What is a Force & Types of Forces in Physics? - Gravity, Normal Force, Contact Forces - [1-5-1]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 262

  • @katayoonkalaeirad2238
    @katayoonkalaeirad2238 Рік тому +15

    I can NOT express how thankful I am for these videos. No teacher has ever explained these topics so in depth. Thank you so very much 🙏🏼💚🦕

  • @sgtbilko2950
    @sgtbilko2950 2 роки тому +14

    Went back to college at 39... your videos are really helping me

  • @TeslaExplorer
    @TeslaExplorer 2 роки тому +10

    Reminds me of my past Cal3 professor. So much passion in his explanations.

  • @raymondallenjhangiani7670
    @raymondallenjhangiani7670 2 роки тому +10

    Truly a wonderful teacher ! God bless you sir 🙏

  • @alphenex8974
    @alphenex8974 2 роки тому +6

    As a turk, for some reason english lessons are way easier to remember and learn.. I love this channel.

  • @MomentBlanket
    @MomentBlanket 11 місяців тому +3

    May the lord continue blessing you for the great work u are doing sir.

  • @nasrullahturke4480
    @nasrullahturke4480 2 роки тому +4

    This truly was one of the concept I was concerned with. With so many different force formula and it's types it is one of the confused concept to many students.

  • @jimcampbell1139
    @jimcampbell1139 2 роки тому +2

    My friend. I took my last class on trig some 50 years ago night school. Your classes have caused me some problems. This class was super informative. At 80 yrs. I am not as rapid mentally but you are very through and it brings tighter things from your earlier classes. Many many thanks.

  • @antoinelavoisier9784
    @antoinelavoisier9784 Рік тому

    This gentleman is outstanding. It is rare for someone with such deep ability to also be able to perceive and correct the stumbling points of the novice.

  • @rajendtt
    @rajendtt Місяць тому

    Super sir. I'm also a professor but got confused about the force. Now your beautiful explanation cleared all my doubts. Thank u so much.

  • @wilkyclergeot9416
    @wilkyclergeot9416 2 роки тому +24

    " You're an incredible teacher thank you so much"

    • @MathAndScience
      @MathAndScience  2 роки тому +6

      Welcome!

    • @ufs4.1
      @ufs4.1 2 роки тому +3

      I ᴀᴍ ɪɴᴅɪᴀɴ

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 2 роки тому

      @@MathAndScience Consider what is E=MC2. c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Consider what is THE EARTH/ground. Consider what is E=MC2. Now, consider what is THE EYE; AND consider what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. SO, consider what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/as SPACE; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE; AS WHAT IS E=MC2 CLEARLY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, notice what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. Now, consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun ON BALANCE !! They are the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! CONSIDER WHAT IS E=MC2 ON BALANCE. Gravity is an interaction that cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE !!! Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE !!! c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! Think. What is E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent. What is THE EARTH/ground is fully consistent with/as (AND IT IS BALANCED WITH/AS) what is E=MC2 (ON/IN BALANCE). BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE), AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Again, ON BALANCE, consider what is the BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of/as SPACE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! CLEARLY, I have mathematically proven and explained what is the fourth dimension. Magnificent.
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 2 роки тому

      @@MathAndScience TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Gravity is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE.
      Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY explains and proves the fourth dimension. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE !!!! Indeed, E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Notice the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE, AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. INDEED, WHAT IS E=MC2 is dimensionally consistent; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. “Mass”/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Accordingly, ON BALANCE, what are OBJECTS may fall at the SAME RATE. Consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun AND what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE. They are the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE).
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio

    • @RockySinghaniyaRocky
      @RockySinghaniyaRocky Рік тому

      ​@@ufs4.1me too😊

  • @tooeric5
    @tooeric5 Рік тому +1

    Of All Your Lectures you are one of the Excellent lecturer.
    Thank you I love because they really get to my understanding.

