previous hour was debunked by some find?
Brilliant!! The most engaging hour I have ever spent watching YT. Deep gratitude for your dedication ❤ aroha nui from New Zealand (sub'd)
Thank you very much, aroha nui to New Zealand ❤️ 😊
Wonderful!
Many thanks! 😊
@@bigscientificquestions Please!😉
A good video. The standard model tells us what nature does but not why. I hope that as particle accelerators advance, we'll get a better handle on what the fabric of space is made of.
Thank you 😊
We already know what the fabric of space is made of. Everything in the universe is compromised of energy vibrating or oscillating at different frequencies.
@@xAllCatsAreBeautiful1312x I believe the fabric of space is a field of energy as well. Perhaps one day we'll be able to observe it's composure. I believe that will be what makes us capable of true space travel.
The awe of our universe at the atomic level with music to enhance the experience.
A Scientific- Artistic Masterpiece creating awe with understanding.
Amazing what the human imagination can create.
From myths of gods to myths of the beginning of the universe.
We create the symbols that represent sounds, apply meaning and definition to the sounds, and then apply that imagination to the universe’s make up.
The reality we exist in isn’t enough for us.
very interesting , i could though point to the Bose Einstein temperature about the atom properties on absolute zero ,also it is fascinating how nature made the neutron ,if you leave it alone or it doesnt fit it decays ,but if you put it in a symmetrical or balanced atom or a neutron star it doesnt break and usually we get lots of energy when things shrink or break
BREAK. BRAKE IS STOPPING A CAR. SHOULD BE EMBARRASSING FOR YOU.
@@CrakenFlux Break.* Usually sentences don't have all letters capital. Embarrasing.
@@CrakenFlux thanks for the note ,i ll correct it , ok break like in 2 pieces or more right but as a matter of fact if 2 pieces or more will brake on each other they will still release energy and possibly break :p was a bit funny though
@@CrakenFluxnobody is embarrassed about spell correct. You feel shame over spelling correct😂
One of the best videos of this kind ive seen
Many thanks for your great comment 😊
... of this kind ... ? ... or ... of the 3rd kind ... ?
@@korundum4992 of this kind....close though
God bless for the great video's 🙏❤️
The cause of electron spin is the flow of vacuum free energy density. The electron splits the thin lepton structure of the vacuum with a charge, the electron acquires energy in the quantum field of the vacuum, energy is exchanged, spin and magneton appear. I repeat, the electron acquires an energy level in vacuum, is at its energy level of vacuum due to the splitting of the vacuum fine structure, entering into the structure of fluctuations.
Good video very comprehensive and I backed it up in several spots to listen to the concepts over a couple of times and will save the video and watch it again it is very informative and you have done a very good job in the format that you presented the subject, three cheers to you and anyone else that participated in the creation of this documentary
Fantastic journey with the ancestors. I can see an amazing Yoga Intention with this in mind. 🙏🏼
Absolutely!! 😊
Gay gay gay.
mf answering my 3am thought
They do not spin
Made it to thirty mins, and then lost the ability to keep up.... I need to learn more of the basics on sub atomics particles I think.... this is answering questions I would not have the knowledge to ask in the first place...
will save and come back when I am wiser (and more sober) ;p
I can't wait return to be just small atoms and travel free , no conscious , no thoughts , just fly so far , free
Perhaps the problem is in we’re examining a reaction like it is a state, the observation process must be begun with/within the observer. The observer directly affects the observed.❤❤❤
Because there is a connection between the observation and that which is being observed
@@CMVMicthat has not been proven yet
@@PandaCheeks ofcourse it has. Light from objects are intercepted by your eye
I love it great documentary🤔
Thank you very much 😊
There's something very assertive and resolute in the manner in which this narrator speaks that's utterly hypnotic and captivating to me. It takes me to a full trance state. 😅
👍
Thank you!
Your are welcome 😊
Your description of electrons dancing according to the amount of light energy they receive seems analogous to light energy being a source of nutrition for hungry electrons that consume the light. Reality is too strange to conceive and we know too little to form a coherent picture, that is my experience. Without light, could electrons still dance?
What you are made of is not atoms, mercy be with you do not fashion you can know through the mind.
Great video! It has answered quite a view questions i have ever had. Thanks!
Glad it was helpful, many thanks for your great comment 😊
@@bigscientificquestions 9 out of 10 of your animations show wholly inappropriate (macro scale) interactions that do not properly illustrate the counter-intuitive quantum realm. I cannot agree with other comments by your fan-base that say this is the best animation possible. Good effort but you perpetuate the ideas that we can intuit this stuff whereas it is actually not at all like the world we are familiar with.
@@simonmasters3295 i agree. most of the time only what is said is valid, not the video with it.
GOD is amazing. The Great Bang was a result of God's spoken word... And God said, let there be.........
Here's one stunning comment for everyone to look at, learn from and hear: Atoms can't evolve!
Isaac Newton full well knew the gravity of the statement and that is exactly why he was a devout Christian man as was Michael Faraday, Leo Tolstoy, Joseph Priestley and all the great minds of past and present knew that there had to be an all-powerful God in order to set things in place. In more recent times even Albert Einstein acknowledged the existence of the Almighty. That God's name is Yahweh God the Father Almighty with his son Jesus Christ at his side.
Amen, 🙏
Light... and he saw that it was good.