  • @jerrytheinsider
    @jerrytheinsider Рік тому

    Awesome

  • @marthaatim-K50
    @marthaatim-K50 3 місяці тому

    Am so blessed to be part of your classes,😊 physics has been a mystery to me but am seeing change,here in uganda 🎉🎉

  • @alieumansaray6436
    @alieumansaray6436 2 роки тому +1

    What an excellent teacher/lecturer

  • @richardserlin1317
    @richardserlin1317 3 місяці тому

    I think a good way to put this, where the Newton forces don’t add up to the same number on both sides of the equation, is that if you walk a diagonal line to get from Pointe a to B, this will take less time and energy than walking a horizontal line plus a vertical line, But you do end up at the exact same place. And that is what the vector equation is saying, that you end up at the same exact point, even though the amount of energy it takes to get there is different.

  • @AchenyuBkPlayArt-ko4yl
    @AchenyuBkPlayArt-ko4yl 3 місяці тому

    Sir you are that someone that can cause the love for the subject physics

  • @scitus5222
    @scitus5222 2 роки тому +8

    Your videos are amazing.
    Love it 💕❤️

  • @kareemsalessi
    @kareemsalessi 6 місяців тому

    52:00 Rockets 🚀 Question:: What is a minimum necessary TWR for a vertical rocket launch which burns at least one second???

  • @lenorareedbrinson1181
    @lenorareedbrinson1181 2 роки тому +2

    Mr. Jason, you are an amazing Instructor. I appreciate your knowledge ability that YOU offer me. I am trying to teach myself through your lessons. I don't understand how You got the angle of 36.9. I have no calculator. I do my work manually. Please explain. I will review trigonometry. Thank You. Lenora

  • @morriswahba173
    @morriswahba173 9 місяців тому

    This is the way how you teach students thank you

  • @dralpharyderistheone
    @dralpharyderistheone 3 місяці тому

    Greetings from Hong Kong. Your teaching is so great and helpful.

  • @simpleman283
    @simpleman283 2 роки тому

    When I first saw the Sine & Cosine video I had the same question. I never said anything because I was only interested in sin & cos, but just thinking about it, I realised how it works. You know they are still making comments on that video arguing first without ever taking some time to think about it. O yea, & the never ending comments about the stick man.
    I love learning this stuff & you teach it so well. Thank you.
    I hope you have a great weekend

    • @MathAndScience
      @MathAndScience  2 роки тому +2

      Thanks so much. Yeah I have answered that question dozens of times over on that video :). It’s ok though - I want to know the confusing bits so I can clear them up!

  • @davidogbija5806
    @davidogbija5806 2 роки тому +1

    Nice learning from a great and wonderful teacher like you many many thanks 🙏

  • @hitendragadhavi6701
    @hitendragadhavi6701 Місяць тому

    Sir, wonderfulley intersting way of teaching ❤

  • @goodphone156
    @goodphone156 2 роки тому +1

    If two vettors they act one horizontal and one vertical with the same force of 4N what is its angle of moviment? Or there is no angle of moviment because the two forces cancel each other out , because they are in a point of equilubrium.

    • @hemrajue3434
      @hemrajue3434 2 роки тому +1

      If we use triangular law of addition, resultant force is going to be √4^2+4^2=√32=4√2 and angle 45°.

  • @niyonkuruidrissa2346
    @niyonkuruidrissa2346 2 роки тому +1

    So basic sir 10x and much respect ❤️❤️❤️

  • @christ2551
    @christ2551 5 місяців тому

    You are god sent Mr. Gibson. They pay these athletes ridiculous 💰 when they really should be paying awesome teachers like yourself those money.

  • @josphat.Karanja
    @josphat.Karanja Рік тому

    🤓🤓🤓❤❤❤❤... My favorite PHYSICS ❤❤❤ ... You are a great teacher, love all the lessons

  • @Diego-rb2vt
    @Diego-rb2vt 9 місяців тому

    Thank you professor! What class 💯 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

  • @Robbie-z9e
    @Robbie-z9e 5 місяців тому

    Thanks so very much for this video. It's like you've removed a clog in my brain. God Bless.