"God said" is an expression just to relate to the human we are. That Almighty never spoke to anyone and does not have the characteristics the bible attributes to IT! IT is not a HE and certainly has no name. Yahweh is just a megalomaniac, a powerful being who used humanity ignorance of things to establish himself as a ruler. Period
God is an intellectually ridiculous myth.
How can this video has no likes?
On my screen it has 24,000 likes
Oh,may be it was any bug at that time
Good explanation, this is the type of videos that you dont want to finish
Thank you so much 😊
Excellent.... thanks 🙏.
Sorry to say that when the woman giving birth after birth the new born baby cannot go back in to the womb again this is called the power of God like that about the numbers in neumaralagi 1= A ,2=B ,3=C, 4,=D, 5=E up to 26,=Z and here 26 is not called BF as this to say that about 10 means 25s as 55 and 12 is 26 as 66 like that 2+5=7 and 2+6=8 .In this after 25 the next number is 26 but when we take these numbers as 10 and 12 and where is the number 11 so the secret is 10= 1 as 1+0=1 , 1+1=2, 1+2=3 called 1,2,3 or A B C . And about 10 and 12 called 10 J and 12 L .JL means water in Indian language JAL and if we take 11 that 10 11 12 J AA L means NET in the Indian language and 5+5 is EE and 12 is L here EEL means fish here to tell where is water there will be fish ,net ,ship and in the ship Novah built 3 storee to know these things see the image of the universe in this by measuring and watching we get all the answers And the power of God as in the Bible Daniel 7 chap time times and half time and Solomon built the steps 5, 6 7 and about many secrets we are seeing but not abcerving and this 2025 2926 as 2+5=7 and 2+6=8 here the 7 is Jesus place and 8 is Jehovah place and there is no time the given. time is over and also about 5 cartons and 6 cartons both length 30 width 4 and make 5 and 6 cartons together or stich then it will be 11 cartons as 11x4= 44 and 30 x 11=330 these are the steps to go to 7th place as 2023 and 2024 as 2+3 =5 and 2+4=6 so wait and watch and 23 24 is Mene mene and 10 11 12 is T K L and this is the Judgement days and see the pictures Thankyou..
photos.app.goo.gl/X1EyHhhsmcbzVGbu9
Thank you for your encouraging feedback. 😊
Love this one . Vibes
Amazingly this confirms Buddhism is a great philosophy and agrees 100% with Abhidhamma, which is the science and logics of Buddhism. Thank you very much for this great insight 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏and for me having studied Abhidhamma made me to comprehend and bridge knowledge between modern science and Buddhism.
You’re welcome ☺️
Here's one stunning comment for everyone to look at, learn from and hear: Atoms can't evolve!
Isaac Newton full well knew the gravity of the statement and that is exactly why he was a devout Christian man as was Michael Faraday, Leo Tolstoy, Joseph Priestley and all the great minds of past and present knew that there had to be an all-powerful God in order to set things in place. In more recent times even Albert Einstein acknowledged the existence of the Almighty. That God's name is Yahweh God the Father Almighty with his son Jesus Christ at his side.
@@gdurant can you command mountains to move?
Newton gravity equation is valid started from electrons to orbit atom's nucleus like planets orbitting the star...🙏🙏
Do atoms have atom apples? That's a question that has never been answered.
Too much too quickly…
Skill issue
If only it was in hindi
When we die, atoms in our bodies generally disintegrate into the universe, or specifically, into the earth, where we came from. Life holds these atoms in their places. Without life, atoms would drift into space and may form part of other matters, living or non-living. It is really a cycle. The universe is constant. Part of it may die and disintegrate but it would eventually return to the same universe in some form or another.
I did not understand a word.
I must have listened over 100 lectures on quantum physics.
You’re not alone, this sounds like a lot of unproven theory to me!
atom is the force of energy which still exists in the element, which breaks into atom and increases power every second combination with electron magnetic.
Where did the energy to produce the big bang come from? Years of research by so many intelligent scientists to begin to understand complex "rules", which just happened? Is it impossible that this unfathomable source of energy was unfathomably intelligent to formulate these precise formulas that forms these excellently precise orchistrations that make all this, including us, possible?
While bein packed with facts, the music loop combined with the robot narration make this tough to endure for an entire hour.
So, from where do electrons get their energy??
Well I think the video is perfect. Especially the background audio adding an immersion sensation.
35:30 When your hand "touches" the table it isn't only the repulsive forces that should be considered. it paints an isolated view of objects, an by extension beings, which isn't fair considering the following.
An electron isn't personal to it's atom in all the electronics around the world electrons are exhibiting this attribute as electricity moving through screens, wifi antenna, microwaves etc must not become "home sick", wanting to return to it's "original" atom. And as such when one's hand approaches the table electrons may move and swap between yourself and the table, then in the convention of language you lose and gain electrons yet your hand is still 100% yours although parts where left behind and parts where accumulated.
So I feel that the idea that we are all repulsive never really touching spheres in space neglects how these spheres may breach the boundaries of words, and mingle in such a way that nothing in existence is safe from reacting with something in existence, a very connected omni like property. Quite the opposite of the isolated view.
Admittedly the brain is late to the party we are interpreting the foundations with which the brain thinks, the laws of the neurons and their electrons on the quantum scale precede the conscious mind. Therefore the foundation, truth, is the constant and interpretation, the forms that paint our reality within the personal mind, are the variables.
You've read too many books if you listened to the intro and had an answer you're confident is correct to all questions posed.
What blows your mind is that the movement caused by the strong force in the nucleus creates most of the mass.!