  • @dmpadher737
    @dmpadher737 Рік тому

    Sir - Very nice …
    A small query -> “ If I throw a ball in space with force ‘F’ , the will move in space continuously. Will the ball will have same acceleration throughout its journey? Or same velocity throughout journey ( means Zero force ) ?

  • @munyuconeliusgodblessupyou176

    You are so unique in your perfect explanation 🤝🤝✍️✍️✍️🎇🎇🎇

  • @Laura-ho4he
    @Laura-ho4he 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing content, thank you sir

  • @alphanetworkkenya1734
    @alphanetworkkenya1734 Рік тому

    Amazing teacher, thank you🎉

  • @anissbenthami
    @anissbenthami Рік тому

    In your example where you apply force to the baseball in space in order to cause motion, can you move an asteroid in the same exact way as a baseball in this context or will it be different?

  • @AdmiringBoombox-he7sl
    @AdmiringBoombox-he7sl 7 місяців тому

    I like the way you teach

  • @marthachristyamadi25
    @marthachristyamadi25 3 місяці тому

    Good job!

  • @Code8564
    @Code8564 8 місяців тому

    Great explanation ❤

  • @ethan_jenn
    @ethan_jenn Рік тому

    6:34, what about gravitational force ? does it not maintain the motion ?

    • @Mike-ks6qu
      @Mike-ks6qu 21 день тому

      Earth's forward momentum (inertia) keeps it in a stable path and therefore acts as a balancing force. The sun's gravity is the centripetal force that keeps the earth in an eliptical orbit, and the earth's angular momentum maintains this balance of forces and keeps us in a stable orbit.

  • @ursulagwozdz1955
    @ursulagwozdz1955 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much for this great lecture.

  • @tresajessygeorge210
    @tresajessygeorge210 7 місяців тому

    THANK YOU... SIR...!!!

  • @bonnietube6616
    @bonnietube6616 Рік тому +1

    really I appreciate you your work
    your work

  • @gildalartey-sr8iy
    @gildalartey-sr8iy 9 місяців тому +1

    thank u very much

  • @wilkyclergeot9416
    @wilkyclergeot9416 2 роки тому

    " Incredible teacher thanks for everything"

  • @fahimkhalasi4115
    @fahimkhalasi4115 2 роки тому

    can you upload the physics 1 course algebra based unit 5 on the mathandscience app

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    -y axis 0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10

  • @nonono-m6n
    @nonono-m6n Рік тому

    i got this information from an learning web page called Byju's is it correct
    A force is required to change the state of motion of an object. It can move an object at rest, stop and slow a moving object and/or change the direction of a moving object.
    A force is required to stop a moving object. - Byju's

  • @jjsmallpiece9234
    @jjsmallpiece9234 2 роки тому

    Should force be measured in apples? Which variety - Golden Delicious or Braeburns?
    1GD = 1N?? Would a conversion factor be needed for Braeburns to Golden Delicious. Do you have different apple varieties in the US? Europe apples to USA apples??

    • @simpleman283
      @simpleman283 2 роки тому +1

      Red Delicious is the best. Always go w/best.

  • @maxmudita5622
    @maxmudita5622 Рік тому

    Does force only affect baryonic matter?

  • @Marfojeffrey
    @Marfojeffrey Рік тому

    God bless u😊❤

  • @nonono-m6n
    @nonono-m6n Рік тому

    A force is required to change the state of motion of an object. It can move an object at rest, stop and slow a moving object and/or change the direction of a moving object.
    A force is required to stop a moving object. - Byju's

  • @roselineclement
    @roselineclement Рік тому

    Nice teaching

  • @HexaEdits07
    @HexaEdits07 2 роки тому

    sir will these lecture will be simultaneously uploaded on app too?

  • @nonono-m6n
    @nonono-m6n Рік тому

    Does force stop

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    asks horizontal verical components

  • @kville5796
    @kville5796 10 місяців тому

    Thank you.

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    45 degrees half=22.5 36.9 degrees half=18.4

  • @hooberdoober576
    @hooberdoober576 2 роки тому

    Do E&M and I'll be a fan. Registered EE

  • @ArtisanTony
    @ArtisanTony 2 роки тому

    I will always think of gravity as a force. So what if space time is warped. The force of gravity caused it to warp :) So maybe gravity is not a force on the object that is affected (like an asteroid approaching Earth) but spacetime being warped caused the object to change direction so in effect, gravy applied an indirect force on the asteroid. This argument goes way back and seems to be more about personalities than facts :)

  • @HudzineEWEIDO
    @HudzineEWEIDO 4 місяці тому

    Agree i learn out from your

  • @hemrajue3434
    @hemrajue3434 2 роки тому

    If two forces of 3N and 2N act in the same direction,can we add them like 3i+2i=5i?

  • @kareemsalessi
    @kareemsalessi 6 місяців тому

    Any amount of force moves any amount of mass???😊

    • @kareemsalessi
      @kareemsalessi 6 місяців тому

      43:00 It moves the block, but ONLY IF IT IS IN SPACE!!! Ok, that was true fairytale-physics

  • @OnyinyeNnanna-ug7qi
    @OnyinyeNnanna-ug7qi 11 місяців тому

    Thank you sir

  • @mike2884
    @mike2884 Рік тому

    Amazing !

  • @frankroper3274
    @frankroper3274 2 роки тому

    This makes me think of the pyramids! I don't know how they were built but if the Egyptians knew how much force they had available and how much force they needed they could have built a platform at an angle to match the work necessary to move the large loads.

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    45 degrees below the horizontal

  • @RockySinghaniyaRocky
    @RockySinghaniyaRocky Рік тому

    10:47-27am4/1/24

  • @NightKnight25
    @NightKnight25 2 роки тому

    Really good

  • @AramKuech
    @AramKuech 5 місяців тому

    I appreciate it

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    force 2(5n) fx=4n fy=3n}

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    vertical horizontal component

  • @thedeadmansstory3049
    @thedeadmansstory3049 Місяць тому

    great!

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    10.0 newton -x axis 10 -y axis

  • @YujiuWang-qc8bn
    @YujiuWang-qc8bn 5 місяців тому

    If you want to watch last two videos of the playlist,please reply me"Why'2 unavaliable videos are hidden'appeared on my computer interface?",and then I'll reply you.

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    45 degrees x-7 axis y-7 axis 7x7 =49

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    11.07n x axis -4.07n y axis

  • @drumtwo4seven
    @drumtwo4seven 2 роки тому

    Nice 👍

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    -x=-1 y-2 45x2=90 45/2=22.5

  • @khalidalmusaifer8054
    @khalidalmusaifer8054 Місяць тому +1

    thank you so much for this video I came from 2024

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    fx=10 cos(-45 degrees)

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    -0-=tan-1(-4.07/11.07)

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    fx=10n-2.93=7.07 n

  • @IconOfSin
    @IconOfSin 2 роки тому

    Coming up next week: "How To Use A Force"

  • @nonono-m6n
    @nonono-m6n Рік тому

    is it right

  • @StudyChannel-ti4tl
    @StudyChannel-ti4tl Рік тому

    9:43

  • @AmaduElias
    @AmaduElias 7 місяців тому

    I don't understand why you had negative 45

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    45 degrees 36.9 degrees

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    0 below horizontal

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    /122.5+16.6

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    force is push and pull

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    x axis y axis 14/2=7

  • @grannygrammar6436
    @grannygrammar6436 2 роки тому

    The title of this lesson is *not* called "Forces."
    The title of this lesson is called "The Title of Lesson One."
    According to the screen, the title of lesson one, aka The Title of Lesson One, is "Forces - Part 1."

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    4x3=12

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    -o-=-20.2 degrees

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    5 n 36.9 degrees

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    36.9 degrees

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    -20.2 degrees

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому

    radius 180 degrees

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 Рік тому +1

    7.07